From 845cb2e432c73712d27a96dc3765a539b13a195f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolai Kosjar Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:29:34 +0100 Subject: C++: Better names for Scope's iterators Scope::lastMember() was misleading. Change-Id: I953d489b8a2a9b86321f73cad3b7b371c4acf91f Reviewed-by: Orgad Shaneh Reviewed-by: Przemyslaw Gorszkowski --- src/plugins/cpptools/cpppointerdeclarationformatter.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/plugins/cpptools/cpppointerdeclarationformatter.cpp') diff --git a/src/plugins/cpptools/cpppointerdeclarationformatter.cpp b/src/plugins/cpptools/cpppointerdeclarationformatter.cpp index d707752dfc..d1a2537cca 100644 --- a/src/plugins/cpptools/cpppointerdeclarationformatter.cpp +++ b/src/plugins/cpptools/cpppointerdeclarationformatter.cpp @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ void PointerDeclarationFormatter::processIfWhileForStatement(ExpressionAST *expr // // The declaration for 's' will be handled in visit(SimpleDeclarationAST *ast), // so handle declaration for 't' here. - Scope::iterator it = block->lastMember() - 1; + Scope::iterator it = block->memberEnd() - 1; Symbol *symbol = *it; if (symbol && symbol->asScope()) { // True if there is a "{ ... }" following. --it; -- cgit v1.2.1