Add latest changes from gitlab-org/gitlab@13-7-stable-eev13.7.0-rc2

396 files changed, 8573 insertions, 3128 deletions

diff --git a/spec/config/object_store_settings_spec.rb b/spec/config/object_store_settings_spec.rb
index 430ba1205cb..46665b6c464 100644
--- a/spec/config/object_store_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/config/object_store_settings_spec.rb
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ RSpec.describe ObjectStoreSettings do
         expect(settings.artifacts['object_store']['background_upload']).to be false
         expect(settings.artifacts['object_store']['proxy_download']).to be false
         expect(settings.artifacts['object_store']['remote_directory']).to eq('artifacts')
+        expect(settings.artifacts['object_store']['consolidated_settings']).to be true
 
         expect(settings.lfs['enabled']).to be true
         expect(settings.lfs['object_store']['enabled']).to be true
@@ -67,15 +68,18 @@ RSpec.describe ObjectStoreSettings do
         expect(settings.lfs['object_store']['background_upload']).to be false
         expect(settings.lfs['object_store']['proxy_download']).to be true
         expect(settings.lfs['object_store']['remote_directory']).to eq('lfs-objects')
+        expect(settings.lfs['object_store']['consolidated_settings']).to be true
 
         expect(settings.pages['enabled']).to be true
         expect(settings.pages['object_store']['enabled']).to be true
         expect(settings.pages['object_store']['connection']).to eq(connection)
         expect(settings.pages['object_store']['remote_directory']).to eq('pages')
+        expect(settings.pages['object_store']['consolidated_settings']).to be true
 
         expect(settings.external_diffs['enabled']).to be false
         expect(settings.external_diffs['object_store']['enabled']).to be false
         expect(settings.external_diffs['object_store']['remote_directory']).to eq('external_diffs')
+        expect(settings.external_diffs['object_store']['consolidated_settings']).to be true
       end
 
       it 'raises an error when a bucket is missing' do
@@ -90,6 +94,31 @@ RSpec.describe ObjectStoreSettings do
         expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
       end
 
+      it 'allows pages to define its own connection' do
+        pages_connection = { 'provider' => 'Google', 'google_application_default' => true }
+        config['pages'] = {
+          'enabled' => true,
+          'object_store' => {
+            'enabled' => true,
+            'connection' => pages_connection
+          }
+        }
+
+        expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
+
+        described_class::WORKHORSE_ACCELERATED_TYPES.each do |object_type|
+          section = settings.try(object_type)
+
+          next unless section
+
+          expect(section['object_store']['connection']).to eq(connection)
+          expect(section['object_store']['consolidated_settings']).to be true
+        end
+
+        expect(settings.pages['object_store']['connection']).to eq(pages_connection)
+        expect(settings.pages['object_store']['consolidated_settings']).to be_falsey
+      end
+
       context 'with legacy config' do
         let(:legacy_settings) do
           {
diff --git a/spec/controllers/admin/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/admin/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
index 2a77693061c..d1ca64d6bd2 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/admin/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/admin/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ RSpec.describe Admin::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
       post :create, params: params
     end
 
-    let(:application) { 'helm' }
+    let(:application) { 'ingress' }
     let(:params) { { application: application, id: cluster.id } }
 
     describe 'functionality' do
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ RSpec.describe Admin::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
         expect { subject }.to change { current_application.count }
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
-        expect(cluster.application_helm).to be_scheduled
+        expect(cluster.application_ingress).to be_scheduled
       end
 
       context 'when cluster do not exists' do
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ RSpec.describe Admin::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
       context 'when application is already installing' do
         before do
-          create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installing, cluster: cluster)
+          create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installing, cluster: cluster)
         end
 
         it 'returns 400' do
diff --git a/spec/controllers/dashboard_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/dashboard_controller_spec.rb
index 9b78f841cce..c838affa239 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/dashboard_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/dashboard_controller_spec.rb
@@ -15,16 +15,6 @@ RSpec.describe DashboardController do
     describe 'GET issues' do
       it_behaves_like 'issuables list meta-data', :issue, :issues
       it_behaves_like 'issuables requiring filter', :issues
-
-      it 'lists only incidents and issues' do
-        issue = create(:incident, project: project, author: user)
-        incident = create(:incident, project: project, author: user)
-        create(:quality_test_case, project: project, author: user)
-
-        get :issues, params: { author_id: user.id }
-
-        expect(assigns(:issues)).to match_array([issue, incident])
-      end
     end
 
     describe 'GET merge requests' do
diff --git a/spec/controllers/groups/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/groups/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
index c1d170edce3..c3947c27399 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/groups/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/groups/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ RSpec.describe Groups::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
       post :create, params: params.merge(group_id: group)
     end
 
-    let(:application) { 'helm' }
+    let(:application) { 'ingress' }
     let(:params) { { application: application, id: cluster.id } }
 
     describe 'functionality' do
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ RSpec.describe Groups::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
         expect { subject }.to change { current_application.count }
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
-        expect(cluster.application_helm).to be_scheduled
+        expect(cluster.application_ingress).to be_scheduled
       end
 
       context 'when cluster do not exists' do
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ RSpec.describe Groups::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
       context 'when application is already installing' do
         before do
-          create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installing, cluster: cluster)
+          create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installing, cluster: cluster)
         end
 
         it 'returns 400' do
diff --git a/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb
index 55833ee3aad..90b38799629 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb
@@ -400,15 +400,6 @@ RSpec.describe GroupsController, factory_default: :keep do
       sign_in(user)
     end
 
-    it 'lists only incidents and issues' do
-      incident = create(:incident, project: project)
-      create(:quality_test_case, project: project)
-
-      get :issues, params: { id: group.to_param }
-
-      expect(assigns(:issues)).to match_array([issue_1, issue_2, incident])
-    end
-
     context 'sorting by votes' do
       it 'sorts most popular issues' do
         get :issues, params: { id: group.to_param, sort: 'upvotes_desc' }
diff --git a/spec/controllers/help_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/help_controller_spec.rb
index 9ac42cbc3ec..6927df3b1c7 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/help_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/help_controller_spec.rb
@@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ RSpec.describe HelpController do
     context 'for Markdown formats' do
       context 'when requested file exists' do
         before do
-          expect(File).to receive(:read).and_return(fixture_file('blockquote_fence_after.md'))
+          expect_file_read(File.join(Rails.root, 'doc/ssh/README.md'), content: fixture_file('blockquote_fence_after.md'))
+
           get :show, params: { path: 'ssh/README' }, format: :md
         end
 
@@ -213,6 +214,6 @@ RSpec.describe HelpController do
   end
 
   def stub_readme(content)
-    expect(File).to receive(:read).and_return(content)
+    expect_file_read(Rails.root.join('doc', 'README.md'), content: content)
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
index b50814b4790..cc6170252c1 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/clusters/applications_controller_spec.rb
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
     let(:cluster) { create(:cluster, :project, :provided_by_gcp) }
     let(:project) { cluster.project }
-    let(:application) { 'helm' }
+    let(:application) { 'ingress' }
     let(:params) { { application: application, id: cluster.id } }
 
     describe 'functionality' do
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
         expect { subject }.to change { current_application.count }
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
-        expect(cluster.application_helm).to be_scheduled
+        expect(cluster.application_ingress).to be_scheduled
       end
 
       context 'when cluster do not exists' do
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::Clusters::ApplicationsController do
 
       context 'when application is already installing' do
         before do
-          create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installing, cluster: cluster)
+          create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installing, cluster: cluster)
         end
 
         it 'returns 400' do
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb
index 012a98f433e..ced590039e1 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb
@@ -41,27 +41,6 @@ RSpec.describe ProjectsController do
           end
         end
       end
-
-      context 'with the new_create_project_ui experiment enabled and the user is part of the control group' do
-        before do
-          stub_experiment(new_create_project_ui: true)
-          stub_experiment_for_user(new_create_project_ui: false)
-          allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:experimentation_subject_id).and_return('uuid')
-        end
-
-        it 'passes the right tracking parameters to the frontend' do
-          get(:new)
-
-          expect(Gon.tracking_data).to eq(
-            {
-              category: 'Manage::Import::Experiment::NewCreateProjectUi',
-              action: 'click_tab',
-              label: 'uuid',
-              property: 'control_group'
-            }
-          )
-        end
-      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/deprecation_toolkit_env.rb b/spec/deprecation_toolkit_env.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bc90f67f0db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/deprecation_toolkit_env.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+if ENV.key?('RECORD_DEPRECATIONS')
+  require 'deprecation_toolkit'
+  require 'deprecation_toolkit/rspec'
+  DeprecationToolkit::Configuration.test_runner = :rspec
+  DeprecationToolkit::Configuration.deprecation_path = 'deprecations'
+  DeprecationToolkit::Configuration.behavior = DeprecationToolkit::Behaviors::Record
+
+  # Enable ruby deprecations for keywords, it's suppressed by default in Ruby 2.7.2
+  Warning[:deprecated] = true
+
+  kwargs_warnings = [
+    # Taken from https://github.com/jeremyevans/ruby-warning/blob/1.1.0/lib/warning.rb#L18
+    %r{warning: (?:Using the last argument (?:for `.+' )?as keyword parameters is deprecated; maybe \*\* should be added to the call|Passing the keyword argument (?:for `.+' )?as the last hash parameter is deprecated|Splitting the last argument (?:for `.+' )?into positional and keyword parameters is deprecated|The called method (?:`.+' )?is defined here)\n\z}
+  ]
+  DeprecationToolkit::Configuration.warnings_treated_as_deprecation = kwargs_warnings
+end
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb b/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb
index 11719e40cf2..c3d6e9d7569 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb
@@ -356,6 +356,12 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       end
     end
 
+    trait :codequality_reports do
+      after(:build) do |build|
+        build.job_artifacts << create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality, job: build)
+      end
+    end
+
     trait :terraform_reports do
       after(:build) do |build|
         build.job_artifacts << create(:ci_job_artifact, :terraform, job: build)
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb b/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb
index 223184891b7..0f5ad013a64 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb
@@ -245,7 +245,17 @@ FactoryBot.define do
 
       after(:build) do |artifact, evaluator|
         artifact.file = fixture_file_upload(
-          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json'), 'application/json')
+          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate.json'), 'application/json')
+      end
+    end
+
+    trait :codequality_without_errors do
+      file_type { :codequality }
+      file_format { :raw }
+
+      after(:build) do |artifact, evaluator|
+        artifact.file = fixture_file_upload(
+          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate_without_errors.json'), 'application/json')
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb b/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb
index 14bd0ab1bc6..ea22fba37c9 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb
@@ -145,6 +145,14 @@ FactoryBot.define do
         end
       end
 
+      trait :with_codequality_reports do
+        status { :success }
+
+        after(:build) do |pipeline, evaluator|
+          pipeline.builds << build(:ci_build, :codequality_reports, pipeline: pipeline, project: pipeline.project)
+        end
+      end
+
       trait :with_coverage_report_artifact do
         after(:build) do |pipeline, evaluator|
           pipeline.pipeline_artifacts << build(:ci_pipeline_artifact, pipeline: pipeline, project: pipeline.project)
diff --git a/spec/factories/exported_protected_branches.rb b/spec/factories/exported_protected_branches.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7ad49b12e5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/factories/exported_protected_branches.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+FactoryBot.define do
+  factory :exported_protected_branch, class: 'ExportedProtectedBranch', parent: :protected_branch
+end
diff --git a/spec/factories/issues.rb b/spec/factories/issues.rb
index 90e43b9e22c..5c62de4d08d 100644
--- a/spec/factories/issues.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/issues.rb
@@ -52,9 +52,5 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     factory :incident do
       issue_type { :incident }
     end
-
-    factory :quality_test_case do
-      issue_type { :test_case }
-    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb b/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb
index e5381071228..998d93420d1 100644
--- a/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       target_branch { 'pages-deploy-target' }
 
       transient do
-        deployment { create(:deployment, :review_app) }
+        deployment { association(:deployment, :review_app) }
       end
 
       after(:build) do |merge_request, evaluator|
diff --git a/spec/factories/packages/package_file.rb b/spec/factories/packages/package_file.rb
index 643ab8e4f95..bee1b2076df 100644
--- a/spec/factories/packages/package_file.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/packages/package_file.rb
@@ -152,14 +152,6 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       file_store { Packages::PackageFileUploader::Store::REMOTE }
     end
 
-    trait(:checksummed) do
-      verification_checksum { 'abc' }
-    end
-
-    trait(:checksum_failure) do
-      verification_failure { 'Could not calculate the checksum' }
-    end
-
     factory :package_file_with_file, traits: [:jar]
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/project_settings.rb b/spec/factories/project_settings.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c0c5039ab51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/factories/project_settings.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+FactoryBot.define do
+  factory :project_setting do
+    project
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/factories/sent_notifications.rb b/spec/factories/sent_notifications.rb
index 11116af7dbb..f10a3235202 100644
--- a/spec/factories/sent_notifications.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/sent_notifications.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
   factory :sent_notification do
     project
     recipient { project.creator }
-    noteable { create(:issue, project: project) }
+    noteable { association(:issue, project: project) }
     reply_key { SentNotification.reply_key }
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/terraform/state.rb b/spec/factories/terraform/state.rb
index c54a8aedbc6..fb63c845073 100644
--- a/spec/factories/terraform/state.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/terraform/state.rb
@@ -6,11 +6,6 @@ FactoryBot.define do
 
     sequence(:name) { |n| "state-#{n}" }
 
-    trait :with_file do
-      versioning_enabled { false }
-      file { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/terraform/terraform.tfstate', 'application/json') }
-    end
-
     trait :locked do
       sequence(:lock_xid) { |n| "lock-#{n}" }
       locked_at { Time.current }
@@ -22,8 +17,5 @@ FactoryBot.define do
         create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: state)
       end
     end
-
-    # Remove with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/235108
-    factory :legacy_terraform_state, parent: :terraform_state, traits: [:with_file]
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/users.rb b/spec/factories/users.rb
index 1b430009ab5..50656d14eb7 100644
--- a/spec/factories/users.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/users.rb
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       user_type { :alert_bot }
     end
 
+    trait :deactivated do
+      after(:build) { |user, _| user.deactivate! }
+    end
+
     trait :project_bot do
       user_type { :project_bot }
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_abuse_reports_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_abuse_reports_spec.rb
index 845e186dd5b..192182adddc 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_abuse_reports_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_abuse_reports_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::AbuseReports", :js do
 
   context 'as an admin' do
     before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      admin = create(:admin)
+      sign_in(admin)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     end
 
     describe 'if a user has been reported for abuse' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_appearance_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_appearance_spec.rb
index 48aaec6e6df..67a8d6ec601 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_appearance_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_appearance_spec.rb
@@ -4,9 +4,11 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   let!(:appearance) { create(:appearance) }
+  let(:admin) { create(:admin) }
 
   it 'Create new appearance' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     visit admin_appearances_path
 
     fill_in 'appearance_title', with: 'MyCompany'
@@ -26,7 +28,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   end
 
   it 'Preview sign-in page appearance' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
     visit admin_appearances_path
     click_link "Sign-in page"
@@ -35,7 +38,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   end
 
   it 'Preview new project page appearance' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
     visit admin_appearances_path
     click_link "New project page"
@@ -45,7 +49,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
 
   context 'Custom system header and footer' do
     before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      sign_in(admin)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     end
 
     context 'when system header and footer messages are empty' do
@@ -82,7 +87,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   end
 
   it 'Custom new project page' do
-    sign_in create(:user)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     visit new_project_path
 
     expect_custom_new_project_appearance(appearance)
@@ -91,6 +97,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   context 'Profile page with custom profile image guidelines' do
     before do
       sign_in(create(:admin))
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
       visit admin_appearances_path
       fill_in 'appearance_profile_image_guidelines', with: 'Custom profile image guidelines, please :smile:!'
       click_button 'Update appearance settings'
@@ -105,7 +112,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   end
 
   it 'Appearance logo' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     visit admin_appearances_path
 
     attach_file(:appearance_logo, logo_fixture)
@@ -117,7 +125,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   end
 
   it 'Header logos' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     visit admin_appearances_path
 
     attach_file(:appearance_header_logo, logo_fixture)
@@ -129,7 +138,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Appearance' do
   end
 
   it 'Favicon' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     visit admin_appearances_path
 
     attach_file(:appearance_favicon, logo_fixture)
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_broadcast_messages_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_broadcast_messages_spec.rb
index 091ed0a3396..586785272ae 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_broadcast_messages_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_broadcast_messages_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Admin Broadcast Messages' do
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     create(:broadcast_message, :expired, message: 'Migration to new server')
     visit admin_broadcast_messages_path
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_browse_spam_logs_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_browse_spam_logs_spec.rb
index 65847876c11..9f63c8b5223 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_browse_spam_logs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_browse_spam_logs_spec.rb
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin browse spam logs' do
   let!(:spam_log) { create(:spam_log, description: 'abcde ' * 20) }
 
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   it 'Browse spam logs' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_builds_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_builds_spec.rb
index 166fde0f37a..42827dd5b49 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_builds_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_builds_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Admin Builds' do
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   describe 'GET /admin/builds' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_cohorts_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_cohorts_spec.rb
index f91446ed222..982a9333275 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_cohorts_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_cohorts_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Cohorts page' do
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   context 'with usage ping enabled' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_deploy_keys_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_deploy_keys_spec.rb
index 2039a6ff1ee..c326d0fd741 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_deploy_keys_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_deploy_keys_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin deploy keys' do
   let!(:another_deploy_key) { create(:another_deploy_key, public: true) }
 
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   it 'show all public deploy keys' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_dev_ops_report_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_dev_ops_report_spec.rb
index 3b2c9d75870..a05fa0640d8 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_dev_ops_report_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_dev_ops_report_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'DevOps Report page', :js do
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   context 'with devops_adoption feature flag disabled' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_git_access_protocol_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_git_access_protocol_spec.rb
index d7feb21a8b3..f7f0592a315 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_git_access_protocol_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_git_access_protocol_spec.rb
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin disables Git access protocol', :js do
   before do
     stub_env('IN_MEMORY_APPLICATION_SETTINGS', 'false')
     sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   context 'with HTTP disabled' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_two_factor_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_two_factor_spec.rb
index 216c8ae36c7..1f34c4ed17c 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_two_factor_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_disables_two_factor_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Admin disables 2FA for a user' do
   it 'successfully', :js do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     user = create(:user, :two_factor)
 
     edit_user(user)
@@ -19,7 +21,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin disables 2FA for a user' do
   end
 
   it 'for a user without 2FA enabled' do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     user = create(:user)
 
     edit_user(user)
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_groups_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_groups_spec.rb
index 96709cf8a12..c05e90d145e 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_groups_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_groups_spec.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Groups' do
 
   before do
     sign_in(current_user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(current_user)
     stub_application_setting(default_group_visibility: internal)
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_health_check_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_health_check_spec.rb
index dfc7f5f6f84..0f6cba6c105 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_health_check_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_health_check_spec.rb
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin Health Check", :feature do
   before do
     stub_env('IN_MEMORY_APPLICATION_SETTINGS', 'false')
     sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   describe '#show' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_hook_logs_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_hook_logs_spec.rb
index f4a70621cee..3f63bf9a15c 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_hook_logs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_hook_logs_spec.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin::HookLogs' do
   let(:hook_log) { create(:web_hook_log, web_hook: system_hook, internal_error_message: 'some error') }
 
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   it 'show list of hook logs' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_hooks_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_hooks_spec.rb
index 1c14d65a1cd..3fed402267c 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_hooks_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_hooks_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin::Hooks' do
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(user)
   end
 
   describe 'GET /admin/hooks' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_labels_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_labels_spec.rb
index 35638e0829b..815a73b1450 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_labels_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_labels_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin issues labels' do
   let!(:feature_label) { Label.create(title: 'feature', template: true) }
 
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   describe 'list' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb
index 7a9a6f2ccb8..e54837ede11 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'admin manage applications' do
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   it 'creates new oauth application' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/login_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/login_spec.rb
index 7cbba9ec674..f1dee075925 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/login_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/login_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'Admin Mode Login', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
+RSpec.describe 'Admin Mode Login' do
   include TermsHelper
   include UserLoginHelper
   include LdapHelpers
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/logout_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/logout_spec.rb
index b4d49fe760f..b7fa59bbfb7 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/logout_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/logout_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'Admin Mode Logout', :js, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
+RSpec.describe 'Admin Mode Logout', :js do
   include TermsHelper
   include UserLoginHelper
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/workers_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/workers_spec.rb
index d037f5555dc..fbbcf19063b 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/workers_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode/workers_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 # Test an operation that triggers background jobs requiring administrative rights
-RSpec.describe 'Admin mode for workers', :do_not_mock_admin_mode, :request_store, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
+RSpec.describe 'Admin mode for workers', :request_store do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:user_to_delete) { create(:user) }
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode_spec.rb
index 3b4edbc1a07..8169b3a20db 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_mode_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_mode_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'Admin mode', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
+RSpec.describe 'Admin mode' do
   include MobileHelpers
   include StubENV
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_projects_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_projects_spec.rb
index 522da760062..ff4e592234b 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_projects_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_projects_spec.rb
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Projects" do
 
   before do
     sign_in(current_user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(current_user)
   end
 
   describe "GET /admin/projects" do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_requests_profiles_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_requests_profiles_spec.rb
index c649fdd8e19..e92528d431d 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_requests_profiles_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_requests_profiles_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin::RequestsProfilesController' do
 
   before do
     stub_const('Gitlab::RequestProfiler::PROFILES_DIR', tmpdir)
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   after do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb
index 0e20ccf6bec..e16cde3fa1c 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin Runners" do
 
   before do
     stub_env('IN_MEMORY_APPLICATION_SETTINGS', 'false')
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   describe "Runners page" do
@@ -282,6 +284,12 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin Runners" do
       visit admin_runner_path(runner)
     end
 
+    describe 'runner page breadcrumbs' do
+      it 'contains the current runner’s short sha' do
+        expect(page.find('h2')).to have_content(runner.short_sha)
+      end
+    end
+
     describe 'projects' do
       it 'contains project names' do
         expect(page).to have_content(@project1.full_name)
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_project_statistics_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_project_statistics_spec.rb
index d94889b825a..be781730924 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_project_statistics_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_project_statistics_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin > Admin sees project statistics" do
 
   before do
     sign_in(current_user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(current_user)
 
     visit admin_project_path(project)
   end
@@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin > Admin sees project statistics" do
     let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
 
     it "shows project statistics" do
-      expect(page).to have_content("Storage: 0 Bytes (Repository: 0 Bytes / Wikis: 0 Bytes / Build Artifacts: 0 Bytes / LFS: 0 Bytes / Snippets: 0 Bytes)")
+      expect(page).to have_content("Storage: 0 Bytes (Repository: 0 Bytes / Wikis: 0 Bytes / Build Artifacts: 0 Bytes / LFS: 0 Bytes / Snippets: 0 Bytes / Packages: 0 Bytes / Uploads: 0 Bytes)")
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_projects_statistics_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_projects_statistics_spec.rb
index 786fa98255c..2e96814d1e9 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_projects_statistics_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_sees_projects_statistics_spec.rb
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin > Admin sees projects statistics" do
     create(:project, :repository) { |project| project.statistics.destroy }
 
     sign_in(current_user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(current_user)
 
     visit admin_projects_path
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_serverless_domains_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_serverless_domains_spec.rb
index 256887f425f..fc84df91854 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_serverless_domains_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_serverless_domains_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin Serverless Domains', :js do
 
   before do
     allow(Gitlab.config.pages).to receive(:enabled).and_return(true)
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   it 'Add domain with certificate' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb
index 8929abc7edc..9d1e71092ae 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'Admin updates settings', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
+RSpec.describe 'Admin updates settings' do
   include StubENV
   include TermsHelper
   include UsageDataHelpers
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_system_info_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_system_info_spec.rb
index 6a0448fd890..2225f25aa1e 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_system_info_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_system_info_spec.rb
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Admin System Info' do
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   describe 'GET /admin/system_info' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_users_impersonation_tokens_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_users_impersonation_tokens_spec.rb
index ec3dd322f97..cae190e76b0 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_users_impersonation_tokens_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_users_impersonation_tokens_spec.rb
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin > Users > Impersonation Tokens', :js do
 
   before do
     sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   describe "token creation" do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_users_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_users_spec.rb
index 97a30143a59..8809d04e6ec 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_users_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_users_spec.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Users" do
 
   before do
     sign_in(current_user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(current_user)
   end
 
   describe "GET /admin/users" do
@@ -205,8 +206,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Users" do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when blocking a user' do
-      it 'shows confirmation and allows blocking', :js do
+    context 'when blocking/unblocking a user' do
+      it 'shows confirmation and allows blocking and unblocking', :js do
         expect(page).to have_content(user.email)
 
         find("[data-testid='user-action-button-#{user.id}']").click
@@ -228,6 +229,30 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Users" do
 
         expect(page).to have_content('Successfully blocked')
         expect(page).not_to have_content(user.email)
+
+        click_link 'Blocked'
+
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page).to have_content(user.email)
+
+        find("[data-testid='user-action-button-#{user.id}']").click
+
+        within find("[data-testid='user-action-dropdown-#{user.id}']") do
+          find('li button', text: 'Unblock').click
+        end
+
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page).to have_content('Unblock user')
+        expect(page).to have_content('You can always block their account again if needed.')
+
+        find('.modal-footer button', text: 'Unblock').click
+
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page).to have_content('Successfully unblocked')
+        expect(page).not_to have_content(user.email)
       end
     end
   end
@@ -388,8 +413,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Users" do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when blocking the user' do
-      it 'shows confirmation and allows blocking', :js do
+    context 'when blocking/unblocking the user' do
+      it 'shows confirmation and allows blocking and unblocking', :js do
         visit admin_user_path(user)
 
         find('button', text: 'Block user').click
@@ -405,6 +430,20 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Users" do
 
         expect(page).to have_content('Successfully blocked')
         expect(page).to have_content('This user is blocked')
+
+        find('button', text: 'Unblock user').click
+
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page).to have_content('Unblock user')
+        expect(page).to have_content('You can always block their account again if needed.')
+
+        find('.modal-footer button', text: 'Unblock').click
+
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page).to have_content('Successfully unblocked')
+        expect(page).to have_content('Block this user')
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb
index 0fb5124f673..0e448446085 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'Admin uses repository checks', :request_store, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
+RSpec.describe 'Admin uses repository checks', :request_store do
   include StubENV
 
   let(:admin) { create(:admin) }
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/clusters/applications_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/clusters/applications_spec.rb
index 3bcadfdbfc1..e083e4fee4c 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/clusters/applications_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/clusters/applications_spec.rb
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Instance-level Cluster Applications', :js do
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(user)
   end
 
   describe 'Installing applications' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/clusters/eks_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/clusters/eks_spec.rb
index ad7122bf182..a1bac720349 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/clusters/eks_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/clusters/eks_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Instance-level AWS EKS Cluster', :js do
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(user)
   end
 
   context 'when user does not have a cluster and visits group clusters page' do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/dashboard_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/dashboard_spec.rb
index acb8fb54e11..c040811ada1 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/dashboard_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/dashboard_spec.rb
@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin visits dashboard' do
   include ProjectForksHelper
 
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
   end
 
   context 'counting forks', :js do
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/services/admin_activates_prometheus_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/services/admin_activates_prometheus_spec.rb
index 199eae59afc..a225de365c8 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/services/admin_activates_prometheus_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/services/admin_activates_prometheus_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin activates Prometheus', :js do
 
   before do
     sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
     visit(admin_application_settings_services_path)
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/services/admin_visits_service_templates_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/services/admin_visits_service_templates_spec.rb
index a37e57304aa..563bca8b32f 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/services/admin_visits_service_templates_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/services/admin_visits_service_templates_spec.rb
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Admin visits service templates' do
 
   before do
     sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
     visit(admin_application_settings_services_path)
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/alerts_settings/user_views_alerts_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/alerts_settings/user_views_alerts_settings_spec.rb
index 0ded13ae607..698a36d3f76 100644
--- a/spec/features/alerts_settings/user_views_alerts_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/alerts_settings/user_views_alerts_settings_spec.rb
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Alert integrations settings form', :js do
   end
 
   describe 'when viewing alert integrations as a maintainer' do
-    context 'with feature flag enabled' do
+    context 'with the default page permissions' do
       before do
         visit project_settings_operations_path(project, anchor: 'js-alert-management-settings')
         wait_for_requests
@@ -33,19 +33,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Alert integrations settings form', :js do
         expect(page).to have_content('1. Select integration type')
       end
     end
-
-    context 'with feature flag disabled' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(http_integrations_list: false)
-
-        visit project_settings_operations_path(project, anchor: 'js-alert-management-settings')
-        wait_for_requests
-      end
-
-      it 'shows the old alerts setting form' do
-        expect(page).to have_content('Webhook URL')
-      end
-    end
   end
 
   describe 'when viewing alert integrations as a developer' do
diff --git a/spec/features/boards/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb b/spec/features/boards/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb
index f51b4d21e3b..cefb486349d 100644
--- a/spec/features/boards/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/boards/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Issue Boards shortcut', :js do
     before do
       create(:board, project: project)
 
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      admin = create(:admin)
+      sign_in(admin)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
       visit project_path(project)
     end
@@ -26,7 +28,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Issue Boards shortcut', :js do
     let(:project) { create(:project, :issues_disabled) }
 
     before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      admin = create(:admin)
+      sign_in(admin)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
       visit project_path(project)
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/breadcrumbs_schema_markup_spec.rb b/spec/features/breadcrumbs_schema_markup_spec.rb
index 30d5f40fea8..a87a3d284de 100644
--- a/spec/features/breadcrumbs_schema_markup_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/breadcrumbs_schema_markup_spec.rb
@@ -15,15 +15,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'Breadcrumbs schema markup', :aggregate_failures do
 
     item_list = get_schema_content
 
-    expect(item_list.size).to eq 3
+    expect(item_list.size).to eq 2
     expect(item_list[0]['name']).to eq project.namespace.name
     expect(item_list[0]['item']).to eq user_url(project.owner)
 
     expect(item_list[1]['name']).to eq project.name
     expect(item_list[1]['item']).to eq project_url(project)
-
-    expect(item_list[2]['name']).to eq 'Details'
-    expect(item_list[2]['item']).to eq project_url(project)
   end
 
   it 'generates the breadcrumb schema for group projects' do
@@ -31,7 +28,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Breadcrumbs schema markup', :aggregate_failures do
 
     item_list = get_schema_content
 
-    expect(item_list.size).to eq 4
+    expect(item_list.size).to eq 3
     expect(item_list[0]['name']).to eq group.name
     expect(item_list[0]['item']).to eq group_url(group)
 
@@ -40,9 +37,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Breadcrumbs schema markup', :aggregate_failures do
 
     expect(item_list[2]['name']).to eq group_project.name
     expect(item_list[2]['item']).to eq project_url(group_project)
-
-    expect(item_list[3]['name']).to eq 'Details'
-    expect(item_list[3]['item']).to eq project_url(group_project)
   end
 
   it 'generates the breadcrumb schema for group' do
@@ -50,15 +44,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'Breadcrumbs schema markup', :aggregate_failures do
 
     item_list = get_schema_content
 
-    expect(item_list.size).to eq 3
+    expect(item_list.size).to eq 2
     expect(item_list[0]['name']).to eq group.name
     expect(item_list[0]['item']).to eq group_url(group)
 
     expect(item_list[1]['name']).to eq subgroup.name
     expect(item_list[1]['item']).to eq group_url(subgroup)
-
-    expect(item_list[2]['name']).to eq 'Details'
-    expect(item_list[2]['item']).to eq group_url(subgroup)
   end
 
   it 'generates the breadcrumb schema for issues' do
diff --git a/spec/features/clusters/cluster_detail_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/clusters/cluster_detail_page_spec.rb
index 31d6bcda9e8..6fe6c099d80 100644
--- a/spec/features/clusters/cluster_detail_page_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/clusters/cluster_detail_page_spec.rb
@@ -168,6 +168,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Clusterable > Show page' do
     let(:cluster_path) { admin_cluster_path(cluster) }
     let(:cluster) { create(:cluster, :provided_by_gcp, :instance) }
 
+    before do
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(current_user)
+    end
+
     it_behaves_like 'show page' do
       let(:cluster_type_label) { 'Instance cluster' }
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/merge_requests_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/merge_requests_spec.rb
index 952a78ec79a..0237bbc793b 100644
--- a/spec/features/dashboard/merge_requests_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/dashboard/merge_requests_spec.rb
@@ -52,20 +52,29 @@ RSpec.describe 'Dashboard Merge Requests' do
   end
 
   context 'merge requests exist' do
+    let_it_be(:author_user) { create(:user) }
     let(:label) { create(:label) }
 
     let!(:assigned_merge_request) do
       create(:merge_request,
         assignees: [current_user],
         source_project: project,
-        author: create(:user))
+        author: author_user)
+    end
+
+    let!(:review_requested_merge_request) do
+      create(:merge_request,
+        reviewers: [current_user],
+        source_branch: 'review',
+        source_project: project,
+        author: author_user)
     end
 
     let!(:assigned_merge_request_from_fork) do
       create(:merge_request,
               source_branch: 'markdown', assignees: [current_user],
               target_project: public_project, source_project: forked_project,
-              author: create(:user))
+              author: author_user)
     end
 
     let!(:authored_merge_request) do
@@ -94,7 +103,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Dashboard Merge Requests' do
       create(:merge_request,
               source_branch: 'fix',
               source_project: project,
-              author: create(:user))
+              author: author_user)
     end
 
     before do
@@ -111,6 +120,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Dashboard Merge Requests' do
       expect(page).not_to have_content(labeled_merge_request.title)
     end
 
+    it 'does not show review requested merge requests' do
+      expect(page).not_to have_content(review_requested_merge_request.title)
+    end
+
     it 'shows authored merge requests', :js do
       reset_filters
       input_filtered_search("author:=#{current_user.to_reference}")
diff --git a/spec/features/expand_collapse_diffs_spec.rb b/spec/features/expand_collapse_diffs_spec.rb
index 0912df22924..55bdf4c244e 100644
--- a/spec/features/expand_collapse_diffs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/expand_collapse_diffs_spec.rb
@@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Expand and collapse diffs', :js do
     stub_feature_flags(increased_diff_limits: false)
     allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:diff_max_patch_bytes).and_return(100.kilobytes)
 
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    admin = create(:admin)
+    sign_in(admin)
+    gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
     # Ensure that undiffable.md is in .gitattributes
     project.repository.copy_gitattributes(branch)
diff --git a/spec/features/file_uploads/git_lfs_spec.rb b/spec/features/file_uploads/git_lfs_spec.rb
index b902d7ab702..3824c04ada5 100644
--- a/spec/features/file_uploads/git_lfs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/file_uploads/git_lfs_spec.rb
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Upload a git lfs object', :js do
   include_context 'file upload requests helpers'
 
   let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
-  let_it_be(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
+  let_it_be(:user) { project.owner }
   let_it_be(:personal_access_token) { create(:personal_access_token, user: user) }
 
   let(:file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/banana_sample.gif') }
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/show_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/show_spec.rb
index 97732374eb9..3a42fd508b4 100644
--- a/spec/features/groups/show_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/groups/show_spec.rb
@@ -193,4 +193,69 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group show page' do
 
     it_behaves_like 'page meta description', 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet'
   end
+
+  context 'structured schema markup' do
+    let_it_be(:group) { create(:group, :public, :with_avatar, description: 'foo') }
+    let_it_be(:subgroup) { create(:group, :public, :with_avatar, parent: group, description: 'bar') }
+    let_it_be_with_reload(:project) { create(:project, :public, :with_avatar, namespace: group, description: 'foo') }
+    let_it_be(:subproject) { create(:project, :public, :with_avatar, namespace: subgroup, description: 'bar') }
+
+    it 'shows Organization structured markup', :js do
+      visit path
+      wait_for_all_requests
+
+      aggregate_failures do
+        expect(page).to have_selector('.content[itemscope][itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization"]')
+
+        page.within('.group-home-panel') do
+          expect(page).to have_selector('img.avatar[itemprop="logo"]')
+          expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="name"]', text: group.name)
+          expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="description"]', text: group.description)
+        end
+
+        page.within('[itemprop="owns"][itemtype="https://schema.org/SoftwareSourceCode"]') do
+          expect(page).to have_selector('img.avatar[itemprop="image"]')
+          expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="name"]', text: project.name)
+          expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="description"]', text: project.description)
+        end
+
+        # Finding the subgroup row and expanding it
+        el = find('[itemprop="subOrganization"][itemtype="https://schema.org/Organization"]')
+        el.click
+        wait_for_all_requests
+        page.within(el) do
+          expect(page).to have_selector('img.avatar[itemprop="logo"]')
+          expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="name"]', text: subgroup.name)
+          expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="description"]', text: subgroup.description)
+
+          page.within('[itemprop="owns"][itemtype="https://schema.org/SoftwareSourceCode"]') do
+            expect(page).to have_selector('img.avatar[itemprop="image"]')
+            expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="name"]', text: subproject.name)
+            expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="description"]', text: subproject.description)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'does not include structured markup in shared projects tab', :js do
+      other_project = create(:project, :public)
+      other_project.project_group_links.create!(group: group)
+
+      visit group_shared_path(group)
+      wait_for_all_requests
+
+      expect(page).to have_selector('li.group-row')
+      expect(page).not_to have_selector('[itemprop="owns"][itemtype="https://schema.org/SoftwareSourceCode"]')
+    end
+
+    it 'does not include structured markup in archived projects tab', :js do
+      project.update!(archived: true)
+
+      visit group_archived_path(group)
+      wait_for_all_requests
+
+      expect(page).to have_selector('li.group-row')
+      expect(page).not_to have_selector('[itemprop="owns"][itemtype="https://schema.org/SoftwareSourceCode"]')
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/groups_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups_spec.rb
index b9fd3a1a5cc..0dfa177fcf8 100644
--- a/spec/features/groups_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/groups_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe 'Group' do
-  let(:user) { create(:admin) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
     end
 
     describe 'as a non-admin' do
-      let(:user) { create(:user) }
-
       it 'creates a group and persists visibility radio selection', :js do
         stub_application_setting(default_group_visibility: :private)
 
@@ -140,6 +138,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
     let(:group) { create(:group, path: 'foo') }
 
     context 'as admin' do
+      let(:user) { create(:admin) }
+
       before do
         visit new_group_path(group, parent_id: group.id)
       end
@@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
     let(:new_name) { 'new-name' }
 
     before do
+      group.add_owner(user)
+
       visit path
     end
 
@@ -200,6 +202,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
 
     it 'saves new settings' do
       page.within('.gs-general') do
+        # Have to reset it to '' so it overwrites rather than appends
+        fill_in('group_name', with: '')
         fill_in 'group_name', with: new_name
         click_button 'Save changes'
       end
@@ -229,6 +233,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
     let(:group) { create(:group) }
     let(:path)  { group_path(group) }
 
+    before do
+      group.add_owner(user)
+    end
+
     it 'parses Markdown' do
       group.update_attribute(:description, 'This is **my** group')
 
@@ -267,6 +275,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
     let!(:nested_group) { create(:group, parent: group) }
     let!(:project) { create(:project, namespace: group) }
 
+    before do
+      group.add_owner(user)
+    end
+
     it 'renders projects and groups on the page' do
       visit group_path(group)
       wait_for_requests
@@ -294,6 +306,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Group' do
   describe 'new subgroup / project button' do
     let(:group) { create(:group, project_creation_level: Gitlab::Access::NO_ONE_PROJECT_ACCESS, subgroup_creation_level: Gitlab::Access::OWNER_SUBGROUP_ACCESS) }
 
+    before do
+      group.add_owner(user)
+    end
+
     context 'when user has subgroup creation permissions but not project creation permissions' do
       it 'only displays "New subgroup" button' do
         visit group_path(group)
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/create_issue_for_single_discussion_in_merge_request_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/create_issue_for_single_discussion_in_merge_request_spec.rb
index b449939a70c..841727d6120 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/create_issue_for_single_discussion_in_merge_request_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/create_issue_for_single_discussion_in_merge_request_spec.rb
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Resolve an open thread in a merge request by creating an issue',
         visit project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request)
       end
 
-      it 'does not show a link to create a new issue' do
+      # https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/285453
+      xit 'does not show a link to create a new issue' do
         expect(page).not_to have_css resolve_discussion_selector
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb
index ab40f124257..502412bab5d 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/keyboard_shortcut_spec.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Issues shortcut', :js do
       let(:project) { create(:project) }
 
       before do
-        sign_in(create(:admin))
+        sign_in(project.owner)
 
         visit project_path(project)
       end
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Issues shortcut', :js do
       let(:project) { create(:project, :issues_disabled) }
 
       before do
-        sign_in(create(:admin))
+        sign_in(project.owner)
 
         visit project_path(project)
       end
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/user_edits_issue_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/user_edits_issue_spec.rb
index 11b905735de..9d4a6cdb522 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/user_edits_issue_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/user_edits_issue_spec.rb
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ RSpec.describe "Issues > User edits issue", :js do
 
     context "from edit page" do
       before do
+        stub_licensed_features(multiple_issue_assignees: false)
         visit edit_project_issue_path(project, issue)
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/markdown/copy_as_gfm_spec.rb b/spec/features/markdown/copy_as_gfm_spec.rb
index fbf4e531db1..c9dc764f93b 100644
--- a/spec/features/markdown/copy_as_gfm_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/markdown/copy_as_gfm_spec.rb
@@ -7,10 +7,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Copy as GFM', :js do
   include RepoHelpers
   include ActionView::Helpers::JavaScriptHelper
 
-  before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
-  end
-
   describe 'Copying rendered GFM' do
     before do
       @feat = MarkdownFeature.new
@@ -18,6 +14,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Copy as GFM', :js do
       # `markdown` helper expects a `@project` variable
       @project = @feat.project
 
+      user = create(:user)
+      @project.add_maintainer(user)
+      sign_in(user)
       visit project_issue_path(@project, @feat.issue)
     end
 
@@ -650,6 +649,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Copy as GFM', :js do
   describe 'Copying code' do
     let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
 
+    before do
+      sign_in(project.owner)
+    end
+
     context 'from a diff' do
       shared_examples 'copying code from a diff' do
         context 'selecting one word of text' do
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb
index c452408cff2..2cb2ee7f6f2 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do
         add_comment('-13', '+15')
       end
 
-      it 'allows comments on previously hidden lines at the top of a file' do
+      it 'allows comments on previously hidden lines at the top of a file', quarantine: 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/285294' do
         # Click -9, expand up, select 1 add and verify comment
         page.within('[data-path="files/ruby/popen.rb"]') do
           all('.js-unfold-all')[0].click
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb
index 06405232462..1b1152897fc 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb
@@ -8,11 +8,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Merge request > User resolves conflicts', :js do
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:user) { project.creator }
 
-  before do
-    # In order to have the diffs collapsed, we need to disable the increase feature
-    stub_feature_flags(gitlab_git_diff_size_limit_increase: false)
-  end
-
   def create_merge_request(source_branch)
     create(:merge_request, source_branch: source_branch, target_branch: 'conflict-start', source_project: project, merge_status: :unchecked) do |mr|
       mr.mark_as_unmergeable
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_check_out_branch_modal_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_check_out_branch_modal_spec.rb
index e47f9ff2660..38546fd629d 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_check_out_branch_modal_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_check_out_branch_modal_spec.rb
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Merge request > User sees check out branch modal', :js do
     expect(page).to have_content('Check out, review, and merge locally')
   end
 
-  it 'closes the check out branch modal with escape keypress' do
-    find('#modal_merge_info').send_keys(:escape)
+  it 'closes the check out branch modal with the close action' do
+    find('.modal button[aria-label="Close"]').click
 
     expect(page).not_to have_content('Check out, review, and merge locally')
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_request_pipelines_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_request_pipelines_spec.rb
index 7b319f6aff8..6647a4e9291 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_request_pipelines_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_request_pipelines_spec.rb
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Merge request > User sees pipelines triggered by merge request',
 
   before do
     stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: false)
-    stub_feature_flags(ci_merge_request_pipeline: true)
     stub_ci_pipeline_yaml_file(YAML.dump(config))
     project.add_maintainer(user)
     sign_in(user)
diff --git a/spec/features/profiles/account_spec.rb b/spec/features/profiles/account_spec.rb
index 62d8a96c1b2..2e8d9ef80cd 100644
--- a/spec/features/profiles/account_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/profiles/account_spec.rb
@@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ RSpec.describe 'Profile > Account', :js do
         update_username(new_username)
         visit new_project_path
         expect(current_path).to eq(new_project_path)
-        expect(find('.breadcrumbs-sub-title')).to have_content('Details')
+        expect(find('.breadcrumbs')).to have_content(user.name)
       end
 
       it 'the old project path redirects to the new path' do
         update_username(new_username)
         visit old_project_path
         expect(current_path).to eq(new_project_path)
-        expect(find('.breadcrumbs-sub-title')).to have_content('Details')
+        expect(find('.breadcrumbs')).to have_content(user.name)
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/profiles/active_sessions_spec.rb b/spec/features/profiles/active_sessions_spec.rb
index 75531d43df2..ff969a7786d 100644
--- a/spec/features/profiles/active_sessions_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/profiles/active_sessions_spec.rb
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Profile > Active Sessions', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
         )
 
         gitlab_sign_in(admin)
+        gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
 
         visit admin_user_path(user)
 
@@ -55,8 +56,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Profile > Active Sessions', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
         visit profile_active_sessions_path
 
         expect(page).to(
-          have_selector('ul.list-group li.list-group-item', { text: 'Signed in on',
-                                                              count: 2 }))
+          have_selector('ul.list-group li.list-group-item', text: 'Signed in on',
+                                                              count: 2))
 
         expect(page).to have_content(
           '127.0.0.1 ' \
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/blobs/balsamiq_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/blobs/balsamiq_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bce60856544
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/projects/blobs/balsamiq_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe 'Balsamiq file blob', :js do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
+
+  before do
+    visit project_blob_path(project, 'add-balsamiq-file/files/images/balsamiq.bmpr')
+
+    wait_for_requests
+  end
+
+  it 'displays Balsamiq file content' do
+    expect(page).to have_content("Mobile examples")
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_creates_new_blob_in_new_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_creates_new_blob_in_new_project_spec.rb
index 6b9fd41059d..484f740faee 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_creates_new_blob_in_new_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_creates_new_blob_in_new_project_spec.rb
@@ -9,12 +9,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'User creates new blob', :js do
   let(:project) { create(:project, :empty_repo) }
 
   shared_examples 'creating a file' do
-    before do
-      sign_in(user)
+    it 'allows the user to add a new file in Web IDE' do
       visit project_path(project)
-    end
 
-    it 'allows the user to add a new file in Web IDE' do
       click_link 'New file'
 
       wait_for_requests
@@ -31,6 +28,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'User creates new blob', :js do
   describe 'as a maintainer' do
     before do
       project.add_maintainer(user)
+      sign_in(user)
     end
 
     it_behaves_like 'creating a file'
@@ -39,6 +37,11 @@ RSpec.describe 'User creates new blob', :js do
   describe 'as an admin' do
     let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
 
+    before do
+      sign_in(user)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(user)
+    end
+
     it_behaves_like 'creating a file'
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_follows_pipeline_suggest_nudge_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_follows_pipeline_suggest_nudge_spec.rb
index 3069405ba63..1c79b2ddc38 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_follows_pipeline_suggest_nudge_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/blobs/user_follows_pipeline_suggest_nudge_spec.rb
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 RSpec.describe 'User follows pipeline suggest nudge spec when feature is enabled', :js do
   include CookieHelper
 
-  let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :empty_repo) }
+  let(:user) { project.owner }
 
   describe 'viewing the new blob page' do
     before do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb
index a0519d88532..d34dde6a8f2 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'Gcp Cluster', :js, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
+RSpec.describe 'Gcp Cluster', :js do
   include GoogleApi::CloudPlatformHelpers
 
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/diffs/diff_show_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/diffs/diff_show_spec.rb
index 19f111a727b..747277e2562 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/diffs/diff_show_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/diffs/diff_show_spec.rb
@@ -155,10 +155,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'Diff file viewer', :js do
 
   context 'binary file that appears to be text in the first 1024 bytes' do
     before do
-      # The file we're visiting is smaller than 10 KB and we want it collapsed
-      # so we need to disable the size increase feature.
-      stub_feature_flags(gitlab_git_diff_size_limit_increase: false)
-
       visit_commit('7b1cf4336b528e0f3d1d140ee50cafdbc703597c')
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/environments/environments_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/environments/environments_spec.rb
index 8c032660726..a265e0c28fc 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/environments/environments_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/environments/environments_spec.rb
@@ -12,8 +12,16 @@ RSpec.describe 'Environments page', :js do
     sign_in(user)
   end
 
+  def actions_button_selector
+    '[data-testid="environment-actions-button"]'
+  end
+
+  def action_link_selector
+    '[data-testid="manual-action-link"]'
+  end
+
   def stop_button_selector
-    %q{button[title="Stop environment"]}
+    'button[title="Stop environment"]'
   end
 
   describe 'page tabs' do
@@ -187,18 +195,17 @@ RSpec.describe 'Environments page', :js do
         end
 
         it 'shows a play button' do
-          find('.js-environment-actions-dropdown').click
-
+          find(actions_button_selector).click
           expect(page).to have_content(action.name)
         end
 
         it 'allows to play a manual action', :js do
           expect(action).to be_manual
 
-          find('.js-environment-actions-dropdown').click
+          find(actions_button_selector).click
           expect(page).to have_content(action.name)
 
-          expect { find('.js-manual-action-link').click }
+          expect { find(action_link_selector).click }
             .not_to change { Ci::Pipeline.count }
         end
 
@@ -301,11 +308,11 @@ RSpec.describe 'Environments page', :js do
         end
 
         it 'has a dropdown for actionable jobs' do
-          expect(page).to have_selector('.dropdown-new.btn.btn-default [data-testid="play-icon"]')
+          expect(page).to have_selector("#{actions_button_selector} [data-testid=\"play-icon\"]")
         end
 
         it "has link to the delayed job's action" do
-          find('.js-environment-actions-dropdown').click
+          find(actions_button_selector).click
 
           expect(page).to have_button('delayed job')
           expect(page).to have_content(/\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}/)
@@ -320,7 +327,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Environments page', :js do
           end
 
           it "shows 00:00:00 as the remaining time" do
-            find('.js-environment-actions-dropdown').click
+            find(actions_button_selector).click
 
             expect(page).to have_content("00:00:00")
           end
@@ -328,8 +335,8 @@ RSpec.describe 'Environments page', :js do
 
         context 'when user played a delayed job immediately' do
           before do
-            find('.js-environment-actions-dropdown').click
-            page.accept_confirm { click_button('delayed job') }
+            find(actions_button_selector).click
+            accept_confirm { find(action_link_selector).click }
             wait_for_requests
           end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/features_visibility_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/features_visibility_spec.rb
index 467adb25a17..904b4bda0e0 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/features_visibility_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/features_visibility_spec.rb
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Edit Project Settings' do
       before do
         non_member.update_attribute(:admin, true)
         sign_in(non_member)
+        gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(non_member)
       end
 
       it 'renders 404 if feature is disabled' do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/gfm_autocomplete_load_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/gfm_autocomplete_load_spec.rb
index b02483be489..f4cd65bcba1 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/gfm_autocomplete_load_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/gfm_autocomplete_load_spec.rb
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'GFM autocomplete loading', :js do
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
 
   before do
-    sign_in(create(:admin))
+    sign_in(project.owner)
 
     visit project_path(project)
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb
index 83ceffa621c..af228764c17 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb
@@ -28,73 +28,40 @@ RSpec.describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
     let(:project_name) { 'Test Project Name' + randomHex }
     let(:project_path) { 'test-project-name' + randomHex }
 
-    context 'prefilled the path' do
-      it 'user imports an exported project successfully', :sidekiq_might_not_need_inline do
-        visit new_project_path
+    it 'user imports an exported project successfully', :sidekiq_might_not_need_inline do
+      visit new_project_path
+      click_import_project_tab
+      click_link 'GitLab export'
 
-        fill_in :project_name, with: project_name, visible: true
-        click_import_project_tab
-        click_link 'GitLab export'
+      fill_in :name, with: 'Test Project Name', visible: true
+      fill_in :path, with: 'test-project-path', visible: true
+      attach_file('file', file)
 
-        expect(page).to have_content('Import an exported GitLab project')
-        expect(URI.parse(current_url).query).to eq("namespace_id=#{namespace.id}&name=#{ERB::Util.url_encode(project_name)}&path=#{project_path}")
+      expect { click_on 'Import project' }.to change { Project.count }.by(1)
 
-        attach_file('file', file)
-        click_on 'Import project'
-
-        expect(Project.count).to eq(1)
-
-        project = Project.last
-        expect(project).not_to be_nil
-        expect(project.description).to eq("Foo Bar")
-        expect(project.issues).not_to be_empty
-        expect(project.merge_requests).not_to be_empty
-        expect(wiki_exists?(project)).to be true
-        expect(project.import_state.status).to eq('finished')
-      end
+      project = Project.last
+      expect(project).not_to be_nil
+      expect(page).to have_content("Project 'test-project-path' is being imported")
     end
 
-    context 'path is not prefilled' do
-      it 'user imports an exported project successfully', :sidekiq_might_not_need_inline do
-        visit new_project_path
-        click_import_project_tab
-        click_link 'GitLab export'
+    it 'invalid project' do
+      project = create(:project, namespace: user.namespace)
 
-        fill_in :name, with: 'Test Project Name', visible: true
-        fill_in :path, with: 'test-project-path', visible: true
-        attach_file('file', file)
+      visit new_project_path
 
-        expect { click_on 'Import project' }.to change { Project.count }.by(1)
+      click_import_project_tab
+      click_link 'GitLab export'
+      fill_in :name, with: project.name, visible: true
+      attach_file('file', file)
+      click_on 'Import project'
 
-        project = Project.last
-        expect(project).not_to be_nil
-        expect(page).to have_content("Project 'test-project-path' is being imported")
+      page.within('.flash-container') do
+        expect(page).to have_content('Project could not be imported')
       end
     end
   end
 
-  it 'invalid project' do
-    project = create(:project, namespace: user.namespace)
-
-    visit new_project_path
-
-    fill_in :project_name, with: project.name, visible: true
-    click_import_project_tab
-    click_link 'GitLab export'
-    attach_file('file', file)
-    click_on 'Import project'
-
-    page.within('.flash-container') do
-      expect(page).to have_content('Project could not be imported')
-    end
-  end
-
-  def wiki_exists?(project)
-    wiki = ProjectWiki.new(project)
-    wiki.repository.exists? && !wiki.repository.empty?
-  end
-
   def click_import_project_tab
-    find('#import-project-tab').click
+    find('[data-qa-selector="import_project_link"]').click
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb
index 6a2ec9aa4a8..796fd76cfdf 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe 'New project' do
+RSpec.describe 'New project', :js do
   include Select2Helper
 
   context 'as a user' do
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
       )
 
       visit new_project_path
+      find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
       expect(page).to have_content 'Other visibility settings have been disabled by the administrator.'
     end
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
       )
 
       visit new_project_path
+      find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
       expect(page).to have_content 'Visibility settings have been disabled by the administrator.'
     end
@@ -42,12 +44,14 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
 
     it 'shows "New project" page', :js do
       visit new_project_path
+      find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
       expect(page).to have_content('Project name')
       expect(page).to have_content('Project URL')
       expect(page).to have_content('Project slug')
 
-      find('#import-project-tab').click
+      click_link('New project')
+      find('[data-qa-selector="import_project_link"]').click
 
       expect(page).to have_link('GitHub')
       expect(page).to have_link('Bitbucket')
@@ -61,7 +65,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
       before do
         visit new_project_path
 
