Use next(iterator) instead of py3k incompatible iterator.next() (related to #264017)

Requires python >= 2.6.

2 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/test/unittest_table.py b/test/unittest_table.py
index 7c58d69..2ce566a 100644
--- a/test/unittest_table.py
+++ b/test/unittest_table.py
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ class TableTC(TestCase):
     def test_iterable(self):
         """test iter(table)"""
         it = iter(self.table)
-        self.assertTrue(it.next() == self.table.data[0])
-        self.assertTrue(it.next() == self.table.data[1])
+        self.assertTrue(next(it) == self.table.data[0])
+        self.assertTrue(next(it) == self.table.data[1])
 
     def test_get_rows(self):
         """tests Table.get_rows()"""
diff --git a/test/unittest_tree.py b/test/unittest_tree.py
index fb8e303..ea5af81 100644
--- a/test/unittest_tree.py
+++ b/test/unittest_tree.py
@@ -189,11 +189,11 @@ class PostfixedDepthFirstIterator_ClassTest(TestCase):
     def test_known_values_next(self):
         L = ['child_2_1', 'child_3_1', 'child_2_2', 'child_1_1', 'child_2_3', 'child_1_2', 'root']
         iter = PostfixedDepthFirstIterator(self.o)
-        o = iter.next()
+        o = next(iter)
         i = 0
         while o:
             self.assertEqual(o.id, L[i])
-            o = iter.next()
+            o = next(iter)
             i += 1
 
 
@@ -235,11 +235,11 @@ class PrefixedDepthFirstIterator_ClassTest(TestCase):
     def test_known_values_next(self):
         L = ['root', 'child_1_1', 'child_2_1', 'child_2_2', 'child_3_1', 'child_1_2', 'child_2_3']
         iter = PrefixedDepthFirstIterator(self.o)
-        o = iter.next()
+        o = next(iter)
         i = 0
         while o:
             self.assertEqual(o.id, L[i])
-            o = iter.next()
+            o = next(iter)
             i += 1