| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Whilst the code for 'q' and 'Q' in pp_pack is itself well behaved if enabled
on a perl with 32 bit IVs (using SvNV instead of SvIV and SvUV), the
regression tests are not. Several tests use an eval of "pack 'q'" to
determine if 64 bit integer support is available (instead of
$Config{ivsize}), and t/op/pack.t fails many tests. While these could be
fixed (or skipped), unfortunately the approach of evaling "pack 'q'" is
fairly popular on CPAN, so the breakage isn't just in the perl core, and
might also be present in code we can't see or submit patches for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes a macro not yet even in a development release, and splits
its calls into two classes: those where the input is a byte; and those
where it can be any unsigned integer. The byte implementation avoids a
function call on EBCDIC platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All the tables are now based on the native character set, so using
uvuni() in almost all cases is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fairly short paradigm is repeated in several places; a later commit
will improve it.
|
|
|
|
| |
The usual case is nice regular bytes in the host's nice regular order.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should restore support for big endian Crays. It doesn't support
mixed-endian systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It feels wrong to have it as an implicit parameter sucked in via the textual
expansion of the macro. Whilst it can be derived from the parameter
'datumtype', it seems that the C compiler generates a lot less efficient code
that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is considerably simpler to re-order the bytes before reading them into
the variable of the desired type, than to read into the variable and then
need a specialised "reverse this integer" function for each size of integer.
This should restore support for big endian Crays. It doesn't support
mixed-endian systems. Support for mixed-endian systems can be restored (if
needed) by re-ordering the bytes correctly at the locations which currently
only know how to reverse the bytes.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is one place where SHIFT16() is not immediately followed by
DO_BO_UNPACK() ('n!' and 'v!'), and one place where SHIFT32() is not
immediately followed by DO_BO_UNPACK() ('N!' and 'V!'). Every other use of
either macro is followed by DO_BO_UNPACK(). For the two locations that don't
have DO_BO_UNPACK(), the modifiers '<' and '>' are illegal, hence
DO_BO_UNPACK() will always be a no-op. Hence add DO_BO_UNPACK() to both
(which permits refactoring to simplify things), and add assert()s that the
assumptions are true.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The conditionally compiled code to figure out the correct named integer
size for UVs and IVs is no longer needed, as my_swabn() will swap UVs and
IVs, whatever their length.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Delete the now-unused mixed-endian definitions of DO_BO_UNPACK and
DO_BO_PACK, and the macro BO_CANT_DOIT, as they were the last two things
using it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the macro NEEDS_SWAP to initialise needs_swap based on
TYPE_ENDIANNESS(datumtype). This makes the two definitions of DO_BO_UNPACK
identical, and the two definitions of DO_BO_PACK identical.
This also makes building pp_pack.c on a mixed endian byteorder architecture
a compile time error. The commit adds pointers on where to add code to
re-instate support for such architectures.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the only users of my_{be,le,h}to{be,le,h}n, so remove the
definitions for those macros.
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, eliminate the intermediate macros DO_BO_PACK_PTR and DO_BO_UNPACK_PTR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously they were using a my_letoh* function for the appropriate size.
This commit probably breaks fixed 16 and 32 bit templates on big endian
Crays where sizeof(short) and sizeof(int) are 8. A future commit will
restore support. (Although it's not clear whether such Crays can still
build blead cleanly, as we've not had any feedback since Boeing
decommissioned their Cray.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously they were casting the pointer to an integer value, calling
a my_letoh* function for the appropriate size, and casting the return value
back to a pointer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously they were using sizeof() on the type argument passed to the
macro. This change makes their implementation more like DO_BO_(UN)?PACK
and DO_BO_(UN)?PACK_PTR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The byte-order handling can be simplified considerably if we don't have to
support mixed-endian systems. It's not clear whether Perl 5.000 even
compiled on PDP-11s, let alone more recent versions.
Support probably can be added back at the end of the refactoring, if someone
has time and a PDP-11 to test on, but for the intermediate stages it is a
lot easier not to need to think about such platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This means that there are always macros or functions for ntohl, ntohs,
htonl and htons available, so eliminate use of HAS_NTOHL etc, and
unconditionally compile the code that it was protecting. However, as code
on CPAN is using these guard macros, define all of them in perl.h
(Technically the 4 are not quite no-ops, as they truncate their values to
32 or 16 bits, to be consistent with the implementations for platforms which
need re-ordering.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This means that there are always macros or functions for vtohl, vtohs,
htovl and htovs available, so eliminate HAS_VTOHL etc, and unconditionally
compile the code that it was protecting. grep.cpan.me shows that no code on
CPAN uses any of these macros.
