summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/arm-tdep.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUlrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>2010-10-08 13:24:53 +0000
committerUlrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>2010-10-08 13:24:53 +0000
commitdd27d5c2d16490fdaaec82a6b242ae29229d6e47 (patch)
treebd47e24c308304a511d557d5863f4b705d734633 /gdb/arm-tdep.c
parent2b95718c85fe50547c0ac1670c3f53d64020dd00 (diff)
downloadgdb-dd27d5c2d16490fdaaec82a6b242ae29229d6e47.tar.gz
2010-10-08 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> * arm-tdep.c (thumb_in_function_epilogue_p) (arm_in_function_epilogue_p): New. (arm_gdbarch_init): Install arm_in_function_epilogue_p as gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p callback.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/arm-tdep.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/arm-tdep.c200
1 files changed, 200 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
index 4a028c8385c..e2d02b47dae 100644
--- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
@@ -1706,6 +1706,203 @@ arm_dwarf2_frame_init_reg (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
}
}
+/* Return true if we are in the function's epilogue, i.e. after the
+ instruction that destroyed the function's stack frame. */
+
+static int
+thumb_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ enum bfd_endian byte_order_for_code = gdbarch_byte_order_for_code (gdbarch);
+ unsigned int insn, insn2;
+ int found_return = 0, found_stack_adjust = 0;
+ CORE_ADDR func_start, func_end;
+ CORE_ADDR scan_pc;
+ gdb_byte buf[4];
+
+ if (!find_pc_partial_function (pc, NULL, &func_start, &func_end))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* The epilogue is a sequence of instructions along the following lines:
+
+ - add stack frame size to SP or FP
+ - [if frame pointer used] restore SP from FP
+ - restore registers from SP [may include PC]
+ - a return-type instruction [if PC wasn't already restored]
+
+ In a first pass, we scan forward from the current PC and verify the
+ instructions we find as compatible with this sequence, ending in a
+ return instruction.
+
+ However, this is not sufficient to distinguish indirect function calls
+ within a function from indirect tail calls in the epilogue in some cases.
+ Therefore, if we didn't already find any SP-changing instruction during
+ forward scan, we add a backward scanning heuristic to ensure we actually
+ are in the epilogue. */
+
+ scan_pc = pc;
+ while (scan_pc < func_end && !found_return)
+ {
+ if (target_read_memory (scan_pc, buf, 2))
+ break;
+
+ scan_pc += 2;
+ insn = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 2, byte_order_for_code);
+
+ if ((insn & 0xff80) == 0x4700) /* bx <Rm> */
+ found_return = 1;
+ else if (insn == 0x46f7) /* mov pc, lr */
+ found_return = 1;
+ else if (insn == 0x46bd) /* mov sp, r7 */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0xff00) == 0xb000) /* add sp, imm or sub sp, imm */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0xfe00) == 0xbc00) /* pop <registers> */
+ {
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ if (insn & 0x0100) /* <registers> include PC. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ }
+ else if ((insn & 0xe000) == 0xe000) /* 32-bit Thumb-2 instruction */
+ {
+ if (target_read_memory (scan_pc, buf, 2))
+ break;
+
+ scan_pc += 2;
+ insn2 = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 2, byte_order_for_code);
+
+ if (insn == 0xe8bd) /* ldm.w sp!, <registers> */
+ {
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ if (insn2 & 0x8000) /* <registers> include PC. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ }
+ else if (insn == 0xf85d /* ldr.w <Rt>, [sp], #4 */
+ && (insn2 & 0x0fff) == 0x0b04)
+ {
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ if ((insn2 & 0xf000) == 0xf000) /* <Rt> is PC. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ }
+ else if ((insn & 0xffbf) == 0xecbd /* vldm sp!, <list> */
+ && (insn2 & 0x0e00) == 0x0a00)
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (!found_return)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Since any instruction in the epilogue sequence, with the possible
+ exception of return itself, updates the stack pointer, we need to
+ scan backwards for at most one instruction. Try either a 16-bit or
+ a 32-bit instruction. This is just a heuristic, so we do not worry
+ too much about false positives.*/
+
+ if (!found_stack_adjust)
+ {
+ if (pc - 4 < func_start)
+ return 0;
+ if (target_read_memory (pc - 4, buf, 4))
+ return 0;
+
+ insn = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 2, byte_order_for_code);
+ insn2 = extract_unsigned_integer (buf + 2, 2, byte_order_for_code);
+
+ if (insn2 == 0x46bd) /* mov sp, r7 */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn2 & 0xff00) == 0xb000) /* add sp, imm or sub sp, imm */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn2 & 0xff00) == 0xbc00) /* pop <registers> without PC */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if (insn == 0xe8bd) /* ldm.w sp!, <registers> */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if (insn == 0xf85d /* ldr.w <Rt>, [sp], #4 */
+ && (insn2 & 0x0fff) == 0x0b04)
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0xffbf) == 0xecbd /* vldm sp!, <list> */
+ && (insn2 & 0x0e00) == 0x0a00)
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ }
+
+ return found_stack_adjust;
+}
+
+/* Return true if we are in the function's epilogue, i.e. after the
+ instruction that destroyed the function's stack frame. */
+
+static int
+arm_in_function_epilogue_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ enum bfd_endian byte_order_for_code = gdbarch_byte_order_for_code (gdbarch);
+ unsigned int insn;
+ int found_return, found_stack_adjust;
+ CORE_ADDR func_start, func_end;
+
+ if (arm_pc_is_thumb (gdbarch, pc))
+ return thumb_in_function_epilogue_p (gdbarch, pc);
+
+ if (!find_pc_partial_function (pc, NULL, &func_start, &func_end))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* We are in the epilogue if the previous instruction was a stack
+ adjustment and the next instruction is a possible return (bx, mov
+ pc, or pop). We could have to scan backwards to find the stack
+ adjustment, or forwards to find the return, but this is a decent
+ approximation. First scan forwards. */
+
+ found_return = 0;
+ insn = read_memory_unsigned_integer (pc, 4, byte_order_for_code);
+ if (bits (insn, 28, 31) != INST_NV)
+ {
+ if ((insn & 0x0ffffff0) == 0x012fff10)
+ /* BX. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0x0ffffff0) == 0x01a0f000)
+ /* MOV PC. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0x0fff0000) == 0x08bd0000
+ && (insn & 0x0000c000) != 0)
+ /* POP (LDMIA), including PC or LR. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (!found_return)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Scan backwards. This is just a heuristic, so do not worry about
+ false positives from mode changes. */
+
+ if (pc < func_start + 4)
+ return 0;
+
+ insn = read_memory_unsigned_integer (pc - 4, 4, byte_order_for_code);
+ if (bits (insn, 28, 31) != INST_NV)
+ {
+ if ((insn & 0x0df0f000) == 0x0080d000)
+ /* ADD SP (register or immediate). */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0x0df0f000) == 0x0040d000)
+ /* SUB SP (register or immediate). */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0x0ffffff0) == 0x01a0d000)
+ /* MOV SP. */
+ found_return = 1;
+ else if ((insn & 0x0fff0000) == 0x08bd0000)
+ /* POP (LDMIA). */
+ found_stack_adjust = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (found_stack_adjust)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
/* When arguments must be pushed onto the stack, they go on in reverse
order. The code below implements a FILO (stack) to do this. */
@@ -6881,6 +7078,9 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
/* Advance PC across function entry code. */
set_gdbarch_skip_prologue (gdbarch, arm_skip_prologue);
+ /* Detect whether PC is in function epilogue. */
+ set_gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p (gdbarch, arm_in_function_epilogue_p);
+
/* Skip trampolines. */
set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code (gdbarch, arm_skip_stub);