Use double quotes by default

This is an entirely mechanically generated (chefstyle -a) change, to go
along with chef/chefstyle#5 . We should pick something and use it
consistently, and my opinion is that double quotes are the appropriate
thing.

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/spec/unit/dsl/regsitry_helper_spec.rb b/spec/unit/dsl/regsitry_helper_spec.rb
index 6508a12b6f..8647b79020 100644
--- a/spec/unit/dsl/regsitry_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/unit/dsl/regsitry_helper_spec.rb
@@ -33,22 +33,22 @@ describe Chef::Resource::RegistryKey do
 
   context "tests registry dsl" do
     it "resource can access registry_helper method registry_key_exists" do
-      expect(@resource.respond_to?('registry_key_exists?')).to eq(true)
+      expect(@resource.respond_to?("registry_key_exists?")).to eq(true)
     end
     it "resource can access registry_helper method registry_get_values" do
-      expect(@resource.respond_to?('registry_get_values')).to eq(true)
+      expect(@resource.respond_to?("registry_get_values")).to eq(true)
     end
     it "resource can access registry_helper method registry_has_subkey" do
-      expect(@resource.respond_to?('registry_has_subkeys?')).to eq(true)
+      expect(@resource.respond_to?("registry_has_subkeys?")).to eq(true)
     end
     it "resource can access registry_helper method registry_get_subkeys" do
-      expect(@resource.respond_to?('registry_get_subkeys')).to eq(true)
+      expect(@resource.respond_to?("registry_get_subkeys")).to eq(true)
     end
     it "resource can access registry_helper method registry_value_exists" do
-      expect(@resource.respond_to?('registry_value_exists?')).to eq(true)
+      expect(@resource.respond_to?("registry_value_exists?")).to eq(true)
     end
     it "resource can access registry_helper method data_value_exists" do
-      expect(@resource.respond_to?('registry_data_exists?')).to eq(true)
+      expect(@resource.respond_to?("registry_data_exists?")).to eq(true)
     end
   end
 end