-        find('#import-project-tab').click
+        find('[data-qa-selector="import_project_link"]').click
       end
 
       it { expect(page).to have_link('Manifest file') }
@@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
           stub_application_setting(default_project_visibility: level)
 
           visit new_project_path
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
             expect(find_field("project_visibility_level_#{level}")).to be_checked
           end
@@ -80,6 +85,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
 
         it "saves visibility level #{level} on validation error" do
           visit new_project_path
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
           choose(s_(key))
           click_button('Create project')
@@ -97,6 +103,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
         it 'has private selected' do
           group = create(:group, visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE)
           visit new_project_path(namespace_id: group.id)
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
             expect(find_field("project_visibility_level_#{Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE}")).to be_checked
@@ -112,6 +119,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
         it 'has private selected' do
           group = create(:group, visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PUBLIC)
           visit new_project_path(namespace_id: group.id, project: { visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE })
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
             expect(find_field("project_visibility_level_#{Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE}")).to be_checked
@@ -123,6 +131,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
     context 'Readme selector' do
       it 'shows the initialize with Readme checkbox on "Blank project" tab' do
         visit new_project_path
+        find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
 
         expect(page).to have_css('input#project_initialize_with_readme')
         expect(page).to have_content('Initialize repository with a README')
@@ -130,7 +139,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
 
       it 'does not show the initialize with Readme checkbox on "Create from template" tab' do
         visit new_project_path
-        find('#create-from-template-pane').click
+        find('[data-qa-selector="create_from_template_link"]').click
         first('.choose-template').click
 
         page.within '.project-fields-form' do
@@ -141,7 +150,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
 
       it 'does not show the initialize with Readme checkbox on "Import project" tab' do
         visit new_project_path
-        find('#import-project-tab').click
+        find('[data-qa-selector="import_project_link"]').click
         first('.js-import-git-toggle-button').click
 
         page.within '.toggle-import-form' do
@@ -155,13 +164,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
       context 'with user namespace' do
         before do
           visit new_project_path
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
         end
 
         it 'selects the user namespace' do
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
-            namespace = find('#project_namespace_id')
-
-            expect(namespace.text).to eq user.username
+            expect(page).to have_select('project[namespace_id]', visible: false, selected: user.username)
           end
         end
       end
@@ -172,13 +180,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
         before do
           group.add_owner(user)
           visit new_project_path(namespace_id: group.id)
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
         end
 
         it 'selects the group namespace' do
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
-            namespace = find('#project_namespace_id option[selected]')
-
-            expect(namespace.text).to eq group.name
+            expect(page).to have_select('project[namespace_id]', visible: false, selected: group.name)
           end
         end
       end
@@ -190,13 +197,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
         before do
           group.add_maintainer(user)
           visit new_project_path(namespace_id: subgroup.id)
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
         end
 
         it 'selects the group namespace' do
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
-            namespace = find('#project_namespace_id option[selected]')
-
-            expect(namespace.text).to eq subgroup.full_path
+            expect(page).to have_select('project[namespace_id]', visible: false, selected: subgroup.full_path)
           end
         end
       end
@@ -211,6 +217,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
           internal_group.add_owner(user)
           private_group.add_owner(user)
           visit new_project_path(namespace_id: public_group.id)
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
         end
 
         it 'enables the correct visibility options' do
@@ -240,7 +247,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
     context 'Import project options', :js do
       before do
         visit new_project_path
-        find('#import-project-tab').click
+        find('[data-qa-selector="import_project_link"]').click
       end
 
       context 'from git repository url, "Repo by URL"' do
@@ -315,13 +322,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'New project' do
         before do
           group.add_developer(user)
           visit new_project_path(namespace_id: group.id)
+          find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
         end
 
         it 'selects the group namespace' do
           page.within('#blank-project-pane') do
-            namespace = find('#project_namespace_id option[selected]')
-
-            expect(namespace.text).to eq group.full_path
+            expect(page).to have_select('project[namespace_id]', visible: false, selected: group.full_path)
           end
         end
       end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/repository_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/repository_settings_spec.rb
index 8c7b7bc70a2..3e520142117 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/repository_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/repository_settings_spec.rb
@@ -289,13 +289,13 @@ RSpec.describe 'Projects > Settings > Repository settings' do
       visit project_settings_repository_path(project)
     end
 
-    context 'when project mirroring is enabled' do
+    context 'when project mirroring is enabled', :enable_admin_mode do
       let(:mirror_available) { true }
 
       include_examples 'shows mirror settings'
     end
 
-    context 'when project mirroring is disabled' do
+    context 'when project mirroring is disabled', :enable_admin_mode do
       let(:mirror_available) { false }
 
       include_examples 'shows mirror settings'
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/show/no_password_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/show/no_password_spec.rb
index 79cd65e5406..d18ff75b324 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/show/no_password_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/show/no_password_spec.rb
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'No Password Alert' do
       let(:user) { create(:user) }
 
       it 'shows no alert' do
-        expect(page).not_to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push project code via HTTP until you set a password on your account"
+        expect(page).not_to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push repositories via HTTP until you set a password on your account"
       end
     end
 
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'No Password Alert' do
       let(:user) { create(:user, password_automatically_set: true) }
 
       it 'shows a password alert' do
-        expect(page).to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push project code via HTTP until you set a password on your account"
+        expect(page).to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push repositories via HTTP until you set a password on your account"
       end
     end
   end
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'No Password Alert' do
         gitlab_sign_in_via('saml', user, 'my-uid')
         visit project_path(project)
 
-        expect(page).to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push project code via HTTP until you create a personal access token on your account"
+        expect(page).to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push repositories via HTTP until you create a personal access token on your account"
       end
     end
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'No Password Alert' do
         gitlab_sign_in_via('saml', user, 'my-uid')
         visit project_path(project)
 
-        expect(page).not_to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push project code via HTTP until you create a personal access token on your account"
+        expect(page).not_to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push repositories via HTTP until you create a personal access token on your account"
       end
     end
   end
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'No Password Alert' do
     end
 
     it 'shows no alert' do
-      expect(page).not_to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push project code via HTTP until you"
+      expect(page).not_to have_content "You won't be able to pull or push repositories via HTTP until you"
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/show/schema_markup_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/show/schema_markup_spec.rb
index e651798af23..1777b72cbf5 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/show/schema_markup_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/show/schema_markup_spec.rb
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Projects > Show > Schema Markup' do
       expect(page).to have_selector('img[itemprop="image"]')
       expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="name"]', text: project.name)
       expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="identifier"]', text: "Project ID: #{project.id}")
-      expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="abstract"]', text: project.description)
+      expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="description"]', text: project.description)
       expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="license"]', text: project.repository.license.name)
       expect(find_all('[itemprop="keywords"]').map(&:text)).to match_array(project.tag_list.map(&:capitalize))
       expect(page).to have_selector('[itemprop="about"]')
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb
index b204ae76e07..feb5f348256 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'User creates a project', :js do
   it 'creates a new project' do
     visit(new_project_path)
 
+    find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
     fill_in(:project_name, with: 'Empty')
 
     page.within('#content-body') do
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'User creates a project', :js do
     it 'creates a new project' do
       visit(new_project_path)
 
+      find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
       fill_in :project_name, with: 'A Subgroup Project'
       fill_in :project_path, with: 'a-subgroup-project'
 
@@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'User creates a project', :js do
     it 'creates a new project' do
       visit(new_project_path)
 
+      find('[data-qa-selector="blank_project_link"]').click
       fill_in :project_name, with: 'a-new-project'
       fill_in :project_path, with: 'a-new-project'
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/user_sorts_projects_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/user_sorts_projects_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6a5ed49f1a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/projects/user_sorts_projects_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe 'User sorts projects and order persists' do
+  include CookieHelper
+
+  let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let_it_be(:group) { create(:group) }
+  let_it_be(:group_member) { create(:group_member, :maintainer, user: user, group: group) }
+  let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :public, group: group) }
+
+  shared_examples_for "sort order persists across all views" do |project_paths_label, group_paths_label|
+    it "is set on the dashboard_projects_path" do
+      visit(dashboard_projects_path)
+
+      expect(find('.dropdown-menu a.is-active', text: project_paths_label)).to have_content(project_paths_label)
+    end
+
+    it "is set on the explore_projects_path" do
+      visit(explore_projects_path)
+
+      expect(find('.dropdown-menu a.is-active', text: project_paths_label)).to have_content(project_paths_label)
+    end
+
+    it "is set on the group_canonical_path" do
+      visit(group_canonical_path(group))
+
+      expect(find('.dropdown-menu a.is-active', text: group_paths_label)).to have_content(group_paths_label)
+    end
+
+    it "is set on the details_group_path" do
+      visit(details_group_path(group))
+
+      expect(find('.dropdown-menu a.is-active', text: group_paths_label)).to have_content(group_paths_label)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context "from explore projects" do
+    before do
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit(explore_projects_path)
+      find('#sort-projects-dropdown').click
+      first(:link, 'Last updated').click
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like "sort order persists across all views", "Last updated", "Last updated"
+  end
+
+  context 'from dashboard projects' do
+    before do
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit(dashboard_projects_path)
+      find('#sort-projects-dropdown').click
+      first(:link, 'Name').click
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like "sort order persists across all views", "Name", "Name"
+  end
+
+  context 'from group homepage' do
+    before do
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit(group_canonical_path(group))
+      find('button.dropdown-menu-toggle').click
+      first(:link, 'Last created').click
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like "sort order persists across all views", "Created date", "Last created"
+  end
+
+  context 'from group details' do
+    before do
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit(details_group_path(group))
+      find('button.dropdown-menu-toggle').click
+      first(:link, 'Most stars').click
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like "sort order persists across all views", "Stars", "Most stars"
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/user_views_empty_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/user_views_empty_project_spec.rb
index 9202d18b86f..3d4d9a7ea96 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/user_views_empty_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/user_views_empty_project_spec.rb
@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'User views an empty project' do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
 
   shared_examples 'allowing push to default branch' do
-    before do
-      sign_in(user)
+    it 'shows push-to-master instructions' do
       visit project_path(project)
-    end
 
-    it 'shows push-to-master instructions' do
       expect(page).to have_content('git push -u origin master')
     end
   end
@@ -20,6 +17,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'User views an empty project' do
   describe 'as a maintainer' do
     before do
       project.add_maintainer(user)
+      sign_in(user)
     end
 
     it_behaves_like 'allowing push to default branch'
@@ -28,17 +26,33 @@ RSpec.describe 'User views an empty project' do
   describe 'as an admin' do
     let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
 
-    it_behaves_like 'allowing push to default branch'
+    context 'when admin mode is enabled' do
+      before do
+        sign_in(user)
+        gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(user)
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'allowing push to default branch'
+    end
+
+    context 'when admin mode is disabled' do
+      it 'does not show push-to-master instructions' do
+        visit project_path(project)
+
+        expect(page).not_to have_content('git push -u origin master')
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe 'as a developer' do
     before do
       project.add_developer(user)
       sign_in(user)
-      visit project_path(project)
     end
 
     it 'does not show push-to-master instructions' do
+      visit project_path(project)
+
       expect(page).not_to have_content('git push -u origin master')
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_git_access_wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_git_access_wiki_page_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 83679c6bd1d..00000000000
--- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_git_access_wiki_page_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-RSpec.describe 'Projects > Wiki > User views Git access wiki page' do
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo, :public) }
-  let(:wiki_page) { create(:wiki_page, wiki: project.wiki, title: 'home', content: '[some link](other-page)') }
-
-  before do
-    sign_in(user)
-  end
-
-  it 'Visit Wiki Page Current Commit' do
-    visit project_wiki_path(project, wiki_page)
-
-    click_link 'Clone repository'
-    expect(page).to have_text("Clone repository #{project.wiki.full_path}")
-    expect(page).to have_text(project.wiki.http_url_to_repo)
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wikis_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wikis_spec.rb
index 1c66ad81145..621f8c71b20 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/wikis_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/wikis_spec.rb
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ RSpec.describe 'Project wikis' do
   it_behaves_like 'User views a wiki page'
   it_behaves_like 'User views wiki pages'
   it_behaves_like 'User views wiki sidebar'
+  it_behaves_like 'User views Git access wiki page'
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects_spec.rb
index 9b5f4ca6d48..e67fb9c2bd6 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects_spec.rb
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Project' do
 
     shared_examples 'creates from template' do |template, sub_template_tab = nil|
       it "is created from template", :js do
-        find('#create-from-template-tab').click
+        find('[data-qa-selector="create_from_template_link"]').click
         find(".project-template #{sub_template_tab}").click if sub_template_tab
         find("label[for=#{template.name}]").click
         fill_in("project_name", with: template.name)
@@ -47,9 +47,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Project' do
     end
 
     it 'shows the command in a popover', :js do
-      page.within '.profile-settings-sidebar' do
-        click_link 'Show command'
-      end
+      click_link 'Show command'
 
       expect(page).to have_css('.popover .push-to-create-popover #push_to_create_tip')
       expect(page).to have_content 'Private projects can be created in your personal namespace with:'
@@ -61,7 +59,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Project' do
     let(:path)    { project_path(project) }
 
     before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      sign_in(project.owner)
     end
 
     it 'parses Markdown' do
@@ -125,7 +123,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Project' do
     let(:path)    { project_path(project) }
 
     before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      sign_in(project.owner)
       visit path
     end
 
@@ -156,7 +154,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Project' do
     let(:path)    { project_path(project) }
 
     before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      sign_in(project.owner)
       visit path
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/protected_branches_spec.rb b/spec/features/protected_branches_spec.rb
index 3be01595502..95d268ab1be 100644
--- a/spec/features/protected_branches_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/protected_branches_spec.rb
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Protected Branches', :js do
   context 'logged in as admin' do
     before do
       sign_in(admin)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(admin)
     end
 
     describe "explicit protected branches" do
diff --git a/spec/features/protected_tags_spec.rb b/spec/features/protected_tags_spec.rb
index 12e4bbde293..25447db3c8d 100644
--- a/spec/features/protected_tags_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/protected_tags_spec.rb
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 RSpec.describe 'Protected Tags', :js do
   include ProtectedTagHelpers
 
-  let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:user) { project.owner }
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
diff --git a/spec/features/registrations/experience_level_spec.rb b/spec/features/registrations/experience_level_spec.rb
index 06d380926cd..30f19870f69 100644
--- a/spec/features/registrations/experience_level_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/registrations/experience_level_spec.rb
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ RSpec.describe 'Experience level screen' do
 
   it 'shows the option for novice' do
     is_expected.to have_content('Novice')
-    is_expected.to have_content('I’m not very familiar with the basics of project management and DevOps')
-    is_expected.to have_content('Show me everything')
+    is_expected.to have_content('I’m not familiar with the basics of DevOps')
+    is_expected.to have_content('Show me the basics')
   end
 
   it 'shows the option for experienced' do
     is_expected.to have_content('Experienced')
-    is_expected.to have_content('I’m familiar with the basics of project management and DevOps')
-    is_expected.to have_content('Show me more advanced stuff')
+    is_expected.to have_content('I’m familiar with the basics of DevOps')
+    is_expected.to have_content('Show me advanced features')
   end
 
   it 'does not display any flash messages' do
diff --git a/spec/features/security/admin_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/admin_access_spec.rb
index 38f00f399f3..8070ae066e7 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/admin_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/admin_access_spec.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,14 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Projects" do
   describe "GET /admin/projects" do
     subject { admin_projects_path }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for :admin }
+    context 'when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode do
+      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for :admin }
+    end
+
+    context 'when admin mode is disabled' do
+      it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :admin }
+    end
+
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :user }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :visitor }
   end
@@ -16,7 +23,14 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Projects" do
   describe "GET /admin/users" do
     subject { admin_users_path }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for :admin }
+    context 'when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode do
+      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for :admin }
+    end
+
+    context 'when admin mode is disabled' do
+      it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :admin }
+    end
+
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :user }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :visitor }
   end
@@ -24,7 +38,14 @@ RSpec.describe "Admin::Projects" do
   describe "GET /admin/hooks" do
     subject { admin_hooks_path }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for :admin }
+    context 'when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode do
+      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for :admin }
+    end
+
+    context 'when admin mode is disabled' do
+      it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :admin }
+    end
+
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :user }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for :visitor }
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/security/project/internal_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/project/internal_access_spec.rb
index 051bd601c1d..cb9f9a6e680 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/project/internal_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/project/internal_access_spec.rb
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/ci_cd" do
     subject { project_settings_ci_cd_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -116,7 +117,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/repository" do
     subject { project_settings_repository_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -146,7 +148,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/edit" do
     subject { edit_project_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -160,7 +163,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/deploy_keys" do
     subject { project_deploy_keys_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -190,7 +194,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
 
     subject { edit_project_issue_path(project, issue) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -218,7 +223,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/new" do
     subject { new_project_snippet_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -246,7 +252,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/merge_requests/new" do
     subject { project_new_merge_request_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -302,7 +309,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/integrations" do
     subject { project_settings_integrations_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -367,7 +375,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
         project.update(public_builds: false)
       end
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -406,7 +415,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
         project.update(public_builds: false)
       end
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -445,7 +455,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
         project.update(public_builds: false)
       end
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -460,7 +471,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/pipeline_schedules" do
     subject { project_pipeline_schedules_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -474,7 +486,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments" do
     subject { project_environments_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -490,7 +503,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_environment_path(project, environment) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -506,7 +520,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_environment_deployments_path(project, environment) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -520,7 +535,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments/new" do
     subject { new_project_environment_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/security/project/private_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/project/private_access_spec.rb
index e891e79db70..dda218c5de5 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/project/private_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/project/private_access_spec.rb
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path" do
     subject { project_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -32,7 +33,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/tree/master" do
     subject { project_tree_path(project, project.repository.root_ref) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -46,7 +48,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/commits/master" do
     subject { project_commits_path(project, project.repository.root_ref, limit: 1) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -60,7 +63,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/commit/:sha" do
     subject { project_commit_path(project, project.repository.commit) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -74,7 +78,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/compare" do
     subject { project_compare_index_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -88,7 +93,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/project_members" do
     subject { project_project_members_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -102,7 +108,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/ci_cd" do
     subject { project_settings_ci_cd_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -116,7 +123,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/repository" do
     subject { project_settings_repository_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -132,7 +140,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_blob_path(project, File.join(commit.id, '.gitignore')) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -146,7 +155,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/edit" do
     subject { edit_project_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -160,7 +170,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/deploy_keys" do
     subject { project_deploy_keys_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -174,7 +185,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/issues" do
     subject { project_issues_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -190,7 +202,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { edit_project_issue_path(project, issue) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -204,7 +217,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets" do
     subject { project_snippets_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -218,7 +232,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/merge_requests" do
     subject { project_merge_requests_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -239,7 +254,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
       end
     end
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -260,7 +276,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
       end
     end
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -274,7 +291,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/integrations" do
     subject { project_settings_integrations_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -288,7 +306,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/pipelines" do
     subject { project_pipelines_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -316,7 +335,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_pipeline_path(project, pipeline) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -342,7 +362,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/builds" do
     subject { project_jobs_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -371,7 +392,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_job_path(project, build.id) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -405,7 +427,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { trace_project_job_path(project, build.id) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -435,7 +458,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments" do
     subject { project_environments_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -451,7 +475,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_environment_path(project, environment) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -467,7 +492,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_environment_deployments_path(project, environment) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -481,7 +507,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments/new" do
     subject { new_project_environment_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -495,7 +522,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/pipeline_schedules" do
     subject { project_pipeline_schedules_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -509,7 +537,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/pipeline_schedules/new" do
     subject { new_project_pipeline_schedule_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -523,7 +552,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments/new" do
     subject { new_project_pipeline_schedule_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -545,7 +575,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_container_registry_index_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/security/project/public_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/project/public_access_spec.rb
index 75993959f6e..f2dbab72a48 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/project/public_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/project/public_access_spec.rb
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/ci_cd" do
     subject { project_settings_ci_cd_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -116,7 +117,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/repository" do
     subject { project_settings_repository_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -181,7 +183,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
         project.update(public_builds: false)
       end
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -220,7 +223,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
         project.update(public_builds: false)
       end
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -259,7 +263,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
         project.update(public_builds: false)
       end
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -274,7 +279,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/pipeline_schedules" do
     subject { project_pipeline_schedules_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -288,7 +294,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments" do
     subject { project_environments_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -304,7 +311,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_environment_path(project, environment) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -320,7 +328,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
 
     subject { project_environment_deployments_path(project, environment) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -334,7 +343,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/environments/new" do
     subject { new_project_environment_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -363,7 +373,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/edit" do
     subject { edit_project_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -377,7 +388,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/deploy_keys" do
     subject { project_deploy_keys_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -407,7 +419,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
 
     subject { edit_project_issue_path(project, issue) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -435,7 +448,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/new" do
     subject { new_project_snippet_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -463,7 +477,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/merge_requests/new" do
     subject { project_new_merge_request_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -519,7 +534,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/-/settings/integrations" do
     subject { project_settings_integrations_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:developer).of(project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/security/project/snippet/internal_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/project/snippet/internal_access_spec.rb
index 0667a2fd48a..12237863188 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/project/snippet/internal_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/project/snippet/internal_access_spec.rb
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Snippets Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/new" do
     subject { new_project_snippet_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -55,7 +56,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Snippets Access" do
     context "for a private snippet" do
       subject { project_snippet_path(project, private_snippet) }
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -85,7 +87,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Internal Project Snippets Access" do
     context "for a private snippet" do
       subject { raw_project_snippet_path(project, private_snippet) }
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/security/project/snippet/private_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/project/snippet/private_access_spec.rb
index 0c97b012ad1..0f7ae06a6c5 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/project/snippet/private_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/project/snippet/private_access_spec.rb
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Snippets Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets" do
     subject { project_snippets_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -26,7 +27,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Snippets Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/new" do
     subject { new_project_snippet_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -40,7 +42,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Snippets Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/:id for a private snippet" do
     subject { project_snippet_path(project, private_snippet) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -54,7 +57,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Private Project Snippets Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/:id/raw for a private snippet" do
     subject { raw_project_snippet_path(project, private_snippet) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/security/project/snippet/public_access_spec.rb b/spec/features/security/project/snippet/public_access_spec.rb
index 20a271f9c0e..2ae08205602 100644
--- a/spec/features/security/project/snippet/public_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/security/project/snippet/public_access_spec.rb
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Snippets Access" do
   describe "GET /:project_path/snippets/new" do
     subject { new_project_snippet_path(project) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+    it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
     it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -70,7 +71,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Snippets Access" do
     context "for a private snippet" do
       subject { project_snippet_path(project, private_snippet) }
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
@@ -114,7 +116,8 @@ RSpec.describe "Public Project Snippets Access" do
     context "for a private snippet" do
       subject { raw_project_snippet_path(project, private_snippet) }
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is allowed for admin when admin mode is enabled', :enable_admin_mode) { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:admin) }
+      it('is denied for admin when admin mode is disabled') { is_expected.to be_denied_for(:admin) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:owner).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:maintainer).of(project) }
       it { is_expected.to be_allowed_for(:developer).of(project) }
diff --git a/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb b/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb
index 04bdf25acc0..6fa1d7d76b5 100644
--- a/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Usage stats consent' do
       end
 
       gitlab_sign_in(user)
+      gitlab_enable_admin_mode_sign_in(user)
     end
 
     it 'hides the banner permanently when sets usage stats' do
diff --git a/spec/finders/ci/pipeline_schedules_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/ci/pipeline_schedules_finder_spec.rb
index 57842bbecd7..535c684289e 100644
--- a/spec/finders/ci/pipeline_schedules_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/ci/pipeline_schedules_finder_spec.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::PipelineSchedulesFinder do
   let!(:active_schedule) { create(:ci_pipeline_schedule, project: project) }
   let!(:inactive_schedule) { create(:ci_pipeline_schedule, :inactive, project: project) }
 
-  subject { described_class.new(project).execute(params) }
+  subject { described_class.new(project).execute(**params) }
 
   describe "#execute" do
     context 'when the scope is nil' do
diff --git a/spec/finders/feature_flags_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/feature_flags_finder_spec.rb
index 870447a1286..cab1094672b 100644
--- a/spec/finders/feature_flags_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/feature_flags_finder_spec.rb
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ RSpec.describe FeatureFlagsFinder do
   end
 
   describe '#execute' do
-    subject { finder.execute(args) }
+    subject { finder.execute(**args) }
 
     let!(:feature_flag_1) { create(:operations_feature_flag, name: 'flag-a', project: project) }
     let!(:feature_flag_2) { create(:operations_feature_flag, name: 'flag-b', project: project) }
diff --git a/spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb
index 9e58378b953..2b2e4c0d618 100644
--- a/spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ RSpec.describe ForkProjectsFinder do
   let(:private_fork_member) { create(:user) }
 
   before do
-    stub_feature_flags(object_pools: source_project)
-
     private_fork.update!(visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE)
     private_fork.add_developer(private_fork_member)
 
diff --git a/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb
index 3c3bf1a8870..0def3412aa7 100644
--- a/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb
@@ -472,10 +472,6 @@ RSpec.describe IssuesFinder do
         it 'returns issues with title and description match for search term' do
           expect(issues).to contain_exactly(issue1, issue2)
         end
-
-        it 'uses optimizer hints' do
-          expect(issues.to_sql).to match(/BitmapScan/)
-        end
       end
 
       context 'filtering by issue term in title' do
diff --git a/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb
index 68958e37001..7b59b581b1c 100644
--- a/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb
@@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestsFinder do
       end
 
       context 'assignee filtering' do
+        let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user) }
+
         let(:issuables) { described_class.new(user, params).execute }
 
         it_behaves_like 'assignee ID filter' do
@@ -351,7 +353,6 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestsFinder do
             merge_request3.assignees = [user2, user3]
           end
 
-          let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user) }
           let(:params) { { assignee_username: [user2.username, user3.username] } }
           let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request3] }
         end
@@ -366,38 +367,95 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestsFinder do
         end
 
         it_behaves_like 'no assignee filter' do
-          let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user) }
           let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request4, merge_request5] }
         end
 
         it_behaves_like 'any assignee filter' do
           let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3] }
         end
+      end
 
-        context 'filtering by group milestone' do
-          let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
+      context 'reviewer filtering' do
+        subject { described_class.new(user, params).execute }
 
-          before do
-            merge_request1.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
-            merge_request2.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
-          end
+        context 'by reviewer_id' do
+          let(:params) { { reviewer_id: user2.id } }
+          let(:expected_mr) { [merge_request1, merge_request2] }
 
-          it 'returns merge requests assigned to that group milestone' do
-            params = { milestone_title: group_milestone.title }
+          it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(*expected_mr) }
+        end
 
-            merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+        context 'by NOT reviewer_id' do
+          let(:params) { { not: { reviewer_id: user2.id } } }
+          let(:expected_mr) { [merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5] }
 
-            expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2)
-          end
+          it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(*expected_mr) }
+        end
 
-          context 'using NOT' do
-            let(:params) { { not: { milestone_title: group_milestone.title } } }
+        context 'by reviewer_username' do
+          let(:params) { { reviewer_username: user2.username } }
+          let(:expected_mr) { [merge_request1, merge_request2] }
 
-            it 'returns MRs not assigned to that group milestone' do
-              merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+          it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(*expected_mr) }
+        end
 
-              expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5)
-            end
+        context 'by NOT reviewer_username' do
+          let(:params) { { not: { reviewer_username: user2.username } } }
+          let(:expected_mr) { [merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5] }
+
+          it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(*expected_mr) }
+        end
+
+        context 'by reviewer_id=None' do
+          let(:params) { { reviewer_id: 'None' } }
+          let(:expected_mr) { [merge_request4, merge_request5] }
+
+          it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(*expected_mr) }
+        end
+
+        context 'by reviewer_id=Any' do
+          let(:params) { { reviewer_id: 'Any' } }
+          let(:expected_mr) { [merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3] }
+
+          it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(*expected_mr) }
+        end
+
+        context 'by reviewer_id with unknown user' do
+          let(:params) { { reviewer_id: 99999 } }
+
+          it { is_expected.to be_empty }
+        end
+
+        context 'by NOT reviewer_id with unknown user' do
+          let(:params) { { not: { reviewer_id: 99999 } } }
+
+          it { is_expected.to be_empty }
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'filtering by group milestone' do
+        let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
+
+        before do
+          merge_request1.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
+          merge_request2.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns merge requests assigned to that group milestone' do
+          params = { milestone_title: group_milestone.title }
+
+          merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+
+          expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2)
+        end
+
+        context 'using NOT' do
+          let(:params) { { not: { milestone_title: group_milestone.title } } }
+
+          it 'returns MRs not assigned to that group milestone' do
+            merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+
+            expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5)
           end
         end
       end
@@ -563,6 +621,28 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestsFinder do
           expect(mrs).to eq([mr2])
         end
       end
+
+      it 'does not raise any exception with complex filters' do
+        # available filters from MergeRequest dashboard UI
+        params = {
+          project_id: project1.id,
+          scope: 'authored',
+          state: 'opened',
+          author_username: user.username,
+          assignee_username: user.username,
+          reviewer_username: user.username,
+          approver_usernames: [user.username],
+          approved_by_usernames: [user.username],
+          milestone_title: 'none',
+          release_tag: 'none',
+          label_names: 'none',
+          my_reaction_emoji: 'none',
+          draft: 'no'
+        }
+
+        merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+        expect { merge_requests.load }.not_to raise_error
+      end
     end
 
