summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5407-post-rewrite-hook.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* tests: use "test_hook" for misc "mkdir -p" and "chmod" casesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2022-03-171-8/+6
| | | | | | | | | Make use of "test_hook" in various cases that didn't fit neatly into preceding commits. Here we need to indent blocks in addition to changing the test code, or to make other small cosmetic changes. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* test-lib: split up and deprecate test_create_repo()Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2021-05-111-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Remove various redundant or obsolete code from the test_create_repo() function, and split up its use in test-lib.sh from what tests need from it. This leave us with a pass-through wrapper for "git init" in test-lib-functions.sh, in test-lib.sh we have the same, except for needing to redirect stdout/stderr, and emitting an error ourselves if it fails. We don't need to error() ourselves when test_create_repo() is invoked, as the invocation will be a part of a test's "&&"-chain. Everything below this paragraph is a detailed summary of the history of test_create_repo() explaining why it's safe to remove the various things it was doing: 1. "mkdir -p" isn't needed because "git init" itself will create leading directories if needed. 2. Since we're now a simple wrapper for "git init" we don't need to check that we have only one argument. If someone wants to run "test_create_repo --bare x" that's OK. 3. We won't ever hit that "Cannot setup test environment" error. Checking the test environment sanity when doing "git init" dates back to eea420693be (t0000: catch trivial pilot errors., 2005-12-10) and 2ccd2027b01 (trivial: check, if t/trash directory was successfully created, 2006-01-05). We can also see it in another form a bit later in my own 0d314ce834d (test-lib: use subshell instead of cd $new && .. && cd $old, 2010-08-30). But since 2006f0adaee (t/test-lib: make sure Git has already been built, 2012-09-17) we already check if we have a built git earlier. The one thing this was testing after that 2012 change was that we'd just built "git", but not "git-init", but since 3af4c7156c4 (tests: respect GIT_TEST_INSTALLED when initializing repositories, 2018-11-12) we invoke "git", not "git-init". So all of that's been checked already, and we don't need to re-check it here. 4. We don't need to move .git/hooks out of the way. That dates back to c09a69a83e3 (Disable hooks during tests., 2005-10-16), since then hooks became disabled by default in f98f8cbac01 (Ship sample hooks with .sample suffix, 2008-06-24). So the hooks were already disabled by default, but as can be seen from "mkdir .git/hooks" changes various tests needed to re-setup that directory. Now they no longer do. This makes us implicitly depend on the default hooks being disabled, which is a good thing. If and when we'd have any on-by-default hooks (I see no reason we ever would) we'd want to see the subtle and not so subtle ways that would break the test suite. 5. We don't need to "cd" to the "$repo" directory at all anymore. In the code being removed here we both "cd"'d to the repository before calling "init", and did so in a subshell. It's not important to do either, so both of those can be removed. We cd'd because this code grew from test-lib.sh code where we'd have done so already, see eedf8f97e58 (Abstract test_create_repo out for use in tests., 2006-02-17), and later "cd"'d inside a subshell since 0d314ce834d to avoid having to keep track of an "old pwd" variable to cd back after the setup. Being in the repository directory made moving the hooks around easier (we wouldn't have to fully qualify the path). Since we're not moving the hooks per #4 above we don't need to "cd" for that reason either. 6. We can drop the --template argument and instead rely on the GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR set to the same path earlier in test-lib.sh. See 8683a45d669 (Introduce GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR, 2006-12-19) 7. We only needed that ">&3 2>&4" redirection when invoked from test-lib.sh. We could still invoke test_create_repo() there, but as the invocation is now trivial and we don't have a good reason to use test_create_repo() elsewhere let's call "git init" there ourselves. 8. We didn't need to resolve "git" as "${GIT_TEST_INSTALLED:-$GIT_EXEC_PATH}/git$X" in test_create_repo(), even for the use of test-lib.sh PATH is already set up in test-lib.sh to start with GIT_TEST_INSTALLED and/or GIT_EXEC_PATH before test_create_repo() (now "git init") is called.. So we can simply run "git" and rely on the PATH lookup choosing the right executable. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin2020-11-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Carefully excluding t5310, which is developed independently of the current patch series at the time of writing, we now use `main` as default branch in t5[0-4]*. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t5[0-4]*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t5310\*) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin2020-11-191-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase: rename the two primary rebase backendsElijah Newren2020-02-161-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase tests: mark tests specific to the am-backend with --amElijah Newren2020-02-161-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | We have many rebase tests in the testsuite, and often the same test is repeated multiple times just testing different backends. For those tests that were specifically trying to test the am backend, add the --am flag. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests (rebase): spell out the `--keep-empty` optionJohannes Schindelin2019-04-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This test wants to run `git rebase` with the `--keep-empty` option, but it really only spelled out `--keep` and trusted Git's option parsing to determine that this was a unique abbreviation of the real option. However, Denton Liu contributed a patch series in https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1553354374.git.liu.denton@gmail.com/ that introduces a new `git rebase` option called `--keep-base`, which makes this previously unique abbreviation non-unique. Whether this patch series is accepted or not, it is actually a bad practice to use abbreviated options in our test suite, because of the issue that those unique option names are not guaranteed to stay unique in the future. So let's just not use abbreviated options in the test suite. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* am, rebase--merge: do not overlook --skip'ed commits with post-rewriteElijah Newren2018-12-281-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The post-rewrite hook is supposed to be invoked for each rewritten commit. The fact that a commit was selected and processed by the rebase operation (even though when we hit an error a user said it had no more useful changes), suggests we should write an entry for it. In particular, let's treat it as an empty commit trivially squashed into its parent. This brings the rebase--am and rebase--merge backends in sync with the behavior of the interactive rebase backend. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5407: add a test demonstrating how interactive handles --skip differentlyElijah Newren2018-12-281-0/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The post-rewrite hook is documented as being invoked by commands that rewrite commits such as commit --amend and rebase, and that it will be called for each rewritten commit. Apparently, the three backends handled --skip'ed commits differently: am: treat the skipped commit as though it weren't rewritten merge: same as 'am' backend interactive: treat skipped commits as having been rewritten to empty (view them as an empty fixup to their parent) For now, just add a testcase documenting the different behavior (use --keep to force usage of the interactive machinery even though we have no empty commits). A subsequent commit will remove the inconsistency in --skip handling. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5407: fix test to cover intended argumentsElijah Newren2018-06-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Test 8 in t5407 appears to be an accidental exact duplicate of of test 5; the testcode is identical and has identical repo state, but the test description is different and suggests that rebase -m followed by rebase --skip was what was actually supposed to be tested. Modify the test to include the -m option. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5407: use <<- to align the expected outputmm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-execJunio C Hamano2015-05-221-40/+40
| | | | Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec commandMatthieu Moy2015-05-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Usually, when 'git rebase' stops before completing the rebase, it is to give the user an opportunity to edit a commit (e.g. with the 'edit' command). In such cases, 'git rebase' leaves the sha1 of the commit being rewritten in "$state_dir"/stopped-sha, and subsequent 'git rebase --continue' will call the post-rewrite hook with this sha1 as <old-sha1> argument to the post-rewrite hook. The case of 'git rebase' stopping because of a failed 'exec' command is different: it gives the opportunity to the user to examine or fix the failure, but does not stop saying "here's a commit to edit, use --continue when you're done". So, there's no reason to call the post-rewrite hook for 'exec' commands. If the user did rewrite the commit, it would be with 'git commit --amend' which already called the post-rewrite hook. Fix the behavior to leave no stopped-sha file in case of failed exec command, and teach 'git rebase --continue' to skip record_in_rewritten if no stopped-sha file is found. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i: demonstrate incorrect behavior of post-rewriteMatthieu Moy2015-05-221-0/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The 'exec' command is sending the current commit to stopped-sha, which is supposed to contain the original commit (before rebase). As a result, if an 'exec' command fails, the next 'git rebase --continue' will send the current commit as <old-sha1> to the post-rewrite hook. The test currently fails with : --- expected.data 2015-05-21 17:55:29.000000000 +0000 +++ [...]post-rewrite.data 2015-05-21 17:55:29.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ 2362ae8e1b1b865e6161e6f0e165ffb974abf018 488028e9fac0b598b70cbeb594258a917e3f6fab +488028e9fac0b598b70cbeb594258a917e3f6fab 488028e9fac0b598b70cbeb594258a917e3f6fab babc8a4c7470895886fc129f1a015c486d05a351 8edffcc4e69a4e696a1d4bab047df450caf99507 Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* test: fix post rewrite hook reportFelipe Contreras2013-06-031-2/+2
| | | | | | | | First expected, then actual. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase --skip: correctly wrap-up when skipping the last patchJunio C Hamano2010-12-221-1/+17
| | | | | | | | When "rebase --skip" is used to skip the last patch in the series, the code to wrap up the rewrite by copying the notes from old to new commits and also by running the post-rewrite hook was bypassed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i: make post-rewrite work for 'edit'Thomas Rast2010-03-281-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The post-rewrite support, in the form of the call to 'record_in_rewritten', was hidden in the arm where we have to record a new commit for the user. This meant that it was never invoked in the case where the user has already amended the commit by herself. [The test is designed to exercise both arms of the 'if' in question.] Furthermore, recording the stopped-sha (the SHA1 of the commit before the editing) suffered from a cut&paste error from die_with_patch and used the wrong variable, hence it never recorded anything. Noticed by Junio. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i: invoke post-rewrite hookThomas Rast2010-03-121-0/+101
| | | | | | | | | | | Aside from the same issue that rebase also has (remembering the original commit across a conflict resolution), rebase -i brings an extra twist: We need to defer writing the rewritten list in the case of {squash,fixup} because their rewritten result should be the last commit in the squashed group. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase: invoke post-rewrite hookThomas Rast2010-03-121-0/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have to deal with two separate code paths: a normal rebase, which actually goes through git-am; and rebase {-m|-s}. The only small issue with both is that they need to remember the original sha1 across a possible conflict resolution. rebase -m already puts this information in $dotest/current, and we just introduce a similar file for git-am. Note that in git-am, the hook really only runs when coming from git-rebase: the code path that sets the $dotest/original-commit file is guarded by a test for $dotest/rebasing. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* commit --amend: invoke post-rewrite hookThomas Rast2010-03-121-0/+52
The rough structure of run_rewrite_hook() comes from run_receive_hook() in receive-pack. We introduce a --no-post-rewrite option and use it to avoid the hook when called from git-rebase -i 'edit'. The next patch will add full support in git-rebase, and we only want to invoke the hook once. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
View Lorry Controller Status