summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAsh McKenzie <amckenzie@gitlab.com>2019-09-13 16:15:43 +1000
committerAsh McKenzie <amckenzie@gitlab.com>2019-09-13 16:33:30 +1000
commit6d5c15d2ca4ce0653ebcfc0c5a9f3ea962d7b9a8 (patch)
tree170e217ac3b4ee18b91d73e11af3e5be8093a926
parent6f8ac067f547604a0bf0eb346f88f65daf8734dc (diff)
downloadgitlab-ce-ashmckenzie/add-reviewer-responsibility-section-docs.tar.gz
Add 'responsibility of the reviewer' sectionashmckenzie/add-reviewer-responsibility-section-docs
-rw-r--r--doc/development/code_review.md11
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/code_review.md b/doc/development/code_review.md
index d55623521e1..ce9f794c1a3 100644
--- a/doc/development/code_review.md
+++ b/doc/development/code_review.md
@@ -127,6 +127,17 @@ through Slack). If you can't assign a merge request, `@` mentioning a maintainer
This
[saves reviewers time and helps authors catch mistakes earlier](https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/11-proven-practices-for-peer-review/index.html#__RefHeading__97_174136755).
+### The responsibility of the reviewer
+
+[Review the merge request](#reviewing-code) thoroughly. When you are confident
+that it meets all requirements, you should:
+
+- Click the Approve button.
+- Advise the author their merge request has been reviewed and approved.
+- Assign the merge request to a maintainer. [Reviewer roulette](#reviewer-roulette)
+should have made a suggestion, but feel free to override if someone else is a
+better choice.
+
### The responsibility of the maintainer
Maintainers are responsible for the overall health, quality, and consistency of