     describe '#row_count', :request_store do
diff --git a/spec/finders/releases/evidence_pipeline_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/releases/evidence_pipeline_finder_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8c435f7b0b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/finders/releases/evidence_pipeline_finder_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Releases::EvidencePipelineFinder, '#execute' do
+  let(:params) { {} }
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:tag_name) { project.repository.tag_names.first }
+  let(:sha) { project.repository.find_tag(tag_name).dereferenced_target.sha }
+  let!(:pipeline) { create(:ci_empty_pipeline, sha: sha, project: project) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(project, params).execute }
+
+  context 'when the tag is passed' do
+    let(:params) { { tag: tag_name } }
+
+    it 'returns the evidence pipeline' do
+      expect(subject).to eq(pipeline)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when the ref is passed' do
+    let(:params) { { ref: sha } }
+
+    it 'returns the evidence pipeline' do
+      expect(subject).to eq(pipeline)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'empty params' do
+    it 'returns nil' do
+      expect(subject).to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
+  # TODO: remove this with the release creation moved to it's own form https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/214245
+  context 'params[:evidence_pipeline] is present' do
+    let(:params) { { evidence_pipeline: pipeline } }
+
+    it 'returns the passed evidence pipeline' do
+      expect(subject).to eq(pipeline)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/merge_request_widget.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/merge_request_widget.json
index e2df7952d8f..c90f7af5892 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/merge_request_widget.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/merge_request_widget.json
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
         "merge_request_cached_widget_path": { "type": "string" },
         "commit_change_content_path": { "type": "string" },
         "conflicts_docs_path": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
+        "reviewing_and_managing_merge_requests_docs_path": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
         "merge_request_pipelines_docs_path": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
         "ci_environments_status_path": { "type": "string" },
         "issues_links": {
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/issue_link.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/issue_link.json
index 000e8485aca..588d63c2dcf 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/issue_link.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/issue_link.json
@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
      "link_type": {
        "type": "string",
        "enum": ["relates_to", "blocks", "is_blocked_by"]
-     }
+     },
+     "link_created_at": { "type": "date" },
+     "link_updated_at": { "type": "date" }
   },
   "required" : [ "source_issue", "target_issue", "link_type" ]
 }
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate.json b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ceb28006304
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate.json
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+[
+  {
+    "categories": [
+      "Complexity"
+    ],
+    "check_name": "argument_count",
+    "content": {
+      "body": ""
+    },
+    "description": "Method `new_array` has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.",
+    "fingerprint": "15cdb5c53afd42bc22f8ca366a08d547",
+    "location": {
+      "path": "foo.rb",
+      "lines": {
+        "begin": 10,
+        "end": 10
+      }
+    },
+    "other_locations": [],
+    "remediation_points": 900000,
+    "severity": "major",
+    "type": "issue",
+    "engine_name": "structure"
+  },
+  {
+    "categories": [
+      "Complexity"
+    ],
+    "check_name": "argument_count",
+    "content": {
+      "body": ""
+    },
+    "description": "Method `new_backwards_array` has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.",
+    "fingerprint": "f3bdc1e8c102ba5fbd9e7f6cda51c95e",
+    "location": {
+      "path": "foo.rb",
+      "lines": {
+        "begin": 14,
+        "end": 14
+      }
+    },
+    "other_locations": [],
+    "remediation_points": 900000,
+    "severity": "major",
+    "type": "issue",
+    "engine_name": "structure"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "Issue",
+    "check_name": "Rubocop/Metrics/ParameterLists",
+    "description": "Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [12/5]",
+    "categories": [
+      "Complexity"
+    ],
+    "remediation_points": 550000,
+    "location": {
+      "path": "foo.rb",
+      "positions": {
+        "begin": {
+          "column": 24,
+          "line": 14
+        },
+        "end": {
+          "column": 49,
+          "line": 14
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "content": {
+      "body": "This cop checks for methods with too many parameters.\nThe maximum number of parameters is configurable.\nKeyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count."
+    },
+    "engine_name": "rubocop",
+    "fingerprint": "ab5f8b935886b942d621399f5a2ca16e",
+    "severity": "minor"
+  }
+]
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate_without_errors.json b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate_without_errors.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fe51488c706
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codeclimate_without_errors.json
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+[]
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json
deleted file mode 100644
index 89cc4b46521..00000000000
--- a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-[{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `simulateDrag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a995a617b0ce0599b6d0a5649a308a8e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `simulateEvent` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e50b54fce33185efbb17d1c0d210b439","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `simulateDrag` has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75ffb8892dac22a9d50822bc69339ab2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1224000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"40f188d222bd1f110e8c11f08ec77c3f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/3d_viewer/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"95b71f07d08eb9e2368568c6d872f677","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_file_dropzone.js","lines":{"begin":21,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1440000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`FileTemplateMediator` has 29 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"02a64abfacf06440f6504888503fe571","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/file_template_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ede6d8c5878fbfdda2348d1c6a808f4b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initTargetBranchDropdown` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"748b8a39304544f015c0abcbee9b929c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js","lines":{"begin":116,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `start` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0272210e1d618fe95522ee47f652308","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/smart_interval.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `render` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ceb92ce0f43dbe13431f1f07d5787aff","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/tabs/tabs.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `file_icon_map.js` has 587 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33d443c482c7a34a3a721ef8677a9b9b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon/file_icon_map.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":590}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6052800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `gl_dropdown.js` has 935 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"144655d5e2aa528a6e4d63861c3bc2f1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":11064000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdownInput` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4679297a043d89d437946bd083443d13","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdownFilter` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c2b6bfd5d744ae2f9724aae0a60a765","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `filter` has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3be214723bb15219db661db421dccba1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdown` has 172 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"45e3d28c25ef43db19fcd1f8bf7a52dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":296,"end":481}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4128000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `parseData` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5a6929b08a7efc020e932267316a1ce4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":505,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `opened` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b32257d5ff71fd022c46be4ff3f196b6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":580,"end":627}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderItem` has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"119c9b263aba3cc2173646b63b83d58d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":698,"end":793}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1848000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `rowClicked` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e37288d65d5701c4b7d06560d3eb6910","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":820,"end":904}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addArrowKeyEvent` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ccf81453af86fd4e7f521423adbf28e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":971,"end":1015}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `highlightRowAtIndex` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a0b5b8a75d9f5726f8a559a3068bbfd9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1026,"end":1073}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":174,"end":184}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"603368a717652923897a9efd4f494784"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onOptionClick` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1ead8da9cc948075715df57538a53fb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onOptionClick` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa9f5f9cb36f5307a7db44c29b5f3a4c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setSearchedGroups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4116f1bf48693b8dbc3a19233c167489","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `formatGroupItem` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97209b6e238a05d220f90d1e1fcf7c78","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":96}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getGroups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f9fc97d0941125a5eb91818b85ac955","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/service/groups_service.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1cc8f54fcedff8d025db690e89c4d3bc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1128000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d34e04056341d2986626e42b9927e829","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/stores/clusters_store.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initLayoutNav` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"858063cf6c5a28edd5390360940941f1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/layout_nav.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `sidebarToggleClicked` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e95063093263d654532b1bda2499ae09","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/right_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleSidebar` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4667aa48f617e84611c658bd9e6fd42","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/right_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":201,"end":218}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f561803cb2a47ffaeed70a1f967105da","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/error.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `issueTemplate` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36dc94ada0224320b48f9dcddf971dd3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`Api` has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62c9c1d73c6c2f6f294b2c13a5c92e49","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":282}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `validate` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b07c343f7afe957592fac79043c9586","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/new_branch_form.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `labels_select.js` has 444 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34830d2a928eacedb749d5c66c3637e9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":517}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3993600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setDropdownData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"99aee27c164d2c53ee3386f64239ebc9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":466,"end":507}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 369 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca542a5aefb3dbadb5e0a0100a94b863","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":429}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8856000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `data` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00d06b2fdc398a9031e900f76184076f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderRow` has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ef4d877e54496d7ad4da0e0a0b96d9aa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":177,"end":235}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleLabel` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35ba5b5dab8a50aa713a5ba60e1db7a1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":242,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `hidden` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2dc1a005647c9e7e9f81e0eabeb9563d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":294,"end":324}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f7fb23f1a88e5dc4c8430529946de3dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":327,"end":414}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setDropdownData` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"955ed39a38f4f36c3ae0d23199b6b90d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":466,"end":507}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":407,"end":412}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cefdca8d12fc08aff6e7a861750e99d9"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":377}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"1d311ac9ae722bf786749b2125e5cf47"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":411,"end":411}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"7d42a3bbce082d2bbdc96d5eaa747454"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `storeEnvironments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70cce4c4dfcfa9c7fb820fc6dea68e9c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/stores/environments_store.js","lines":{"begin":36,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `storeEnvironments` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5b13b9d301832978862f37bcc22708f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/stores/environments_store.js","lines":{"begin":36,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `created` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"139fddb1aa522eb2c141871eab765fc3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4d0a598693b87337ee6b071a35c6da2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_context.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `dropzoneInput` has 210 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96984c8a7930ad755604f49c3edf6a2b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/dropzone_input.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":290}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5040000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ec26d8ddc2c55de770d1f8038f590f4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":67}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.ADD_NEW_NOTE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"026945d2d3de0e3f478ec55a7bb820f5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.REMOVE_PLACEHOLDER_NOTES` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26efdceb93879d8478e3c8a4f549bc22","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75cd5c2d207814d4a7c7fbf69c709fd6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `actions.js` has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e2580af22da5d9875ac924fda6d0551","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":337}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1502400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `saveNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9dbdac686defafb20b3397ccb7105ba3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":151,"end":226}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getQuickActionText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3019b0611c6febc7b696f0615d561d1b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `collapseSystemNotes` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"757d82e7c89224872a7bd7b269ed55c5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/collapse_utils.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":105}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"250bf3d3615586b7cdaecad2c187e0a0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/getters.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `jumpToDiscussion` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebbd3b5d75f27f2372eb1a56ca4d9206","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `keydown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1977a74c9fba9606480c93a63cb0d5c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydown` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6356352d7ef34cfddc4738ed0c5ebdbf","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `trigger` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ad4384530fc0032f4fafe9d12e7dc70","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `_loadData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"357b7070736cef3f382a2c3439a40d89","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `trigger` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc97a87fa8ec1b132731256b23616434","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `Keyboard` has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6b1d8f0930c09b5318307d0788ffca30","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `Keyboard` has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a812687f4ed1c53045b473f0d6aa5cb9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2304000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydown` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e7cbff360ff21f798bf424a899291302","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlightHash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2bd33253a3ff30d380e94d478d49a6e7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/line_highlighter.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlightRange` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4258948c78c182b6db020222636c12bb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/line_highlighter.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":157}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `checkElementsInView` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"08e5457bd1bcf2aa36f67185fb5ab932","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lazy_loader.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `loadImage` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e063810e532be97a06efabd3c56e4db","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lazy_loader.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a3ef386977d1577238533b8b5352a499","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `handleClickUnfold` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f82a7cc93be5e64d548469363a77a2fb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initMergeConflicts` has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd259a46f5e703e8f722acdac619ad79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflicts_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1944000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_conflict_store.js` has 357 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"131a2e61cbfe7efc49cced2ffab3568b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2740800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setParallelLine` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f005034ab86d552698a2211ae91ae99a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":101,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `isReadyToCommit` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"184e70a4c8de2226d5a4b197c147f2e8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":315,"end":351}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":331,"end":333}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"78a238497c0c8acd6ddefbb67176f033"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `init` has 216 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c8af9cd2b45c1c2e6e24c4678a9c6fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":253}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5184000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5e3838b8db3f11da2f72d9acaf52a17","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":250}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2184000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":187,"end":187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9265cc21e5d1eb1bebd044e85db1bf79"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":220,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"36ba0880a027f4448128be161cf33b26"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createFlash` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8f8d96fc8578fb3f7f7bf875e0668a0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/flash.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `textBuilder` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"877ac84192b385c963c08bb4ef960d3b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2f702de12038884b25d0ef63861bd2b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ref_select_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setConfig` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33b2d4c912bf8eb7a3c4b9c2d3302729","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notes.js` has 1338 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"515dff155804bebfe20a78b3935600eb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":16867200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `keydownNoteText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4a28bd8f572a9cb26ff49edf77e2d3a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc0dc1a78ad18f837b6cead5d11a5ac2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":403,"end":462}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderDiscussionNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dbb0fd84250020e115dbb0554f3dfc2a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":471,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleDiffNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddb3cba4008791217e07933b09a14951","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1054,"end":1124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateTargetButtons` has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ea9fe607edc9cf98ef50a17584952c2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1196,"end":1241}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `postComment` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc8dd67d9f1598e83dc132f50b7f0726","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1604,"end":1796}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`Notes` has 74 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5363864915c583936ec6c63c5ed96689","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":1856}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"25812d53d4eb0f340c33a5a5ddca467a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":121}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1296000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addBinding` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b40ee2b94454885b3fd51a8bc139c1c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":127,"end":180}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydownNoteText` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85df701d158d32b25dca1c2039b6a3be","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderNote` has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8dfb4b9b4d144d82422186651b46b3e4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":403,"end":462}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderDiscussionNote` has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"52b66ad02e73c9b1c8848bd1affad7fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":471,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `removeNote` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c1e3976ef9bdf79365857e0b8bcb5d8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":848,"end":911}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setupDiscussionNoteForm` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1b7947a88bd1e4b3519e282320fbb38","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":956,"end":1009}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleDiffNote` has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60ae737d4dc10fe0af6e670d2d4bc7e2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1054,"end":1124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1464000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateTargetButtons` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ccd0067a20bb8afcaf3317b434b1ece","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1196,"end":1241}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createPlaceholderNote` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddcd3bc4735c7d763b0fe5da55217278","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `postComment` has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcdd1766ceaaa90c770bddfe75d120cd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1604,"end":1796}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3432000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateComment` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c508bf1571f9f4d795de4cb8ef1930a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1811,"end":1855}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":264}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cd548cc7c1ebbb2263b1d2ecdb94a5dd"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":272,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cd548cc7c1ebbb2263b1d2ecdb94a5dd"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":275,"end":275}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"25fb735695be215146eaf2300412aae0"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `itemClicked` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86a06125a02d35c7e121952daf7f0f08","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `itemClicked` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e7751795d821a7afa57ab25dbd658ee4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `filterHint` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22102abbd93e4d53a0798ecf7e058512","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getSearchQuery` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26e123d9f4a95bfa34a59f42db0ae260","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `processTokens` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"28cb3a1b7fa1a51cd968e9016415efea","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `processTokens` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"287e8c4963cc8869358280d31e4d4005","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `loadDropdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31af8cc264fa78512d238c04106208fe","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":219}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setDropdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6dda613591636a58b06a298d0980498f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setupMapping` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f12b787fff78b0b8986506eb90b1997c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `load` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90c65f9cea258055f67defcb61f63abb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":165,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `filtered_search_manager.js` has 514 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"45105bf38088a343a5a9c0e1ca76840e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":645}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5001600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setup` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c08d2326cb1eb811c4329b3ee92fc04","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `checkForEnter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2056e10cb965de92a331a6181618ff7f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":265}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `handleInputVisualToken` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ef6573dc182d159eb13ddd70be42653","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":398,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`FilteredSearchManager` has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dee04c9127382346c9edead8ceb49788","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":644}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setup` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc525f4373639fe1e5e079259d587918","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `bindEvents` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0036874f7fdfa7b481bccec4adce2fd9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":145,"end":182}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `handleInputVisualToken` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"105fd464c05f365ea496107488c4d048","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":398,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadSearchParamsFromURL` has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc0a70cc2480e01d46d52df00f42980b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":463,"end":543}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1512000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `search` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d31d46c10a7c7b27cba3e79c2c7e684","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":558,"end":607}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":524,"end":529}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b4fcaa9a90b83251c167ce6bd363ead0"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":530,"end":533}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b9acc2eaf5ae1dd8b6f24ac70e97ace6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `users_select.js` has 594 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e6ca5bcc402f0dae9a9869dd46e4e77","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":701}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6153600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `UsersSelect` has 524 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4438d98e020e34865089e812790a72e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":628}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12576000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `processData` has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e7c9e224218cce1f434b0a0ff4616c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2112000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19cb3539002fa7a4aa2abf730fc550bc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":468}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1536000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderRow` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b67cb57917ef04a8b05e4be075bf6c0b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":493,"end":531}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `query` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"447defa81cda25e0ae3f708d8cb7f927","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":553,"end":604}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleCollapsed` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01ddc746dbdfa4103552d4d09bda67bd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/image_diff/helpers/dom_helper.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addBadge` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5cb8fbd4ee1e42eb778a29cd02efc8f5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/image_diff/image_diff.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1579b1a9e97ea98e6348df70287ccd85","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/job.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getBuildTrace` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0990625843278c1e0d27866b6e51ec9b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/job.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":163}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setVisibilityOptions` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bd793c0b96469cb6904241d8beea60c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_visibility.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `restore` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebd9e5c02ce67b5fecb0e9a610fa01a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/autosave.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `populateActiveMetrics` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0808d7392776f800f01eb00247cb49fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadActiveMetrics` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2f56d70d330df4e004e4e730ec9bd7d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `adminInit` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb6b998e81923ba316eb986d14f16ef7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/admin.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d23e829e807e7cfa7fa60a5bd8bd2a4f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"59ee4d34d9113510c329a2b264aae308"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `showTab` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2db6bb70760f9a2493d374e830395ef3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/signin_tabs_memoizer.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"364739acddb57495be3b94860555f2ae","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initRefSwitcher` has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e62a2b92cc28ef2e2c5cc5e391c1b3c1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":155}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1512000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initLabelIndex` has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6cbf4de48d122212aa6790bce385c52","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1728000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `stat_graph_contributors_graph.js` has 260 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d70980224b971643c65164d7599d8306","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":315}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1344000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsGraph` has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5ffd1e9b7f7eb20d76540029db76ea5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1632000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsMasterGraph` has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c90cea5a64860bd8ebc11adfe43f966f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":109,"end":225}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2352000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsAuthorGraph` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb2ba67ac3c7b0319408d414f7ab4a89","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":227,"end":314}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `parse_log` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"54a68f13ca92482f197897caa4dde8c6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderSidebar` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a8652d503fb546ee9566f5bf3f473ac","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/wikis/wikis.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `activity_calendar.js` has 257 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c8cf6370baf6d39528465c33a636bdaa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":300}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12e8c60549aefe50a5602474054d85e9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70826affaa552c98140c396bd20b2321","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderDays` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b25511a5a67d72f5494bf518b57f8945","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":182}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderKey` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f239dc6410f68cc561519c650b54fe79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":257}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"910e3f36c66a265e42a8eaf26a167c4b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/show/search.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1560000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `showPreview` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1721f777313e23b7b202fa7491480968","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `copy_as_gfm.js` has 400 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac03b65c923edc62a2698fa8d47bed20","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":510}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3360000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `transformCodeSelection` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c2c7d04215c2bd2989380d4ec16d2fdd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":392,"end":428}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `nodeToGFM` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"203624a0d90ac2910cd61598bd1ba9c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":430,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`gfmRules` has 23 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cef7679aa1f25cb0fb0333b4dfea466","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":169,"end":306}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `transformCodeSelection` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc79eaa8e95f40163769d11480f6ca8c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":392,"end":428}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `nodeToGFM` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"abacf74acfb9ae1429676cb952d5250f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":430,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":472,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4dc32f63393b2dba3bb2b4186a5a9d3c"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initPageShortcuts` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e91b97abbe33722ed743c916435f0ab","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3992dd4b39964f74489f5037465f0968","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateTopState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4115079d252dabe584b1839baffa5696","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `bindEvents` has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d911289330106e823f8b66a27a6de9a8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2376000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `chooseTemplate` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38d61f9d4b3748a9e5ab863d54f4ccf8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":98,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `search_autocomplete.js` has 417 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"92cc9af55c3a4ab73da8e1f0d3edd029","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":506}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3604800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc8158cb371adf854571129bd363b7ef","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":149,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getCategoryContents` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8c7fe125446a794240cdecc04543593","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":305}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onSearchInputKeyUp` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f647cc28b710d6de8a6b35f3f79f3ce","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":348,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onClick` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b118715fdcf7b3e7ac25f69bb1baa423","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":445,"end":458}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`SearchAutocomplete` has 28 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4afabdab2d1c2b911d6a1c563638e8e6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":501}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setSearchOptions` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba3145218ad79282dc1d42a52ae16802","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"27f6673ed668afd5ac9f3fd3c02a5e40","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":72,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getData` has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a21aceb13c361e2e3e0299baa560bed5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":149,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2064000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getCategoryContents` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"415e6e1a246f7b01199ed828bdebb278","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":305}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onSearchInputKeyUp` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"438f5589be7d3c9865113320e8a85fc4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":348,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlighter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"034f805c8a510c0c46e35c2e4fb8d329","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_find_file.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `selectRow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b2917d9725004429f0a4319beac0822e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_find_file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":143}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b590709d469cb1c8c28f467e53d2154","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af0c07eddd69b8e22c3e13c7474122a1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleDiff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"098b6e689349244e7adddfcad90974a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/single_file_diff.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onSaveClicked` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18922f177ff6315e508e19e5d7a6cd4d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ci_variable_list/ajax_variable_list.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf8b6d0bf24fc15e2c0e87e1c6b6a636","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ci_variable_list/ci_variable_list.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `jumpToNextUnresolvedDiscussion` has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"792eaacd2770c50c0a42bce535c7bee9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/jump_to_discussion.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `jumpToNextUnresolvedDiscussion` has 102 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"784d361fd1ec4da2fc3be0e85d1e354e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/jump_to_discussion.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2448000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `buttonText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b0d7c1b1146fa7930c3c14fef72db27","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/comment_resolve_btn.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `diffNotesCompileComponents` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ec443ad0f520ec34248990713c0f0b5a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/diff_notes_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01a425e5bd2ad64d006f35854f477ad0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f1015e96e281a9a77bdaeeba619aa36b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c99f8cbe0230e2f1d48ff4478f2117c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2640000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `timeScaleFormat` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f52e997312984f599f152d3260bf8654","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/date_time_formatters.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":800000,"severity":"critical","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"531fa4647bfb14d1172613e86257dd28"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6d1e6ad89a6aec9b87ec051dfa0099d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":88,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.REMOVE_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"967d987657c3659898f377b3d07be15b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":137,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"08263cf95339fef038c9b82b56e70844","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":88,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `startRenderDiffsQueue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d28a6db58513b7ea1157b081952903c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `addLineReferences` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"782481c579d96128e5d0793c04d6113b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `prepareDiffData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69f60a55e02467d84573c99a4caa96e1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getNoteFormData` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2408381b663271af2ce36e4cfec0ef64","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addLineReferences` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e04f00e197ce4b77a3fa65c55e66cb1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `prepareDiffData` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fa4b2e2a939b7a261a1e47aea3b124e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `shouldRenderParallelCommentRow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf200732380b3f0a2a2993c8cb3d3a71","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initDiffsApp` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"37689c9906180d81c8f636a1285361fa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `create_merge_request_dropdown.js` has 391 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"efe0e6e60956f829c50aea15ff89a81c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3230400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onChangeInput` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"51e3d7e3f8979e2acacf219907cfae33","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateInputState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"15a5141561c69faaf772cc24838b9882","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":433,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`CreateMergeRequestDropdown` has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d33b610bd5704267ec05a9b7b5e44e0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":488}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9408c08016dc994d8ab6445d06b9e1ba","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onChangeInput` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5627e01c10e2d6e1299f91b38024a0a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateInputState` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5126386129e905b8737efa7b7aadb02e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":433,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":321,"end":321}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"8643526d248036a3735dc9a6e2e57920"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addToImport` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5c4a1a17a8903f8c6dd885142d0e5a7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/importer_status.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `autoUpdate` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86f5ee9b3a803d7476f4c94f06eeb20f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/importer_status.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":123}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `deviseState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc96fa07083c1de787a6bff9f39300d8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `deviseState` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b9fdc968681b9a4d1a00bdaebcf5513e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":13}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"7e01335e6a48fbcffe9b977a5893e0c1"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":15}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"06b18956af744e4ba0818ef408ae519a"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b6db36d200c40a47864a6c82d74ecdd9"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"94cbbf89dae775243077f30c7139777f"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":21,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"407c4389388a40459b3a50e566ec4695"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"c9317c489fdab4a76a50dbc5cebcfa17"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":25,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"d69b63a794f4784245d6a949c148e1c8"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"766dbcf000fa7d4e2636539267ea8cee"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9c3dd1c5c99c0b2e367eaf0f6c483688"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9735ac3532df3e31eea793eb471bcd3e"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"6a3a4a85c8ee79ec2d8e4ea2cf165674"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c334ad6c327b60fc52e19d4b1a441be0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setData` has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"590c6f1bfea578d864bdc64a2fa9a1da","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2112000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `groupsSelect` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d30e631abef41c7858e8c2b472ab41b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `groupsSelect` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ced5ccd57fcd0e841cc27868cc850186","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setAjaxGroupsSelect2` has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb6c68e362058d81fc462714f431d13d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1704000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setConfig` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93dedf1db90bd5e014f609731004784e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":25,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `memberExpirationDate` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93c026069e6f3fae025e1bf3bf480e0b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/member_expiration_date.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_request_tabs.js` has 311 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91dcee71900ea33c229c8f115d145f57","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":477}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2078400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2c515fc51ceabbbd6bcacbadf7b409c8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `tabShown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca9c966746914ecd639f907aed00306a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":159,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5e286159c60ca68824ec344d5dec0145","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `tabShown` has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5752347dcb1fd9940bd4bc3d21abd442","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":159,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1344000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadDiff` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3eedd69a3c93529e5939b19ecf1b3e32","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":331,"end":401}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleLabelPriority` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17bb8b4767aa6ee7a9db29cd4297dfd1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/label_manager.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleLabelPriority` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac24663bc55eac3c9635bccf3a68dc5a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/label_manager.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cd0496900d30272b32ee2e3adf188ae","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `addIssue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70f0f8ea0547b7001e920932e4980ddc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/list.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addIssue` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f1eced6b6dca9d960756de9b56ac3c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/list.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `moveIssueInList` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3726eea384e1d9e6d6d8eebb989b0a55","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":152,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `moveIssueToList` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc191b6dd17cde39e7dd162fd47e19c7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `moveIssueToList` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0501fa18f105e7c808db7348aee50cb4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `newListDropdownInit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8f897d86e7796b5b3d49f700124b5adb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `newListDropdownInit` has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f73b08dfbb16f388d03764aefc71b663","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1224000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `projectSelect` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ccd46aac4a6745374730b2c4f0f1a7f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_select.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `query` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8facf3a4b06c65c72b401a6ae241812e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_select.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `swipe` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cd344682f57e11e94307c0ae71e31b21","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/image_file.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":153}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onion-skin` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d98db2ac5d0ba5352c5501d8e616908a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/image_file.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":193}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `mergeUrlParams` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9586f62e5526e65ea5dea846d2d34814","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/url_utility.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `common_utils.js` has 421 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b2e1f175792cddc3122cb26f6f2901b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":647}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3662400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `handleLocationHash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"73cd83cbd5164515c6be6e51ced09b94","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `urlParamsToObject` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"87d0167946e02e230645b1a8b4416926","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":152,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createOverlayIcon` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1195653ae898b98df0d276acb1429b55","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":458,"end":505}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onload` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3e5a07a00d95bb2f853dee0c1c50e98","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":462,"end":502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `isSticky` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5704d88401ccd1910b07573165064f6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/sticky.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ff368be1929703177fe923eb38be8a2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `moveCursor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"78da0046365fa4a2a913735a7884c4fe","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c17d7ff9d0dfd043e0ac8b46e612742","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f38a0d7dccba49d8195065ab71f8ef39","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleScroll` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1904c8e94b053af5f2371dece57951f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/logoutput_behaviours.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getMonthNames` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5630d70a3018ea651454e11d959c7e26","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getTimeago` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"915cddbb51190cedb7c5488e6d3f715a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `dateInWords` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35c8c58c18a9af9c0ee997ae5d4b8e48","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":201,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initKeyNav` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90bcaab65ebc8665cd94e8e6286ad7d3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `generateUnicodeSupportMap` has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3235c3b88f6c553ff280eac9faec19fa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/support/unicode_support_map.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":141}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1128000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getUnicodeSupportMap` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9342f9326c59d8e19277db8a2cb8500","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/support/unicode_support_map.js","lines":{"begin":143,"end":178}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `glEmojiTag` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"580f88e3583b6c310ded6fbad9390305","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/index.js","lines":{"begin":69,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initDropdown` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"301e9b71ddb9969243fc57daa227b33b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/lib/sidebar_move_issue.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `branch_graph.js` has 307 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8f961e52cddbca0cb2dd3290c7063853","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":352}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2020800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `buildGraph` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18ed687a5ecc08e272ec3f5a1e45ba85","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderPartialGraph` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"790548e7db64ebbadd07868d6c20245b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":141,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `appendLabel` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"918265d9fa262a2ea6ddda4b96f04407","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":211,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `drawLines` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"df364db884043c3c81e753fb9a58ee90","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":286,"end":333}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `testWrap` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"65093271e08f9838db54de85e17d7c79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `commitTooltip` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c2753572072946d03cae221981b2a147","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `testWrap` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ac8fefe6574f998844a591c4dff399c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.TOGGLE_LOADING` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"41230e2a140c3c519f16d17067a948c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.RENAME_ENTRY` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"65c7f9e9aa2de7fa4e24860dbded9820","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":263}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 26 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee3f6d8624f678d9741d386c4252f0fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":269}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.RENAME_ENTRY` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"98f116d65b4aa0e565234027efee827f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":263}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.SET_FILE_RAW_DATA` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6460bb9792e8eedb0b1e558f229e6ffa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.DISCARD_FILE_CHANGES` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa62953384fc873bd8bddabed1341a3a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `closeFile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca626095e258a497e9cf9c1fa4b7537e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `createCommitPayload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ead12c6a7c7c105251c94c6af2fda7b0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `decorateData` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8abacda37ac495ce54d8ce69e488724","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":158,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"75e7e39f5b8ea0aadff2470a9b44ca68"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `entries` has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1a9caa4d3fce207f88b2afafe14a1df0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/workers/files_decorator_worker.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1608000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.RECEIVE_LASTEST_PIPELINE_SUCCESS` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac7ea082c786419244a234de0970ebc9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.RECEIVE_LASTEST_PIPELINE_SUCCESS` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0883c6639137c6b51cad4b57c0dd1c38","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d98be7e83cb9dbc1ca8775da0aa7d19","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/common/model.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initIde` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34f27cc8f1c849369b0095674a48c531","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/index.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `init` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c6f3babcfd2a42ae88ffe4cc05028dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pager.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":10}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f19d7f17b74ab07e9651e12680b14b9d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/profile/gl_crop.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onModalShow` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c0421daee7918d81456c8580b8878457","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/profile/gl_crop.js","lines":{"begin":69,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initMrNotes` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4dd3a8bed3022600ffaa03ba5cc77fe6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"815b15d961f84ea742e6dce8eb3f8a4d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cbc52cfd6436c771188ac8f4e355cb9b","location":{"path":"app/validators/branch_filter_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8179f4c2dfe625c27616c834d37a930","location":{"path":"app/validators/js_regex_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":16}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d1ca6a4b7e3294fdc110a8e0ea47f92","location":{"path":"app/validators/cluster_name_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d62539a99ae9fabba3cd2cc96713cf09","location":{"path":"app/validators/abstract_path_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectTeam` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce2cc10520ba3b4b7205e61120d67315","location":{"path":"app/models/project_team.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_kube_client!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e929847f530fa79a8a58054b9aa3fb8e","location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":125,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `note.rb` has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f0768574ccb05a5f08cf2e994799fa2","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":474}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2280000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `grouped_diff_discussions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e55577fec2bb70f0e880e0e8d0f42ec","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":168}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `in_reply_to?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a17100ec3750af84df807aff92514aa5","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":367,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Note` has 56 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d5c3b8714fe08a2c7df66bc4bfdc538","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":474}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `track_greatest` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee586dc1932745869e3f752d180242c9","location":{"path":"app/models/internal_id.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rename_descendants` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"41d2108d52e96b7975591b300d3b2e60","location":{"path":"app/models/route.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":306,"end":313}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":400000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"1cd63fdd17237f7c081abfa37690a7fe"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `as_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"430a48264a7379f4d248d672bb16fe44","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `readable_by?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"05cd07a39aaac900028cc3b49079c531","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":301,"end":315}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Issue` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9619613b02f7bb8841b9e19c688f5251","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":326}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cached_attr_reader` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a0b7bc4cebaa36fff63efc3ada11817","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/redis_cacheable.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `move_dir` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75dea312f0b07cc41974f687ba6fc64","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/storage/legacy_namespace.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expand_hierarchy_for_child` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5222419d454a07f66c83180e4789d18","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/group_descendant.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `expand_hierarchy_for_child` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5cd85b2e5055a268df55df99d4d5a94e","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/group_descendant.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `avatar_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6177dbe195b50f7a5b10734fbc4a8d2","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/avatarable.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8e8f8a2e9ccd006ae8f61ca9db92d0c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/reactive_caching.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `exclusively_update_reactive_cache!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2811b2ef3d5196f0b89cec43f1f2b465","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/reactive_caching.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_binary_column_exists!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23444612f22a67bddc69d4fb3d9ab40a","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/sha_attribute.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `current` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"37517b27e64777d7506564ebffc2a9fa","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/cacheable_attributes.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `chronic_duration_attr_writer` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8acb577138f44873e03ae5712c65f31d","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/chronic_duration_attribute.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncated_diff_lines` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bade7fdd3ab51990a34487352c56728","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/discussion_on_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `calculate_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff34ec3cc17426f2d12b615f23171aad","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/prometheus_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `position_between` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f9f931c8a1748472719ac1b03432d6c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `status_sql` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46850ccc347015917b7f7d5813dfbb20","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/has_status.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_internal_id` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1753643cebf17fe9b88665c4895f0bc6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/atomic_internal_id.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_by_full_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9de369584b4bc5dcd50146b7967ef3b0","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/routable.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `where_full_path_in` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1d7711a695fff8bdfaa49dc578b0132c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/routable.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `manual_inverse_association` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53ad262470fd01998ef23cb50fac0495","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/manual_inverse_association.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw_participants` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"014b735c6a47b089e8ef4112c427cdf6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/participable.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_batch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5ca9b6fe345855869ed62b41036772f6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/each_batch.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_batch` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e56746932db5150f690993cd09ec2c5a","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/each_batch.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_authentication_token_field` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ffe8c5e6736ff7519d2b0ad210f55dd","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/token_authenticatable.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_hook_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"651dd445a68aa882af831870aac09fe6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/issuable.rb","lines":{"begin":264,"end":290}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notes_with_associations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"edf734b8128847bcceb4300c584ab8e9","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/issuable.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":334}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `max_member_access_for_resource_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a3525a1273d674a7a5dd1b4599a6b80","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/bulk_member_access_load.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enum_with_nil` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d195530dc1d564b6a5a2361310657dd7","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/enum_with_nil.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_str` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf445c84a1f8ebfebacc811382517d81","location":{"path":"app/models/label_note.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notifiable?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"76278bc24d3f0c41a172b68e2f632daa","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_access?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4264d898878128898c4e12b32b905f8a","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_notification_setting` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf0f0817b180212c8e825cbbed40b752","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":144,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `closest_non_global_group_notification_settting` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9f65343a59de0315d68462b18f90defe","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":157,"end":169}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"d25d7135d797df677ee520a8a97ae9a6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `find_commits_by_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c28ee46d93aa21d37eeb5b2a26d394f","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository.rb` has 758 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"849ce5e0e3a20d8ed78311435ce5fce9","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1058}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8515200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `keep_around` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ffb83b66ddf0a719303059ae40ce506","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":249,"end":262}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38d273d7d1372c09c7a5c165e170a642","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":647,"end":659}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `next_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53a66b748f45002bcdd585986f4f828f","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":684,"end":697}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 128 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ffa67f7557cad6dc009a3331141e757","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":1058}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enabled` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38454ee90e05a227558719509fe5ec29","location":{"path":"app/models/remote_mirror.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RemoteMirror` has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"24334db25a09b73ccd711bb06c29a822","location":{"path":"app/models/remote_mirror.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":229}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c206e4584e2321188004de82f54d910","location":{"path":"app/models/commit_range.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `user.rb` has 1050 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"11e77959335527c9cb28992c10d37866","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12720000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `increment_failed_attempts!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"51accad62fa466380528844722430a98","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1253,"end":1264}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_user_rights_and_limits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7a575c65331c7b917638baa8941d41c","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1405,"end":1414}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `signup_domain_valid?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a9b5f7bc9d9c55cfe5d888bed2fb420a","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1416,"end":1441}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `User` has 178 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f685bcbb6f822884dec234767db1861a","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":1502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":17000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project.rb` has 1664 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"531155f760c7355b54c66683855d1397","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":2277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":21561600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_or_update_import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"669b48913bc191fe053ef3cf863c7b51","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":691,"end":706}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_import_state` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c647270223f46682704c8933072ea030","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":732,"end":745}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_limit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"238a83e94e0d19d7e5bf774e737f1856","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":887,"end":899}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_or_initialize_services` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5c439340a2145fd43e3c155a46b8084","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1084,"end":1110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_repository_path_availability` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"84ad9cf46f3288017a0f4b6db6438a6c","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1302,"end":1316}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_create_default_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a2d29b10f840adb402e27183b8afb0e","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1685,"end":1704}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `container_registry_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22330faec24429812d37099efaf8566b","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1811,"end":1821}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_update_attribute_error` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"103e8043443b236e57b2b71b4071ed2a","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":2240,"end":2250}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_branch_allows_collaboration?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a44b195efa5fdd8f8a133a9382fe540","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":2252,"end":2276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Project` has 258 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64039fbe3749f7d87b4ba7e85868d7fc","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":2277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":25000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f45455ad20cdb5129a3bfb9eebb6498b","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Service` has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96ce9f4a9d59b553ec55116c8a3be7ae","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `available_services_names` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2ec9d5c5ae446fb75d746688a3a72fe","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":247,"end":284}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw_binary?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ae3aeb7a760efb26099272499cfbade","location":{"path":"app/models/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Blob` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a44f4d9e927f1b91399b8e17fb943f6d","location":{"path":"app/models/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":254}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `event.rb` has 309 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6850b538f65ad91cf5c5ef2e7148924e","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":410}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2049600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `visible_to_user?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"29269e08d03641e18bd2ba7cd22a0d3f","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":151,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `action_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f28caae33540f5326e5ce2d58a03d771","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":287}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Event` has 50 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"613c580b618dad28f34b389f766efe2e","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":410}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `different_group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ac2c358921313bb5981e964133c5ecf","location":{"path":"app/models/project_group_link.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge_request_version_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d1a8357abf058d725c59df9cca495bf","location":{"path":"app/models/diff_discussion.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `active?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"772f6211e69bcffb4fbc411c5d7d31c3","location":{"path":"app/models/legacy_diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/legacy_diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4e0039e61f3fd67caeb1b978db868447"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `group.rb` has 290 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9e231fdbc15e514e21e1596b5e2d930","location":{"path":"app/models/group.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":403}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Group` has 53 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f82613684deaaf389431887bc5a62c74","location":{"path":"app/models/group.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":403}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4500000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Label` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9660fb59aa00ace0b608078c78c611a4","location":{"path":"app/models/label.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_intermediates?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc033b957f3fcb1bd690b7edb50aa441","location":{"path":"app/models/pages_domain.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":98}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `PagesDomain` has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"389a0c10cffbc7cd770d8d67a31e61ba","location":{"path":"app/models/pages_domain.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_slug` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d507615693230a051c9d4ae397fe5d2","location":{"path":"app/models/environment.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":203}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Environment` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4140683d4224f01a7fe2fad0da3d11c6","location":{"path":"app/models/environment.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectWiki` has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7ff4b093a326a93bf1e0887a36ba898","location":{"path":"app/models/project_wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":203}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `track` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d55ffd71690c0e606bcb1fa48074affd","location":{"path":"app/models/user_interacted_project.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8737f9bae4ea49696d911b5b162784ef","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":215,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"43c91a5205fef35946442db85ab54267","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":283,"end":295}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `WikiPage` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35e7d7ce82a5641563ba1029c54645bc","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":326}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_position` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fa4f67c27ab14379e44af70d58264c1a","location":{"path":"app/models/diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":173}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `append` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d527adfd814d095e55079d7a898a3fc3","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build_trace_chunk.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `pipeline.rb` has 488 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cee8532683fbbb22a3b807c5714c49c7","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":671}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4627200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_yaml_from_repo` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f19177ae4080cc2c9d81a39383b45922","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":632,"end":639}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Pipeline` has 68 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af1e8c39d8b166628ae043bce72269a5","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":670}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `build.rb` has 604 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7967fd1fb861d27e33c208d88261cd76","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":809}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6297600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `scoped_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e310e4c57a2e9123f26a1cbcec9809eb","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":312,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `predefined_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"13282d4d569e2daa02632e5249568733","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":726,"end":745}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `legacy_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"81e2fd25bb2dd91faed640216e965698","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":747,"end":759}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `persisted_environment_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67327cbc303019830fbd1d6586dcde3e","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":761,"end":772}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Build` has 100 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"736c24725c78f957ee4538a1ef73cab0","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":808}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":9200000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c700cdde3d0b6292dd18227b3e90cf8d","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Runner` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a9c3d8a2409fd9c5506a846374c16d42","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":320}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Discussion` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21189089f43b68ee94981dbac970d566","location":{"path":"app/models/discussion.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_format_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0e735e47b6b8a533b9ff579e13b277c9","location":{"path":"app/models/milestone.rb","lines":{"begin":261,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Milestone` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"283d777de6e0e7974ccbb1e316f5fd1a","location":{"path":"app/models/milestone.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":288}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d0fba50527ad864dc4649245f95f1bf","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/drone_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `calculate_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa74471515edc43c1ab5339ddf68e505","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/drone_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a0446e31eb4d865b34fe5938f53bbad","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07a9999f0d84368d5983e08e2891f237","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":111,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notify_for_ref?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6a030ca161112b5f434986ab0ae88c0f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChatNotificationService` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d159cd60a69a3f1a1b5beb530264825","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69dbb9ff98b20cc8db3a809b7e239e5f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/mock_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `KubernetesService` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2e6c7a0448e9bb4e799cb7efe0846fc7","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8fb7749a6cc98bccd8d5712c1d499494","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":132}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_properties` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a965dd277aee3504a57790eb7271cadb","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/issue_tracker_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `buildkite_endpoint` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"161d47385d79643f9414ed2ad67502a9","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/buildkite_service.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"42914696303830e3d209925e13650d83","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fields` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"773d8cd6842c7b74f60e9ab8003ad977","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b760b5c22532a27dbd776328b7db9a6","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"802d66c5bd557b6f1bdd32240846e4c2","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pipelines_email_service.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `jira_service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5f438f6b31722193eb4e10b389655b6","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":344}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `close_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f74475ea9bd04b9ed8ff7ddcc5c29633","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":117,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_cross_reference_note` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6c27b1c9b77bd4f2d2f11a294e90cf36","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":137,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `JiraService` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2d0643b626f1ad53bf43aadedd954eae","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":344}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2f5469088e256c3b81eccc8ecaf967b","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":94,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcb9db20f4fe6adda5925e7da947a943","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_push_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f972562d25c4198e75c8dac6931a928","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `HipchatService` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb12852ed6419e4dea808d1d873302a1","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":311}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_note_message` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96500251c9498d9f1e9c7da0c8384528","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":200,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_channel` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e064d1923f5ef24f603e3c03af81644f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/irker_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6ee148a09cf8c383948472d577bfb74","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/asana_service.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Namespace` has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"411d817f1a6db72f360bb2cb93e055ec","location":{"path":"app/models/namespace.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":302}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `application_setting.rb` has 387 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"50270695e6d7c5163050078e7cf65e18","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3172800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ApplicationSetting` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"02be76880912851331582ab14ef56dd4","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `defaults` has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4a5e7733302a5f59e7878ab40f6b9f82","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":232,"end":309}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1824000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `base_commit_sha` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70d6880ba8e52f184e9eaf896119e352","location":{"path":"app/models/compare.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit.rb` has 355 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c361e4106ded93f757f69964f420b067","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":508}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2712000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `order_by` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4e54c836dbfddf9329a85f83378cb5","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `uri_type` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac39422eaa05c0e3880afe76c6341f18","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":425,"end":435}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Commit` has 68 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2175bec55ffd09f5d7b2352b5c5dcad","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":508}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_request.rb` has 897 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59d143493fc6a1f49dd6ff46bba4459f","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":10516800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"95d0d3fa4206c77bab101daf5035ee18","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":524}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_fork` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68cf8c7f9bbbebf2133c22434d2bcae9","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":532,"end":539}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mergeable_state?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bdc249b8456dc07607ba4fe001ff1261","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":677,"end":685}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_merge_request_closes_issues!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcd9dc4beba740e5c019b9c760cacdd3","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":769,"end":782}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `compare_test_reports` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b662bb8a5b01a77feb8b7b0a9ffefdb2","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1041,"end":1054}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mergeable_with_quick_action?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74fd9deeffa5589190ba744e4af78384","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1177,"end":1187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequest` has 137 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"417a10e5eb9495ae2d250b8c195971f7","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":682,"end":682}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"ac1600795e5aff84e3d4e9243b88bdbc"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1184,"end":1184}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4cc86fde220f02f2e1c1443c9c96fe93"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `member.rb` has 297 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ead9a1c0eaecbe741f755dd85ef04b38","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1876800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `retrieve_member` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9cf98664280114d55fe07fc00a2931f4","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Member` has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c62b78b2bb4b49f04e64fa24a5e7525","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `set` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8869fa571b5fb7a617adc0197c7ac362","location":{"path":"app/models/active_session.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `count_to_display_commit_in_center` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b411aa7c155fd11004316e7fd39fd0f0","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `place_chain` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"177c4e2e8eb1351747941148b8c5841f","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":180,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `take_left_leaves` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07eb1c8a024e1084d5249e442c56ead6","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `place_chain` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d89c4cb61eca0dac9322942ca4b87aff","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":180,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save_diffs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c6b7ee6cba58c9eb3d9ad5eed75d6ec3","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":272,"end":296}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestDiff` has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7a32bf8ffc7cc2cb0b417114258fc44","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `object_storage.rb` has 315 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86494fa0d557a4aa389e5171896783dc","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":458}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2136000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `changed_mounts` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fd0a4f3d9448639f581ace634e78fb9f","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":113,"end":124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `workhorse_remote_upload_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e022c746daf5a42b94b0696cad68db33","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":191,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unsafe_migrate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1684da513e48bc7fed9d7d05f006f4f3","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":415,"end":442}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `record_upload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7714f01e58a6f57d5612758293fdcd98","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/records_uploads.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `open` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3420c6ebb4c5709171dfe0ad626a693","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/gitlab_uploader.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `FileUploader` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"377d9736f93da216ab2620478b97b6a7","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/file_uploader.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ecf5e5baa621e39be46cda7a6b7e79a","location":{"path":"app/presenters/merge_request_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestPresenter` has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8382c7b1054d55cea9b796fc549636ad","location":{"path":"app/presenters/merge_request_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":231}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `cards` has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56c716082acebaebac8f5817c4770ff3","location":{"path":"app/presenters/conversational_development_index/metric_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1896000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `idea_to_production_steps` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ec38351e7aae7c1eb1bbf782da34f4f","location":{"path":"app/presenters/conversational_development_index/metric_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project_presenter.rb` has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d892daae824d8e78fe2a0b68c288acda","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2092800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `default_view` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d66dbcb27efcacaf84388d8cfc5f690f","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":80}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `readme_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c40df23b551a8abe9f2d5830edfbf472","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":221,"end":231}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autodevops_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e4902e11edd6de01b81f9a61f5d9d7b","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":275,"end":285}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"119e536f7905363201fb67bbdcd65824","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":287,"end":299}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectPresenter` has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"174173017516e33835d52eb7c5513209","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notification_service.rb` has 356 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69e4d6c40c4449fefd31aa10ca6d0d74","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":550}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2726400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `NotificationService` has 57 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f69a1b203ea4d5900672119cebb81b66","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":550}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"40698d762fba8b2aa8a60c141d6d8790","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_create_group?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b75b73bf2d690e5a17c2abe284491440","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_allowed_transfer` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b1a41885cc0a6ac544248d54c07e1636","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4bb4279e0d059ae00152e8bdf1ea798d","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_operation_id` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e02445fcf7469e25e1790f6de102578e","location":{"path":"app/services/clusters/gcp/provision_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee86b571c5fd71a16cf372ae35959a1d","location":{"path":"app/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7bf557578299a5ba915c32a04c77757","location":{"path":"app/services/gravatar_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `valid_visibility_level_change?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5663649284b422de3ee165079f02580a","location":{"path":"app/services/concerns/update_visibility_level.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":16}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e2214a2c7403de3b6b130ef6a8ae0e7","location":{"path":"app/services/labels/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"889d22762e16d3366a67e51333a2ca58","location":{"path":"app/services/labels/promote_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83f2800751c8e1fc38441feba44838e9","location":{"path":"app/services/notes/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64400ce10f6b24c336dc2c14dc7631e5","location":{"path":"app/services/notes/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"55c1155f35f19aeab86111aa747bcdef","location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9350f7f8937ed59a3c058c18876a72fc","location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `add_commits` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb5157bfd09a812f4b9e9e59faa9bd43","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_status` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b2b9c2adcef9eef8232ca3fabba5213","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":214,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_branch` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d01b8c3144cf8ecd33ca899268167ba5","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":370,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_branch_presence` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcdc7164fbd2b97a6ffca4f6dc2e0e44","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":390,"end":390}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `system_note_service.rb` has 269 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d114264549f2dceede46ea914a3550c","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":679}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1473600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `change_time_spent` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c81cb9f69e1de7b23d6f18ba82533d3","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":181,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cross_reference_disallowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf012be1a6a2e48dd333008fe9d0d152","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":455,"end":461}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `existing_commit_summary` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e510f603309baf5e0cb54ad77970a75","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":637,"end":659}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_mention_todos` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8a610af9d7608ea64f58ba654367d763","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":273,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `attributes_for_todo` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22c5b886bc2bcef31fd1446dabf42446","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":310,"end":310}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `TodoService` has 43 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"888b933ca386de89d1c664deed0728bd","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":357}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcfd0e3ea01c9694d57bfccaa03838e6","location":{"path":"app/services/verify_pages_domain_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d473aafcb22747b52b1f62e820f2074d","location":{"path":"app/services/create_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a39c0c805730f76077d4c41f5a49ab0","location":{"path":"app/services/todos/destroy/entity_leave_service.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd806bba9fb1ffe1bffc98d5b313f431","location":{"path":"app/services/todos/destroy/private_features_service.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"669e705b9b727535b65aa70c23908b8a","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable/bulk_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fa059d9d5e3d40934b6d454456a29e17","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_registry_access` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a9f93af474354f18c131c4a6f33ce74","location":{"path":"app/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_repository_access` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2612abf7127bdfa9f619c175cf5d2cc","location":{"path":"app/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7189b60fb2402fbb02818934986a95e8","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/overwrite_project_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"961ae326b78bf20ee97acef0cec52327","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_create_actions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e38e4c0872ce60d2ba85c11448b4522b","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save_project_and_import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49a616d751623502896fe1bf01ddc263","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"175fda5eebf084d959ea97dbc7ddba89","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4406c9c51c68a677aea6fc1c46031379"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `propagate_projects_with_template` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"293ec445efe1987a7ed4d749d241b1c9","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/propagate_service_template.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a2218c0712e897508cb29f687ddbb15","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attempt_repositories_rollback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06f3aaf8a1f066c4e7933483e129d710","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_repository_to_project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0129f188de75c26a852812d70994f671","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_repository` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7dc266875c644d2161df4f52854509a","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `download_lfs_objects` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e22b343575e9881c97f2271bcd97f948","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7bc52f032ae36171f9038ca564b8725f","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3753f60f8dc5d9fdb996971cbdec0ee","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_zip_archive!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe7709a469edc64e95ec098c80aa4d9e","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `UpdatePagesService` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7d865dc59fc4a03d279c1c19c89a168","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":191}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_as_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"78f7382b2da989274c44cca4dd67b726","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/autocomplete_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ecc06d47c5ab14de0497085a390276e9","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f166c36283c89cda2c2d1b400fc83d9c","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8619477bd476b8e6c20c420edaafa603","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eab5a0a1e19f69711efa955efe37831a","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1014f2a5df19a7195983026335ef76c","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23b22fd0746b04d1cdb84c038d084b5b","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0543ffb09bae340f0c5077ae46b7cdcc","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_download_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"896cabbb6ed77bf3c709bb312f23a6fb","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfsconfig_endpoint_uri` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ab48443c563d169a420e80faa5c91bf8","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d7377f3f82a92babb9d1d653fb3a6c0","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/unlink_fork_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notification_recipient_service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"04116f97d81f75dc8b45ce0a5811fa81","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":384}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc4e88abd84c5b4832ac272b050f5372","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":257,"end":295}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Base` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"27695a9b55119263d5fc023bfb91d6e3","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6cc1d79d478940cb6d6b9ceed02cb6e6","location":{"path":"app/services/users/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute_without_lease` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67cb8ef6b0457ad00d8347bcbe3ff3f7","location":{"path":"app/services/users/refresh_authorized_projects_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_authorizations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6e70e1ba1ea2f084af1fff74047fe8d9","location":{"path":"app/services/users/refresh_authorized_projects_service.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9165689bde9f912aa84f6f518e598da","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_user_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"830b5807353157bd5e183aad25f2b282","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `admin_create_params` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe5ddceb25aafe04827303d1f6d564b4","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5bc79f55d7e462657e85385bf64c461b","location":{"path":"app/services/submit_usage_ping_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eff6af7a39548e896b0c36625e41edfa","location":{"path":"app/services/validate_new_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f26b8395f9bebcbbe601568ab87f1dac","location":{"path":"app/services/tags/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009acc0cc8f2cad1eb48f996869cd8b3","location":{"path":"app/services/tags/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `close_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"268f126190d57eeaaded69cfb25897c3","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/close_service.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff12a5753d6bee667c95cfbc92416e03","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b14e45d1c64f39d6eedb20d84843741","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_assignee` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5691687cb00f6fd194e603429807185a","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1a9702d3dc815e8d64756d8fb212f9b3","location":{"path":"app/services/web_hook_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d9ca5643eb0d67f71faf5371f5ae764","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/create_pipeline_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b8c02fe4ca7afa344ed38920cbc647e3","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/retry_pipeline_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc2e58626fb38ae2a635ad7504d1369f","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/stop_environments_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"617800a52fa424a1bcea1ed6a62b6793","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/register_job_service.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3c427dfa0dd24ca8d0170b6247260b87","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/register_job_service.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_label_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d322faf3023b3e313c8abe2020cf59af","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"139f887d96d46ca70a22e378422f8bc7","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuableBaseService` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"906133099e33d0679f4b8c65cc1eef9b","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":319}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009042d6d3df2763254c61f2b3d8536c","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_event_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"181f03475858936500cb1903a2981922","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_event_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"58fb30a590bb73d7a7c014c15cff2f61","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build_event_data` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb1f235466d69ba0f51ae5082e6ccd1b","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `include_any_scope?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c3b269346955ff77f7af249761778c5f","location":{"path":"app/services/access_token_validation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b944cb228f06d17cfab396e042f46404","location":{"path":"app/services/create_deployment_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a911c4e00c978f2c3dee8a80d2b123c","location":{"path":"app/services/members/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e17107f5166483e06d9a3aa43ce4057","location":{"path":"app/services/delete_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_be_resolved_in_ui?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"303b72ed1619302f77225ae41471638d","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/conflicts/list_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `reload_merge_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a105139484033c8e7ced10c6ce36e8db","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/refresh_service.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_new_commits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"851ed172a4510d8303c8caf10c7c09e1","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/refresh_service.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":141}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trigger` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8627834675a31ad536bf412edaafd7e7","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/merge_when_pipeline_succeeds_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cd7f00168c6c916f0dc7075f0ca3349","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/merge_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35e1a81d921bd211a80412b3021d8f1f","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/create_from_issue_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"629d86725d56fa929caf501972ac7cf2","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":92,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BuildService` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0955c9bbce7bc1720631a8dc579bbf5f","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e605b474bb1fb7b66f5bfbaf51d3c6d","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/get_urls_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cefad5ecb48fbecc8f4fa6ba026659f8","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db391ef0b97408393fd716be0c7356dd","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `commit_status_merge_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"784a58094574fa35608fca082c2548e7","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `interpret_service.rb` has 596 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83735b0b7c1f8d22c40f49e709c57e70","location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":700}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6182400,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b08fd2ee935cfed15e0505bb9af417b4","location":{"path":"app/services/discussions/update_diff_position_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcb90a6db168562206b2356716e752b6","location":{"path":"app/services/git_push_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b2781e6841d5d63745094c685fcd1e8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/groups/children_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3169a6c4ee72f03a1318dedbed6b40ff","location":{"path":"app/controllers/groups/group_members_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `failure_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3605869f669f4cb85ba66bdd5b04c7a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `omniauth_flow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8cf6a8a0fd40eb5ff273cc6dba558403","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":95}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sign_in_user_flow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e780968a46460e3b3fe11a34ddfc0c00","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `OmniauthCallbacksController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af6b190bf330da08acbe854817a6812f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `impersonate` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f01a1ec9614ccf1b226a3e42206b203b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af47e69f6ee053a6f226de336934f214","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `UsersController` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb3ecebd549737d88ffb4ea7b2d02d16","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":230}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d5e93c6a88076ccc249e69590f05f53","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/system_info_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6c80ea5d1d0a024abdc38fba56cb8435","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/uploads_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `send_blob` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfa9da0619389a51f42df3b51bf5c65c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/sends_blob.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `leave` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f6860cf601d992df6f0af95d95748a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/membership_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `set_issuables_index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f415a6c750063cabd8f90d48e98e5eb0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_with_two_factor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36f3a297fab9a3ef0e526b7f851741b2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/authenticates_with_two_factor.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `safe_redirect_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36420be74fc50045ef291eb40a71bb77","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/internal_redirect.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `safe_redirect_path_for_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d5b751dbd9dd362815b574f1cb52225a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/internal_redirect.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"273ea02f6c72cced154034c12207d3f1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_discussion_html` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62bc37c3eb9f037889edcbe39ef53aa6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":148,"end":174}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"573f594e00ed6b29987ce9e763457833","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":239,"end":256}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `note_json` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2572ca1fa7eb27c9668322b7a098f02a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `recaptcha_check_with_fallback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5ab9c6deb983a187870f912e14afaea","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/spammable_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"832aa36f617c6cce4927e6c8b561ce98","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_flash_notice` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"89030f5b74776bb2425f95279fdd5b7d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `final_success_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"afb1305c0c32730e0b027be235b174a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_commit` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eaa2bdf0bf7bb61da1f37f4031392e35","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `send_upload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfa021a786ee32f97584fecedce60cde","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfs_check_access!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46d5167d71a5e6a69a9a236086347aed","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/lfs_request.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"905d81937e68b3931dad7416dc6ef9a6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"20b781fcddc55e961f42441c445d70d8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/github_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `GithubController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ab20d51ced6ac78aa49e0f6de0af0ac0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/github_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":132}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_or_create_namespace` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f80525d40e648a6d7ea2229b2cb74ae","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/base_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d4ab07c39a5534d15b7443e37a7a235","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_server_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_import_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"da2d51f606c44590f847c4640444ac5b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_server_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `callback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3c9e710a6531242212414756cccfe915","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/google_code_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_captcha` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de5a9e305854d86a525c3be0d27eaf6d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `auto_sign_in_with_provider` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f619928e9105c1311e52540b45817001","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":167,"end":186}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `SessionsController` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca547cff8dfcb4f2bb32febd07c3a8b9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44af899cceadececa5fb2d6343c42fb8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/registrations_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07120d763a5a37d3563d108da7618fc2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/snippets_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19fe68118b5b1cf2a9c1bfef20064546","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/wikis_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4754ebccd6eb3ba307dee978dd12dde8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/wikis_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_requests_controller.rb` has 265 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed0fbac1699084d99f2798b9ff54b642","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1416000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6d989eecff0a311d8a4126b524b3d54","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"043aac3b7446fd75e17405d975137865","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":123,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_environments_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46e544b6af20509fb22aa245f36e853b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":242}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c7d0579b3b6ee7f277ab6932678009d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":285,"end":319}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestsController` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b062a438177acc72625495d3cbfaa77c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3c966096d2b12e85a670db7911707b8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ci_environments_status` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5b7f8ffd1531062cbb97dd163687759","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":242}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `set_commits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e6d95cec8ea5cbbfb499acf2d8c47bb9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `archive` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"24b42f263d62dd73163666f08a5dab84","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/repositories_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"48f2140ee4baa6d602990f3cd3a4e3bd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b53414d925313d554a03dbde87a17b1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aeab90a0370c820e728a3abfbc25b413","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/git_http_client_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59245dcb34ab6bc8f9698502300494c2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/mirrors_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `resolve` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"43486b045d4b1186318cfc251852d98f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unresolve` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"687318ee4eb16a33452c1f37b2c881a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31c48fb29d257a60073d2b38d6e1cb4d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/forks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `index` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a118caadbf010e6edb81311d4382716d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3abec97b27020fca915a84ac93bc67d6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/imports_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4da2f2dd27d4fd213b9f9f2f1a5cd41f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/group_links_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `service_test_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bca34a40fb26a815c60df6fd1e7dba51","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/services_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"519adc463f2dd3de5cb94580d7f50383","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/deployments_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `additional_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4f6fc892643a150dc844973ad4d976","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/deployments_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_match_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07c854b446b4087e5ee7892172f74ee7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":133,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `blob` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6f7a07f247048d784135038dce26244","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":151,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `editor_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfcc7b49429c64315cf6da835ec8bede","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BlobController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c1e63be99f08c204815ffecf3dd4b66c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":284}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"979438a3332d8f5f08717dc86472299b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/tree_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"806fa8153a8d1eb022e92afcd4601d91","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/tree_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4f02dd301b3eeb842d85c37f20bae2e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/jobs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":126,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `JobsController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6f969a368940183e4fce1acd28147f56","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/jobs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_merge_request_diff_compare` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91ff93d1ec72c5ce3a260ca7bb0355a1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests/diffs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `download_objects!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b7b7331d3cec46b88359e5648ed2f9a2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/lfs_api_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ClustersController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"964ab09026b9448f413a95a5f6094e09","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":222}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `move` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ae70ac550f5ace969dc34ad430e1a506","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/issues_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuesController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"09358857b8d0a59b5b0f1efabe1eb312","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/issues_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_root_container_repository!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a31d8c82827ad31ea06cbe929b5bcb9e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_keys` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e98b2fc794e033c8a48c3ee0becb6ada","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/keys_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7fac5d70e69bf9664ceb8d865c808fa2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/two_factor_auths_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"053f896df50c58d1c5a7f874e0cf72c3","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/two_factor_auths_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `new` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17c6af74d7968b2ff43b8ab9795a3e8a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/oauth/authorizations_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects_controller.rb` has 328 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed6bb55f0c75667bbb0ec51d3c2664cf","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2323200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `refs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4477c3a607082b3d28aae895558786dd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":274}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_landing_page` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"278be4b0b74df103253b6e3205fb8a62","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":281,"end":298}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectsController` has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8090aa2673614a81e71589f7753eff30","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `project_params_attributes` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2fdc2a483f87578ca62a61a751d113d7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":331,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_check_results` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba1563517e02434643d39267194f528e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/health_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f7c994d83ef228aa163c05179f06d2fd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/help_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `clean_path_info` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5db34152511808356524914b64cf554b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/help_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `application_controller.rb` has 341 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f029769395ddcac92c2b8d2ca3b05b28","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":465}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2510400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ldap_security_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"523cc3bb278c788d5848949c8c3dead7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":262,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enforce_terms!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d14876e741b595110a644395f1230e14","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ApplicationController` has 53 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d63945970dce3ed1ef2b7634b214a4e9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":465}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4500000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `users_select_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a108342e6dd48ba76731363b84661eaf","location":{"path":"app/helpers/selects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `users_select_data_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8bad651f6dba343e0468fd0003dd784","location":{"path":"app/helpers/selects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show_last_push_widget?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f5475afeb1122f3cfa25ac5955cbb27","location":{"path":"app/helpers/application_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `visible_attributes` has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17f189b8fca7fc3b1f8a420a4bcbda19","location":{"path":"app/helpers/application_settings_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":266}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2856000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `toggle_award_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d69f1bff0994f6e3441f85f3f11d5bbe","location":{"path":"app/helpers/award_emoji_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `page_gutter_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e65e525a4333beebdf83e031e767ef28","location":{"path":"app/helpers/nav_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_header_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f16a544d112fad89ba71d21c6d5db6a3","location":{"path":"app/helpers/nav_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_match_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b869dd8c4eaef5740ed1f255a8f1fbf1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/diff_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parallel_diff_discussions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ca093d3db0a23030593eb120a3b43fd","location":{"path":"app/helpers/diff_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `active_nav_link?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a16ad6a8f13c9288d42920124805df7f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/tab_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1c1f76f6143eff8d1d22a334a235fd12","location":{"path":"app/helpers/users_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `namespaces_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7abb679aa0b2ea21e01c24880d3bf77c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `options_for_group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e8e66fbb82bdafdc25047aa1524869b","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `namespaces_options` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1da7571d4cd35e4edcc84ea6e21ec17","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submodule_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"592e98a3099ca8bf38ff5b45bcb0dffb","location":{"path":"app/helpers/submodule_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `submodule_links` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c06e0c3ec596b1cdfd2de6f634cd6b86","location":{"path":"app/helpers/submodule_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_member_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bba34164517c03c61579ce09b9d98bb9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/members_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `chunk_snippet` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de18ceb549965f7ea862a8c0dc960bea","location":{"path":"app/helpers/snippets_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":105}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_filter_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d39f54cf4cda251c101014a6f4c7244","location":{"path":"app/helpers/labels_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `label_status_tooltip` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64c9182b39df4fa2de87d8d55c2d2cbc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/labels_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":216,"end":222}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `event_feed_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ae609cca64a854e8b692dd72db01e13","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `event_feed_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f99a06ad5d757ef02870ca23d95676bc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `push_event_feed_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a4c5fb26657f91ff277b7ef0d13c32d","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `discussion_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8fcc6a280f6df449c018435d3f92438","location":{"path":"app/helpers/notes_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `clipboard_button` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c29991b281e121dc435a356a600e4e1e","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_item_with_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d5076e20cc132338854d62653cd1df8","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `clipboard_button` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97e66a0f68fa32b384f734ea55e5e044","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4267997c227f431d5c46888b32748d75","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_toggle` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a5dbb87125de6801bd8e3f421ea8d82","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `dropdown_tag` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5365287d8861b3ecac3eb84417018a2b","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sprite_icon` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b288e014419e55f1aa86631629c79889","location":{"path":"app/helpers/icons_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `file_type_icon_class` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ddea2c28588a85667f5b5399507ff46","location":{"path":"app/helpers/icons_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":109,"end":151}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `commit_action_link` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8657821ad7a6c0ec4e6398a6aee36f9c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/commits_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":181}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `todo_target_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d03a4561eaff01e66db146018ad0c969","location":{"path":"app/helpers/todos_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `todo_due_date` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db4163fb6bc594c0c7f5188d10a94d61","location":{"path":"app/helpers/todos_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":141,"end":160}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `url_for_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b77357907fc65f32d6adebdec5c99e74","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issues_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `path_breadcrumbs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"309df9fc4689b2f5fb71f6534a5efd03","location":{"path":"app/helpers/tree_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":121}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `edit_fork_button_tag` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2b6c57301b36358581b2491652866c44","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":302}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `edit_button_tag` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"723d5e25e5499349ff424fa5046927f1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":318}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `modify_file_button` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b6850840a5430937e584328e518311d","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `blob_raw_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b8466fa1a816b27c99638fe228016597","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":131}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `edit_button_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93c71a130633cfcebe91bcda32798413","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects_helper.rb` has 438 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a3d8d9970bc1e29fb6cf0845a8963a35","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":555}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3907200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `link_to_member` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"92e14b6f78cd2026911faaf78829ba53","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ebe86c74e8aaea024bada46109f4e9a","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_project_nav_tabs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4c2cc0402179e15ec7cff7acf71f67","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":266,"end":300}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disallowed_project_visibility_level_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cde9c43b6e33582ebc01be9dcc6b0cc6","location":{"path":"app/helpers/visibility_level_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disallowed_group_visibility_level_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c964b53a81590235d500b10d64921ffc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/visibility_level_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":128}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_controller_bundle_tags` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1915400e4cdf8101f80cf09fcaa41a8","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_entrypoint_paths` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2059057b0a4c8c172104d3a69b6d33a1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_public_host` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5187936b625c537cc83fe49f935245ac","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_class_for_state` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9f98077e679dcc8bdc4adbc9fc03e111","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_time_for` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e9f0e967afa3a497b80340cf11b095e","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":122,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_date_range` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4843496f3de8ac4a890951c97d469064","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":181,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `share_with_group_lock_help_text` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff00375205d66e384de0e3f33ec7d0d7","location":{"path":"app/helpers/groups_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `group_title_link` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"98657f045e5336754e6eae56e789418f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/groups_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":141,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ci_icon_for_status` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c3efeba2a30134025307449a05b2f77","location":{"path":"app/helpers/ci_status_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `sorting_helper.rb` has 302 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01923968066dde38b1a1f78557e3aa84","location":{"path":"app/helpers/sorting_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1948800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `link_to_html` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a4d4827db929df3ce6e16fb4d0b9522","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `first_line_in_markdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a45a636cd6cfd627a9b9cb575482d665","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_wiki_content` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f59f576a0875d3e1b3150c35d4244f1f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `markup_unsafe` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f734634b0f84e17e369619da7591cc9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":166}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncate_visible` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7de1befc5006684b8aac21b36b5a2eee","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":229}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncate_if_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c65f7114f8bc0ff0c40ba17a721dc4e7","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":234,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issuables_helper.rb` has 354 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0534175d956cb265e089add14a703e9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2697600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `multi_label_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6f2aa839b3380e86377b58408fcfa15","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_labels_tooltip` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ed7317a98ede04c4a1cde7f6af1871c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":208,"end":219}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_todo_button_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"382bc77616cd06810f3d2112c8460240","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":381,"end":395}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project_policy.rb` has 333 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"61f7a144aa6cdf7e965d3130c52aacc3","location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":434}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2395200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remaining_days_in_words` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db6e21e4091f24644db9efa04f03f5f2","location":{"path":"app/serializers/entity_date_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe3dd187f741789f765000b6e08c77bf","location":{"path":"app/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":260}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `reassigned_issue_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e2a4c8e9b4b5584a258cdc21bf1779b","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `relabeled_issue_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eccd65b7da076099478491ce5ffd1bcd","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issue_status_changed_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d347450b4f4fa27b8d847a4e282b8f2","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issue_moved_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1fb6126b5a4051ae7af19c5fd1ea1ef","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `reassigned_merge_request_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bd5f4e62d9db3075aa99840c56f1dc3","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `relabeled_merge_request_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4fbe646413819b74d51d11132d24f75","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `merge_request_status_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c39ada600f20e34ac7bc271aaa17a489","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `NotifyPreview` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ad28a90a453e7f0892e2fa27ca7dd74","location":{"path":"app/mailers/previews/notify_preview.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ae09aa8f81cc51243569392f706dea8b","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_branch_updates` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2efa6a64aab186fa6e22c887b82c2da8","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_commits` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bda830a07ed575bd9c98deb67e6efa84","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_commits_count` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe8fcb808f2da3f31174330b3b8e8d2f","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":113,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `process_commit_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0cbd58f4d824762ee08cbe8394a955be","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `close_issues` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ddd5587d752e08728eca56e8b842057","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00fda5cf89ca2d06f32e73e5948d2d96","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b2d21175bd49ce0560d00b41a5d4b105","location":{"path":"app/workers/emails_on_push_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21b177b9c8aab67c1dd18ac4736d07e0","location":{"path":"app/workers/emails_on_push_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1392000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc6bfd63748977ec6b13ad1bcd32f3e0","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_import_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac08a8c45d58e80f3f9f0e821af8c678","location":{"path":"app/workers/create_pipeline_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sanity_check!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e3c40adf8befa842892c33a2ef33ef6","location":{"path":"app/workers/object_storage/migrate_uploads_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5767377fdd633dc52d45bb5edaf792ad","location":{"path":"app/workers/object_storage/background_move_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"873b9f464ca14204612b7168bd6cd51a","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_update_remote_mirror_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform_repository_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c569f618db6dab9061d1c9a4fbd00161","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_check/batch_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fb73a85eb279eea1e916d045d1752c0b","location":{"path":"app/workers/update_merge_requests_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c731770fbe34f3e5817178bf1c1c9c2","location":{"path":"app/workers/post_receive.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_project_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcfa21f106c7ddc7d59ef6a69ed225a5","location":{"path":"app/workers/post_receive.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90ee5638594e38ee879df3d7b6670837","location":{"path":"app/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c91f311ed659a5cf472f55294f93721e","location":{"path":"app/workers/project_migrate_hashed_storage_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_failure` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ea43d53b1207bf05223f6e3378b7622f","location":{"path":"app/workers/email_receiver_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fb063b327d5645323a0adeb4a475ab88","location":{"path":"app/workers/create_gpg_signature_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90474c7bc130abea03bc8b0c1a6d72e3","location":{"path":"app/finders/concerns/finder_with_cross_project_access.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_due_date` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7cd7e8d0b5f825ced9cce3fd0921f8b","location":{"path":"app/finders/issues_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `all_groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9450c1e48d60393e153d88597dff24f6","location":{"path":"app/finders/groups_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"be7b1d323697075c6c41a353ae096f3b","location":{"path":"app/finders/environments_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"caa84d8a4abdc89470c9734cc20f668b","location":{"path":"app/finders/environments_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issuable_finder.rb` has 326 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a0da380c5a294186d2f8b47c7dbbefc2","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2294400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestones` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"10f2a889ce05a62411b22bd93f5cc5fb","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":195,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_milestone` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b5705f5f9e383902a98d61545a61a9f","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":432,"end":447}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuableFinder` has 47 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"863953770234ecee39c26f4a376fd96f","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `target` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"10931dd4f683d88c8163ae49517c9ab8","location":{"path":"app/finders/notes_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_archived` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8a0163155f7d44abda52664f1aeec277","location":{"path":"app/finders/projects_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `label_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8efea533e852a1ae66e134916ddee3ed","location":{"path":"app/finders/labels_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcae9d4bea82b824bf3281aee3585c28","location":{"path":"app/finders/labels_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b10747a7f6c51031eb2aec28a84ab64","location":{"path":"app/finders/autocomplete/users_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `distinct_on` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"684bb4005fc7ad31c75a6725f7cc9bb4","location":{"path":"app/finders/members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `TodosFinder` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bda816f835a5b1d9557e5018542c8d40","location":{"path":"app/finders/todos_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":195}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2764263922dc65629ac261e7b22a4aaa","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_break_from_strong_memoize.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3d826dd296b41ed52a3d279711f08c1","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/reversible_add_column_with_default.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c2b352ab3b2b95bfd273eed48b0abde","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/update_column_in_batches.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ca44c40f4350122f1d014c4832b0903","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/update_large_table.