diff options
| author | Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> | 2009-04-11 20:58:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org> | 2009-04-11 20:58:12 +0000 |
| commit | ed513ef79724535c9ad2488e664ae17dc4d80dec (patch) | |
| tree | 90f9fb8e2fb096c96b198c0c2d69f35d82db9eb5 /Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst | |
| parent | e0c50e648b6e777eb4fb34941c1f90179fdf7eb7 (diff) | |
| download | cpython-ed513ef79724535c9ad2488e664ae17dc4d80dec.tar.gz | |
Merged revisions 71498 via svnmerge from
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk
........
r71498 | benjamin.peterson | 2009-04-11 15:27:15 -0500 (Sat, 11 Apr 2009) | 1 line
fix markup
........
Diffstat (limited to 'Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst b/Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst index 55d9a2b93e..3b98cc2921 100644 --- a/Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst +++ b/Doc/whatsnew/2.7.rst @@ -88,22 +88,21 @@ Other Language Changes Some smaller changes made to the core Python language are: -* The string :method:`format` method now supports automatic numbering - of the replacement fields. This makes using :meth:`format` - more closely resemble using ``%s`` formatting:: +* :meth:`str.format` method now supports automatic numbering of the replacement + fields. This makes using :meth:`str.format` more closely resemble using + ``%s`` formatting:: >>> '{}:{}:{}'.format(2009, 04, 'Sunday') '2009:4:Sunday' >>> '{}:{}:{day}'.format(2009, 4, day='Sunday') '2009:4:Sunday' - The auto-numbering takes the fields from left to right, so the first - ``{...}`` specifier will use the first argument to :meth:`format`, - the next specifier will use the next argument, and so on. You can't - mix auto-numbering and explicit numbering -- either number all of - your specifier fields or none of them -- but you can mix - auto-numbering and named fields, as in the second example above. - (Contributed by XXX; :issue`5237`.) + The auto-numbering takes the fields from left to right, so the first ``{...}`` + specifier will use the first argument to :meth:`str.format`, the next + specifier will use the next argument, and so on. You can't mix auto-numbering + and explicit numbering -- either number all of your specifier fields or none + of them -- but you can mix auto-numbering and named fields, as in the second + example above. (Contributed by XXX; :issue`5237`.) * The :func:`int` and :func:`long` types gained a ``bit_length`` method that returns the number of bits necessary to represent |