diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/tutorials/007/page06.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/tutorials/007/page06.html | 272 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 272 deletions
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/007/page06.html b/docs/tutorials/007/page06.html deleted file mode 100644 index 3c2fdd30357..00000000000 --- a/docs/tutorials/007/page06.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,272 +0,0 @@ -<HTML> -<HEAD> - <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> - <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozilla/4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.32 i486) [Netscape]"> - <META NAME="Author" CONTENT="James CE Johnson"> - <META NAME="Description" CONTENT="A first step towards using ACE productively"> - <TITLE>ACE Tutorial 007</TITLE> -</HEAD> -<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" LINK="#000FFF" VLINK="#FF0F0F"> - -<CENTER><B><FONT SIZE=+2>ACE Tutorial 007</FONT></B></CENTER> - -<CENTER><B><FONT SIZE=+2>Creating a thread-pool server</FONT></B></CENTER> - - -<P> -<HR WIDTH="100%"> - -<P><A HREF="client_handler.cpp">client_handler.cpp</A> -shows some of the changes due to the thread-pool. Just a few -though. - -<P> -<HR WIDTH="100%"> -<pre><FONT FACE="Arial,Helvetica"> -/* - Since this is the third time we've seen most of this, I'm going to strip out almost - all of the comments that you've already seen. That way, you can concentrate on the - new items. - */ - -#include "client_acceptor.h" -#include "client_handler.h" - -/* - We're going to be registering and unregistering a couple of times. To make sure that - we use the same flags every time, I've created these handy macros. - */ -#define REGISTER_MASK ACE_Event_Handler::READ_MASK -#define REMOVE_MASK (ACE_Event_Handler::READ_MASK | ACE_Event_Handler::DONT_CALL) - -/* - Our constructor still doesn't really do anything. We simply initialize the acceptor - pointer to "null" and get our current thread id. The static self() method of ACE_Thread - will return you a thread id native to your platform. - */ -Client_Handler::Client_Handler (void) - : client_acceptor_(0) - ,creator_(ACE_Thread::self()) -{ -} - -Client_Handler::~Client_Handler (void) -{ - this->peer().close(); -} - -/* - Query our acceptor for the concurrency strategy. Notice that we don't bother - to check that our acceptor pointer is valid. That is proably a bad idea... - */ -int Client_Handler::concurrency(void) -{ - return this->client_acceptor()->concurrency(); -} - -/* - And here we ask the acceptor about the thread pool. - */ -Thread_Pool * Client_Handler::thread_pool(void) -{ - return this->client_acceptor()->thread_pool(); -} - -/* - Back to our open() method. This is straight out of Tutorial 6. There's - nothing additional here for the thread-pool implementation. - */ -int Client_Handler::open (void *_acceptor) -{ - client_acceptor( (Client_Acceptor *) _acceptor ); - - if( concurrency() == Client_Acceptor::thread_per_connection_ ) - { - return this->activate(); - } - - this->reactor (client_acceptor()->reactor ()); - - ACE_INET_Addr addr; - - if (this->peer ().get_remote_addr (addr) == -1) - { - return -1; - } - - if (this->reactor ()->register_handler (this, REGISTER_MASK) == -1) - { - ACE_ERROR_RETURN ((LM_ERROR, "(%P|%t) can't register with reactor\n"), -1); - } - - ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, "(%P|%t) connected with %s\n", addr.get_host_name ())); - - return 0; -} - -/* - The destroy() method will remove us from the reactor (with the - DONT_CALL flag set!) and then free our memory. This allows us to - be closed from outside of the reactor context without any danger. - */ -void Client_Handler::destroy (void) -{ - this->reactor ()->remove_handler (this, REMOVE_MASK ); - delete this; -} - -/* - As mentioned in the header, the typical way to close an object in a - threaded context is to invoke it's close() method. We use the - destroy() method to clean up after ourselves. -*/ -int Client_Handler::close(u_long flags) -{ - this->destroy(); - - /* - Don't forward the close() to the baseclass! handle_close() above