| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
It's duplicative since you can use `change-prompt simple`.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1829 (Merge `list-prompts` and `change-prompt` into one command)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out cache is supposed to be purgeable without losing information and we
don't want to lose history.
Thanks to @SirNerdBear for pointing out
(https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/1316#issuecomment-435611191)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1836 (Add an API for adding new prompts)
|
|
|
|
| |
Without this the warning will actually be printed on every line.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is for backwards compatibility. Pry Rails uses `#size`:
https://github.com/rweng/pry-rails/blob/77f770f376077e37c69116dda39ff03ee7961f64/lib/pry-rails/prompt.rb#L23
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1316
(support XDG Base Directory Specification)
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
helpers/base: properly backport deprecated methods
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The code is extremely ugly but this way people will have more time to update
their plugins. I'll revert this PR as soon as the new Pry version is out.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1840
(NotImplementedError: vi_editing_mode?() function is unimplemented on this
machine)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`Pry::Platform` really looks like a helper and therefore should be defined as
one. Invoking `Pry::Platform` emits a warning now. Users are encouraged to use
`Pry::Helpers::Platform`.
|
|
|
|
| |
These commands have been deprecated for years. It's high time to get rid of them.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This method doesn't seem to be used anywhere, so there's no benefit in keeping
it.
|
|\
| |
| | |
Update copyrights
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* Added myself (should've done that years ago)
* Made it look like Pry is a team effort
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1738 (Possible to make prompt_name dynamic?)
The user-facing API is the following:
```rb
Pry.config.prompt_name = Pry.lazy { rand(100) }
[1] 80(main)>
[2] 87(main)>
[3] 30(main)>
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Replace `require_relative` with `require`
The project tries to use the `require` form everywhere where possible, which
is the common form
* `require` from `pry.rb`
Spreaded `require` statements where we require internal classes is confusing
* Fixed namespace definition for Config classes
https://github.com/rubocop-hq/ruby-style-guide#namespace-definition recommends
to use explicit nesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we always need to define two procs that look almost the same, duplication
was unavoidable. With help of method wrappers around procs we can reduce it.
As a bonus, the class has some YARD annotations now.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It makes sense to rename it because "objects" we are referring in the context of
prompt are actually prompt "contexts".
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It makes a lot more sense to keep these procs under the `Pry::Prompt` namespace
than `Pry`, which is already heavily populated by other various things.
|
|
|
|
| |
Per https://github.com/rubocop-hq/ruby-style-guide#namespace-definition
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This constant is not used anywhere else but this file so it makes sense to keep
it there.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1823 (Broken upstream when rb-readline is enabled)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1761 (`pry -f` can no longer suppress the loading of .pryrc)
If I recall correctly, we split session loading in #1393 because of `Pry.start`.
This broke `-f`. I think we can get away with a simple reorder in #parse_options
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This improves on https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1813.
I spotted a problem with the way it works: sometimes, if you enter an empty
line, the output would span across two lines:
```
[1] pry(main)>
[2] pry(main)>
[3] pry(main)>
```
This is because overhang is bigger than the current line. I also noticed a bug
with method definition, where defining a method leaves an unwanted empty line:
```
[3] pry(main)> def foo
| end
=> :foo
```
To fix this I changed the way we calculate overhang. First and the most
important change is that I stopped calculating overhang for emacs mode. This is
because it's too risky to introduce this change because it's the default mode
and 99% of our users use this, so there's no need to change this
behaviour. Another reason is that emacs mode users typically don't use any mode
indicators (because emacs has no modes), so it strikes me as a more pragmatic
solution.
With Vi mode we calculate overhang and still support custom indicators.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, the Ring class is written with help of Hash as backend store.
According to the comments, the implementation should behave like a circular
buffer, however it doesn't. Upon reaching maximum capacity Ring doesn't replace
old elements but keeps writing to new cells, deleting old cells, so that the
hash contains `nil` entries.
The new implementation is based on Array and seems to be closer to the actual
Ring. Older elemens get overwritten with newer ones.
This class also includes Enumerable, however none of our APIs take advantage of
it, so it seems like an overkill. There was also a problem with with this API
because of the above-mentioned nils. For example, if the ring exceeds its
maximum size, then callin `Enumerable#first` on it returns `nil`.
