Initial revision

1 files changed, 846 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c b/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1b0a18d5c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
@@ -0,0 +1,846 @@
+/* BFD support for the ns32k architecture.
+   Copyright (C) 1990, 91, 94, 95, 96, 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Almost totally rewritten by Ian Dall from initial work
+   by Andrew Cagney.
+
+This file is part of BFD, the Binary File Descriptor library.
+
+This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+(at your option) any later version.
+
+This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.  */
+
+#include "bfd.h"
+#include "sysdep.h"
+#include "libbfd.h"
+#include "ns32k.h"
+
+#define N(machine, printable, d, next)  \
+{  32, 32, 8, bfd_arch_ns32k, machine, "ns32k",printable,3,d,bfd_default_compatible,bfd_default_scan, next, }
+
+static const bfd_arch_info_type arch_info_struct[] =
+{ 
+  N(32532,"ns32k:32532",true, 0), /* the word ns32k will match this too */
+};
+
+const bfd_arch_info_type bfd_ns32k_arch =
+  N(32032,"ns32k:32032",false, &arch_info_struct[0]);
+
+static long
+ns32k_sign_extend(value, bits)
+     int value;
+     int bits;
+{
+  value = value & ((1 << bits) - 1);
+  return (value & (1 << (bits-1))
+	  ? value | (~((1 << bits) - 1))
+	  : value);
+}
+
+long
+_bfd_ns32k_get_displacement(buffer, offset, size)
+     bfd_byte *buffer;
+     long offset;
+     long size;
+{
+  long value;
+  buffer += offset;
+  switch (size)
+    {
+    case 1:
+      value = ns32k_sign_extend (*buffer, 7);
+      break;
+    case 2:
+      value = ns32k_sign_extend(*buffer++, 6);
+      value = (value << 8) | (0xff & *buffer);
+      break;
+    case 4:
+      value = ns32k_sign_extend(*buffer++, 6);
+      value = (value << 8) | (0xff & *buffer++);
+      value = (value << 8) | (0xff & *buffer++);
+      value = (value << 8) | (0xff & *buffer);
+      break;
+    default:
+      abort ();
+      return 0;
+    }
+  return value;
+}
+
+int
+_bfd_ns32k_put_displacement(value, buffer, offset, size)
+     long value;
+     bfd_byte *buffer;
+     long offset;
+     long size;
+{
+  buffer += offset;
+  switch (size)
+    {
+    case 1:
+      if (value < -64 || value > 63)
+	return -1;
+      value&=0x7f;
+      *buffer++=value;
+      break;
+    case 2:
+      if (value < -8192 || value > 8191)
+	return -1;
+      value&=0x3fff;
+      value|=0x8000;
+      *buffer++=(value>>8);
+      *buffer++=value;
+      break;
+    case 4:
+      if (value < -0x1f000000 || value >= 0x20000000)
+	return -1;
+      value|=0xc0000000;
+      *buffer++=(value>>24);
+      *buffer++=(value>>16);
+      *buffer++=(value>>8);
+      *buffer++=value;
+      break;
+    default:
+      return -1;
+  }
+  return 0;
+}
+
+long
+_bfd_ns32k_get_immediate (buffer, offset, size)
+     bfd_byte *buffer;
+     long offset;
+     long size;
+{
+  long value = 0;
+  buffer += offset;
+  switch (size)
+    {
+    case 4:
+      value = (value << 8) | (*buffer++ & 0xff);
+    case 3:
+      value = (value << 8) | (*buffer++ & 0xff);
+    case 2:
+      value = (value << 8) | (*buffer++ & 0xff);
+    case 1:
+      value = (value << 8) | (*buffer++ & 0xff);
+    }
+  return value;
+}
+
+int
+_bfd_ns32k_put_immediate (value, buffer, offset, size)
+     long value;
+     bfd_byte *buffer;
+     long offset;
+     long size;
+{
+  buffer += offset + size - 1;
+  switch (size)
+    {
+    case 4:
+      *buffer-- = (value & 0xff); value >>= 8;
+    case 3:
+      *buffer-- = (value & 0xff); value >>= 8;
+    case 2:
+      *buffer-- = (value & 0xff); value >>= 8;
+    case 1:
+      *buffer-- = (value & 0xff); value >>= 8;
+    }
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* This is just like the standard perform_relocation except we
+ * use get_data and put_data which know about the ns32k
+ * storage methods.
