diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gprof/gprof.texi')
| -rw-r--r-- | gprof/gprof.texi | 2028 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2028 deletions
diff --git a/gprof/gprof.texi b/gprof/gprof.texi deleted file mode 100644 index b4606b42f4b..00000000000 --- a/gprof/gprof.texi +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2028 +0,0 @@ -\input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*- -@setfilename gprof.info -@settitle GNU gprof -@setchapternewpage odd - -@ifinfo -@c This is a dir.info fragment to support semi-automated addition of -@c manuals to an info tree. zoo@cygnus.com is developing this facility. -@format -START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY -* gprof: (gprof). Profiling your program's execution -END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY -@end format -@end ifinfo - -@ifinfo -This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system. - -Copyright (C) 1988, 1992, 1997, 1998, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - -Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of -this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice -are preserved on all copies. - -@ignore -Permission is granted to process this file through Tex and print the -results, provided the printed document carries copying permission -notice identical to this one except for the removal of this paragraph -(this paragraph not being relevant to the printed manual). - -@end ignore -Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this -manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire -resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission -notice identical to this one. - -Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual -into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions. -@end ifinfo - -@finalout -@smallbook - -@titlepage -@title GNU gprof -@subtitle The @sc{gnu} Profiler -@author Jay Fenlason and Richard Stallman - -@page - -This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you -can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the -execution time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and -execute programs. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason. - -This manual was edited January 1993 by Jeffrey Osier -and updated September 1997 by Brent Baccala. - -@vskip 0pt plus 1filll -Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1992, 1997, 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - -Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of -this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice -are preserved on all copies. - -@ignore -Permission is granted to process this file through TeX and print the -results, provided the printed document carries copying permission -notice identical to this one except for the removal of this paragraph -(this paragraph not being relevant to the printed manual). - -@end ignore -Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this -manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire -resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission -notice identical to this one. - -Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual -into another language, under the same conditions as for modified versions. - -@end titlepage - -@ifinfo -@node Top -@top Profiling a Program: Where Does It Spend Its Time? - -This manual describes the @sc{gnu} profiler, @code{gprof}, and how you -can use it to determine which parts of a program are taking most of the -execution time. We assume that you know how to write, compile, and -execute programs. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} was written by Jay Fenlason. - -This manual was updated August 1997 by Brent Baccala. - -@menu -* Introduction:: What profiling means, and why it is useful. - -* Compiling:: How to compile your program for profiling. -* Executing:: Executing your program to generate profile data -* Invoking:: How to run @code{gprof}, and its options - -* Output:: Interpreting @code{gprof}'s output - -* Inaccuracy:: Potential problems you should be aware of -* How do I?:: Answers to common questions -* Incompatibilities:: (between @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Unix @code{gprof}.) -* Details:: Details of how profiling is done -@end menu -@end ifinfo - -@node Introduction -@chapter Introduction to Profiling - -Profiling allows you to learn where your program spent its time and which -functions called which other functions while it was executing. This -information can show you which pieces of your program are slower than you -expected, and might be candidates for rewriting to make your program -execute faster. It can also tell you which functions are being called more -or less often than you expected. This may help you spot bugs that had -otherwise been unnoticed. - -Since the profiler uses information collected during the actual execution -of your program, it can be used on programs that are too large or too -complex to analyze by reading the source. However, how your program is run -will affect the information that shows up in the profile data. If you -don't use some feature of your program while it is being profiled, no -profile information will be generated for that feature. - -Profiling has several steps: - -@itemize @bullet -@item -You must compile and link your program with profiling enabled. -@xref{Compiling}. - -@item -You must execute your program to generate a profile data file. -@xref{Executing}. - -@item -You must run @code{gprof} to analyze the profile data. -@xref{Invoking}. -@end itemize - -The next three chapters explain these steps in greater detail. - -Several forms of output are available from the analysis. - -The @dfn{flat profile} shows how much time your program spent in each function, -and how many times that function was called. If you simply want to know -which functions burn most of the cycles, it is stated concisely here. -@xref{Flat Profile}. - -The @dfn{call graph} shows, for each function, which functions called it, which -other functions it called, and how many times. There is also an estimate -of how much time was spent in the subroutines of each function. This can -suggest places where you might try to eliminate function calls that use a -lot of time. @xref{Call Graph}. - -The @dfn{annotated source} listing is a copy of the program's -source code, labeled with the number of times each line of the -program was executed. @xref{Annotated Source}. - -To better understand how profiling works, you may wish to read -a description of its implementation. -@xref{Implementation}. - -@node Compiling -@chapter Compiling a Program for Profiling - -The first step in generating profile information for your program is -to compile and link it with profiling enabled. - -To compile a source file for profiling, specify the @samp{-pg} option when -you run the compiler. (This is in addition to the options you normally -use.) - -To link the program for profiling, if you use a compiler such as @code{cc} -to do the linking, simply specify @samp{-pg} in addition to your usual -options. The same option, @samp{-pg}, alters either compilation or linking -to do what is necessary for profiling. Here are examples: - -@example -cc -g -c myprog.c utils.c -pg -cc -o myprog myprog.o utils.o -pg -@end example - -The @samp{-pg} option also works with a command that both compiles and links: - -@example -cc -o myprog myprog.c utils.c -g -pg -@end example - -If you run the linker @code{ld} directly instead of through a compiler -such as @code{cc}, you may have to specify a profiling startup file -@file{gcrt0.o} as the first input file instead of the usual startup -file @file{crt0.o}. In addition, you would probably want to -specify the profiling C library, @file{libc_p.a}, by writing -@samp{-lc_p} instead of the usual @samp{-lc}. This is not absolutely -necessary, but doing this gives you number-of-calls information for -standard library functions such as @code{read} and @code{open}. For -example: - -@example -ld -o myprog /lib/gcrt0.o myprog.o utils.o -lc_p -@end example - -If you compile only some of the modules of the program with @samp{-pg}, you -can still profile the program, but you won't get complete information about -the modules that were compiled without @samp{-pg}. The only information -you get for the functions in those modules is the total time spent in them; -there is no record of how many times they were called, or from where. This -will not affect the flat profile (except that the @code{calls} field for -the functions will be blank), but will greatly reduce the usefulness of the -call graph. - -If you wish to perform line-by-line profiling, -you will also need to specify the @samp{-g} option, -instructing the compiler to insert debugging symbols into the program -that match program addresses to source code lines. -@xref{Line-by-line}. - -In addition to the @samp{-pg} and @samp{-g} options, -you may also wish to specify the @samp{-a} option when compiling. -This will instrument -the program to perform basic-block counting. As the program runs, -it will count how many times it executed each branch of each @samp{if} -statement, each iteration of each @samp{do} loop, etc. This will -enable @code{gprof} to construct an annotated source code -listing showing how many times each line of code was executed. - -@node Executing -@chapter Executing the Program - -Once the program is compiled for profiling, you must run it in order to -generate the information that @code{gprof} needs. Simply run the program -as usual, using the normal arguments, file names, etc. The program should -run normally, producing the same output as usual. It will, however, run -somewhat slower than normal because of the time spent collecting and the -writing the profile data. - -The way you run the program---the arguments and input that you give -it---may have a dramatic effect on what the profile information shows. The -profile data will describe the parts of the program that were activated for -the particular input you use. For example, if the first command you give -to your program is to quit, the profile data will show the time used in -initialization and in cleanup, but not much else. - -Your program will write the profile data into a file called @file{gmon.out} -just before exiting. If there is already a file called @file{gmon.out}, -its contents are overwritten. There is currently no way to tell the -program to write the profile data under a different name, but you can rename -the file afterward if