summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q4/000357.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/pycrypto/2010q4/000357.html')
-rw-r--r--pipermail/pycrypto/2010q4/000357.html80
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q4/000357.html b/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q4/000357.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ccb9ff6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pipermail/pycrypto/2010q4/000357.html
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [pycrypto] Things that go bump in the night (qNEW)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:pycrypto%40lists.dlitz.net?Subject=%5Bpycrypto%5D%20Things%20that%20go%20bump%20in%20the%20night%20%28qNEW%29&In-Reply-To=">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000362.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000361.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[pycrypto] Things that go bump in the night (qNEW)</H1>
+ <B>Thorsten Behrens</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:pycrypto%40lists.dlitz.net?Subject=%5Bpycrypto%5D%20Things%20that%20go%20bump%20in%20the%20night%20%28qNEW%29&In-Reply-To="
+ TITLE="[pycrypto] Things that go bump in the night (qNEW)">sbehrens at gmx.li
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Dec 29 21:55:41 CST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000362.html">[pycrypto] Wanted: Additional unit tests for Python 3.x porting effort
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000361.html">[pycrypto] Comments on Elgamal, and a broader question: Whither pycrypto?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#357">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#357">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#357">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#357">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>I've been looking at the functions that don't have unit tests, among
+them PublicKey/qNEW. It puzzled me for a bit - qNEW is not an algorithm
+I know, can successfully google for, or find in other crypto packages.
+Looking at the source, though, it seems to be a cousin of DSA, with a
+few differences in the fundamentals (bit sizes of q and p, for one), and
+a lot of differences in the specifics.
+
+I am not going to write any unit tests for qNEW.
+
+It may be a DSA-variant, in which case it is covered already by DSA.py.
+Or it may be a DSA-derivative that's never been standardized, and thus
+scrutinized, and if that's true, then it should just be stricken from
+the code. Given that there's really no documentation on it either in the
+package or anywhere, I'd wager beer that it's not in serious use
+anywhere, anyway.
+
+Thorsten
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000362.html">[pycrypto] Wanted: Additional unit tests for Python 3.x porting effort
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000361.html">[pycrypto] Comments on Elgamal, and a broader question: Whither pycrypto?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#357">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#357">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#357">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#357">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="http://lists.dlitz.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pycrypto">More information about the pycrypto
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>