summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pod/perlfaq7.pod
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pod/perlfaq7.pod')
-rw-r--r--pod/perlfaq7.pod196
1 files changed, 169 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/pod/perlfaq7.pod b/pod/perlfaq7.pod
index e1bccc883f..070d9653d4 100644
--- a/pod/perlfaq7.pod
+++ b/pod/perlfaq7.pod
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
=head1 NAME
-perlfaq7 - Perl Language Issues ($Revision: 1.21 $, $Date: 1998/06/22 15:20:07 $)
+perlfaq7 - Perl Language Issues ($Revision: 1.28 $, $Date: 1999/05/23 20:36:18 $)
=head1 DESCRIPTION
@@ -18,19 +18,17 @@ In the words of Chaim Frenkel: "Perl's grammar can not be reduced to BNF.
The work of parsing perl is distributed between yacc, the lexer, smoke
and mirrors."
-=head2 What are all these $@%* punctuation signs, and how do I know when to use them?
+=head2 What are all these $@%&* punctuation signs, and how do I know when to use them?
They are type specifiers, as detailed in L<perldata>:
$ for scalar values (number, string or reference)
@ for arrays
% for hashes (associative arrays)
+ & for subroutines (aka functions, procedures, methods)
* for all types of that symbol name. In version 4 you used them like
pointers, but in modern perls you can just use references.
-While there are a few places where you don't actually need these type
-specifiers, you should always use them.
-
A couple of others that you're likely to encounter that aren't
really type specifiers are:
@@ -180,7 +178,7 @@ own module. Make sure to change the names appropriately.
# if using RCS/CVS, this next line may be preferred,
# but beware two-digit versions.
- $VERSION = do{my@r=q$Revision: 1.21 $=~/\d+/g;sprintf '%d.'.'%02d'x$#r,@r};
+ $VERSION = do{my@r=q$Revision: 1.28 $=~/\d+/g;sprintf '%d.'.'%02d'x$#r,@r};
@ISA = qw(Exporter);
@EXPORT = qw(&func1 &func2 &func3);
@@ -229,6 +227,10 @@ own module. Make sure to change the names appropriately.
1; # modules must return true
+The h2xs program will create stubs for all the important stuff for you:
+
+ % h2xs -XA -n My::Module
+
=head2 How do I create a class?
See L<perltoot> for an introduction to classes and objects, as well as
@@ -313,7 +315,7 @@ caller's scope.
Variable suicide is when you (temporarily or permanently) lose the
value of a variable. It is caused by scoping through my() and local()
-interacting with either closures or aliased foreach() interator
+interacting with either closures or aliased foreach() iterator
variables and subroutine arguments. It used to be easy to
inadvertently lose a variable's value this way, but now it's much
harder. Take this code:
@@ -326,12 +328,13 @@ harder. Take this code:
print "Finally $f\n";
The $f that has "bar" added to it three times should be a new C<$f>
-(C<my $f> should create a new local variable each time through the
-loop). It isn't, however. This is a bug, and will be fixed.
+(C<my $f> should create a new local variable each time through the loop).
+It isn't, however. This was a bug, now fixed in the latest releases
+(tested against 5.004_05, 5.005_03, and 5.005_56).
-=head2 How can I pass/return a {Function, FileHandle, Array, Hash, Method, Regexp}?
+=head2 How can I pass/return a {Function, FileHandle, Array, Hash, Method, Regex}?
-With the exception of regexps, you need to pass references to these
+With the exception of regexes, you need to pass references to these
objects. See L<perlsub/"Pass by Reference"> for this particular
question, and L<perlref> for information on references.
@@ -344,7 +347,7 @@ reference to an existing or anonymous variable or function:
func( \$some_scalar );
- func( \$some_array );
+ func( \@some_array );
func( [ 1 .. 10 ] );
func( \%some_hash );
@@ -387,28 +390,42 @@ If you're planning on generating new filehandles, you could do this:
$fh = openit('< /etc/motd');
print <$fh>;
-=item Passing Regexps
+=item Passing Regexes
+
+To pass regexes around, you'll need to be using a release of Perl
+sufficiently recent as to support the C<qr//> construct, pass around
+strings and use an exception-trapping eval, or else be very, very clever.