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"259f2282957271f68f06320d6e9c9304","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_reference.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_def` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1eade1345b7999362c94ffdd69c9abe5","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_index.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2957b0117eb58305df4d1c4f628f6e22","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_concurrent_index.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a265e4d95fda1c51004e6b280d4faa62","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/hash_index.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4642fe2fb8caa127e076b834679b38c7","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_column.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53f08cb9ea1aded1c4867d5ec20513e1","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/datetime.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_def` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33c826c076b3d604191dc285ae1c197f","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_column.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f6ab7199493398668d2f7fb4ae05a45","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/safer_boolean_column.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d3a133fdd5733e12d588c313215673c","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_concurrent_index.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60e29c1a431f0815adefc57a3daa815a","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_return_from_blocks.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parent_blocks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf710c1583fafaba0fb4a8d7507199ca","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_return_from_blocks.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac6a847fc937c343670c7deedadaa245","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_all_send_nodes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86036271965f234231993a45bdebb14d","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3468ff5bbfe02d60179b461cee64dcd2","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6cd42fcfb267a05384d5c43432583d9","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_if` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c31d398a0e65e6ad5bf772ffbe612d27","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autocorrect` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6790fd3dafb4732df58459faaaee4a86","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83f3ce0952418f2d18756e7f01d3f37e","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/project_path_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/project_path_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"16132947f8a9d308be379b39b9a5d3e6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00f629cf63f892026e01afc3ea1f7651","location":{"path":"qa/qa/scenario/test/sanity/selectors.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `configure!` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"024a3eec035772b027f91725d6217728","location":{"path":"qa/qa/runtime/browser.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5bc236abe446161666817def77f8ddf","location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6f04a78d84c195424103bc166feb302","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/repository/push.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0619d32fe486fa8cd5d32a978dbba114","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/repository/push.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3806fbbd18c151ecd8c0b6a777c6eafd","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/kubernetes_cluster.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a68225ad27f7d73dc48ba5138c97cc4","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/kubernetes_cluster.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"455a528019b993508c00252ac2356d13","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/branch.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c20ae555f1495416940ef8126556a4b","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/branch.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sign_in_using_credentials` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf2fda789a392298297395e24cd69833","location":{"path":"qa/qa/page/main/login.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expand_section` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"403c8764d8456908ed9eeef4e0044633","location":{"path":"qa/qa/page/settings/common.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f47da27b9c8ebadc35daab5ecdfacbd","location":{"path":"qa/qa/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Base` has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e990b96533b4c82f0e6c7290f79ea42e","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/base.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":330}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/condition.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"453a21507c9d4e6b09338d4ea74a2cb6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9109da1712e5180769d6dee88e01ab4b","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `steps_by_score` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c728761c8bd550bb676d5ac29cc54f2c","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `steps_by_score` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fda7518f9492e598aeaa14084a16fcad","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `flattened` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"938e199f4acb9d23e67b122acf7df125","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/step.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e8ff80c1013b45a887d5b05aebda0a6d","location":{"path":"lib/mattermost/session.rb","lines":{"begin":100,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Session` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6bc576e4f2b4e33eeb24fbd9a4756e0","location":{"path":"lib/mattermost/session.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":185}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `from_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8708d87b45e03dda5cf801ba3c8b4ae8","location":{"path":"lib/uploaded_file.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `object_link_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d75625eef2a0bac64c81e6a99b470c7","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/merge_request_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4a7914b17bf2c4568c886ae0510580a","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/issuable_state_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c21517ccaabda5807f34857c92c02c20","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/emoji_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b2ff3f6e59ccd27a3e8df6e92792289","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/gollum_tags_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_relative_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1fc007ca58af10483040ad6c3acafc7b","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d11bc0fb07cb93de54e50ca187a470c","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/inline_diff_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"229de514760543ff1eae907b8931ae4a","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2adb2780e68c3edecbf3243959331bc","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":99,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `object_link_filter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"756d39528c96fdea1b53fc02cd2f1b54","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":204}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `AbstractReferenceFilter` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf8591fc0f7db3df80a7dd6204670584","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":359}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `call` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"158c3e7c7c151f7461c460b58c8eb7fb","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":99,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `object_link_filter` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cce139d64bf42a05629c35156d98c24b","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":204}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f009def1da08a1c0910203aacb888646","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e19e0b6d7127e7778817e23a5c2202a6","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/external_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight_node` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9dc3f1809c63dc39b3c7b301b2c8b0a8","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/syntax_highlight_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0228be52a5d55a59f39144f901ba3de8","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_link_filter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e1a29dd5f3f29173136fead3b7feacff","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c56c41f7c09938431d527c9d84ee464c","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23c5be476e6cfabb3f50b8995a21481e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":67}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autolink_match` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"63ef57bb6d5d4556a6d292a19e1eb7aa","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_unsafe_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"578c89c0c495a9f9912ae5425a9baf35","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/sanitization_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_unsafe_table_style` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"66ae1f700aade40e1b93928de1809522","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/sanitization_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_link_attr` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe0e7a59ae612e2391ff8956ece5a37e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/absolute_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91ceeacf382258ddf799f7e8df323086","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/commit_trailers_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `link_to_user` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2cae91969679378626a39ee56d06c378","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/commit_trailers_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/math_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":400000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"c132e79b1733f1ef2e4fba2f07f29935"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"88347949c1ff362bde8f0c3f4fe03dc2","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/table_of_contents_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_parent` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b3d0438ee7565d4ad0316ba6f05a9baf","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/table_of_contents_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `nodes_visible_to_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c851d1fc927d9308df218d02f42fde99","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/user_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `nodes_user_can_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bfa5e9970213f7ef43f0e22780710fb3","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/user_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `grouped_objects_for_nodes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56d2576cd012b6e37a94c3cac839a5fd","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BaseParser` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3b65d4312cddf7542466b907246e6568","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":255}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_collection_render` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86955f7d246e45efcedaab9abac1b39e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/renderer.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_nodes_at_beginning` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"575e435b81c0cb589731931503f3f7ef","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/querying.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1435f7fb2485ddc0076596fa851b5e1","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_validity!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4c0eea681bcd3ea73ab99bdeb9992c52","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ad97d789c0a7bb2c49b85af370fa1cb","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects.rb` has 419 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de2195ccf1e60f3a00e250b69809f314","location":{"path":"lib/api/projects.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":513}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3633600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `apply_filters` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d37733ec13b40a7294cb95cca30d7c0","location":{"path":"lib/api/projects.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `entities.rb` has 1174 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"14ca44a7292f309674c3e6bf5668d68a","location":{"path":"lib/api/entities.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1469}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":14505600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_note` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5bdd6d096b03346b779bae1a47c5df19","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers/notes_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_job!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c2df515fd3e4e567e5c43ce34122ebc","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_runners` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8fe97bd7f7ff40f6f347505c5401de55","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":163,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_show_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"678c4afecdf242daef2608fb52f16121","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":184,"end":188}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_delete_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"229dc324c7b4cd0754d3f429d0efa489","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":196,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_enable_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fdde7223cb136c51a33619a48b7e10e9","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":203,"end":210}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issues.rb` has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49d5eae8f5a9b7ef20af4a226580c9fb","location":{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":332}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1430400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_builds` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b03e3d209e73511af90d54684b559d3a","location":{"path":"lib/api/jobs.rb","lines":{"begin":176,"end":185}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `list_milestones_for` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8e051bd18be2af43510bfc934382e630","location":{"path":"lib/api/milestone_responses.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_file_vars!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4be22423f2ecad963ae6b37b42f43510","location":{"path":"lib/api/files.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_blob_vars!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e73cbaada1130cabaf0dfa4c08f70656","location":{"path":"lib/api/repositories.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `services.rb` has 836 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68db3252fd8eaa9d286783dcd5099377","location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":864}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":9638400,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `runner.rb` has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e11149dffed6dc2e322c584638327bf","location":{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":316}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1430400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_requests.rb` has 322 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3de9fe3d6f81552276ac816a0f052fb7","location":{"path":"lib/api/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":398}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2236800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_merge_request_errors!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b0820e7ae582cfc463b18401dc7dfd6","location":{"path":"lib/api/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":145,"end":159}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `helpers.rb` has 381 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5db68c679d275d3963e0f9660988e103","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":533}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3086400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attributes_for_keys` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"63712b203f7a63b38bcb9eea53c3001d","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":289,"end":299}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_finder_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"268f87eb93bd855d1807610fcddd6efe","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":408,"end":420}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `present_carrierwave_file!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"360f85bdb8a06a280a62224143731f15","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":440,"end":452}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sudo!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddabeb34a3b3e3067c6b88323ce10dcc","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":468,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `users.rb` has 652 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"da0cb2b4e7ad1056fa1e4f7a0fc774d7","location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":837}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6988800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eea17dfbc1a8fa0837c83d51e2708400","location":{"path":"lib/api/groups.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `inject_rblineprof` has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"16157b2c336822ada397c30b37d0e63b","location":{"path":"lib/peek/rblineprof/custom_controller_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `inject_rblineprof` has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9665938c091b2575d937990fbc609dac","location":{"path":"lib/peek/rblineprof/custom_controller_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1488000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `flatten_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3acab7e81bc6f21925b3944dc13c9d25","location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/representation/comment.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_errors!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5656af648a8148a4747d9750b93c8a0c","location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/connection.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_ref` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b8bde6183c235753993662c791c5f50","location":{"path":"lib/extracts_path.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_ref_vars` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"994b000ce7697f00c9d2fdef6d5f219c","location":{"path":"lib/extracts_path.rb","lines":{"begin":108,"end":133}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `gitaly_configuration_toml` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7ce1b00e1e01659ed25ab9357f9d47d7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/setup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_with_user_password` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0212b6bdb5ef9f95aaaad8df3d25a15a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rate_limit!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18c084f7a7640dd9934777afe795d6e1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `service_request_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcdcb167117e9fbdc60bcccfa8c52ce9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":128}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `deploy_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3349988ec83e4933b92c3a7e3824cc58","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":185,"end":199}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfs_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f1a1535569de597558d429c01457d5e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":202,"end":228}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_access_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e8fcdca34d7247788de08e6051143d2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":245}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `setup_subscribers` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85ca5972d830d83ef927532dcf66122f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/performance_bar/peek_query_tracker.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fields` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dbfd2a1c630915fc2b4befaca081c456","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/issue_base.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"57bd6ed972d21a41e82e376f51d7a76e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/base.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `text` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0fea0819cd1d628d704dab5f9f56ae5c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/issue_show.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `file.rb` has 255 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcd7afc2511311acf93e48f89b257ee8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":356}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `simple_viewer_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"455a703cf96823be99c475db08de0c9f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":311,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `viewer_class_from` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cae1cebb92d35a5859ef229108d1e4c1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":345,"end":353}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `File` has 54 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4872155d7a8ab149e4dbfdd0a34d314f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `simple_viewer_class` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c663249a7eb69d79d53815c02da1287e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":311,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62d56326c2f46a050e8a9f1219488e25","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/line.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":10}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Position` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44aef8e9a5055d83b7605ef01a8ffcd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":150}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"922e6aee35a311a79f1043b07ee7064d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/highlight.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b41f2627f4109bdc5b74287cf3ba0d21","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/highlight.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parallelize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"631e96ad1ef01b07245ee2a542d76275","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parallel_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parallelize` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c801b9d4ce1a0b15a92b13570e4b4a73","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parallel_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_stats_collection` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1edfc550eecbd5daa471adab0ab3385","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/base.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bfc88a6b4fdafecdb4881ebd0a709e90","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parse` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d81f9668924e2328ae1d3b978012b2e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"678e46609976cce578070c879cdeaa09","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_added_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d3253565d5f52fdc8e227a610a4ba02","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":127}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_removed_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a2345cd4720ceb59ce0efdf2c931d70","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_unchanged_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68d033636c672cf93801ba4a440a9b10","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":160,"end":199}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `map_line_number` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc329e8839fe1c0b24ddd3dbaa5b8485","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/line_mapper.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `popen_with_detail` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f3016518aa9a963248a02cac889fd75","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/popen.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `request_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7f577fa9ce2f42e5f27aac8db514fe3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cache/request_cache.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `store_in_cache_if_needed` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"baa77c71d04626f49bd5c1e57a0e2ca9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cache/ci/project_pipeline_status.rb","lines":{"begin":92,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `aggregate_rblineprof` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c969b511dec60cc5ae82a493581e987","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sherlock/line_profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `subscribe_to_active_record` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb47c9a23a0a444f0c02f2ce82101c23","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sherlock/transaction.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":96}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_keys_not_found_in_db` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"110e16cf8bc4b13203ae16707be71f9e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/shell.rb","lines":{"begin":229,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Shell` has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9bb914cee67608b26add7bcc4f81b00b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/shell.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":445}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `bulk_insert` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46738c8e24da7d644d4613d9605d7262","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":167,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f71d3611436ba9323475933db3b224e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/conflict_files_stitcher.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a4899ef1be9285a53b4a3412a311ee1f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blobs_stitcher.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5e1fe756db8adf0384ead3d7ca4d40bb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_file` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2ac95cd9282cf75ce51181ba7bcf087","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":128,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `wiki_page_from_iterator` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d18749d8e89aa853f84d5b8ab2fa1e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":171,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit_service.rb` has 334 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"459baf31c3d4b57e8c9df845211d85c9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":431}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2409600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6776fdb83e8edfae5378441fd52a4925","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree_entry` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00baf604adba61e863f7d154a8dee72b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"186f0eba8b7425edc8cc3c73c38cd40a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":242,"end":262}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `CommitService` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49c846fd451fa9152c64a84b18cea747","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":429}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `ref_service.rb` has 252 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb1efcba78462f496979baf4cb6cd2ad","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1228800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RefService` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00c5cfab9191c2db4747039325616652","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":325}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository_service.rb` has 323 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"493989beb71c8d830c2b79d5553c6147","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":396}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2251200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_remote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f3aee0aba331f59ab18ffef3792b052a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RepositoryService` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ca9b3950e1ce99211058bd24b696cd9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":394}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_squash` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3244c060b29a67dfaca14f5fd90c0c69","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":207,"end":207}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files` has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e11b9bf00977dfd40d466849a02aad7e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":234,"end":235}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files_request_header` has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74f8cedbd2e30f093d96c68640b17e2f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":316,"end":317}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `operation_service.rb` has 284 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e9b10e91d8aa4aecb2dd40e2ff73151e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":343}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1689600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_create_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f83bdf53147b9d2930979ca6a622f44f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_merge_branch` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96dce6cec3c6d464fe3b164bf05adf61","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b324bd9e25781ee4f45ebe63530654b5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":274}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `define_predicate_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1748406e1b1a3efed8bbdbc2f7310efb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fake_application_settings.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"306bfd1a5668c64b46f9a50ffcb84761","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_chunk` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"718a1c6197d9172beada51e8fb725aa8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":173}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `HttpIO` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f90f3bbe0002c0551d2c102e8d6cc2bb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `system_usage_data` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e44de166e4765b13674da7e6f1adbb03","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/usage_data.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `print_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74e543934a1cb0119b1cb9bc2bef6f4a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler/total_time_flat_printer.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_issue_comment_body` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b9885935625732368d27f4d57c09a6b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":327,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `importer.rb` has 283 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1456110a9f0cea86dbda2fdc6ff8b006","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":371}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1675200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fda606a33fed0d051037b3e7ec312764","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e40d64a7ad3fca74d9f0603fcdfde073","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_updates` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"627781504f289b64edb3cae5ded46686","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":237,"end":293}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_attachments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3eae70f0804e77646cf183b658337852","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":312,"end":325}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issues` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"140622e56443443be6d89cf7f8134759","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"81d77c1a0b5ebc4248e39438a9b784c1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_updates` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b843b25138348d8d9e7cf6df7a2f0ed","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":237,"end":293}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `full_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"200d2aea21e0c3f34efb9b3a8051a82f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/rename_reserved_paths_migration/v1/migration_classes.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":15}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `rank_rows` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc13ef2bef6a33cc8bc4e67b71564878","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/median.rb","lines":{"begin":140,"end":174}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `migration_helpers.rb` has 543 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01e21ae134d30a14bd512652b7a940ab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1078}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5419200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_timestamps_with_timezone` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c59bbcc4bf6935d5c169f128844c4c91","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_concurrent_foreign_key` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce151ede627cdfdf31c565ade50905ea","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":206}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disable_statement_timeout` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31b96e31df6242d18aba1d4abf07f1f9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":240,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_column_in_batches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21d13cfd466605197c31d8958201310c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":323,"end":380}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_column_with_default` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009915036d7d7932903bc6f766511a5e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":406,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `copy_indexes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60d019b8234aa4a0d7d445a95ee1e8ae","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":817,"end":859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `bulk_queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"128bc9f2059885db7d254bdb6a31d4b3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":972,"end":993}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `add_concurrent_foreign_key` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6243b1ac45a70775392f6137b36e35f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":206}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_column_in_batches` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6dc99342ecbf79855eb8044b9e00cbdd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":323,"end":380}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_column_type_using_background_migration` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"39133c1e5a2502598dbf0ec8dc0af798","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":593,"end":640}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `rename_column_using_background_migration` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc89feb63b650bd5547ac2ba44210012","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":670,"end":731}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `copy_indexes` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b98ee08501009b6bf421b8064689b30","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":817,"end":859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_config` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b3b0f6bd727a62eae22091574b81015","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/mail_room.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59ca4f1b16f978d96a1c7e36f7e69d62","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rewrite` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f45f6ba5c50a0ab576b49cf1b282a615","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gfm/uploads_rewriter.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unfold_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"be381321436537b6ec6941dcff14d0b9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gfm/reference_rewriter.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sections` has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f6b50ef494458ae4f54e52a28568869","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_match_line_header` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fef2b9774e94d0bd02f1158378f701c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":123,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `as_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed7b03c5a2c2d110a9a9db9e00f3d8d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":168}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `sections` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"629b80d357b767eb9b1f37185affacd4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `which` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"565d3b45775f71100b9c7277076be0f6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/utils.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_go_doc` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e0fac0dd89237b115b26def1d32171a6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_open_files` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83c9d42c4a44fe57eeee2a2b269ddb60","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/multipart.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `decorate_params_value` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32d0634549f8a039069852514c0c4e20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/multipart.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"100b77808e789566083b5722f853d491","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3bfd1976bd1c3f5b63ad73183773103c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":117,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3b76e6c4972600af102835c1739459a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8131d9fa54052fb8688da41fca5b29ff","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":245}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_wiki` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c9017489731af795ba61fdc442e91922","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":266,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_releases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6cf70c97f808766cb57657e58420cb89","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":291}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"564493c4d63110500702ce8552822c02","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_object_to_import` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1c46822af079d421dee8173b07f3b80a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/parallel_scheduling.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_page` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8e73017cc50cf5ae0ff94ea436d3ced","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_rate_limit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8e67dd27500a710187cc201ddc1dded","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":133,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Client` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c409ff9cd79515f70c131a687a58c2d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_sub_relations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de78150728d4deb7bbd23ae848875928","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":159}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_sub_relation` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"357889b554818506acea0dfc8f000afc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e960e3648215aee14c4e5443b5f897b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1dd9f4457d861e5b12020c99ef408fe4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategy_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"343742e2d2dc60bd360734eccf276cc8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/merge_request_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `copy_project_uploads` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d141822a7e49c9987620bcbcaf7749c0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b57d9528846dda6448ed9d3a49747c3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `imported_object` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7150a66352dfbd84b82e4bfa60942b90","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":209}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RelationFactory` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f17a460cbd29b77fbb38f05dd3866a4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":281}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"80346e71805b8ddd466c6b77a8f2e1e6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/group_project_object_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34c8251c050af78b0e432e62b3bf6eaf","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5d84ee4338c67ad951b6130bf67d21a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":98}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac9809b4ea4dd090261cab4784070118","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/build.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `absolute_image_urls` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b291bb28522abd9dde68b0387000c263","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hook_data/base_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `safe_hook_attributes` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"682e99b5b83244042ccc251929255272","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hook_data/merge_request_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `gitaly_client.rb` has 321 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa680293a25a35a2aacd0db231b38fc3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":484}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2222400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96a0315d42972363e3be0faaf33fcff8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `request_kwargs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62070bc24b2fd5133e0a7beab00d9b77","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":197,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `feature_enabled?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"731633ec642f522eb73bf54d30cc752d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":239,"end":269}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enforce_gitaly_request_limits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75016ab6541606469d82939c599b4ad","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":317,"end":340}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"625fb557175f1173f5275a5c774ad3d6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/reference_extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"77acda463966e33d89aa2e8120528ca8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/simple_abstract_check.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `profile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fee59aefc8f7079890f207651b7981f0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `debug` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fdc82615456346012b61b614b718e980","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `protected_branch_push_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32eb78f0c97e724ad8a8d5553b542d3f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `protected_tag_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06f719f8ef5751a719db79c5e8c24be7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":111,"end":120}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChangeAccess` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c155eb2e64ad1ed777bca59ce76dbaef","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ee7f543cac7d3fb2d03c2cf82f45f09","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/commit_check.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `stop` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0578d528100ce788878962a15cbeec2a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/daemon.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `verification_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"278e4598e8040e0a02ba62435277a8b2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gpg/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":100,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26ed72f706cbd880946abd65775661b1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `importer.rb` has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"144e11b64a9050685cd582324f4c5650","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":388}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1560000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe99b8de0e4e755d01efc8644f28aa32","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":386}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32c1c4d58157c12dafbd9c492c51a5aa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d95b586a43aa6e99b3f767263ce65d16","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/present/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b1d8edac9e190461296777cc29e22e5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/authorize/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1438aadd557c25b108eea0106855664","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument_instance_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb2114fa42977c795cf347169a0f542c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bca595f2e9128a833295cec69e8c1e4e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `instrument` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46dbb1e9f69c06f7d078548fc6061570","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4ef0ec3fde55c4188a9f170e0f50760","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/transaction.rb","lines":{"begin":114,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submit_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b54961b8f59db3e5122c4208ded0a04","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `pool` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85d4413ec95715375e2c5ed3923bf252","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":165,"end":181}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `measure` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ce1cb49fa0e90749c14924f01742eab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":133}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"04b6cf203bf783b43e1ac1b54b888441","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_issue_comment_body` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ec61e94902238cc9befa5a1daf367e9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":279,"end":279}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_cases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"deff1dce2bf92e8e8a73a7dad5c4c5c9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3399ad65a3497aa307eaeb32cb5e83e6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":158,"end":196}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_cases` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cdbe17ce063af3997de1ea4bb7b62f8b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a350dd17c12b659d965d2849ad05d077","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":158,"end":196}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `git_access.rb` has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"217b36994b7bc085e2426b68d5ae12da","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":372}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1747200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_authentication_abilities!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12742436ece459400a3eaf9d0a1bb60c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":128,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_project_on_push!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96a9f1789e7e7f1f1ba2da1e54b194c6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":189,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_push_access!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ea1e3ce0a376bfea8bcf0212ff90809","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `GitAccess` has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b604fd91125836b6b7febd9f9706b53","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":371}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_service_account` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ede2112edc62f1c1aaab207b4d2d3bb8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_cluster_role_binding` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35fbb979c3d0eb66f9ca187bb5295521","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a6788548613abbede0f945c93f499e01","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc7e6d5a30b4b296140a3b3ef8f0e44a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a48dbffa8fed1a096624520d3125343e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":109,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5a484ad1bd84dce7a3bef35405340b71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb107ec4ecd65c38b8c57821b432e1bd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_info` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ccb0c18a6f37f110aadd6045933f910","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/auth_hash.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tls_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8cf4abbbf7c74ebb10433a1b19d6e25","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/config.rb","lines":{"begin":210,"end":227}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Config` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8bf80e499225a5522c5bf02c2b5de50","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/config.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b6717c2575d1b9634403637d926a53e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b6717c2575d1b9634403637d926a53e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ldap_search` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d595594b703b1d9783bd955a198807f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_pair` has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0b175175ba20f21bb15cdf8c88896cd1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_array` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6d33eb81193471d4408113ca113deac","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":267,"end":281}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_pair` has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"648c4eb09b87d49a1d79f5d0a77de3ea","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3144000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `login` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c350e7d285ce68091161b324ed9ca293","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/authentication.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b220e2f520a6fff2f90c05ba11999ba","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a4874f3ff061cb0b1aeef04800ada15","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_profile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38ded984fa19d27580db26e0540ac53f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":229,"end":253}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `User` has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e416592e77f689818995fceca5f571bc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":268}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba2b8382483d9be5260822909fe26d56","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/saml/user.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_method_output` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"173a260b95048ce7cfc5164ebeeaa45c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expire_method_caches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6938667a593219bc8d59f8046973c533","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mark` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f23977dd6af02c109c5ecaf6ec88e79","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/string_range_marker.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `position_mapping` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75e44855c1190acfa386bf060fe0c79c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/string_range_marker.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `log_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7bd641d0b563cc47dc64d5b378494dd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/storage_check/cli.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_permission!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"596d8f0ed603043a25830a78af0b7870","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/handler/reply_processing.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6fac16f8fc80d183ffc78d03d2d0245d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `select_body` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74ea18f19435d9abee264cd1facce76a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/reply_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fix_charset` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bbfbab207f44913ec99bdb0f738ef744","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/reply_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `target_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"587a65f54b3a9d4006c9fb8e97881295","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/message/repository_push.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `subject` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"304068a60d47ba6b4d63d0770a3e66e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/message/repository_push.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06bf786acefc4467f3887ce0b97790b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cleanup/remote_uploads.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `steal` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcfc4aae2401e33076da306af1be4a91","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f4a6a0b5a98750c352c1646b1b3f685","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_blocker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `redis_store_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8e3b7658d5f2da0b6cfe80e375fba17a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/wrapper.rb","lines":{"begin":94,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `calculate` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"027f65d9b15a5a20ac32b7746317815a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/project_authorizations/with_nested_groups.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5ffe0c3e3d42265eae2251a019292113","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/user_access.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_push_to_branch?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"303070bb63eb58bcb7a05b3b95932900","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/user_access.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sanitize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce964ef0b84100c7c6ad7cb863485dc1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ssh_public_key.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bb3319e6987280746e3bc73708c56f0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bare_repository_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `to_kubeconfig` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b447110ec4376566b0f143ec7955f597","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_filters` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"52f2917ff84bcee853228888bc9d4f20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/search/query.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `encode!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5023e6a2cc1fe373219230a4ada29baa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/encoding_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `encode_utf8` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7dee9a09179a88f06945225a2a221af","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/encoding_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_exception_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c36580ef2976c77eabf04d27eda6e0b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/prometheus_client.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_full_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6347a85ed559890640d3146272847334","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_sanitizer.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `convert` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"427e98fa770dd0ce1ed98ef15ec75fd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `open_new_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d7e5bd9e7a6c35c9d687fc490695bed","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":232,"end":256}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_xterm_color_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4936b554b5287229c74930b44325b20c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":329,"end":341}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Converter` has 69 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"61a0cb2a3f0303ed57f185452426b79a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6100000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `convert` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd13e7297553d67e7801e8ccc8eed932","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `matches_pattern?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebde1954a4f6fc95ac088dde003d1f7c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/policy/refs.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `match_entries` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12277d192b4e56c2980eae35423fc226","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_version` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c8c5a0217b6a28198bd8cb92d0e82b00","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Entry` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a996c8f128cfc7543769dd21dd5de815","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata/entry.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_s` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6710c7eee920701d15361f52dbe4bd3d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/path.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"481c8d08e5e47d4a4d4be68d0d06fe4b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `chunk_slice_from_offset` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60dbbad2af42b5e9d17acf1180b8e0d6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChunkedIO` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3f6175d5d4d29675f68a7afb44b51fb3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":236}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_coverage` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a126d9b81c791cb0bd1b8cd455422f3b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/stream.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_line` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6e13932e33f438288cd2d7a23cca7b04","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/section_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_next_marker` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b78b80d610593251ebbeb9bb18f6246","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/section_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_string_or_regexp` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a99d0cd045678d388fd755c238f7757f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/legacy_validation_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc0685829f332ba16f511159006c4cf9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":155}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `variables_expressions_syntax` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"736e4fd1de9745ba1bb433fcb5443516","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69c16e006586bdd7ac4cb17f7ede9848","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/attributable.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `helpers` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2d39bb63c3e71381a6cfd8d51654bee4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/configurable.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extend!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fa7fe12ebb0fe9c7eed89e17ece5daf","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable/entry.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `write` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4254fbcc9b1008e1fd6a644e17f14b44","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unsafe_archive!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b90c223da9c451bd90087645954fe5ee","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":125,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Trace` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9e217fe03ddebc9f270b441d4194d76","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":237}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56ff592ebb6677c3a386b683db2b6821","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/chain/validate/config.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tokenize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60a6e3ebf3ba798ac11eca1daba671b8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/expression/lexer.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"494fb3f15182110d4c2051f9a07b9ddc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/expression/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `all_cases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f41f387d6f9c748719d97b454bbe92f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/junit.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_job_dependencies!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97a1046ed696c51fb2ce1bf34f0b7293","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":151}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_on_stop_job!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06fcc3fed9dc213e5669186830670f59","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":180}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f09e73f4a1aa8458ce984db4f5fce37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/downtime_check.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_entry` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f46e2835f32393dfdf07c66c0f704d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/route_map.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2058f84cad6a346389ce944d7c1c76e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/upgrader.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fuzzy_arel_match` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44164fac144fbfeea45df1508dfe02db","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sql/pattern.rb","lines":{"begin":32,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lazy_page_iterator` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ef599b3dc4f1b639d3197c028e40b71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitlab_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge_hash_tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e6ac0be8cece82ccc2e82ff8dd59e20e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/utils/merge_hash.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `listing` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b99984bc28e1e4cbc4903a72d7ac663","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hashed_storage/rake_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `ee_compat_check.rb` has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2103307f841e293ce32cd4161da95965","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":440}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2092800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d35820a437b86e532f50e32d127b5ab0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2b66236ad0f63db5144a0820b94228b9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":211}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `EeCompatCheck` has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36de6fe216cdb6efd396cb08cb43cee5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":439}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ce_branch_doesnt_apply_cleanly_and_no_ee_branch_msg` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e819c9434d1b44e764eb37a75eb1f24c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":336,"end":412}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `scrub` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7d4324ffa269ec245847b9dd62388202","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `<=>` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07c5403aa1fb1c5999cd6138fc8be4c8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/version_info.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform_substitutions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d72ee6aae32c9c1901f52bf269676a8b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `commands_regex` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1bf5c2a5cbd5a2d9489e4fefc15a284e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_h` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75d7faca54c18a6777848a3850d38cc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/command_definition.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `wait` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf93e6de620ccd0324ee0deae40e9661","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/job_waiter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_number_of_plurals` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca29b997f9707951ab1c16832eac75dd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fill_in_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7baf89f0f9dd60c092411c5d3c85f5c4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":236}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `PoLinter` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"befcb8a3c9cdc94613a938be76c2abf4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `missing_members?` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a92dd0b78adf6408e1bb1362dfd52ac0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/create_fork_network_memberships_range.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `migrate_stage_index_sql` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17594a98741c619d81f5982d56852229","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_stage_index.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_restricted_features_todos` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f6311086002a50283e8edb15d2db097","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/remove_restricted_todos.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3b81cbbe6df91a033cc8895bc63aa0e7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/copy_column.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_pair` has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8eeaa32395230adf97a240f222c4203","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_array` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7098a1e02746bd3280879e695e913e37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":262,"end":276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb5327ee9231b73596539ad7b2c167fa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":300,"end":314}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_pair` has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d03740b18e02c4d6c12a846688367eb2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3144000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `single_diff_rows` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c44e90db62947f73461b513d8b2bf71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `single_diff_rows` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc4293178ed4b9812cc3752d52c4c2ae","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `median` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8131f9850b467befa49f83c8893e074e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/base_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `first_time_reference_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"57863573b761b600f6f37177c4bdcc2c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/plan_event_fetcher.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb94f91ea8ea9bfebe88077bde7c9c70","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/blame.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_meta_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a722790729116e77942fe04c5ea5c2fe","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/issuable_metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issuable_meta_data` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"654ad0544dd20bd2a0fa2b2222724814","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/issuable_metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_id_by_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"249edd9d3a49a4634c75d7f66eddf0d3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tree.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_submodules_by_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1779cdd505003a594a0ec1e401b49750","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/gitmodules_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `merge` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"14d8d23268624da10eee3aa315d71171","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":552,"end":552}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `find_commits_by_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"03db09f73721e8dc853a0e8d5c5b586a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":948,"end":948}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository.rb` has 724 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fd0011d1b240dc0bd3776dada53d992","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1045}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8025600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `refs_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b3b8f358aa6754b1127fcaf1fc63eab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":461,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_count_commits_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7dfc3dabbbd3403a850821e31ef9869","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":987,"end":1005}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 117 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e5d4a5ee3414c57e7d1ae875324fab4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":1043}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":10900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `resolve_lines` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a9fd4db8c8cf162f378aa963d6765b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"244c77bd66325eb47245517103368219","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parse` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf9628db17f21b3c6afe90328a37f6d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c678916b00a357376bbd89e7d450a28","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4edbf1e31d321135c7006513a4035f15","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/attributes_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19a8edffd98f8988b199c80f6919a68a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/attributes_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc6e53b3d35661118499e22b31c33048","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `gitaly_update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"29ae202c7d73dff34ed176c4c489e03c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Wiki` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"16108ddc899f6bed5535bed2d4dbd403","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":166}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"992ce430fa1cfa75fffb04b791835530","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/compare.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0e8a3e8bec1d1e4d61a4ca6961eee37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":421}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2501d4f37da4c3f3bfc13d8ddefb8b1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Commit` has 48 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c05f17b105a544fbb7b1e653e4e9622","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_serialized_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"489c6b7588d70b32aa203aa6c41632df","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/diff_collection.rb","lines":{"begin":120,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `between` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4c22ec0e0d894fff0c7dd7383e7e90f2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/diff.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_raw_blame` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5cb9f5c58bb1d9925a29d6754967c20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/blame.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `in_lock` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68b34982cd05d58d79738b15c96f20f7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/exclusive_lease_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d86f72edc80623f2c31df045a73c54a3","location":{"path":"lib/system_check/simple_executor.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `run_check` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32ee25468fc9ba9255e373bf8565a409","location":{"path":"lib/system_check/simple_executor.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dump` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90c4b195bc0f9e6e440c936a49f66db4","location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `dump` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e224fd061ebe87897322d771a18ed4f9","location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dump` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e1d28a077c128dd08f453c105fdd9df","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `restore` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c618e2d28195eb4c364400e1b377f3f","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `restore` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dce1e21850a52796bdc54dd0352fef39","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cleanup` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"df1565e2084a026c19a57df20f8c1dab","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_old` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"25cd2cf6fbb64afd366f3be6ab9d89fd","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unpack` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67d7ec9e6873944629ee60ae0c82b98f","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":110,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Manager` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c011f3bde58a57c5c1b310f99fdde1e8","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":247}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `unpack` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f4697ee5870ab55f0f0482a90f0aafe","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":110,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `decoded` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d399e9cd55ad1c8999c18172266e16d","location":{"path":"lib/omni_auth/strategies/jwt.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `class_for_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44146c776b1d2705ab1e91d14f931ca6","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `compute_class_for_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"504ef7ee6e8fa9917bb219a3ce5a6531","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":298}},"remediation_points":14090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":293}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 722**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1672855f6e5f2e5e61f5f47620f50c44","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":293}},"remediation_points":14090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":298}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 722**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b04488cb6c1d433518d22f9fd7ac22","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":88}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bfe7daee55e5a8099dd7a73db3a63a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":88}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bfe7daee55e5a8099dd7a73db3a63a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":78}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":107,"end":120}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4b2ec9ed4e92599e6bbba9a4a97ebeb0","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":107,"end":120}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0c7ce0e1a2c6b9abe1956a85bf8e6e52","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":227}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":270,"end":299}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672d4e588f6155fa74bf7ca34fedabb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":270,"end":299}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":227}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672d4e588f6155fa74bf7ca34fedabb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":101}},"remediation_points":1490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":103,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 92**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"633c7fa21c24339ba725403293231a75","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":103,"end":103}},"remediation_points":1490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 92**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"633c7fa21c24339ba725403293231a75","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":90}},"remediation_points":1390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 87**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"925e4b3663b9cd9937ee7db7f882dfbc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":102}},"remediation_points":1390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 87**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"925e4b3663b9cd9937ee7db7f882dfbc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"remediation_points":1250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b931145ce6d6777daae248a043f04d6d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b931145ce6d6777daae248a043f04d6d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":18}},"remediation_points":410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 38**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9daf3a24f43b64dd40b3841c26c29df5","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":20}},"remediation_points":410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/bitbucket/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 38**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ebc02a5c26ee206388b48b53d93e24a1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":140}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6778d05c8ddc9f6653765ac7ae623751","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":140}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6778d05c8ddc9f6653765ac7ae623751","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d27c41bdaed8bbbc1c91788baad098b2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e87685897f699d56f0c9bba98c92c792","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e87685897f699d56f0c9bba98c92c792","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":46}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"482f209ad35861d8a59e5e60275568d2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":80}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"482f209ad35861d8a59e5e60275568d2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":24}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":50}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dd9851dda741bf04f8f991425e6b4fa8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":50}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dd9851dda741bf04f8f991425e6b4fa8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":66}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"62cf424fda0f778b3dcc5914fc2096b6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":66}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"62cf424fda0f778b3dcc5914fc2096b6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dc8d377ac78b1e411b24adff2bb25ac8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d6ed9adeccc2432c442bb7e3b2de77ca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e53239021b533bc772fd7c38fd9fbf32","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":99}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":92}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06b83fddd1854f4cbb5ee692f2b3c479","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":92}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fa155c048bfa229583a4b14cba8ef368","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25a210eb00ee75fb3a27aef364105444","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3331c85dad0745b1770318b847052656","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":91}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":133}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a485030c77dac9d4720e17783248f6f2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":133}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70c3aa57163e28d9e2b8cf58b891e37a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":161}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":217}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c29d81ebf7e5c4008896a514ac05cd90","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":217}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":161}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"562f28dc8f9527c3acb9451bb9905421","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}},"remediation_points":770000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ee8707c802bad394fc157d1bd785ea38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}},"remediation_points":770000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"999d054331f9bf60e9fac34f362dfa33","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":363,"end":376}},"remediation_points":730000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":230}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6d5fdcb9f4e92bdc8de77ce0d327e38d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":230}},"remediation_points":730000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":363,"end":376}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b9094b2f402bdf758fbd32cced243c48","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":151}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":207}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9cdba14c6ea64993cb19a2d65e8cf92c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":207}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":151}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a53ce766f9ff3869e29a216c2dd49425","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/serializers/note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":68}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/serializers/project_note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3177b0cd54cd809575f1d61e0a65ac25","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/serializers/project_note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":21}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/serializers/note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc28db1513fbf8f22f0e63c12ccb87bb","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cd274943b0a85d56266ca30e0dc9e6ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":91}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cd274943b0a85d56266ca30e0dc9e6ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":83}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":93}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad9527e40decd629ae978623c4e6dbb3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":93}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a97fc139bd16e6c2c1ebb387c258035","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/commits.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}},"remediation_points":590000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":182,"end":190}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4a0f4dd71fe015ff3e29d7ce0c5f5aa0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":182,"end":190}},"remediation_points":590000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/commits.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"656c922dc9f4dab2a9d07fc10e49f190","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a52f4db116344fb82ae762dfb265af18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"31c92fe357e3684090c3440aef2d0b29","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fed5fac4efc814d8bd6d479976af387a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":236}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":351}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 43**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6f53dee2e0dbe6e42301dfabd181bed2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":351}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":236}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 43**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6f53dee2e0dbe6e42301dfabd181bed2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":119}},"remediation_points":490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":112}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 42**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9fcdc086aaa42b293828e5799976b36c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":112}},"remediation_points":490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":119}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 42**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0aa489542536e966d0d4ee9d92b86de3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":170}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":177,"end":195}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3960d89aa99311987411af9a2ce4316a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":177,"end":195}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":170}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3960d89aa99311987411af9a2ce4316a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":104}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":124}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"04627bf7d430fe80b4f7d86af94fb085","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":124}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"04627bf7d430fe80b4f7d86af94fb085","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/commit_statuses.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 40**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"72cad3326805b4987fbe6343ebb3d0fd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/commit_statuses.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 40**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"69ab1e3ccd645591451e705830d55186","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/timestamps.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":22}},"remediation_points":430000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_index.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 39**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c7a34cb081b464faf300442c9a9c35d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_index.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":21}},"remediation_points":430000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/timestamps.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 39**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c3d38d7fee5df958c3e432d1dd17b38","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":195}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":645,"end":668}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":645,"end":668}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":195}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":469,"end":492}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":599,"end":622}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":599,"end":622}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":469,"end":492}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b710502de22d6ac75887584b4089f55d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5ed54d7e9dec3ef5264c44b21ab42f3b","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6a6be26fc5b134ababae60c5b17185e7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":90}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6a6be26fc5b134ababae60c5b17185e7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":252}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":305,"end":316}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b03582b4029701d34f64ca56f039ff3c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":305,"end":316}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":252}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b03582b4029701d34f64ca56f039ff3c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":615,"end":622}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":706,"end":713}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6613d45047514c566568cdc6b20a1433","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":706,"end":713}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":615,"end":622}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6613d45047514c566568cdc6b20a1433","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e03c415d22f94144c8a11a51bf75449a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a3a69b8619d932aa827e537f3525e47","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/code_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/review_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9c27f17bb5883c88a2dcf096a1e3eb10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/review_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/code_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1a85a78111fd009c906af5e3e2e5c1b3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":61}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"043f75067c16ff3e5d772bc2d1ae6742","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":58}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bc437123bd781d63ac2e5f1e2ee6eb3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_webhooks.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3ed85e9f30996e6d2ccc2e0700c1902e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_webhooks.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7ea2c375fc2078d33f6958933228ed7c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"eb17727d02a7c074c3154590d6ac3890","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":61}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"eb17727d02a7c074c3154590d6ac3890","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":135}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":143}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c728f05ae3efb5098c029de0b3280f52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":143}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":135}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c728f05ae3efb5098c029de0b3280f52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/updated_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/created_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cf343522a426e7b5b70965cafd123e2d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/created_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/updated_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"83ce9e73df4d8e3e8128ba7268e47c86","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1183,"end":1185}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1189,"end":1191}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c5665e3faea9b14f82119a1c414984d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1189,"end":1191}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1183,"end":1185}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c5665e3faea9b14f82119a1c414984d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":96}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb529d437944a41ecb389c07d4f4b95c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":111}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb529d437944a41ecb389c07d4f4b95c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/app/tmp_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/app/log_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5873e0223d34261535ea9380a655f530","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/app/log_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/app/tmp_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5f6516f48de36202ed1fb08b864850e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":20}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71865084b25bec6d7d5ead8d752fb091","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":34}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71865084b25bec6d7d5ead8d752fb091","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":201}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":205,"end":214}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"87efcabb3c142197252756a6564676fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":205,"end":214}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"87efcabb3c142197252756a6564676fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":12}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_into_gitlab_via_ldap_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0022a6eabe051cdbca1e39ad3d0616a0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_into_gitlab_via_ldap_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":14}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":12}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b769bd2ad86996248bc0cb9e9909ad48","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/impersonation_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":30}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/personal_access_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d66178654f9f4136765d0ea5d8b3e694","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/personal_access_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":28}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/admin/impersonation_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7450a990959a14aea730f2b6be2c03b2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":85}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9983d989b521b3d7814b329e7276929a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9983d989b521b3d7814b329e7276929a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/podspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/gemspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bff03fdced6cbae88ff2946f20dc10e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/gemspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/podspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"51fdccc6768efcdd38f19730ffe72a7c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/stage.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":442,"end":449}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25c1e443e5b07fc0b45f399a084137f7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":442,"end":449}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/stage.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"577c618e98095b86078d36b2ac019b73","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":63}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":50}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"34d52e18accbf89e1d40ad4efe71140e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":50}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7249b946ecaa77a923de68a038829979","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b855af99fe41d98222cc7d488606c72e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b855af99fe41d98222cc7d488606c72e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/members.rb","lines":{"begin":132,"end":137}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/access_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"74eeab655880b068d73bfa1508e15e08","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/access_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":81}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/members.rb","lines":{"begin":132,"end":137}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"89dd703acaf685f87aef279f54d3c31a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":109}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8f3ea2a51c54532c43041c348ab5c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":123}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":109}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8f3ea2a51c54532c43041c348ab5c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e02e496b4b6107134a36720421ac55a9","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e02e496b4b6107134a36720421ac55a9","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":14}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4456b6f43cef6bfbf9b6d039f749cdc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4456b6f43cef6bfbf9b6d039f749cdc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":262}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":290}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":290}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":262}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":396,"end":405}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":410,"end":419}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":410,"end":419}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":396,"end":405}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":61}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f75f6fbbc7064f4fdca08c087adf39c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":104}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f75f6fbbc7064f4fdca08c087adf39c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef81133143dac9759b71c4ff2fbf45ed","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":25}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26fd0da9b8c1ef08c93581298c4ae63a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":564,"end":575}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":579,"end":590}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7853b1dd44bd6645b11dfd03b93082d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":579,"end":590}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":564,"end":575}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7853b1dd44bd6645b11dfd03b93082d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":211,"end":225}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":210}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85278ceed072f59d95f4d59bb38349cd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":210}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":211,"end":225}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"84267e4195b1ef161585bb368ab56cb4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b3c569353eb654d48c0f3d5dfd5507","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b3c569353eb654d48c0f3d5dfd5507","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/prometheus_metric.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":43}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/preferences_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"84368938cf4e38b28be7f2494ab7dded","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/preferences_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/prometheus_metric.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"60bfb34cb2ceca3dea92da73de2720d1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":826,"end":838}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":842,"end":854}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f850bbad5c6c0dbf53dcda181b0fe2ef","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":842,"end":854}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":826,"end":838}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f850bbad5c6c0dbf53dcda181b0fe2ef","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1195,"end":1197}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1201,"end":1203}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"79536c6f949eba9317227c4e88951f1f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1201,"end":1203}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1195,"end":1197}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"79536c6f949eba9317227c4e88951f1f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":242}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":272}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c2d74780d6448543b93af9ac07770eb6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":272}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":242}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c2d74780d6448543b93af9ac07770eb6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a21c2dc3f646e0e31fff25ee48b9b44","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":29}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a21c2dc3f646e0e31fff25ee48b9b44","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":276,"end":283}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c5f1ca2a225a96cfa3b4fc88b12b03b0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":276,"end":283}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c5f1ca2a225a96cfa3b4fc88b12b03b0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/branches.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":75}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/triggers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6da3752f53f9199ec80a8ad0d2b565c1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/triggers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":16}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/branches.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a596f82671816ebb68812ebe7bf8287","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9c68d19fac636a233c57119e7465aae0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb90f649add7621cd688c8cf825bd6ac","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":56}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bde5f678a848776d31606c1f7b9474fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":63}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37daabf17a192f4d7be1f8b27c2260a6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_job_artifact.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_lfs_object.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8744b4f4833ad7e9ac1e28093ac9f90e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_lfs_object.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_job_artifact.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7504dbd080f799a40cd6f4e9f9588e2e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":419,"end":427}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blob_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"63af7969c300adefbe9421c884f45ddf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blob_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":101}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":419,"end":427}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"037891a3606e1c8a2fffd32f88e7cede","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":25}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a65a519016a876bba37ba5a3c7a819f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":30}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a65a519016a876bba37ba5a3c7a819f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/repository_check.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/namespace_check.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6d29fff75b609f46ded82f4a44c12b3e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/namespace_check.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":30}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/repository_check.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5b93c21edd90205b8238e3ade31ae23","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/concerns/created_at_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":8}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":315,"end":319}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4781409b61d0fe8557e646dde62af4ee","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":315,"end":319}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/concerns/created_at_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":8}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"99f151d4d58ba006fbb17af802305432","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":572,"end":575}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":220,"end":223}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3c0fb0db7a1fa6852c67bd50857aa448","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":220,"end":223}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":572,"end":575}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"44cfa492a10b5b72b394efe01cd9e29d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"320c3b54951e69257faaca3316f72058","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fa689b5b4bab39de500b86b3d6814963","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":75}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26a19237576df2b97ff121c3b0cd2342","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":91}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26a19237576df2b97ff121c3b0cd2342","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":150}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fc526fdd6733948898ee897d1eef487e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":150}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fc526fdd6733948898ee897d1eef487e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/shared_state.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/queues.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"077a90f16d3842a49d8095f339e2187f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/queues.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":28}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/shared_state.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f48114ce0a7710485f176b1b75c08e79","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/issue_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/merge_request_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"685a5435dac10b7fc45977c34f30aba3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/merge_request_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/issue_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc65c6ec010926daa88fbdcb539ddeea","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d6588749bb4b05d1e583e13b9a75e39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e1b42460d85ed0074c2f1fbd38bf2631","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f4d765094c9218d5390de58501e17b93","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"caa789e408f667bb83169e9a6e4f54bb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7b7e24c67302a04433b92238befc3cf1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"935ca74221c521771d96150adf2278fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"db86386cff8c19e24cbadfb75750f1d9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"db86386cff8c19e24cbadfb75750f1d9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":96}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":114}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"860f8a405f1b26af1f14049631bd7aa9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":114}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"860f8a405f1b26af1f14049631bd7aa9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/subscription_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":26}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue_status_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d440b0e1b0cca3d485fda9e0c4aaee09","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue_status_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/subscription_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d85cea2030ab41431ddc90787eb11389","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/ci_yaml_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"remediation_points":4620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/dockerfile_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 189**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4a9d91d82457a2a845b5366d5f0ce5b4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/dockerfile_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"remediation_points":4620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/ci_yaml_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 189**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9a6d28971082883e9748dd3bac2a6695","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":316,"end":324}},"remediation_points":1470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/pipelines/pipelines_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 84**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5595f472c12029fb0da2e625d62d94d6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/pipelines/pipelines_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}},"remediation_points":1470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":316,"end":324}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 84**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"30d9e8739fb74a1a2a7618b85b5e6f7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1204,"end":1222}},"remediation_points":3990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1222,"end":1240}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 168**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4725f16bae793b141b64c0921a6539b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1222,"end":1240}},"remediation_points":3990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1204,"end":1222}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 168**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4725f16bae793b141b64c0921a6539b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/group_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":14}},"remediation_points":3810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/shared/project_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 162**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"90682f4af3abe93c6405cd6eb215e9c6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/shared/project_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":15}},"remediation_points":3810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/group_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 162**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67e63301cd433971695d7cc16ff752b2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"272dee8d71a4ab9c8d815e23c04c7742","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"272dee8d71a4ab9c8d815e23c04c7742","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":59}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f1257b0729020dbf8c1e761c6b423db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"39bdab25a792c5662feb840979099a97","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commons/polyfills/element.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":283}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b95252006271b6a23d2d59296a0e5778","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":283}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commons/polyfills/element.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67ee0da8e9d2d3b183449d9e8d462f44","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":99,"end":135}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6e9b85292de8771601751d3ed0d9dc18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":99,"end":135}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6e9b85292de8771601751d3ed0d9dc18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":115}},"remediation_points":2700000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":127}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 125**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0fee1b42ff17f6df3a6f14e35f13cf18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":127}},"remediation_points":2700000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":115}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 125**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0fee1b42ff17f6df3a6f14e35f13cf18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"15c8237c5ef3dd70061ce1d44bd5d199","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8ae282c95da75609356442ee0da6e6fc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/new_group_child.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":262}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"611a498e9c5e5d8f256a05631ef5ac51","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":262}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/new_group_child.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37087f35974839e5e79033d561c840a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":117}},"remediation_points":2310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":126}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 112**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0e6b703c746c94d22e3a02f1993665ce","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":126}},"remediation_points":2310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":117}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 112**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0e6b703c746c94d22e3a02f1993665ce","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":71}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef21ab3df8b01ca7e22d4d8804157d7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":71}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef21ab3df8b01ca7e22d4d8804157d7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6b694c569da1307b1f359dff7c2ba96a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3334e14e9af8a36a250b2eeea4a85929","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7f09eaadb7107879ce06fbd895c6dfd2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":142}},"remediation_points":2130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 106**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"316f57fc6559be3f06b67e902431d4f3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":153}},"remediation_points":2130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":142}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 106**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"316f57fc6559be3f06b67e902431d4f3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":15}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7d9d7ed069d90637ae3219e74dfc3a6a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":24}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"de8d186c2d499f4864bd5be7db1ddad4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":53}},"remediation_points":2010000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 102**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c1e5733385780c688efc3db1ad11f746","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}},"remediation_points":2010000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 102**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8de13799b826a6e485d4019569e6c278","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":124,"end":134}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"762a1afa922792a6981db079fca70fa7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":124,"end":134}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"762a1afa922792a6981db079fca70fa7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"23431c5334e56a528fc4eb179e3607ec","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c7090c499a2a96d464475ad7f818f11","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":90}},"remediation_points":1890000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38d9afeb8b320571be87977725fdcafe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":108}},"remediation_points":1890000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8bc2a8aade90176f81a992ae00dd6e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}},"remediation_points":1860000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutation_types.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 97**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7a9bae0109305e0b1d43de56513651bb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutation_types.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}},"remediation_points":1860000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 97**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"500922ffefee136d140bb5e95d7a3653","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1830000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 96**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"746b71495fe41db39299682caa93445c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1830000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 96**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5f6ce24443dd76a3e1d0f7521a36be5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":10}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e788e65abb5a4f6fb80e4e6628fb6d10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":20}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":10}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e788e65abb5a4f6fb80e4e6628fb6d10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3f756c21d7aebceedb361afbef2d4a17","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3f756c21d7aebceedb361afbef2d4a17","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":34}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":243,"end":245}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"50b54b3d38d73c256194eed3de425376","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":243,"end":245}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"50b54b3d38d73c256194eed3de425376","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":112}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3d4aa6b1ed1ed8586dbb1479749be92","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":112}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3d4aa6b1ed1ed8586dbb1479749be92","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"961bf4d63d82bd0547b50951a7db6c69","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":111}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"961bf4d63d82bd0547b50951a7db6c69","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":514,"end":533}},"remediation_points":1650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":522,"end":533}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 90**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e69530c757a3f18db186fc48d529606d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":522,"end":533}},"remediation_points":1650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":514,"end":533}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 90**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e69530c757a3f18db186fc48d529606d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":99}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":114}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0407713555d3e0c75813d9f23089bcfd","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":114}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0407713555d3e0c75813d9f23089bcfd","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":41}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4a3e547360e709e6f65d844f47d2578","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":55}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":41}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4a3e547360e709e6f65d844f47d2578","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":57}},"remediation_points":1530000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/stores/pipelines_store.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 86**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac70092b1281d03613501e7bff10586e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/stores/pipelines_store.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":31}},"remediation_points":1530000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 86**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d99660a2eda83bcadef8b0ab894abe34","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}},"remediation_points":1500000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d5915d3ead3c5d344920b58d2d29398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":153}},"remediation_points":1500000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d5915d3ead3c5d344920b58d2d29398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6bca973f7e7c682a30bc1ec4bf9bd764","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6bca973f7e7c682a30bc1ec4bf9bd764","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0eb61104cf3e71a06f399141f9b4fa0d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"remediation_points":1410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25ff43fa592634a300a75d479e7131a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25ff43fa592634a300a75d479e7131a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":91}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8761bbf2f2e7182d15c059e6eda61093","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":99}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8761bbf2f2e7182d15c059e6eda61093","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/blob/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/tree/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10512ee694664bf38a3b98f1983d771f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/tree/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/blob/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cacb4070042747bc39f22b6ed696d288","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":65}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14f5cdeb3ea2bd6b45456111559d4372","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14f5cdeb3ea2bd6b45456111559d4372","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":154}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":156,"end":160}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c9b1f08a21d96ed70ae569a5f20147b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":156,"end":160}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":154}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c9b1f08a21d96ed70ae569a5f20147b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":382}},"remediation_points":1320000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":382,"end":387}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f7da63bef0b10cc1b2852a187aa6da7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":382,"end":387}},"remediation_points":1320000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":382}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f7da63bef0b10cc1b2852a187aa6da7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 78**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c151b6404d32d859c90476abc53a459a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 78**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2e1258cb46a94d486ff0c217b7ee506b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/tree.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":84}},"remediation_points":1260000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 77**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5801c2247d4ab393293432462fbf849b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1260000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/tree.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":84}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 77**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0b9486994211d1c4a0385b3c9ac7339f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ce9535c497280ac0f885dd216908adc4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5ee1687cc7901d1085a41d0b7d5b3730","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":65}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0d9f79efa645b760bbea0b48922a8231","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9033fca3ba0465c4cc79203ac97a67c6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":197,"end":202}},"remediation_points":1200000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":204,"end":209}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"46e2ef5ccb0e3676b035d790303474f6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":204,"end":209}},"remediation_points":1200000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":197,"end":202}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"46e2ef5ccb0e3676b035d790303474f6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6738e3ca61bc9141c14aca35a4ece63","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b0ce2389e2ef7f95bdab6dd30392133a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e577605dea8912ffd5b82ee2e188ec76","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":133}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1825ad84d47a08c46a9dd2a4386db970","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":133}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1825ad84d47a08c46a9dd2a4386db970","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40924a71c4587ae28cb080829b65871c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40924a71c4587ae28cb080829b65871c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":9}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ca3e7297c2c42380a6b34e26f5faa025","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":15}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":9}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ca3e7297c2c42380a6b34e26f5faa025","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":26}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/branch.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5b01e7cc1ccdb5b45e44117d01906827","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/branch.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e8265ff476562ddb4bd141410d88ad2f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"33bcc15ccc0be1f4e4787d8882ad36e2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":15}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"931ead2443e997ee26d698667339fb06","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":244}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"36bae5f12de5a60023e0fd8fc19f1842","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":244}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"36bae5f12de5a60023e0fd8fc19f1842","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"47474e924fc42a7e0f1319c7a8ae13d3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"aade96d11a83331446e70683959d49ec","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":385}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":418,"end":422}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fdc3dab0afea85797bddfc16706a3869","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":418,"end":422}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":385}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fdc3dab0afea85797bddfc16706a3869","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":80,"end":83}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85e1a20133858d47a7f4a64e49080aef","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":80,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85e1a20133858d47a7f4a64e49080aef","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":37}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c7c7576a99db4f904055a712b428b46","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":37}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c7c7576a99db4f904055a712b428b46","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/index.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/folder/environments_folder_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b80cd93182a7ed27e84c9e59840d8f01","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/folder/environments_folder_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":34}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/index.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2beaf3990d7c635f7339eb68a668c3a8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":20}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9441eb5a1202300a1a6bfdd0f0275a31","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":213}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f657ac30a9ca0e466c504f33ae3363a1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":259,"end":264}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":269}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40a4102731fea710642a925d4403b398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":269}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":259,"end":264}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40a4102731fea710642a925d4403b398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":68}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":82}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5c966c3b72bce8578a3e8c47c412d39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":82}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5c966c3b72bce8578a3e8c47c412d39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":45}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5aa5f88f636432f3381edff9ce5eb33c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":51}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":45}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5aa5f88f636432f3381edff9ce5eb33c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":207,"end":220}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":234}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c3008559d14ec2056a4514ffdfd5d04b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":234}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":207,"end":220}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c3008559d14ec2056a4514ffdfd5d04b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1506,"end":1515}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37585e488e2d24ae8b8b99880ff76099","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1506,"end":1515}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ea9f3aa39779bc4f5ead96ecdcd5e87c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5306c1b3e6d8ac0ac9bed008b527b8a7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4dfd0fcaf710a6337c5924d7c4fa91ea","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71749d080c69b950423ce3e73b3671d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"80bd962a66c5ba8f3bb261204e0e8404","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4dccfbb8118720c67894021eefaeb04f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"594be23bc97d64731abf2df62520ccd3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/services/clusters_service.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":12}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5b85961f2c362ae642ccf393b8352fcb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":102}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/services/clusters_service.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":12}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cad81c7468728ba369f9f23c8a1271bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":93}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":172,"end":174}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"beda25571cf3ea070a68d9cdfae91c8d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":172,"end":174}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":93}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"beda25571cf3ea070a68d9cdfae91c8d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/target_branch_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":53}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/timezone_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"575f1444e3c2fec5a4f47d049cbd87c0","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/timezone_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":67}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/target_branch_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e4303b5381a6be7bcaade373d766f34","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":42}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1d8b266328571b1177e922384e474eb5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":57}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"334a900ffecf98fb6a951456c58236a1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":181,"end":183}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":290,"end":292}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"32fbc7cab878611e7f156798ae3d2bca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":290,"end":292}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":181,"end":183}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"32fbc7cab878611e7f156798ae3d2bca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c14eefb5c2db69bb969956efd4384de","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":63}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c14eefb5c2db69bb969956efd4384de","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":277,"end":286}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":287,"end":296}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"923d82c4da880c23e929c2402aedd37e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":287,"end":296}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":277,"end":286}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"923d82c4da880c23e929c2402aedd37e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":34}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"938856cdef6ef5aa2933db645ea96362","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"938856cdef6ef5aa2933db645ea96362","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":39}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b35237501aeed21f2d38aef31627b97e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"17da47f3678555baddd89ae6622e441f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":31}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a93d28498cd20f4d35a3f8dbbc0a7a35","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":46}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a93d28498cd20f4d35a3f8dbbc0a7a35","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":241}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":340,"end":344}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"785078efeabfa8c98aa5bf0804b2619d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":340,"end":344}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":241}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"785078efeabfa8c98aa5bf0804b2619d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}},"remediation_points":840000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/diff/controller.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 63**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"09d7d5a8cacd9d95c32bc8b4e6b53930","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/diff/controller.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":16}},"remediation_points":840000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 63**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f94a7934b1c80152deb5b61a0c5db3d4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":124}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":126,"end":132}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"104c7ee7f9a45a32c42bacfaa5a5f1bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":126,"end":132}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":124}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"104c7ee7f9a45a32c42bacfaa5a5f1bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f17e867f83499d67ff9ed50b8097db5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":57}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f17e867f83499d67ff9ed50b8097db5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":84}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c4a434df3787893bc1f6d897464a8227","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":34}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":84}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c1f719b9039c86ffdc704317d783449","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":24}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab079e1e6bc28e1fc184b520beb34531","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":21}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7369e08c5971c04639cff93271173af","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":64}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1ad13a005d315ccf15cfe0584579158f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":64}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1ad13a005d315ccf15cfe0584579158f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":107,"end":111}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":117}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9228663eecdf0fc1a8dbd811c863e38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":117}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":107,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9228663eecdf0fc1a8dbd811c863e38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":36}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/landing.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0cdcc38394199ec6567937ce812cb5a5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/landing.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":21}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6b06657bea1bfe588af0efba4a2bf57e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":31}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f5e585cdfd268a3748dbdd584f69df8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":39}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67d77d7b888d52cac1d666c6a95ba502","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":46}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"16eb34236a934fb101dbe1e8b6ab4af1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"16eb34236a934fb101dbe1e8b6ab4af1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":203}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"13f117af1725bb929e7aa63491a25429","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":203}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"13f117af1725bb929e7aa63491a25429","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":16}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":238,"end":247}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a553868b7fea8b08596f9a95a22d484","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":238,"end":247}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"12bd1fc0fd53a6c025f6ed5d690be133","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7e7f0899a668845138c08c503e337fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":55}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7e7f0899a668845138c08c503e337fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":11}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"21bb124a570e4088d0684442dade767f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":16}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"21bb124a570e4088d0684442dade767f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":26}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d22f4f9ddac4d361d9f6721a25ded899","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":46}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d22f4f9ddac4d361d9f6721a25ded899","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":116}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/constants.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d9ad4d62a2c7b3a5ee02495f81a78cd8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/constants.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":56}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":116}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b9bd1f7a0fafe178e70f6a652d6fd8be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/components/diff_file_editor.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/resolve_discussion_btn.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"423d5a0cc874e941bd22657b325446b4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/resolve_discussion_btn.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":21}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/components/diff_file_editor.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"716df5a6c1cbc00338163aa638130bca","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":436,"end":441}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":452,"end":457}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a2cd4548ee8c0362f69cc88ee5982c0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":452,"end":457}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":436,"end":441}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a2cd4548ee8c0362f69cc88ee5982c0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":221}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e71451918dac542ee62e859e4a694a23","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6696916f5ca830f21733956d3dc83b22","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"723e924a871cea3a66a3ccd49f2f4407","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":54}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"723e924a871cea3a66a3ccd49f2f4407","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":102}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38cb87a7a94d43c42903f71cfd248953","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":108}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38cb87a7a94d43c42903f71cfd248953","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":129}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"77fe9230b5c1c681ca23dd48b5bde881","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":153}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":129}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"77fe9230b5c1c681ca23dd48b5bde881","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":42}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6369d3d651e38cbbac285afad5297e9d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6369d3d651e38cbbac285afad5297e9d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":108,"end":111}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":116}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8d07121aa08a0ef9af946ea4e5d60d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":116}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":108,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8d07121aa08a0ef9af946ea4e5d60d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":45}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c224ff513833f281d7bb58fb1280314","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":49}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":45}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c224ff513833f281d7bb58fb1280314","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":136}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":147}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e09ce34a63a712c502dfcaa775c5a8e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":147}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":136}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e09ce34a63a712c502dfcaa775c5a8e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":123}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":131}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5dcf5b9ed09acddcf34d9b99f4f7d4e0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":131}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5dcf5b9ed09acddcf34d9b99f4f7d4e0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/tree/services/commit_pipeline_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/services/job_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"020d87eef79dcc6d4979a4877f795e88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/services/job_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/tree/services/commit_pipeline_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7f3c54ba927268843f9fe397b30c4541","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":23}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cc2a5b7fe6f4a900c4690f4960b1d2ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cc2a5b7fe6f4a900c4690f4960b1d2ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":104}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/modal_store.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e9ffa7b55a2d3d697297bb9c77d9e0c8","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/modal_store.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":74}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cae962d929e29ddbbe69117801f17860","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/issues/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/merge_requests/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"65a33b3fe4ae20436c9fb46d65d9db04","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/merge_requests/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/issues/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1b0f3dfb819efd869e74a58517390763","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":58}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ed657cc5e6969316c8bd1d2be6204668","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":54}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3da1a06772dc32dbbb550900c97f6cbd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":130}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":159}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6c22427e43838beefc533b33cde9955","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":159}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":130}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6c22427e43838beefc533b33cde9955","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":18}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5eaf7d9cd8339dca959f74f384e02906","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":23}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5eaf7d9cd8339dca959f74f384e02906","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":148}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":250,"end":252}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70155684217b5724087f40626f7766bc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":250,"end":252}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":148}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70155684217b5724087f40626f7766bc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":134,"end":137}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":138,"end":141}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"180e35eb524273ddfc92de366020a611","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":138,"end":141}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":134,"end":137}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"180e35eb524273ddfc92de366020a611","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":106}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672a79b04a463defdd46c0086474fd52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":123}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":106}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672a79b04a463defdd46c0086474fd52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":149}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4ebfab6abe3fb873067f7b37190c9136","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":149}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4ebfab6abe3fb873067f7b37190c9136","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":53}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":60,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10bdf4c525726570be1c10982443983e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":60,"end":67}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10bdf4c525726570be1c10982443983e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":77}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"223d4160dbc2f173c7019bf4258bf71a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":80}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":77}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f69c39865bb0c31ba27242592efb90a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1451,"end":1457}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1459,"end":1465}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06432a7535afbcbc307fe2c2fad49f03","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1459,"end":1465}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1451,"end":1457}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06432a7535afbcbc307fe2c2fad49f03","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":66}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":423,"end":426}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3cf8b42abcd81551bbf1d4b6a86a23ec","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":423,"end":426}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":66}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3cf8b42abcd81551bbf1d4b6a86a23ec","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":224}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":564,"end":565}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9b59a169ec24710bb17e53176d9f6484","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":564,"end":565}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":224}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"629f61554a8bb6a8eb033206d609a01e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":95}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":98}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a37da012d8b9134f9c2c07cbe6e5df45","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":98}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a37da012d8b9134f9c2c07cbe6e5df45","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":52}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad4849cc4103d257a75a53f533f93f88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":72}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":52}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad4849cc4103d257a75a53f533f93f88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/project.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/milestone.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"63e808e699724c7876463b889a910d69","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/milestone.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/project.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d888235869b541141524699d46a10fe","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":143}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a5d03fc520fddde3ecc4ff06b86c9a0d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":143}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a0bd2adf62a695699f94e1cef624dd7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":76}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1dc35d639071fed3c333a47b9c544d56","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":81}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":76}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1dc35d639071fed3c333a47b9c544d56","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":234,"end":240}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":260,"end":266}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9f4b3f70b4ef899508948c84a381a89","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":260,"end":266}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":234,"end":240}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9f4b3f70b4ef899508948c84a381a89","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":20}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d44f8e3653f3f06777c422f4151a7d3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":28}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9ff0344a1b63248724d8413b03573b43","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"categories":["Security"],"check_name":"Insecure Dependency","content":{"body":"**Advisory**: CVE-2018-1000211\n\n**URL**: https://blog.justinbull.ca/cve-2018-1000211-public-apps-cant-revoke-tokens-in-doorkeeper/\n\n**Solution**: upgrade to >= 4.4.0, >= 5.0.0.rc2"},"description":"Doorkeeper gem does not revoke token for public clients","location":{"path":"Gemfile.lock","lines":{"begin":173,"end":173}},"remediation_points":5000000,"severity":"minor","type":"Issue","fingerprint":"13e50c564110ecb5eba441004fe52261","engine_name":"bundler-audit"},{"categories":["Security"],"check_name":"Insecure Dependency","content":{"body":"**Advisory**: CVE-2018-3769\n\n**URL**: https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/issues/1762\n\n**Solution**: upgrade to >= 1.1.0"},"description":"ruby-grape Gem has XSS via \"format\" parameter","location":{"path":"Gemfile.lock","lines":{"begin":346,"end":346}},"remediation_points":5000000,"severity":"minor","type":"Issue","fingerprint":"ac6d981abbf80f299374d5a1081c7d66","engine_name":"bundler-audit"}]
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz
deleted file mode 100644
index f04ec0065b4..00000000000
--- a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz
+++ /dev/null
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/csv_empty.csv b/spec/fixtures/csv_empty.csv
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e69de29bb2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/csv_empty.csv
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/valid.po b/spec/fixtures/valid.po
index c9b68d16153..e580af66939 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/valid.po
+++ b/spec/fixtures/valid.po
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: gitlab 1.0.0\n"
 "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2017-07-13 12:10-0500\n"
+"PO-Creation-Date: 2016-07-13 12:11-0500\n"
 "Language-Team: Spanish\n"
 "Language: es\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
diff --git a/spec/frontend/add_context_commits_modal/components/__snapshots__/add_context_commits_modal_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/add_context_commits_modal/components/__snapshots__/add_context_commits_modal_spec.js.snap
index 5fad0d07f97..8948a9926bb 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/add_context_commits_modal/components/__snapshots__/add_context_commits_modal_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/add_context_commits_modal/components/__snapshots__/add_context_commits_modal_spec.js.snap
@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ exports[`AddContextCommitsModal renders modal with 2 tabs 1`] = `
     theme="indigo"
     value="0"
   >
-    <gl-tab-stub>
+    <gl-tab-stub
+      titlelinkclass=""
+    >
        