you are concerned that it may be overwritten. - -In order to write the @file{gmon.out} file properly, your program must exit -normally: by returning from @code{main} or by calling @code{exit}. Calling -the low-level function @code{_exit} does not write the profile data, and -neither does abnormal termination due to an unhandled signal. - -The @file{gmon.out} file is written in the program's @emph{current working -directory} at the time it exits. This means that if your program calls -@code{chdir}, the @file{gmon.out} file will be left in the last directory -your program @code{chdir}'d to. If you don't have permission to write in -this directory, the file is not written, and you will get an error message. - -Older versions of the @sc{gnu} profiling library may also write a file -called @file{bb.out}. This file, if present, contains an human-readable -listing of the basic-block execution counts. Unfortunately, the -appearance of a human-readable @file{bb.out} means the basic-block -counts didn't get written into @file{gmon.out}. -The Perl script @code{bbconv.pl}, included with the @code{gprof} -source distribution, will convert a @file{bb.out} file into -a format readable by @code{gprof}. - -@node Invoking -@chapter @code{gprof} Command Summary - -After you have a profile data file @file{gmon.out}, you can run @code{gprof} -to interpret the information in it. The @code{gprof} program prints a -flat profile and a call graph on standard output. Typically you would -redirect the output of @code{gprof} into a file with @samp{>}. - -You run @code{gprof} like this: - -@smallexample -gprof @var{options} [@var{executable-file} [@var{profile-data-files}@dots{}]] [> @var{outfile}] -@end smallexample - -@noindent -Here square-brackets indicate optional arguments. - -If you omit the executable file name, the file @file{a.out} is used. If -you give no profile data file name, the file @file{gmon.out} is used. If -any file is not in the proper format, or if the profile data file does not -appear to belong to the executable file, an error message is printed. - -You can give more than one profile data file by entering all their names -after the executable file name; then the statistics in all the data files -are summed together. - -The order of these options does not matter. - -@menu -* Output Options:: Controlling @code{gprof}'s output style -* Analysis Options:: Controlling how @code{gprof} analyses its data -* Miscellaneous Options:: -* Depricated Options:: Options you no longer need to use, but which - have been retained for compatibility -* Symspecs:: Specifying functions to include or exclude -@end menu - -@node Output Options,Analysis Options,,Invoking -@section Output Options - -These options specify which of several output formats -@code{gprof} should produce. - -Many of these options take an optional @dfn{symspec} to specify -functions to be included or excluded. These options can be -specified multiple times, with different symspecs, to include -or exclude sets of symbols. @xref{Symspecs}. - -Specifying any of these options overrides the default (@samp{-p -q}), -which prints a flat profile and call graph analysis -for all functions. - -@table @code - -@item -A[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --annotated-source[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-A} option causes @code{gprof} to print annotated source code. -If @var{symspec} is specified, print output only for matching symbols. -@xref{Annotated Source}. - -@item -b -@itemx --brief -If the @samp{-b} option is given, @code{gprof} doesn't print the -verbose blurbs that try to explain the meaning of all of the fields in -the tables. This is useful if you intend to print out the output, or -are tired of seeing the blurbs. - -@item -C[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --exec-counts[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-C} option causes @code{gprof} to -print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called. -If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally only for matching symbols. - -If the profile data file contains basic-block count records, specifing -the @samp{-l} option, along with @samp{-C}, will cause basic-block -execution counts to be tallied and displayed. - -@item -i -@itemx --file-info -The @samp{-i} option causes @code{gprof} to display summary information -about the profile data file(s) and then exit. The number of histogram, -call graph, and basic-block count records is displayed. - -@item -I @var{dirs} -@itemx --directory-path=@var{dirs} -The @samp{-I} option specifies a list of search directories in -which to find source files. Environment variable @var{GPROF_PATH} -can also be used to convery this information. -Used mostly for annotated source output. - -@item -J[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --no-annotated-source[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-J} option causes @code{gprof} not to -print annotated source code. -If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints annotated source, -but excludes matching symbols. - -@item -L -@itemx --print-path -Normally, source filenames are printed with the path -component suppressed. The @samp{-L} option causes @code{gprof} -to print the full pathname of -source filenames, which is determined -from symbolic debugging information in the image file -and is relative to the directory in which the compiler -was invoked. - -@item -p[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --flat-profile[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-p} option causes @code{gprof} to print a flat profile. -If @var{symspec} is specified, print flat profile only for matching symbols. -@xref{Flat Profile}. - -@item -P[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --no-flat-profile[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-P} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing a flat profile. -If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a flat profile, -but excludes matching symbols. - -@item -q[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --graph[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-q} option causes @code{gprof} to print the call graph analysis. -If @var{symspec} is specified, print call graph only for matching symbols -and their children. -@xref{Call Graph}. - -@item -Q[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --no-graph[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-Q} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress printing the -call graph. -If @var{symspec} is specified, @code{gprof} prints a call graph, -but excludes matching symbols. - -@item -y -@itemx --separate-files -This option affects annotated source output only. -Normally, gprof prints annotated source files -to standard-output. If this option is specified, -annotated source for a file named @file{path/filename} -is generated in the file @file{filename-ann}. - -@item -Z[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --no-exec-counts[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-Z} option causes @code{gprof} not to -print a tally of functions and the number of times each was called. -If @var{symspec} is specified, print tally, but exclude matching symbols. - -@item --function-ordering -The @samp{--function-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a -suggested function ordering for the program based on profiling data. -This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and -cache behavior for the program on systems which support arbitrary -ordering of functions in an executable. - -The exact details of how to force the linker to place functions -in a particular order is system dependent and out of the scope of this -manual. - -@item --file-ordering @var{map_file} -The @samp{--file-ordering} option causes @code{gprof} to print a -suggested .o link line ordering for the program based on profiling data. -This option suggests an ordering which may improve paging, tlb and -cache behavior for the program on systems which do not support arbitrary -ordering of functions in an executable. - -Use of the @samp{-a} argument is highly recommended with this option. - -The @var{map_file} argument is a pathname to a file which provides -function name to object file mappings. The format of the file is similar to -the output of the program @code{nm}. - -@smallexample -@group -c-parse.o:00000000 T yyparse -c-parse.o:00000004 C yyerrflag -c-lang.o:00000000 T maybe_objc_method_name -c-lang.o:00000000 T print_lang_statistics -c-lang.o:00000000 T recognize_objc_keyword -c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_identifier -c-decl.o:00000000 T print_lang_type -@dots{} - -@end group -@end smallexample - -GNU @code{nm} @samp{--extern-only} @samp{--defined-only} @samp{-v} @samp{--print-file-name} can be used to create @var{map_file}. - -@item -T -@itemx --traditional -The @samp{-T} option causes @code{gprof} to print its output in -``traditional'' BSD style. - -@item -w @var{width} -@itemx --width=@var{width} -Sets width of output lines to @var{width}. -Currently only used when printing the function index at the bottom -of the call graph. - -@item -x -@itemx --all-lines -This option affects annotated source output only. -By default, only the lines at the beginning of a basic-block -are annotated. If this option is specified, every line in -a basic-block is annotated by repeating the annotation for the -first line. This behavior is similar to @code{tcov}'s @samp{-a}. - -@item --demangle -@itemx --no-demangle -These options control whether C++ symbol names should be demangled when -printing output. The default is to demangle symbols. The -@code{--no-demangle} option may be used to turn off demangling. - -@end table - -@node Analysis Options,Miscellaneous Options,Output Options,Invoking -@section Analysis Options - -@table @code - -@item -a -@itemx --no-static -The @samp{-a} option causes @code{gprof} to suppress the printing of -statically declared (private) functions. (These are functions whose -names are not listed as global, and which are not visible outside the -file/function/block where they were defined.) Time spent in these -functions, calls to/from them, etc, will all be attributed to the -function that was loaded directly before it in the executable file. -@c This is compatible with Unix @code{gprof}, but a bad idea. -This option affects both the flat profile and the call graph. - -@item -c -@itemx --static-call-graph -The @samp{-c} option causes the call graph of the program to be -augmented