(Technically the 4 are not quite no-ops, as they truncate their values to
32 or 16 bits, to be consistent with the implementations for platforms which
need re-ordering.)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 07409e015252427f in April 2005 replaced all the uses of these two
macros with DO_BO_PACK_PC and DO_BO_UNPACK_PC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PERL_PACK_CAN_SHRIEKSIGN has been unconditionally defined for versions 5.9.x
and greater, and undefined for 5.8.x. As we are never going to need to
port changes back to maint-5.8 any more, eliminate all the 5.8.x related code
and the macro that supports it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PERL_PACK_CAN_BYTEORDER has been unconditionally defined for versions 5.9.x
and greater, and undefined for 5.8.x. As we are never going to need to
port changes back to maint-5.8 any more, eliminate all the 5.8.x related code,
and the macro that supports it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The C source is the output from genpacksizetables.pl
Previously it was pasted into pp_pack.c
LocalWords: packprops
|
|
|
|
| |
See ticket RT #116366 for the full discussion
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Someone asked me how to use unpackstring() since they couldn't figure it
out from the docs, so I added some things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Way back in 67597c89125e7e14 we misspelled _IEEE_FP as __IEEE_FP,
with a spurious leading underscore. Which I then copied and
pasted into pp_pack.c in baf3cf9c09c529. This means that on
Alpha and Itanium systems with the default selection of IEEE
floating point, we've actually (for the last decade!) been
using a workaround intended for VAX or Alpha and Itanium builds
that have explicitly selected VAX-compatible floating point
formats. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This converts to use is_SPACE_utf8() instead of the (soon to be
deprecated) is_utf8_space(). The macro is faster, avoiding the function
call completely, so the performance need to make a special case for a SPACE
character is gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This finishes the removal of register declarations started by
eb578fdb5569b91c28466a4d1939e381ff6ceaf4. It neglected the ones in
function parameter declarations, and didn't include things in dist, ext,
and lib, which this does include
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sv_len_utf8 is now careful not to record caches on magical or over-
loaded scalars (any non-PV, in fact). It also returns the number of
logical characters correctly, regardless of whether its input is utf8.
So we can greatly simplify this code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes most register declarations in C code (and accompanying
documentation) in the Perl core. Retained are those in the ext
directory, Configure, and those that are associated with assembly
language.
See:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/314994/whats-a-good-example-of-register-variable-usage-in-c
which says, in part:
There is no good example of register usage when using modern compilers
(read: last 10+ years) because it almost never does any good and can do
some bad. When you use register, you are telling the compiler "I know
how to optimize my code better than you do" which is almost never the
case. One of three things can happen when you use register:
The compiler ignores it, this is most likely. In this case the only
harm is that you cannot take the address of the variable in the
code.
The compiler honors your request and as a result the code runs slower.
The compiler honors your request and the code runs faster, this is the least likely scenario.
Even if one compiler produces better code when you use register, there
is no reason to believe another will do the same. If you have some
critical code that the compiler is not optimizing well enough your best
bet is probably to use assembler for that part anyway but of course do
the appropriate profiling to verify the generated code is really a
problem first.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This updates the editor hints in our files for Emacs and vim to request
that tabs be inserted as spaces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nigel Sandever said:
> The error message produced by the following snippets is very unhelpful:
>
> c:\>perl -wle"print unpack 'v/a*', qq[a]"
> '/' must follow a numeric type in unpack at -e line 1.
>
> c:\>perl -wle"print unpack 'v/a*', ''"
> '/' must follow a numeric type in unpack at -e line 1.
>
> c:\>perl -wle"print unpack 'v/a*', ' '"
> '/' must follow a numeric type in unpack at -e line 1.
The "problem" is that the data string is too short. But
unpack doesn't generate a warning (or croak) in this case
for simple patterns:
mhx@r2d2 $ perl -MData::Dumper -we'print Dumper([unpack "n", "a"])'
$VAR1 = [];
So, I'd say your code should just behave in exactly the
same way. No warning, no return values.
|
|
|
|
| |
There is a macro that means this code; use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The convention is that when the interpreter dies with an internal error, the
message starts "panic: ". Historically, many panic messages had been terse
fixed strings, which means that the out-of-range values that triggered the
panic are lost. Now we try to report these values, as such panics may not be
repeatable, and the original error message may be the only diagnostic we get
when we try to find the cause.
We can't report diagnostics when the panic message is generated by something
other than croak(), as we don't have *printf-style format strings. Don't
attempt to report values in panics related to *printf buffer overflows, as
attempting to format the values to strings may repeat or compound the
original error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a regression in 5.10 caused by change 23966/08ca2aa38a29,
which added a bit of faulty logic. It was treating U* in the middle of
a pack template as equivalent to U0, if the input string was empty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[perl #86534]
When using 80-bit extended precision floats, gcc-generated code
can sometimes copy 10 bytes and sometimes 12. This can lead to 2 random
bytes something appearing in the output of pack('F') and pack('D').
