1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
|
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More;
use Test::Fatal;
{
# test no conflicts here
package Role::A;
use Moose::Role;
sub bar { 'Role::A::bar' }
package Role::B;
use Moose::Role;
sub xxy { 'Role::B::xxy' }
package Role::C;
use Moose::Role;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::A Role::B); # no conflict here
}, undef, "define role C" );
sub foo { 'Role::C::foo' }
sub zot { 'Role::C::zot' }
package Class::A;
use Moose;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::C);
}, undef, "define class A" );
sub zot { 'Class::A::zot' }
}
can_ok( Class::A->new, qw(foo bar xxy zot) );
is( Class::A->new->foo, "Role::C::foo", "... got the right foo method" );
is( Class::A->new->zot, "Class::A::zot", "... got the right zot method" );
is( Class::A->new->bar, "Role::A::bar", "... got the right bar method" );
is( Class::A->new->xxy, "Role::B::xxy", "... got the right xxy method" );
{
# check that when a role is added to another role
# that the consumer's method shadows just like for classes.
package Role::A::Shadow;
use Moose::Role;
with 'Role::A';
sub bar { 'Role::A::Shadow::bar' }
package Class::A::Shadow;
use Moose;
::is( ::exception {
with 'Role::A::Shadow';
}, undef, '... did fufill the requirement of &bar method' );
}
can_ok( Class::A::Shadow->new, qw(bar) );
is( Class::A::Shadow->new->bar, 'Role::A::Shadow::bar', "... got the right bar method" );
{
# check that when two roles are composed, they conflict
# but the composing role can resolve that conflict
package Role::D;
use Moose::Role;
sub foo { 'Role::D::foo' }
sub bar { 'Role::D::bar' }
package Role::E;
use Moose::Role;
sub foo { 'Role::E::foo' }
sub xxy { 'Role::E::xxy' }
package Role::F;
use Moose::Role;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::D Role::E); # conflict between 'foo's here
}, undef, "define role Role::F" );
sub foo { 'Role::F::foo' }
sub zot { 'Role::F::zot' }
package Class::B;
use Moose;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::F);
}, undef, "define class Class::B" );
sub zot { 'Class::B::zot' }
}
can_ok( Class::B->new, qw(foo bar xxy zot) );
is( Class::B->new->foo, "Role::F::foo", "... got the &foo method okay" );
is( Class::B->new->zot, "Class::B::zot", "... got the &zot method okay" );
is( Class::B->new->bar, "Role::D::bar", "... got the &bar method okay" );
is( Class::B->new->xxy, "Role::E::xxy", "... got the &xxy method okay" );
ok(!Role::F->meta->requires_method('foo'), '... Role::F fufilled the &foo requirement');
{
# check that a conflict can be resolved
# by a role, but also new ones can be
# created just as easily ...
package Role::D::And::E::NoConflict;
use Moose::Role;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::D Role::E); # conflict between 'foo's here
}, undef, "... define role Role::D::And::E::NoConflict" );
sub foo { 'Role::D::And::E::NoConflict::foo' } # this overrides ...
sub xxy { 'Role::D::And::E::NoConflict::xxy' } # and so do these ...
sub bar { 'Role::D::And::E::NoConflict::bar' }
}
ok(!Role::D::And::E::NoConflict->meta->requires_method('foo'), '... Role::D::And::E::NoConflict fufilled the &foo requirement');
ok(!Role::D::And::E::NoConflict->meta->requires_method('xxy'), '... Role::D::And::E::NoConflict fulfilled the &xxy requirement');
ok(!Role::D::And::E::NoConflict->meta->requires_method('bar'), '... Role::D::And::E::NoConflict fulfilled the &bar requirement');
{
# conflict propagation
package Role::H;
use Moose::Role;
sub foo { 'Role::H::foo' }
sub bar { 'Role::H::bar' }
package Role::J;
use Moose::Role;
sub foo { 'Role::J::foo' }
sub xxy { 'Role::J::xxy' }
package Role::I;
use Moose::Role;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::J Role::H); # conflict between 'foo's here
}, undef, "define role Role::I" );
sub zot { 'Role::I::zot' }
sub zzy { 'Role::I::zzy' }
package Class::C;
use Moose;
::like( ::exception {
with qw(Role::I);
}, qr/Due to a method name conflict in roles 'Role::H' and 'Role::J', the method 'foo' must be implemented or excluded by 'Class::C'/, "defining class Class::C fails" );
sub zot { 'Class::C::zot' }
package Class::E;
use Moose;
::is( ::exception {
with qw(Role::I);
}, undef, "resolved with method" );
sub foo { 'Class::E::foo' }
sub zot { 'Class::E::zot' }
}
can_ok( Class::E->new, qw(foo bar xxy zot) );
is( Class::E->new->foo, "Class::E::foo", "... got the right &foo method" );
is( Class::E->new->zot, "Class::E::zot", "... got the right &zot method" );
is( Class::E->new->bar, "Role::H::bar", "... got the right &bar method" );
is( Class::E->new->xxy, "Role::J::xxy", "... got the right &xxy method" );
ok(Role::I->meta->requires_method('foo'), '... Role::I still have the &foo requirement');
{
is( exception {
package Class::D;
use Moose;
has foo => ( default => __PACKAGE__ . "::foo", is => "rw" );
sub zot { 'Class::D::zot' }
with qw(Role::I);
}, undef, "resolved with attr" );
can_ok( Class::D->new, qw(foo bar xxy zot) );
is( eval { Class::D->new->bar }, "Role::H::bar", "bar" );
is( eval { Class::D->new->zzy }, "Role::I::zzy", "zzy" );
is( eval { Class::D->new->foo }, "Class::D::foo", "foo" );
is( eval { Class::D->new->zot }, "Class::D::zot", "zot" );
}
done_testing;
|
