| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a mandatory warning, not obeying -X or lexical warning bits.
To make it behave like an internal deprecation warning would be a lot
of hassle to do in pure Perl.
The warning is modelled on that supplied by deprecate.pm for
deprecated-in-core .pm libraries. It points to the specific CPAN
distribution that contains the .pl libraries. The CPAN version, of
course, does not generate the warning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After the recent, long discussion about this topic and demonstrated
cases where the deprecation warnings may actually *break* things, we
agreed on IRC to push the "active" deprecation warnings to after 5.12.
--Steffen
From f1b2d650aa126e06fc270dd0a44b8a6bf0da6e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:12:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove deprecation warnings from perl4-era tools
The libraries still have deprecation warnings in their comments but the
mandatory run-time warnings are disabled until after 5.12.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Message-ID: <20041228192937.GB7824@solemn.turbinal.org>
p4raw-id: //depot/perl@23838
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From: perl-5.8.0@ton.iguana.be (via RT) <perlbug-followup@perl.org>
Message-ID: <rt-3.0.11-33173-103504.3.54366755060383@perl.org>
p4raw-id: //depot/perl@23681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From: "Curtis Poe" <cp@onsitetech.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 11:17:40 -0700
Message-ID: <015c01c200f3$cb691670$1a01a8c0@ot.onsitetech.com>
Subject: [Patch] for security problem with Text::ParseWords
From: "Curtis Poe" <cp@onsitetech.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 15:10:18 -0700
Message-ID: <022f01c20114$4b3c4550$1a01a8c0@ot.onsitetech.com>
p4raw-id: //depot/perl@16727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[editor's note: this commit combines approximate 4 months of furious
releases of Andy Dougherty and Larry Wall - see pod/perlhist.pod for
details. Andy notes that;
Alas neither my "Irwin AccuTrack" nor my DC 600A quarter-inch cartridge
backup tapes from that era seem to be readable anymore. I guess 13 years
exceeds the shelf life for that backup technology :-(.
]
|
|
|
|
| |
See patch #20.
|
|
See patch #4.
|