summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/development.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcel Hellkamp <marc@gsites.de>2011-03-19 16:32:46 +0100
committerMarcel Hellkamp <marc@gsites.de>2011-03-19 16:32:46 +0100
commit351910dad7e54d702bd7882046a069872c61c173 (patch)
tree7c0de3d197780c9eac25e0e4e522e37dcfed31e5 /docs/development.rst
parent474e7d3a009350a8c8e3cebfc77129ecf9f5cc4e (diff)
downloadbottle-351910dad7e54d702bd7882046a069872c61c173.tar.gz
docs: Moved files from "apidoc" to "docs" to make readthedocs.org happy.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/development.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/development.rst142
1 files changed, 142 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/development.rst b/docs/development.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ed4e8b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/development.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+Developer Notes
+=================
+
+This document is intended for developers and package maintainers interested in the bottle development and release workflow. If you want to contribute, you are just right!
+
+Get involved
+------------
+
+There are several ways to join the community and stay up to date. Here are some of them:
+
+* **Mailinglist**: Join the mailinglist by sending an email to `bottlepy@googlegroups.com <mailto:bottlepy@googlegroups.com>`_ or using the web front-end at `google groups <http://groups.google.de/group/bottlepy>`_. You don't need a Google account to use the mailing-list, but then I have to approve your subscription manually to protect the list from spam. Please be patient in that case.
+* **Twitter**: Follow us on `Twitter<twitter.com/bottlepy>`_ or search for the ``#bottlepy`` tag.
+* **IRC**: Join `#bottlepy <irc://irc.freenode.net/bottlepy>`_ on irc.freenode.net.
+
+Get the Sources
+---------------
+
+The bottle development repository and the issue tracker are both hosted at `github <http://github.com/defnull/bottle>`_. If you plan to contribute, it is a good idea to create an account there and fork the main repository. This way your changes and ideas are visible to other developers and can be discussed openly. Even without an account, you can clone the repository using `git <http://git-scm.com/>`_ (recommended) or just download the latest development version as a source archive.
+
+* **git:** ``git clone git://github.com/defnull/bottle.git``
+* **git/http:** ``git clone http://github.com/defnull/bottle.git``
+* **svn:** ``svn checkout http://svn.github.com/defnull/bottle.git`` (not recommended)
+* **Download:** Development branch as `tar archive <http://github.com/defnull/bottle/tarball/master>`_ or `zip file <http://github.com/defnull/bottle/zipball/master>`_.
+
+Branches and their Intention
+----------------------------
+
+The bottle project follows a development and release workflow similar to the one described by `Vincent Driessen in his blog <http://nvie.com/git-model>`_ (very interesting read) with some exceptions:
+
+1) There is no ``develop`` branch. The ``master`` branch is used for development and integration.
+2) Release-branches don't die. They stay alive as long as the release is still supported and host the most recent bug-fixed revision of that release.
+3) Hotfix-branches don't have to start with ``hotfix-`` but should end in a release number. Example: "some_bug-0.8"
+
+For a quick overview I'll describe the different branch-types and their intentions here:
+
+master
+ This is the integration, testing and development branch. All changes that are planned to be part of the next release are merged and tested here.
+
+release-x.y
+ As soon as the master branch is (almost) ready for a new release, it is branched into a new release branch. This "release candidate" is feature-frozen but may receive bug-fixes and last-minute changes until it is considered production ready and officially released. From that point on it is called a "support branch" and still receives bug-fixes, but only important ones. The revision number is increased on each push to these branches, so you can keep up with important changes.
+
+bugfix_name-x.y
+ These branches are only temporary and used to develop and share non-trivial bug-fixes for existing releases. They are merged into the corresponding release branch and delete soon after that.
+
+Feature branches
+ All other branches are feature branches. These are based on the master branch and only live as long as they are still active and not merged back into ``master``.
+
+.. rubric:: What does this mean for a developer?
+
+If you want to add a feature, create a new branch from ``master``. If you want to fix a bug, branch ``release-x.y`` for each affected release. Please use a separate branch for each feature or bug to make integration as easy as possible. Thats all. There are git workflow examples at the bottom of this page.
+
+Oh, and never ever change the release number. I'll do that on integration. You never know in which order I am going to pull pending requests anyway :)
+
+.. rubric:: What does this mean for a maintainer ?
+
+Watch the tags (and the mailing list) for bug-fixes and new releases. If you want to fetch a specific release from the git repository, trust the tags, not the branches. A branch may contain changes that are not released yet, but a tag marks the exact commit which changed the version number.
+
+.. rubric:: Patch Submission
+
+The best way to get your changes integrated into the main development branch is to fork the main repository at github, create a new feature-branch, apply your changes and send a pull-request. Further down this page is a small collection of git workflow examples that may guide you. Submitting git-compatible patches to the mailing list is fine too. In any case, please follow some basic rules:
+
+ * **Documentation:** Tell us what your patch does. Comment your code. If you introduced a new feature, add to the documentation so others can learn about it.