       <div
         class="mt-2"
@@ -37,7 +39,9 @@ exports[`AddContextCommitsModal renders modal with 2 tabs 1`] = `
       </div>
     </gl-tab-stub>
      
-    <gl-tab-stub>
+    <gl-tab-stub
+      titlelinkclass=""
+    >
        
       <review-tab-container-stub
         commits=""
diff --git a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_old_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_old_spec.js.snap
deleted file mode 100644
index 9306bf24baf..00000000000
--- a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_old_spec.js.snap
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-// Jest Snapshot v1, https://goo.gl/fbAQLP
-
-exports[`AlertsSettingsFormOld with default values renders the initial template 1`] = `
-"<gl-form-stub>
-  <h5 class=\\"gl-font-lg gl-my-5\\"></h5>
-  <!---->
-  <div data-testid=\\"alert-settings-description\\">
-    <p>
-      <gl-sprintf-stub message=\\"You must provide this URL and authorization key to authorize an external service to send alerts to GitLab. You can provide this URL and key to multiple services. After configuring an external service, alerts from your service will display on the GitLab %{linkStart}Alerts%{linkEnd} page.\\"></gl-sprintf-stub>
-    </p>
-    <p>
-      <gl-sprintf-stub message=\\"Review your external service's documentation to learn where to provide this information to your external service, and the %{linkStart}GitLab documentation%{linkEnd} to learn more about configuring your endpoint.\\"></gl-sprintf-stub>
-    </p>
-  </div>
-  <gl-form-group-stub label-for=\\"integration-type\\" label=\\"Integration\\">
-    <gl-form-select-stub id=\\"integration-type\\" options=\\"[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]\\" data-testid=\\"alert-settings-select\\" value=\\"HTTP\\"></gl-form-select-stub> <span class=\\"gl-text-gray-500\\"><gl-sprintf-stub message=\\"Learn more about our our upcoming %{linkStart}integrations%{linkEnd}\\"></gl-sprintf-stub></span>
-  </gl-form-group-stub>
-  <gl-form-group-stub label=\\"Active\\" label-for=\\"active\\">
-    <toggle-button-stub id=\\"active\\"></toggle-button-stub>
-  </gl-form-group-stub>
-  <!---->
-  <gl-form-group-stub label=\\"Webhook URL\\" label-for=\\"url\\">
-    <gl-form-input-group-stub value=\\"/alerts/notify.json\\" predefinedoptions=\\"[object Object]\\" id=\\"url\\" readonly=\\"\\"></gl-form-input-group-stub> <span class=\\"gl-text-gray-500\\">
-
-      </span>
-  </gl-form-group-stub>
-  <gl-form-group-stub label-for=\\"authorization-key\\">
-    <gl-form-input-group-stub value=\\"\\" predefinedoptions=\\"[object Object]\\" id=\\"authorization-key\\" readonly=\\"\\" class=\\"gl-mb-2\\"></gl-form-input-group-stub>
-    <gl-button-stub category=\\"primary\\" variant=\\"default\\" size=\\"medium\\" icon=\\"\\" buttontextclasses=\\"\\" disabled=\\"true\\" class=\\"gl-mt-3\\" role=\\"button\\" tabindex=\\"0\\">Reset key</gl-button-stub>
-    <gl-modal-stub modalid=\\"tokenModal\\" titletag=\\"h4\\" modalclass=\\"\\" size=\\"md\\" title=\\"Reset key\\" ok-title=\\"Reset key\\" ok-variant=\\"danger\\">
-      Resetting the authorization key for this project will require updating the authorization key in every alert source it is enabled in.
-    </gl-modal-stub>
-  </gl-form-group-stub>
-  <gl-form-group-stub label=\\"Alert test payload\\" label-for=\\"alert-json\\">
-    <gl-form-textarea-stub noresize=\\"true\\" id=\\"alert-json\\" disabled=\\"true\\" state=\\"true\\" placeholder=\\"Enter test alert JSON....\\" rows=\\"6\\" max-rows=\\"10\\"></gl-form-textarea-stub>
-  </gl-form-group-stub>
-  <gl-button-stub category=\\"primary\\" variant=\\"default\\" size=\\"medium\\" icon=\\"\\" buttontextclasses=\\"\\" disabled=\\"true\\">Test alert payload</gl-button-stub>
-  <div class=\\"footer-block row-content-block gl-display-flex gl-justify-content-space-between\\">
-    <gl-button-stub category=\\"primary\\" variant=\\"success\\" size=\\"medium\\" icon=\\"\\" buttontextclasses=\\"\\" disabled=\\"true\\">
-      Save changes
-    </gl-button-stub>
-    <gl-button-stub category=\\"primary\\" variant=\\"default\\" size=\\"medium\\" icon=\\"\\" buttontextclasses=\\"\\" disabled=\\"true\\">
-      Cancel
-    </gl-button-stub>
-  </div>
-</gl-form-stub>"
-`;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_new_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_spec.js.snap
index e2ef7483316..a1ced8910b3 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_new_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/__snapshots__/alerts_settings_form_spec.js.snap
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ exports[`AlertsSettingsFormNew with default values renders the initial template
       <div id=\\"integration-webhook\\" role=\\"group\\" class=\\"form-group gl-form-group\\"><label id=\\"integration-webhook__BV_label_\\" for=\\"integration-webhook\\" class=\\"d-block col-form-label\\">3. Set up webhook</label>
         <div class=\\"bv-no-focus-ring\\"><span>Utilize the URL and authorization key below to authorize an external service to send alerts to GitLab. Review your external service's documentation to learn where to add these details, and the <a rel=\\"noopener noreferrer\\" target=\\"_blank\\" href=\\"https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/operations/incident_management/alert_integrations.html\\" class=\\"gl-link gl-display-inline-block\\">GitLab documentation</a> to learn more about configuring your endpoint.</span> <label class=\\"gl-display-flex gl-flex-direction-column gl-mb-0 gl-w-max-content gl-my-4 gl-font-weight-normal\\">
             <div class=\\"gl-toggle-wrapper\\"><span class=\\"gl-toggle-label\\">Active</span>
-              <!----> <button aria-label=\\"Active\\" type=\\"button\\" class=\\"gl-toggle\\"><span class=\\"toggle-icon\\"><svg data-testid=\\"close-icon\\" class=\\"gl-icon s16\\"><use href=\\"#close\\"></use></svg></span></button></div>
+              <!----> <button aria-label=\\"Active\\" type=\\"button\\" class=\\"gl-toggle\\"><span class=\\"toggle-icon\\"><svg data-testid=\\"close-icon\\" aria-hidden=\\"true\\" class=\\"gl-icon s16\\"><use href=\\"#close\\"></use></svg></span></button></div>
             <!---->
           </label>
           <!---->
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ exports[`AlertsSettingsFormNew with default values renders the initial template
                 <!---->
                 <!----> <input id=\\"url\\" type=\\"text\\" readonly=\\"readonly\\" class=\\"gl-form-input form-control\\">
                 <div class=\\"input-group-append\\"><button title=\\"Copy\\" data-clipboard-text=\\"\\" aria-label=\\"Copy this value\\" type=\\"button\\" class=\\"btn gl-m-0! btn-default btn-md gl-button btn-default-secondary btn-icon\\">
-                    <!----> <svg data-testid=\\"copy-to-clipboard-icon\\" class=\\"gl-button-icon gl-icon s16\\">
+                    <!----> <svg data-testid=\\"copy-to-clipboard-icon\\" aria-hidden=\\"true\\" class=\\"gl-button-icon gl-icon s16\\">
                       <use href=\\"#copy-to-clipboard\\"></use>
                     </svg>
                     <!----></button></div>
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ exports[`AlertsSettingsFormNew with default values renders the initial template
                 <!---->
                 <!----> <input id=\\"authorization-key\\" type=\\"text\\" readonly=\\"readonly\\" class=\\"gl-form-input form-control\\">
                 <div class=\\"input-group-append\\"><button title=\\"Copy\\" data-clipboard-text=\\"\\" aria-label=\\"Copy this value\\" type=\\"button\\" class=\\"btn gl-m-0! btn-default btn-md gl-button btn-default-secondary btn-icon\\">
-                    <!----> <svg data-testid=\\"copy-to-clipboard-icon\\" class=\\"gl-button-icon gl-icon s16\\">
+                    <!----> <svg data-testid=\\"copy-to-clipboard-icon\\" aria-hidden=\\"true\\" class=\\"gl-button-icon gl-icon s16\\">
                       <use href=\\"#copy-to-clipboard\\"></use>
                     </svg>
                     <!----></button></div>
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ exports[`AlertsSettingsFormNew with default values renders the initial template
     <div class=\\"gl-display-flex gl-justify-content-start gl-py-3\\"><button data-testid=\\"integration-form-submit\\" type=\\"submit\\" class=\\"btn js-no-auto-disable btn-success btn-md gl-button\\">
         <!---->
         <!----> <span class=\\"gl-button-text\\">Save integration
-      </span></button> <button data-testid=\\"integration-test-and-submit\\" type=\\"button\\" class=\\"btn gl-mx-3 js-no-auto-disable btn-success btn-md gl-button btn-success-secondary\\">
+      </span></button> <button data-testid=\\"integration-test-and-submit\\" type=\\"button\\" disabled=\\"disabled\\" class=\\"btn gl-mx-3 js-no-auto-disable btn-success btn-md disabled gl-button btn-success-secondary\\">
         <!---->
         <!----> <span class=\\"gl-button-text\\">Save and test payload</span></button> <button type=\\"reset\\" class=\\"btn js-no-auto-disable btn-default btn-md gl-button\\">
         <!---->
diff --git a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_integrations_list_spec.js b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_integrations_list_spec.js
index 90bb38f0c2b..3a7392f64f7 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_integrations_list_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_integrations_list_spec.js
@@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ describe('AlertIntegrationsList', () => {
         integrations: mockIntegrations,
         ...props,
       },
-      provide: {
-        glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true },
-      },
       stubs: {
         GlIcon: true,
         GlButton: true,
diff --git a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_old_spec.js b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_old_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 3d0dfb44d63..00000000000
--- a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_old_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,204 +0,0 @@
-import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import { GlModal, GlAlert } from '@gitlab/ui';
-import AlertsSettingsForm from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_form_old.vue';
-import ToggleButton from '~/vue_shared/components/toggle_button.vue';
-import { i18n } from '~/alerts_settings/constants';
-import service from '~/alerts_settings/services';
-import { defaultAlertSettingsConfig } from './util';
-
-jest.mock('~/alerts_settings/services');
-
-describe('AlertsSettingsFormOld', () => {
-  let wrapper;
-
-  const createComponent = ({ methods } = {}, data) => {
-    wrapper = shallowMount(AlertsSettingsForm, {
-      data() {
-        return { ...data };
-      },
-      provide: {
-        ...defaultAlertSettingsConfig,
-      },
-      methods,
-    });
-  };
-
-  const findSelect = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="alert-settings-select"]');
-  const findJsonInput = () => wrapper.find('#alert-json');
-  const findUrl = () => wrapper.find('#url');
-  const findAuthorizationKey = () => wrapper.find('#authorization-key');
-  const findApiUrl = () => wrapper.find('#api-url');
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    setFixtures(`
-    <div>
-      <span class="js-service-active-status fa fa-circle" data-value="true"></span>
-      <span class="js-service-active-status fa fa-power-off" data-value="false"></span>
-    </div>`);
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    if (wrapper) {
-      wrapper.destroy();
-      wrapper = null;
-    }
-  });
-
-  describe('with default values', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      createComponent();
-    });
-
-    it('renders the initial template', () => {
-      expect(wrapper.html()).toMatchSnapshot();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('reset key', () => {
-    it('triggers resetKey method', () => {
-      const resetKey = jest.fn();
-      const methods = { resetKey };
-      createComponent({ methods });
-
-      wrapper.find(GlModal).vm.$emit('ok');
-
-      expect(resetKey).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-
-    it('updates the authorization key on success', () => {
-      createComponent(
-        {},
-        {
-          token: 'newToken',
-        },
-      );
-
-      expect(findAuthorizationKey().attributes('value')).toBe('newToken');
-    });
-
-    it('shows a alert message on error', () => {
-      service.updateGenericKey.mockRejectedValueOnce({});
-
-      createComponent();
-
-      return wrapper.vm.resetKey().then(() => {
-        expect(wrapper.find(GlAlert).exists()).toBe(true);
-      });
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('activate toggle', () => {
-    it('triggers toggleActivated method', () => {
-      const toggleService = jest.fn();
-      const methods = { toggleService };
-      createComponent({ methods });
-
-      wrapper.find(ToggleButton).vm.$emit('change', true);
-      expect(toggleService).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    });
-
-    describe('error is encountered', () => {
-      it('restores previous value', () => {
-        service.updateGenericKey.mockRejectedValueOnce({});
-        createComponent();
-        return wrapper.vm.resetKey().then(() => {
-          expect(wrapper.find(ToggleButton).props('value')).toBe(false);
-        });
-      });
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('prometheus is active', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      createComponent(
-        {},
-        {
-          selectedIntegration: 'PROMETHEUS',
-        },
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('renders a valid "select"', () => {
-      expect(findSelect().exists()).toBe(true);
-    });
-
-    it('shows the API URL input', () => {
-      expect(findApiUrl().exists()).toBe(true);
-    });
-
-    it('shows the correct default API URL', () => {
-      expect(findUrl().attributes('value')).toBe(defaultAlertSettingsConfig.prometheus.url);
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('Opsgenie is active', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      createComponent(
-        {},
-        {
-          selectedIntegration: 'OPSGENIE',
-        },
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('shows a input for the Opsgenie target URL', () => {
-      expect(findApiUrl().exists()).toBe(true);
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('trigger test alert', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      createComponent({});
-    });
-
-    it('should enable the JSON input', () => {
-      expect(findJsonInput().exists()).toBe(true);
-      expect(findJsonInput().props('value')).toBe(null);
-    });
-
-    it('should validate JSON input', async () => {
-      createComponent(true, {
-        testAlertJson: '{ "value": "test" }',
-      });
-
-      findJsonInput().vm.$emit('change');
-
-      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
-
-      expect(findJsonInput().attributes('state')).toBe('true');
-    });
-
-    describe('alert service is toggled', () => {
-      describe('error handling', () => {
-        const toggleService = true;
-
-        it('should show generic error', async () => {
-          service.updateGenericActive.mockRejectedValueOnce({});
-
-          createComponent();
-
-          await wrapper.vm.toggleActivated(toggleService);
-          expect(wrapper.vm.active).toBe(false);
-          expect(wrapper.find(GlAlert).attributes('variant')).toBe('danger');
-          expect(wrapper.find(GlAlert).text()).toBe(i18n.errorMsg);
-        });
-
-        it('should show first field specific error when available', async () => {
-          const err1 = "can't be blank";
-          const err2 = 'is not a valid URL';
-          const key = 'api_url';
-          service.updateGenericActive.mockRejectedValueOnce({
-            response: { data: { errors: { [key]: [err1, err2] } } },
-          });
-
-          createComponent();
-
-          await wrapper.vm.toggleActivated(toggleService);
-
-          expect(wrapper.find(GlAlert).text()).toContain(i18n.errorMsg);
-          expect(wrapper.find(GlAlert).text()).toContain(`${key} ${err1}`);
-        });
-      });
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_new_spec.js b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_spec.js
index fbd482b1906..dd7d32c5e75 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_new_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_form_spec.js
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import {
   GlFormTextarea,
 } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
-import AlertsSettingsForm from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_form_new.vue';
+import AlertsSettingsForm from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_form.vue';
 import { defaultAlertSettingsConfig } from './util';
 import { typeSet } from '~/alerts_settings/constants';
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_wrapper_spec.js b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_wrapper_spec.js
index 7384cf9a095..fe187d9e8f9 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_wrapper_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/alerts_settings/alerts_settings_wrapper_spec.js
@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 import VueApollo from 'vue-apollo';
 import { mount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import AxiosMockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
 import createMockApollo from 'jest/helpers/mock_apollo_helper';
 import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
-import { GlLoadingIcon, GlAlert } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { useMockIntersectionObserver } from 'helpers/mock_dom_observer';
+import { GlLoadingIcon, GlAlert } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
 import AlertsSettingsWrapper from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_wrapper.vue';
-import AlertsSettingsFormOld from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_form_old.vue';
-import AlertsSettingsFormNew from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_form_new.vue';
+import AlertsSettingsForm from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_settings_form.vue';
 import IntegrationsList from '~/alerts_settings/components/alerts_integrations_list.vue';
 import getIntegrationsQuery from '~/alerts_settings/graphql/queries/get_integrations.query.graphql';
 import createHttpIntegrationMutation from '~/alerts_settings/graphql/mutations/create_http_integration.mutation.graphql';
@@ -75,7 +76,6 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
       },
       provide: {
         ...defaultAlertSettingsConfig,
-        glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: false },
         ...provide,
       },
       mocks: {
@@ -110,39 +110,25 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
       apolloProvider: fakeApollo,
       provide: {
         ...defaultAlertSettingsConfig,
-        glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true },
       },
     });
   }
 
   afterEach(() => {
-    if (wrapper) {
-      wrapper.destroy();
-      wrapper = null;
-    }
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
   });
 
-  describe('with httpIntegrationsList feature flag disabled', () => {
-    it('renders data driven alerts integrations list and old form by default', () => {
-      createComponent();
-      expect(wrapper.find(IntegrationsList).exists()).toBe(true);
-      expect(wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormOld).exists()).toBe(true);
-      expect(wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).exists()).toBe(false);
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('with httpIntegrationsList feature flag enabled', () => {
+  describe('rendered via default permissions', () => {
     it('renders the GraphQL alerts integrations list and new form', () => {
-      createComponent({ provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } } });
+      createComponent();
       expect(wrapper.find(IntegrationsList).exists()).toBe(true);
-      expect(wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormOld).exists()).toBe(false);
-      expect(wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).exists()).toBe(true);
+      expect(wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('uses a loading state inside the IntegrationsList table', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: {} },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: true,
       });
       expect(wrapper.find(IntegrationsList).exists()).toBe(true);
@@ -152,7 +138,6 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('renders the IntegrationsList table using the API data', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
       expect(findLoader().exists()).toBe(false);
@@ -162,14 +147,13 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('calls `$apollo.mutate` with `createHttpIntegrationMutation`', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
         data: { createHttpIntegrationMutation: { integration: { id: '1' } } },
       });
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('create-new-integration', {
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('create-new-integration', {
         type: typeSet.http,
         variables: createHttpVariables,
       });
@@ -185,14 +169,13 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('calls `$apollo.mutate` with `updateHttpIntegrationMutation`', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
         data: { updateHttpIntegrationMutation: { integration: { id: '1' } } },
       });
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('update-integration', {
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('update-integration', {
         type: typeSet.http,
         variables: updateHttpVariables,
       });
@@ -206,14 +189,13 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('calls `$apollo.mutate` with `resetHttpTokenMutation`', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
         data: { resetHttpTokenMutation: { integration: { id: '1' } } },
       });
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('reset-token', {
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('reset-token', {
         type: typeSet.http,
         variables: { id: ID },
       });
@@ -229,14 +211,13 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('calls `$apollo.mutate` with `createPrometheusIntegrationMutation`', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
         data: { createPrometheusIntegrationMutation: { integration: { id: '2' } } },
       });
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('create-new-integration', {
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('create-new-integration', {
         type: typeSet.prometheus,
         variables: createPrometheusVariables,
       });
@@ -252,14 +233,13 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('calls `$apollo.mutate` with `updatePrometheusIntegrationMutation`', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
         data: { updatePrometheusIntegrationMutation: { integration: { id: '2' } } },
       });
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('update-integration', {
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('update-integration', {
         type: typeSet.prometheus,
         variables: updatePrometheusVariables,
       });
@@ -273,14 +253,13 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('calls `$apollo.mutate` with `resetPrometheusTokenMutation`', () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
         data: { resetPrometheusTokenMutation: { integration: { id: '1' } } },
       });
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('reset-token', {
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('reset-token', {
         type: typeSet.prometheus,
         variables: { id: ID },
       });
@@ -296,12 +275,11 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('shows an error alert when integration creation fails ', async () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockRejectedValue(ADD_INTEGRATION_ERROR);
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('create-new-integration', {});
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('create-new-integration', {});
 
       await waitForPromises();
 
@@ -311,13 +289,12 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('shows an error alert when integration token reset fails ', async () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockRejectedValue(RESET_INTEGRATION_TOKEN_ERROR);
 
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('reset-token', {});
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('reset-token', {});
 
       await waitForPromises();
       expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ message: RESET_INTEGRATION_TOKEN_ERROR });
@@ -326,30 +303,30 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it('shows an error alert when integration update fails ', async () => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
       jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm.$apollo, 'mutate').mockRejectedValue(errorMsg);
 
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('update-integration', {});
+      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsForm).vm.$emit('update-integration', {});
 
       await waitForPromises();
       expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ message: UPDATE_INTEGRATION_ERROR });
     });
 
     it('shows an error alert when integration test payload fails ', async () => {
+      const mock = new AxiosMockAdapter(axios);
+      mock.onPost(/(.*)/).replyOnce(403);
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
-      wrapper.find(AlertsSettingsFormNew).vm.$emit('test-payload-failure');
-
-      await waitForPromises();
-      expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ message: INTEGRATION_PAYLOAD_TEST_ERROR });
-      expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+      return wrapper.vm.validateAlertPayload({ endpoint: '', data: '', token: '' }).then(() => {
+        expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ message: INTEGRATION_PAYLOAD_TEST_ERROR });
+        expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+        mock.restore();
+      });
     });
   });
 
@@ -405,7 +382,7 @@ describe('AlertsSettingsWrapper', () => {
     it.each([true, false])('it shows/hides the alert when opsgenie is %s', active => {
       createComponent({
         data: { integrations: { list: mockIntegrations }, currentIntegration: mockIntegrations[0] },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { httpIntegrationsList: true }, opsgenie: { active } },
+        provide: { opsgenie: { active } },
         loading: false,
       });
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/blob/components/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/blob/components/mock_data.js
index 8cfcec2693c..95789ca13cb 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/blob/components/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/blob/components/mock_data.js
@@ -55,5 +55,3 @@ export const SimpleBlobContentMock = {
   path: 'foo.js',
   plainData: 'Plain',
 };
-
-export default {};
diff --git a/spec/frontend/boards/board_list_new_spec.js b/spec/frontend/boards/board_list_new_spec.js
index 55516e3fd56..585c0f37329 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/boards/board_list_new_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/boards/board_list_new_spec.js
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 /* global List */
-/* global ListIssue */
 
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { useFakeRequestAnimationFrame } from 'helpers/fake_request_animation_frame';
@@ -7,9 +6,8 @@ import { createLocalVue, mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import eventHub from '~/boards/eventhub';
 import BoardList from '~/boards/components/board_list_new.vue';
 import BoardCard from '~/boards/components/board_card.vue';
-import '~/boards/models/issue';
 import '~/boards/models/list';
-import { listObj, mockIssuesByListId, issues } from './mock_data';
+import { listObj, mockIssuesByListId, issues, mockIssues } from './mock_data';
 import defaultState from '~/boards/stores/state';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
@@ -52,7 +50,7 @@ const createComponent = ({
     ...listProps,
     doNotFetchIssues: true,
   });
-  const issue = new ListIssue({
+  const issue = {
     title: 'Testing',
     id: 1,
     iid: 1,
@@ -60,7 +58,7 @@ const createComponent = ({
     labels: [],
     assignees: [],
     ...listIssueProps,
-  });
+  };
   if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(listProps, 'issuesSize')) {
     list.issuesSize = 1;
   }
@@ -71,6 +69,7 @@ const createComponent = ({
       disabled: false,
       list,
       issues: [issue],
+      canAdminList: true,
       ...componentProps,
     },
     store,
@@ -87,17 +86,19 @@ const createComponent = ({
 
 describe('Board list component', () => {
   let wrapper;
+  const findByTestId = testId => wrapper.find(`[data-testid="${testId}"]`);
   useFakeRequestAnimationFrame();
 
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
   describe('When Expanded', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       wrapper = createComponent();
     });
 
-    afterEach(() => {
-      wrapper.destroy();
-    });
-
     it('renders component', () => {
       expect(wrapper.find('.board-list-component').exists()).toBe(true);
     });
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ describe('Board list component', () => {
         state: { listsFlags: { 'gid://gitlab/List/1': { isLoading: true } } },
       });
 
-      expect(wrapper.find('[data-testid="board_list_loading"').exists()).toBe(true);
+      expect(findByTestId('board_list_loading').exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('renders issues', () => {
@@ -171,19 +172,15 @@ describe('Board list component', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    afterEach(() => {
-      wrapper.destroy();
-    });
-
     it('loads more issues after scrolling', () => {
-      wrapper.vm.$refs.list.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
+      wrapper.vm.listRef.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
 
       expect(actions.fetchIssuesForList).toHaveBeenCalled();
     });
 
     it('does not load issues if already loading', () => {
-      wrapper.vm.$refs.list.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
-      wrapper.vm.$refs.list.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
+      wrapper.vm.listRef.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
+      wrapper.vm.listRef.dispatchEvent(new Event('scroll'));
 
       expect(actions.fetchIssuesForList).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
     });
@@ -204,10 +201,6 @@ describe('Board list component', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    afterEach(() => {
-      wrapper.destroy();
-    });
-
     describe('when issue count exceeds max issue count', () => {
       it('sets background to bg-danger-100', async () => {
         wrapper.setProps({ list: { issuesSize: 4, maxIssueCount: 3 } });
@@ -233,4 +226,43 @@ describe('Board list component', () => {
       });
     });
   });
+
+  describe('drag & drop issue', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      wrapper = createComponent();
+    });
+
+    describe('handleDragOnStart', () => {
+      it('adds a class `is-dragging` to document body', () => {
+        expect(document.body.classList.contains('is-dragging')).toBe(false);
+
+        findByTestId('tree-root-wrapper').vm.$emit('start');
+
+        expect(document.body.classList.contains('is-dragging')).toBe(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('handleDragOnEnd', () => {
+      it('removes class `is-dragging` from document body', () => {
+        jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm, 'moveIssue').mockImplementation(() => {});
+        document.body.classList.add('is-dragging');
+
+        findByTestId('tree-root-wrapper').vm.$emit('end', {
+          oldIndex: 1,
+          newIndex: 0,
+          item: {
+            dataset: {
+              issueId: mockIssues[0].id,
+              issueIid: mockIssues[0].iid,
+              issuePath: mockIssues[0].referencePath,
+            },
+          },
+          to: { children: [], dataset: { listId: 'gid://gitlab/List/1' } },
+          from: { dataset: { listId: 'gid://gitlab/List/2' } },
+        });
+
+        expect(document.body.classList.contains('is-dragging')).toBe(false);
+      });
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/boards/components/board_assignee_dropdown_spec.js b/spec/frontend/boards/components/board_assignee_dropdown_spec.js
index e185a6d5419..5ddd00f7fd4 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/boards/components/board_assignee_dropdown_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/boards/components/board_assignee_dropdown_spec.js
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 import { mount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import { GlDropdownItem, GlAvatarLink, GlAvatarLabeled, GlSearchBoxByType } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import {
+  GlDropdownItem,
+  GlAvatarLink,
+  GlAvatarLabeled,
+  GlSearchBoxByType,
+  GlLoadingIcon,
+} from '@gitlab/ui';
 import createMockApollo from 'jest/helpers/mock_apollo_helper';
 import VueApollo from 'vue-apollo';
 import BoardAssigneeDropdown from '~/boards/components/board_assignee_dropdown.vue';
@@ -20,12 +26,13 @@ describe('BoardCardAssigneeDropdown', () => {
   let fakeApollo;
   let getIssueParticipantsSpy;
   let getSearchUsersSpy;
+  let dispatchSpy;
 
   const iid = '111';
   const activeIssueName = 'test';
   const anotherIssueName = 'hello';
 
-  const createComponent = (search = '') => {
+  const createComponent = (search = '', loading = false) => {
     wrapper = mount(BoardAssigneeDropdown, {
       data() {
         return {
@@ -39,6 +46,15 @@ describe('BoardCardAssigneeDropdown', () => {
         canUpdate: true,
         rootPath: '',
       },
+      mocks: {
+        $apollo: {
+          queries: {
+            participants: {
+              loading,
+            },
+          },
+        },
+      },
     });
   };
 
@@ -82,6 +98,8 @@ describe('BoardCardAssigneeDropdown', () => {
     return wrapper.findAll(GlDropdownItem).wrappers.find(node => node.text().indexOf(text) === 0);
   };
 
+  const findLoadingIcon = () => wrapper.find(GlLoadingIcon);
+
   beforeEach(() => {
     store.state.activeId = '1';
     store.state.issues = {
@@ -91,10 +109,11 @@ describe('BoardCardAssigneeDropdown', () => {
       },
     };
 
-    jest.spyOn(store, 'dispatch').mockResolvedValue();
+    dispatchSpy = jest.spyOn(store, 'dispatch').mockResolvedValue();
   });
 
   afterEach(() => {
+    window.gon = {};
     jest.restoreAllMocks();
   });
 
@@ -243,6 +262,30 @@ describe('BoardCardAssigneeDropdown', () => {
     },
   );
 
+  describe('when participants is loading', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      createComponent('', true);
+    });
+
+    it('finds a loading icon in the dropdown', () => {
+      expect(findLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when participants is loading is false', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      createComponent();
+    });
+
+    it('does not find GlLoading icon in the dropdown', () => {
+      expect(findLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    it('finds at least 1 GlDropdownItem', () => {
+      expect(wrapper.findAll(GlDropdownItem).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('Apollo', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       getIssueParticipantsSpy = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({
@@ -305,4 +348,25 @@ describe('BoardCardAssigneeDropdown', () => {
 
     expect(wrapper.find(GlSearchBoxByType).exists()).toBe(true);
   });
+
+  describe('when assign-self is emitted from IssuableAssignees', () => {
+    const currentUser = { username: 'self', name: '', id: '' };
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      window.gon = { current_username: currentUser.username };
+
+      dispatchSpy.mockResolvedValue([currentUser]);
+      createComponent();
+
+      wrapper.find(IssuableAssignees).vm.$emit('assign-self');
+    });
+
+    it('calls setAssignees with currentUser', () => {
+      expect(store.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('setAssignees', currentUser.username);
+    });
+
+    it('adds the user to the selected list', async () => {
+      expect(findByText(currentUser.username).exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/boards/components/sidebar/board_sidebar_milestone_select_spec.js b/spec/frontend/boards/components/sidebar/board_sidebar_milestone_select_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..74d88d9f34c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/boards/components/sidebar/board_sidebar_milestone_select_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlLoadingIcon } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { mockMilestone as TEST_MILESTONE } from 'jest/boards/mock_data';
+import BoardSidebarMilestoneSelect from '~/boards/components/sidebar/board_sidebar_milestone_select.vue';
+import BoardEditableItem from '~/boards/components/sidebar/board_editable_item.vue';
+import { createStore } from '~/boards/stores';
+import createFlash from '~/flash';
+
+const TEST_ISSUE = { id: 'gid://gitlab/Issue/1', iid: 9, referencePath: 'h/b#2' };
+
+jest.mock('~/flash');
+
+describe('~/boards/components/sidebar/board_sidebar_milestone_select.vue', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+  let store;
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    store = null;
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  const createWrapper = ({ milestone = null } = {}) => {
+    store = createStore();
+    store.state.issues = { [TEST_ISSUE.id]: { ...TEST_ISSUE, milestone } };
+    store.state.activeId = TEST_ISSUE.id;
+
+    wrapper = shallowMount(BoardSidebarMilestoneSelect, {
+      store,
+      provide: {
+        canUpdate: true,
+      },
+      data: () => ({
+        milestones: [TEST_MILESTONE],
+      }),
+      stubs: {
+        'board-editable-item': BoardEditableItem,
+      },
+      mocks: {
+        $apollo: {
+          loading: false,
+        },
+      },
+    });
+  };
+
+  const findCollapsed = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="collapsed-content"]');
+  const findLoader = () => wrapper.find(GlLoadingIcon);
+  const findDropdownItem = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="milestone-item"]');
+  const findUnsetMilestoneItem = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="no-milestone-item"]');
+  const findNoMilestonesFoundItem = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="no-milestones-found"]');
+
+  it('renders "None" when no milestone is selected', () => {
+    createWrapper();
+
+    expect(findCollapsed().text()).toBe('None');
+  });
+
+  it('renders milestone title when set', () => {
+    createWrapper({ milestone: TEST_MILESTONE });
+
+    expect(findCollapsed().text()).toContain(TEST_MILESTONE.title);
+  });
+
+  it('shows loader while Apollo is loading', async () => {
+    createWrapper({ milestone: TEST_MILESTONE });
+
+    expect(findLoader().exists()).toBe(false);
+
+    wrapper.vm.$apollo.loading = true;
+    await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+
+    expect(findLoader().exists()).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('shows message when error or no milestones found', async () => {
+    createWrapper();
+
+    wrapper.setData({ milestones: [] });
+    await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+
+    expect(findNoMilestonesFoundItem().text()).toBe('No milestones found');
+  });
+
+  describe('when milestone is selected', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      createWrapper();
+
+      jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm, 'setActiveIssueMilestone').mockImplementation(() => {
+        store.state.issues[TEST_ISSUE.id].milestone = TEST_MILESTONE;
+      });
+      findDropdownItem().vm.$emit('click');
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+    });
+
+    it('collapses sidebar and renders selected milestone', () => {
+      expect(findCollapsed().isVisible()).toBe(true);
+      expect(findCollapsed().text()).toContain(TEST_MILESTONE.title);
+    });
+
+    it('commits change to the server', () => {
+      expect(wrapper.vm.setActiveIssueMilestone).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+        milestoneId: TEST_MILESTONE.id,
+        projectPath: 'h/b',
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when milestone is set to "None"', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      createWrapper({ milestone: TEST_MILESTONE });
+
+      jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm, 'setActiveIssueMilestone').mockImplementation(() => {
+        store.state.issues[TEST_ISSUE.id].milestone = null;
+      });
+      findUnsetMilestoneItem().vm.$emit('click');
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+    });
+
+    it('collapses sidebar and renders "None"', () => {
+      expect(findCollapsed().isVisible()).toBe(true);
+      expect(findCollapsed().text()).toBe('None');
+    });
+
+    it('commits change to the server', () => {
+      expect(wrapper.vm.setActiveIssueMilestone).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+        milestoneId: null,
+        projectPath: 'h/b',
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when the mutation fails', () => {
+    const testMilestone = { id: '1', title: 'Former milestone' };
+
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      createWrapper({ milestone: testMilestone });
+
+      jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm, 'setActiveIssueMilestone').mockImplementation(() => {
+        throw new Error(['failed mutation']);
+      });
+      findDropdownItem().vm.$emit('click');
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+    });
+
+    it('collapses sidebar and renders former milestone', () => {
+      expect(findCollapsed().isVisible()).toBe(true);
+      expect(findCollapsed().text()).toContain(testMilestone.title);
+      expect(createFlash).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/boards/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/boards/mock_data.js
index 58f67231d55..a81db9c8404 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/boards/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/boards/mock_data.js
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
-/* global ListIssue */
 /* global List */
 
 import Vue from 'vue';
 import { keyBy } from 'lodash';
 import '~/boards/models/list';
-import '~/boards/models/issue';
 import boardsStore from '~/boards/stores/boards_store';
 
 export const boardObj = {
@@ -184,8 +182,6 @@ export const mockActiveIssue = {
   emailsDisabled: false,
 };
 
-export const mockIssueWithModel = new ListIssue(mockIssue);
-
 export const mockIssue2 = {
   id: 'gid://gitlab/Issue/437',
   iid: 28,
@@ -203,8 +199,6 @@ export const mockIssue2 = {
   },
 };
 
-export const mockIssue2WithModel = new ListIssue(mockIssue2);
-
 export const mockIssue3 = {
   id: 'gid://gitlab/Issue/438',
   iid: 29,
diff --git a/spec/frontend/boards/stores/actions_spec.js b/spec/frontend/boards/stores/actions_spec.js
index 4d529580a7a..f168e427431 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/boards/stores/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/boards/stores/actions_spec.js
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ import {
   mockLists,
   mockListsById,
   mockIssue,
-  mockIssueWithModel,
-  mockIssue2WithModel,
+  mockIssue2,
   rawIssue,
   mockIssues,
+  mockMilestone,
   labels,
   mockActiveIssue,
 } from '../mock_data';
@@ -499,8 +499,8 @@ describe('moveIssue', () => {
   };
 
   const issues = {
-    '436': mockIssueWithModel,
-    '437': mockIssue2WithModel,
+    '436': mockIssue,
+    '437': mockIssue2,
   };
 
   const state = {
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ describe('moveIssue', () => {
         {
           type: types.MOVE_ISSUE,
           payload: {
-            originalIssue: mockIssueWithModel,
+            originalIssue: mockIssue,
             fromListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/1',
             toListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/2',
           },
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ describe('moveIssue', () => {
         {
           type: types.MOVE_ISSUE,
           payload: {
-            originalIssue: mockIssueWithModel,
+            originalIssue: mockIssue,
             fromListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/1',
             toListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/2',
           },
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ describe('moveIssue', () => {
         {
           type: types.MOVE_ISSUE_FAILURE,
           payload: {
-            originalIssue: mockIssueWithModel,
+            originalIssue: mockIssue,
             fromListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/1',
             toListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/2',
             originalIndex: 0,
@@ -885,6 +885,60 @@ describe('setActiveIssueSubscribed', () => {
   });
 });
 
+describe('setActiveIssueMilestone', () => {
+  const state = { issues: { [mockIssue.id]: mockIssue } };
+  const getters = { activeIssue: mockIssue };
+  const testMilestone = {
+    ...mockMilestone,
+    id: 'gid://gitlab/Milestone/1',
+  };
+  const input = {
+    milestoneId: testMilestone.id,
+    projectPath: 'h/b',
+  };
+
+  it('should commit milestone after setting the issue', done => {
+    jest.spyOn(gqlClient, 'mutate').mockResolvedValue({
+      data: {
+        updateIssue: {
+          issue: {
+            milestone: testMilestone,
+          },
+          errors: [],
+        },
+      },
+    });
+
+    const payload = {
+      issueId: getters.activeIssue.id,
+      prop: 'milestone',
+      value: testMilestone,
+    };
+
+    testAction(
+      actions.setActiveIssueMilestone,
+      input,
+      { ...state, ...getters },
+      [
+        {
+          type: types.UPDATE_ISSUE_BY_ID,
+          payload,
+        },
+      ],
+      [],
+      done,
+    );
+  });
+
+  it('throws error if fails', async () => {
+    jest
+      .spyOn(gqlClient, 'mutate')
+      .mockResolvedValue({ data: { updateIssue: { errors: ['failed mutation'] } } });
+
+    await expect(actions.setActiveIssueMilestone({ getters }, input)).rejects.toThrow(Error);
+  });
+});
+
 describe('fetchBacklog', () => {
   expectNotImplemented(actions.fetchBacklog);
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/boards/stores/mutations_spec.js b/spec/frontend/boards/stores/mutations_spec.js
index e1e57a8fd43..65b37007b5c 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/boards/stores/mutations_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/boards/stores/mutations_spec.js
@@ -1,15 +1,7 @@
 import mutations from '~/boards/stores/mutations';
 import * as types from '~/boards/stores/mutation_types';
 import defaultState from '~/boards/stores/state';
-import {
-  mockListsWithModel,
-  mockLists,
-  rawIssue,
-  mockIssue,
-  mockIssue2,
-  mockIssueWithModel,
-  mockIssue2WithModel,
-} from '../mock_data';
+import { mockListsWithModel, mockLists, rawIssue, mockIssue, mockIssue2 } from '../mock_data';
 
 const expectNotImplemented = action => {
   it('is not implemented', () => {
@@ -355,8 +347,8 @@ describe('Board Store Mutations', () => {
       };
 
       const issues = {
-        '1': mockIssueWithModel,
-        '2': mockIssue2WithModel,
+        '1': mockIssue,
+        '2': mockIssue2,
       };
 
       state = {
@@ -367,7 +359,7 @@ describe('Board Store Mutations', () => {
       };
 
       mutations.MOVE_ISSUE(state, {
-        originalIssue: mockIssue2WithModel,
+        originalIssue: mockIssue2,
         fromListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/1',
         toListId: 'gid://gitlab/List/2',
       });
@@ -396,7 +388,7 @@ describe('Board Store Mutations', () => {
         issue: rawIssue,
       });
 
-      expect(state.issues).toEqual({ '436': { ...mockIssueWithModel, id: 436 } });
+      expect(state.issues).toEqual({ '436': { ...mockIssue, id: 436 } });
     });
   });
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/clusters/components/__snapshots__/remove_cluster_confirmation_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/clusters/components/__snapshots__/remove_cluster_confirmation_spec.js.snap
index de40e03b598..6f28573c808 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/clusters/components/__snapshots__/remove_cluster_confirmation_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/clusters/components/__snapshots__/remove_cluster_confirmation_spec.js.snap
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ exports[`Remove cluster confirmation modal renders splitbutton with modal includ
           type="button"
         >
           <svg
+            aria-hidden="true"
             class="gl-icon s16 gl-new-dropdown-item-check-icon"
             data-testid="mobile-issue-close-icon"
           >
@@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ exports[`Remove cluster confirmation modal renders splitbutton with modal includ
           type="button"
         >
           <svg
+            aria-hidden="true"
             class="gl-icon s16 gl-new-dropdown-item-check-icon gl-visibility-hidden"
             data-testid="mobile-issue-close-icon"
           >
diff --git a/spec/frontend/clusters/stores/clusters_store_spec.js b/spec/frontend/clusters/stores/clusters_store_spec.js
index ed862818c7b..381a4717127 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/clusters/stores/clusters_store_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/clusters/stores/clusters_store_spec.js
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ describe('Clusters Store', () => {
 
       expect(store.state).toEqual({
         helpPath: null,
+        helmHelpPath: null,
         ingressHelpPath: null,
         environmentsHelpPath: null,
         clustersHelpPath: null,
@@ -62,7 +63,7 @@ describe('Clusters Store', () => {
         rbac: false,
         applications: {
           helm: {
-            title: 'Helm Tiller',
+            title: 'Legacy Helm Tiller server',
             status: mockResponseData.applications[0].status,
             statusReason: mockResponseData.applications[0].status_reason,
             requestReason: null,
diff --git a/spec/frontend/code_navigation/components/__snapshots__/popover_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/code_navigation/components/__snapshots__/popover_spec.js.snap
index 62e527a2c5f..b59d1597a12 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/code_navigation/components/__snapshots__/popover_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/code_navigation/components/__snapshots__/popover_spec.js.snap
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ exports[`Code navigation popover component renders popover 1`] = `
   >
     <gl-tab-stub
       title="Definition"
+      titlelinkclass=""
     >
       <div
         class="overflow-auto code-navigation-popover-container"
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ exports[`Code navigation popover component renders popover 1`] = `
     <gl-tab-stub
       class="py-2"
       data-testid="references-tab"
+      titlelinkclass=""
     >
        
       <p
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/app_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/app_spec.js
index 225710eab63..3f7d4bfe9f1 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/app_spec.js
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ import HiddenFilesWarning from '~/diffs/components/hidden_files_warning.vue';
 import CollapsedFilesWarning from '~/diffs/components/collapsed_files_warning.vue';
 import CommitWidget from '~/diffs/components/commit_widget.vue';
 import TreeList from '~/diffs/components/tree_list.vue';
-import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants';
 import createDiffsStore from '../create_diffs_store';
 import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
 import * as urlUtils from '~/lib/utils/url_utility';
@@ -75,12 +74,6 @@ describe('diffs/components/app', () => {
     });
   }
 
-  function getOppositeViewType(currentViewType) {
-    return currentViewType === INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE
-      ? PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE
-      : INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE;
-  }
-
   beforeEach(() => {
     // setup globals (needed for component to mount :/)
     window.mrTabs = {
@@ -125,104 +118,6 @@ describe('diffs/components/app', () => {
       wrapper.vm.$nextTick(done);
     });
 
-    describe('when the diff view type changes and it should load a single diff view style', () => {
-      const noLinesDiff = {
-        highlighted_diff_lines: [],
-        parallel_diff_lines: [],
-      };
-      const parallelLinesDiff = {
-        highlighted_diff_lines: [],
-        parallel_diff_lines: ['line'],
-      };
-      const inlineLinesDiff = {
-        highlighted_diff_lines: ['line'],
-        parallel_diff_lines: [],
-      };
-      const fullDiff = {
-        highlighted_diff_lines: ['line'],
-        parallel_diff_lines: ['line'],
-      };
-
-      function expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance, done = () => {}, existingFiles = 1 } = {}) {
-        vueInstance.$nextTick(() => {
-          expect(vueInstance.diffFiles.length).toEqual(existingFiles);
-          expect(vueInstance.fetchDiffFilesBatch).toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-          done();
-        });
-      }
-
-      it('fetches diffs if it has none', done => {
-        wrapper.vm.isLatestVersion = () => false;
-
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, existingFiles: 0, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches diffs if it has both view styles, but no lines in either', done => {
-        wrapper.vm.isLatestVersion = () => false;
-
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(noLinesDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches diffs if it only has inline view style', done => {
-        wrapper.vm.isLatestVersion = () => false;
-
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(inlineLinesDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches diffs if it only has parallel view style', done => {
-        wrapper.vm.isLatestVersion = () => false;
-
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(parallelLinesDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches batch diffs if it has none', done => {
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, existingFiles: 0, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches batch diffs if it has both view styles, but no lines in either', done => {
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(noLinesDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches batch diffs if it only has inline view style', done => {
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(inlineLinesDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, done });
-      });
-
-      it('fetches batch diffs if it only has parallel view style', done => {
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(parallelLinesDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expectFetchToOccur({ vueInstance: wrapper.vm, done });
-      });
-
-      it('does not fetch batch diffs if it has already fetched both styles of diff', () => {
-        store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push(fullDiff);
-        store.state.diffs.diffViewType = getOppositeViewType(wrapper.vm.diffViewType);
-
-        expect(wrapper.vm.diffFiles.length).toEqual(1);
-        expect(wrapper.vm.fetchDiffFilesBatch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-      });
-    });
-
     it('calls batch methods if diffsBatchLoad is enabled, and not latest version', done => {
       expect(wrapper.vm.diffFilesLength).toEqual(0);
       wrapper.vm.isLatestVersion = () => false;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js
index 9e4fcddd1b4..8a7eb6aaca6 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ describe('diffs/components/commit_item', () => {
 
     it('renders commit sha', () => {
       const shaElement = getShaElement();
-      const labelElement = shaElement.find('[data-testid="commit-sha-group"] button');
+      const labelElement = shaElement.find('[data-testid="commit-sha-short-id"]');
       const buttonElement = shaElement.find('button.input-group-text');
 
       expect(labelElement.text()).toEqual(commit.short_id);
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js
index e3a6f7f16a9..c0532e392d1 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ import DiffDiscussions from '~/diffs/components/diff_discussions.vue';
 import { IMAGE_DIFF_POSITION_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants';
 import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
 import { diffViewerModes } from '~/ide/constants';
-import { diffLines } from '~/diffs/store/getters';
 import DiffView from '~/diffs/components/diff_view.vue';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
@@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ describe('DiffContent', () => {
             isInlineView: isInlineViewGetterMock,
             isParallelView: isParallelViewGetterMock,
             getCommentFormForDiffFile: getCommentFormForDiffFileGetterMock,
-            diffLines,
+            diffLines: () => () => [...diffFileMockData.parallel_diff_lines],
           },
           actions: {
             saveDiffDiscussion: saveDiffDiscussionMock,
@@ -122,11 +121,11 @@ describe('DiffContent', () => {
       expect(wrapper.find(ParallelDiffView).exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
-    it('should render diff view if `unifiedDiffLines` & `unifiedDiffComponents` are true', () => {
+    it('should render diff view if `unifiedDiffComponents` are true', () => {
       isParallelViewGetterMock.mockReturnValue(true);
       createComponent({
         props: { diffFile: textDiffFile },
-        provide: { glFeatures: { unifiedDiffLines: true, unifiedDiffComponents: true } },
+        provide: { glFeatures: { unifiedDiffComponents: true } },
       });
 
       expect(wrapper.find(DiffView).exists()).toBe(true);
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_expansion_cell_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_expansion_cell_spec.js
index 81e08f09f62..a3b4b5c3abb 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_expansion_cell_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/components/diff_expansion_cell_spec.js
@@ -5,18 +5,16 @@ import { getByText } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { createStore } from '~/mr_notes/stores';
 import DiffExpansionCell from '~/diffs/components/diff_expansion_cell.vue';
 import { getPreviousLineIndex } from '~/diffs/store/utils';
-import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants';
+import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants';
 import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
 
 const EXPAND_UP_CLASS = '.js-unfold';
 const EXPAND_DOWN_CLASS = '.js-unfold-down';
 const lineSources = {
   [INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE]: 'highlighted_diff_lines',
-  [PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE]: 'parallel_diff_lines',
 };
 const lineHandlers = {
   [INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE]: line => line,
-  [PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE]: line => line.right || line.left,
 };
 
 function makeLoadMoreLinesPayload({
@@ -126,7 +124,6 @@ describe('DiffExpansionCell', () => {
   describe('any row', () => {
     [
       { diffViewType: INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, lineIndex: 8, file: { parallel_diff_lines: [] } },
-      { diffViewType: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, lineIndex: 7, file: { highlighted_diff_lines: [] } },
     ].forEach(({ diffViewType, file, lineIndex }) => {
       describe(`with diffViewType (${diffViewType})`, () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/store/actions_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/store/actions_spec.js
index 0af5ddd9764..f010e88a1a7 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/store/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/store/actions_spec.js
@@ -1236,10 +1236,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
         { diffViewType: 'inline' },
         [
           {
-            type: 'SET_HIDDEN_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES',
-            payload: { filePath: 'path', lines: ['test'] },
-          },
-          {
             type: 'SET_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES',
             payload: { filePath: 'path', lines: ['test'] },
           },
@@ -1259,10 +1255,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
         { diffViewType: 'inline' },
         [
           {
-            type: 'SET_HIDDEN_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES',
-            payload: { filePath: 'path', lines },
-          },
-          {
             type: 'SET_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES',
             payload: { filePath: 'path', lines: lines.slice(0, 200) },
           },
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js
index c0645faf89e..ae23cea157d 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import createState from '~/diffs/store/modules/diff_state';
 import mutations from '~/diffs/store/mutations';
 import * as types from '~/diffs/store/mutation_types';
-import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants';
+import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY } from '~/diffs/constants';
 import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
 import * as utils from '~/diffs/store/utils';
 
