summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/build/content/inheritance.txt
blob: ce7348429aefe67851bc8a1e383dcb0c964ceea5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
Inheritance
===================

Using template inheritance, two or more templates can organize themselves into an **inheritance chain**, where content and functions from all involved templates can be intermixed.  The general paradigm of template inheritance is this:  if a template `A` inherits from template `B`, then template `A` agrees to send the executional control to template `B` at runtime (`A` is called the **inheriting** template).  Template `B`, the **inherited** template, then makes decisions as to what resources from `A` shall be executed.

In practice, it looks like this.  Heres a hypothetical inheriting template, `index.html`:

    ## index.html
    <%inherit file="base.html"/>
    
    <%def name="header()">
        this is some header content
    </%def>
    
    this is the body content.
    
And `base.html`, the inherited template:

    ## base.html
    <html>
        <body>
            <div class="header">
                ${self.header()}
            </div>
            
            ${self.body()}
            
            <div class="footer">
                ${self.footer()}
            </div>
        </body>
    </html>

    <%def name="footer()">
        this is the footer
    </%def>

Here is a breakdown of the execution:
    
* When `index.html` is rendered, control immediately passes to `base.html`.
* `base.html` then renders the top part of an HTML document, then calls the method `header()` off of a built in namespace called `self` (this namespace was first introduced in the Namespaces chapter in [namespaces_builtin_self](rel:namespaces_builtin_self)).  Since `index.html` is the topmost template and also defines a def called `header()`, its this `header()` def that gets executed.
* Control comes back to `base.html`.  Some more HTML is rendered.
* `base.html` executes `self.body()`.  The `body()` function on all template-based namespaces refers to the main body of the template, therefore the main body of `index.html` is rendered.
* Control comes back to `base.html`.  More HTML is rendered, then the `self.footer()` expression is invoked.
* The `footer` def is only defined in `base.html`, so being the topmost definition of `footer`, its the one that executes.  If `index.html` also specified `footer`, then its version would **override** that of the base.
* `base.html` finishes up rendering its HTML and the template is complete, producing:

        <html>
            <body>
                <div class="header">
                    this is some header content
                </div>
        
                this is the body content.
            
                <div class="footer">
                    this is the footer
                </div>
            </body>
        </html>

...and that is template inheritance in a nutshell.  The main idea is that the methods that you call upon `self` always correspond to the topmost definition of that method.  Very much the way `self` works in a Python class, even though Mako is not actually using Python class inheritance to implement this functionality.  (Mako doesn't take the "inheritance" metaphor too seriously; while useful to setup some commonly recognized semantics, a textual template is not very much like an object-oriented class construct in practice).

### Using the "next" namespace to produce content wrapping {@name=next}

Sometimes you have an inheritance chain that spans more than two templates.  Or maybe you don't, but youd like to build your system such that extra inherited templates can be inserted in the middle of a chain where they would be smoothly integrated.  If each template wants to define its layout just within its main body, you can't just call `self.body()` to get at the inheriting template's body, since that is only the topmost body.  To get at the body of the *next* template, you call upon the namespace `next`, which is the namespace of the template **immediately following** the current template.

Lets change the line in `base.html` which calls upon `self.body()` to instead call upon `next.body()`:

    ## base.html
    <html>
        <body>
            <div class="header">
                ${self.header()}
            </div>
        
            ${next.body()}
        
            <div class="footer">
                ${self.footer()}
            </div>
        </body>
    </html>

    <%def name="footer()">
        this is the footer
    </%def>

Lets also add an intermediate template called `layout.html`, which inherits from `base.html`:

    ## layout.html
    <%inherit file="base.html"/>
    <ul>
        ${self.toolbar()}
    </ul>
    <div class="mainlayout">
        ${next.body()}
    </div>
    
    <%def name="toolbar()">
        <li>selection 1</li>
        <li>selection 2</li>
        <li>selection 3</li>
    </%def>    

And finally change `index.html` to inherit from `layout.html` instead:

    ## index.html
    <%inherit file="layout.html"/>
    
    ## .. rest of template
    
In this setup, each call to `next.body()` will render the body of the next template in the inheritance chain (which can be written as `base.html -> layout.html -> index.html`).  Control is still first passed to the bottommost template `base.html`, and `self` still references the topmost definition of any particular def.

The output we get would be:

    <html>
        <body>
            <div class="header">
                this is some header content
            </div>

            <ul>
                <li>selection 1</li>
                <li>selection 2</li>
                <li>selection 3</li>
            </ul>
            
            <div class="mainlayout">
            this is the body content.
            </div>
            
            <div class="footer">
                this is the footer
            </div>
        </body>
    </html>

So above, we have the `<html>`, `<body>` and `header`/`footer` layout of `base.html`, we have the `<ul>` and `mainlayout` section of `layout.html`, and the main body of `index.html` as well as its overridden `header` def.  The `layout.html` template is inserted into the middle of the chain without `base.html` having to change anything.  Without the `next` namespace, only the main body of `index.html` could be used; there would be no way to call `layout.html`'s body content.

### Using the "parent" namespace to augment defs {@name=parent}

Lets now look at the other inheritance-specific namespace, the opposite of `next` called `parent`.  `parent` is the namespace of the template **immediately preceding** the current template.  What is most useful about this namespace is the methods within it which can be accessed within overridden versions of those methods.  This is not as hard as it sounds and is very much like using the `super` keyword in Python.  Lets modify `index.html` to augment the list of selections provided by the `toolbar` function in `layout.html`:

    ## index.html
    <%inherit file="layout.html"/>

    <%def name="header()">
        this is some header content
    </%def>

    <%def name="toolbar()">
        ## call the parent's toolbar first
        ${parent.toolbar()}
        <li>selection 4</li>
        <li>selection 5</li>
    </%def>
        
    this is the body content.

Above, we implemented a `toolbar()` function, which is meant to override the definition of `toolbar` within the inherited template `layout.html`.  However, since we want the content from that of `layout.html` as well, we call it via the `parent` namespace whenever we want it's content, in this case before we add our own selections.  So the output for the whole thing is now:

    <html>
        <body>
            <div class="header">
                this is some header content
            </div>

            <ul>
                <li>selection 1</li>
                <li>selection 2</li>
                <li>selection 3</li>
                <li>selection 4</li>
                <li>selection 5</li>
            </ul>
        
            <div class="mainlayout">
            this is the body content.
            </div>
        
            <div class="footer">
                this is the footer
            </div>
        </body>
    </html>

and you're now a template inheritance ninja !

### Inheritable Attributes

The `attr` accessor of the `Namespace` object allows access to module level variables declared in a template.  By accessing `self.attr`, you can access regular attributes from the inheritance chain as declared in `<%! %>` sections.  Such as:

    <%!
        class_ = "grey"
    %>
    
    <div class="${self.attr.class_}">
        ${self.body()}
    </div>
    
If a an inheriting template overrides `class_` to be `white`, as in:

    <%!
        class_ = "white"
    %>
    <%inherit file="parent.html"/>
    
    This is the body
    
You'll get output like:

    <div class="white">
        This is the body
    </div>