+ * **Test:** Write tests to prove that your code works as expected and does not break anything. If you fixed a bug, write at least one test-case that triggers the bug. Make sure that all tests pass before you submit a patch.
+ * **One patch at a time:** Only fix one bug or add one feature at a time. Design your patches so that they can be applyed as a whole. Keep your patches clean, small and focused.
+ * **Sync with upstream:** If the ``upstream/master`` branch changed while you were working on your patch, rebase or pull to make sure that your patch still applies without conflicts.
+
+
+Releases and Updates
+--------------------
+
+Bottle is released at irregular intervals and distributed through `PyPi <http://pypi.python.org/pypi/bottle>`_. Release candidates and bugfix-revisions of outdated releases are only available from the git repository mentioned above. Some Linux distributions may offer packages for outdated releases, though.
+
+The Bottle version number splits into three parts (**major.minor.revision**). These are *not* used to promote new features but to indicate important bug-fixes and/or API changes. Critical bugs are fixed in at least the two latest minor releases and announced in all available channels (mailinglist, twitter, github). Non-critical bugs or features are not guaranteed to be backported. This may change in the future, through.
+
+Major Release
+ The major release number is increased on important milestones or updates that completely break backward compatibility. You probably have to work over your entire application to use a new release. These releases are very rare, through.
+
+Minor Release
+ The minor release number is increased on updates that change the API or behaviour in some way. You might get some depreciation warnings any may have to tweak some configuration settings to restore the old behaviour, but in most cases these changes are designed to be backward compatible for at least one minor release. You should update to stay up do date, but don't have to. An exception is 0.8, which *will* break backward compatibility hard. (This is why 0.7 was skipped). Sorry for that.
+
+Revision
+ The revision number is increased on bug-fixes and other patches that do not change the API or behaviour. You can safely update without editing your application code. In fact, you really should as soon as possible, because important security fixes are released this way.
+
+Pre-Release Versions
+ Release candidates are marked by an ``rc`` in their revision number. These are API stable most of the time and open for testing, but not officially released yet. You should not use these for production.
+
+
+
+GIT Workflow Examples
+---------------------
+
+The following examples assume that you have an (free) account at `github <http://github.com>`_. This is not mandatory, but makes things a lot easier.
+
+First of all you have to create a fork (a personal clone) of the official repository. To do this, you simply click the "fork" button on the `bottle project page <http://github.com/defnull/bottle>`_. When the fork is done, you will be presented with a short introduction to your new repository.
+
+The fork you just created is hosted at github and read-able by everyone, but write-able only by you. Now you need to clone the fork locally to actually make changes to it. Make sure you use the private (read-write) URL and *not* the public (read-only) one::
+
+ git clone git@github.com:your_github_account/bottle.git
+
+Once the clone is complete your repository will have a remote named "origin" that points to your fork on github. Don’t let the name confuse you, this does not point to the original bottle repository, but to your own fork. To keep track of the official repository, add another remote named "upstream"::
+
+ cd bottle
+ git remote add upstream git://github.com/defnull/bottle.git
+ git fetch upstream
+
+Note that "upstream" is a public clone URL, which is read-only. You cannot push changes directly to it. Instead, we will pull from your public repository. This is described later.
+
+.. rubric:: Submit a Feature
+
+New features are developed in separate feature-branches to make integration easy. Because they are going to be integrated into the ``master`` branch, they must be based on ``upstream/master``. To create a new feature-branch, type the following::
+
+ git checkout -b cool_feature upstream/master
+
+Now implement your feature, write tests, update the documentation, make sure that all tests pass and commit your changes::
+
+ git commit -a -m "Cool Feature"
+
+If the ``upstream/master`` branch changed in the meantime, there may be conflicts with your changes. To solve these, 'rebase' your feature-branch onto the top of the updated ``upstream/master`` branch::
+
+ git fetch upstream
+ git rebase upstream
+
+This is equivalent to undoing all your changes, updating your branch to the latest version and reapplying all your patches again. If you released your branch already (see next step), this is not an option because it rewrites your history. You can do a normal pull instead. Resolve any conflicts, run the tests again and commit.
+
+Now you are almost ready to send a pull request. But first you need to make your feature-branch public by pushing it to your github fork::
+
+ git push origin cool_feature
+
+After you’ve pushed your commit(s) you need to inform us about the new feature. One way is to send a pull-request using github. Another way would be to start a thread in the mailing-list, which is recommended. It allows other developers to see and discuss your patches and you get some feedback for free :)
+
+If we accept your patch, we will integrate it into the official development branch and make it part of the next release.
+
+.. rubric:: Fix a Bug
+
+The workflow for bug-fixes is very similar to the one for features, but there are some differences:
+
+1) Branch off of the affected release branches instead of just the development branch.
+2) Write at least one test-case that triggers the bug.
+3) Do this for each affected branch including ``upstream/master`` if it is affected. ``git cherry-pick`` may help you reducing repetitive work.
+4) Name your branch after the release it is based on to avoid confusion. Examples: ``my_bugfix-x.y`` or ``my_bugfix-dev``.
+
+