The example of expansion of multiple views claimed that the resulting
subquery nest would not get fully flattened because of an aggregate
function.  There's no aggregate in the example, though, only a user
defined function confusingly named MIN().  In a modern server, the
reason for the non-flattening is that MIN() is volatile, but I'm
unsure whether that was true back when this text was written.

Let's reduce the confusion level by using LEAST() instead (which
we didn't have at the time this example was created).  And then
we can just say that the planner will flatten the sub-queries, so
the rewrite system doesn't have to.

Noted by Paul Jungwirth.  This text is old enough to vote, so
back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyXZFnmp9PcvX1EVR2dR=XG5e6E-AELr8AHCNZ8RYrpnPw@mail.gmail.com

Commits 4ea03f3f4 et al arranged to filter out row counts in parallel
plans, because those are dependent on the number of workers actually
obtained.  Somehow I missed that the 'Rows Removed by Filter' counts
can also vary, so fix that too.  Per buildfarm.

This seems worth a last-minute patch because unreliable regression
tests are a serious pain in the rear for packagers.

Like the previous patch, back-patch to v11 where this test was
introduced.

Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 36cb12a154ee719a594401e7f8763e472f41614a

After altering a subscription, we should wait until the updated table
sync data has been fetched by the subscriber.

The previous statement that using a passphrase disables the ability to
change the server's SSL configuration without a server restart was no
longer completely true since the introduction of
ssl_passphrase_command_supports_reload.

This happens when we add a replica identity column on a subscriber
that does not yet exist on the publisher, according to the mapping
maintained by the subscriber.  Code that checks whether the target
relation on the subscriber is updatable would check the replica
identity attribute bitmap with a column number -1, which would result
in an error.  To fix, skip such columns in the bitmap lookup and
consider the relation not updatable.  The result is consistent with
the rule that the replica identity columns on the subscriber must be a
subset of those on the publisher, since if the column doesn't exist on
the publisher, the column set on the subscriber can't be a subset.

Reported-by: Tim Clarke <tim.clarke@minerva.info>
Analyzed-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a9139c29-7ddd-973b-aa7f-71fed9c38d75%40minerva.info

Currently, postgres_fdw does not support preparing a remote transaction
for two-phase commit even in the case where the remote transaction is
read-only, but the old error message appeared to imply that that was not
supported only if the remote transaction modified remote tables.  Change
the message so as to include the case where the remote transaction is
read-only.

Also fix a comment above the message.

Also add a note about the lack of supporting PREPARE TRANSACTION to the
postgres_fdw documentation.

Reported-by: Gilles Darold
Author: Gilles Darold and Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Kyotaro Horiguchi
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/08600ed3-3084-be70-65ba-279ab19618a5%40darold.net