summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pylint/checkers/base.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pylint/checkers/base.py')
-rw-r--r--pylint/checkers/base.py84
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/pylint/checkers/base.py b/pylint/checkers/base.py
index fe2578e..001a70c 100644
--- a/pylint/checkers/base.py
+++ b/pylint/checkers/base.py
@@ -1468,7 +1468,7 @@ class RecommandationChecker(_BasicChecker):
'consider-using-enumerate',
'Emitted when code that iterates with range and len is '
'encountered. Such code can be simplified by using the '
- 'enumerate builtin.')
+ 'enumerate builtin.'),
}
@staticmethod
@@ -1654,6 +1654,10 @@ class ElifChecker(BaseTokenChecker):
'Used when a function or a method has too many nested '
'blocks. This makes the code less understandable and '
'maintainable.'),
+ 'R0102': ('The if statement can be reduced by %s',
+ 'simplifiable-if-statement',
+ 'Used when an if statement can be reduced to a boolean '
+ 'conversion of the statement\'s test. '),
}
options = (('max-nested-blocks',
{'default' : 5, 'type' : 'int', 'metavar' : '<int>',
@@ -1671,6 +1675,83 @@ class ElifChecker(BaseTokenChecker):
self._if_counter = 0
self._nested_blocks_msg = None
+ @staticmethod
+ def _is_bool_const(node):
+ return (isinstance(node.value, astroid.Const)
+ and isinstance(node.value.value, bool))
+
+ def _is_actual_elif(self, node):
+ """Check if the given node is an actual elif
+
+ This is a problem we're having with the builtin ast module,
+ which splits `elif` branches into a separate if statement.
+ Unfortunately we need to know the exact type in certain
+ cases.
+ """
+
+ if isinstance(node.parent, astroid.If):
+ orelse = node.parent.orelse
+ # current if node must directly follow a "else"
+ if orelse and orelse == [node]:
+ if self._elifs[self._if_counter]:
+ return True
+ return False
+
+ def _check_simplifiable_if(self, node):
+ """Check if the given if node can be simplified.
+
+ The if statement can be reduced to a boolean expression
+ in some cases. For instance, if there are two branches
+ and both of them return a boolean value that depends on
+ the result of the statement's test, then this can be reduced
+ to `bool(test)` without losing any functionality.
+ """
+
+ if self._is_actual_elif(node):
+ # Not interested in if statements with multiple branches.
+ return
+ if len(node.orelse) != 1 or len(node.body) != 1:
+ return
+
+ # Check if both branches can be reduced.
+ first_branch = node.body[0]
+ else_branch = node.orelse[0]
+ if isinstance(first_branch, astroid.Return):
+ if not isinstance(else_branch, astroid.Return):
+ return
+ first_branch_is_bool = self._is_bool_const(first_branch)
+ else_branch_is_bool = self._is_bool_const(else_branch)
+ reduced_to = "returning bool of test"
+ elif isinstance(first_branch, astroid.Assign):
+ if not isinstance(else_branch, astroid.Assign):
+ return
+ first_branch_is_bool = self._is_bool_const(first_branch)
+ else_branch_is_bool = self._is_bool_const(else_branch)
+ reduced_to = "assigning bool of test"
+ else:
+ return
+
+ if not first_branch_is_bool or not else_branch_is_bool:
+ return
+ if not first_branch.value.value:
+ # This is a case that can't be easily simplified and
+ # if it can be simplified, it will usually result in a
+ # code that's harder to understand and comprehend.
+ # Let's take for instance `arg and arg <= 3`. This could theoretically be
+ # reduced to `not arg or arg > 3`, but the net result is that now the
+ # condition is harder to understand, because it requires understanding of
+ # an extra clause:
+ # * first, there is the negation of truthness with `not arg`
+ # * the second clause is `arg > 3`, which occurs when arg has a
+ # a truth value, but it implies that `arg > 3` is equivalent
+ # with `arg and arg > 3`, which means that the user must
+ # think about this assumption when evaluating `arg > 3`.
+ # The original form is easier to grasp.
+ return
+
+ self.add_message('simplifiable-if-statement', node=node,
+ args=(reduced_to, ))
+
def process_tokens(self, tokens):
# Process tokens and look for 'if' or 'elif'
for _, token, _, _, _ in tokens:
@@ -1698,6 +1779,7 @@ class ElifChecker(BaseTokenChecker):
@check_messages('too-many-nested-blocks')
def visit_if(self, node):
+ self._check_simplifiable_if(node)
self._check_nested_blocks(node)
self._if_counter += 1