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
           {
             content_sha: diffFileMockData.content_sha,
             file_hash: diffFileMockData.file_hash,
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [],
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [],
           },
         ],
       };
@@ -84,11 +84,11 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
 
       mutations[types.SET_DIFF_DATA](state, diffMock);
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines).toBeUndefined();
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]).toEqual([]);
     });
   });
 
-  describe('SET_DIFFSET_DIFF_DATA_BATCH_DATA', () => {
+  describe('SET_DIFF_DATA_BATCH_DATA', () => {
     it('should set diff data batch type properly', () => {
       const state = { diffFiles: [] };
       const diffMock = {
@@ -97,9 +97,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
 
       mutations[types.SET_DIFF_DATA_BATCH](state, diffMock);
 
-      const firstLine = state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0];
-
-      expect(firstLine.right.text).toBeUndefined();
       expect(state.diffFiles[0].renderIt).toEqual(true);
       expect(state.diffFiles[0].collapsed).toEqual(false);
     });
@@ -142,8 +139,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
       };
       const diffFile = {
         file_hash: options.fileHash,
-        highlighted_diff_lines: [],
-        parallel_diff_lines: [],
+        [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [],
       };
       const state = { diffFiles: [diffFile], diffViewType: 'viewType' };
       const lines = [{ old_line: 1, new_line: 1 }];
@@ -171,9 +167,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
       );
 
       expect(utils.addContextLines).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-        inlineLines: diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines,
-        parallelLines: diffFile.parallel_diff_lines,
-        diffViewType: 'viewType',
+        inlineLines: diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY],
         contextLines: options.contextLines,
         bottom: options.params.bottom,
         lineNumbers: options.lineNumbers,
@@ -225,19 +219,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            parallel_diff_lines: [
-              {
-                left: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-                right: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_2',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-              },
-            ],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [],
@@ -267,12 +249,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].right.discussions).toEqual([]);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
     });
 
     it('should not duplicate discussions on line', () => {
@@ -291,19 +269,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            parallel_diff_lines: [
-              {
-                left: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-                right: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_2',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-              },
-            ],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [],
@@ -333,24 +299,16 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].right.discussions).toEqual([]);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
 
       mutations[types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE](state, {
         discussion,
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].right.discussions).toEqual([]);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
     });
 
     it('updates existing discussion', () => {
@@ -369,19 +327,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            parallel_diff_lines: [
-              {
-                left: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-                right: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_2',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-              },
-            ],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [],
@@ -411,12 +357,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].right.discussions).toEqual([]);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
 
       mutations[types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE](state, {
         discussion: {
@@ -427,11 +369,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].notes.length).toBe(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].notes.length).toBe(1);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].resolved).toBe(true);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].resolved).toBe(true);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].notes.length).toBe(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].resolved).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should not duplicate inline diff discussions', () => {
@@ -450,7 +389,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [
@@ -472,7 +411,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
                 discussions: [],
               },
             ],
-            parallel_diff_lines: [],
           },
         ],
       };
@@ -497,7 +435,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toBe(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toBe(1);
     });
 
     it('should add legacy discussions to the given line', () => {
@@ -517,19 +455,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            parallel_diff_lines: [
-              {
-                left: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-                right: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-              },
-            ],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [],
@@ -557,11 +483,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toEqual(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].id).toEqual(1);
     });
 
     it('should add discussions by line_codes and positions attributes', () => {
@@ -580,19 +503,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            parallel_diff_lines: [
-              {
-                left: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-                right: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-              },
-            ],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [],
@@ -624,11 +535,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffPositionByLineCode,
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions).toHaveLength(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions[0].id).toBe(1);
-
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions).toHaveLength(1);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions[0].id).toBe(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions).toHaveLength(1);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions[0].id).toBe(1);
     });
 
     it('should add discussion to file', () => {
@@ -638,8 +546,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
             discussions: [],
-            parallel_diff_lines: [],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [],
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [],
           },
         ],
       };
@@ -668,30 +575,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         diffFiles: [
           {
             file_hash: 'ABC',
-            parallel_diff_lines: [
-              {
-                left: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [
-                    {
-                      id: 1,
-                      line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                      notes: [],
-                    },
-                    {
-                      id: 2,
-                      line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                      notes: [],
-                    },
-                  ],
-                },
-                right: {
-                  line_code: 'ABC_1',
-                  discussions: [],
-                },
-              },
-            ],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
               {
                 line_code: 'ABC_1',
                 discussions: [
@@ -717,8 +601,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         lineCode: 'ABC_1',
       });
 
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(0);
-      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(0);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].discussions.length).toEqual(0);
     });
   });
 
@@ -776,11 +659,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
     it('sets hasForm on lines', () => {
       const file = {
         file_hash: 'hash',
-        parallel_diff_lines: [
-          { left: { line_code: '123', hasForm: false }, right: {} },
-          { left: {}, right: { line_code: '124', hasForm: false } },
-        ],
-        highlighted_diff_lines: [
+        [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [
           { line_code: '123', hasForm: false },
           { line_code: '124', hasForm: false },
         ],
@@ -795,11 +674,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
         fileHash: 'hash',
       });
 
-      expect(file.highlighted_diff_lines[0].hasForm).toBe(true);
-      expect(file.highlighted_diff_lines[1].hasForm).toBe(false);
-
-      expect(file.parallel_diff_lines[0].left.hasForm).toBe(true);
-      expect(file.parallel_diff_lines[1].right.hasForm).toBe(false);
+      expect(file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0].hasForm).toBe(true);
+      expect(file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][1].hasForm).toBe(false);
     });
   });
 
@@ -885,8 +761,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
             file_path: 'test',
             isLoadingFullFile: true,
             isShowingFullFile: false,
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [],
-            parallel_diff_lines: [],
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [],
           },
         ],
       };
@@ -903,8 +778,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
             file_path: 'test',
             isLoadingFullFile: true,
             isShowingFullFile: false,
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [],
-            parallel_diff_lines: [],
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [],
           },
         ],
       };
@@ -927,80 +801,42 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('SET_HIDDEN_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES', () => {
-    [
-      { current: 'highlighted', hidden: 'parallel', diffViewType: 'inline' },
-      { current: 'parallel', hidden: 'highlighted', diffViewType: 'parallel' },
-    ].forEach(({ current, hidden, diffViewType }) => {
-      it(`sets the ${hidden} lines when diff view is ${diffViewType}`, () => {
-        const file = { file_path: 'test', parallel_diff_lines: [], highlighted_diff_lines: [] };
-        const state = {
-          diffFiles: [file],
-          diffViewType,
-        };
-
-        mutations[types.SET_HIDDEN_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
-          filePath: 'test',
-          lines: ['test'],
-        });
-
-        expect(file[`${current}_diff_lines`]).toEqual([]);
-        expect(file[`${hidden}_diff_lines`]).toEqual(['test']);
-      });
-    });
-  });
-
   describe('SET_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES', () => {
-    [
-      { current: 'highlighted', hidden: 'parallel', diffViewType: 'inline' },
-      { current: 'parallel', hidden: 'highlighted', diffViewType: 'parallel' },
-    ].forEach(({ current, hidden, diffViewType }) => {
-      it(`sets the ${current} lines when diff view is ${diffViewType}`, () => {
-        const file = { file_path: 'test', parallel_diff_lines: [], highlighted_diff_lines: [] };
-        const state = {
-          diffFiles: [file],
-          diffViewType,
-        };
-
-        mutations[types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
-          filePath: 'test',
-          lines: ['test'],
-        });
-
-        expect(file[`${current}_diff_lines`]).toEqual(['test']);
-        expect(file[`${hidden}_diff_lines`]).toEqual([]);
+    it(`sets the highlighted lines`, () => {
+      const file = { file_path: 'test', [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [] };
+      const state = {
+        diffFiles: [file],
+      };
+
+      mutations[types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
+        filePath: 'test',
+        lines: ['test'],
       });
+
+      expect(file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]).toEqual(['test']);
     });
   });
 
   describe('ADD_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES', () => {
-    [
-      { current: 'highlighted', hidden: 'parallel', diffViewType: 'inline' },
-      { current: 'parallel', hidden: 'highlighted', diffViewType: 'parallel' },
-    ].forEach(({ current, hidden, diffViewType }) => {
-      it(`pushes to ${current} lines when diff view is ${diffViewType}`, () => {
-        const file = { file_path: 'test', parallel_diff_lines: [], highlighted_diff_lines: [] };
-        const state = {
-          diffFiles: [file],
-          diffViewType,
-        };
-
-        mutations[types.ADD_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
-          filePath: 'test',
-          line: 'test',
-        });
-
-        expect(file[`${current}_diff_lines`]).toEqual(['test']);
-        expect(file[`${hidden}_diff_lines`]).toEqual([]);
-
-        mutations[types.ADD_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
-          filePath: 'test',
-          line: 'test2',
-        });
-
-        expect(file[`${current}_diff_lines`]).toEqual(['test', 'test2']);
-        expect(file[`${hidden}_diff_lines`]).toEqual([]);
+    it('pushes to inline lines', () => {
+      const file = { file_path: 'test', [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [] };
+      const state = {
+        diffFiles: [file],
+      };
+
+      mutations[types.ADD_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
+        filePath: 'test',
+        line: 'test',
       });
+
+      expect(file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]).toEqual(['test']);
+
+      mutations[types.ADD_CURRENT_VIEW_DIFF_FILE_LINES](state, {
+        filePath: 'test',
+        line: 'test2',
+      });
+
+      expect(file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]).toEqual(['test', 'test2']);
     });
   });
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/diffs/store/utils_spec.js b/spec/frontend/diffs/store/utils_spec.js
index 866be0abd22..181d562661f 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/diffs/store/utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/diffs/store/utils_spec.js
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import {
   OLD_LINE_TYPE,
   MATCH_LINE_TYPE,
   INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
-  PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
+  INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY,
 } from '~/diffs/constants';
 import { MERGE_REQUEST_NOTEABLE_TYPE } from '~/notes/constants';
 import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
@@ -20,14 +20,6 @@ import { noteableDataMock } from '../../notes/mock_data';
 const getDiffFileMock = () => JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(diffFileMockData));
 const getDiffMetadataMock = () => JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(diffMetadata));
 
-function extractLinesFromFile(file) {
-  const unpackedParallel = file.parallel_diff_lines
-    .flatMap(({ left, right }) => [left, right])
-    .filter(Boolean);
-
-  return [...file.highlighted_diff_lines, ...unpackedParallel];
-}
-
 describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
   describe('findDiffFile', () => {
     const files = [{ file_hash: 1, name: 'one' }];
@@ -45,7 +37,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('findIndexInInlineLines and findIndexInParallelLines', () => {
+  describe('findIndexInInlineLines', () => {
     const expectSet = (method, lines, invalidLines) => {
       expect(method(lines, { oldLineNumber: 3, newLineNumber: 5 })).toEqual(4);
       expect(method(invalidLines || lines, { oldLineNumber: 32, newLineNumber: 53 })).toEqual(-1);
@@ -53,44 +45,26 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
 
     describe('findIndexInInlineLines', () => {
       it('should return correct index for given line numbers', () => {
-        expectSet(utils.findIndexInInlineLines, getDiffFileMock().highlighted_diff_lines);
-      });
-    });
-
-    describe('findIndexInParallelLines', () => {
-      it('should return correct index for given line numbers', () => {
-        expectSet(utils.findIndexInParallelLines, getDiffFileMock().parallel_diff_lines, []);
+        expectSet(utils.findIndexInInlineLines, getDiffFileMock()[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]);
       });
     });
   });
 
   describe('getPreviousLineIndex', () => {
-    [
-      { diffViewType: INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, file: { parallel_diff_lines: [] } },
-      { diffViewType: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, file: { highlighted_diff_lines: [] } },
-    ].forEach(({ diffViewType, file }) => {
-      describe(`with diffViewType (${diffViewType}) in split diffs`, () => {
-        let diffFile;
-
-        beforeEach(() => {
-          diffFile = { ...clone(diffFileMockData), ...file };
-        });
+    describe(`with diffViewType (inline) in split diffs`, () => {
+      let diffFile;
 
-        it('should return the correct previous line number', () => {
-          const emptyLines =
-            diffViewType === INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE
-              ? diffFile.parallel_diff_lines
-              : diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines;
-
-          // This expectation asserts that we cannot possibly be using the opposite view type lines in the next expectation
-          expect(emptyLines.length).toBe(0);
-          expect(
-            utils.getPreviousLineIndex(diffViewType, diffFile, {
-              oldLineNumber: 3,
-              newLineNumber: 5,
-            }),
-          ).toBe(4);
-        });
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        diffFile = { ...clone(diffFileMockData) };
+      });
+
+      it('should return the correct previous line number', () => {
+        expect(
+          utils.getPreviousLineIndex(INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, diffFile, {
+            oldLineNumber: 3,
+            newLineNumber: 5,
+          }),
+        ).toBe(4);
       });
     });
   });
@@ -100,82 +74,50 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
       const diffFile = getDiffFileMock();
       const lineNumbers = { oldLineNumber: 3, newLineNumber: 5 };
       const inlineIndex = utils.findIndexInInlineLines(
-        diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines,
-        lineNumbers,
-      );
-      const parallelIndex = utils.findIndexInParallelLines(
-        diffFile.parallel_diff_lines,
+        diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY],
         lineNumbers,
       );
-      const atInlineIndex = diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines[inlineIndex];
-      const atParallelIndex = diffFile.parallel_diff_lines[parallelIndex];
+      const atInlineIndex = diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][inlineIndex];
 
       utils.removeMatchLine(diffFile, lineNumbers, false);
 
-      expect(diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines[inlineIndex]).not.toEqual(atInlineIndex);
-      expect(diffFile.parallel_diff_lines[parallelIndex]).not.toEqual(atParallelIndex);
+      expect(diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][inlineIndex]).not.toEqual(atInlineIndex);
 
       utils.removeMatchLine(diffFile, lineNumbers, true);
 
-      expect(diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines[inlineIndex + 1]).not.toEqual(atInlineIndex);
-      expect(diffFile.parallel_diff_lines[parallelIndex + 1]).not.toEqual(atParallelIndex);
+      expect(diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][inlineIndex + 1]).not.toEqual(atInlineIndex);
     });
   });
 
   describe('addContextLines', () => {
-    [INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE].forEach(diffViewType => {
-      it(`should add context lines for ${diffViewType}`, () => {
-        const diffFile = getDiffFileMock();
-        const inlineLines = diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines;
-        const parallelLines = diffFile.parallel_diff_lines;
-        const lineNumbers = { oldLineNumber: 3, newLineNumber: 5 };
-        const contextLines = [{ lineNumber: 42, line_code: '123' }];
-        const options = { inlineLines, parallelLines, contextLines, lineNumbers, diffViewType };
-        const inlineIndex = utils.findIndexInInlineLines(inlineLines, lineNumbers);
-        const parallelIndex = utils.findIndexInParallelLines(parallelLines, lineNumbers);
-        const normalizedParallelLine = {
-          left: options.contextLines[0],
-          right: options.contextLines[0],
-          line_code: '123',
-        };
+    it(`should add context lines`, () => {
+      const diffFile = getDiffFileMock();
+      const inlineLines = diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY];
+      const lineNumbers = { oldLineNumber: 3, newLineNumber: 5 };
+      const contextLines = [{ lineNumber: 42, line_code: '123' }];
+      const options = { inlineLines, contextLines, lineNumbers };
+      const inlineIndex = utils.findIndexInInlineLines(inlineLines, lineNumbers);
 
-        utils.addContextLines(options);
+      utils.addContextLines(options);
 
-        if (diffViewType === INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE) {
-          expect(inlineLines[inlineIndex]).toEqual(contextLines[0]);
-        } else {
-          expect(parallelLines[parallelIndex]).toEqual(normalizedParallelLine);
-        }
-      });
+      expect(inlineLines[inlineIndex]).toEqual(contextLines[0]);
+    });
 
-      it(`should add context lines properly with bottom parameter for ${diffViewType}`, () => {
-        const diffFile = getDiffFileMock();
-        const inlineLines = diffFile.highlighted_diff_lines;
-        const parallelLines = diffFile.parallel_diff_lines;
-        const lineNumbers = { oldLineNumber: 3, newLineNumber: 5 };
-        const contextLines = [{ lineNumber: 42, line_code: '123' }];
-        const options = {
-          inlineLines,
-          parallelLines,
-          contextLines,
-          lineNumbers,
-          bottom: true,
-          diffViewType,
-        };
-        const normalizedParallelLine = {
-          left: options.contextLines[0],
-          right: options.contextLines[0],
-          line_code: '123',
-        };
+    it(`should add context lines properly with bottom parameter`, () => {
+      const diffFile = getDiffFileMock();
+      const inlineLines = diffFile[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY];
+      const lineNumbers = { oldLineNumber: 3, newLineNumber: 5 };
+      const contextLines = [{ lineNumber: 42, line_code: '123' }];
+      const options = {
+        inlineLines,
+        contextLines,
+        lineNumbers,
+        bottom: true,
+      };
 
-        utils.addContextLines(options);
+      utils.addContextLines(options);
 
-        if (diffViewType === INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE) {
-          expect(inlineLines[inlineLines.length - 1]).toEqual(contextLines[0]);
-        } else {
-          expect(parallelLines[parallelLines.length - 1]).toEqual(normalizedParallelLine);
-        }
-      });
+      expect(inlineLines[inlineLines.length - 1]).toEqual(contextLines[0]);
     });
   });
 
@@ -195,7 +137,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
           new_line: 3,
           old_line: 1,
         },
-        diffViewType: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
         linePosition: LINE_POSITION_LEFT,
         lineRange: { start_line_code: 'abc_1_1', end_line_code: 'abc_2_2' },
       };
@@ -256,7 +197,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
           new_line: 3,
           old_line: 1,
         },
-        diffViewType: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
         linePosition: LINE_POSITION_LEFT,
       };
 
@@ -424,20 +364,6 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
       expect(preppedLine).toEqual(correctLine);
     });
 
-    it('returns a nested object with "left" and "right" lines + the line code for `parallel` lines', () => {
-      preppedLine = utils.prepareLineForRenamedFile({
-        diffViewType: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
-        line: sourceLine,
-        index: lineIndex,
-        diffFile,
-      });
-
-      expect(Object.keys(preppedLine)).toEqual(['left', 'right', 'line_code']);
-      expect(preppedLine.left).toEqual(correctLine);
-      expect(preppedLine.right).toEqual(correctLine);
-      expect(preppedLine.line_code).toEqual(correctLine.line_code);
-    });
-
     it.each`
       brokenSymlink
       ${false}
@@ -474,13 +400,13 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
 
         preparedDiff = { diff_files: [mock] };
         splitInlineDiff = {
-          diff_files: [{ ...mock, parallel_diff_lines: undefined }],
+          diff_files: [{ ...mock }],
         };
         splitParallelDiff = {
-          diff_files: [{ ...mock, highlighted_diff_lines: undefined }],
+          diff_files: [{ ...mock, [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: undefined }],
         };
         completedDiff = {
-          diff_files: [{ ...mock, highlighted_diff_lines: undefined }],
+          diff_files: [{ ...mock, [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: undefined }],
         };
 
         preparedDiff.diff_files = utils.prepareDiffData(preparedDiff);
@@ -490,19 +416,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
       });
 
       it('sets the renderIt and collapsed attribute on files', () => {
-        const firstParallelDiffLine = preparedDiff.diff_files[0].parallel_diff_lines[2];
-
-        expect(firstParallelDiffLine.left.discussions.length).toBe(0);
-        expect(firstParallelDiffLine.left).not.toHaveAttr('text');
-        expect(firstParallelDiffLine.right.discussions.length).toBe(0);
-        expect(firstParallelDiffLine.right).not.toHaveAttr('text');
-        const firstParallelChar = firstParallelDiffLine.right.rich_text.charAt(0);
-
-        expect(firstParallelChar).not.toBe(' ');
-        expect(firstParallelChar).not.toBe('+');
-        expect(firstParallelChar).not.toBe('-');
-
-        const checkLine = preparedDiff.diff_files[0].highlighted_diff_lines[0];
+        const checkLine = preparedDiff.diff_files[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY][0];
 
         expect(checkLine.discussions.length).toBe(0);
         expect(checkLine).not.toHaveAttr('text');
@@ -516,29 +430,14 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
         expect(preparedDiff.diff_files[0].collapsed).toBeFalsy();
       });
 
-      it('adds line_code to all lines', () => {
-        expect(
-          preparedDiff.diff_files[0].parallel_diff_lines.filter(line => !line.line_code),
-        ).toHaveLength(0);
-      });
-
-      it('uses right line code if left has none', () => {
-        const firstLine = preparedDiff.diff_files[0].parallel_diff_lines[0];
-
-        expect(firstLine.line_code).toEqual(firstLine.right.line_code);
-      });
-
       it('guarantees an empty array for both diff styles', () => {
-        expect(splitInlineDiff.diff_files[0].parallel_diff_lines.length).toEqual(0);
-        expect(splitInlineDiff.diff_files[0].highlighted_diff_lines.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-        expect(splitParallelDiff.diff_files[0].parallel_diff_lines.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-        expect(splitParallelDiff.diff_files[0].highlighted_diff_lines.length).toEqual(0);
+        expect(splitInlineDiff.diff_files[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY].length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        expect(splitParallelDiff.diff_files[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY].length).toEqual(0);
       });
 
       it('merges existing diff files with newly loaded diff files to ensure split diffs are eventually completed', () => {
         expect(completedDiff.diff_files.length).toEqual(1);
-        expect(completedDiff.diff_files[0].parallel_diff_lines.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-        expect(completedDiff.diff_files[0].highlighted_diff_lines.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        expect(completedDiff.diff_files[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY].length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
       });
 
       it('leaves files in the existing state', () => {
@@ -555,11 +454,11 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
 
       it('completes an existing split diff without overwriting existing diffs', () => {
         // The current state has a file that has only loaded inline lines
-        const priorFiles = [{ ...mock, parallel_diff_lines: [] }];
+        const priorFiles = [{ ...mock }];
         // The next (batch) load loads two files: the other half of that file, and a new file
         const fakeBatch = [
-          { ...mock, highlighted_diff_lines: undefined },
-          { ...mock, highlighted_diff_lines: undefined, content_sha: 'ABC', file_hash: 'DEF' },
+          { ...mock, [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: undefined },
+          { ...mock, [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: undefined, content_sha: 'ABC', file_hash: 'DEF' },
         ];
         const updatedFilesList = utils.prepareDiffData({ diff_files: fakeBatch }, priorFiles);
 
@@ -584,7 +483,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
           ...splitInlineDiff.diff_files,
           ...splitParallelDiff.diff_files,
           ...completedDiff.diff_files,
-        ].flatMap(file => extractLinesFromFile(file));
+        ].flatMap(file => [...file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]]);
 
         lines.forEach(line => {
           expect(line.commentsDisabled).toBe(false);
@@ -608,8 +507,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
       });
 
       it('guarantees an empty array of lines for both diff styles', () => {
-        expect(preparedDiffFiles[0].parallel_diff_lines.length).toEqual(0);
-        expect(preparedDiffFiles[0].highlighted_diff_lines.length).toEqual(0);
+        expect(preparedDiffFiles[0][INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY].length).toEqual(0);
       });
 
       it('leaves files in the existing state', () => {
@@ -647,8 +545,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
           fileMock,
           {
             ...metaMock.diff_files[0],
-            highlighted_diff_lines: [],
-            parallel_diff_lines: [],
+            [INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY]: [],
           },
         ]);
       });
@@ -1217,7 +1114,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
     it('converts inline diff lines to parallel diff lines', () => {
       const file = getDiffFileMock();
 
-      expect(utils.parallelizeDiffLines(file.highlighted_diff_lines)).toEqual(
+      expect(utils.parallelizeDiffLines(file[INLINE_DIFF_LINES_KEY])).toEqual(
         file.parallel_diff_lines,
       );
     });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/environments/environment_actions_spec.js b/spec/frontend/environments/environment_actions_spec.js
index d305f5e90bd..cc5153d6eba 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/environments/environment_actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/environments/environment_actions_spec.js
@@ -1,51 +1,69 @@
-import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { shallowMount, mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { TEST_HOST } from 'helpers/test_constants';
-import { GlLoadingIcon, GlIcon } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { GlDropdown, GlDropdownItem, GlLoadingIcon, GlIcon } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
 import eventHub from '~/environments/event_hub';
 import EnvironmentActions from '~/environments/components/environment_actions.vue';
 
+const scheduledJobAction = {
+  name: 'scheduled action',
+  playPath: `${TEST_HOST}/scheduled/job/action`,
+  playable: true,
+  scheduledAt: '2063-04-05T00:42:00Z',
+};
+
+const expiredJobAction = {
+  name: 'expired action',
+  playPath: `${TEST_HOST}/expired/job/action`,
+  playable: true,
+  scheduledAt: '2018-10-05T08:23:00Z',
+};
+
 describe('EnvironmentActions Component', () => {
-  let vm;
+  let wrapper;
 
-  const findEnvironmentActionsButton = () => vm.find('[data-testid="environment-actions-button"]');
+  const findEnvironmentActionsButton = () =>
+    wrapper.find('[data-testid="environment-actions-button"]');
 
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    vm = shallowMount(EnvironmentActions, {
-      propsData: { actions: [] },
+  function createComponent(props, { mountFn = shallowMount } = {}) {
+    wrapper = mountFn(EnvironmentActions, {
+      propsData: { actions: [], ...props },
       directives: {
         GlTooltip: createMockDirective(),
       },
     });
-  });
+  }
+
+  function createComponentWithScheduledJobs(opts = {}) {
+    return createComponent({ actions: [scheduledJobAction, expiredJobAction] }, opts);
+  }
+
+  const findDropdownItem = action => {
+    const buttons = wrapper.findAll(GlDropdownItem);
+    return buttons.filter(button => button.text().startsWith(action.name)).at(0);
+  };
 
   afterEach(() => {
-    vm.destroy();
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
   });
 
   it('should render a dropdown button with 2 icons', () => {
-    expect(vm.find('.dropdown-new').findAll(GlIcon).length).toBe(2);
+    createComponent({}, { mountFn: mount });
+    expect(wrapper.find(GlDropdown).findAll(GlIcon).length).toBe(2);
   });
 
   it('should render a dropdown button with aria-label description', () => {
-    expect(vm.find('.dropdown-new').attributes('aria-label')).toEqual('Deploy to...');
+    createComponent();
+    expect(wrapper.find(GlDropdown).attributes('aria-label')).toBe('Deploy to...');
   });
 
   it('should render a tooltip', () => {
+    createComponent();
     const tooltip = getBinding(findEnvironmentActionsButton().element, 'gl-tooltip');
     expect(tooltip).toBeDefined();
   });
 
-  describe('is loading', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      vm.setData({ isLoading: true });
-    });
-
-    it('should render a dropdown button with a loading icon', () => {
-      expect(vm.findAll(GlLoadingIcon).length).toBe(1);
-    });
-  });
-
   describe('manual actions', () => {
     const actions = [
       {
@@ -64,68 +82,71 @@ describe('EnvironmentActions Component', () => {
     ];
 
     beforeEach(() => {
-      vm.setProps({ actions });
+      createComponent({ actions });
     });
 
     it('should render a dropdown with the provided list of actions', () => {
-      expect(vm.findAll('.dropdown-menu li').length).toEqual(actions.length);
+      expect(wrapper.findAll(GlDropdownItem)).toHaveLength(actions.length);
     });
 
     it("should render a disabled action when it's not playable", () => {
-      expect(vm.find('.dropdown-menu li:last-child gl-button-stub').props('disabled')).toBe(true);
+      const dropdownItems = wrapper.findAll(GlDropdownItem);
+      const lastDropdownItem = dropdownItems.at(dropdownItems.length - 1);
+      expect(lastDropdownItem.attributes('disabled')).toBe('true');
     });
   });
 
   describe('scheduled jobs', () => {
-    const scheduledJobAction = {
-      name: 'scheduled action',
-      playPath: `${TEST_HOST}/scheduled/job/action`,
-      playable: true,
-      scheduledAt: '2063-04-05T00:42:00Z',
-    };
-    const expiredJobAction = {
-      name: 'expired action',
-      playPath: `${TEST_HOST}/expired/job/action`,
-      playable: true,
-      scheduledAt: '2018-10-05T08:23:00Z',
-    };
-    const findDropdownItem = action => {
-      const buttons = vm.findAll('.dropdown-menu li gl-button-stub');
-      return buttons.filter(button => button.text().startsWith(action.name)).at(0);
+    let emitSpy;
+
+    const clickAndConfirm = async ({ confirm = true } = {}) => {
+      jest.spyOn(window, 'confirm').mockImplementation(() => confirm);
+
+      findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction).vm.$emit('click');
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
     };
 
     beforeEach(() => {
+      emitSpy = jest.fn();
+      eventHub.$on('postAction', emitSpy);
       jest.spyOn(Date, 'now').mockImplementation(() => new Date('2063-04-04T00:42:00Z').getTime());
-      vm.setProps({ actions: [scheduledJobAction, expiredJobAction] });
     });
 
-    it('emits postAction event after confirming', () => {
-      const emitSpy = jest.fn();
-      eventHub.$on('postAction', emitSpy);
-      jest.spyOn(window, 'confirm').mockImplementation(() => true);
+    describe('when postAction event is confirmed', () => {
+      beforeEach(async () => {
+        createComponentWithScheduledJobs({ mountFn: mount });
+        clickAndConfirm();
+      });
 
-      findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction).vm.$emit('click');
+      it('emits postAction event', () => {
+        expect(window.confirm).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ endpoint: scheduledJobAction.playPath });
+      });
 
-      expect(window.confirm).toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ endpoint: scheduledJobAction.playPath });
+      it('should render a dropdown button with a loading icon', () => {
+        expect(wrapper.find(GlLoadingIcon).isVisible()).toBe(true);
+      });
     });
 
-    it('does not emit postAction event if confirmation is cancelled', () => {
-      const emitSpy = jest.fn();
-      eventHub.$on('postAction', emitSpy);
-      jest.spyOn(window, 'confirm').mockImplementation(() => false);
-
-      findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction).vm.$emit('click');
+    describe('when postAction event is denied', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        createComponentWithScheduledJobs({ mountFn: mount });
+        clickAndConfirm({ confirm: false });
+      });
 
-      expect(window.confirm).toHaveBeenCalled();
-      expect(emitSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      it('does not emit postAction event if confirmation is cancelled', () => {
+        expect(window.confirm).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(emitSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      });
     });
 
     it('displays the remaining time in the dropdown', () => {
+      createComponentWithScheduledJobs();
       expect(findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction).text()).toContain('24:00:00');
     });
 
     it('displays 00:00:00 for expired jobs in the dropdown', () => {
+      createComponentWithScheduledJobs();
       expect(findDropdownItem(expiredJobAction).text()).toContain('00:00:00');
     });
   });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/fixtures/raw.rb b/spec/frontend/fixtures/raw.rb
index 337067121d0..7e42fa61e8e 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/fixtures/raw.rb
+++ b/spec/frontend/fixtures/raw.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ RSpec.describe 'Raw files', '(JavaScript fixtures)' do
     clean_frontend_fixtures('blob/balsamiq/')
     clean_frontend_fixtures('blob/notebook/')
     clean_frontend_fixtures('blob/pdf/')
+    clean_frontend_fixtures('blob/text/')
+    clean_frontend_fixtures('blob/binary/')
+    clean_frontend_fixtures('blob/images/')
   end
 
   after do
@@ -38,4 +41,16 @@ RSpec.describe 'Raw files', '(JavaScript fixtures)' do
   it 'blob/pdf/test.pdf' do
     @blob = project.repository.blob_at('e774ebd33', 'files/pdf/test.pdf')
   end
+
+  it 'blob/text/README.md' do
+    @blob = project.repository.blob_at('e774ebd33', 'README.md')
+  end
+
+  it 'blob/images/logo-white.png' do
+    @blob = project.repository.blob_at('e774ebd33', 'files/images/logo-white.png')
+  end
+
+  it 'blob/binary/Gemfile.zip' do
+    @blob = project.repository.blob_at('e774ebd33', 'Gemfile.zip')
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/frontend/groups/components/app_spec.js b/spec/frontend/groups/components/app_spec.js
index 691f8896d74..72d8e23f28b 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/groups/components/app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/groups/components/app_spec.js
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
   let mock;
   let getGroupsSpy;
 
-  const store = new GroupsStore(false);
+  const store = new GroupsStore({ hideProjects: false });
   const service = new GroupsService(mockEndpoint);
 
   const createShallowComponent = (hideProjects = false) => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/groups/components/group_item_spec.js b/spec/frontend/groups/components/group_item_spec.js
index 83acbb152b5..32bae812c86 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/groups/components/group_item_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/groups/components/group_item_spec.js
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import Vue from 'vue';
 import mountComponent from 'helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
 import groupItemComponent from '~/groups/components/group_item.vue';
 import groupFolderComponent from '~/groups/components/group_folder.vue';
+import { getGroupItemMicrodata } from '~/groups/store/utils';
 import eventHub from '~/groups/event_hub';
 import * as urlUtilities from '~/lib/utils/url_utility';
 import { mockParentGroupItem, mockChildren } from '../mock_data';
@@ -30,6 +31,11 @@ describe('GroupItemComponent', () => {
     vm.$destroy();
   });
 
+  const withMicrodata = group => ({
+    ...group,
+    microdata: getGroupItemMicrodata(group),
+  });
+
   describe('computed', () => {
     describe('groupDomId', () => {
       it('should return ID string suffixed with group ID', () => {
@@ -212,4 +218,47 @@ describe('GroupItemComponent', () => {
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.group-list-tree')).toBeDefined();
     });
   });
+  describe('schema.org props', () => {
+    describe('when showSchemaMarkup is disabled on the group', () => {
+      it.each(['itemprop', 'itemtype', 'itemscope'], 'it does not set %s', attr => {
+        expect(vm.$el.getAttribute(attr)).toBeNull();
+      });
+      it.each(
+        ['.js-group-avatar', '.js-group-name', '.js-group-description'],
+        'it does not set `itemprop` on sub-nodes',
+        selector => {
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector(selector).getAttribute('itemprop')).toBeNull();
+        },
+      );
+    });
+    describe('when group has microdata', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        const group = withMicrodata({
+          ...mockParentGroupItem,
+          avatarUrl: 'http://foo.bar',
+          description: 'Foo Bar',
+        });
+
+        vm = createComponent(group);
+      });
+
+      it.each`
+        attr           | value
+        ${'itemscope'} | ${'itemscope'}
+        ${'itemtype'}  | ${'https://schema.org/Organization'}
+        ${'itemprop'}  | ${'subOrganization'}
+      `('it does set correct $attr', ({ attr, value } = {}) => {
+        expect(vm.$el.getAttribute(attr)).toBe(value);
+      });
+
+      it.each`
+        selector                               | propValue
+        ${'[data-testid="group-avatar"]'}      | ${'logo'}
+        ${'[data-testid="group-name"]'}        | ${'name'}
+        ${'[data-testid="group-description"]'} | ${'description'}
+      `('it does set correct $selector', ({ selector, propValue } = {}) => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector(selector).getAttribute('itemprop')).toBe(propValue);
+      });
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/groups/members/components/app_spec.js b/spec/frontend/groups/members/components/app_spec.js
index de9f30649e9..0db3fc18c34 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/groups/members/components/app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/groups/members/components/app_spec.js
@@ -4,11 +4,8 @@ import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { GlAlert } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import App from '~/groups/members/components/app.vue';
 import * as commonUtils from '~/lib/utils/common_utils';
-import {
-  RECEIVE_MEMBER_ROLE_ERROR,
-  HIDE_ERROR,
-} from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutation_types';
-import mutations from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutations';
+import { RECEIVE_MEMBER_ROLE_ERROR, HIDE_ERROR } from '~/members/store/mutation_types';
+import mutations from '~/members/store/mutations';
 
 describe('GroupMembersApp', () => {
   const localVue = createLocalVue();
diff --git a/spec/frontend/groups/store/groups_store_spec.js b/spec/frontend/groups/store/groups_store_spec.js
index 7d12f73d270..8ac5d7099f1 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/groups/store/groups_store_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/groups/store/groups_store_spec.js
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 import GroupsStore from '~/groups/store/groups_store';
+import { getGroupItemMicrodata } from '~/groups/store/utils';
 import {
   mockGroups,
   mockSearchedGroups,
@@ -17,9 +18,9 @@ describe('ProjectsStore', () => {
       expect(Object.keys(store.state).length).toBe(2);
       expect(Array.isArray(store.state.groups)).toBeTruthy();
       expect(Object.keys(store.state.pageInfo).length).toBe(0);
-      expect(store.hideProjects).not.toBeDefined();
+      expect(store.hideProjects).toBeFalsy();
 
-      store = new GroupsStore(true);
+      store = new GroupsStore({ hideProjects: true });
 
       expect(store.hideProjects).toBeTruthy();
     });
@@ -86,22 +87,30 @@ describe('ProjectsStore', () => {
 
   describe('formatGroupItem', () => {
     it('should parse group item object and return updated object', () => {
-      let store;
-      let updatedGroupItem;
-
-      store = new GroupsStore();
-      updatedGroupItem = store.formatGroupItem(mockRawChildren[0]);
+      const store = new GroupsStore();
+      const updatedGroupItem = store.formatGroupItem(mockRawChildren[0]);
 
       expect(Object.keys(updatedGroupItem).indexOf('fullName')).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
       expect(updatedGroupItem.childrenCount).toBe(mockRawChildren[0].children_count);
       expect(updatedGroupItem.isChildrenLoading).toBe(false);
       expect(updatedGroupItem.isBeingRemoved).toBe(false);
+      expect(updatedGroupItem.microdata).toEqual({});
+    });
 
-      store = new GroupsStore(true);
-      updatedGroupItem = store.formatGroupItem(mockRawChildren[0]);
+    it('with hideProjects', () => {
+      const store = new GroupsStore({ hideProjects: true });
+      const updatedGroupItem = store.formatGroupItem(mockRawChildren[0]);
 
       expect(Object.keys(updatedGroupItem).indexOf('fullName')).toBeGreaterThan(-1);
       expect(updatedGroupItem.childrenCount).toBe(mockRawChildren[0].subgroup_count);
+      expect(updatedGroupItem.microdata).toEqual({});
+    });
+
+    it('with showSchemaMarkup', () => {
+      const store = new GroupsStore({ showSchemaMarkup: true });
+      const updatedGroupItem = store.formatGroupItem(mockRawChildren[0]);
+
+      expect(updatedGroupItem.microdata).toEqual(getGroupItemMicrodata(mockRawChildren[0]));
     });
   });
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/groups/store/utils_spec.js b/spec/frontend/groups/store/utils_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0961d4c72b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/groups/store/utils_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+import { getGroupItemMicrodata } from '~/groups/store/utils';
+
+describe('~/groups/store/utils', () => {
+  describe('getGroupItemMetadata', () => {
+    it('has default type', () => {
+      expect(getGroupItemMicrodata({ type: 'silly' })).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
+        Object {
+          "descriptionItemprop": "description",
+          "imageItemprop": "image",
+          "itemprop": "owns",
+          "itemscope": true,
+          "itemtype": "https://schema.org/Thing",
+          "nameItemprop": "name",
+        }
+      `);
+    });
+
+    it('has group props', () => {
+      expect(getGroupItemMicrodata({ type: 'group' })).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
+        Object {
+          "descriptionItemprop": "description",
+          "imageItemprop": "logo",
+          "itemprop": "subOrganization",
+          "itemscope": true,
+          "itemtype": "https://schema.org/Organization",
+          "nameItemprop": "name",
+        }
+      `);
+    });
+
+    it('has project props', () => {
+      expect(getGroupItemMicrodata({ type: 'project' })).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
+        Object {
+          "descriptionItemprop": "description",
+          "imageItemprop": "image",
+          "itemprop": "owns",
+          "itemscope": true,
+          "itemtype": "https://schema.org/SoftwareSourceCode",
+          "nameItemprop": "name",
+        }
+      `);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/ide/components/terminal/session_spec.js b/spec/frontend/ide/components/terminal/session_spec.js
index ce61a31691a..3ca37166ac4 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/ide/components/terminal/session_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/ide/components/terminal/session_spec.js
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 import { createLocalVue, shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlButton } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import TerminalSession from '~/ide/components/terminal/session.vue';
 import Terminal from '~/ide/components/terminal/terminal.vue';
@@ -38,6 +39,8 @@ describe('IDE TerminalSession', () => {
     });
   };
 
+  const findButton = () => wrapper.find(GlButton);
+
   beforeEach(() => {
     state = {
       session: { status: RUNNING, terminalPath: TEST_TERMINAL_PATH },
@@ -69,8 +72,8 @@ describe('IDE TerminalSession', () => {
       state.session = { status };
       factory();
 
-      const button = wrapper.find('button');
-      button.trigger('click');
+      const button = findButton();
+      button.vm.$emit('click');
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
         expect(button.text()).toEqual('Stop Terminal');
@@ -84,8 +87,8 @@ describe('IDE TerminalSession', () => {
       state.session = { status };
       factory();
 
-      const button = wrapper.find('button');
-      button.trigger('click');
+      const button = findButton();
+      button.vm.$emit('click');
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
         expect(button.text()).toEqual('Restart Terminal');
diff --git a/spec/frontend/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js b/spec/frontend/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js
index cc290fc526e..744ac086b5f 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js
@@ -510,8 +510,6 @@ describe('IDE store file actions', () => {
 
   describe('changeFileContent', () => {
     let tmpFile;
-    const callAction = (content = 'content\n') =>
-      store.dispatch('changeFileContent', { path: tmpFile.path, content });
 
     beforeEach(() => {
       tmpFile = file('tmpFile');
@@ -521,11 +519,23 @@ describe('IDE store file actions', () => {
     });
 
     it('updates file content', () => {
-      return callAction().then(() => {
+      const content = 'content\n';
+
+      return store.dispatch('changeFileContent', { path: tmpFile.path, content }).then(() => {
         expect(tmpFile.content).toBe('content\n');
       });
     });
 
+    it('does nothing if path does not exist', () => {
+      const content = 'content\n';
+
+      return store
+        .dispatch('changeFileContent', { path: 'not/a/real_file.txt', content })
+        .then(() => {
+          expect(tmpFile.content).toBe('\n');
+        });
+    });
+
     it('adds file into stagedFiles array', () => {
       return store
         .dispatch('changeFileContent', {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/incidents_settings/components/__snapshots__/incidents_settings_tabs_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/incidents_settings/components/__snapshots__/incidents_settings_tabs_spec.js.snap
index 072e611b9a4..2b3c803be08 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/incidents_settings/components/__snapshots__/incidents_settings_tabs_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/incidents_settings/components/__snapshots__/incidents_settings_tabs_spec.js.snap
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ exports[`IncidentsSettingTabs should render the component 1`] = `
     >
       <gl-tab-stub
         title="Alert integration"
+        titlelinkclass=""
       >
         <alertssettingsform-stub
           class="gl-pt-3"
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ exports[`IncidentsSettingTabs should render the component 1`] = `
       </gl-tab-stub>
       <gl-tab-stub
         title="PagerDuty integration"
+        titlelinkclass=""
       >
         <pagerdutysettingsform-stub
           class="gl-pt-3"
diff --git a/spec/frontend/issuable/related_issues/components/issue_token_spec.js b/spec/frontend/issuable/related_issues/components/issue_token_spec.js
index 1b4c6b548e2..d5181d4a17a 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/issuable/related_issues/components/issue_token_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/issuable/related_issues/components/issue_token_spec.js
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ describe('IssueToken', () => {
         state,
       });
 
-      expect(findReferenceIcon().attributes('aria-label')).toBe(state);
+      expect(findReferenceIcon().props('ariaLabel')).toBe(state);
       expect(findReference().text()).toBe(displayReference);
       expect(findTitle().text()).toBe(title);
     });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/jira_import/components/__snapshots__/jira_import_form_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/jira_import/components/__snapshots__/jira_import_form_spec.js.snap
index fe6d9a34078..c40b7c90c72 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/jira_import/components/__snapshots__/jira_import_form_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/jira_import/components/__snapshots__/jira_import_form_spec.js.snap
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ exports[`JiraImportForm table body shows correct information in each cell 1`] =
               class="gl-search-box-by-type"
             >
               <svg
+                aria-hidden="true"
                 class="gl-search-box-by-type-search-icon gl-icon s16"
                 data-testid="search-icon"
               >
@@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ exports[`JiraImportForm table body shows correct information in each cell 1`] =
               class="gl-search-box-by-type"
             >
               <svg
+                aria-hidden="true"
                 class="gl-search-box-by-type-search-icon gl-icon s16"
                 data-testid="search-icon"
               >
diff --git a/spec/frontend/jobs/components/log/line_spec.js b/spec/frontend/jobs/components/log/line_spec.js
index 314b23ec29b..354bc62de29 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/jobs/components/log/line_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/jobs/components/log/line_spec.js
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import LineNumber from '~/jobs/components/log/line_number.vue';
 
 const httpUrl = 'http://example.com';
 const httpsUrl = 'https://example.com';
+const queryUrl = 'https://example.com?param=val';
 
 const mockProps = ({ text = 'Running with gitlab-runner 12.1.0 (de7731dd)' } = {}) => ({
   line: {
@@ -33,10 +34,11 @@ describe('Job Log Line', () => {
 
   const findLine = () => wrapper.find('span');
   const findLink = () => findLine().find('a');
-  const findLinksAt = i =>
-    findLine()
-      .findAll('a')
-      .at(i);
+  const findLinks = () => findLine().findAll('a');
+  const findLinkAttributeByIndex = i =>
+    findLinks()
+      .at(i)
+      .attributes();
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     originalGon = window.gon;
@@ -116,15 +118,6 @@ describe('Job Log Line', () => {
       expect(findLink().attributes().href).toBe(httpsUrl);
     });
 
-    it('renders a multiple links surrounded by text', () => {
-      createComponent(mockProps({ text: `My HTTP url: ${httpUrl} and my HTTPS url: ${httpsUrl}` }));
-      expect(findLine().text()).toBe(
-        'My HTTP url: http://example.com and my HTTPS url: https://example.com',
-      );
-      expect(findLinksAt(0).attributes().href).toBe(httpUrl);
-      expect(findLinksAt(1).attributes().href).toBe(httpsUrl);
-    });
-
     it('renders a link with rel nofollow and noopener', () => {
       createComponent(mockProps({ text: httpsUrl }));
 
@@ -137,15 +130,49 @@ describe('Job Log Line', () => {
       expect(findLink().classes()).toEqual(['gl-reset-color!', 'gl-text-decoration-underline']);
     });
 
-    it('render links surrounded by text', () => {
+    it('renders a links with queries, surrounded by questions marks', () => {
+      createComponent(mockProps({ text: `Did you see my url ${queryUrl}??` }));
+
+      expect(findLine().text()).toBe('Did you see my url https://example.com?param=val??');
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(0).href).toBe(queryUrl);
+    });
+
+    it('renders a links with queries, surrounded by exclamation marks', () => {
+      createComponent(mockProps({ text: `No! The ${queryUrl}!?` }));
+
+      expect(findLine().text()).toBe('No! The https://example.com?param=val!?');
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(0).href).toBe(queryUrl);
+    });
+
+    it('renders a multiple links surrounded by text', () => {
       createComponent(
-        mockProps({ text: `My HTTP url: ${httpUrl} and my HTTPS url: ${httpsUrl} are here.` }),
+        mockProps({ text: `Well, my HTTP url: ${httpUrl} and my HTTPS url: ${httpsUrl}` }),
       );
       expect(findLine().text()).toBe(
-        'My HTTP url: http://example.com and my HTTPS url: https://example.com are here.',
+        'Well, my HTTP url: http://example.com and my HTTPS url: https://example.com',
       );
-      expect(findLinksAt(0).attributes().href).toBe(httpUrl);
-      expect(findLinksAt(1).attributes().href).toBe(httpsUrl);
+
+      expect(findLinks()).toHaveLength(2);
+
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(0).href).toBe(httpUrl);
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(1).href).toBe(httpsUrl);
+    });
+
+    it('renders a multiple links surrounded by text, with other symbols', () => {
+      createComponent(
+        mockProps({ text: `${httpUrl}, ${httpUrl}: ${httpsUrl}; ${httpsUrl}. ${httpsUrl}...` }),
+      );
+      expect(findLine().text()).toBe(
+        'http://example.com, http://example.com: https://example.com; https://example.com. https://example.com...',
+      );
+
+      expect(findLinks()).toHaveLength(5);
+
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(0).href).toBe(httpUrl);
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(1).href).toBe(httpUrl);
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(2).href).toBe(httpsUrl);
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(3).href).toBe(httpsUrl);
+      expect(findLinkAttributeByIndex(4).href).toBe(httpsUrl);
     });
 
     const jshref = 'javascript:doEvil();'; // eslint-disable-line no-script-url
diff --git a/spec/frontend/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js b/spec/frontend/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js
index 09eb362c77e..a0282e838cd 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ describe('common_utils', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       elem = document.createElement('div');
       window.innerHeight = windowHeight;
+      window.mrTabs = { currentAction: 'show' };
       jest.spyOn($.fn, 'animate');
       jest.spyOn($.fn, 'offset').mockReturnValue({ top: elemTop });
     });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons_spec.js
index 58cb8ef61d1..9a8434a1222 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import AccessRequestActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons.vue';
-import RemoveMemberButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
-import ApproveAccessRequestButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button.vue';
-import { accessRequest as member } from '../mock_data';
+import AccessRequestActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons.vue';
+import RemoveMemberButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
+import ApproveAccessRequestButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button.vue';
+import { accessRequest as member } from '../../mock_data';
 
 describe('AccessRequestActionButtons', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button_spec.js
index 93edaaa400d..7ce2c633bb3 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button_spec.js
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { shallowMount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { GlButton, GlForm } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import ApproveAccessRequestButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button.vue';
+import ApproveAccessRequestButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/approve_access_request_button.vue';
 
 jest.mock('~/lib/utils/csrf', () => ({ token: 'mock-csrf-token' }));
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons_spec.js
index 1374cdc6aef..887b21dc1d0 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import InviteActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons.vue';
-import RemoveMemberButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
-import ResendInviteButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/resend_invite_button.vue';
-import { invite as member } from '../mock_data';
+import InviteActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons.vue';
+import RemoveMemberButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
+import ResendInviteButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/resend_invite_button.vue';
+import { invite as member } from '../../mock_data';
 
 describe('InviteActionButtons', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/leave_button_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/leave_button_spec.js
index 00896b23b95..2afe112c74b 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/leave_button_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/leave_button_spec.js
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { GlButton } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import LeaveButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/leave_button.vue';
-import LeaveModal from '~/vue_shared/components/members/modals/leave_modal.vue';
-import { LEAVE_MODAL_ID } from '~/vue_shared/components/members/constants';
-import { member } from '../mock_data';
+import LeaveButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/leave_button.vue';
+import LeaveModal from '~/members/components/modals/leave_modal.vue';
+import { LEAVE_MODAL_ID } from '~/members/constants';
+import { member } from '../../mock_data';
 
 describe('LeaveButton', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_group_link_button_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/remove_group_link_button_spec.js
index 84fe1c51773..45283788676 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_group_link_button_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/remove_group_link_button_spec.js
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ import { mount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { GlButton } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import RemoveGroupLinkButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_group_link_button.vue';
-import { group } from '../mock_data';
+import RemoveGroupLinkButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/remove_group_link_button.vue';
+import { group } from '../../mock_data';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
 localVue.use(Vuex);
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_member_button_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/remove_member_button_spec.js
index 7aa30494234..437b3e705a4 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_member_button_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/remove_member_button_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import { shallowMount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import RemoveMemberButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
+import RemoveMemberButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
 localVue.use(Vuex);
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/resend_invite_button_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/resend_invite_button_spec.js
index 859fdd01043..a48942dd277 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/resend_invite_button_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/resend_invite_button_spec.js
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { shallowMount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { GlButton } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import ResendInviteButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/resend_invite_button.vue';
+import ResendInviteButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/resend_invite_button.vue';
 
 jest.mock('~/lib/utils/csrf', () => ({ token: 'mock-csrf-token' }));
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/user_action_buttons_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/user_action_buttons_spec.js
index f766ad5b0d1..b03e80a537d 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/user_action_buttons_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/action_buttons/user_action_buttons_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import UserActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/user_action_buttons.vue';
-import RemoveMemberButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
-import LeaveButton from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/leave_button.vue';
-import { member, orphanedMember } from '../mock_data';
+import UserActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/user_action_buttons.vue';
+import RemoveMemberButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/remove_member_button.vue';
+import LeaveButton from '~/members/components/action_buttons/leave_button.vue';
+import { member, orphanedMember } from '../../mock_data';
 
 describe('UserActionButtons', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/group_avatar_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/avatars/group_avatar_spec.js
index d6f5773295c..658bb9462b0 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/group_avatar_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/avatars/group_avatar_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import { mount, createWrapper } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { getByText as getByTextHelper } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { GlAvatarLink } from '@gitlab/ui';
-import { group as member } from '../mock_data';
-import GroupAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/group_avatar.vue';
+import { group as member } from '../../mock_data';
+import GroupAvatar from '~/members/components/avatars/group_avatar.vue';
 
 describe('MemberList', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/invite_avatar_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/avatars/invite_avatar_spec.js
index 7948da7eb40..13ee727528b 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/invite_avatar_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/avatars/invite_avatar_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import { mount, createWrapper } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { getByText as getByTextHelper } from '@testing-library/dom';
-import { invite as member } from '../mock_data';
-import InviteAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/invite_avatar.vue';
+import { invite as member } from '../../mock_data';
+import InviteAvatar from '~/members/components/avatars/invite_avatar.vue';
 
 describe('MemberList', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/user_avatar_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/avatars/user_avatar_spec.js
index 93d8e640968..7d6a9065975 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/user_avatar_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/avatars/user_avatar_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import { mount, createWrapper } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { within } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { GlAvatarLink, GlBadge } from '@gitlab/ui';
-import { member as memberMock, orphanedMember } from '../mock_data';
-import UserAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/user_avatar.vue';
+import { member as memberMock, orphanedMember } from '../../mock_data';
+import UserAvatar from '~/members/components/avatars/user_avatar.vue';
 
 describe('UserAvatar', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/modals/leave_modal_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/modals/leave_modal_spec.js
index 63de355a3c8..d7acf12212c 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/modals/leave_modal_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/modals/leave_modal_spec.js
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ import { GlModal, GlForm } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { nextTick } from 'vue';
 import { within } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
-import LeaveModal from '~/vue_shared/components/members/modals/leave_modal.vue';
-import { LEAVE_MODAL_ID } from '~/vue_shared/components/members/constants';
-import { member } from '../mock_data';
+import LeaveModal from '~/members/components/modals/leave_modal.vue';
+import { LEAVE_MODAL_ID } from '~/members/constants';
+import { member } from '../../mock_data';
 
 jest.mock('~/lib/utils/csrf', () => ({ token: 'mock-csrf-token' }));
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/modals/remove_group_link_modal_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/modals/remove_group_link_modal_spec.js
index 84da051792d..593dbcd28ba 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/modals/remove_group_link_modal_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/modals/remove_group_link_modal_spec.js
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ import { GlModal, GlForm } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { nextTick } from 'vue';
 import { within } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
-import RemoveGroupLinkModal from '~/vue_shared/components/members/modals/remove_group_link_modal.vue';
-import { REMOVE_GROUP_LINK_MODAL_ID } from '~/vue_shared/components/members/constants';
-import { group } from '../mock_data';
+import RemoveGroupLinkModal from '~/members/components/modals/remove_group_link_modal.vue';
+import { REMOVE_GROUP_LINK_MODAL_ID } from '~/members/constants';
+import { group } from '../../mock_data';
 
 jest.mock('~/lib/utils/csrf', () => ({ token: 'mock-csrf-token' }));
 
