diff options
| author | Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> | 2002-05-10 07:32:50 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> | 2002-05-10 07:32:50 +0000 |
| commit | 38a7e22917e9b75f530d68e45f3f4e1def649232 (patch) | |
| tree | 2ec97f2e0ee9ad855cccd1540044209235180d7f | |
| parent | 00a5158f6d664deae53cd1e14bb9b41a86c8e30d (diff) | |
| download | gdb-38a7e22917e9b75f530d68e45f3f4e1def649232.tar.gz | |
* dbxread.c (discarding_local_symbols_complaint): New complaint.
(process_one_symbol): Complain about discarding local symbols
due to a misplaced N_LBRAC entry.
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/ChangeLog | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/dbxread.c | 19 |
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 57c8afc088b..a238023e4a6 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2002-05-10 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> + + * dbxread.c (discarding_local_symbols_complaint): New complaint. + (process_one_symbol): Complain about discarding local symbols + due to a misplaced N_LBRAC entry. + 2002-05-09 Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> From Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> diff --git a/gdb/dbxread.c b/gdb/dbxread.c index 9b2b73b042f..430e3f51f29 100644 --- a/gdb/dbxread.c +++ b/gdb/dbxread.c @@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ struct complaint repeated_header_complaint = struct complaint unclaimed_bincl_complaint = {"N_BINCL %s not in entries for any file, at symtab pos %d", 0, 0}; + +struct complaint discarding_local_symbols_complaint = +{"misplaced N_LBRAC entry; discarding local symbols which have no enclosing block", 0, 0}; /* find_text_range --- find start and end of loadable code sections @@ -2881,7 +2884,21 @@ process_one_symbol (int type, int desc, CORE_ADDR valu, char *name, /* Can only use new->locals as local symbols here if we're in gcc or on a machine that puts them before the lbrack. */ if (!VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation)) - local_symbols = new->locals; + { + if (local_symbols != NULL) + { + /* GCC development snapshots from March to December of + 2000 would output N_LSYM entries after N_LBRAC + entries. As a consequence, these symbols are simply + discarded. Complain if this is the case. Note that + there are some compilers which legitimately put local + symbols within an LBRAC/RBRAC block; this complaint + might also help sort out problems in which + VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK is incorrectly defined. */ + complain (&discarding_local_symbols_complaint); + } + local_symbols = new->locals; + } if (context_stack_depth > !VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation)) |