Rename tfs.md to tfvc.md and updatedocs-rename-tfs

the tfs.md doc was actually about tfvc, so it was renamed
and content made more up to date, with light copy edits

3 files changed, 45 insertions, 43 deletions

diff --git a/doc/user/project/import/index.md b/doc/user/project/import/index.md
index 9d7463416d8..ecd491d8e5b 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/import/index.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/import/index.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 1. [From Gitea](gitea.md)
 1. [From Perforce](perforce.md)
 1. [From SVN](svn.md)
-1. [From TFS](tfs.md)
+1. [From TFVC](tfvc.md)
 1. [From repo by URL](repo_by_url.md)
 1. [By uploading a manifest file (AOSP)](manifest.md)
 1. [From Gemnasium](gemnasium.md)
diff --git a/doc/user/project/import/tfs.md b/doc/user/project/import/tfs.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 01bbb7e6ffd..00000000000
--- a/doc/user/project/import/tfs.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-# Migrating from TFS
-
-[TFS](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/server/) is a set of tools developed by Microsoft
-which also includes a centralized version control system (TFVC) similar to Git.
-
-In this document, we emphasize on the TFVC to Git migration.
-
-## TFVC vs Git
-
-The following list illustrates the main differences between TFVC and Git:
-
-- **Git is distributed** whereas TFVC is centralized using a client-server
-  architecture. This translates to Git having a more flexible workflow since
-  your working area is a copy of the entire repository. This decreases the
-  overhead when switching branches or merging for example, since you don't have
-  to communicate with a remote server.
-- **Storage method.** Changes in CVS are per file (changeset), while in Git
-  a committed file(s) is stored in its entirety (snapshot). That means that's
-  very easy in Git to revert or undo a whole change.
-
-Check also Microsoft's documentation on the
-[comparison of Git and TFVC](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/tfvc/comparison-git-tfvc?view=azure-devops)
-and the Wikipedia
-[comparison of version control software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_version_control_software).
-
-## Why migrate
-
-Migrating to Git/GitLab there is:
-
-- **No licensing costs**, Git is GPL while TFVC is proprietary.
-- **Shorter learning curve**, Git has a big community and a vast number of
-  tutorials to get you started (see our [Git topic](../../../topics/git/index.md)).
-- **Integration with modern tools**, migrating to Git and GitLab you can have
-  an open source end-to-end software development platform with built-in version
-  control, issue tracking, code review, CI/CD, and more.
-
-## How to migrate
-
-The best option to migrate from TFVC to Git is to use the
-[`git-tfs`](https://github.com/git-tfs/git-tfs) tool. A specific guide for the
-migration exists:
-[Migrate TFS to Git](https://github.com/git-tfs/git-tfs/blob/master/doc/usecases/migrate_tfs_to_git.md).
diff --git a/doc/user/project/import/tfvc.md b/doc/user/project/import/tfvc.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2fb0ef56699
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/user/project/import/tfvc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+---
+type: concepts
+---
+
+# Migrating from TFVC to Git
+
+Team Foundation Server (TFS), renamed [Azure DevOps Server](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/server/)
+in 2019, is a set of tools developed by Microsoft which also includes
+[Team Foundation Version Control](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/tfvc/overview)
+(TFVC), a centralized version control system similar to Git.
+
+In this document, we focus on the TFVC to Git migration.
+
+## TFVC vs Git
+
+The main differences between TFVC and Git are:
+
+- **Git is distributed:** While TFVC is centralized using a client-server architecture,
+  Git is distributed. This translates to Git having a more flexible workflow since
+  you work with a copy of the entire repository. This allows you to quickly
+  switch branches or merge, for example, without needing to communicate with a remote server.
+- **Storage:** Changes in a centralized version control system are per file (changeset),
+  while in Git a committed file is stored in its entirety (snapshot). That means that it is
+  very easy to revert or undo a whole change in Git.
+
+For more information, see Microsoft's [comparison of Git and TFVC](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/tfvc/comparison-git-tfvc?view=azure-devops)
+and the Wikipedia [comparison of version control software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_version_control_software).
+
+## Why migrate
+
+Advantages of migrating to Git/GitLab:
+
+- **No licensing costs:** Git is open source, while TFVC is proprietary.
+- **Shorter learning curve:** Git has a big community and a vast number of
+  tutorials to get you started (see our [Git topic](../../../topics/git/index.md)).
+- **Integration with modern tools:** After migrating to Git and GitLab, you will have
+  an open source, end-to-end software development platform with built-in version
+  control, issue tracking, code review, CI/CD, and more.
+
+## How to migrate
+
+The best option to migrate from TFVC to Git is to use the [`git-tfs`](https://github.com/git-tfs/git-tfs)
+tool. Read the [Migrate TFS to Git](https://github.com/git-tfs/git-tfs/blob/master/doc/usecases/migrate_tfs_to_git.md)
+guide for more details.