The new implementation deals with this with removal of Enumerable. The `#[]`
syntax is preserved, and now `ring[0]` returns an actual element instead of
`nil`. In case users need the Enumerable functionality, they can call
`Ring#to_a` to build the array, which supports the wanted methods.
As for the speed, the new implementation is:
* slower overall because it's thread-safe
* faster without mutexes for `#<<`
* slower without mutexes for `#[]`
Benchmark for old implementation:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
Ring#<< 223.451k i/100ms
Ring#[] 2.837k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
Ring#<< 223.157B (± 3.4%) i/s - 778.097B
Ring#[] 82.485M (± 9.4%) i/s - 402.602M in 4.957792s
```
Benchmark for this implementation:
```
Warming up --------------------------------------
Ring#<< 211.587k i/100ms
Ring#[] 1.974k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
Ring#<< 211.385B (± 2.8%) i/s - 698.439B
Ring#[] 40.292M (±17.0%) i/s - 190.069M in 4.971195s
```
The benchmark:
```rb
require './lib/pry'
require 'benchmark/ips'
Benchmark.ips do |x|
empty_ring = Pry::Ring.new(100)
populated_ring = Pry::Ring.new(100)
150.times { |i| populated_ring << i }
x.report("Ring#<<") do |times|
empty_ring << times
end
x.report("Ring#[]") do |times|
populated_ring[0]
populated_ring[1]
populated_ring[2]
populated_ring[-1]
populated_ring[-2]
populated_ring[-3]
populated_ring[1..2]
populated_ring[-2..-1]
populated_ring[-2..3]
populated_ring[0..-1]
populated_ring[2..-1]
populated_ring[-1..10]
populated_ring[-1..0]
populated_ring[-1..1]
end
end
```
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #1812
|
|
|
|
| |
I figured it's better to deprecate them to let plugin authors update their API.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`HistoryArray` is a very specific name and it doesn't tell the reader what
it *really* means unless you read its code or the docs of the class.
On the other hand, `Ring` is a [very well-known term][1], which means exactly
what `HistoryArray` does. The alias name for it is circular buffer. I chose
`Ring` because it is shorter and used by Golang, so I expect programmers to
be familiar with `Ring`.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_buffer
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/1596
(Unable to inspect object built from class)
Replaces https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1719
Big thanks to @egwspiti for the repro case and the proposed PR.
When a class redefines `respond_to?` or `method_missing` this leads to some
problems and confuses Pry. I found another example where Pry misbehaves:
```
[1] pry(main)> cd Class.new { def method_missing(*) end; def respond_to_missing?(*) true end; }.new
NoMethodError: private method `eval' called for nil:NilClass
from /Users/kyrylo/.gem/ruby/2.4.2/gems/pry-0.11.3/lib/pry/pry_instance.rb:163:in `inject_local'
```
By using `method_defined?` we can work around these bugs since this method
doesn't check whether the receiver responds to a certain message but checks
whether this method is defined (so we don't redefine it later). Seems like a
win-win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replaces #1713
(Pry local config The following methods take a third required argument, an
instance of Pry)
This fulfills queries to `_pry_.config` in:
* Pry::Helpers.tablify
* Pry::Helpers.tablify_to_screen_width
* Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line
Unlike #1713 this PR doesn't introduce any breaking changes thanks to the
default parameter value trick, *except* the `Table#new` signature.
Overall, this brings the code in line with how the rest of Pry works.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was added by 97f1be86b29e41e0a786cf0177d934c4c22e8572 and it feels like a
mishap, thus removing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
b031df2f2f5850ee6e9018f33d35f3485a9b0423 added this command but never made use
of this variable. The method is being passed an argument but it never uses
it. Why? Idk, needs investigation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This command is quite obscure: no docs and the parameter it expects is not used
in the method. For simplicity, I am leaving the comment to check later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The way it's written is still a little bit confusing, however for simplicity of
https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1801 I am leaving this as is and resolving the
parameter issue only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was added by 6fd797d302a63f29d10cf5834bfa25cec7f1ac74.
I inspected it closely and I cannot seem to find the reason for this
parameter. I don't see it being used anywhere and it doesn't seem to do what it
declares. Therefore, I am deleting it.
|
| |
|
| |
|