From 7d14ee443ca674314e0fe5c3e25f48e52a8fd5ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:40:13 -0700 Subject: dm: core: Use dev_has_ofnode() instead of dev_of_valid() We have two functions which do the same thing. Standardise on dev_has_ofnode() since there is no such thing as an 'invalid' ofnode in normal operation: it is either null or missing. Also move the functions into one place. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko --- include/dm/device.h | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/dm/device.h') diff --git a/include/dm/device.h b/include/dm/device.h index b15a14ec33..4a1224bcc2 100644 --- a/include/dm/device.h +++ b/include/dm/device.h @@ -192,6 +192,17 @@ static inline void dev_bic_flags(struct udevice *dev, u32 bic) dev->flags_ &= ~bic; } +/** + * dev_ofnode() - get the DT node reference associated with a udevice + * + * @dev: device to check + * @return reference of the the device's DT node + */ +static inline ofnode dev_ofnode(const struct udevice *dev) +{ + return dev->node; +} + /* Returns non-zero if the device is active (probed and not removed) */ #define device_active(dev) (dev_get_flags(dev) & DM_FLAG_ACTIVATED) @@ -200,7 +211,7 @@ static inline int dev_of_offset(const struct udevice *dev) return ofnode_to_offset(dev->node); } -static inline bool dev_has_ofnode(struct udevice *dev) +static inline bool dev_has_ofnode(const struct udevice *dev) { return ofnode_valid(dev->node); } -- cgit v1.2.1