+ * This is probably a lot more complicated than it needs to be!
+ */
+static bfd_reloc_status_type
+do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
+		error_message, get_data, put_data)
+     bfd *abfd;
+     arelent *reloc_entry;
+     struct symbol_cache_entry *symbol;
+     PTR data;
+     asection *input_section;
+     bfd *output_bfd;
+     char **error_message;
+     long (*get_data)();
+     int (*put_data)();
+{
+  int overflow = 0;
+  bfd_vma relocation;
+  bfd_reloc_status_type flag = bfd_reloc_ok;
+  bfd_size_type addr = reloc_entry->address;
+  bfd_vma output_base = 0;
+  reloc_howto_type *howto = reloc_entry->howto;
+  asection *reloc_target_output_section;
+
+  if ((symbol->section == &bfd_abs_section)
+      && output_bfd != (bfd *) NULL)
+    {
+      reloc_entry->address += input_section->output_offset;
+      return bfd_reloc_ok;
+    }
+
+  /* If we are not producing relocateable output, return an error if
+     the symbol is not defined.  An undefined weak symbol is
+     considered to have a value of zero (SVR4 ABI, p. 4-27).  */
+  if (symbol->section == &bfd_und_section
+      && (symbol->flags & BSF_WEAK) == 0
+      && output_bfd == (bfd *) NULL)
+    flag = bfd_reloc_undefined;
+
+
+  /* Is the address of the relocation really within the section?  */
+  if (reloc_entry->address > input_section->_cooked_size)
+    return bfd_reloc_outofrange;
+
+  /* Work out which section the relocation is targetted at and the
+     initial relocation command value.  */
+
+  /* Get symbol value.  (Common symbols are special.)  */
+  if (bfd_is_com_section (symbol->section))
+    relocation = 0;
+  else
+    relocation = symbol->value;
+
+
+  reloc_target_output_section = symbol->section->output_section;
+
+  /* Convert input-section-relative symbol value to absolute.  */
+  if (output_bfd && howto->partial_inplace == false)
+    output_base = 0;
+  else
+    output_base = reloc_target_output_section->vma;
+
+  relocation += output_base + symbol->section->output_offset;
+
+  /* Add in supplied addend.  */
+  relocation += reloc_entry->addend;
+
+  /* Here the variable relocation holds the final address of the
+     symbol we are relocating against, plus any addend.  */
+
+  if (howto->pc_relative == true)
+    {
+      /* This is a PC relative relocation.  We want to set RELOCATION
+	 to the distance between the address of the symbol and the
+	 location.  RELOCATION is already the address of the symbol.
+
+	 We start by subtracting the address of the section containing
+	 the location.
+
+	 If pcrel_offset is set, we must further subtract the position
+	 of the location within the section.  Some targets arrange for
+	 the addend to be the negative of the position of the location
+	 within the section; for example, i386-aout does this.  For
+	 i386-aout, pcrel_offset is false.  Some other targets do not
+	 include the position of the location; for example, m88kbcs,
+	 or ELF.  For those targets, pcrel_offset is true.
+
+	 If we are producing relocateable output, then we must ensure
+	 that this reloc will be correctly computed when the final
+	 relocation is done.  If pcrel_offset is false we want to wind
+	 up with the negative of the location within the section,
+	 which means we must adjust the existing addend by the change
+	 in the location within the section.  If pcrel_offset is true
+	 we do not want to adjust the existing addend at all.