+
+Here's an example of how to pass in a string to be regex compared
+using C<qr//>:
-To pass regexps around, you'll need to either use one of the highly
-experimental regular expression modules from CPAN (Nick Ing-Simmons's
-Regexp or Ilya Zakharevich's Devel::Regexp), pass around strings
-and use an exception-trapping eval, or else be be very, very clever.
-Here's an example of how to pass in a string to be regexp compared:
+ sub compare($$) {
+ my ($val1, $regex) = @_;
+ my $retval = $val1 =~ /$regex/;
+ return $retval;
+ }
+ $match = compare("old McDonald", qr/d.*D/i);
+
+Notice how C<qr//> allows flags at the end. That pattern was compiled
+at compile time, although it was executed later. The nifty C<qr//>
+notation wasn't introduced until the 5.005 release. Before that, you
+had to approach this problem much less intuitively. For example, here
+it is again if you don't have C<qr//>:
sub compare($$) {
- my ($val1, $regexp) = @_;
- my $retval = eval { $val =~ /$regexp/ };
+ my ($val1, $regex) = @_;
+ my $retval = eval { $val1 =~ /$regex/ };
die if $@;
return $retval;
}
- $match = compare("old McDonald", q/d.*D/);
+ $match = compare("old McDonald", q/($?i)d.*D/);
Make sure you never say something like this:
- return eval "\$val =~ /$regexp/"; # WRONG
+ return eval "\$val =~ /$regex/"; # WRONG
-or someone can sneak shell escapes into the regexp due to the double
+or someone can sneak shell escapes into the regex due to the double
interpolation of the eval and the double-quoted string. For example:
$pattern_of_evil = 'danger ${ system("rm -rf * &") } danger';
@@ -484,7 +501,7 @@ could conceivably have several packages in that same file all
accessing the same private variable, but another file with the same
package couldn't get to it.
-See L<perlsub/"Peristent Private Variables"> for details.
+See L<perlsub/"Persistent Private Variables"> for details.
=head2 What's the difference between dynamic and lexical (static) scoping? Between local() and my()?
@@ -563,7 +580,7 @@ However, dynamic variables (aka global, local, or package variables)
are effectively shallowly bound. Consider this just one more reason
not to use them. See the answer to L<"What's a closure?">.
-=head2 Why doesn't "my($foo) = <FILE>;" work right?
+=head2 Why doesn't "my($foo) = E<lt>FILEE<gt>;" work right?
C<my()> and C<local()> give list context to the right hand side
of C<=>. The E<lt>FHE<gt> read operation, like so many of Perl's
@@ -626,7 +643,7 @@ where they don't belong.
This is explained in more depth in the L<perlsyn>. Briefly, there's
no official case statement, because of the variety of tests possible
in Perl (numeric comparison, string comparison, glob comparison,
-regexp matching, overloaded comparisons, ...). Larry couldn't decide
+regex matching, overloaded comparisons, ...). Larry couldn't decide
how best to do this, so he left it out, even though it's been on the
wish list since perl1.
@@ -797,9 +814,134 @@ This can't go just anywhere. You have to put a pod directive where
the parser is expecting a new statement, not just in the middle
of an expression or some other arbitrary yacc grammar production.
+=head2 How do I clear a package?
+
+Use this code, provided by Mark-Jason Dominus:
+
+ sub scrub_package {
+ no strict 'refs';
+ my $pack = shift;
+ die "Shouldn't delete main package"
+ if $pack eq "" || $pack eq "main";
+ my $stash = *{$pack . '::'}{HASH};
+ my $name;
+ foreach $name (keys %$stash) {
+ my $fullname = $pack . '::' . $name;
+ # Get rid of everything with that name.
+ undef $$fullname;
+ undef @$fullname;
+ undef %$fullname;
+ undef &$fullname;
+ undef *$fullname;
+ }
+ }
+
+Or, if you're using a recent release of Perl, you can
+just use the Symbol::delete_package() function instead.
+
+=head2 How can I use a variable as a variable name?
+
+Beginners often think they want to have a variable contain the name
+of a variable.