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/created_at_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/created_at_spec.js
index cf3821baf44..a9f809cd805 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/created_at_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/created_at_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import { mount, createWrapper } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { within } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { useFakeDate } from 'helpers/fake_date';
-import CreatedAt from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/created_at.vue';
+import CreatedAt from '~/members/components/table/created_at.vue';
 import TimeAgoTooltip from '~/vue_shared/components/time_ago_tooltip.vue';
 
 describe('CreatedAt', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/expiration_datepicker_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/expiration_datepicker_spec.js
index a1afdbc2b49..ba1b2256e76 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/expiration_datepicker_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/expiration_datepicker_spec.js
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ import { nextTick } from 'vue';
 import { GlDatepicker } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { useFakeDate } from 'helpers/fake_date';
 import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
-import ExpirationDatepicker from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/expiration_datepicker.vue';
-import { member } from '../mock_data';
+import ExpirationDatepicker from '~/members/components/table/expiration_datepicker.vue';
+import { member } from '../../mock_data';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
 localVue.use(Vuex);
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/expires_at_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/expires_at_spec.js
index 95ae251b0fd..cf0fc78656e 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/expires_at_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/expires_at_spec.js
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { mount, createWrapper } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { within } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { useFakeDate } from 'helpers/fake_date';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import ExpiresAt from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/expires_at.vue';
+import ExpiresAt from '~/members/components/table/expires_at.vue';
 
 describe('ExpiresAt', () => {
   // March 15th, 2020
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_action_buttons_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/member_action_buttons_spec.js
index e55d9b6be2a..b7a6df3d054 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_action_buttons_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/member_action_buttons_spec.js
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import { MEMBER_TYPES } from '~/vue_shared/components/members/constants';
-import { member as memberMock, group, invite, accessRequest } from '../mock_data';
-import MemberActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_action_buttons.vue';
-import UserActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/user_action_buttons.vue';
-import GroupActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/group_action_buttons.vue';
-import InviteActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons.vue';
-import AccessRequestActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons.vue';
+import { MEMBER_TYPES } from '~/members/constants';
+import { member as memberMock, group, invite, accessRequest } from '../../mock_data';
+import MemberActionButtons from '~/members/components/table/member_action_buttons.vue';
+import UserActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/user_action_buttons.vue';
+import GroupActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/group_action_buttons.vue';
+import InviteActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/invite_action_buttons.vue';
+import AccessRequestActionButtons from '~/members/components/action_buttons/access_request_action_buttons.vue';
 
 describe('MemberActionButtons', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_avatar_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/member_avatar_spec.js
index a171dd830c1..98177893c18 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_avatar_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/member_avatar_spec.js
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import { MEMBER_TYPES } from '~/vue_shared/components/members/constants';
-import { member as memberMock, group, invite, accessRequest } from '../mock_data';
-import MemberAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_avatar.vue';
-import UserAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/user_avatar.vue';
-import GroupAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/group_avatar.vue';
-import InviteAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/avatars/invite_avatar.vue';
+import { MEMBER_TYPES } from '~/members/constants';
+import { member as memberMock, group, invite, accessRequest } from '../../mock_data';
+import MemberAvatar from '~/members/components/table/member_avatar.vue';
+import UserAvatar from '~/members/components/avatars/user_avatar.vue';
+import GroupAvatar from '~/members/components/avatars/group_avatar.vue';
+import InviteAvatar from '~/members/components/avatars/invite_avatar.vue';
 
 describe('MemberList', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_source_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/member_source_spec.js
index 8b914d76674..48ac06f32f6 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_source_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/member_source_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import { mount, createWrapper } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { getByText as getByTextHelper } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { createMockDirective, getBinding } from 'helpers/vue_mock_directive';
-import MemberSource from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_source.vue';
+import MemberSource from '~/members/components/table/member_source.vue';
 
 describe('MemberSource', () => {
   let wrapper;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_table_cell_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/members_table_cell_spec.js
index ba693975a88..117c9255c00 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_table_cell_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/members_table_cell_spec.js
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 import { mount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
-import { MEMBER_TYPES } from '~/vue_shared/components/members/constants';
-import { member as memberMock, group, invite, accessRequest } from '../mock_data';
-import MembersTableCell from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/members_table_cell.vue';
+import { MEMBER_TYPES } from '~/members/constants';
+import { member as memberMock, group, invite, accessRequest } from '../../mock_data';
+import MembersTableCell from '~/members/components/table/members_table_cell.vue';
 
-describe('MemberList', () => {
+describe('MembersTableCell', () => {
   const WrappedComponent = {
     props: {
       memberType: {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/members_table_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/members_table_spec.js
index e593e88438c..9945cc7ee57 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/members_table_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/members_table_spec.js
@@ -6,21 +6,21 @@ import {
   within,
 } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { GlBadge, GlTable } from '@gitlab/ui';
-import MembersTable from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/members_table.vue';
-import MemberAvatar from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_avatar.vue';
-import MemberSource from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_source.vue';
-import ExpiresAt from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/expires_at.vue';
-import CreatedAt from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/created_at.vue';
-import RoleDropdown from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/role_dropdown.vue';
-import ExpirationDatepicker from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/expiration_datepicker.vue';
-import MemberActionButtons from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/member_action_buttons.vue';
+import MembersTable from '~/members/components/table/members_table.vue';
+import MemberAvatar from '~/members/components/table/member_avatar.vue';
+import MemberSource from '~/members/components/table/member_source.vue';
+import ExpiresAt from '~/members/components/table/expires_at.vue';
+import CreatedAt from '~/members/components/table/created_at.vue';
+import RoleDropdown from '~/members/components/table/role_dropdown.vue';
+import ExpirationDatepicker from '~/members/components/table/expiration_datepicker.vue';
+import MemberActionButtons from '~/members/components/table/member_action_buttons.vue';
 import * as initUserPopovers from '~/user_popovers';
-import { member as memberMock, invite, accessRequest } from '../mock_data';
+import { member as memberMock, invite, accessRequest } from '../../mock_data';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
 localVue.use(Vuex);
 
-describe('MemberList', () => {
+describe('MembersTable', () => {
   let wrapper;
 
   const createStore = (state = {}) => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/role_dropdown_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/role_dropdown_spec.js
index 55ec7000693..8ff1d2c1259 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/table/role_dropdown_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/components/table/role_dropdown_spec.js
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ import { within } from '@testing-library/dom';
 import { GlDropdown, GlDropdownItem } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import { GlBreakpointInstance as bp } from '@gitlab/ui/dist/utils';
 import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
-import RoleDropdown from '~/vue_shared/components/members/table/role_dropdown.vue';
-import { member } from '../mock_data';
+import RoleDropdown from '~/members/components/table/role_dropdown.vue';
+import { member } from '../../mock_data';
 
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
 localVue.use(Vuex);
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/members/mock_data.js
index 5674929716d..5674929716d 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/mock_data.js
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vuex_shared/modules/members/actions_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/store/actions_spec.js
index c7048a9c421..5424fee0750 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vuex_shared/modules/members/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/store/actions_spec.js
@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
 import { noop } from 'lodash';
 import axios from 'axios';
 import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
-import { members, group } from 'jest/vue_shared/components/members/mock_data';
+import { members, group } from 'jest/members/mock_data';
 import testAction from 'helpers/vuex_action_helper';
 import { useFakeDate } from 'helpers/fake_date';
 import httpStatusCodes from '~/lib/utils/http_status';
-import * as types from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutation_types';
+import * as types from '~/members/store/mutation_types';
 import {
   updateMemberRole,
   showRemoveGroupLinkModal,
   hideRemoveGroupLinkModal,
   updateMemberExpiration,
-} from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/actions';
+} from '~/members/store/actions';
 
 describe('Vuex members actions', () => {
   describe('update member actions', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutations_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/store/mutations_spec.js
index 710d43b8990..488bfdf15fd 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutations_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/store/mutations_spec.js
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-import { members, group } from 'jest/vue_shared/components/members/mock_data';
-import mutations from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutations';
-import * as types from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/mutation_types';
+import { members, group } from 'jest/members/mock_data';
+import mutations from '~/members/store/mutations';
+import * as types from '~/members/store/mutation_types';
 
 describe('Vuex members mutations', () => {
   describe('update member mutations', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vuex_shared/modules/members/utils_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/store/utils_spec.js
index 4fc3445dac0..e3cde38269c 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vuex_shared/modules/members/utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/store/utils_spec.js
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-import { members } from 'jest/vue_shared/components/members/mock_data';
-import { findMember } from '~/vuex_shared/modules/members/utils';
+import { members } from 'jest/members/mock_data';
+import { findMember } from '~/members/store/utils';
 
 describe('Members Vuex utils', () => {
   describe('findMember', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/utils_spec.js b/spec/frontend/members/utils_spec.js
index 3f2b2097133..a598b51d8dd 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/members/utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/members/utils_spec.js
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import {
   canResend,
   canUpdate,
   canOverride,
-} from '~/vue_shared/components/members/utils';
+} from '~/members/utils';
 import { member as memberMock, group, invite } from './mock_data';
 
 const DIRECT_MEMBER_ID = 178;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation_spec.js b/spec/frontend/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation_spec.js
index d203435e7bf..4114df618e5 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation_spec.js
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ describe('Discussion navigation mixin', () => {
     );
 
     jest.spyOn(utils, 'scrollToElementWithContext');
+    jest.spyOn(utils, 'scrollToElement');
 
     expandDiscussion = jest.fn();
     const { actions, ...notesRest } = notesModule();
@@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ describe('Discussion navigation mixin', () => {
         });
 
         it('scrolls to element', () => {
-          expect(utils.scrollToElementWithContext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+          expect(utils.scrollToElement).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
             findDiscussion('div.discussion', expected),
           );
         });
@@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ describe('Discussion navigation mixin', () => {
           });
 
           it('scrolls to discussion', () => {
-            expect(utils.scrollToElementWithContext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            expect(utils.scrollToElement).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
               findDiscussion('div.discussion', expected),
             );
           });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/notes/stores/actions_spec.js b/spec/frontend/notes/stores/actions_spec.js
index 920959f41e7..4a1d42647f8 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/notes/stores/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/notes/stores/actions_spec.js
@@ -944,10 +944,16 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
     it('when service success, commits and resolves discussion', done => {
       testSubmitSuggestion(done, () => {
         expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
           [mutationTypes.APPLY_SUGGESTION, { discussionId, noteId, suggestionId }],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
         ]);
 
-        expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([['resolveDiscussion', { discussionId }]]);
+        expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([
+          ['stopPolling'],
+          ['resolveDiscussion', { discussionId }],
+          ['restartPolling'],
+        ]);
         expect(Flash).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
       });
     });
@@ -958,8 +964,11 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       Api.applySuggestion.mockReturnValue(Promise.reject(response));
 
       testSubmitSuggestion(done, () => {
-        expect(commit).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        expect(dispatch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
+        ]);
+        expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([['stopPolling'], ['restartPolling']]);
         expect(Flash).toHaveBeenCalledWith(TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE, 'alert', flashContainer);
       });
     });
@@ -970,8 +979,11 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       Api.applySuggestion.mockReturnValue(Promise.reject(response));
 
       testSubmitSuggestion(done, () => {
-        expect(commit).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        expect(dispatch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
+        ]);
+        expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([['stopPolling'], ['restartPolling']]);
         expect(Flash).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
           'Something went wrong while applying the suggestion. Please try again.',
           'alert',
@@ -1015,15 +1027,19 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       testSubmitSuggestionBatch(done, () => {
         expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, true],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
           [mutationTypes.APPLY_SUGGESTION, batchSuggestionsInfo[0]],
           [mutationTypes.APPLY_SUGGESTION, batchSuggestionsInfo[1]],
           [mutationTypes.CLEAR_SUGGESTION_BATCH],
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, false],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
         ]);
 
         expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([
+          ['stopPolling'],
           ['resolveDiscussion', { discussionId: discussionIds[0] }],
           ['resolveDiscussion', { discussionId: discussionIds[1] }],
+          ['restartPolling'],
         ]);
 
         expect(Flash).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
@@ -1038,10 +1054,12 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       testSubmitSuggestionBatch(done, () => {
         expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, true],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, false],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
         ]);
 
-        expect(dispatch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([['stopPolling'], ['restartPolling']]);
         expect(Flash).toHaveBeenCalledWith(TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE, 'alert', flashContainer);
       });
     });
@@ -1054,10 +1072,12 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       testSubmitSuggestionBatch(done, () => {
         expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, true],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, false],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
         ]);
 
-        expect(dispatch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(dispatch.mock.calls).toEqual([['stopPolling'], ['restartPolling']]);
         expect(Flash).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
           'Something went wrong while applying the batch of suggestions. Please try again.',
           'alert',
@@ -1072,10 +1092,12 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       testSubmitSuggestionBatch(done, () => {
         expect(commit.mock.calls).toEqual([
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, true],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, true],
           [mutationTypes.APPLY_SUGGESTION, batchSuggestionsInfo[0]],
           [mutationTypes.APPLY_SUGGESTION, batchSuggestionsInfo[1]],
           [mutationTypes.CLEAR_SUGGESTION_BATCH],
           [mutationTypes.SET_APPLYING_BATCH_STATE, false],
+          [mutationTypes.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION, false],
         ]);
 
         expect(Flash).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
diff --git a/spec/frontend/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js b/spec/frontend/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js
index 2618c3a53b8..922918ef50b 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js
@@ -377,6 +377,16 @@ describe('Notes Store mutations', () => {
     });
   });
 
+  describe('SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION', () => {
+    it('should set resolving discussion state', () => {
+      const state = {};
+
+      mutations.SET_RESOLVING_DISCUSSION(state, true);
+
+      expect(state.isResolvingDiscussion).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('UPDATE_NOTE', () => {
     it('should update a note', () => {
       const state = {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/packages/list/components/__snapshots__/packages_list_app_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/packages/list/components/__snapshots__/packages_list_app_spec.js.snap
index d27038e765f..c51130dae00 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/packages/list/components/__snapshots__/packages_list_app_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/packages/list/components/__snapshots__/packages_list_app_spec.js.snap
@@ -202,6 +202,67 @@ exports[`packages_list_app renders 1`] = `
       </b-tab-stub>
       <b-tab-stub
         tag="div"
+        title="Generic"
+        titlelinkclass="gl-tab-nav-item"
+      >
+        <template>
+          <div>
+            <section
+              class="row empty-state text-center"
+            >
+              <div
+                class="col-12"
+              >
+                <div
+                  class="svg-250 svg-content"
+                >
+                  <img
+                    alt="There are no Generic packages yet"
+                    class="gl-max-w-full"
+                    src="helpSvg"
+                  />
+                </div>
+              </div>
+               
+              <div
+                class="col-12"
+              >
+                <div
+                  class="text-content gl-mx-auto gl-my-0 gl-p-5"
+                >
+                  <h1
+                    class="h4"
+                  >
+                    There are no Generic packages yet
+                  </h1>
+                   
+                  <p>
+                    Learn how to 
+                    <b-link-stub
+                      class="gl-link"
+                      event="click"
+                      href="helpUrl"
+                      routertag="a"
+                      target="_blank"
+                    >
+                      publish and share your packages
+                    </b-link-stub>
+                     with GitLab.
+                  </p>
+                   
+                  <div>
+                    <!---->
+                     
+                    <!---->
+                  </div>
+                </div>
+              </div>
+            </section>
+          </div>
+        </template>
+      </b-tab-stub>
+      <b-tab-stub
+        tag="div"
         title="Maven"
         titlelinkclass="gl-tab-nav-item"
       >
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/commit/commit_form_spec.js b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/commit/commit_form_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ae2a9e5065d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/commit/commit_form_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+import { shallowMount, mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlFormInput, GlFormTextarea } from '@gitlab/ui';
+
+import CommitForm from '~/pipeline_editor/components/commit/commit_form.vue';
+
+import { mockCommitMessage, mockDefaultBranch } from '../../mock_data';
+
+describe('~/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app.vue', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+
+  const createComponent = ({ props = {} } = {}, mountFn = shallowMount) => {
+    wrapper = mountFn(CommitForm, {
+      propsData: {
+        defaultMessage: mockCommitMessage,
+        defaultBranch: mockDefaultBranch,
+        ...props,
+      },
+
+      // attachToDocument is required for input/submit events
+      attachToDocument: mountFn === mount,
+    });
+  };
+
+  const findCommitTextarea = () => wrapper.find(GlFormTextarea);
+  const findBranchInput = () => wrapper.find(GlFormInput);
+  const findNewMrCheckbox = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="new-mr-checkbox"]');
+  const findSubmitBtn = () => wrapper.find('[type="submit"]');
+  const findCancelBtn = () => wrapper.find('[type="reset"]');
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  describe('when the form is displayed', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      createComponent();
+    });
+
+    it('shows a default commit message', () => {
+      expect(findCommitTextarea().attributes('value')).toBe(mockCommitMessage);
+    });
+
+    it('shows a default branch', () => {
+      expect(findBranchInput().attributes('value')).toBe(mockDefaultBranch);
+    });
+
+    it('shows buttons', () => {
+      expect(findSubmitBtn().exists()).toBe(true);
+      expect(findCancelBtn().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('does not show a new MR checkbox by default', () => {
+      expect(findNewMrCheckbox().exists()).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when buttons are clicked', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      createComponent({}, mount);
+    });
+
+    it('emits an event when the form submits', () => {
+      findSubmitBtn().trigger('click');
+
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('submit')[0]).toEqual([
+        {
+          message: mockCommitMessage,
+          branch: mockDefaultBranch,
+          openMergeRequest: false,
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    it('emits an event when the form resets', () => {
+      findCancelBtn().trigger('click');
+
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('cancel')).toHaveLength(1);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when user inputs values', () => {
+    const anotherMessage = 'Another commit message';
+    const anotherBranch = 'my-branch';
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      createComponent({}, mount);
+
+      findCommitTextarea().setValue(anotherMessage);
+      findBranchInput().setValue(anotherBranch);
+    });
+
+    it('shows a new MR checkbox', () => {
+      expect(findNewMrCheckbox().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('emits an event with values', async () => {
+      await findNewMrCheckbox().setChecked();
+      await findSubmitBtn().trigger('click');
+
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('submit')[0]).toEqual([
+        {
+          message: anotherMessage,
+          branch: anotherBranch,
+          openMergeRequest: true,
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    it('when the commit message is empty, submit button is disabled', async () => {
+      await findCommitTextarea().setValue('');
+
+      expect(findSubmitBtn().attributes('disabled')).toBe('disabled');
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor_spec.js b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor_spec.js
index 39d205839f4..18f71ebc95c 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor_spec.js
@@ -6,12 +6,16 @@ import TextEditor from '~/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor.vue';
 
 describe('~/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor.vue', () => {
   let wrapper;
+  const editorReadyListener = jest.fn();
 
-  const createComponent = (props = {}, mountFn = shallowMount) => {
+  const createComponent = (attrs = {}, mountFn = shallowMount) => {
     wrapper = mountFn(TextEditor, {
-      propsData: {
+      attrs: {
         value: mockCiYml,
-        ...props,
+        ...attrs,
+      },
+      listeners: {
+        'editor-ready': editorReadyListener,
       },
     });
   };
@@ -28,14 +32,13 @@ describe('~/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor.vue', () => {
     expect(findEditor().props('value')).toBe(mockCiYml);
   });
 
-  it('editor is readony and configured for .yml', () => {
-    expect(findEditor().props('editorOptions')).toEqual({ readOnly: true });
+  it('editor is configured for .yml', () => {
     expect(findEditor().props('fileName')).toBe('*.yml');
   });
 
-  it('bubbles up editor-ready event', () => {
+  it('bubbles up events', () => {
     findEditor().vm.$emit('editor-ready');
 
-    expect(wrapper.emitted('editor-ready')).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(editorReadyListener).toHaveBeenCalled();
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/mock_data.js
index 96fa6e5e004..3073b748e50 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/mock_data.js
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 export const mockProjectPath = 'user1/project1';
 export const mockDefaultBranch = 'master';
+export const mockNewMergeRequestPath = '/-/merge_requests/new';
+export const mockCommitId = 'aabbccdd';
+export const mockCommitMessage = 'My commit message';
 
 export const mockCiConfigPath = '.gitlab-ci.yml';
 export const mockCiYml = `
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app_spec.js b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app_spec.js
index 46523baadf3..c6dafc6e258 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app_spec.js
@@ -1,32 +1,82 @@
 import { nextTick } from 'vue';
-import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
-import { GlAlert, GlLoadingIcon, GlTabs, GlTab } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { mount, shallowMount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import {
+  GlAlert,
+  GlButton,
+  GlFormInput,
+  GlFormTextarea,
+  GlLoadingIcon,
+  GlTabs,
+  GlTab,
+} from '@gitlab/ui';
+import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
+import VueApollo from 'vue-apollo';
+import createMockApollo from 'jest/helpers/mock_apollo_helper';
+
+import { redirectTo, refreshCurrentPage, objectToQuery } from '~/lib/utils/url_utility';
+import {
+  mockCiConfigPath,
+  mockCiYml,
+  mockCommitId,
+  mockCommitMessage,
+  mockDefaultBranch,
+  mockProjectPath,
+  mockNewMergeRequestPath,
+} from './mock_data';
 
-import { mockProjectPath, mockDefaultBranch, mockCiConfigPath, mockCiYml } from './mock_data';
 import TextEditor from '~/pipeline_editor/components/text_editor.vue';
-import EditorLite from '~/vue_shared/components/editor_lite.vue';
 import PipelineGraph from '~/pipelines/components/pipeline_graph/pipeline_graph.vue';
 import PipelineEditorApp from '~/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app.vue';
+import CommitForm from '~/pipeline_editor/components/commit/commit_form.vue';
+
+const localVue = createLocalVue();
+localVue.use(VueApollo);
+
+jest.mock('~/lib/utils/url_utility', () => ({
+  redirectTo: jest.fn(),
+  refreshCurrentPage: jest.fn(),
+  objectToQuery: jest.requireActual('~/lib/utils/url_utility').objectToQuery,
+  mergeUrlParams: jest.requireActual('~/lib/utils/url_utility').mergeUrlParams,
+}));
 
 describe('~/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app.vue', () => {
   let wrapper;
 
-  const createComponent = (
-    { props = {}, data = {}, loading = false } = {},
+  let mockMutate;
+  let mockApollo;
+  let mockBlobContentData;
+
+  const createComponent = ({
+    props = {},
+    loading = false,
+    options = {},
     mountFn = shallowMount,
-  ) => {
+  } = {}) => {
+    mockMutate = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({
+      data: {
+        commitCreate: {
+          errors: [],
+          commit: {},
+        },
+      },
+    });
+
     wrapper = mountFn(PipelineEditorApp, {
       propsData: {
-        projectPath: mockProjectPath,
-        defaultBranch: mockDefaultBranch,
         ciConfigPath: mockCiConfigPath,
+        commitId: mockCommitId,
+        defaultBranch: mockDefaultBranch,
+        projectPath: mockProjectPath,
+        newMergeRequestPath: mockNewMergeRequestPath,
         ...props,
       },
-      data() {
-        return data;
-      },
       stubs: {
         GlTabs,
+        GlButton,
+        CommitForm,
+        EditorLite: {
+          template: '<div/>',
+        },
         TextEditor,
       },
       mocks: {
@@ -36,45 +86,73 @@ describe('~/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app.vue', () => {
               loading,
             },
           },
+          mutate: mockMutate,
         },
       },
+      // attachToDocument is required for input/submit events
+      attachToDocument: mountFn === mount,
+      ...options,
     });
   };
 
+  const createComponentWithApollo = ({ props = {}, mountFn = shallowMount } = {}) => {
+    mockApollo = createMockApollo([], {
+      Query: {
+        blobContent() {
+          return {
+            __typename: 'BlobContent',
+            rawData: mockBlobContentData(),
+          };
+        },
+      },
+    });
+
+    const options = {
+      localVue,
+      mocks: {},
+      apolloProvider: mockApollo,
+    };
+
+    createComponent({ props, options }, mountFn);
+  };
+
   const findLoadingIcon = () => wrapper.find(GlLoadingIcon);
   const findAlert = () => wrapper.find(GlAlert);
   const findTabAt = i => wrapper.findAll(GlTab).at(i);
-  const findEditorLite = () => wrapper.find(EditorLite);
+  const findTextEditor = () => wrapper.find(TextEditor);
+  const findCommitForm = () => wrapper.find(CommitForm);
+  const findCommitBtnLoadingIcon = () => wrapper.find('[type="submit"]').find(GlLoadingIcon);
 
   beforeEach(() => {
-    createComponent();
+    mockBlobContentData = jest.fn();
   });
 
   afterEach(() => {
+    mockBlobContentData.mockReset();
+    refreshCurrentPage.mockReset();
+    redirectTo.mockReset();
+    mockMutate.mockReset();
+
     wrapper.destroy();
     wrapper = null;
   });
 
-  it('displays content', () => {
-    createComponent({ data: { content: mockCiYml } });
-
-    expect(findLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(false);
-    expect(findEditorLite().props('value')).toBe(mockCiYml);
-  });
-
   it('displays a loading icon if the query is loading', () => {
     createComponent({ loading: true });
 
     expect(findLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(true);
+    expect(findTextEditor().exists()).toBe(false);
   });
 
   describe('tabs', () => {
-    it('displays tabs and their content', () => {
-      createComponent({ data: { content: mockCiYml } });
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      createComponent();
+    });
 
+    it('displays tabs and their content', async () => {
       expect(
         findTabAt(0)
-          .find(EditorLite)
+          .find(TextEditor)
           .exists(),
       ).toBe(true);
       expect(
@@ -85,55 +163,234 @@ describe('~/pipeline_editor/pipeline_editor_app.vue', () => {
     });
 
     it('displays editor tab lazily, until editor is ready', async () => {
-      createComponent({ data: { content: mockCiYml } });
-
       expect(findTabAt(0).attributes('lazy')).toBe('true');
 
-      findEditorLite().vm.$emit('editor-ready');
+      findTextEditor().vm.$emit('editor-ready');
+
       await nextTick();
 
       expect(findTabAt(0).attributes('lazy')).toBe(undefined);
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when in error state', () => {
-    class MockError extends Error {
-      constructor(message, data) {
-        super(message);
-        if (data) {
-          this.networkError = {
-            response: { data },
-          };
+  describe('when data is set', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      createComponent({ mountFn: mount });
+
+      wrapper.setData({
+        content: mockCiYml,
+        contentModel: mockCiYml,
+      });
+
+      await nextTick();
+    });
+
+    it('displays content after the query loads', () => {
+      expect(findLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(false);
+      expect(findTextEditor().attributes('value')).toBe(mockCiYml);
+    });
+
+    describe('commit form', () => {
+      const mockVariables = {
+        content: mockCiYml,
+        filePath: mockCiConfigPath,
+        lastCommitId: mockCommitId,
+        message: mockCommitMessage,
+        projectPath: mockProjectPath,
+        startBranch: mockDefaultBranch,
+      };
+
+      const findInForm = selector => findCommitForm().find(selector);
+
+      const submitCommit = async ({
+        message = mockCommitMessage,
+        branch = mockDefaultBranch,
+        openMergeRequest = false,
+      } = {}) => {
+        await findInForm(GlFormTextarea).setValue(message);
+        await findInForm(GlFormInput).setValue(branch);
+        if (openMergeRequest) {
+          await findInForm('[data-testid="new-mr-checkbox"]').setChecked(openMergeRequest);
         }
-      }
-    }
+        await findInForm('[type="submit"]').trigger('click');
+      };
+
+      const cancelCommitForm = async () => {
+        const findCancelBtn = () => wrapper.find('[type="reset"]');
+        await findCancelBtn().trigger('click');
+      };
+
+      describe('when the user commits changes to the current branch', () => {
+        beforeEach(async () => {
+          await submitCommit();
+        });
+
+        it('calls the mutation with the default branch', () => {
+          expect(mockMutate).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            mutation: expect.any(Object),
+            variables: {
+              ...mockVariables,
+              branch: mockDefaultBranch,
+            },
+          });
+        });
 
-    it('shows a generic error', () => {
-      const error = new MockError('An error message');
-      createComponent({ data: { error } });
+        it('refreshes the page', () => {
+          expect(refreshCurrentPage).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        });
 
-      expect(findAlert().text()).toBe('CI file could not be loaded: An error message');
+        it('shows no saving state', () => {
+          expect(findCommitBtnLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(false);
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('when the user commits changes to a new branch', () => {
+        const newBranch = 'new-branch';
+
+        beforeEach(async () => {
+          await submitCommit({
+            branch: newBranch,
+          });
+        });
+
+        it('calls the mutation with the new branch', () => {
+          expect(mockMutate).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            mutation: expect.any(Object),
+            variables: {
+              ...mockVariables,
+              branch: newBranch,
+            },
+          });
+        });
+
+        it('refreshes the page', () => {
+          expect(refreshCurrentPage).toHaveBeenCalledWith();
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('when the user commits changes to open a new merge request', () => {
+        const newBranch = 'new-branch';
+
+        beforeEach(async () => {
+          await submitCommit({
+            branch: newBranch,
+            openMergeRequest: true,
+          });
+        });
+
+        it('redirects to the merge request page with source and target branches', () => {
+          const branchesQuery = objectToQuery({
+            'merge_request[source_branch]': newBranch,
+            'merge_request[target_branch]': mockDefaultBranch,
+          });
+
+          expect(redirectTo).toHaveBeenCalledWith(`${mockNewMergeRequestPath}?${branchesQuery}`);
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('when the commit is ocurring', () => {
+        it('shows a saving state', async () => {
+          await mockMutate.mockImplementationOnce(() => {
+            expect(findCommitBtnLoadingIcon().exists()).toBe(true);
+            return Promise.resolve();
+          });
+
+          await submitCommit({
+            message: mockCommitMessage,
+            branch: mockDefaultBranch,
+            openMergeRequest: false,
+          });
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('when the commit fails', () => {
+        it('shows a the error message', async () => {
+          mockMutate.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('commit failed'));
+
+          await submitCommit();
+
+          await waitForPromises();
+
+          expect(findAlert().text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(
+            'The GitLab CI configuration could not be updated. commit failed',
+          );
+        });
+
+        it('shows an unkown error', async () => {
+          mockMutate.mockRejectedValueOnce();
+
+          await submitCommit();
+
+          await waitForPromises();
+
+          expect(findAlert().text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(
+            'The GitLab CI configuration could not be updated.',
+          );
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('when the commit form is cancelled', () => {
+        const otherContent = 'other content';
+
+        beforeEach(async () => {
+          findTextEditor().vm.$emit('input', otherContent);
+          await nextTick();
+        });
+
+        it('content is restored after cancel is called', async () => {
+          await cancelCommitForm();
+
+          expect(findTextEditor().attributes('value')).toBe(mockCiYml);
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('displays fetch content errors', () => {
+    it('no error is show when data is set', async () => {
+      mockBlobContentData.mockResolvedValue(mockCiYml);
+      createComponentWithApollo();
+
+      await waitForPromises();
+
+      expect(findAlert().exists()).toBe(false);
+      expect(findTextEditor().attributes('value')).toBe(mockCiYml);
     });
 
-    it('shows a ref missing error state', () => {
-      const error = new MockError('Ref missing!', {
-        error: 'ref is missing, ref is empty',
+    it('shows a 404 error message', async () => {
+      mockBlobContentData.mockRejectedValueOnce({
+        response: {
+          status: 404,
+        },
       });
-      createComponent({ data: { error } });
+      createComponentWithApollo();
 
-      expect(findAlert().text()).toMatch(
-        'CI file could not be loaded: ref is missing, ref is empty',
-      );
+      await waitForPromises();
+
+      expect(findAlert().text()).toMatch('No CI file found in this repository, please add one.');
     });
 
-    it('shows a file missing error state', async () => {
-      const error = new MockError('File missing!', {
-        message: 'file not found',
+    it('shows a 400 error message', async () => {
+      mockBlobContentData.mockRejectedValueOnce({
+        response: {
+          status: 400,
+        },
       });
+      createComponentWithApollo();
+
+      await waitForPromises();
+
+      expect(findAlert().text()).toMatch(
+        'Repository does not have a default branch, please set one.',
+      );
+    });
 
-      await wrapper.setData({ error });
+    it('shows a unkown error message', async () => {
+      mockBlobContentData.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('My error!'));
+      createComponentWithApollo();
+      await waitForPromises();
 
-      expect(findAlert().text()).toMatch('CI file could not be loaded: file not found');
+      expect(findAlert().text()).toMatch('The CI configuration was not loaded, please try again.');
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/getters_spec.js b/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/getters_spec.js
index 58e8065033f..8cef499fdb9 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/getters_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/getters_spec.js
@@ -10,11 +10,19 @@ describe('Getters TestReports Store', () => {
   const defaultState = {
     testReports,
     selectedSuiteIndex: 0,
+    pageInfo: {
+      page: 1,
+      perPage: 2,
+    },
   };
 
   const emptyState = {
     testReports: {},
     selectedSuite: null,
+    pageInfo: {
+      page: 1,
+      perPage: 2,
+    },
   };
 
   beforeEach(() => {
@@ -59,15 +67,17 @@ describe('Getters TestReports Store', () => {
   });
 
   describe('getSuiteTests', () => {
-    it('should return the test cases inside the suite', () => {
+    it('should return the current page of test cases inside the suite', () => {
       setupState();
 
       const cases = getters.getSuiteTests(state);
-      const expected = testReports.test_suites[0].test_cases.map(x => ({
-        ...x,
-        formattedTime: formattedTime(x.execution_time),
-        icon: iconForTestStatus(x.status),
-      }));
+      const expected = testReports.test_suites[0].test_cases
+        .map(x => ({
+          ...x,
+          formattedTime: formattedTime(x.execution_time),
+          icon: iconForTestStatus(x.status),
+        }))
+        .slice(0, state.pageInfo.perPage);
 
       expect(cases).toEqual(expected);
     });
@@ -78,4 +88,15 @@ describe('Getters TestReports Store', () => {
       expect(getters.getSuiteTests(state)).toEqual([]);
     });
   });
+
+  describe('getSuiteTestCount', () => {
+    it('should return the total number of test cases', () => {
+      setupState();
+
+      const testCount = getters.getSuiteTestCount(state);
+      const expected = testReports.test_suites[0].test_cases.length;
+
+      expect(testCount).toEqual(expected);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/mutations_spec.js b/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/mutations_spec.js
index b935029bc6a..191e9e7391c 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/mutations_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/stores/mutations_spec.js
@@ -12,12 +12,25 @@ describe('Mutations TestReports Store', () => {
     testReports: {},
     selectedSuite: null,
     isLoading: false,
+    pageInfo: {
+      page: 1,
+      perPage: 2,
+    },
   };
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     mockState = { ...defaultState };
   });
 
+  describe('set page', () => {
+    it('should set the current page to display', () => {
+      const pageToDisplay = 3;
+      mutations[types.SET_PAGE](mockState, pageToDisplay);
+
+      expect(mockState.pageInfo.page).toEqual(pageToDisplay);
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('set suite', () => {
     it('should set the suite at the given index', () => {
       mockState.testReports = testReports;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/test_suite_table_spec.js b/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/test_suite_table_spec.js
index 284099b000b..0e00ca670a7 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/test_suite_table_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/pipelines/test_reports/test_suite_table_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import Vuex from 'vuex';
 import { shallowMount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import { getJSONFixture } from 'helpers/fixtures';
-import { GlButton, GlFriendlyWrap } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { GlButton, GlFriendlyWrap, GlPagination } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import SuiteTable from '~/pipelines/components/test_reports/test_suite_table.vue';
 import * as getters from '~/pipelines/stores/test_reports/getters';
 import { TestStatus } from '~/pipelines/constants';
@@ -26,13 +26,17 @@ describe('Test reports suite table', () => {
   const findCaseRowAtIndex = index => wrapper.findAll('.js-case-row').at(index);
   const findIconForRow = (row, status) => row.find(`.ci-status-icon-${status}`);
 
-  const createComponent = (suite = testSuite) => {
+  const createComponent = (suite = testSuite, perPage = 20) => {
     store = new Vuex.Store({
       state: {
         testReports: {
           test_suites: [suite],
         },
         selectedSuiteIndex: 0,
+        pageInfo: {
+          page: 1,
+          perPage,
+        },
       },
       getters,
     });
@@ -86,4 +90,20 @@ describe('Test reports suite table', () => {
       expect(button.attributes('data-clipboard-text')).toBe(file);
     });
   });
+
+  describe('when a test suite has more test cases than the pagination size', () => {
+    const perPage = 2;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      createComponent(testSuite, perPage);
+    });
+
+    it('renders one page of test cases', () => {
+      expect(allCaseRows().length).toBe(perPage);
+    });
+
+    it('renders a pagination component', () => {
+      expect(wrapper.find(GlPagination).exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_dropdown_spec.js b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_dropdown_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e0cac317ad6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_dropdown_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlFormGroup, GlFormSelect } from 'jest/registry/shared/stubs';
+import component from '~/registry/settings/components/expiration_dropdown.vue';
+
+describe('ExpirationDropdown', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+
+  const defaultProps = {
+    name: 'foo',
+    label: 'label-bar',
+    formOptions: [{ key: 'foo', label: 'bar' }, { key: 'baz', label: 'zab' }],
+  };
+
+  const findFormSelect = () => wrapper.find(GlFormSelect);
+  const findFormGroup = () => wrapper.find(GlFormGroup);
+  const findOptions = () => wrapper.findAll('[data-testid="option"]');
+
+  const mountComponent = props => {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(component, {
+      stubs: {
+        GlFormGroup,
+        GlFormSelect,
+      },
+      propsData: {
+        ...defaultProps,
+        ...props,
+      },
+    });
+  };
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  describe('structure', () => {
+    it('has a form-select component', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+      expect(findFormSelect().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('has the correct options', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findOptions()).toHaveLength(defaultProps.formOptions.length);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('model', () => {
+    it('assign the right props to the form-select component', () => {
+      const value = 'foobar';
+      const disabled = true;
+
+      mountComponent({ value, disabled });
+
+      expect(findFormSelect().props()).toMatchObject({
+        value,
+        disabled,
+      });
+      expect(findFormSelect().attributes('id')).toBe(defaultProps.name);
+    });
+
+    it('assign the right props to the form-group component', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findFormGroup().attributes()).toMatchObject({
+        id: `${defaultProps.name}-form-group`,
+        'label-for': defaultProps.name,
+        label: defaultProps.label,
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('emits input event when form-select emits input', () => {
+      const emittedValue = 'barfoo';
+
+      mountComponent();
+
+      findFormSelect().vm.$emit('input', emittedValue);
+
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('input')).toEqual([[emittedValue]]);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_run_text_spec.js b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_run_text_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d023f1fd05a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_run_text_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlFormInput } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { GlFormGroup } from 'jest/registry/shared/stubs';
+import component from '~/registry/settings/components/expiration_run_text.vue';
+import { NEXT_CLEANUP_LABEL, NOT_SCHEDULED_POLICY_TEXT } from '~/registry/settings/constants';
+
+describe('ExpirationToggle', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+  const value = 'foo';
+
+  const findInput = () => wrapper.find(GlFormInput);
+  const findFormGroup = () => wrapper.find(GlFormGroup);
+
+  const mountComponent = propsData => {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(component, {
+      stubs: {
+        GlFormGroup,
+      },
+      propsData,
+    });
+  };
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  describe('structure', () => {
+    it('has an input component', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+      expect(findInput().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('model', () => {
+    it('assigns the right props to the input component', () => {
+      mountComponent({ value, disabled: true });
+
+      expect(findInput().attributes()).toMatchObject({
+        value,
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('assigns the right props to the form-group component', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findFormGroup().attributes()).toMatchObject({
+        label: NEXT_CLEANUP_LABEL,
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('formattedValue', () => {
+    it('displays the values when it exists', () => {
+      mountComponent({ value });
+
+      expect(findInput().attributes('value')).toBe(value);
+    });
+
+    it('displays a placeholder when no value is present', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findInput().attributes('value')).toBe(NOT_SCHEDULED_POLICY_TEXT);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_textarea_spec.js b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_textarea_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..80464c61117
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_textarea_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlSprintf, GlFormTextarea, GlLink } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { GlFormGroup } from 'jest/registry/shared/stubs';
+import component from '~/registry/settings/components/expiration_textarea.vue';
+import { NAME_REGEX_LENGTH } from '~/registry/shared/constants';
+
+describe('ExpirationTextarea', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+
+  const defaultProps = {
+    name: 'foo',
+    label: 'label-bar',
+    placeholder: 'placeholder-baz',
+    description: '%{linkStart}description-foo%{linkEnd}',
+  };
+
+  const tagsRegexHelpPagePath = 'fooPath';
+
+  const findTextArea = () => wrapper.find(GlFormTextarea);
+  const findFormGroup = () => wrapper.find(GlFormGroup);
+  const findLabel = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="label"]');
+  const findDescription = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="description"]');
+  const findDescriptionLink = () => wrapper.find(GlLink);
+
+  const mountComponent = props => {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(component, {
+      stubs: {
+        GlSprintf,
+        GlFormGroup,
+      },
+      provide: {
+        tagsRegexHelpPagePath,
+      },
+      propsData: {
+        ...defaultProps,
+        ...props,
+      },
+    });
+  };
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  describe('structure', () => {
+    it('has a label', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findLabel().text()).toBe(defaultProps.label);
+    });
+
+    it('has a textarea component', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findTextArea().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('has a description', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findDescription().text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(defaultProps.description);
+    });
+
+    it('has a description link', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      const link = findDescriptionLink();
+      expect(link.exists()).toBe(true);
+      expect(link.attributes('href')).toBe(tagsRegexHelpPagePath);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('model', () => {
+    it('assigns the right props to the textarea component', () => {
+      const value = 'foobar';
+      const disabled = true;
+
+      mountComponent({ value, disabled });
+
+      expect(findTextArea().attributes()).toMatchObject({
+        id: defaultProps.name,
+        value,
+        placeholder: defaultProps.placeholder,
+        disabled: `${disabled}`,
+        trim: '',
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('emits input event when textarea emits input', () => {
+      const emittedValue = 'barfoo';
+
+      mountComponent();
+
+      findTextArea().vm.$emit('input', emittedValue);
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('input')).toEqual([[emittedValue]]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('regex textarea validation', () => {
+    const invalidString = new Array(NAME_REGEX_LENGTH + 2).join(',');
+
+    describe('when error contains an error message', () => {
+      const errorMessage = 'something went wrong';
+
+      it('shows the error message on the relevant field', () => {
+        mountComponent({ error: errorMessage });
+
+        expect(findFormGroup().attributes('invalid-feedback')).toBe(errorMessage);
+      });
+
+      it('gives precedence to API errors compared to local ones', () => {
+        mountComponent({
+          error: errorMessage,
+          value: invalidString,
+        });
+
+        expect(findFormGroup().attributes('invalid-feedback')).toBe(errorMessage);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when error is empty', () => {
+      describe('if the user did not type', () => {
+        it('validation is not emitted', () => {
+          mountComponent();
+
+          expect(wrapper.emitted('validation')).toBeUndefined();
+        });
+
+        it('no error message is shown', () => {
+          mountComponent();
+
+          expect(findFormGroup().props('state')).toBe(true);
+          expect(findFormGroup().attributes('invalid-feedback')).toBe('');
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('when the user typed something', () => {
+        describe(`when name regex is longer than ${NAME_REGEX_LENGTH}`, () => {
+          beforeEach(() => {
+            // since the component has no state we both emit the event and set the prop
+            mountComponent({ value: invalidString });
+
+            findTextArea().vm.$emit('input', invalidString);
+          });
+
+          it('textAreaValidation state is false', () => {
+            expect(findFormGroup().props('state')).toBe(false);
+            expect(findTextArea().attributes('state')).toBeUndefined();
+          });
+
+          it('emits the @validation event with false payload', () => {
+            expect(wrapper.emitted('validation')).toEqual([[false]]);
+          });
+        });
+
+        it(`when user input is less than ${NAME_REGEX_LENGTH} state is "true"`, () => {
+          mountComponent();
+
+          findTextArea().vm.$emit('input', 'foo');
+
+          expect(findFormGroup().props('state')).toBe(true);
+          expect(findTextArea().attributes('state')).toBe('true');
+          expect(wrapper.emitted('validation')).toEqual([[true]]);
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_toggle_spec.js b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_toggle_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8b670c98dc1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/components/expiration_toggle_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlToggle, GlSprintf } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { GlFormGroup } from 'jest/registry/shared/stubs';
+import component from '~/registry/settings/components/expiration_toggle.vue';
+import {
+  ENABLE_TOGGLE_DESCRIPTION,
+  ENABLED_TEXT,
+  DISABLED_TEXT,
+} from '~/registry/settings/constants';
+
+describe('ExpirationToggle', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+
+  const findToggle = () => wrapper.find(GlToggle);
+  const findDescription = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="description"]');
+
+  const mountComponent = propsData => {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(component, {
+      stubs: {
+        GlFormGroup,
+        GlSprintf,
+      },
+      propsData,
+    });
+  };
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  describe('structure', () => {
+    it('has a toggle component', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findToggle().exists()).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('has a description', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      expect(findDescription().text()).toContain(
+        ENABLE_TOGGLE_DESCRIPTION.replace('%{toggleStatus}', ''),
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('model', () => {
+    it('assigns the right props to the toggle component', () => {
+      mountComponent({ value: true, disabled: true });
+
+      expect(findToggle().props()).toMatchObject({
+        value: true,
+        disabled: true,
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('emits input event when toggle is updated', () => {
+      mountComponent();
+
+      findToggle().vm.$emit('change', false);
+
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('input')).toEqual([[false]]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('toggle description', () => {
+    it('says enabled when the toggle is on', () => {
+      mountComponent({ value: true });
+
+      expect(findDescription().text()).toContain(ENABLED_TEXT);
+    });
+
+    it('says disabled when the toggle is off', () => {
+      mountComponent({ value: false });
+
+      expect(findDescription().text()).toContain(DISABLED_TEXT);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/registry/settings/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/mock_data.js
index 7f3772ce7fe..7cc645fcf55 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/registry/settings/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/registry/settings/mock_data.js
@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
+export const containerExpirationPolicyData = () => ({
+  cadence: 'EVERY_DAY',
+  enabled: true,
+  keepN: 'TEN_TAGS',
+  nameRegex: 'asdasdssssdfdf',
+  nameRegexKeep: 'sss',
+  olderThan: 'FOURTEEN_DAYS',
+  nextRunAt: '2020-11-19T07:37:03.941Z',
+});
+
 export const expirationPolicyPayload = override => ({
   data: {
     project: {
       containerExpirationPolicy: {
-        cadence: 'EVERY_DAY',
-        enabled: true,
-        keepN: 'TEN_TAGS',
-        nameRegex: 'asdasdssssdfdf',
-        nameRegexKeep: 'sss',
-        olderThan: 'FOURTEEN_DAYS',
+        ...containerExpirationPolicyData(),
         ...override,
       },
     },
@@ -26,12 +31,7 @@ export const expirationPolicyMutationPayload = ({ override, errors = [] } = {})
   data: {
     updateContainerExpirationPolicy: {
       containerExpirationPolicy: {
-        cadence: 'EVERY_DAY',
-        enabled: true,
-        keepN: 'TEN_TAGS',
-        nameRegex: 'asdasdssssdfdf',
-        nameRegexKeep: 'sss',
-        olderThan: 'FOURTEEN_DAYS',
+        ...containerExpirationPolicyData(),
         ...override,
       },
       errors,
diff --git a/spec/frontend/registry/shared/stubs.js b/spec/frontend/registry/shared/stubs.js
index f6b88d70e49..ad41eb42df4 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/registry/shared/stubs.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/registry/shared/stubs.js
@@ -9,3 +9,23 @@ export const GlCard = {
 </div>
 `,
 };
+
+export const GlFormGroup = {
+  name: 'gl-form-group-stub',
+  props: ['state'],
+  template: `
+  <div>
+    <slot name="label"></slot>
+    <slot></slot>
+    <slot name="description"></slot>
+  </div>`,
+};
+
+export const GlFormSelect = {
+  name: 'gl-form-select-stub',
+  props: ['disabled', 'value'],
+  template: `
+  <div>
+    <slot></slot>
+  </div>`,
+};
diff --git a/spec/frontend/sidebar/__snapshots__/todo_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/sidebar/__snapshots__/todo_spec.js.snap
index 6640c0844e2..e295c587d70 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/sidebar/__snapshots__/todo_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/sidebar/__snapshots__/todo_spec.js.snap
@@ -4,13 +4,8 @@ exports[`SidebarTodo template renders component container element with proper da
 <button
   aria-label="Mark as done"
   class="btn btn-default btn-todo issuable-header-btn float-right"
-  data-boundary="viewport"
-  data-container="body"
   data-issuable-id="1"
   data-issuable-type="epic"
-  data-original-title=""
-  data-placement="left"
-  title=""
   type="button"
 >
   <gl-icon-stub
diff --git a/spec/frontend/sidebar/issuable_assignees_spec.js b/spec/frontend/sidebar/issuable_assignees_spec.js
index 076616de040..af4dc315aad 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/sidebar/issuable_assignees_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/sidebar/issuable_assignees_spec.js
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ describe('IssuableAssignees', () => {
       createComponent();
     });
 
-    it('renders "None"', () => {
-      expect(findEmptyAssignee().text()).toBe('None');
+    it('renders "None - assign yourself"', () => {
+      expect(findEmptyAssignee().text()).toBe('None - assign yourself');
     });
   });
 
@@ -38,4 +38,12 @@ describe('IssuableAssignees', () => {
       expect(findUncollapsedAssigneeList().exists()).toBe(true);
     });
   });
+
+  describe('when clicking "assign yourself"', () => {
+    it('emits "assign-self"', () => {
+      createComponent();
+      wrapper.find('[data-testid="assign-yourself"]').vm.$emit('click');
+      expect(wrapper.emitted('assign-self')).toHaveLength(1);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js
index 266c906ba60..f9b6ac721d2 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js
@@ -164,9 +164,7 @@ describe('MRWidgetHeader', () => {
       it('renders checkout branch button with modal trigger', () => {
         const button = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-check-out-branch');
 
-        expect(button.textContent.trim()).toEqual('Check out branch');
-        expect(button.getAttribute('data-target')).toEqual('#modal_merge_info');
-        expect(button.getAttribute('data-toggle')).toEqual('modal');
+        expect(button.textContent.trim()).toBe('Check out branch');
       });
 
       it('renders web ide button', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_conflicts_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_conflicts_spec.js
index 19f8a67d066..b8cd1469179 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_conflicts_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_conflicts_spec.js
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ describe('MRWidgetConflicts', () => {
     });
 
     it('sets resolve button as disabled', () => {
-      expect(vm.find('.js-resolve-conflicts-button').attributes('disabled')).toBe('disabled');
+      expect(vm.find('.js-resolve-conflicts-button').attributes('disabled')).toBe('true');
     });
 
     it('renders popover', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_squash_before_merge_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_squash_before_merge_spec.js
index 5326d63cb8a..f9490ac77ff 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_squash_before_merge_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/components/states/mr_widget_squash_before_merge_spec.js
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 import { createLocalVue, shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { GlFormCheckbox } from '@gitlab/ui';
 import SquashBeforeMerge from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/components/states/squash_before_merge.vue';
 import { SQUASH_BEFORE_MERGE } from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/i18n';
 
@@ -20,17 +21,15 @@ describe('Squash before merge component', () => {
     wrapper.destroy();
   });
 
-  const findLabel = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="squashLabel"]');
+  const findCheckbox = () => wrapper.find(GlFormCheckbox);
 
   describe('checkbox', () => {
-    const findCheckbox = () => wrapper.find('.js-squash-checkbox');
-
     it('is unchecked if passed value prop is false', () => {
       createComponent({
         value: false,
       });
 
-      expect(findCheckbox().element.checked).toBeFalsy();
+      expect(findCheckbox().vm.$attrs.checked).toBe(false);
     });
 
     it('is checked if passed value prop is true', () => {
@@ -38,22 +37,7 @@ describe('Squash before merge component', () => {
         value: true,
       });
 
-      expect(findCheckbox().element.checked).toBeTruthy();
-    });
-
-    it('changes value on click', done => {
-      createComponent({
-        value: false,
-      });
-
-      findCheckbox().element.checked = true;
-
-      findCheckbox().trigger('change');
-
-      wrapper.vm.$nextTick(() => {
-        expect(findCheckbox().element.checked).toBeTruthy();
-        done();
-      });
+      expect(findCheckbox().vm.$attrs.checked).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('is disabled if isDisabled prop is true', () => {
@@ -62,31 +46,12 @@ describe('Squash before merge component', () => {
         isDisabled: true,
       });
 
-      expect(findCheckbox().attributes('disabled')).toBeTruthy();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('label', () => {
-    describe.each`
-      isDisabled | expectation
-      ${true}    | ${'grays out text if it is true'}
-      ${false}   | ${'does not gray out text if it is false'}
-    `('isDisabled prop', ({ isDisabled, expectation }) => {
-      beforeEach(() => {
-        createComponent({
-          value: false,
-          isDisabled,
-        });
-      });
-
-      it(expectation, () => {
-        expect(findLabel().classes('gl-text-gray-400')).toBe(isDisabled);
-      });
+      expect(findCheckbox().vm.$attrs.disabled).toBe(true);
     });
   });
 
   describe('tooltip', () => {
-    const tooltipTitle = () => findLabel().attributes('title');
+    const tooltipTitle = () => findCheckbox().attributes('title');
 
     it('does not render when isDisabled is false', () => {
       createComponent({
@@ -114,7 +79,7 @@ describe('Squash before merge component', () => {
 
       const aboutLink = wrapper.find('a');
 
-      expect(aboutLink.exists()).toBeFalsy();
+      expect(aboutLink.exists()).toBe(false);
     });
 
     it('is rendered if  help path is passed', () => {
@@ -125,7 +90,7 @@ describe('Squash before merge component', () => {
 
       const aboutLink = wrapper.find('a');
 
-      expect(aboutLink.exists()).toBeTruthy();
+      expect(aboutLink.exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should have a correct help path if passed', () => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/deployment/deployment_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/deployment/deployment_spec.js
index 17d7fcc4bff..19a5566c3b1 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/deployment/deployment_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/deployment/deployment_spec.js
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import {
   SUCCESS,
   FAILED,
   CANCELED,
+  SKIPPED,
 } from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/components/deployment/constants';
 import { deploymentMockData, playDetails, retryDetails } from './deployment_mock_data';
 
@@ -77,6 +78,10 @@ describe('Deployment component', () => {
       ${CANCELED} | ${true}  | ${noDetails}      | ${'Canceled deployment to'}      | ${defaultGroup}
       ${CANCELED} | ${false} | ${deployDetail}   | ${'Canceled deployment to'}      | ${noActions}
       ${CANCELED} | ${false} | ${noDetails}      | ${'Canceled deployment to'}      | ${noActions}
+      ${SKIPPED}  | ${true}  | ${deployDetail}   | ${'Skipped deployment to'}       | ${defaultGroup}
+      ${SKIPPED}  | ${true}  | ${noDetails}      | ${'Skipped deployment to'}       | ${defaultGroup}
+      ${SKIPPED}  | ${false} | ${deployDetail}   | ${'Skipped deployment to'}       | ${noActions}
+      ${SKIPPED}  | ${false} | ${noDetails}      | ${'Skipped deployment to'}       | ${noActions}
     `(
       '$status + previous: $previous + manual: $deploymentDetails.isManual',
       ({ status, previous, deploymentDetails, text, actionButtons }) => {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mock_data.js
index 144283dc507..8ee920f06a1 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mock_data.js
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ export default {
   user_callouts_path: 'some/callout/path',
   suggest_pipeline_feature_id: 'suggest_pipeline',
   new_project_pipeline_path: '/group2/project2/pipelines/new',
+  source_project_default_url: '/gitlab-org/html5-boilerplate.git',
   metrics: {
     merged_by: {
       name: 'Administrator',
@@ -263,6 +264,8 @@ export default {
   merge_trains_count: 3,
   merge_train_index: 1,
   security_reports_docs_path: 'security-reports-docs-path',
+  sast_comparison_path: '/sast_comparison_path',
+  secret_scanning_comparison_path: '/secret_scanning_comparison_path',
 };
 
 export const mockStore = {
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_how_to_merge_modal_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_how_to_merge_modal_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..aaaee3327a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_how_to_merge_modal_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+import { GlModal, GlSprintf } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import MrWidgetHowToMergeModal from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/components/mr_widget_how_to_merge_modal.vue';
+
+describe('MRWidgetHowToMerge', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+
+  function mountComponent({ data = {}, props = {} } = {}) {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(MrWidgetHowToMergeModal, {
+      data() {
+        return { ...data };
+      },
+      propsData: {
+        ...props,
+      },
+      stubs: {},
+    });
+  }
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    mountComponent();
+  });
+
+  const findModal = () => wrapper.find(GlModal);
+  const findInstructionsFields = () =>
+    wrapper.findAll('[ data-testid="how-to-merge-instructions"]');
+  const findTipLink = () => wrapper.find(GlSprintf);
+
+  it('renders a modal', () => {
+    expect(findModal().exists()).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('renders a selection of markdown fields', () => {
+    expect(findInstructionsFields().length).toBe(3);
+  });
+
+  it('renders a tip including a link to docs when a valid link is present', () => {
+    mountComponent({ props: { reviewingDocsPath: '/gitlab-org/help' } });
+    expect(findTipLink().exists()).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('should not render a tip including a link to docs when a valid link is not present', () => {
+    expect(findTipLink().exists()).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it('should render different instructions based on if the user can merge', () => {
+    mountComponent({ props: { canMerge: true } });
+    expect(
+      findInstructionsFields()
+        .at(2)
+        .text(),
+    ).toContain('git push origin');
+  });
+
+  it('should render different instructions based on if the merge is based off a fork', () => {
+    mountComponent({ props: { isFork: true } });
+    expect(
+      findInstructionsFields()
+        .at(0)
+        .text(),
+    ).toContain('FETCH_HEAD');
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js
index d6f85dcfcc7..8c917e9339f 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ describe('mrWidgetOptions', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('suggestPipeline feature flag', () => {
+  describe('suggestPipeline', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       mock.onAny().reply(200);
 