by a heuristic which examines the text space of the object -file and identifies function calls in the binary machine code. -Since normal call graph records are only generated when functions are -entered, this option identifies children that could have been called, -but never were. Calls to functions that were not compiled with -profiling enabled are also identified, but only if symbol table -entries are present for them. -Calls to dynamic library routines are typically @emph{not} found -by this option. -Parents or children identified via this heuristic -are indicated in the call graph with call counts of @samp{0}. - -@item -D -@itemx --ignore-non-functions -The @samp{-D} option causes @code{gprof} to ignore symbols which -are not known to be functions. This option will give more accurate -profile data on systems where it is supported (Solaris and HPUX for -example). - -@item -k @var{from}/@var{to} -The @samp{-k} option allows you to delete from the call graph any arcs from -symbols matching symspec @var{from} to those matching symspec @var{to}. - -@item -l -@itemx --line -The @samp{-l} option enables line-by-line profiling, which causes -histogram hits to be charged to individual source code lines, -instead of functions. -If the program was compiled with basic-block counting enabled, -this option will also identify how many times each line of -code was executed. -While line-by-line profiling can help isolate where in a large function -a program is spending its time, it also significantly increases -the running time of @code{gprof}, and magnifies statistical -inaccuracies. -@xref{Sampling Error}. - -@item -m @var{num} -@itemx --min-count=@var{num} -This option affects execution count output only. -Symbols that are executed less than @var{num} times are suppressed. - -@item -n[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --time[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis, -to only propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}. - -@item -N[@var{symspec}] -@itemx --no-time[=@var{symspec}] -The @samp{-n} option causes @code{gprof}, in its call graph analysis, -not to propagate times for symbols matching @var{symspec}. - -@item -z -@itemx --display-unused-functions -If you give the @samp{-z} option, @code{gprof} will mention all -functions in the flat profile, even those that were never called, and -that had no time spent in them. This is useful in conjunction with the -@samp{-c} option for discovering which routines were never called. - -@end table - -@node Miscellaneous Options,Depricated Options,Analysis Options,Invoking -@section Miscellaneous Options - -@table @code - -@item -d[@var{num}] -@itemx --debug[=@var{num}] -The @samp{-d @var{num}} option specifies debugging options. -If @var{num} is not specified, enable all debugging. -@xref{Debugging}. - -@item -O@var{name} -@itemx --file-format=@var{name} -Selects the format of the profile data files. Recognized formats are -@samp{auto} (the default), @samp{bsd}, @samp{4.4bsd}, @samp{magic}, and -@samp{prof} (not yet supported). - -@item -s -@itemx --sum -The @samp{-s} option causes @code{gprof} to summarize the information -in the profile data files it read in, and write out a profile data -file called @file{gmon.sum}, which contains all the information from -the profile data files that @code{gprof} read in. The file @file{gmon.sum} -may be one of the specified input files; the effect of this is to -merge the data in the other input files into @file{gmon.sum}. - -Eventually you can run @code{gprof} again without @samp{-s} to analyze the -cumulative data in the file @file{gmon.sum}. - -@item -v -@itemx --version -The @samp{-v} flag causes @code{gprof} to print the current version -number, and then exit. - -@end table - -@node Depricated Options,Symspecs,Miscellaneous Options,Invoking -@section Depricated Options - -@table @code - -These options have been replaced with newer versions that use symspecs. - -@item -e @var{function_name} -The @samp{-e @var{function}} option tells @code{gprof} to not print -information about the function @var{function_name} (and its -children@dots{}) in the call graph. The function will still be listed -as a child of any functions that call it, but its index number will be -shown as @samp{[not printed]}. More than one @samp{-e} option may be -given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-e} -option. - -@item -E @var{function_name} -The @code{-E @var{function}} option works like the @code{-e} option, but -time spent in the function (and children who were not called from -anywhere else), will not be used to compute the percentages-of-time for -the call graph. More than one @samp{-E} option may be given; only one -@var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-E} option. - -@item -f @var{function_name} -The @samp{-f @var{function}} option causes @code{gprof} to limit the -call graph to the function @var{function_name} and its children (and -their children@dots{}). More than one @samp{-f} option may be given; -only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each @samp{-f} -option. - -@item -F @var{function_name} -The @samp{-F @var{function}} option works like the @code{-f} option, but -only time spent in the function and its children (and their -children@dots{}) will be used to determine total-time and -percentages-of-time for the call graph. More than one @samp{-F} option -may be given; only one @var{function_name} may be indicated with each -@samp{-F} option. The @samp{-F} option overrides the @samp{-E} option. - -@end table - -Note that only one function can be specified with each @code{-e}, -@code{-E}, @code{-f} or @code{-F} option. To specify more than one -function, use multiple options. For example, this command: - -@example -gprof -e boring -f foo -f bar myprogram > gprof.output -@end example - -@noindent -lists in the call graph all functions that were reached from either -@code{foo} or @code{bar} and were not reachable from @code{boring}. - -@node Symspecs,,Depricated Options,Invoking -@section Symspecs - -Many of the output options allow functions to be included or excluded -using @dfn{symspecs} (symbol specifications), which observe the -following syntax: - -@example - filename_containing_a_dot -| funcname_not_containing_a_dot -| linenumber -| ( [ any_filename ] `:' ( any_funcname | linenumber ) ) -@end example - -Here are some sample symspecs: - -@table @samp -@item main.c -Selects everything in file @file{main.c}---the -dot in the string tells gprof to interpret -the string as a filename, rather than as -a function name. To select a file whose -name does not contain a dot, a trailing colon -should be specified. For example, @samp{odd:} is -interpreted as the file named @file{odd}. - -@item main -Selects all functions named @samp{main}. - -Note that there may be multiple instances of the same function name -because some of the definitions may be local (i.e., static). Unless a -function name is unique in a program, you must use the colon notation -explained below to specify a function from a specific source file. - -Sometimes, function names contain dots. In such cases, it is necessary -to add a leading colon to the name. For example, @samp{:.mul} selects -function @samp{.mul}. - -In some object file formats, symbols have a leading underscore. gprof -will normally not print these underscores. However, you must use the -underscore when you name a symbol in a symspec. You can use the -@code{nm} program to see whether symbols have underscores for the object -file format you are using. - -@item main.c:main -Selects function @samp{main} in file @file{main.c}. - -@item main.c:134 -Selects line 134 in file @file{main.c}. -@end table - -@node Output -@chapter Interpreting @code{gprof}'s Output - -@code{gprof} can produce several different output styles, the -most important of which are described below. The simplest output -styles (file information, execution count, and function and file ordering) -are not described here, but are documented with the respective options -that trigger them. -@xref{Output Options}. - -@menu -* Flat Profile:: The flat profile shows how much time was spent - executing directly in each function. -* Call Graph:: The call graph shows which functions called which - others, and how much time each function used - when its subroutine calls are included. -* Line-by-line:: @code{gprof} can analyze individual source code lines -* Annotated Source:: The annotated source listing displays source code - labeled with execution counts -@end menu - - -@node Flat Profile,Call Graph,,Output -@section The Flat Profile -@cindex flat profile - -The @dfn{flat profile} shows the total amount of time your program -spent executing each function. Unless the @samp{-z} option is given, -functions with no apparent time spent in them, and no apparent calls -to them, are not mentioned. Note that if a function was not compiled -for profiling, and didn't run long enough to show up on the program -counter histogram, it will be indistinguishable from a function that -was never called. - -This is part of a flat profile for a small program: - -@smallexample -@group -Flat profile: - -Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. - % cumulative self self total - time seconds seconds calls ms/call ms/call name - 33.34 0.02 0.02 7208 0.00 0.00 open - 16.67 0.03 0.01 244 0.04 0.12 offtime - 16.67 0.04 0.01 8 1.25 1.25 memccpy - 16.67 0.05 0.01 7 1.43 1.43 write - 16.67 0.06 0.01 mcount - 0.00 0.06 0.00 236 0.00 0.00 tzset - 0.00 0.06 0.00 192 0.00 0.00 tolower - 0.00 0.06 0.00 47 0.00 0.00 strlen - 0.00 0.06 0.00 45 0.00 0.00 strchr - 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 main - 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 memcpy - 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 10.11 print - 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 profil - 0.00 0.06 0.00 1 0.00 50.00 report -@dots{} -@end group -@end smallexample - -@noindent -The functions are sorted by first by decreasing run-time spent in them, -then by decreasing number of calls, then alphabetically by name. The -functions @samp{mcount} and @samp{profil} are part of the profiling -aparatus and appear in every flat profile; their time gives a measure of -the amount of overhead due to profiling. - -Just before the column headers, a statement appears indicating -how much time each sample counted as. -This @dfn{sampling period} estimates the margin of error in each of the time -figures. A time figure that is not much larger than this is not -reliable. In this