Move CHANGES to HISTORY

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 167 deletions

diff --git a/CHANGES.txt b/CHANGES.txt
index 6e28bdd..467de26 100644
--- a/CHANGES.txt
+++ b/CHANGES.txt
@@ -31,170 +31,3 @@
   accepting new connections. This situation was previously difficult to
   diagnose.
   See https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/pull/322
-
-1.4.4 (2020-06-01)
-------------------
-
-- Fix an issue with keep-alive connections in which memory usage was higher
-  than expected because output buffers were being reused across requests on
-  a long-lived connection and each buffer would not be freed until it was full
-  or the connection was closed. Buffers are now rotated per-request to
-  stabilize their behavior.
-
-  See https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/pull/300
-
-- Waitress threads have been updated to contain their thread number. This will
-  allow loggers that use that information to print the thread that the log is
-  coming from.
-
-  See https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/pull/302
-
-1.4.3 (2020-02-02)
-------------------
-
-Security Fixes
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-- In Waitress version 1.4.2 a new regular expression was added to validate the
-  headers that Waitress receives to make sure that it matches RFC7230.
-  Unfortunately the regular expression was written in a way that with invalid
-  input it leads to catastrophic backtracking which allows for a Denial of
-  Service and CPU usage going to a 100%.
-
-  This was reported by Fil Zembowicz to the Pylons Project. Please see
-  https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-73m2-3pwg-5fgc
-  for more information.
-
-1.4.2 (2020-01-02)
-------------------
-
-Security Fixes
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-- This is a follow-up to the fix introduced in 1.4.1 to tighten up the way
-  Waitress strips whitespace from header values. This makes sure Waitress won't
-  accidentally treat non-printable characters as whitespace and lead to a
-  potental HTTP request smuggling/splitting security issue.
-
-  Thanks to ZeddYu Lu for the extra test cases.
-
-  Please see the security advisory for more information:
-  https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4
-
-  CVE-ID: CVE-2019-16789
-
-Bugfixes
-~~~~~~~~
-
-- Updated the regex used to validate header-field content to match the errata
-  that was published for RFC7230.
-
-  See: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4189
-
-
-1.4.1 (2019-12-24)
-------------------
-
-Security Fixes
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-- Waitress did not properly validate that the HTTP headers it received were
-  properly formed, thereby potentially allowing a front-end server to treat a
-  request different from Waitress. This could lead to HTTP request
-  smuggling/splitting.
-
-  Please see the security advisory for more information:
-  https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4
-
-  CVE-ID: CVE-2019-16789
-
-1.4.0 (2019-12-20)
-------------------
-
-Bugfixes
-~~~~~~~~
-
-- Waitress used to slam the door shut on HTTP pipelined requests without
-  setting the ``Connection: close`` header as appropriate in the response. This
-  is of course not very friendly. Waitress now explicitly sets the header when
-  responding with an internally generated error such as 400 Bad Request or 500
-  Internal Server Error to notify the remote client that it will be closing the
-  connection after the response is sent.
-
-- Waitress no longer allows any spaces to exist between the header field-name
-  and the colon. While waitress did not strip the space and thereby was not
-  vulnerable to any potential header field-name confusion, it should have sent
-  back a 400 Bad Request. See https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/issues/273
-
-Security Fixes
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-- Waitress implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230
-  (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.5) which states:
-
-      Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is
-      the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line
-      terminator and ignore any preceding CR.
-
-  Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF
-  the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and
-  the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This
-  can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress
-  may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP
-  message.
-
-  For more information I can highly recommend the blog post by ZeddYu Lu
-  https://blog.zeddyu.info/2019/12/08/HTTP-Smuggling-en/
-
-  Please see the security advisory for more information:
-  https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-pg36-wpm5-g57p
-
-  CVE-ID: CVE-2019-16785
-
-- Waitress used to treat LF the same as CRLF in ``Transfer-Encoding: chunked``
-  requests, while the maintainer doesn't believe this could lead to a security
-  issue, this is no longer supported and all chunks are now validated to be
-  properly framed with CRLF as required by RFC7230.
-
-- Waitress now validates that the ``Transfer-Encoding`` header contains only
-  transfer codes that it is able to decode. At the moment that includes the
-  only valid header value being ``chunked``.
-
-  That means that if the following header is sent:
-
-  ``Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked``
-
-  Waitress will send back a 501 Not Implemented with an error message stating
-  as such, as while Waitress supports ``chunked`` encoding it does not support
-  ``gzip`` and it is unable to pass that to the underlying WSGI environment
-  correctly.
-
-  Waitress DOES NOT implement support for ``Transfer-Encoding: identity``
-  eventhough ``identity`` was valid in RFC2616, it was removed in RFC7230.
-  Please update your clients to remove the ``Transfer-Encoding`` header if the
-  only transfer coding is ``identity`` or update your client to use
-  ``Transfer-Encoding: chunked`` instead of ``Transfer-Encoding: identity,
-  chunked``.
-
-  Please see the security advisory for more information:
-  https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-g2xc-35jw-c63p
-
-  CVE-ID: CVE-2019-16786
-
-- While validating the ``Transfer-Encoding`` header, Waitress now properly
-  handles line-folded ``Transfer-Encoding`` headers or those that contain
-  multiple comma seperated values. This closes a potential issue where a
-  front-end server may treat the request as being a chunked request (and thus
-  ignoring the Content-Length) and Waitress using the Content-Length as it was
-  looking for the single value ``chunked`` and did not support comma seperated
-  values.
-
-- Waitress used to explicitly set the Content-Length header to 0 if it was
-  unable to parse it as an integer (for example if the Content-Length header
-  was sent twice (and thus folded together), or was invalid) thereby allowing
-  for a potential request to be split and treated as two requests by HTTP
-  pipelining support in Waitress. If Waitress is now unable to parse the
-  Content-Length header, a 400 Bad Request is sent back to the client.
-
-  Please see the security advisory for more information:
-  https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-4ppp-gpcr-7qf6