has - already taken care of delete'ing. Forwarding close() would cause that - to happen again and things would get really ugly at that point! - */ - return 0; -} - -/* - We will be called when handle_input() returns -1. That's our queue - to delete ourselves to prevent memory leaks. - */ -int Client_Handler::handle_close (ACE_HANDLE _handle, ACE_Reactor_Mask _mask) -{ - ACE_UNUSED_ARG (_handle); - ACE_UNUSED_ARG (_mask); - - delete this; - - return 0; -} - -/* - In the open() method, we registered with the reactor and requested to be - notified when there is data to be read. When the reactor sees that activity - it will invoke this handle_input() method on us. As I mentioned, the _handle - parameter isn't useful to us but it narrows the list of methods the reactor - has to worry about and the list of possible virtual functions we would have - to override. - - You've read that much before... Now we have to do some extra stuff in case - we're using the thread-pool implementation. If we're called by our creator - thread then we must be in the reactor. In that case, we arrange to be put - into the thread pool. If we're not in the creator thread then we must be - in the thread pool and we can do some work. - */ -int Client_Handler::handle_input (ACE_HANDLE _handle) -{ - ACE_UNUSED_ARG (_handle); - - /* - Check our strategy. If we're using the thread pool and we're in the creation - thread then we know we were called by the reactor. - */ - if( concurrency() == Client_Acceptor::thread_pool_ ) - { - if( ACE_OS::thr_equal(ACE_Thread::self(),creator_) ) - { - /* - Remove ourselves from the reactor and ask to be put into the thread pool's - queue of work. (You should be able to use suspend_handler() but I've had - problems with that.) - */ - this->reactor()->remove_handler( this, REMOVE_MASK ); - return this->thread_pool()->enqueue(this); - } - } - - /* - Any strategy other than thread-per-connection will eventually get here. If we're in the - single-threaded implementation or the thread-pool, we still have to pass this way. - */ - - char buf[128]; - ACE_OS::memset (buf, 0, sizeof (buf)); - - /* - Invoke the process() method to do the work but save it's return value instead - of returning it immediately. - */ - - int rval = this->process(buf,sizeof(buf)); - - /* - Now, we look again to see if we're in the thread-pool implementation. If so then we - need to re-register ourselves with the reactor so that we can get more work when it - is available. (If suspend_handler() worked then we would use resume_handler() here.) - */ - if( concurrency() == Client_Acceptor::thread_pool_ ) - { - if( rval != -1 ) - { - this->reactor()->register_handler( this, REGISTER_MASK ); - } - } - - /* - Return the result of process() - */ - return(rval); -} - -/* - Remember that when we leave our svc() method, the framework will take care - of calling our close() method so that we can cleanup after ourselves. - */ -int Client_Handler::svc(void) -{ - char buf[128]; - ACE_OS::memset (buf, 0, sizeof (buf)); - - while( 1 ) - { - if( this->process(buf,sizeof(buf)) == -1 ) - { - return(-1); - } - } - - return(0); -} - -/* - Once again, we see that the application-level logic has not been at all affected - by our choice of threading models. Of course, I'm not sharing data between threads - or anything. We'll leave locking issues for a later tutorial. - */ -int Client_Handler::process (char *_rdbuf, int _rdbuf_len) -{ - switch (this->peer ().recv (_rdbuf, _rdbuf_len)) - { - case -1: - ACE_ERROR_RETURN ((LM_ERROR, "(%P|%t) %p bad read\n", "client"), -1); - case 0: - ACE_ERROR_RETURN ((LM_ERROR, "(%P|%t) closing daemon (fd = %d)\n", this->get_handle ()), -1); - default: - ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, "(%P|%t) from client: %s", _rdbuf)); - } - - return 0; -} -</pre> -<HR WIDTH="100%"> - -<P>Ok, now we've gone and changed handle_input() so that it knows when -to do work and when to enqueue itself. Beyond that, we're still about -the same. - -<P> -<HR WIDTH="100%"> -<CENTER>[<A HREF="..">Tutorial -Index</A>] [<A HREF="page07.html">Continue -This Tutorial</A>]</CENTER> - -</BODY> -</HTML> |