Rollup merge of #107680 - dtolnay:docrepr, r=Amanieu

Hide repr attribute from doc of types without guaranteed repr

Rustdoc has an undesirable behavior of blindly copying `repr` into the documentation of structs and enums, even when there is no particular repr that the type guarantees to its users. This is a source of confusion for standard library users who assume the fact that a repr is documented means it must be something the standard library promises they can rely on (in transmutes, or FFI).

Some issues on the topic of rustdoc's incorrect handling of `repr`:

- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66401
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90435

In places, the standard library currently works around this confusing rustdoc behavior by just omitting `repr(transparent)` altogether even where it should be required if equivalent code were being written outside of the standard library. See #61969.

IMO that is even more confusing, even for standard library maintainers — see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105018#discussion_r1058400997. It's also not something that works for other reprs like `C` or `u8` which cannot just be omitted even in standard library code.

This PR tries a different approach for some types that are being currently incorrectly documented with a repr.

> **Warning**
> This PR does not imply that every type that still has a `repr` attribute in its docs after this PR is now public for users to rely on. This PR only tries to reduce harm from this longstanding rustdoc issue.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions