| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All the driver conversion work and cleanup has been done by Stefan.
flashrom.c and cli_classic.c are a joint work of Stefan and Carl-Daniel.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1579 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All SPI chips without a WRSR feature bit set were evaluated except the
Sanyo LF25FW203A for which no datasheet is available.
The following list includes all SPI-capable chips that still have no
WRSR feature bit set:
- AT26DF041
- AT45CS1282
- AT45DB011D
- AT45DB021D
- AT45DB041D
- AT45DB081D
- AT45DB161D
- AT45DB321C
- AT45DB321D
- AT45DB642D
All of them have no write function set and can be therefore ignored
for now.
Apart from those the generic chips are also not tagged. The opaque
flash interface should not be affected. The SFDP dummy chip is
changed to explicitly set EWSR if it can't deduce it dynamically.
The vendor detecting generic chips can't write anyway.
Signed-off-by: Steven Zakulec <spzakulec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1527 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SFDP parameter table reads expect a dummy byte between written data
(opcode+address) and read data on the SPI bus. Read that dummy byte
instead of writing it to be compatible with all programmer drivers.
Reduce SFDP parameter table read chunk size from 8 to 2 to handle
programmers with small readcount limits.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1506 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sfdp_add_uniform_eraser checks for existing erasers. Due to a bug it
looked for eraser slots that have no erase functions set instead of
those that have one set.
Postpone adding an erase function for the special 4k block erase
opcode until we know the flash chip size and add an additional check
to sfdp_add_uniform_eraser.
Fix the output of the parameter table contents.
This patch fixes the index used to retrieve the eraser types, which
was off one double word.
Refine some messages and add a few further debugging prints.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1505 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
|
Similar to modules using the opaque programmer framework (e.g. ICH Hardware
Sequencing) this uses a template struct flashchip element in flashchips.c with
a special probe function that fills the obtained values into that struct.
This allows yet unknown SPI chips to be supported (read, erase, write) almost
as if it was already added to flashchips.c.
Documentation used:
http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/jesd216 (2011-04)
W25Q32BV data sheet Revision F (2011-04-01)
EN25QH16 data sheet Revision F (2011-06-01)
MX25L6436E data sheet Revision 1.8 (2011-12-26)
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@google.com>
on W25Q64CV + dediprog
Tested-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
on a 2010 MX25L6436E with preliminary (i.e. incorrect) SFDP implementation + serprog
Thanks also to Michael Karcher for his comments and preliminary review!
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1500 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|