example, each sample counted as 0.01 seconds, -suggesting a 100 Hz sampling rate. -The program's total execution time was 0.06 -seconds, as indicated by the @samp{cumulative seconds} field. Since -each sample counted for 0.01 seconds, this means only six samples -were taken during the run. Two of the samples occured while the -program was in the @samp{open} function, as indicated by the -@samp{self seconds} field. Each of the other four samples -occured one each in @samp{offtime}, @samp{memccpy}, @samp{write}, -and @samp{mcount}. -Since only six samples were taken, none of these values can -be regarded as particularly reliable. -In another run, -the @samp{self seconds} field for -@samp{mcount} might well be @samp{0.00} or @samp{0.02}. -@xref{Sampling Error}, for a complete discussion. - -The remaining functions in the listing (those whose -@samp{self seconds} field is @samp{0.00}) didn't appear -in the histogram samples at all. However, the call graph -indicated that they were called, so therefore they are listed, -sorted in decreasing order by the @samp{calls} field. -Clearly some time was spent executing these functions, -but the paucity of histogram samples prevents any -determination of how much time each took. - -Here is what the fields in each line mean: - -@table @code -@item % time -This is the percentage of the total execution time your program spent -in this function. These should all add up to 100%. - -@item cumulative seconds -This is the cumulative total number of seconds the computer spent -executing this functions, plus the time spent in all the functions -above this one in this table. - -@item self seconds -This is the number of seconds accounted for by this function alone. -The flat profile listing is sorted first by this number. - -@item calls -This is the total number of times the function was called. If the -function was never called, or the number of times it was called cannot -be determined (probably because the function was not compiled with -profiling enabled), the @dfn{calls} field is blank. - -@item self ms/call -This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this -function per call, if this function is profiled. Otherwise, this field -is blank for this function. - -@item total ms/call -This represents the average number of milliseconds spent in this -function and its descendants per call, if this function is profiled. -Otherwise, this field is blank for this function. -This is the only field in the flat profile that uses call graph analysis. - -@item name -This is the name of the function. The flat profile is sorted by this -field alphabetically after the @dfn{self seconds} and @dfn{calls} -fields are sorted. -@end table - -@node Call Graph,Line-by-line,Flat Profile,Output -@section The Call Graph -@cindex call graph - -The @dfn{call graph} shows how much time was spent in each function -and its children. From this information, you can find functions that, -while they themselves may not have used much time, called other -functions that did use unusual amounts of time. - -Here is a sample call from a small program. This call came from the -same @code{gprof} run as the flat profile example in the previous -chapter. - -@smallexample -@group -granularity: each sample hit covers 2 byte(s) for 20.00% of 0.05 seconds - -index % time self children called name - <spontaneous> -[1] 100.0 0.00 0.05 start [1] - 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2] - 0.00 0.00 1/2 on_exit [28] - 0.00 0.00 1/1 exit [59] ------------------------------------------------ - 0.00 0.05 1/1 start [1] -[2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2] - 0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3] ------------------------------------------------ - 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2] -[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3] - 0.00 0.03 8/8 timelocal [6] - 0.00 0.01 1/1 print [9] - 0.00 0.01 9/9 fgets [12] - 0.00 0.00 12/34 strncmp <cycle 1> [40] - 0.00 0.00 8/8 lookup [20] - 0.00 0.00 1/1 fopen [21] - 0.00 0.00 8/8 chewtime [24] - 0.00 0.00 8/16 skipspace [44] ------------------------------------------------ -[4] 59.8 0.01 0.02 8+472 <cycle 2 as a whole> [4] - 0.01 0.02 244+260 offtime <cycle 2> [7] - 0.00 0.00 236+1 tzset <cycle 2> [26] ------------------------------------------------ -@end group -@end smallexample - -The lines full of dashes divide this table into @dfn{entries}, one for each -function. Each entry has one or more lines. - -In each entry, the primary line is the one that starts with an index number -in square brackets. The end of this line says which function the entry is -for. The preceding lines in the entry describe the callers of this -function and the following lines describe its subroutines (also called -@dfn{children} when we speak of the call graph). - -The entries are sorted by time spent in the function and its subroutines. - -The internal profiling function @code{mcount} (@pxref{Flat Profile}) -is never mentioned in the call graph. - -@menu -* Primary:: Details of the primary line's contents. -* Callers:: Details of caller-lines' contents. -* Subroutines:: Details of subroutine-lines' contents. -* Cycles:: When there are cycles of recursion, - such as @code{a} calls @code{b} calls @code{a}@dots{} -@end menu - -@node Primary -@subsection The Primary Line - -The @dfn{primary line} in a call graph entry is the line that -describes the function which the entry is about and gives the overall -statistics for this function. - -For reference, we repeat the primary line from the entry for function -@code{report} in our main example, together with the heading line that -shows the names of the fields: - -@smallexample -@group -index % time self children called name -@dots{} -[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3] -@end group -@end smallexample - -Here is what the fields in the primary line mean: - -@table @code -@item index -Entries are numbered with consecutive integers. Each function -therefore has an index number, which appears at the beginning of its -primary line. - -Each cross-reference to a function, as a caller or subroutine of -another, gives its index number as well as its name. The index number -guides you if you wish to look for the entry for that function. - -@item % time -This is the percentage of the total time that was spent in this -function, including time spent in subroutines called from this -function. - -The time spent in this function is counted again for the callers of -this function. Therefore, adding up these percentages is meaningless. - -@item self -This is the total amount of time spent in this function. This -should be identical to the number printed in the @code{seconds} field -for this function in the flat profile. - -@item children -This is the total amount of time spent in the subroutine calls made by -this function. This should be equal to the sum of all the @code{self} -and @code{children} entries of the children listed directly below this -function. - -@item called -This is the number of times the function was called. - -If the function called itself recursively, there are two numbers, -separated by a @samp{+}. The first number counts non-recursive calls, -and the second counts recursive calls. - -In the example above, the function @code{report} was called once from -@code{main}. - -@item name -This is the name of the current function. The index number is -repeated after it. - -If the function is part of a cycle of recursion, the cycle number is -printed between the function's name and the index number -(@pxref{Cycles}). For example, if function @code{gnurr} is part of -cycle number one, and has index number twelve, its primary line would -be end like this: - -@example -gnurr <cycle 1> [12] -@end example -@end table - -@node Callers, Subroutines, Primary, Call Graph -@subsection Lines for a Function's Callers - -A function's entry has a line for each function it was called by. -These lines' fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but -their meanings are different because of the difference in context. - -For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function -@code{report}, the primary line and one caller-line preceding it, together -with the heading line that shows the names of the fields: - -@smallexample -index % time self children called name -@dots{} - 0.00 0.05 1/1 main [2] -[3] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 report [3] -@end smallexample - -Here are the meanings of the fields in the caller-line for @code{report} -called from @code{main}: - -@table @code -@item self -An estimate of the amount of time spent in @code{report} itself when it was -called from @code{main}. - -@item children -An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report} -when @code{report} was called from @code{main}. - -The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate -of the amount of time spent within calls to @code{report} from @code{main}. - -@item called -Two numbers: the number of times @code{report} was called from @code{main}, -followed by the total number of nonrecursive calls to @code{report} from -all its callers. - -@item name and index number -The name of the caller of @code{report} to which this line applies, -followed by the caller's index number. - -Not all functions have entries in the call graph; some -options to @code{gprof} request the omission of certain functions. -When a caller has no entry of its own, it still has caller-lines -in the entries of the functions it calls. - -If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is -printed between the name and the index number. -@end table - -If the identity of the callers of a function cannot be determined, a -dummy caller-line is printed which has @samp{<spontaneous>} as the -``caller's name'' and all other fields blank. This can happen for -signal handlers. -@c What if some calls have determinable callers' names but not all? -@c FIXME - still relevant? - -@node Subroutines, Cycles, Callers, Call Graph -@subsection Lines for a Function's Subroutines - -A function's entry has a line for each of its subroutines---in other -words, a line for each other function that it called. These lines' -fields correspond to the fields of the primary line, but their meanings -are different because of the difference in context. - -For reference, we repeat two lines from the entry for the function -@code{main}, the primary line and a line for a subroutine, together -with the heading line that shows the names of the fields: - -@smallexample -index % time