+
+	 FIXME: This seems logical to me, but for the case of
+	 producing relocateable output it is not what the code
+	 actually does.  I don't want to change it, because it seems
+	 far too likely that something will break.  */
+
+      relocation -=
+	input_section->output_section->vma + input_section->output_offset;
+
+      if (howto->pcrel_offset == true)
+	relocation -= reloc_entry->address;
+    }
+
+  if (output_bfd != (bfd *) NULL)
+    {
+      if (howto->partial_inplace == false)
+	{
+	  /* This is a partial relocation, and we want to apply the relocation
+	     to the reloc entry rather than the raw data. Modify the reloc
+	     inplace to reflect what we now know.  */
+	  reloc_entry->addend = relocation;
+	  reloc_entry->address += input_section->output_offset;
+	  return flag;
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  /* This is a partial relocation, but inplace, so modify the
+	     reloc record a bit.
+
+	     If we've relocated with a symbol with a section, change
+	     into a ref to the section belonging to the symbol.  */
+
+	  reloc_entry->address += input_section->output_offset;
+
+	  /* WTF?? */
+	  if (abfd->xvec->flavour == bfd_target_coff_flavour
+	      && strcmp (abfd->xvec->name, "aixcoff-rs6000") != 0)
+	    {
+#if 1
+	      /* For m68k-coff, the addend was being subtracted twice during
+		 relocation with -r.  Removing the line below this comment
+		 fixes that problem; see PR 2953.
+
+However, Ian wrote the following, regarding removing the line below,
+which explains why it is still enabled:  --djm
+
+If you put a patch like that into BFD you need to check all the COFF
+linkers.  I am fairly certain that patch will break coff-i386 (e.g.,
+SCO); see coff_i386_reloc in coff-i386.c where I worked around the
+problem in a different way.  There may very well be a reason that the
+code works as it does.
+
+Hmmm.  The first obvious point is that bfd_perform_relocation should
+not have any tests that depend upon the flavour.  It's seem like
+entirely the wrong place for such a thing.  The second obvious point
+is that the current code ignores the reloc addend when producing
+relocateable output for COFF.  That's peculiar.  In fact, I really
+have no idea what the point of the line you want to remove is.
+
+A typical COFF reloc subtracts the old value of the symbol and adds in
+the new value to the location in the object file (if it's a pc
+relative reloc it adds the difference between the symbol value and the
+location).  When relocating we need to preserve that property.
+
+BFD handles this by setting the addend to the negative of the old
+value of the symbol.  Unfortunately it handles common symbols in a
+non-standard way (it doesn't subtract the old value) but that's a
+different story (we can't change it without losing backward
+compatibility with old object files) (coff-i386 does subtract the old
+value, to be compatible with existing coff-i386 targets, like SCO).
+
+So everything works fine when not producing relocateable output.  When
+we are producing relocateable output, logically we should do exactly
+what we do when not producing relocateable output.  Therefore, your
+patch is correct.  In fact, it should probably always just set
+reloc_entry->addend to 0 for all cases, since it is, in fact, going to
+add the value into the object file.  This won't hurt the COFF code,
+which doesn't use the addend; I'm not sure what it will do to other
+formats (the thing to check for would be whether any formats both use
+the addend and set partial_inplace).
+
+When I wanted to make coff-i386 produce relocateable output, I ran
+into the problem that you are running into: I wanted to remove that
+line.  Rather than risk it, I made the coff-i386 relocs use a special
+function; it's coff_i386_reloc in coff-i386.c.  The function
+specifically adds the addend field into the object file, knowing that
+bfd_perform_relocation is not going to.  If you remove that line, then
+coff-i386.c will wind up adding the addend field in twice.  It's
+trivial to fix; it just needs to be done.
+
+The problem with removing the line is just that it may break some
+working code.  With BFD it's hard to be sure of anything.  The right
+way to deal with this is simply to build and test at least all the
+supported COFF targets.  It should be straightforward if time and disk
+space consuming.  For each target:
+    1) build the linker
+    2) generate some executable, and link it using -r (I would
+       probably use paranoia.o and link against newlib/libc.a, which
+       for all the supported targets would be available in
+       /usr/cygnus/progressive/H-host/target/lib/libc.a).
