summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/danger/roulette/Dangerfile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSean McGivern <sean@gitlab.com>2019-04-08 11:44:57 +0100
committerSean McGivern <sean@gitlab.com>2019-04-08 11:56:17 +0100
commit28531ab43666b5fdf37e0a70db3bcbf7d3f92183 (patch)
tree8ce7838697b30f3dbbf59e974738a1b401593f6d /danger/roulette/Dangerfile
parent575ec3af131e9c101edfc50ee563381b37c8076e (diff)
downloadgitlab-ce-28531ab43666b5fdf37e0a70db3bcbf7d3f92183.tar.gz
Pick reviewers based on branch namestable-reviewer-roulette
Change reviewer roulette to always pick the same reviewers for the same branch name. We do this by: 1. Making the branch name 'canonical' across CE and EE by stripping a leading 'ce-' or 'ee-' and a trailing '-ce' or '-ee'. If people are following our branch naming guidelines, this should give the same branch name in both repos. 2. Converting the branch name to a stable integer by taking the integer form of its MD5. 3. Passing that integer as a seed to Ruby's `Random` class, which 'may be used to ensure repeatable sequences of pseudo-random numbers between different runs of the program' (from the Ruby documentation). The upshot is that the same branch name (in CE and EE) should always pick the same reviewers, and those should be evenly distributed across the set of possible reviewers due to the use of MD5.
Diffstat (limited to 'danger/roulette/Dangerfile')
-rw-r--r--danger/roulette/Dangerfile18
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/danger/roulette/Dangerfile b/danger/roulette/Dangerfile
index 406dc2c9724..e6820f49ee2 100644
--- a/danger/roulette/Dangerfile
+++ b/danger/roulette/Dangerfile
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'digest/md5'
+
MESSAGE = <<MARKDOWN
## Reviewer roulette
@@ -29,7 +31,9 @@ Please consider creating a merge request to
for them.
MARKDOWN
-def spin(team, project, category)
+def spin(team, project, category, branch_name)
+ rng = Random.new(Digest::MD5.hexdigest(branch_name).to_i(16))
+
reviewers = team.select { |member| member.reviewer?(project, category) }
traintainers = team.select { |member| member.traintainer?(project, category) }
maintainers = team.select { |member| member.maintainer?(project, category) }
@@ -41,8 +45,8 @@ def spin(team, project, category)
# https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/57653
# Make traintainers have triple the chance to be picked as a reviewer
- reviewer = (reviewers + traintainers + traintainers).sample
- maintainer = maintainers.sample
+ reviewer = (reviewers + traintainers + traintainers).sample(random: rng)
+ maintainer = maintainers.sample(random: rng)
"| #{helper.label_for_category(category)} | #{reviewer&.markdown_name} | #{maintainer&.markdown_name} |"
end
@@ -68,6 +72,12 @@ categories = changes.keys - [:unknown]
# CSS Clean up MRs are reviewed using a slightly different process, so we
# disable the review roulette for such MRs.
if changes.any? && !gitlab.mr_labels.include?('single codebase') && !gitlab.mr_labels.include?('CSS cleanup')
+ # Strip leading and trailing CE/EE markers
+ canonical_branch_name = gitlab
+ .mr_json['source_branch']
+ .gsub(/^[ce]e-/, '')
+ .gsub(/-[ce]e$/, '')
+
team =
begin
helper.project_team
@@ -82,7 +92,7 @@ if changes.any? && !gitlab.mr_labels.include?('single codebase') && !gitlab.mr_l
project = helper.project_name
unknown = changes.fetch(:unknown, [])
- rows = categories.map { |category| spin(team, project, category) }
+ rows = categories.map { |category| spin(team, project, category, canonical_branch_name) }
markdown(MESSAGE)
markdown(CATEGORY_TABLE_HEADER + rows.join("\n")) unless rows.empty?