self children called name -@dots{} -[2] 100.0 0.00 0.05 1 main [2] - 0.00 0.05 1/1 report [3] -@end smallexample - -Here are the meanings of the fields in the subroutine-line for @code{main} -calling @code{report}: - -@table @code -@item self -An estimate of the amount of time spent directly within @code{report} -when @code{report} was called from @code{main}. - -@item children -An estimate of the amount of time spent in subroutines of @code{report} -when @code{report} was called from @code{main}. - -The sum of the @code{self} and @code{children} fields is an estimate -of the total time spent in calls to @code{report} from @code{main}. - -@item called -Two numbers, the number of calls to @code{report} from @code{main} -followed by the total number of nonrecursive calls to @code{report}. -This ratio is used to determine how much of @code{report}'s @code{self} -and @code{children} time gets credited to @code{main}. -@xref{Assumptions}. - -@item name -The name of the subroutine of @code{main} to which this line applies, -followed by the subroutine's index number. - -If the caller is part of a recursion cycle, the cycle number is -printed between the name and the index number. -@end table - -@node Cycles,, Subroutines, Call Graph -@subsection How Mutually Recursive Functions Are Described -@cindex cycle -@cindex recursion cycle - -The graph may be complicated by the presence of @dfn{cycles of -recursion} in the call graph. A cycle exists if a function calls -another function that (directly or indirectly) calls (or appears to -call) the original function. For example: if @code{a} calls @code{b}, -and @code{b} calls @code{a}, then @code{a} and @code{b} form a cycle. - -Whenever there are call paths both ways between a pair of functions, they -belong to the same cycle. If @code{a} and @code{b} call each other and -@code{b} and @code{c} call each other, all three make one cycle. Note that -even if @code{b} only calls @code{a} if it was not called from @code{a}, -@code{gprof} cannot determine this, so @code{a} and @code{b} are still -considered a cycle. - -The cycles are numbered with consecutive integers. When a function -belongs to a cycle, each time the function name appears in the call graph -it is followed by @samp{<cycle @var{number}>}. - -The reason cycles matter is that they make the time values in the call -graph paradoxical. The ``time spent in children'' of @code{a} should -include the time spent in its subroutine @code{b} and in @code{b}'s -subroutines---but one of @code{b}'s subroutines is @code{a}! How much of -@code{a}'s time should be included in the children of @code{a}, when -@code{a} is indirectly recursive? - -The way @code{gprof} resolves this paradox is by creating a single entry -for the cycle as a whole. The primary line of this entry describes the -total time spent directly in the functions of the cycle. The -``subroutines'' of the cycle are the individual functions of the cycle, and -all other functions that were called directly by them. The ``callers'' of -the cycle are the functions, outside the cycle, that called functions in -the cycle. - -Here is an example portion of a call graph which shows a cycle containing -functions @code{a} and @code{b}. The cycle was entered by a call to -@code{a} from @code{main}; both @code{a} and @code{b} called @code{c}. - -@smallexample -index % time self children called name ----------------------------------------- - 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] -[3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3] - 1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4] - 0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5] ----------------------------------------- - 3 a <cycle 1> [5] -[4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4] - 2 a <cycle 1> [5] - 0 0 3/6 c [6] ----------------------------------------- - 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] - 2 b <cycle 1> [4] -[5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5] - 3 b <cycle 1> [4] - 0 0 3/6 c [6] ----------------------------------------- -@end smallexample - -@noindent -(The entire call graph for this program contains in addition an entry for -@code{main}, which calls @code{a}, and an entry for @code{c}, with callers -@code{a} and @code{b}.) - -@smallexample -index % time self children called name - <spontaneous> -[1] 100.00 0 1.93 0 start [1] - 0.16 1.77 1/1 main [2] ----------------------------------------- - 0.16 1.77 1/1 start [1] -[2] 100.00 0.16 1.77 1 main [2] - 1.77 0 1/1 a <cycle 1> [5] ----------------------------------------- - 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] -[3] 91.71 1.77 0 1+5 <cycle 1 as a whole> [3] - 1.02 0 3 b <cycle 1> [4] - 0.75 0 2 a <cycle 1> [5] - 0 0 6/6 c [6] ----------------------------------------- - 3 a <cycle 1> [5] -[4] 52.85 1.02 0 0 b <cycle 1> [4] - 2 a <cycle 1> [5] - 0 0 3/6 c [6] ----------------------------------------- - 1.77 0 1/1 main [2] - 2 b <cycle 1> [4] -[5] 38.86 0.75 0 1 a <cycle 1> [5] - 3 b <cycle 1> [4] - 0 0 3/6 c [6] ----------------------------------------- - 0 0 3/6 b <cycle 1> [4] - 0 0 3/6 a <cycle 1> [5] -[6] 0.00 0 0 6 c [6] ----------------------------------------- -@end smallexample - -The @code{self} field of the cycle's primary line is the total time -spent in all the functions of the cycle. It equals the sum of the -@code{self} fields for the individual functions in the cycle, found -in the entry in the subroutine lines for these functions. - -The @code{children} fields of the cycle's primary line and subroutine lines -count only subroutines outside the cycle. Even though @code{a} calls -@code{b}, the time spent in those calls to @code{b} is not counted in -@code{a}'s @code{children} time. Thus, we do not encounter the problem of -what to do when the time in those calls to @code{b} includes indirect -recursive calls back to @code{a}. - -The @code{children} field of a caller-line in the cycle's entry estimates -the amount of time spent @emph{in the whole cycle}, and its other -subroutines, on the times when that caller called a function in the cycle. - -The @code{calls} field in the primary line for the cycle has two numbers: -first, the number of times functions in the cycle were called by functions -outside the cycle; second, the number of times they were called by -functions in the cycle (including times when a function in the cycle calls -itself). This is a generalization of the usual split into nonrecursive and -recursive calls. - -The @code{calls} field of a subroutine-line for a cycle member in the -cycle's entry says how many time that function was called from functions in -the cycle. The total of all these is the second number in the primary line's -@code{calls} field. - -In the individual entry for a function in a cycle, the other functions in -the same cycle can appear as subroutines and as callers. These lines show -how many times each function in the cycle called or was called from each other -function in the cycle. The @code{self} and @code{children} fields in these -lines are blank because of the difficulty of defining meanings for them -when recursion is going on. - -@node Line-by-line,Annotated Source,Call Graph,Output -@section Line-by-line Profiling - -@code{gprof}'s @samp{-l} option causes the program to perform -@dfn{line-by-line} profiling. In this mode, histogram -samples are assigned not to functions, but to individual -lines of source code. The program usually must be compiled -with a @samp{-g} option, in addition to @samp{-pg}, in order -to generate debugging symbols for tracking source code lines. - -The flat profile is the most useful output table -in line-by-line mode. -The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since -the current version of @code{gprof} does not propagate -call graph arcs from source code lines to the enclosing function. -The call graph does, however, show each line of code -that called each function, along with a count. - -Here is a section of @code{gprof}'s output, without line-by-line profiling. -Note that @code{ct_init} accounted for four histogram hits, and -13327 calls to @code{init_block}. - -@smallexample -Flat profile: - -Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. - % cumulative self self total - time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name - 30.77 0.13 0.04 6335 6.31 6.31 ct_init - - - Call graph (explanation follows) - - -granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds - -index % time self children called name - - 0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long - 0.00 0.00 40/13496 deflate - 0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast - 0.00 0.00 13327/13496 ct_init -[7] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block - -@end smallexample - -Now let's look at some of @code{gprof}'s output from the same program run, -this time with line-by-line profiling enabled. Note that @code{ct_init}'s -four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code - one hit -occured on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385. In the call graph, -note how -@code{ct_init}'s 13327 calls to @code{init_block} are broken down -into one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls -from line 385, and 6525 calls from 387. - -@smallexample -Flat profile: - -Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. - % cumulative self - time seconds seconds calls name - 7.69 0.10 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:349) - 7.69 0.11 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:351) - 7.69 0.12 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:382) - 7.69 0.13 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:385) - - - Call graph (explanation follows) - - -granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds - - % time self children called name - - 0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long (gzip.c:1440) - 0.00 0.00 1/13496 deflate (deflate.c:763) - 0.00 0.00 1/13496 ct_init (trees.c:396) - 0.00 0.00 2/13496 deflate (deflate.c:727) - 0.00 0.00 4/13496 deflate (deflate.c:686) - 0.00 0.00 5/13496 deflate (deflate.c:675) - 0.00 0.00 12/13496 deflate (deflate.c:679) - 0.00 0.00 16/13496 deflate (deflate.c:730) - 0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast (deflate.c:654) - 0.00 0.00 3071/13496 ct_init (trees.c:384) - 0.00 0.00 3730/13496 ct_init (trees.c:385) - 0.00 0.00 6525/13496 ct_init (trees.c:387) -[6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block (trees.c:408) - -@end smallexample - - -@node Annotated