+    3) make the change to reloc.c
+    4) rebuild the linker
+    5) repeat step 2
+    6) if the resulting object files are the same, you have at least
+       made it no worse
+    7) if they are different you have to figure out which version is
+       right
+*/
+	      relocation -= reloc_entry->addend;
+#endif
+	      reloc_entry->addend = 0;
+	    }
+	  else
+	    {
+	      reloc_entry->addend = relocation;
+	    }
+	}
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      reloc_entry->addend = 0;
+    }
+
+  /* FIXME: This overflow checking is incomplete, because the value
+     might have overflowed before we get here.  For a correct check we
+     need to compute the value in a size larger than bitsize, but we
+     can't reasonably do that for a reloc the same size as a host
+     machine word.
+     FIXME: We should also do overflow checking on the result after
+     adding in the value contained in the object file.  */
+  if (howto->complain_on_overflow != complain_overflow_dont)
+    {
+      bfd_vma check;
+
+      /* Get the value that will be used for the relocation, but
+	 starting at bit position zero.  */
+      if (howto->rightshift > howto->bitpos)
+	check = relocation >> (howto->rightshift - howto->bitpos);
+      else
+	check = relocation << (howto->bitpos - howto->rightshift);
+      switch (howto->complain_on_overflow)
+	{
+	case complain_overflow_signed:
+	  {
+	    /* Assumes two's complement.  */
+	    bfd_signed_vma reloc_signed_max = (1 << (howto->bitsize - 1)) - 1;
+	    bfd_signed_vma reloc_signed_min = ~reloc_signed_max;
+
+	    /* The above right shift is incorrect for a signed value.
+	       Fix it up by forcing on the upper bits.  */
+	    if (howto->rightshift > howto->bitpos
+		&& (bfd_signed_vma) relocation < 0)
+	      check |= ((bfd_vma) - 1
+			& ~((bfd_vma) - 1
+			    >> (howto->rightshift - howto->bitpos)));
+	    if ((bfd_signed_vma) check > reloc_signed_max
+		|| (bfd_signed_vma) check < reloc_signed_min)
+	      flag = bfd_reloc_overflow;
+	  }
+	  break;
+	case complain_overflow_unsigned:
+	  {
+	    /* Assumes two's complement.  This expression avoids
+	       overflow if howto->bitsize is the number of bits in
+	       bfd_vma.  */
+	    bfd_vma reloc_unsigned_max =
+	    (((1 << (howto->bitsize - 1)) - 1) << 1) | 1;
+
+	    if ((bfd_vma) check > reloc_unsigned_max)
+	      flag = bfd_reloc_overflow;
+	  }
+	  break;
+	case complain_overflow_bitfield:
+	  {
+	    /* Assumes two's complement.  This expression avoids
+	       overflow if howto->bitsize is the number of bits in
+	       bfd_vma.  */
+	    bfd_vma reloc_bits = (((1 << (howto->bitsize - 1)) - 1) << 1) | 1;
+
+	    if (((bfd_vma) check & ~reloc_bits) != 0
+		&& ((bfd_vma) check & ~reloc_bits) != (-1 & ~reloc_bits))
+	      {
+		/* The above right shift is incorrect for a signed
+		   value.  See if turning on the upper bits fixes the
+		   overflow.  */
+		if (howto->rightshift > howto->bitpos
+		    && (bfd_signed_vma) relocation < 0)
+		  {
+		    check |= ((bfd_vma) - 1
+			      & ~((bfd_vma) - 1
+				  >> (howto->rightshift - howto->bitpos)));
+		    if (((bfd_vma) check & ~reloc_bits) != (-1 & ~reloc_bits))
+		      flag = bfd_reloc_overflow;
+		  }
+		else
+		  flag = bfd_reloc_overflow;
+	      }
+	  }
+	  break;
+	default:
+	  abort ();
+	}
+    }
+
+  /*
+    Either we are relocating all the way, or we don't want to apply
+    the relocation to the reloc entry (probably because there isn't
+    any room in the output format to describe addends to relocs)
