diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/pycrypto/2010q2/000215.html')
-rw-r--r-- | pipermail/pycrypto/2010q2/000215.html | 79 |
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q2/000215.html b/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q2/000215.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed60799 --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q2/000215.html @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1 + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:pycrypto%40lists.dlitz.net?Subject=%5Bpycrypto%5D%20Pycrypto%20working%20with%20python%203.0%20or%203.1&In-Reply-To=4BC218FC.6090106%40gmx.net"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000212.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000216.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1</H1> + <B>Glenn Linderman</B> + <A HREF="mailto:pycrypto%40lists.dlitz.net?Subject=%5Bpycrypto%5D%20Pycrypto%20working%20with%20python%203.0%20or%203.1&In-Reply-To=4BC218FC.6090106%40gmx.net" + TITLE="[pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1">v+python at g.nevcal.com + </A><BR> + <I>Mon Apr 12 21:36:51 CST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000212.html">[pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1 +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000216.html">[pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1 +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#215">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#215">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#215">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#215">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On 4/11/2010 11:46 AM, Christoph Tapler wrote: +><i> Hi, +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Short update - a missing string/byte conversion in the test suite caused +</I>><i> the high FAIL rate. With the conversion, the PASS/FAIL ratio looks way +</I>><i> better (>70% PASS). I assume that the rest of the FAILs have a similar +</I>><i> reason. Just tell me if some of you wants the patch. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Cheers, +</I>><i> Christoph +</I>><i> +</I> +This is great news Christoph! I'm glad to hear of the progress. I'm +not in a position to compile on my new box yet, although in the fullness +of time I hope to be able to compile Python and all its dependencies... +I have never done that on any box, as yet. But if you have it in an +installable form for Windows, I could try it out with my few test cases +from 2.6 -- the encryption aspect of that code is currently disabled in +the 3.1 version, but I am hoping to reenable it when you go public with +fully working 3.1 version. So it could help me and help you, to try +these cases, perhaps. + +Glenn +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000212.html">[pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1 +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000216.html">[pycrypto] Pycrypto working with python 3.0 or 3.1 +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#215">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#215">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#215">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#215">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="http://lists.dlitz.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pycrypto">More information about the pycrypto +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |