Backpatch-through: 11

This requires a bit of further infrastructure-extension to allow
trapping errors reported by numeric_in and pg_unicode_to_server,
but otherwise it's pretty straightforward.

In the case of jsonb_in, we are only capturing errors reported
during the initial "parse" phase.  The value-construction phase
(JsonbValueToJsonb) can also throw errors if assorted implementation
limits are exceeded.  We should improve that, but it seems like a
separable project.

Andrew Dunstan and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3bac9841-fe07-713d-fa42-606c225567d6@dunslane.net

Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.

Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy.  Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com

Per flame graph from Jelte Fennema, COPY FROM ... USING BINARY shows
input validation taking at least 5% of the profile, so it's worth trying
to be more efficient here. With this change, validation of pure ASCII is
nearly 40% faster on contemporary Intel hardware. To make this change
legible and easier to adopt to additional architectures, use helper
functions to abstract the platform details away.

Reviewed by Nathan Bossart

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsG%3Dk8t%3DC457FXnoBXb%3D8iA4OaZkbFogFMachWif7mNnww%40mail.gmail.com

Calculate end of input rather than maintaining length,
per prior suggestion from Heikki Linnakangas. In passing,
use more natural language in a comment.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b4648cc2-5e9c-c93a-52cc-51e5c658a4f6%40iki.fi

Up until now, we've had a policy of only marking certain variables
in the PostgreSQL header files with PGDLLIMPORT, but now we've
decided to mark them all. This means that extensions running on
Windows should no longer operate at a disadvantage as compared to
extensions running on Linux: if the variable is present in a header
file, it should be accessible.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYanc1_FSfimhgiWSqVyP5KKmh5NP2BWNwDhO8Pg2vGYQ@mail.gmail.com

Backpatch-through: 10

Our previous validator used a traditional algorithm that performed
comparison and branching one byte at a time. It's useful in that
we always know exactly how many bytes we have validated, but that
precision comes at a cost. Input validation can show up prominently
in profiles of COPY FROM, and future improvements to COPY FROM such
as parallelism or faster line parsing will put more pressure on input
validation. Hence, add fast paths for both ASCII and multibyte UTF-8:

Use bitwise operations to check 16 bytes at a time for ASCII. If
that fails, use a "shift-based" DFA on those bytes to handle the
general case, including multibyte. These paths are relatively free
of branches and thus robust against all kinds of byte patterns. With
these algorithms, UTF-8 validation is several times faster, depending
on platform and the input byte distribution.

The previous coding in pg_utf8_verifystr() is retained for short
strings and for when the fast path returns an error.

Review, performance testing, and additional hacking by: Heikki
Linakangas, Vladimir Sitnikov, Amit Khandekar, Thomas Munro, and
Greg Stark

Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsEV_SzH%2BOLyCiyon%3DiwggSyMh_eF6A3LU2tiWf3Cy2ZQg%40mail.gmail.com

An incorrectly-encoded multibyte character near the end of a string
could cause various processing loops to run past the string's
terminating NUL, with results ranging from no detectable issue to
a program crash, depending on what happens to be in the following
memory.

This isn't an issue in the server, because we take care to verify
the encoding of strings before doing any interesting processing
on them.  However, that lack of care leaked into client-side code
which shouldn't assume that anyone has validated the encoding of
its input.

Although this is certainly a bug worth fixing, the PG security team
elected not to regard it as a security issue, primarily because
any untrusted text should be sanitized by PQescapeLiteral or
the like before being incorporated into a SQL or psql command.
(If an app fails to do so, the same technique can be used to
cause SQL injection, with probably much more dire consequences
than a mere client-program crash.)  Those functions were already
made proof against this class of problem, cf CVE-2006-2313.

To fix, invent PQmblenBounded() which is like PQmblen() except it
won't return more than the number of bytes remaining in the string.
In HEAD we can make this a new libpq function, as PQmblen() is.
It seems imprudent to change libpq's API in stable branches though,
so in the back branches define PQmblenBounded as a macro in the files
that need it.  (Note that just changing PQmblen's behavior would not
be a good idea; notably, it would completely break the escaping
functions' defense against this exact problem.  So we just want a
version for those callers that don't have any better way of handling
this issue.)

Per private report from houjingyi.  Back-patch to all supported branches.

This gives a small performance gain, by reducing the number of calls
to the conversion/verification function, and letting it work with
larger inputs. Also, reorganizing the input pipeline makes it easier
to parallelize the input parsing: after the input has been converted
to the database encoding, the next stage of finding the newlines can
be done in parallel, because there cannot be any newline chars
"embedded" in multi-byte characters in the encodings that we support
as server encodings.

This changes behavior in one corner case: if client and server
encodings are the same single-byte encoding (e.g. latin1), previously
the input would not be checked for zero bytes ('\0'). Any fields
containing zero bytes would be truncated at the zero. But if encoding
conversion was needed, the conversion routine would throw an error on
the zero. After this commit, the input is always checked for zeros.

Reviewed-by: John Naylor
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e7861509-3960-538a-9025-b75a61188e01%40iki.fi