diff options
| author | Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@gmail.com> | 2005-12-30 15:10:41 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@gmail.com> | 2005-12-30 15:10:41 +0000 |
| commit | 78ef48ad54f3f3d026ec9b5e1065ffce87f99844 (patch) | |
| tree | 946f4dd6ae19a5613dff94028074e355a944484d /pod/perltodo.pod | |
| parent | 263cb4a6f8ed72054b3a96de216b5a39651a5ec9 (diff) | |
| download | perl-78ef48ad54f3f3d026ec9b5e1065ffce87f99844.tar.gz | |
Update perltodo. First shot at perl593delta.
p4raw-id: //depot/perl@26539
Diffstat (limited to 'pod/perltodo.pod')
| -rw-r--r-- | pod/perltodo.pod | 20 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/pod/perltodo.pod b/pod/perltodo.pod index 2ab61f3052..a8a6d797cc 100644 --- a/pod/perltodo.pod +++ b/pod/perltodo.pod @@ -25,22 +25,14 @@ programming languages offer you 1 line of immortality? The roadmap to 5.10 envisages feature based releases, as various items in this TODO are completed. -=head2 Needed for a 5.9.3 release - -=over - -=item * -Implement L</lexical pragmas> - -=back - =head2 Needed for a 5.9.4 release =over =item * -Review assertions. Review syntax to combine assertions. Can assertions take -advantage of the lexical pragams work? L</What hooks would assertions need?> + +Review assertions. Review syntax to combine assertions. Assertions could take +advantage of the lexical pragmas work. L</What hooks would assertions need?> =back @@ -544,10 +536,8 @@ or a willingness to learn. =head2 lexical pragmas -Reimplement the mechanism of lexical pragmas to be more extensible. Fix -current pragmas that don't work well (or at all) with lexical scopes or in -run-time eval(STRING) (C<sort>, C<re>, C<encoding> for example). MJD has a -preliminary patch that implements this. +Document the new support for lexical pragmas in 5.9.3 and how %^H works. +Maybe C<re>, C<encoding>, maybe other pragmas could be made lexical. =head2 Attach/detach debugger from running program |