Source,,Line-by-line,Output -@section The Annotated Source Listing - -@code{gprof}'s @samp{-A} option triggers an annotated source listing, -which lists the program's source code, each function labeled with the -number of times it was called. You may also need to specify the -@samp{-I} option, if @code{gprof} can't find the source code files. - -Compiling with @samp{gcc @dots{} -g -pg -a} augments your program -with basic-block counting code, in addition to function counting code. -This enables @code{gprof} to determine how many times each line -of code was exeucted. -For example, consider the following function, taken from gzip, -with line numbers added: - -@smallexample - 1 ulg updcrc(s, n) - 2 uch *s; - 3 unsigned n; - 4 @{ - 5 register ulg c; - 6 - 7 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL; - 8 - 9 if (s == NULL) @{ -10 c = 0xffffffffL; -11 @} else @{ -12 c = crc; -13 if (n) do @{ -14 c = crc_32_tab[...]; -15 @} while (--n); -16 @} -17 crc = c; -18 return c ^ 0xffffffffL; -19 @} - -@end smallexample - -@code{updcrc} has at least five basic-blocks. -One is the function itself. The -@code{if} statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks, one -for each branch of the @code{if}. A fourth basic-block results from -the @code{if} on line 13, and the contents of the @code{do} loop form -the fifth basic-block. The compiler may also generate additional -basic-blocks to handle various special cases. - -A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with -@code{gprof -l -A}. I also suggest use of the @samp{-x} option, -which ensures that each line of code is labeled at least once. -Here is @code{updcrc}'s -annotated source listing for a sample @code{gzip} run: - -@smallexample - ulg updcrc(s, n) - uch *s; - unsigned n; - 2 ->@{ - register ulg c; - - static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL; - - 2 -> if (s == NULL) @{ - 1 -> c = 0xffffffffL; - 1 -> @} else @{ - 1 -> c = crc; - 1 -> if (n) do @{ - 26312 -> c = crc_32_tab[...]; -26312,1,26311 -> @} while (--n); - @} - 2 -> crc = c; - 2 -> return c ^ 0xffffffffL; - 2 ->@} -@end smallexample - -In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through -each branch of the @code{if} statement. The body of the @code{do} -loop was executed a total of 26312 times. Note how the @code{while} -statement is annotated. It began execution 26312 times, once for -each iteration through the loop. One of those times (the last time) -it exited, while it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times. - -@node Inaccuracy -@chapter Inaccuracy of @code{gprof} Output - -@menu -* Sampling Error:: Statistical margins of error -* Assumptions:: Estimating children times -@end menu - -@node Sampling Error,Assumptions,,Inaccuracy -@section Statistical Sampling Error - -The run-time figures that @code{gprof} gives you are based on a sampling -process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy. If a function runs -only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling process -ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a pretty good -chance it will actually find that function zero times, or twice. - -By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures -are derived by counting, not -sampling. They are completely accurate and will not vary from run to run -if your program is deterministic. - -The @dfn{sampling period} that is printed at the beginning of the flat -profile says how often samples are taken. The rule of thumb is that a -run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the sampling -period. - -The actual amount of error can be predicted. -For @var{n} samples, the @emph{expected} error -is the square-root of @var{n}. For example, -if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{foo}'s run-time is 1 second, -@var{n} is 100 samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(@var{n}) is 10 samples, so -the expected error in @code{foo}'s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds), -or ten percent of the observed value. -Again, if the sampling period is 0.01 seconds and @code{bar}'s run-time is -100 seconds, @var{n} is 10000 samples, sqrt(@var{n}) is 100 samples, so -the expected error in @code{bar}'s run-time is 1 second, -or one percent of the observed value. -It is likely to -vary this much @emph{on the average} from one profiling run to the next. -(@emph{Sometimes} it will vary more.) - -This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of information. -If the program's @emph{total} run-time is large, a small run-time for one -function does tell you that that function used an insignificant fraction of -the whole program's time. Usually this means it is not worth optimizing. - -One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but similar) -input data so it will take longer. Another way is to combine the data from -several runs, using the @samp{-s} option of @code{gprof}. Here is how: - -@enumerate -@item -Run your program once. - -@item -Issue the command @samp{mv gmon.out gmon.sum}. - -@item -Run your program again, the same as before. - -@item -Merge the new data in @file{gmon.out} into @file{gmon.sum} with this command: - -@example -gprof -s @var{executable-file} gmon.out gmon.sum -@end example - -@item -Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish. - -@item -Analyze the cumulative data using this command: - -@example -gprof @var{executable-file} gmon.sum > @var{output-file} -@end example -@end enumerate - -@node Assumptions,,Sampling Error,Inaccuracy -@section Estimating @code{children} Times - -Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates---for example, the -@code{children} time values and all the the time figures in caller and -subroutine lines. - -There is no direct information about these measurements in the profile -data itself. Instead, @code{gprof} estimates them by making an assumption -about your program that might or might not be true. - -The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to any -function @code{foo} is not correlated with who called @code{foo}. If -@code{foo} used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to @code{foo} came -from @code{a}, then @code{foo} contributes 2 seconds to @code{a}'s -@code{children} time, by assumption. - -This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is far -from true. Suppose that @code{foo} returns very quickly when its argument -is zero; suppose that @code{a} always passes zero as an argument, while -other callers of @code{foo} pass other arguments. In this program, all the -time spent in @code{foo} is in the calls from callers other than @code{a}. -But @code{gprof} has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and -incorrectly charge 2 seconds of time in @code{foo} to the children of -@code{a}. - -@c FIXME - has this been fixed? -We hope some day to put more complete data into @file{gmon.out}, so that -this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how. For the -nonce, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading. - -@node How do I? -@chapter Answers to Common Questions - -@table @asis -@item How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times? - -Compile your program with basic-block counting enabled, run it, then -use the following pipeline: - -@example -gprof -l -C @var{objfile} | sort -k 3 -n -r -@end example - -This listing will show you the lines in your code executed most often, -but not necessarily those that consumed the most time. - -@item How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function? - -Use @code{gprof -l} and lookup the function in the call graph. -The callers will be broken down by function and line number. - -@item How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second? - -Try using a shell script like this one: - -@example -for i in `seq 1 100`; do - fastprog - mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i -done - -gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.* - -gprof fastprog gmon.sum -@end example - -If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts -will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e. a function called once in -each run will appear with a call count of 100). - -@end table - -@node Incompatibilities -@chapter Incompatibilities with Unix @code{gprof} - -@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} and Berkeley Unix @code{gprof} use the same data -file @file{gmon.out}, and provide essentially the same information. But -there are a few differences. - -@itemize @bullet -@item -@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} uses a new, generalized file format with support -for basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms. A magic -cookie and version number allows @code{gprof} to easily identify -new style files. Old BSD-style files can still be read. -@xref{File Format}. - -@item -For a recursive function, Unix @code{gprof} lists the function as a -parent and as a child, with a @code{calls} field that lists the number -of recursive calls. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} omits these lines and puts -the number of recursive calls in the primary line. - -@item -When a function is suppressed from the call graph with @samp{-e}, @sc{gnu} -@code{gprof} still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it. - -@item -@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} accepts the @samp{-k} with its argument -in the form @samp{from/to}, instead of @samp{from to}. - -@item -In the annotated source listing, -if there are multiple basic blocks on the same line, -@sc{gnu} @code{gprof} prints all of their counts, seperated by commas. - -@ignore - it does this now -@item -The function names printed in @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} output do not include -the leading underscores that are added internally to the front of all -C identifiers on many operating systems. -@end ignore - -@item -The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different. @sc{gnu} -@code{gprof} prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the -tables without skipping the blurbs. -@end itemize - -@node Details -@chapter Details of Profiling - -@menu -* Implementation:: How a program collets profiling information -* File Format:: Format of @samp{gmon.out} files -* Internals:: @code{gprof}'s internal operation -* Debugging:: Using @code{gprof}'s @samp{-d} option -@end menu - -@node Implementation,File Format,,Details -@section Implementation of Profiling - -Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is compiled -so that when it is called, it will stash away some information about where -it was called from. From this, the profiler can figure out what function -called it, and can count how many times it was called. This change is made -by the compiler when your program is compiled with the @samp{-pg} option, -which causes every function to call @code{mcount} -(or @code{_mcount}, or @code{__mcount}, depending on the OS and compiler) -as one of its first operations. - -The @code{mcount} routine, included in the profiling library, -is responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table -both its parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent. This is -typically done by examining the stack frame to find both -the address of the child, and the return address in the original parent. -Since this is a very machine-dependant operation, @code{mcount} -itself is typically a short assembly-language stub routine -that extracts the required -information, and then calls @code{__mcount_internal} -(a normal C function) with two arguments - @code{frompc} and @code{selfpc}. -@code{__mcount_internal} is responsible for maintaining -the in-memory call graph, which records @code{frompc}, @code{selfpc}, -and the number of times each of these call arcs was transversed. - -GCC Version 2 provides a magical function (@code{__builtin_return_address}), -which allows a generic @code{mcount} function to extract the -required information from the stack frame. However, on some -architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be -very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version -of @code{mcount} is used for performance reasons. - -Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by using a -special version of the C library. The programs in it are the same as in -the usual C library, but they were compiled with @samp{-pg}. If you -link your program with @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg}, it automatically uses the -profiling version of the library. - -Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and keeping a -histogram of where the program counter happens to be every now and then. -Typically the program counter is looked at around 100 times per second of -run time, but the exact frequency may vary from system to system. - -This is done is one of two ways. Most UNIX-like operating systems -provide a @code{profil()} system call, which registers a memory -array with the kernel, along with a scale -factor that determines how the program's address space maps -into the array. -Typical scaling values cause every 2 to 8 bytes of address space -to map into a single array slot. -On every tick of the system clock -(assuming the profiled program is running), the value of the -program counter is examined and the corresponding slot in -the memory array is incremented. Since this is done in the kernel, -which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle the clock -interrupt, very little additional system overhead is required. - -However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and earlier), -do not provide a @code{profil()} system call. On such a system, -arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver -a signal to the process (typically via @code{setitimer()}), -which then performs the same operation of examining the -program counter and incrementing a slot in the memory array. -Since this method requires a signal to be delivered to -user space every time a sample is taken, it uses considerably -more overhead than kernel-based profiling. Also, due to the -added delay required to deliver the signal, this method is -less accurate as well. - -A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and -either calls @code{profil()} or sets up -a clock signal handler. -This routine (@code{monstartup}) can be invoked in several ways. -On Linux systems, a special profiling startup file @code{gcrt0.o}, -which invokes @code{monstartup} before @code{main}, -is used instead of the default @code{crt0.o}. -Use of this special startup file is one of the effects -of using @samp{gcc @dots{} -pg} to link. -On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used. -Rather, the @code{mcount} routine, when it is invoked for -the first time (typically when @code{main} is called), -calls @code{monstartup}. - -If the compiler's @samp{-a} option was used, basic-block counting -is also enabled. Each object file is then compiled with a static array -of counts, initially zero. -In the executable code, every time a new basic-block begins -(i.e. when an @code{if} statement appears), an extra instruction -is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the array. -At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded -the starting address of each basic-block. Taken together, -the two arrays record the starting address of every basic-block, -along with the number of times it was executed. - -The profiling library also includes a function (@code{mcleanup}) which is -typically registered using @code{atexit()} to be called as the -program exits, and is responsible for writing the file @file{gmon.out}. -Profiling is turned off, various headers are output, and the histogram -is written, followed by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts. - -The output from @code{gprof} gives no indication of parts of your program that -are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth. This is because samples of the -program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's run time. -Therefore, the -time measurements in @code{gprof} output say nothing about time that your -program was not running. For example, a part of the program that creates -so much data that it cannot all fit in physical memory at once may run very -slowly due to thrashing, but @code{gprof} will say it uses little time. On -the other hand, sampling by run time has the advantage that the amount of -load due to other users won't directly affect the output you get. - -@node File Format,Internals,Implementation,Details -@section Profiling Data File Format - -The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not contain a -magic cookie that allows to check whether a data file really is a -gprof file. Furthermore, it does not provide a version number, thus -rendering changes to the file format almost impossible. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} -uses a new file format that provides these features. For backward -compatibility, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} continues to support the old BSD-derived -format, but not all features are supported with it. For example, -basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old file -format. - -The new file format is defined in header file @file{gmon_out.h}. It -consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number, -as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions. All data -in a profile data file is in the native format of the host on which -the profile was collected. @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} adapts automatically to the -byte-order in use. - -In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of -records. Currently, there are three different record types: histogram -records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count -records. Each file can contain any number of each record type. When -reading a file, @sc{gnu} @code{gprof} will ensure records of the same type are -compatible with each other and compute the union of all records. For -example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum -of all execution counts for each basic-block. - -@subsection Histogram Records - -Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of -bins. The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram -spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD -format, this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the -profiling clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts -represent after being scaled by the profiling clock rate. The -physical dimension is specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15 -characters and a single character abbreviation. For example, a -histogram representing real-time would specify the long name as -"seconds" and the abbreviation as "s". This feature is useful for -architectures that support performance monitor hardware (which, -fortunately, is becoming increasingly common). For example, under DEC -OSF/1, the "uprofile" command can be used to produce a histogram of, -say, instruction cache misses. In this case, the dimension in the -histogram header could be set to "i-cache misses" and the abbreviation -could be set to "1" (because it is simply a count, not a physical -dimension). Also, the profiling rate would have to be set to 1 in -this case. - -Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal -amount of text-space. For example, if the text-segment is one -thousand bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each -bin represents one hundred bytes. - - -@subsection Call-Graph Records - -Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in -the BSD-derived file format. It consists of an arc in the call graph -and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed -during program execution. Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses: -the first must be within caller's function and the second must be -within the callee's function. When performing profiling at the -function level, these addresses can point anywhere within the -respective function. However, when profiling at the line-level, it is -better if the addresses are as close to the call-site/entry-point as -possible. This will ensure that the line-level call-graph is able to -identify exactly which line of source code performed calls to a -function. - -@subsection Basic-Block Execution Count Records - -Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a -sequence of address/count pairs. The header simply specifies the -length of the sequence. In an address/count pair, the address -identifies a basic-block and the count specifies the number of times -that basic-block was executed. Any address within the basic-address can -be used. - -@node Internals,Debugging,File Format,Details -@section @code{gprof}'s Internal Operation - -Like most programs, @code{gprof} begins by processing its options. -During this stage, it may building its symspec list -(@code{sym_ids.c:sym_id_add}), if -options are specified which use symspecs. -@code{gprof} maintains a single linked list of symspecs, -which will eventually get turned into 12 symbol tables, -organized into six include/exclude pairs - one -pair each for the flat profile (INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT), -the call graph arcs (INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS), -printing in the call graph (INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH), -timing propagation in the call graph (INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME), -the annotated source listing (INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO), -and the execution count listing (INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC). - -After option processing, @code{gprof} finishes -building the symspec list by adding all the symspecs in -@code{default_excluded_list} to the exclude lists -EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is specified, -EXCL_FLAT as well. -These default excludes are not added to EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC. - -Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file, -verify that it is an object file, -and read its symbol table (@code{core.c:core_init}), -using @code{bfd_canonicalize_symtab} after mallocing -an appropiate sized array of asymbols. At this point, -function mappings are read (if the @samp{--file-ordering} option -has been specified), and the core text space is read into -memory (if the @samp{-c} option was given). - -@code{gprof}'s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures, -is now built. -This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending -on whether line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option) has been -enabled. -For normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned. -For line-by-line profiling, every -text space address is examined, and a new symbol table entry -gets created every time the line number changes. -In either case, two passes are made through the symbol -table - one to count the size of the symbol table required, -and the other to actually read the symbols. In between the -two passes, a single array of type @code{Sym} is created of -the appropiate length. -Finally, @code{symtab.c:symtab_finalize} -is called to sort the symbol table and remove duplicate entries -(entries with the same memory address). - -The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons. -First, the @code{qsort} library function (which sorts an array) -will be used to sort the symbol table. -Also, the symbol lookup routine (@code{symtab.c:sym_lookup}), -which finds symbols -based on memory address, uses a binary search algorithm -which requires the symbol table to be a sorted array. -Function symbols are indicated with an @code{is_func} flag. -Line number symbols have no special flags set. -Additionally, a symbol can have an @code{is_static} flag -to indicate that it is a local symbol. - -With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated -into Syms (@code{sym_ids.c:sym_id_parse}). Remember that a single -symspec can match multiple symbols. -An array of symbol tables -(@code{syms}) is created, each entry of which is a symbol table -of Syms to be included or excluded from a particular listing. -The master symbol table and the symspecs are examined by nested -loops, and every symbol that matches a symspec is inserted -into the appropriate syms table. This is done twice, once to -count the size of each required symbol table, and again to build -the tables, which have been malloced between passes. -From now on, to determine whether a symbol is on an include -or exclude symspec list, @code{gprof} simply uses its -standard symbol lookup routine on the appropriate table -in the @code{syms} array. - -Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read -(@code{gmon_io.c:gmon_out_read}), -first by checking for a new-style @samp{gmon.out} header, -then assuming this is an old-style BSD @samp{gmon.out} -if the magic number test failed. - -New-style histogram records are read by @code{hist.c:hist_read_rec}. -For the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold -all the bins, and read them in. -When multiple profile data files (or files with multiple histogram -records) are read, the starting address, ending address, number -of bins and sampling rate must match between the various histograms, -or a fatal error will result. -If everything matches, just sum the additional histograms into -the existing in-memory array. - -As each call graph record is read (@code{call_graph.c:cg_read_rec}), -the parent and child addresses -are matched to symbol table entries, and a call graph arc is -created by @code{cg_arcs.c:arc_add}, unless the arc fails a symspec -check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS. As each arc is added, -a linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's -parent arcs. -Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are -incremented by the record's call count. - -Basic-block records are read (@code{basic_blocks.c:bb_read_rec}), -but only if line-by-line profiling has been selected. -Each basic-block address is matched to a corresponding line -symbol in the symbol table, and an entry made in the symbol's -bb_addr and bb_calls arrays. Again, if multiple basic-block -records are present for the same address, the call counts -are cumulative. - -A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested (@code{gmon_io.c:gmon_out_write}). - -If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols -(@code{hist.c:hist_assign_samples}) by iterating over all the sample -bins and assigning them to symbols. Since the symbol table -is sorted in order of ascending memory addresses, we can -simple follow along in the symbol table as we make our pass -over the sample bins. -This step includes a symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT. -Depending on the histogram -scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols, -in which case a fraction of the sample count is allocated -to each symbol, proportional to the degree of overlap. -This effect is rare for normal profiling, but overlaps -are more common during line-by-line profiling, and can -cause each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half -a hit, for example. - -If call graph data is present, @code{cg_arcs.c:cg_assemble} is called. -First, if @samp{-c} was specified, a machine-dependant -routine (@code{find_call}) scans through each symbol's machine code, -looking for subroutine call instructions, and adding them -to the call graph with a zero call count. -A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering -all the symbols (@code{cg_dfn.c:cg_dfn}), so that -children are always numbered less than their parents, -then making a array of pointers into the symbol table and sorting it into -numerical order, which is reverse topological -order (children appear before parents). -Cycles are also detected at this point, all members -of which are assigned the same topological number. -Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol pointers. -The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children), -computes the fraction of child time to propogate to each parent -and a print flag. -The print flag reflects symspec handling of INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH, -with a parent's include or exclude (print or no print) property -being propagated to its children, unless they themselves explicitly appear -in INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH. -A second pass, from beginning to end (children to parents) actually -propogates the timings along the call graph, subject -to a check against INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME. -With the print flag, fractions, and timings now stored in the symbol -structures, the topological sort array is now discarded, and a -new array of pointers is assembled, this time sorted by propagated time. - -Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now fairly -straightforward. The call graph (@code{cg_print.c:cg_print}) and -flat profile (@code{hist.c:hist_print}) are regurgitations of values -already computed. The annotated source listing -(@code{basic_blocks.c:print_annotated_source}) uses basic-block -information, if present, to label each line of code with call counts, -otherwise only the function call counts are presented. - -The function ordering code is marginally well documented -in the source code itself (@code{cg_print.c}). Basically, -the functions with the most use and the most parents are -placed first, followed by other functions with the most use, -followed by lower use functions, followed by unused functions -at the end. - -@node Debugging,,Internals,Details -@subsection Debugging @code{gprof} - -If @code{gprof} was compiled with debugging enabled, -the @samp{-d} option triggers debugging output -(to stdout) which can be helpful in understanding its operation. -The debugging number specified is interpreted as a sum of the following -options: - -@table @asis -@item 2 - Topological sort -Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis -@item 4 - Cycles -Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads -@item 16 - Tallying -As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how -the total calls to each function are tallied -@item 32 - Call graph arc sorting -Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph entry -@item 64 - Reading histogram and call graph records -Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each -call graph arc -@item 128 - Symbol table -Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object file. -For line-by-line profiling (@samp{-l} option), also shows line numbers -being assigned to memory addresses. -@item 256 - Static call graph -Trace operation of @samp{-c} option -@item 512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups -Detail operation of lookup routines -@item 1024 - Call graph propagation -Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph -@item 2048 - Basic-blocks -Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data -(only meaningful with @samp{-l} option) -@item 4096 - Symspecs -Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation -@item 8192 - Annotate source -Tracks operation of @samp{-A} option -@end table - -@contents -@bye - -NEEDS AN INDEX - --T - "traditional BSD style": How is it different? Should the -differences be documented? - -example flat file adds up to 100.01%... - -note: time estimates now only go out to one decimal place (0.0), where -they used to extend two (78.67). |