+    */
+
+  /* The cast to bfd_vma avoids a bug in the Alpha OSF/1 C compiler
+     (OSF version 1.3, compiler version 3.11).  It miscompiles the
+     following program:
+
+     struct str
+     {
+       unsigned int i0;
+     } s = { 0 };
+
+     int
+     main ()
+     {
+       unsigned long x;
+
+       x = 0x100000000;
+       x <<= (unsigned long) s.i0;
+       if (x == 0)
+	 printf ("failed\n");
+       else
+	 printf ("succeeded (%lx)\n", x);
+     }
+     */
+
+  relocation >>= (bfd_vma) howto->rightshift;
+
+  /* Shift everything up to where it's going to be used */
+
+  relocation <<= (bfd_vma) howto->bitpos;
+
+  /* Wait for the day when all have the mask in them */
+
+  /* What we do:
+     i instruction to be left alone
+     o offset within instruction
+     r relocation offset to apply
+     S src mask
+     D dst mask
+     N ~dst mask
+     A part 1
+     B part 2
+     R result
+
+     Do this:
+     i i i i i o o o o o        from bfd_get<size>
+     and           S S S S S    to get the size offset we want
+     +   r r r r r r r r r r  to get the final value to place
+     and           D D D D D  to chop to right size
+     -----------------------
+     A A A A A
+     And this:
+     ...   i i i i i o o o o o  from bfd_get<size>
+     and   N N N N N            get instruction
+     -----------------------
+     ...   B B B B B
+
+     And then:
+     B B B B B
+     or              A A A A A
+     -----------------------
+     R R R R R R R R R R        put into bfd_put<size>
+     */
+
+#define DOIT(x) \
+  x = ( (x & ~howto->dst_mask) | (((x & howto->src_mask) +  relocation) & howto->dst_mask))
+
+  switch (howto->size)
+    {
+    case 0:
+      {
+	char x = get_data (data, addr, 1);
+	DOIT (x);
+	overflow = put_data(x, data, addr, 1);
+      }
+      break;
+
+    case 1:
+      if (relocation)
+	{
+	  short x = get_data (data, addr, 2);
+	  DOIT (x);
+	  overflow = put_data(x, (unsigned char *) data, addr, 2);
+	}
+      break;
+    case 2:
+      if (relocation)
+	{
+	  long x = get_data (data, addr, 4);
+	  DOIT (x);
+	  overflow = put_data(x, data, addr, 4);
+	}
+      break;
+    case -2:
+      {
+	long  x = get_data(data, addr, 4);
+	relocation = -relocation;
+	DOIT(x);
+	overflow = put_data(x, data , addr, 4);
+      }
+      break;
+
+    case 3:
+      /* Do nothing */
+      break;
+
+    case 4:
+#ifdef BFD64
+      if (relocation)
+	{
+	  bfd_vma x = get_data (data, addr, 8);
+	  DOIT (x);
+	  overflow = put_data(x, data, addr, 8);
+	}
+#else
+      abort ();
+#endif
+      break;
+    default:
+      return bfd_reloc_other;
+    }
+  if ((howto->complain_on_overflow != complain_overflow_dont) && overflow)
+    return bfd_reloc_overflow;
+
+  return flag;
+}
+
+/* Relocate a given location using a given value and howto.  */
+
+bfd_reloc_status_type
+_bfd_do_ns32k_reloc_contents ( howto, input_bfd, relocation, location,
+			      get_data, put_data)
+     reloc_howto_type *howto;
+     bfd *input_bfd;
+     bfd_vma relocation;
+     bfd_byte *location;
+     long (*get_data)();
+     int (*put_data)();
+{
+  int size;
+  bfd_vma x;
+  boolean overflow;
+
+  /* If the size is negative, negate RELOCATION.  This isn't very
+     general.  */
+  if (howto->size < 0)
+    relocation = -relocation;
+
+  /* Get the value we are going to relocate.  */
+  size = bfd_get_reloc_size (howto);
+  switch (size)
+    {
+    default:
+    case 0:
+      abort ();
+    case 1:
+    case 2:
+    case 4:
+#ifdef BFD64
+    case 8:
+#endif
+      x = get_data (location, 0, size);
+      break;
+    }
+
+  /* Check for overflow.  FIXME: We may drop bits during the addition
+     which we don't check for.  We must either check at every single
+     operation, which would be tedious, or we must do the computations
+     in a type larger than bfd_vma, which would be inefficient.  */
+  overflow = false;
+  if (howto->complain_on_overflow != complain_overflow_dont)
+    {
+      bfd_vma check;
+      bfd_signed_vma signed_check;
+      bfd_vma add;
+      bfd_signed_vma signed_add;
+
+      if (howto->rightshift == 0)
+	{
+	  check = relocation;
+	  signed_check = (bfd_signed_vma) relocation;
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  /* Drop unwanted bits from the value we are relocating to.  */
+	  check = relocation >> howto->rightshift;
+
+	  /* If this is a signed value, the rightshift just dropped
+	     leading 1 bits (assuming twos complement).  */
+	  if ((bfd_signed_vma) relocation >= 0)
+	    signed_check = check;
+	  else
+	    signed_check = (check
+			    | ((bfd_vma) - 1
+			       & ~((bfd_vma) - 1 >> howto->rightshift)));
+	}
+
+      /* Get the value from the object file.  */
+      add = x & howto->src_mask;
+
+      /* Get the value from the object file with an appropriate sign.
+	 The expression involving howto->src_mask isolates the upper
+	 bit of src_mask.  If that bit is set in the value we are
+	 adding, it is negative, and we subtract out that number times
+	 two.  If src_mask includes the highest possible bit, then we
+	 can not get the upper bit, but that does not matter since
+	 signed_add needs no adjustment to become negative in that
+	 case.  */
+      signed_add = add;
+      if ((add & (((~howto->src_mask) >> 1) & howto->src_mask)) != 0)
+	signed_add -= (((~howto->src_mask) >> 1) & howto->src_mask) << 1;
+
+      /* Add the value from the object file, shifted so that it is a
+	 straight number.  */
+      if (howto->bitpos == 0)
+	{
+	  check += add;
+	  signed_check += signed_add;
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  check += add >> howto->bitpos;
+
+	  /* For the signed case we use ADD, rather than SIGNED_ADD,
+	     to avoid warnings from SVR4 cc.  This is OK since we
+	     explictly handle the sign bits.  */
+	  if (signed_add >= 0)
+	    signed_check += add >> howto->bitpos;
+	  else
+	    signed_check += ((add >> howto->bitpos)
+			     | ((bfd_vma) - 1
+				& ~((bfd_vma) - 1 >> howto->bitpos)));
+	}
+
+      switch (howto->complain_on_overflow)
+	{
+	case complain_overflow_signed:
+	  {
+	    /* Assumes two's complement.  */
+	    bfd_signed_vma reloc_signed_max = (1 << (howto->bitsize - 1)) - 1;
+	    bfd_signed_vma reloc_signed_min = ~reloc_signed_max;
+
+	    if (signed_check > reloc_signed_max
+		|| signed_check < reloc_signed_min)
+	      overflow = true;
+	  }
+	  break;
+	case complain_overflow_unsigned:
+	  {
+	    /* Assumes two's complement.  This expression avoids
+	       overflow if howto->bitsize is the number of bits in
+	       bfd_vma.  */
+	    bfd_vma reloc_unsigned_max =
+	    (((1 << (howto->bitsize - 1)) - 1) << 1) | 1;
+
+	    if (check > reloc_unsigned_max)
+	      overflow = true;
+	  }
+	  break;
+	case complain_overflow_bitfield:
+	  {
+	    /* Assumes two's complement.  This expression avoids
+	       overflow if howto->bitsize is the number of bits in
+	       bfd_vma.  */
+	    bfd_vma reloc_bits = (((1 << (howto->bitsize - 1)) - 1) << 1) | 1;
+
