From f5e5c28f42a2f6d006785ec8b5e98c11a71bb039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:47:14 -0500 Subject: tree-wide: check if errno is greater then zero gcc is confused by the common idiom of return errno ? -errno : -ESOMETHING and thinks a positive value may be returned. Replace this condition with errno > 0 to help gcc and avoid many spurious warnings. I filed a gcc rfe a long time ago, but it hard to say if it will ever be implemented [1]. Both conventions were used in the codebase, this change makes things more consistent. This is a follow up to bcb161b0230f. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846 --- src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c') diff --git a/src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c b/src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c index 0b1ae706e7..018b4dc596 100644 --- a/src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c +++ b/src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int find_gpt_root(struct udev_device *dev, blkid_probe pr, bool test) { errno = 0; pl = blkid_probe_get_partitions(pr); if (!pl) - return errno ? -errno : -ENOMEM; + return errno > 0 ? -errno : -ENOMEM; nvals = blkid_partlist_numof_partitions(pl); for (i = 0; i < nvals; i++) { -- cgit v1.2.1