+
+ $fred = 23;
+ $varname = "fred";
+ ++$$varname; # $fred now 24
+
+This works I<sometimes>, but it is a very bad idea for two reasons.
+
+The first reason is that they I<only work on global variables>.
+That means above that if $fred is a lexical variable created with my(),
+that the code won't work at all: you'll accidentally access the global
+and skip right over the private lexical altogether. Global variables
+are bad because they can easily collide accidentally and in general make
+for non-scalable and confusing code.
+
+Symbolic references are forbidden under the C<use strict> pragma.
+They are not true references and consequently are not reference counted
+or garbage collected.
+
+The other reason why using a variable to hold the name of another
+variable a bad idea is that the question often stems from a lack of
+understanding of Perl data structures, particularly hashes. By using
+symbolic references, you are just using the package's symbol-table hash
+(like C<%main::>) instead of a user-defined hash. The solution is to
+use your own hash or a real reference instead.
+
+ $fred = 23;
+ $varname = "fred";
+ $USER_VARS{$varname}++; # not $$varname++
+
+There we're using the %USER_VARS hash instead of symbolic references.
+Sometimes this comes up in reading strings from the user with variable
+references and wanting to expand them to the values of your perl
+program's variables. This is also a bad idea because it conflates the
+program-addressable namespace and the user-addressable one. Instead of
+reading a string and expanding it to the actual contents of your program's
+own variables:
+
+ $str = 'this has a $fred and $barney in it';
+ $str =~ s/(\$\w+)/$1/eeg; # need double eval
+
+Instead, it would be better to keep a hash around like %USER_VARS and have
+variable references actually refer to entries in that hash:
+
+ $str =~ s/\$(\w+)/$USER_VARS{$1}/g; # no /e here at all
+
+That's faster, cleaner, and safer than the previous approach. Of course,
+you don't need to use a dollar sign. You could use your own scheme to
+make it less confusing, like bracketed percent symbols, etc.
+
+ $str = 'this has a %fred% and %barney% in it';
+ $str =~ s/%(\w+)%/$USER_VARS{$1}/g; # no /e here at all
+
+Another reason that folks sometimes think they want a variable to contain
+the name of a variable is because they don't know how to build proper
+data structures using hashes. For example, let's say they wanted two
+hashes in their program: %fred and %barney, and to use another scalar
+variable to refer to those by name.
+
+ $name = "fred";
+ $$name{WIFE} = "wilma"; # set %fred
+
+ $name = "barney";
+ $$name{WIFE} = "betty"; # set %barney
+
+This is still a symbolic reference, and is still saddled with the
+problems enumerated above. It would be far better to write:
+
+ $folks{"fred"}{WIFE} = "wilma";
+ $folks{"barney"}{WIFE} = "betty";
+
+And just use a multilevel hash to start with.
+
+The only times that you absolutely I<must> use symbolic references are
+when you really must refer to the symbol table. This may be because it's
+something that can't take a real reference to, such as a format name.
+Doing so may also be important for method calls, since these always go
+through the symbol table for resolution.
+
+In those cases, you would turn off C<strict 'refs'> temporarily so you
+can play around with the symbol table. For example:
+
+ @colors = qw(red blue green yellow orange purple violet);
+ for my $name (@colors) {
+ no strict 'refs'; # renege for the block
+ *$name = sub { "<FONT COLOR='$name'>@_</FONT>" };
+ }
+
+All those functions (red(), blue(), green(), etc.) appear to be separate,
+but the real code in the closure actually was compiled only once.
+
+So, sometimes you might want to use symbolic references to directly
+manipulate the symbol table. This doesn't matter for formats, handles, and
+subroutines, because they are always global -- you can't use my() on them.
+But for scalars, arrays, and hashes -- and usually for subroutines --
+you probably want to use hard references only.
+
=head1 AUTHOR AND COPYRIGHT
-Copyright (c) 1997, 1998 Tom Christiansen and Nathan Torkington.
+Copyright (c) 1997-1999 Tom Christiansen and Nathan Torkington.
All rights reserved.
When included as part of the Standard Version of Perl, or as part of