diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'pod')
| -rw-r--r-- | pod/perldiag.pod | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | pod/perlrecharclass.pod | 4 |
2 files changed, 28 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/pod/perldiag.pod b/pod/perldiag.pod index 106fe41121..c29925a2a4 100644 --- a/pod/perldiag.pod +++ b/pod/perldiag.pod @@ -5904,7 +5904,7 @@ yourself. a perl4 interpreter, especially if the next 2 tokens are "use strict" or "my $var" or "our $var". -=item Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/%s/ +=item Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ (F) Perl could not figure out what you meant inside this construct; this notifies you that it is giving up trying. @@ -6402,6 +6402,31 @@ to find out why that isn't happening. (F) The unexec() routine failed for some reason. See your local FSF representative, who probably put it there in the first place. +=item Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ + +(F) While parsing an extended character class a ']' character was encountered +at a point in the definition where the only legal use of ']' is to close the +character class definition as part of a '])', you may have forgotten the close +paren, or otherwise confused the parser. + +=item Expecting close paren for nested extended charclass in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ + +(F) While parsing a nested extended character class like: + + (?[ ... (?flags:(?[ ... ])) ... ]) + ^ + +we expected to see a close paren ')' (marked by ^) but did not. + +=item Expecting close paren for wrapper for nested extended charclass in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ + +(F) While parsing a nested extended character class like: + + (?[ ... (?flags:(?[ ... ])) ... ]) + ^ + +we expected to see a close paren ')' (marked by ^) but did not. + =item Unexpected binary operator '%c' with no preceding operand in regex; marked by S<<-- HERE> in m/%s/ diff --git a/pod/perlrecharclass.pod b/pod/perlrecharclass.pod index 79480e4131..8c008507d1 100644 --- a/pod/perlrecharclass.pod +++ b/pod/perlrecharclass.pod @@ -1128,8 +1128,8 @@ hence both of the following work: Any contained POSIX character classes, including things like C<\w> and C<\D> respect the C<E<sol>a> (and C<E<sol>aa>) modifiers. -C<< (?[ ]) >> is a regex-compile-time construct. Any attempt to use -something which isn't knowable at the time the containing regular +Note that C<< (?[ ]) >> is a regex-compile-time construct. Any attempt +to use something which isn't knowable at the time the containing regular expression is compiled is a fatal error. In practice, this means just three limitations: |