Work around this by using sv_2nv() rather than SvNV()
(which expands to (SvNOK(sv) ? SvNVX(sv) : sv_2nv(sv) )
The basic issue is that the NV return value of a function is returned
in a floating point register, which is then written to memory as 10 bytes,
whereas a direct assignment, e.g. NV nv1 = nv2, is done by a 12-byte
memory copy.
However, when the sv_2nv() function is called as part of the ?:
expression, its returned value is written as *10* bytes to a temp location
on the stack, which is then copied as a *12* byte value to its final
destination, picking up 2 bytes of random data from the stack, which then
appears in the output of pack(), and ultimately leads to a test failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
# New Ticket Created by (Peter J. Acklam)
# Please include the string: [perl #81904]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=81904 >
Signed-off-by: Abigail <abigail@abigail.be>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
split() would crash because the third item on the stack wasn't the
regular expression it expected. unpack("%2H", ...) would return both
the unpacked result and the checksum on the stack, similarly for
unpack("%2u", ...).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When memcpy() is used on a long double pointer with gcc 4.4 in some
cases it seems to treat it as a long double assignment, copying only
the first 12 bytes. Use unions so the types we're copying into the
pack output or from the unpack input are unsigned char[], to avoid the
apparent bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Hi,
Using the attached patch to the blead source (as of a few hours ago), I can
build perl with the following OS/compiler/make combos.
On 32-bit XP:
MSVC++ 7.0 / dmake (uses win32/makefile.mk)
MSVC++ 7.0 / nmake (uses win32/Makefile)
Borland C++ 5.5.1 / dmake
mingw.org's gcc-4.3.0 / dmake
mingw.org's gcc-3.4.5 / dmake
mingw-w64.sf's 32-bit gcc-4.4.3 / dmake
(There's a bug with that last compiler on XP.
The perl it builds on XP hangs on XP, but runs ok if copied across to Vista.
I think this is unrelated to the patches - probably even unrelated to perl.
Without these patches perl will not even build using that last compiler.)
On 64-bit Vista:
32-bit MSVC++ 7.0 / nmake (uses win32/Makefile)
32-bit MSVC++ 7.0 / dmake (uses win32/makfile.mk)
32-bit Borland C++ 5.5.1 / dmake
mingw.org's 32-bit gcc-4.4.0 / dmake
mingw.org's 32-bit gcc-3.4.5 / dmake
mingw-w64.sf's 32-bit gcc-4.4.3 / dmake
mingw-w64.sf's 64-bit gcc-4.4.3 / dmake
mingw-w64.sf's 64-bit x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.4.3 / dmake
64-bit MicrosoftPlatform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2 / dmake (uses
win32/makefile.mk)
64-bit MicrosoftPlatform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2 / nmake (uses
win32/Makefile)
Not all of those builds pass all tests - but where the removal of the
patches still permits perl to build, the same tests still fail. That is,
*nothing* is lost by including these patches - but there are significant
gains.
Each of the above builds was done according to the normal win32
configuration parameters - ie multi-threaded, non debug. No unusual config
settings were applied. (I did build one debug perl on Vista using
mingw-w64.sf's 32-bit gcc-4.4.3 and it built fine.)
Please feel free to apply these patches (with or without modification) -
and, yes, you're more than welcome to blame me if they cause any breakages
;-)
Of course, some of those compilers (Borland, Microsoft, and the compilers
from mingw.org) already build perl *without* having to apply any patches.
It's just the other compilers that need the patches. The purpose of testing
with Borland, Microsoft, and the mingw.org compilers is just to check that
these patches don't break them.
As a final check, I've done a build on my aging linux (mandrake-9.1) box,
gcc-3.2.2. I built with '-des -Duselongdouble -Duse64bitint -Dusedevel'. No
problem with that, either.
If there's additional testing requirements please let me know, and I'll try
to oblige.
I believe the patch applied successfully for me - see below my sig for the
output.
Cheers,
Rob
Rob@desktop2 ~/GIT/blead
$ patch -p0 <blead_diff.diff
patching file dist/threads/threads.xs
patching file handy.h
patching file cpan/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/lib/ExtUtils/MM_Win32.pm
patching file op.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 5774 (offset 47 lines).
patching file pp_pack.c
patching file util.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 5366 (offset -28 lines).
patching file win32/makefile.mk
patching file win32/perlhost.h
patching file win32/win32.c
patching file win32/win32.h
patching file README.win32
patching file XSUB.h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace ckWARN{,2,3,4}() && Perl_warner() with it, which trades reduced code
size (about 0.2%), for 1 more function call if warnings are not enabled.
However, if we're now in the L1 or L2 cache when we weren't previously, that's
still going to be a speed win.
|
| |
|
| |
|