From 45c2973d2c99a36bfeae408ba656939295c2cb15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Clark Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:44:42 +0000 Subject: Make the request to fix rather than report bugs in microperl politer. Expand it slightly to clarify why bare bug reports aren't likely to get acted upon. --- README.micro | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'README.micro') diff --git a/README.micro b/README.micro index c6597323c1..93859a0e20 100644 --- a/README.micro +++ b/README.micro @@ -4,7 +4,10 @@ on the other hand this means that interfaces between Perl and your operating system are left very -- minimal. All this is experimental. If you don't know what to do with microperl -you probably shouldn't. Do not report bugs in microperl; fix the bugs. +you probably shouldn't. Please don't report bugs in microperl; fix the +bugs. (Bugs reports about microperl without fixes/patches are equivalent +to wishlist requests - they won't be discarded, but they likely won't get +worked on either, unless they chance to coincide with someone's personal itch) We assume ANSI C89 plus the following: - , -- cgit v1.2.1