From a73c2b9bfe6679423cc8e1e8f83538a1caa030b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ned Batchelder Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:15:53 -0400 Subject: Remove notes about me being available for custom work, and rewrap many paragraphs. --- doc/branch.rst | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/branch.rst') diff --git a/doc/branch.rst b/doc/branch.rst index 13b9dc6d..f6b3ac81 100644 --- a/doc/branch.rst +++ b/doc/branch.rst @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ __ http://ivory.idyll.org/blog Excluding code -------------- -If you have :ref:`excluded code `, a condtional will not be -counted as a branch if one of its choices is excluded:: +If you have :ref:`excluded code `, a condtional will not be counted +as a branch if one of its choices is excluded:: def only_one_choice(x): if x: @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ counted as a branch if one of its choices is excluded:: # x is always true. blah3() -Because the ``else`` clause is excluded, the ``if`` only has one possible -next line, so it isn't considered a branch at all. +Because the ``else`` clause is excluded, the ``if`` only has one possible next +line, so it isn't considered a branch at all. Structurally partial branches @@ -115,6 +115,6 @@ pragma:: break Here the while loop will never complete because the break will always be taken -at some point. Coverage.py can't work that out on its own, but the -"no branch" pragma indicates that the branch is known to be partial, and -the line is not flagged. +at some point. Coverage.py can't work that out on its own, but the "no branch" +pragma indicates that the branch is known to be partial, and the line is not +flagged. -- cgit v1.2.1