summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/FreeRTOS/Test/CBMC/proofs/Task/TaskDelete/README.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'FreeRTOS/Test/CBMC/proofs/Task/TaskDelete/README.md')
-rw-r--r--FreeRTOS/Test/CBMC/proofs/Task/TaskDelete/README.md19
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/FreeRTOS/Test/CBMC/proofs/Task/TaskDelete/README.md b/FreeRTOS/Test/CBMC/proofs/Task/TaskDelete/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9b9753043
--- /dev/null
+++ b/FreeRTOS/Test/CBMC/proofs/Task/TaskDelete/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+This proof demonstrates the memory safety of the TaskDelete function. The
+initialization for the task to be delete and `pxCurrentTCB` is quite similar
+(since the task handle may be NULL, and in that case `pxCurrentTCB` is used).
+The task to be deleted requires the stack in the task control block to be
+allocated, and the flag for static allocation to be properly set (i.e., valid
+values as defined by the macros) Task lists are initialized with these tasks
+and nondet. filled with a few more items. We assume a nondet. value for
+`xSchedulerRunning`.
+
+This proof is a work-in-progress. Proof assumptions are described in
+the harness. The proof also assumes the following functions are
+memory safe and have no side effects relevant to the memory safety of
+this function:
+
+* vPortCloseRunningThread
+* vPortDeleteThread
+* vPortEnterCritical
+* vPortExitCritical
+* vPortGenerateSimulatedInterrupt