Oh, can't test 'with' in Pythons that don't have it.2011-08-11T12:31:29+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2011-08-11T12:31:29+00:008e1e857632f8fc9c49c3aaada3b0ae0630fa4fbd
The for-else fix also fixed 'with' statements, and therefore, issue #128.2011-08-10T12:03:45+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2011-08-10T12:03:45+00:007fb7094df42803bd1d0ca934a9f6e761d1a81da4
for-else constructs are handled properly, avoiding bogus partial branch warnings. Fixes issue #122. Bonus irony: this also makes while 1 loops automatically understood better too.2011-07-04T17:53:18+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2011-07-04T17:53:18+00:0091692c31f757fe78e9a7376033f66772fc97f36b
A test and a fix for issue #122, maybe?2011-07-04T14:27:39+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2011-07-04T14:27:39+00:009a57b96e1688fba3038b86a2f2c8244167db158f
Better handling of the partial-branch exclusion regexes. Finishes issue #113.2011-06-01T03:12:40+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2011-06-01T03:12:40+00:00139497ac9cf495a13e9f3323db489bf56054f5d4
WIP for partial branch exclusion. #1132011-05-17T14:06:40+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2011-05-17T14:06:40+00:0034413aab8a61579789faa342331ac9c8a55ee5a4
This test isn't ready yet, but I don't want it in my working tree for now.2010-11-08T00:19:03+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2010-11-08T00:19:03+00:00db2b0562b3be9b51998371f47392c39a980ebf46
Properly record multiple exits separately. Fixes #62.2010-04-28T02:00:59+00:00Ned Batchelderned@nedbatchelder.com2010-04-28T02:00:59+00:002ad723a05059d723d9dda504df9bbcd1e091caa2