summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/more/writingdoc/structure.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'more/writingdoc/structure.html')
-rw-r--r--more/writingdoc/structure.html86
1 files changed, 57 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/more/writingdoc/structure.html b/more/writingdoc/structure.html
index 900f2a61a8..c38b554c7a 100644
--- a/more/writingdoc/structure.html
+++ b/more/writingdoc/structure.html
@@ -90,40 +90,44 @@
</dl>
</dd>
+ <dt><a href="#web">Web Reference Documentation</a></dt>
+
<dt><a href="#footnotes">Footnotes</a></dt>
</dl>
<h2><a name="introduction" id="introduction">Introduction</a></h2>
- <p>Boost itself does not require any specific documentation structure. The
- C++ Standard, however, has very explicit requirements for the description
- of library components (Section 17.3). So for Boost libraries likely to be
- proposed for inclusion in the standard, it is highly desirable to structure
- documentation in a way that meets the requirements of the the standard.
- Doing so eliminates the need to rewrite the documentation for
- standardization.</p>
-
- <p>Library developers should remember that for a library to be accepted as
- part of the C++ Standard Library, the proposal must include full wording.
- The committee will not do that work for you.</p>
-
- <p>Beyond that, the documentation structure required for the standard is an
- effective way to communicate the technical specifications for a library.
- Although terse, it is already familiar to many Boost users, and is far more
- precise than most ad hoc documentation structures.</p>
-
- <p>The following description is for the structure of documentation required
- by the standard. Boost libraries should also provided additional
- documentation, such as introductory, tutorial, example, and rationale
- material.</p>
+ <p>Boost does not require any specific documentation structure.
+ However, there are some important considerations that
+ influence content and structure. For example, many Boost
+ libraries wind up being proposed for inclusion in the C++
+ Standard, so writing them initially with text suitable for
+ inclusion in the Standard may be helpful. Also, Boost library
+ documentation is often accessed via the World Wide Web,
+ including via search engines, so context is often important
+ for every page. Finally, Boost libraries should provide
+ additional documentation, such as introductory, tutorial,
+ example, and rationale content. With those things in mind, we
+ suggest the following guidelines for Boost library
+ documentation.</p>
<h2><a name="standards-conforming" id="standards-conforming">Standards
Conforming</a> Documentation</h2>
+ <p>The documentation structure required for the C++ Standard is
+ an effective way to describe the technical specifications for
+ a library. Although terse, that format is familiar to many
+ Boost users and is far more precise than most ad hoc formats.
+ The following description is based upon &sect;17.3 of the
+ Standard. (Note that while final Standard proposals must
+ include full standardese wording, which the committee will
+ not do for you, that level of detail is not expected of Boost
+ library documentation.)</p>
+
<h3><a name="elements" id="elements">Document elements</a></h3>
<p>Each document contains the following elements, as applicable<a class=
- "footnote" href="#footnote1">(1)</a>:</p>
+ "footnote" href="#footnote1" id="footnote1-location">(1)</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#summary">Summary</a></li>
@@ -197,7 +201,7 @@
<p>In some cases the semantic requirements are presented as C++ code. Such
code is intended as a specification of equivalance of a construct to
another construct, not necessarily as the way the construct must be
- implemented.<a class="footnote" href="#footnote2">(2)</a></p>
+ implemented.<a class="footnote" href="#footnote2" id="footnote2-location">(2)</a></p>
<h4><a name="detailed-specs" id="detailed-specs">Detailed
specification</a></h4>
@@ -218,7 +222,7 @@
</ul>
<p>Descriptions of class member functions follow the order (as
- appropriate)<a class="footnote" href="#footnote3">(3)</a>:</p>
+ appropriate)<a class="footnote" href="#footnote3" id="footnote3-location">(3)</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Constructor(s) and destructor</li>
@@ -236,7 +240,7 @@
<p>Descriptions of function semantics contain the following <a name=
"function-elements" id="function-elements">elements</a> (as
- appropriate)<a class="footnote" href="#footnote4">(4):</a></p>
+ appropriate)<a class="footnote" href="#footnote4" id="footnote4-location">(4):</a></p>
<dl class="function-semantics">
<dt><b><a href="#requires">Requires:</a></b> the preconditions for
@@ -390,24 +394,48 @@ void resize(size_type n, charT c);
give users a lot of insight into why a library is designed the way it is.
More importantly, it can help prevent "fixing" something that wasn't really
broken as the library matures.</p>
+
+ <h2 id="web">Web Reference Documentation</h2>
+
+ <p>Boost library documentation is often accessed via the World
+ Web. Using search engines, a page deep in the reference
+ content could be viewed without any further context.
+ Therefore, it is helpful to add extra context, such as the
+ following, to each page:</p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>Describe the enclosing namespace or use fully scoped
+ identifiers.
+ <li>Document required headers for each type or function.
+ <li>Link to relevant tutorial information.
+ <li>Link to related example code.
+ <li>Include the library name.
+ <li>Include navigation elements to the beginning of the
+ documentation.
+ </ul>
+
+ <p>It is also useful to consider the effectiveness of a
+ description in search engines. Terse or cryptic descriptions
+ are less likely to help the curious find a relevant function
+ or type.</p>
<h2><a name="footnotes" id="footnotes">Footnotes</a></h2>
<dl>
- <dt><a class="footnote" name="footnote1" id="footnote1">(1)</a> To save
+ <dt><a class="footnote" id="footnote1" href="#footnote1-location">(1)</a> To save
space, items that do not apply to a clause are omitted. For example, if a
clause does not specify any requirements, there will be no "Requirements"
subclause.</dt>
- <dt><a class="footnote" name="footnote2" id="footnote2">(2)</a> Although
+ <dt><a class="footnote" id="footnote2" href="#footnote2-location">(2)</a> Although
in some cases the code is unambiguously the optimum implementation.</dt>
- <dt><a class="footnote" name="footnote3" id="footnote3">(3)</a> To save
+ <dt><a class="footnote" id="footnote3" href="#footnote3-location">(3)</a> To save
space, items that do not apply to a class are omitted. For example, if a
class does not specify any comparison functions, there will be no
"Comparison functions" subclause.</dt>
- <dt><a class="footnote" name="footnote4" id="footnote4">(4)</a> To save
+ <dt><a class="footnote" id="footnote4" href="#footnote4-location">(4)</a> To save
space, items that do not apply to a function are omitted. For example, if
a function does not specify any precondition, there will be no "Requires"
paragraph.</dt>