+	    if ((check & ~reloc_bits) != 0
+		&& (((bfd_vma) signed_check & ~reloc_bits)
+		    != (-1 & ~reloc_bits)))
+	      overflow = true;
+	  }
+	  break;
+	default:
+	  abort ();
+	}
+    }
+
+  /* Put RELOCATION in the right bits.  */
+  relocation >>= (bfd_vma) howto->rightshift;
+  relocation <<= (bfd_vma) howto->bitpos;
+
+  /* Add RELOCATION to the right bits of X.  */
+  x = ((x & ~howto->dst_mask)
+       | (((x & howto->src_mask) + relocation) & howto->dst_mask));
+
+  /* Put the relocated value back in the object file.  */
+  switch (size)
+    {
+    default:
+    case 0:
+      abort ();
+    case 1:
+    case 2:
+    case 4:
+#ifdef BFD64
+    case 8:
+#endif
+      put_data(x, location, 0, size);
+      break;
+    }
+
+  return overflow ? bfd_reloc_overflow : bfd_reloc_ok;
+}
+
+bfd_reloc_status_type
+_bfd_ns32k_reloc_disp (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section,
+		       output_bfd, error_message)
+     bfd *abfd;
+     arelent *reloc_entry;
+     struct symbol_cache_entry *symbol;
+     PTR data;
+     asection *input_section;
+     bfd *output_bfd;
+     char **error_message;
+{
+  return do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section,
+			 output_bfd, error_message,
+			 _bfd_ns32k_get_displacement,
+			 _bfd_ns32k_put_displacement);
+}
+
+bfd_reloc_status_type
+_bfd_ns32k_reloc_imm (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section,
+		      output_bfd, error_message)
+     bfd *abfd;
+     arelent *reloc_entry;
+     struct symbol_cache_entry *symbol;
+     PTR data;
+     asection *input_section;
+     bfd *output_bfd;
+     char **error_message;
+{
+  return do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section,
+			 output_bfd, error_message, _bfd_ns32k_get_immediate,
+			 _bfd_ns32k_put_immediate);
+}
+
+bfd_reloc_status_type
+_bfd_ns32k_final_link_relocate (howto, input_bfd, input_section, contents,
+				address, value, addend)
+     reloc_howto_type *howto;
+     bfd *input_bfd;
+     asection *input_section;
+     bfd_byte *contents;
+     bfd_vma address;
+     bfd_vma value;
+     bfd_vma addend;
+{
+  bfd_vma relocation;
+
+  /* Sanity check the address.  */
+  if (address > input_section->_cooked_size)
+    return bfd_reloc_outofrange;
+
+  /* This function assumes that we are dealing with a basic relocation
+     against a symbol.  We want to compute the value of the symbol to
+     relocate to.  This is just VALUE, the value of the symbol, plus
+     ADDEND, any addend associated with the reloc.  */
+  relocation = value + addend;
+
+  /* If the relocation is PC relative, we want to set RELOCATION to
+     the distance between the symbol (currently in RELOCATION) and the
+     location we are relocating.  Some targets (e.g., i386-aout)
+     arrange for the contents of the section to be the negative of the
+     offset of the location within the section; for such targets
+     pcrel_offset is false.  Other targets (e.g., m88kbcs or ELF)
+     simply leave the contents of the section as zero; for such
+     targets pcrel_offset is true.  If pcrel_offset is false we do not
+     need to subtract out the offset of the location within the
+     section (which is just ADDRESS).  */
+  if (howto->pc_relative)
+    {
+      relocation -= (input_section->output_section->vma
+		     + input_section->output_offset);
+      if (howto->pcrel_offset)
+	relocation -= address;
+    }
+
+  return _bfd_ns32k_relocate_contents (howto, input_bfd, relocation,
+				       contents + address);
+}