From e826edc34da0d6aba91789176560a95b7ac6c6a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jarkko Hietaniemi Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:02:39 +0000 Subject: Strange: the same mysterious regex study bug seems to be present both in OS/390 and POSIX-BC. Deep EBCDIC magic that regex engine gets wrong, or a bug in some compiler/library shared by the two platforms? From Thomas Dorner. p4raw-id: //depot/perl@13170 --- t/op/study.t | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 't/op/study.t') diff --git a/t/op/study.t b/t/op/study.t index 3ca95355b0..d90efdc4d2 100755 --- a/t/op/study.t +++ b/t/op/study.t @@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ ok(/^$_$/); $* = 1; # test 3 only tested the optimized version--this one is for real ok("ab\ncd\n" =~ /^cd/); -if ($^O eq 'os390') { - # Even with the alarm() OS/390 can't manage these tests +if ($^O eq 'os390' or $^O eq 'posix-bc') { + # Even with the alarm() OS/390 and BS2000 can't manage these tests # (Perl just goes into a busy loop, luckily an interruptable one) for (25..26) { print "not ok $_ # TODO compiler bug?\n" } $test += 2; -- cgit v1.2.1