diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'README')
-rw-r--r-- | README | 221 |
1 files changed, 221 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +These are the GNU core utilities. This package is the union of +the GNU fileutils, sh-utils, and textutils packages. + +Most of these programs have significant advantages over their Unix +counterparts, such as greater speed, additional options, and fewer +arbitrary limits. + +The programs that can be built with this package are: + + [ base64 basename cat chgrp chmod chown chroot cksum comm cp csplit cut date + dd df dir dircolors dirname du echo env expand expr factor false fmt fold + ginstall groups head hostid hostname id join kill link ln logname ls + md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod mv nice nl nohup od paste pathchk pinky pr + printenv printf ptx pwd readlink rm rmdir seq sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum + sha384sum sha512sum shred shuf sleep sort split stat stty su sum sync tac + tail tee test touch tr true tsort tty uname unexpand uniq unlink uptime + users vdir wc who whoami yes + +See the file NEWS for a list of major changes in the current release. + +See the file INSTALL for compilation and installation instructions. + +These programs are intended to conform to POSIX (with BSD and other +extensions), like the rest of the GNU system. By default they conform +to older POSIX (1003.2-1992), and therefore support obsolete usages +like "head -10" and "chown owner.group file". This default is +overridden at build-time by the value of <unistd.h>'s _POSIX2_VERSION +macro, and this in turn can be overridden at runtime as described in +the documentation under "Standards conformance". + +The ls, dir, and vdir commands are all separate executables instead of +one program that checks argv[0] because people often rename these +programs to things like gls, gnuls, l, etc. Renaming a program +file shouldn't affect how it operates, so that people can get the +behavior they want with whatever name they want. + +Special thanks to Paul Eggert, Brian Matthews, Bruce Evans, Karl Berry, +Kaveh Ghazi, and François Pinard for help with debugging and porting +these programs. Many thanks to all of the people who have taken the +time to submit problem reports and fixes. All contributed changes are +attributed in the ChangeLog files. + +And thanks to the following people who have provided accounts for +portability testing on many different types of systems: Bob Proulx, +Christian Robert, François Pinard, Greg McGary, Harlan Stenn, +Joel N. Weber, Mark D. Roth, Matt Schalit, Nelson H. F. Beebe, +Réjean Payette, Sam Tardieu. + +Thanks to Michael Stone for inflicting test releases of this package +on Debian's unstable distribution, and to all the kind folks who used +that distribution and found and reported bugs. + +Note that each man page is now automatically generated from a template +and from the corresponding --help usage message. Patches to the template +files (man/*.x) are welcome. However, the authoritative documentation +is in texinfo form in the doc directory. + +If you run the tests on a SunOS4.1.4 system, expect the ctime-part of +the ls `time-1' test to fail. I believe that is due to a bug in the +way Sun implemented link(2) and chmod(2). + + +*********************** +Pre-C99 build failure +----------------------- + +There is a new, implicit build requirement: +To build the coreutils from source, you should have a C99-conforming +compiler, due to the use of declarations after non-declaration statements +in several files in src/. There is code in configure to find and, if +possible, enable an appropriate compiler. However, if configure doesn't +find a C99 compiler, it continues nonetheless, and your build will fail. +If that happens, simply apply the included patch using the following +command, and then run make again: + + cd src && patch < c99-to-c89.diff + + +*********************** +HPUX 11.x build failure +----------------------- + +A known problem exists when compiling on HPUX on both hppa and ia64 +in 64-bit mode (i.e. +DD64) on HP-UX 11.0, 11.11, and 11.23. This +is not due to a bug in the package but instead due to a bug in the +system header file which breaks things in 64-bit mode. The default +compilation mode is 32-bit and the software compiles fine using the +default mode. To build this software in 64-bit mode you will need +to fix the system /usr/include/inttypes.h header file. After +correcting that file the software also compiles fine in 64-bit mode. +Here is one possible patch to correct the problem: + +--- /usr/include/inttypes.h.orig Thu May 30 01:00:00 1996 ++++ /usr/include/inttypes.h Sun Mar 23 00:20:36 2003 +@@ -489 +489 @@ +-#ifndef __STDC_32_MODE__ ++#ifndef __LP64__ + + +************************ +OSF/1 4.0d build failure +------------------------ + +If you use /usr/bin/make on an OSF/1 4.0d system, it will fail due +to the presence of the "[" target. That version of make appears to +treat "[" as some syntax relating to locks. To work around that, +the best solution is to use GNU make. Otherwise, simply remove +all mention of "[$(EXEEXT)" from src/Makefile. + + + +********************** +Running tests as root: +---------------------- + +If you run the tests as root, note that a few of them create files +and/or run programs as a non-root user, `nobody' by default. +If you want to use some other non-root username, specify it via +the NON_ROOT_USERNAME environment variable. Depending on the +permissions with which the working directories have been created, +using `nobody' may fail, because that user won't have the required +read and write access to the build and test directories. +I find that it is best to unpack and build as a non-privileged +user, and then to run the following command as that user in order +to run the privilege-requiring tests: + + sudo env NON_ROOT_USERNAME=$USER make -k check + +If you can run the tests as root, please do so and report any +problems. We get much less test coverage in that mode, and it's +arguably more important that these tools work well when run by +root than when run by less privileged users. + + +*************** +Reporting bugs: +--------------- + +IMPORTANT: if you take the time to report a test failure, +please be sure to include the output of running `make check' +in verbose mode for each failing test. For example, +if the test that fails is tests/mv/hard-link-1, then you +would run this command: + + env VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests/mv TESTS=hard-link-1 >> log 2>&1 + +For some tests, you can get even more detail by including +DEBUG=yes in the environment: + + env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests/mv TESTS=hard-link-1 >> log 2>&1 + +and then include the contents of the file `log' in your bug report. + +*************************************** + +There are many tests, but nowhere near as many as we need. +Additions and corrections are very welcome. + +If you see a problem that you've already reported, feel free to re-report +it -- it won't bother me to get a reminder. Besides, the more messages I +get regarding a particular problem the sooner it'll be fixed -- usually. +If you sent a complete patch and, after a couple weeks you haven't +received any acknowledgement, please ping us. A complete patch includes +a well-written ChangeLog entry, unified (diff -u format) diffs relative +to the most recent test release (or, better, relative to the latest +sources in the CVS repository), an explanation for why the patch is +necessary or useful, and if at all possible, enough information to +reproduce whatever problem prompted it. Plus, you'll earn lots of +karma if you include a test case to exercise any bug(s) you fix. +Instructions for checking out the latest source via CVS are here: + + http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=coreutils + + +If your patch adds a new feature, please try to get some sort of consensus +that it is a worthwhile change. One way to do that is to send mail to +bug-coreutils@gnu.org including as much description and justification +as you can. Based on the feedback that generates, you may be able to +convince us that it's worth adding. + + +WARNING: Now that we use the ./bootstrap script, you should not run +autoreconf manually. Doing that will overwrite essential source files +with older versions, which may make the package unbuildable or introduce +subtle bugs. + + +WARNING: If you modify files like configure.in, m4/*.m4, aclocal.m4, +or any Makefile.am, then don't be surprised if what gets regenerated no +longer works. To make things work, you'll have to be using appropriate +versions of automake and autoconf. As for what versions are `appropriate', +use the versions of + + * autoconf specified via AC_PREREQ in m4/jm-macros.m4 + * automake specified via AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE in configure.ac + +Usually it's fine to use versions that are newer than those specified. + +All of these programs except `test' recognize the `--version' option. +When reporting bugs, please include in the subject line both the package +name/version and the name of the program for which you found a problem. + +For general documentation on the coding and usage standards +this distribution follows, see the GNU Coding Standards, +http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html. + +Mail suggestions and bug reports for these programs to +the address on the last line of --help output. + + +======================================================================== + +Copyright (C) 1998, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software +Foundation, Inc. + +Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document +under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no +Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover +Texts. A copy of the license is included in the ``GNU Free +Documentation License'' file as part of this distribution. |