This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Library General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
Invite all the given contacts into the channel, or accept requests for channel membership for contacts on the pending local list.
A message may be provided along with the request, which will be sent to the server if supported. See the CHANNEL_GROUP_FLAG_MESSAGE_ADD and CHANNEL_GROUP_FLAG_MESSAGE_ACCEPT flags to see in which cases this message should be provided.
The members of this group have handles which are specific to this channel, and are not valid as general-purpose handles on the connection. Depending on the channel, it may be possible to call GetHandleOwners to find the owners of these handles, which should be done if you wish to eg subscribe to the contact's presence.
Connection managers must ensure that any given handle is not simultaneously a general-purpose handle and a channel-specific handle.
If members are removed with this reason code, the change is because the group has split into unconnected parts which can only communicate within themselves (e.g. netsplits on IRC use this reason code).
If members are added with this reason code, the change is because unconnected parts of the group have rejoined. If this channel carries messages (e.g. Text or Tubes channels) applications must assume that the contacts being added are likely to have missed some messages as a result of the separation, and that the contacts in the group are likely to have missed some messages from the contacts being added.
Note that from the added contacts' perspective, they have been in the group all along, and the contacts we indicate to be in the group (including the local user) have just rejoined the group with reason Separated. Application protocols in Tubes should be prepared to cope with this situation.
Interface for channels which have multiple members, and where the members of the channel can change during its lifetime. Your presence in the channel cannot be presumed by the channel's existence (for example, a channel you may request membership of but your request may not be granted).
This interface implements three lists: a list of current members, and two lists of local pending and remote pending members. Contacts on the remote pending list have been invited to the channel, but the remote user has not accepted the invitation. Contacts on the local pending list have requested membership of the channel, but the local user of the framework must accept their request before they may join. A single contact should never appear on more than one of the three lists. The lists are empty when the channel is created, and the MembersChanged signal should be emitted when information is retrieved from the server, or changes occur.
Addition of members to the channel may be requested by using AddMembers. If remote acknowledgement is required, use of the AddMembers method will cause users to appear on the remote pending list. If no acknowledgement is required, AddMembers will add contacts to the member list directly. If a contact is awaiting authorisation on the local pending list, AddMembers will grant their membership request.
Removal of contacts from the channel may be requested by using RemoveMembers. If a contact is awaiting authorisation on the local pending list, RemoveMembers will refuse their membership request. If a contact is on the remote pending list but has not yet accepted the invitation, RemoveMembers will rescind the request if possible.
It should not be presumed that the requester of a channel implementing this interface is immediately granted membership, or indeed that they are a member at all, unless they appear in the list. They may, for instance, be placed into the remote pending list until a connection has been established or the request acknowledged remotely.
If the local user joins a Group channel whose members or other state cannot be discovered until the user joins (e.g. many chat room implementations), the connection manager should ensure that the channel is, as far as possible, in a consistent state before adding the local contact to the members set; until this happens, the local contact should be in the remote-pending set. For instance, if the connection manager queries the server to find out the initial members list for the channel, it should leave the local contact in the remote-pending set until it has finished receiving the initial members list.
If the protocol provides no reliable way to tell whether the complete initial members list has been received yet, the connection manager should make a best-effort attempt to wait for the full list (in the worst case, waiting for a suitable arbitrary timeout) rather than requiring user interfaces to do so on its behalf.