| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Their comparison semantics were ill-defined, and mostly an
implementation detail for the old, 'native' specs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The internal features from those classes will be removed in future
versions:
- The `Spec` class is incompatible with the support of multiple syntaxes
- The `SpecItem` class was an implementation detail, but doesn't support
complex `Range` combinations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code follows closely the specification available at
https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/semver.html.
Despite similarities, the matching logic is fully separate from the
`native` code, since both might evolve at their own scales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of choosing the comparison on each `.match()` call, the
expression is converted to a combination of `Range()` expressions
(simple comparison to a semver-compliant `Version`).
`Range()` objects can be combined with `And` and `Or` through the
`AnyOf` and `AllOf` clauses (sticking to Python's naming scheme).
Some specific flags have been provided to those range, allowing users to
subtly alter the matching behaviour - thus accomodating different
versioning schemes:
- `<0.1.2` won't match `0.1.2-rc1`, unless the prerelease_policy flag is
set to either `always` or `same-patch`
- `<0.1.2` will match `0.1.1-rc1`, unless the `prerelease_policy` flag
is set to `same-patch`
- `==0.1.2` will always match `0.1.2+build44`, unless the `build_policy`
is set to `strict`.
The `Spec` item has been updated, alongside `SpecItem`.
Those objects keep the original expression as attributes, but don't use
them for comparisons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eases the creation of version objects from existing versions.
We still validate the type and structure of each component.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those functions had been forgotten in the docs.
Clarify that `Version('1.0.1-alpha').next_patch()` is
`Version('1.0.1')`, since that version is the smallest non-prerelease
version greater than `Version('1.0.1-alpha')`.
Closes: #67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per [their blog post of the 27th April](https://blog.readthedocs.com/securing-subdomains/) ‘Securing subdomains’:
> Starting today, Read the Docs will start hosting projects from subdomains on the domain readthedocs.io, instead of on readthedocs.org. This change addresses some security concerns around site cookies while hosting user generated data on the same domain as our dashboard.
Test Plan: Manually visited all the links I’ve modified.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems that stating the copyright years is useless after all :)
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fixed typo in README.rst
|
| |
| |
| | |
Replaced 'licence' with 'license'
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SemVer 2.0.0 states that "Build metadata SHOULD be ignored when
determining version precedence".
This means that, when comparing ``0.1.0+1`` to ``0.1.0+bcd``::
>>> Version('0.1.0+1') == Version('0.1.0+bcd')
False
>>> Version('0.1.0+1') != Version('0.1.0+bcd')
True
>>> Version('0.1.0+1') < Version('0.1.0+bcd')
False
>>> Version('0.1.0+1') > Version('0.1.0+bcd')
False
>>> Version('0.1.0+1') <= Version('0.1.0+bcd')
False
>>> Version('0.1.0+1') >= Version('0.1.0+bcd')
False
>>> compare(Version('0.1.0+1'), Version('0.1.0+bcd'))
NotImplemented
This change also has the following effects:
- When including build metadata in a ``Spec``, the only valid options
are ``Spec('==0.1.0+sth')`` and ``Spec('!=0.1.0+sth')``
- The meaning of ``Spec('==0.1.0+')`` is now "Only version 0.1.0 without
build metadata"
- ``Spec('==0.1.0')`` now matches ``Version('0.1.0+anything')``
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Also fixes README rendering on PyPI, hopefully.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Let's keep github happy...
|
|
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Barrois <raphael.barrois@polyconseil.fr>
|