Moby report 2017-05-15

Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>

1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/reports/2017-05-15.md b/reports/2017-05-15.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..372630c2c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/reports/2017-05-15.md
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Development Report for May 15, 2017
+
+## Daily Meeting
+
+A daily meeting is hosted on [slack](https://dockercommunity.slack.com) every business day at 9am PST on the channel `#moby-project`.
+During this meeting, we are talking about the [tasks](https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/32867) needed to be done for splitting moby and docker.
+
+## Topics discussed last week
+
+### The CLI split
+
+Work is in progress to move the "opts" package to the docker/cli repository. The package, was merged into the docker/cli
+repository through [docker/cli#82](https://github.com/docker/cli/pull/82), preserving Git history, and parts that are not
+used in Moby have been removed through [moby/moby#33198](https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/33198).
+
+### Find a good and non-confusing home for the remaining monolith
+
+Discussion on this topic is still ongoing, and possible approaches are looked into. The active discussion has moved
+from GitHub to [https://forums.mobyproject.org/](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/topic-find-a-good-an-non-confusing-home-for-the-remaining-monolith/37)
+
+### Find a place for `/pkg`
+
+Concerns were raised about moving packages to separate repositories, and it was decided to put some extra effort into
+breaking up / removing existing packages that likely are not good candidates to become a standalone project.
+
+### Update integration-cli tests
+
+With the removal of the CLI from the moby repository, new pull requests will have to be tested using API tests instead
+of using the CLI. Discussion took place whether or not these tests should use the API `client` package, or be completely
+independend, and make raw HTTP calls.
+
+A topic was created on the forum to discuss options: [evolution of testing](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/evolution-of-testing-moby/38)
+
+
+### Proposal: split & containerize hack/validate 
+
+[@AkihiroSuda](https://github.com/AkihiroSuda) is proposing to split and containerize the `hack/validate` script and 
+[started a topic on the forum](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/proposal-split-containerize-hack-validate/32). An initial
+proposal to add validation functionality to `vndr` (the vendoring tool in use) was rejected upstream, so alternative
+approaches were discussed.
+
+
+### Special Interest Groups
+
+A "SIG" category was created on the forums to provide a home for Special Interest Groups. The first SIG, [LinuxKit 
+Security](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/about-the-linuxkit-security-category/44) was started (thanks 
+[@riyazdf](https://github.com/riyazdf)).
+
+
+### Builder
+
+The builder dev report can be found [here](builder/2017-05-15.md)