From 47fe4a9dfeb177dbcd2fc1ed8f487f3375dd0dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Julian C. Dunn" Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:41:51 -0400 Subject: Make terminology consistent about audits versus controls --- lib/chef/exceptions.rb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/chef/exceptions.rb') diff --git a/lib/chef/exceptions.rb b/lib/chef/exceptions.rb index ecd84c5ba5..22f090789f 100644 --- a/lib/chef/exceptions.rb +++ b/lib/chef/exceptions.rb @@ -399,18 +399,18 @@ class Chef class AuditControlGroupDuplicate < RuntimeError def initialize(name) - super "Audit control group with name '#{name}' has already been defined" + super "Control group with name '#{name}' has already been defined" end end class AuditNameMissing < RuntimeError; end class NoAuditsProvided < RuntimeError def initialize - super "You must provide a block with audits" + super "You must provide a block with controls" end end class AuditsFailed < RuntimeError def initialize(num_failed, num_total) - super "Audit phase found failures - #{num_failed}/#{num_total} audits failed" + super "Audit phase found failures - #{num_failed}/#{num_total} controls failed" end end -- cgit v1.2.1