@@ -860,8 +860,6 @@ describe('mrWidgetOptions', () => {
 
     describe('given feature flag is enabled', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
-        gon.features = { suggestPipeline: true };
-
         createComponent();
 
         vm.mr.hasCI = false;
@@ -891,19 +889,5 @@ describe('mrWidgetOptions', () => {
         expect(findSuggestPipeline()).toBeNull();
       });
     });
-
-    describe('given feature flag is not enabled', () => {
-      beforeEach(() => {
-        gon.features = { suggestPipeline: false };
-
-        createComponent();
-
-        vm.mr.hasCI = false;
-      });
-
-      it('should not suggest pipelines when none exist', () => {
-        expect(findSuggestPipeline()).toBeNull();
-      });
-    });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/stores/mr_widget_store_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/stores/mr_widget_store_spec.js
index f73f78d6f6e..8b2c10ec50a 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/stores/mr_widget_store_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_mr_widget/stores/mr_widget_store_spec.js
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+import { convertToCamelCase } from '~/lib/utils/text_utility';
 import MergeRequestStore from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store';
 import { stateKey } from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps';
 import mockData from '../mock_data';
@@ -141,10 +142,29 @@ describe('MergeRequestStore', () => {
       expect(store.newPipelinePath).toBe('/group2/project2/pipelines/new');
     });
 
+    it('should set sourceProjectDefaultUrl', () => {
+      store.setPaths({ ...mockData });
+
+      expect(store.sourceProjectDefaultUrl).toBe('/gitlab-org/html5-boilerplate.git');
+    });
+
     it('should set securityReportsDocsPath', () => {
       store.setPaths({ ...mockData });
 
       expect(store.securityReportsDocsPath).toBe('security-reports-docs-path');
     });
+
+    it.each(['sast_comparison_path', 'secret_scanning_comparison_path'])(
+      'should set %s path',
+      property => {
+        // Ensure something is set in the mock data
+        expect(property in mockData).toBe(true);
+        const expectedValue = mockData[property];
+
+        store.setPaths({ ...mockData });
+
+        expect(store[convertToCamelCase(property)]).toBe(expectedValue);
+      },
+    );
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/awards_list_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/awards_list_spec.js.snap
index 04ae2a0f34d..20ea897e29c 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/awards_list_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/awards_list_spec.js.snap
@@ -5,12 +5,17 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
   class="awards js-awards-block"
 >
   <button
-    class="btn award-control"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="Ada, Leonardo, and Marie"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -23,18 +28,28 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      3
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        3
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
   <button
-    class="btn award-control active"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button selected"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="You, Ada, and Marie"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -47,18 +62,28 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      3
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        3
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
   <button
-    class="btn award-control"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="Ada and Jane"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -71,18 +96,28 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      2
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        2
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
   <button
-    class="btn award-control active"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button selected"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="You, Ada, Jane, and Leonardo"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -95,18 +130,28 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      4
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        4
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
   <button
-    class="btn award-control active"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button selected"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="You"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -119,18 +164,28 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      1
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        1
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
   <button
-    class="btn award-control"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="Marie"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -143,18 +198,28 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      1
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        1
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
   <button
-    class="btn award-control active"
+    class="btn gl-mr-3 btn-default btn-md gl-button selected"
     data-testid="award-button"
     title="You"
     type="button"
   >
+    <!---->
+     
+    <!---->
+     
     <span
+      class="award-emoji-block"
       data-testid="award-html"
     >
       
@@ -167,9 +232,14 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
     </span>
      
     <span
-      class="award-control-text js-counter"
+      class="gl-button-text"
     >
-      1
+       
+      <span
+        class="js-counter"
+      >
+        1
+      </span>
     </span>
   </button>
    
@@ -178,46 +248,59 @@ exports[`vue_shared/components/awards_list default matches snapshot 1`] = `
   >
     <button
       aria-label="Add reaction"
-      class="award-control btn js-add-award js-test-add-button-class"
+      class="btn add-reaction-button js-add-award btn-default btn-md gl-button js-test-add-button-class"
       title="Add reaction"
       type="button"
     >
-      <span
-        class="award-control-icon award-control-icon-neutral"
-      >
-        <gl-icon-stub
-          aria-hidden="true"
-          name="slight-smile"
-          size="16"
-        />
-      </span>
+      <!---->
        
+      <!---->
+        
       <span
-        class="award-control-icon award-control-icon-positive"
+        class="gl-button-text"
       >
-        <gl-icon-stub
-          aria-hidden="true"
-          name="smiley"
-          size="16"
-        />
+        <span
+          class="reaction-control-icon reaction-control-icon-neutral"
+        >
+          <svg
+            aria-hidden="true"
+            class="gl-icon s16"
+            data-testid="slight-smile-icon"
+          >
+            <use
+              href="#slight-smile"
+            />
+          </svg>
+        </span>
+         
+        <span
+          class="reaction-control-icon reaction-control-icon-positive"
+        >
+          <svg
+            aria-hidden="true"
+            class="gl-icon s16"
+            data-testid="smiley-icon"
+          >
+            <use
+              href="#smiley"
+            />
+          </svg>
+        </span>
+         
+        <span
+          class="reaction-control-icon reaction-control-icon-super-positive"
+        >
+          <svg
+            aria-hidden="true"
+            class="gl-icon s16"
+            data-testid="smile-icon"
+          >
+            <use
+              href="#smile"
+            />
+          </svg>
+        </span>
       </span>
-       
-      <span
-        class="award-control-icon award-control-icon-super-positive"
-      >
-        <gl-icon-stub
-          aria-hidden="true"
-          name="smiley"
-          size="16"
-        />
-      </span>
-       
-      <gl-loading-icon-stub
-        class="award-control-icon-loading"
-        color="dark"
-        label="Loading"
-        size="md"
-      />
     </button>
   </div>
 </div>
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/expand_button_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/expand_button_spec.js.snap
index 19a649089e0..adb6c935f96 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/expand_button_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/__snapshots__/expand_button_spec.js.snap
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ exports[`Expand button on click when short text is provided renders button after
     <!---->
      
     <svg
+      aria-hidden="true"
       class="gl-button-icon gl-icon s16"
       data-testid="ellipsis_h-icon"
     >
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ exports[`Expand button on click when short text is provided renders button after
     <!---->
      
     <svg
+      aria-hidden="true"
       class="gl-button-icon gl-icon s16"
       data-testid="ellipsis_h-icon"
     >
@@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ exports[`Expand button when short text is provided renders button before text 1`
     <!---->
      
     <svg
+      aria-hidden="true"
       class="gl-button-icon gl-icon s16"
       data-testid="ellipsis_h-icon"
     >
@@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ exports[`Expand button when short text is provided renders button before text 1`
     <!---->
      
     <svg
+      aria-hidden="true"
       class="gl-button-icon gl-icon s16"
       data-testid="ellipsis_h-icon"
     >
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/awards_list_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/awards_list_spec.js
index 63fc8a5749d..d20de81c446 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/awards_list_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/awards_list_spec.js
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import AwardsList from '~/vue_shared/components/awards_list.vue';
 
 const createUser = (id, name) => ({ id, name });
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ const TEST_AWARDS = [
 ];
 const TEST_ADD_BUTTON_CLASS = 'js-test-add-button-class';
 
+const REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES = ['btn', 'gl-mr-3', 'btn-default', 'btn-md', 'gl-button'];
+
 describe('vue_shared/components/awards_list', () => {
   let wrapper;
 
@@ -54,16 +56,16 @@ describe('vue_shared/components/awards_list', () => {
       throw new Error('There should only be one wrapper created per test');
     }
 
-    wrapper = shallowMount(AwardsList, { propsData: props });
+    wrapper = mount(AwardsList, { propsData: props });
   };
   const matchingEmojiTag = name => expect.stringMatching(`gl-emoji data-name="${name}"`);
-  const findAwardButtons = () => wrapper.findAll('[data-testid="award-button"');
+  const findAwardButtons = () => wrapper.findAll('[data-testid="award-button"]');
   const findAwardsData = () =>
     findAwardButtons().wrappers.map(x => {
       return {
         classes: x.classes(),
         title: x.attributes('title'),
-        html: x.find('[data-testid="award-html"]').element.innerHTML,
+        html: x.find('[data-testid="award-html"]').html(),
         count: Number(x.find('.js-counter').text()),
       };
     });
@@ -86,43 +88,43 @@ describe('vue_shared/components/awards_list', () => {
     it('shows awards in correct order', () => {
       expect(findAwardsData()).toEqual([
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 3,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_THUMBSUP),
           title: 'Ada, Leonardo, and Marie',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control', 'active'],
+          classes: [...REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES, 'selected'],
           count: 3,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_THUMBSDOWN),
           title: 'You, Ada, and Marie',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 2,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_SMILE),
           title: 'Ada and Jane',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control', 'active'],
+          classes: [...REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES, 'selected'],
           count: 4,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_OK),
           title: 'You, Ada, Jane, and Leonardo',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control', 'active'],
+          classes: [...REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES, 'selected'],
           count: 1,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_CACTUS),
           title: 'You',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 1,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_A),
           title: 'Marie',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control', 'active'],
+          classes: [...REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES, 'selected'],
           count: 1,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_B),
           title: 'You',
@@ -135,7 +137,7 @@ describe('vue_shared/components/awards_list', () => {
 
       findAwardButtons()
         .at(2)
-        .trigger('click');
+        .vm.$emit('click');
 
       expect(wrapper.emitted().award).toEqual([[EMOJI_SMILE]]);
     });
@@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ describe('vue_shared/components/awards_list', () => {
 
       findAwardButtons()
         .at(0)
-        .trigger('click');
+        .vm.$emit('click');
 
       expect(wrapper.emitted().award).toEqual([[Number(EMOJI_100)]]);
     });
@@ -225,26 +227,26 @@ describe('vue_shared/components/awards_list', () => {
     it('shows awards in correct order', () => {
       expect(findAwardsData()).toEqual([
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 0,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_THUMBSUP),
           title: '',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 0,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_THUMBSDOWN),
           title: '',
         },
         // We expect the EMOJI_100 before the EMOJI_SMILE because it was given as a defaultAward
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 1,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_100),
           title: 'Marie',
         },
         {
-          classes: ['btn', 'award-control'],
+          classes: REACTION_CONTROL_CLASSES,
           count: 1,
           html: matchingEmojiTag(EMOJI_SMILE),
           title: 'Marie',
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/__snapshots__/utils_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/__snapshots__/utils_spec.js.snap
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d0fa2086fdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/__snapshots__/utils_spec.js.snap
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// Jest Snapshot v1, https://goo.gl/fbAQLP
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils issues config shows the iid and title in the menu item within a project context 1`] = `"<small>123456</small> Project context issue title &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils issues config shows the reference and title in the menu item within a group context 1`] = `"<small>gitlab#987654</small> Group context issue title &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils labels config shows the title in the menu item 1`] = `
+"
+        <span class=\\"dropdown-label-box\\" style=\\"background: #123456;\\"></span>
+        bug &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"
+`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils members config shows an avatar character, name, parent name, and count in the menu item for a group 1`] = `
+"
+        <div class=\\"gl-display-flex gl-align-items-center\\">
+          <div class=\\"gl-avatar gl-avatar-s24 gl-flex-shrink-0 gl-rounded-small
+        gl-display-flex gl-align-items-center gl-justify-content-center\\" aria-hidden=\\"true\\">
+            G</div>
+          <div class=\\"gl-font-sm gl-line-height-normal gl-ml-3\\">
+            <div>1-1s &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt; (2)</div>
+            <div class=\\"gl-text-gray-700\\">GitLab Support Team</div>
+          </div>
+          
+        </div>
+      "
+`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils members config shows the avatar, name and username in the menu item for a user 1`] = `
+"
+        <div class=\\"gl-display-flex gl-align-items-center\\">
+          <img class=\\"gl-avatar gl-avatar-s24 gl-flex-shrink-0 gl-avatar-circle\\" src=\\"/uploads/-/system/user/avatar/123456/avatar.png\\" alt=\\"\\" />
+          <div class=\\"gl-font-sm gl-line-height-normal gl-ml-3\\">
+            <div>My Name &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;</div>
+            <div class=\\"gl-text-gray-700\\">@myusername</div>
+          </div>
+          
+        </div>
+      "
+`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils merge requests config shows the iid and title in the menu item within a project context 1`] = `"<small>123456</small> Project context merge request title &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils merge requests config shows the reference and title in the menu item within a group context 1`] = `"<small>gitlab!456789</small> Group context merge request title &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils milestones config shows the title in the menu item 1`] = `"13.2 &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"`;
+
+exports[`gfm_autocomplete/utils snippets config shows the id and title in the menu item 1`] = `"<small>123456</small> Snippet title &lt;script&gt;alert(&#39;hi&#39;)&lt;/script&gt;"`;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gl_mentions_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/gfm_autocomplete_spec.js
index 32fc055a77d..d12faacca75 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gl_mentions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/gfm_autocomplete_spec.js
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
 import Tribute from 'tributejs';
-import GlMentions from '~/vue_shared/components/gl_mentions.vue';
+import GfmAutocomplete from '~/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/gfm_autocomplete.vue';
 
-describe('GlMentions', () => {
+describe('GfmAutocomplete', () => {
   let wrapper;
 
-  describe('Tribute', () => {
+  describe('tribute', () => {
     const mentions = '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/autocomplete_sources/members?type=Issue&type_id=1';
 
     beforeEach(() => {
-      wrapper = shallowMount(GlMentions, {
+      wrapper = shallowMount(GfmAutocomplete, {
         propsData: {
           dataSources: {
             mentions,
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/utils_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/utils_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..647f8c6e000
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/utils_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+import { escape, last } from 'lodash';
+import { GfmAutocompleteType, tributeConfig } from '~/vue_shared/components/gfm_autocomplete/utils';
+
+describe('gfm_autocomplete/utils', () => {
+  describe('issues config', () => {
+    const issuesConfig = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Issues].config;
+    const groupContextIssue = {
+      iid: 987654,
+      reference: 'gitlab#987654',
+      title: "Group context issue title <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+    };
+    const projectContextIssue = {
+      id: null,
+      iid: 123456,
+      time_estimate: 0,
+      title: "Project context issue title <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+    };
+
+    it('uses # as the trigger', () => {
+      expect(issuesConfig.trigger).toBe('#');
+    });
+
+    it('searches using both the iid and title', () => {
+      expect(issuesConfig.lookup(projectContextIssue)).toBe(
+        `${projectContextIssue.iid}${projectContextIssue.title}`,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('shows the reference and title in the menu item within a group context', () => {
+      expect(issuesConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: groupContextIssue })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('shows the iid and title in the menu item within a project context', () => {
+      expect(issuesConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: projectContextIssue })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the reference on autocomplete selection within a group context', () => {
+      expect(issuesConfig.selectTemplate({ original: groupContextIssue })).toBe(
+        groupContextIssue.reference,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the iid on autocomplete selection within a project context', () => {
+      expect(issuesConfig.selectTemplate({ original: projectContextIssue })).toBe(
+        `#${projectContextIssue.iid}`,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('labels config', () => {
+    const labelsConfig = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Labels].config;
+    const labelsFilter = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Labels].filterValues;
+    const label = {
+      color: '#123456',
+      textColor: '#FFFFFF',
+      title: `bug <script>alert('hi')</script>`,
+      type: 'GroupLabel',
+    };
+    const singleWordLabel = {
+      color: '#456789',
+      textColor: '#DDD',
+      title: `bug`,
+      type: 'GroupLabel',
+    };
+    const numericalLabel = {
+      color: '#abcdef',
+      textColor: '#AAA',
+      title: 123456,
+      type: 'ProjectLabel',
+    };
+
+    it('uses ~ as the trigger', () => {
+      expect(labelsConfig.trigger).toBe('~');
+    });
+
+    it('searches using `title`', () => {
+      expect(labelsConfig.lookup).toBe('title');
+    });
+
+    it('shows the title in the menu item', () => {
+      expect(labelsConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: label })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the title on autocomplete selection', () => {
+      expect(labelsConfig.selectTemplate({ original: singleWordLabel })).toBe(
+        `~${escape(singleWordLabel.title)}`,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the title enclosed with quotes on autocomplete selection when the title is numerical', () => {
+      expect(labelsConfig.selectTemplate({ original: numericalLabel })).toBe(
+        `~"${escape(numericalLabel.title)}"`,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the title enclosed with quotes on autocomplete selection when the title contains multiple words', () => {
+      expect(labelsConfig.selectTemplate({ original: label })).toBe(`~"${escape(label.title)}"`);
+    });
+
+    describe('filter', () => {
+      const collection = [label, singleWordLabel, { ...numericalLabel, set: true }];
+
+      describe('/label quick action', () => {
+        describe('when the line starts with `/label`', () => {
+          it('shows labels that are not currently selected', () => {
+            const fullText = '/label ~';
+            const selectionStart = 8;
+
+            expect(labelsFilter({ collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual([
+              collection[0],
+              collection[1],
+            ]);
+          });
+        });
+
+        describe('when the line does not start with `/label`', () => {
+          it('shows all labels', () => {
+            const fullText = '~';
+            const selectionStart = 1;
+
+            expect(labelsFilter({ collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual(collection);
+          });
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('/unlabel quick action', () => {
+        describe('when the line starts with `/unlabel`', () => {
+          it('shows labels that are currently selected', () => {
+            const fullText = '/unlabel ~';
+            const selectionStart = 10;
+
+            expect(labelsFilter({ collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual([collection[2]]);
+          });
+        });
+
+        describe('when the line does not start with `/unlabel`', () => {
+          it('shows all labels', () => {
+            const fullText = '~';
+            const selectionStart = 1;
+
+            expect(labelsFilter({ collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual(collection);
+          });
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('members config', () => {
+    const membersConfig = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Members].config;
+    const membersFilter = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Members].filterValues;
+    const userMember = {
+      type: 'User',
+      username: 'myusername',
+      name: "My Name <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+      avatar_url: '/uploads/-/system/user/avatar/123456/avatar.png',
+      availability: null,
+    };
+    const groupMember = {
+      type: 'Group',
+      username: 'gitlab-com/support/1-1s',
+      name: "GitLab.com / GitLab Support Team / 1-1s <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+      avatar_url: null,
+      count: 2,
+      mentionsDisabled: null,
+    };
+
+    it('uses @ as the trigger', () => {
+      expect(membersConfig.trigger).toBe('@');
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the username on autocomplete selection', () => {
+      expect(membersConfig.fillAttr).toBe('username');
+    });
+
+    it('searches using both the name and username for a user', () => {
+      expect(membersConfig.lookup(userMember)).toBe(`${userMember.name}${userMember.username}`);
+    });
+
+    it('searches using only its own name and not its ancestors for a group', () => {
+      expect(membersConfig.lookup(groupMember)).toBe(last(groupMember.name.split(' / ')));
+    });
+
+    it('shows the avatar, name and username in the menu item for a user', () => {
+      expect(membersConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: userMember })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('shows an avatar character, name, parent name, and count in the menu item for a group', () => {
+      expect(membersConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: groupMember })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    describe('filter', () => {
+      const assignees = [userMember.username];
+      const collection = [userMember, groupMember];
+
+      describe('/assign quick action', () => {
+        describe('when the line starts with `/assign`', () => {
+          it('shows members that are not currently selected', () => {
+            const fullText = '/assign @';
+            const selectionStart = 9;
+
+            expect(membersFilter({ assignees, collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual([
+              collection[1],
+            ]);
+          });
+        });
+
+        describe('when the line does not start with `/assign`', () => {
+          it('shows all labels', () => {
+            const fullText = '@';
+            const selectionStart = 1;
+
+            expect(membersFilter({ assignees, collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual(
+              collection,
+            );
+          });
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('/unassign quick action', () => {
+        describe('when the line starts with `/unassign`', () => {
+          it('shows members that are currently selected', () => {
+            const fullText = '/unassign @';
+            const selectionStart = 11;
+
+            expect(membersFilter({ assignees, collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual([
+              collection[0],
+            ]);
+          });
+        });
+
+        describe('when the line does not start with `/unassign`', () => {
+          it('shows all members', () => {
+            const fullText = '@';
+            const selectionStart = 1;
+
+            expect(membersFilter({ assignees, collection, fullText, selectionStart })).toEqual(
+              collection,
+            );
+          });
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('merge requests config', () => {
+    const mergeRequestsConfig = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.MergeRequests].config;
+    const groupContextMergeRequest = {
+      iid: 456789,
+      reference: 'gitlab!456789',
+      title: "Group context merge request title <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+    };
+    const projectContextMergeRequest = {
+      id: null,
+      iid: 123456,
+      time_estimate: 0,
+      title: "Project context merge request title <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+    };
+
+    it('uses ! as the trigger', () => {
+      expect(mergeRequestsConfig.trigger).toBe('!');
+    });
+
+    it('searches using both the iid and title', () => {
+      expect(mergeRequestsConfig.lookup(projectContextMergeRequest)).toBe(
+        `${projectContextMergeRequest.iid}${projectContextMergeRequest.title}`,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('shows the reference and title in the menu item within a group context', () => {
+      expect(
+        mergeRequestsConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: groupContextMergeRequest }),
+      ).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('shows the iid and title in the menu item within a project context', () => {
+      expect(
+        mergeRequestsConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: projectContextMergeRequest }),
+      ).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the reference on autocomplete selection within a group context', () => {
+      expect(mergeRequestsConfig.selectTemplate({ original: groupContextMergeRequest })).toBe(
+        groupContextMergeRequest.reference,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the iid on autocomplete selection within a project context', () => {
+      expect(mergeRequestsConfig.selectTemplate({ original: projectContextMergeRequest })).toBe(
+        `!${projectContextMergeRequest.iid}`,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('milestones config', () => {
+    const milestonesConfig = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Milestones].config;
+    const milestone = {
+      id: null,
+      iid: 49,
+      title: "13.2 <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+    };
+
+    it('uses % as the trigger', () => {
+      expect(milestonesConfig.trigger).toBe('%');
+    });
+
+    it('searches using the title', () => {
+      expect(milestonesConfig.lookup).toBe('title');
+    });
+
+    it('shows the title in the menu item', () => {
+      expect(milestonesConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: milestone })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the title on autocomplete selection', () => {
+      expect(milestonesConfig.selectTemplate({ original: milestone })).toBe(
+        `%"${escape(milestone.title)}"`,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('snippets config', () => {
+    const snippetsConfig = tributeConfig[GfmAutocompleteType.Snippets].config;
+    const snippet = {
+      id: 123456,
+      title: "Snippet title <script>alert('hi')</script>",
+    };
+
+    it('uses $ as the trigger', () => {
+      expect(snippetsConfig.trigger).toBe('$');
+    });
+
+    it('inserts the id on autocomplete selection', () => {
+      expect(snippetsConfig.fillAttr).toBe('id');
+    });
+
+    it('searches using both the id and title', () => {
+      expect(snippetsConfig.lookup(snippet)).toBe(`${snippet.id}${snippet.title}`);
+    });
+
+    it('shows the id and title in the menu item', () => {
+      expect(snippetsConfig.menuItemTemplate({ original: snippet })).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/registry/__snapshots__/code_instruction_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/registry/__snapshots__/code_instruction_spec.js.snap
index ecea151fc8a..da49778f216 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/registry/__snapshots__/code_instruction_spec.js.snap
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/registry/__snapshots__/code_instruction_spec.js.snap
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ exports[`Package code instruction single line to match the default snapshot 1`]
         <!---->
          
         <svg
+          aria-hidden="true"
           class="gl-button-icon gl-icon s16"
           data-testid="copy-to-clipboard-icon"
         >
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/security_reports/__snapshots__/security_summary_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/security_reports/__snapshots__/security_summary_spec.js.snap
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0336f4c0325
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/security_reports/__snapshots__/security_summary_spec.js.snap
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+// Jest Snapshot v1, https://goo.gl/fbAQLP
+
+exports[`Severity Summary given the message {"countMessage": "%{criticalStart}0 Critical%{criticalEnd} %{highStart}1 High%{highEnd} and %{otherStart}0 Others%{otherEnd}", "critical": 0, "high": 1, "message": "Security scanning detected %{totalStart}1%{totalEnd} potential vulnerability", "other": 0, "status": "", "total": 1} interpolates correctly 1`] = `
+<span>
+  Security scanning detected 
+  <strong>
+    1
+  </strong>
+   potential vulnerability 
+  <span
+    class="gl-font-sm"
+  >
+    <span>
+      <span
+        class="gl-pl-4"
+      >
+        
+            0 Critical
+          
+      </span>
+    </span>
+     
+    <span>
+      <strong
+        class="text-danger-600 gl-px-2"
+      >
+        
+            1 High
+          
+      </strong>
+    </span>
+     and 
+    <span>
+      <span
+        class="gl-px-2"
+      >
+        
+            0 Others
+          
+      </span>
+    </span>
+  </span>
+</span>
+`;
+
+exports[`Severity Summary given the message {"countMessage": "%{criticalStart}1 Critical%{criticalEnd} %{highStart}0 High%{highEnd} and %{otherStart}0 Others%{otherEnd}", "critical": 1, "high": 0, "message": "Security scanning detected %{totalStart}1%{totalEnd} potential vulnerability", "other": 0, "status": "", "total": 1} interpolates correctly 1`] = `
+<span>
+  Security scanning detected 
+  <strong>
+    1
+  </strong>
+   potential vulnerability 
+  <span
+    class="gl-font-sm"
+  >
+    <span>
+      <strong
+        class="text-danger-800 gl-pl-4"
+      >
+        
+            1 Critical
+          
+      </strong>
+    </span>
+     
+    <span>
+      <span
+        class="gl-px-2"
+      >
+        
+            0 High
+          
+      </span>
+    </span>
+     and 
+    <span>
+      <span
+        class="gl-px-2"
+      >
+        
+            0 Others
+          
+      </span>
+    </span>
+  </span>
+</span>
+`;
+
+exports[`Severity Summary given the message {"countMessage": "%{criticalStart}1 Critical%{criticalEnd} %{highStart}2 High%{highEnd} and %{otherStart}0 Others%{otherEnd}", "critical": 1, "high": 2, "message": "Security scanning detected %{totalStart}3%{totalEnd} potential vulnerabilities", "other": 0, "status": "", "total": 3} interpolates correctly 1`] = `
+<span>
+  Security scanning detected 
+  <strong>
+    3
+  </strong>
+   potential vulnerabilities 
+  <span
+    class="gl-font-sm"
+  >
+    <span>
+      <strong
+        class="text-danger-800 gl-pl-4"
+      >
+        
+            1 Critical
+          
+      </strong>
+    </span>
+     
+    <span>
+      <strong
+        class="text-danger-600 gl-px-2"
+      >
+        
+            2 High
+          
+      </strong>
+    </span>
+     and 
+    <span>
+      <span
+        class="gl-px-2"
+      >
+        
+            0 Others
+          
+      </span>
+    </span>
+  </span>
+</span>
+`;
+
+exports[`Severity Summary given the message {"message": ""} interpolates correctly 1`] = `
+<span>
+   
+  <!---->
+</span>
+`;
+
+exports[`Severity Summary given the message {"message": "foo"} interpolates correctly 1`] = `
+<span>
+  foo 
+  <!---->
+</span>
+`;
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/security_reports/security_summary_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/security_reports/security_summary_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4217fef9fbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/security_reports/security_summary_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+import { GlSprintf } from '@gitlab/ui';
+import { shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import SecuritySummary from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/components/security_summary.vue';
+import { groupedTextBuilder } from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/store/utils';
+
+describe('Severity Summary', () => {
+  let wrapper;
+
+  const createWrapper = message => {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(SecuritySummary, {
+      propsData: { message },
+      stubs: {
+        GlSprintf,
+      },
+    });
+  };
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    wrapper.destroy();
+    wrapper = null;
+  });
+
+  describe.each([
+    { message: '' },
+    { message: 'foo' },
+    groupedTextBuilder({ reportType: 'Security scanning', critical: 1, high: 0, total: 1 }),
+    groupedTextBuilder({ reportType: 'Security scanning', critical: 0, high: 1, total: 1 }),
+    groupedTextBuilder({ reportType: 'Security scanning', critical: 1, high: 2, total: 3 }),
+  ])('given the message %p', message => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      createWrapper(message);
+    });
+
+    it('interpolates correctly', () => {
+      expect(wrapper.element).toMatchSnapshot();
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/sidebar/labels_select_vue/labels_select_root_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/sidebar/labels_select_vue/labels_select_root_spec.js
index 8c17a974b39..1206450bbeb 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/sidebar/labels_select_vue/labels_select_root_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/sidebar/labels_select_vue/labels_select_root_spec.js
@@ -20,22 +20,24 @@ jest.mock('~/lib/utils/common_utils', () => ({
 const localVue = createLocalVue();
 localVue.use(Vuex);
 
-const createComponent = (config = mockConfig, slots = {}) =>
-  shallowMount(LabelsSelectRoot, {
-    localVue,
-    slots,
-    store: new Vuex.Store(labelsSelectModule()),
-    propsData: config,
-    stubs: {
-      'dropdown-contents': DropdownContents,
-    },
-  });
-
 describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
   let wrapper;
+  let store;
+
+  const createComponent = (config = mockConfig, slots = {}) => {
+    wrapper = shallowMount(LabelsSelectRoot, {
+      localVue,
+      slots,
+      store,
+      propsData: config,
+      stubs: {
+        'dropdown-contents': DropdownContents,
+      },
+    });
+  };
 
   beforeEach(() => {
-    wrapper = createComponent();
+    store = new Vuex.Store(labelsSelectModule());
   });
 
   afterEach(() => {
@@ -45,6 +47,7 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
   describe('methods', () => {
     describe('handleVuexActionDispatch', () => {
       it('calls `handleDropdownClose` when params `action.type` is `toggleDropdownContents` and state has `showDropdownButton` & `showDropdownContents` props `false`', () => {
+        createComponent();
         jest.spyOn(wrapper.vm, 'handleDropdownClose').mockImplementation();
 
         wrapper.vm.handleVuexActionDispatch(
@@ -67,7 +70,7 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
       });
 
       it('calls `handleDropdownClose` with state.labels filterd using `set` prop when dropdown variant is `embedded`', () => {
-        wrapper = createComponent({
+        createComponent({
           ...mockConfig,
           variant: 'embedded',
         });
@@ -95,6 +98,10 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
     });
 
     describe('handleDropdownClose', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        createComponent();
+      });
+
       it('emits `updateSelectedLabels` & `onDropdownClose` events on component when provided `labels` param is not empty', () => {
         wrapper.vm.handleDropdownClose([{ id: 1 }, { id: 2 }]);
 
@@ -112,6 +119,7 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
 
     describe('handleCollapsedValueClick', () => {
       it('emits `toggleCollapse` event on component', () => {
+        createComponent();
         wrapper.vm.handleCollapsedValueClick();
 
         expect(wrapper.emitted().toggleCollapse).toBeTruthy();
@@ -121,6 +129,7 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
 
   describe('template', () => {
     it('renders component with classes `labels-select-wrapper position-relative`', () => {
+      createComponent();
       expect(wrapper.attributes('class')).toContain('labels-select-wrapper position-relative');
     });
 
@@ -131,7 +140,7 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
     `(
       'renders component root element with CSS class `$cssClass` when `state.variant` is "$variant"',
       ({ variant, cssClass }) => {
-        wrapper = createComponent({
+        createComponent({
           ...mockConfig,
           variant,
         });
@@ -142,57 +151,58 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
       },
     );
 
-    it('renders `dropdown-value-collapsed` component when `allowLabelCreate` prop is `true`', () => {
+    it('renders `dropdown-value-collapsed` component when `allowLabelCreate` prop is `true`', async () => {
+      createComponent();
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick;
       expect(wrapper.find(DropdownValueCollapsed).exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
-    it('renders `dropdown-title` component', () => {
+    it('renders `dropdown-title` component', async () => {
+      createComponent();
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick;
       expect(wrapper.find(DropdownTitle).exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
-    it('renders `dropdown-value` component', () => {
-      const wrapperDropdownValue = createComponent(mockConfig, {
+    it('renders `dropdown-value` component', async () => {
+      createComponent(mockConfig, {
         default: 'None',
       });
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick;
 
-      return wrapperDropdownValue.vm.$nextTick(() => {
-        const valueComp = wrapperDropdownValue.find(DropdownValue);
+      const valueComp = wrapper.find(DropdownValue);
 
-        expect(valueComp.exists()).toBe(true);
-        expect(valueComp.text()).toBe('None');
-
-        wrapperDropdownValue.destroy();
-      });
+      expect(valueComp.exists()).toBe(true);
+      expect(valueComp.text()).toBe('None');
     });
 
-    it('renders `dropdown-button` component when `showDropdownButton` prop is `true`', () => {
+    it('renders `dropdown-button` component when `showDropdownButton` prop is `true`', async () => {
+      createComponent();
       wrapper.vm.$store.dispatch('toggleDropdownButton');
-
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick;
       expect(wrapper.find(DropdownButton).exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
-    it('renders `dropdown-contents` component when `showDropdownButton` & `showDropdownContents` prop is `true`', () => {
+    it('renders `dropdown-contents` component when `showDropdownButton` & `showDropdownContents` prop is `true`', async () => {
+      createComponent();
       wrapper.vm.$store.dispatch('toggleDropdownContents');
-
-      return wrapper.vm.$nextTick(() => {
-        expect(wrapper.find(DropdownContents).exists()).toBe(true);
-      });
+      await wrapper.vm.$nextTick;
+      expect(wrapper.find(DropdownContents).exists()).toBe(true);
     });
 
     describe('sets content direction based on viewport', () => {
-      it('does not set direction when `state.variant` is not "embedded"', () => {
-        wrapper.vm.$store.dispatch('toggleDropdownContents');
+      it('does not set direction when `state.variant` is not "embedded"', async () => {
+        createComponent();
 
+        wrapper.vm.$store.dispatch('toggleDropdownContents');
         wrapper.vm.setContentIsOnViewport(wrapper.vm.$store.state);
+        await wrapper.vm.$nextTick;
 
-        return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
-          expect(wrapper.find(DropdownContents).props('renderOnTop')).toBe(false);
-        });
+        expect(wrapper.find(DropdownContents).props('renderOnTop')).toBe(false);
       });
 
       describe('when `state.variant` is "embedded"', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
-          wrapper = createComponent({ ...mockConfig, variant: 'embedded' });
+          createComponent({ ...mockConfig, variant: 'embedded' });
           wrapper.vm.$store.dispatch('toggleDropdownContents');
         });
 
@@ -216,4 +226,22 @@ describe('LabelsSelectRoot', () => {
       });
     });
   });
+
+  it('calls toggleDropdownContents action when isEditing prop is changing to true', async () => {
+    createComponent();
+
+    jest.spyOn(store, 'dispatch').mockResolvedValue();
+    await wrapper.setProps({ isEditing: true });
+
+    expect(store.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('toggleDropdownContents');
+  });
+
+  it('does not call toggleDropdownContents action when isEditing prop is changing to false', async () => {
+    createComponent();
+
+    jest.spyOn(store, 'dispatch').mockResolvedValue();
+    await wrapper.setProps({ isEditing: false });
+
+    expect(store.dispatch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/tooltip_on_truncate_browser_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/tooltip_on_truncate_spec.js
index da964a2d5b9..175abf5aae0 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/tooltip_on_truncate_browser_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/components/tooltip_on_truncate_spec.js
@@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
-// this file can't be migrated to jest because it relies on the browser to perform integration tests:
-// (specifically testing around css properties `overflow` and `white-space`)
-// see: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/895#what-if-theres-a-karma-spec-which-is-simply-unmovable-to-jest-ie-it-is-dependent-on-a-running-browser-environment
-
 import { mount, shallowMount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { hasHorizontalOverflow } from '~/lib/utils/dom_utils';
 import TooltipOnTruncate from '~/vue_shared/components/tooltip_on_truncate.vue';
 
-const TEXT_SHORT = 'lorem';
-const TEXT_LONG = 'lorem-ipsum-dolar-sit-amit-consectur-adipiscing-elit-sed-do';
+const DUMMY_TEXT = 'lorem-ipsum-dolar-sit-amit-consectur-adipiscing-elit-sed-do';
 
-const TEXT_TRUNCATE = 'white-space: nowrap; overflow:hidden;';
-const STYLE_NORMAL = `${TEXT_TRUNCATE} display: inline-block; max-width: 1000px;`; // does not overflows
-const STYLE_OVERFLOWED = `${TEXT_TRUNCATE} display: inline-block; max-width: 50px;`; // overflowed when text is long
+const createChildElement = () => `<a href="#">${DUMMY_TEXT}</a>`;
 
-const createElementWithStyle = (style, content) => `<a href="#" style="${style}">${content}</a>`;
+jest.mock('~/lib/utils/dom_utils', () => ({
+  hasHorizontalOverflow: jest.fn(() => {
+    throw new Error('this needs to be mocked');
+  }),
+}));
 
 describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
   let wrapper;
@@ -24,9 +22,6 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
       propsData: {
         ...propsData,
       },
-      attrs: {
-        style: STYLE_OVERFLOWED,
-      },
       ...options,
     });
   };
@@ -39,7 +34,7 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
           title: { default: '' },
         },
         template: `
-        <TooltipOnTruncate :title="title" truncate-target="child" style="${STYLE_OVERFLOWED}">
+        <TooltipOnTruncate :title="title" truncate-target="child">
           <div>{{title}}</div>
         </TooltipOnTruncate>
         `,
@@ -65,33 +60,37 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
 
   describe('with default target', () => {
     it('renders tooltip if truncated', () => {
+      hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(true);
       createComponent({
         propsData: {
-          title: TEXT_LONG,
+          title: DUMMY_TEXT,
         },
         slots: {
-          default: [TEXT_LONG],
+          default: [DUMMY_TEXT],
         },
       });
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
+        expect(hasHorizontalOverflow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(wrapper.element);
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(true);
-        expect(wrapper.attributes('data-original-title')).toEqual(TEXT_LONG);
+        expect(wrapper.attributes('data-original-title')).toEqual(DUMMY_TEXT);
         expect(wrapper.attributes('data-placement')).toEqual('top');
       });
     });
 
     it('does not render tooltip if normal', () => {
+      hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(false);
       createComponent({
         propsData: {
-          title: TEXT_SHORT,
+          title: DUMMY_TEXT,
         },
         slots: {
-          default: [TEXT_SHORT],
+          default: [DUMMY_TEXT],
         },
       });
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
+        expect(hasHorizontalOverflow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(wrapper.element);
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(false);
       });
     });
@@ -99,35 +98,36 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
 
   describe('with child target', () => {
     it('renders tooltip if truncated', () => {
+      hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(true);
       createComponent({
-        attrs: {
-          style: STYLE_NORMAL,
-        },
         propsData: {
-          title: TEXT_LONG,
+          title: DUMMY_TEXT,
           truncateTarget: 'child',
         },
         slots: {
-          default: createElementWithStyle(STYLE_OVERFLOWED, TEXT_LONG),
+          default: createChildElement(),
         },
       });
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
+        expect(hasHorizontalOverflow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(wrapper.element.childNodes[0]);
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(true);
       });
     });
 
     it('does not render tooltip if normal', () => {
+      hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(false);
       createComponent({
         propsData: {
           truncateTarget: 'child',
         },
         slots: {
-          default: createElementWithStyle(STYLE_NORMAL, TEXT_LONG),
+          default: createChildElement(),
         },
       });
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
+        expect(hasHorizontalOverflow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(wrapper.element.childNodes[0]);
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(false);
       });
     });
@@ -135,23 +135,19 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
 
   describe('with fn target', () => {
     it('renders tooltip if truncated', () => {
+      hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(true);
       createComponent({
-        attrs: {
-          style: STYLE_NORMAL,
-        },
         propsData: {
-          title: TEXT_LONG,
+          title: DUMMY_TEXT,
           truncateTarget: el => el.childNodes[1],
         },
         slots: {
-          default: [
-            createElementWithStyle('', TEXT_LONG),
-            createElementWithStyle(STYLE_OVERFLOWED, TEXT_LONG),
-          ],
+          default: [createChildElement(), createChildElement()],
         },
       });
 
       return wrapper.vm.$nextTick().then(() => {
+        expect(hasHorizontalOverflow).toHaveBeenCalledWith(wrapper.element.childNodes[1]);
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(true);
       });
     });
@@ -161,15 +157,13 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
     it('sets data-placement when tooltip is rendered', () => {
       const placement = 'bottom';
 
+      hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(true);
       createComponent({
         propsData: {
           placement,
         },
-        attrs: {
-          style: STYLE_OVERFLOWED,
-        },
         slots: {
-          default: TEXT_LONG,
+          default: DUMMY_TEXT,
         },
       });
 
@@ -183,21 +177,23 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
   describe('updates when title and slot content changes', () => {
     describe('is initialized with a long text', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
+        hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(true);
         createWrappedComponent({
-          propsData: { title: TEXT_LONG },
+          propsData: { title: DUMMY_TEXT },
         });
         return parent.vm.$nextTick();
       });
 
       it('renders tooltip', () => {
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(true);
-        expect(wrapper.attributes('data-original-title')).toEqual(TEXT_LONG);
+        expect(wrapper.attributes('data-original-title')).toEqual(DUMMY_TEXT);
         expect(wrapper.attributes('data-placement')).toEqual('top');
       });
 
       it('does not render tooltip after updated to a short text', () => {
+        hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(false);
         parent.setProps({
-          title: TEXT_SHORT,
+          title: 'new-text',
         });
 
         return wrapper.vm
@@ -211,8 +207,9 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
 
     describe('is initialized with a short text', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
+        hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(false);
         createWrappedComponent({
-          propsData: { title: TEXT_SHORT },
+          propsData: { title: DUMMY_TEXT },
         });
         return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
       });
@@ -221,9 +218,11 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
         expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(false);
       });
 
-      it('renders tooltip after updated to a long text', () => {
+      it('renders tooltip after text is updated', () => {
+        hasHorizontalOverflow.mockReturnValueOnce(true);
+        const newText = 'new-text';
         parent.setProps({
-          title: TEXT_LONG,
+          title: newText,
         });
 
         return wrapper.vm
@@ -231,7 +230,7 @@ describe('TooltipOnTruncate component', () => {
           .then(() => wrapper.vm.$nextTick()) // wait 2 times to get an updated slot
           .then(() => {
             expect(hasTooltip()).toBe(true);
-            expect(wrapper.attributes('data-original-title')).toEqual(TEXT_LONG);
+            expect(wrapper.attributes('data-original-title')).toEqual(newText);
             expect(wrapper.attributes('data-placement')).toEqual('top');
           });
       });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/mock_data.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9061d4586c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/mock_data.js
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+export const mockFindings = [
+  {
+    id: null,
+    report_type: 'dependency_scanning',
+    name: 'Cross-site Scripting in serialize-javascript',
+    severity: 'critical',
+    scanner: {
+      external_id: 'gemnasium',
+      name: 'Gemnasium',
+      version: '1.1.1',
+      url: 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/gemnasium',
+    },
+    identifiers: [
+      {
+        external_type: 'gemnasium',
+        external_id: '58caa017-9a9a-46d6-bab2-ec930f46833c',
+        name: 'Gemnasium-58caa017-9a9a-46d6-bab2-ec930f46833c',
+        url:
+          'https://deps.sec.gitlab.com/packages/npm/serialize-javascript/versions/1.7.0/advisories',
+      },
+      {
+        external_type: 'cve',
+        external_id: 'CVE-2019-16769',
+        name: 'CVE-2019-16769',
+        url: 'https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-16769',
+      },
+    ],
+    project_fingerprint: '09df9f4d11c8deb93d81bdcc39f7667b44143298',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_issue_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_merge_request_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    project: {
+      id: 7071551,
+      name: 'gitlab-ui',
+      full_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui',
+      full_name: 'GitLab.org / gitlab-ui',
+    },
+    dismissal_feedback: null,
+    issue_feedback: null,
+    merge_request_feedback: null,
+    description:
+      'The serialize-javascript npm package is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS). It does not properly mitigate against unsafe characters in serialized regular expressions. If serialized data of regular expression objects are used in an environment other than Node.js, it is affected by this vulnerability.',
+    links: [{ url: 'https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16769' }],
+    location: {
+      file: 'yarn.lock',
+      dependency: { package: { name: 'serialize-javascript' }, version: '1.7.0' },
+    },
+    remediations: [null],
+    solution: 'Upgrade to version 2.1.1 or above.',
+    state: 'opened',
+    blob_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/blob/ad137f0a8ac59af961afe47d04e5cc062c6864a9/yarn.lock',
+    evidence: 'Credit Card Detected: Diners Card',
+  },
+  {
+    id: null,
+    report_type: 'dependency_scanning',
+    name: '3rd party CORS request may execute in jquery',
+    severity: 'high',
+    scanner: { external_id: 'retire.js', name: 'Retire.js' },
+    identifiers: [
+      {
+        external_type: 'cve',
+        external_id: 'CVE-2015-9251',
+        name: 'CVE-2015-9251',
+        url: 'https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-9251',
+      },
+    ],
+    project_fingerprint: '1ecd3b214cf39c0b9ad23a0a9679778d7cf55876',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_issue_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_merge_request_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    project: {
+      id: 7071551,
+      name: 'gitlab-ui',
+      full_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui',
+      full_name: 'GitLab.org / gitlab-ui',
+    },
+    dismissal_feedback: {
+      id: 2528,
+      created_at: '2019-08-26T12:30:32.349Z',
+      project_id: 7071551,
+      author: {
+        id: 181229,
+        name: "Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert",
+        username: 'leipert',
+        state: 'active',
+        avatar_url:
+          'https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/19a1f1260fa70323f35bc508927921a2?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+        web_url: 'https://gitlab.com/leipert',
+        status_tooltip_html: null,
+        path: '/leipert',
+      },
+      comment_details: {
+        comment: 'This particular jQuery version appears in a test path of tinycolor2.\n',
+        comment_timestamp: '2019-08-26T12:30:37.610Z',
+        comment_author: {
+          id: 181229,
+          name: "Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert",
+          username: 'leipert',
+          state: 'active',
+          avatar_url:
+            'https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/19a1f1260fa70323f35bc508927921a2?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+          web_url: 'https://gitlab.com/leipert',
+          status_tooltip_html: null,
+          path: '/leipert',
+        },
+      },
+      pipeline: { id: 78375355, path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/pipelines/78375355' },
+      destroy_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path:
+        '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback/2528',
+      category: 'dependency_scanning',
+      feedback_type: 'dismissal',
+      branch: 'leipert-dogfood-secure',
+      project_fingerprint: '1ecd3b214cf39c0b9ad23a0a9679778d7cf55876',
+    },
+    issue_feedback: null,
+    merge_request_feedback: null,
+    description: null,
+    links: [
+      { url: 'https://github.com/jquery/jquery/issues/2432' },
+      { url: 'http://blog.jquery.com/2016/01/08/jquery-2-2-and-1-12-released/' },
+      { url: 'https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-9251' },
+      { url: 'http://research.insecurelabs.org/jquery/test/' },
+    ],
+    location: {
+      file: 'node_modules/tinycolor2/demo/jquery-1.9.1.js',
+      dependency: { package: { name: 'jquery' }, version: '1.9.1' },
+    },
+    remediations: [null],
+    solution: null,
+    state: 'dismissed',
+    blob_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/blob/ad137f0a8ac59af961afe47d04e5cc062c6864a9/node_modules/tinycolor2/demo/jquery-1.9.1.js',
+  },
+  {
+    id: null,
+    report_type: 'dependency_scanning',
+    name:
+      'jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution in jquery',
+    severity: 'low',
+    scanner: { external_id: 'retire.js', name: 'Retire.js' },
+    identifiers: [
+      {
+        external_type: 'cve',
+        external_id: 'CVE-2019-11358',
+        name: 'CVE-2019-11358',
+        url: 'https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-11358',
+      },
+    ],
+    project_fingerprint: 'aeb4b2442d92d0ccf7023f0c220bda8b4ba910e3',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_issue_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_merge_request_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    project: {
+      id: 7071551,
+      name: 'gitlab-ui',
+      full_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui',
+      full_name: 'GitLab.org / gitlab-ui',
+    },
+    dismissal_feedback: {
+      id: 4197,
+      created_at: '2019-11-14T11:03:18.472Z',
+      project_id: 7071551,
+      author: {
+        id: 181229,
+        name: "Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert",
+        username: 'leipert',
+        state: 'active',
+        avatar_url:
+          'https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/19a1f1260fa70323f35bc508927921a2?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+        web_url: 'https://gitlab.com/leipert',
+        status_tooltip_html: null,
+        path: '/leipert',
+      },
+      comment_details: {
+        comment:
+          'This is a false positive, as it just part of some documentation assets of sass-true.',
+        comment_timestamp: '2019-11-14T11:03:18.464Z',
+        comment_author: {
+          id: 181229,
+          name: "Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert",
+          username: 'leipert',
+          state: 'active',
+          avatar_url:
+            'https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/19a1f1260fa70323f35bc508927921a2?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+          web_url: 'https://gitlab.com/leipert',
+          status_tooltip_html: null,
+          path: '/leipert',
+        },
+      },
+      destroy_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path:
+        '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback/4197',
+      category: 'dependency_scanning',
+      feedback_type: 'dismissal',
+      branch: null,
+      project_fingerprint: 'aeb4b2442d92d0ccf7023f0c220bda8b4ba910e3',
+    },
+    issue_feedback: null,
+    merge_request_feedback: null,
+    description: null,
+    links: [
+      { url: 'https://blog.jquery.com/2019/04/10/jquery-3-4-0-released/' },
+      { url: 'https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11358' },
+      { url: 'https://github.com/jquery/jquery/commit/753d591aea698e57d6db58c9f722cd0808619b1b' },
+    ],
+    location: {
+      file: 'node_modules/sass-true/docs/assets/webpack/common.min.js',
+      dependency: { package: { name: 'jquery' }, version: '3.3.1' },
+    },
+    remediations: [null],
+    solution: null,
+    state: 'dismissed',
+    blob_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/blob/ad137f0a8ac59af961afe47d04e5cc062c6864a9/node_modules/sass-true/docs/assets/webpack/common.min.js',
+  },
+  {
+    id: null,
+    report_type: 'dependency_scanning',
+    name:
+      'jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution in jquery',
+    severity: 'low',
+    scanner: { external_id: 'retire.js', name: 'Retire.js' },
+    identifiers: [
+      {
+        external_type: 'cve',
+        external_id: 'CVE-2019-11358',
+        name: 'CVE-2019-11358',
+        url: 'https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-11358',
+      },
+    ],
+    project_fingerprint: 'eb86aa13eb9d897a083ead6e134aa78aa9cadd52',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_issue_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_merge_request_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    create_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback',
+    project: {
+      id: 7071551,
+      name: 'gitlab-ui',
+      full_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui',
+      full_name: 'GitLab.org / gitlab-ui',
+    },
+    dismissal_feedback: {
+      id: 2527,
+      created_at: '2019-08-26T12:29:43.624Z',
+      project_id: 7071551,
+      author: {
+        id: 181229,
+        name: "Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert",
+        username: 'leipert',
+        state: 'active',
+        avatar_url:
+          'https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/19a1f1260fa70323f35bc508927921a2?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+        web_url: 'https://gitlab.com/leipert',
+        status_tooltip_html: null,
+        path: '/leipert',
+      },
+      comment_details: {
+        comment: 'This particular jQuery version appears in a test path of tinycolor2.',
+        comment_timestamp: '2019-08-26T12:30:14.840Z',
+        comment_author: {
+          id: 181229,
+          name: "Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert",
+          username: 'leipert',
+          state: 'active',
+          avatar_url:
+            'https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/19a1f1260fa70323f35bc508927921a2?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+          web_url: 'https://gitlab.com/leipert',
+          status_tooltip_html: null,
+          path: '/leipert',
+        },
+      },
+      pipeline: { id: 78375355, path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/pipelines/78375355' },
+      destroy_vulnerability_feedback_dismissal_path:
+        '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/vulnerability_feedback/2527',
+      category: 'dependency_scanning',
+      feedback_type: 'dismissal',
+      branch: 'leipert-dogfood-secure',
+      project_fingerprint: 'eb86aa13eb9d897a083ead6e134aa78aa9cadd52',
+    },
+    issue_feedback: null,
+    merge_request_feedback: null,
+    description: null,
+    links: [
+      { url: 'https://blog.jquery.com/2019/04/10/jquery-3-4-0-released/' },
+      { url: 'https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11358' },
+      { url: 'https://github.com/jquery/jquery/commit/753d591aea698e57d6db58c9f722cd0808619b1b' },
+    ],
+    location: {
+      file: 'node_modules/tinycolor2/demo/jquery-1.9.1.js',
+      dependency: { package: { name: 'jquery' }, version: '1.9.1' },
+    },
+    remediations: [null],
+    solution: null,
+    state: 'dismissed',
+    blob_path:
+      '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/blob/ad137f0a8ac59af961afe47d04e5cc062c6864a9/node_modules/tinycolor2/demo/jquery-1.9.1.js',
+  },
+];
+
+export const sastDiffSuccessMock = {
+  added: [mockFindings[0]],
+  fixed: [mockFindings[1], mockFindings[2]],
+  existing: [mockFindings[3]],
+  base_report_created_at: '2020-01-01T10:00:00.000Z',
+  base_report_out_of_date: false,
+  head_report_created_at: '2020-01-10T10:00:00.000Z',
+};
+
+export const secretScanningDiffSuccessMock = {
+  added: [mockFindings[0], mockFindings[1]],
+  fixed: [mockFindings[2]],
+  base_report_created_at: '2020-01-01T10:00:00.000Z',
+  base_report_out_of_date: false,
+  head_report_created_at: '2020-01-10T10:00:00.000Z',
+};
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/security_reports_app_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/security_reports_app_spec.js
index ab87d80b291..d11b519e5ad 100644
--- a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/security_reports_app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/security_reports_app_spec.js
@@ -1,13 +1,32 @@
-import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import { mount, createLocalVue } from '@vue/test-utils';
+import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
+import { merge } from 'lodash';
+import Vuex from 'vuex';
+import { trimText } from 'helpers/text_helper';
+import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
+import {
+  sastDiffSuccessMock,
+  secretScanningDiffSuccessMock,
+} from 'jest/vue_shared/security_reports/mock_data';
 import Api from '~/api';
-import Flash from '~/flash';
+import createFlash from '~/flash';
+import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
+import {
+  REPORT_TYPE_SAST,
+  REPORT_TYPE_SECRET_DETECTION,
+} from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/constants';
 import SecurityReportsApp from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/security_reports_app.vue';
 
 jest.mock('~/flash');
 
+const localVue = createLocalVue();
+localVue.use(Vuex);
+
+const SAST_COMPARISON_PATH = '/sast.json';
+const SECRET_SCANNING_COMPARISON_PATH = '/secret_detection.json';
+
 describe('Security reports app', () => {
   let wrapper;
-  let mrTabsMock;
 
   const props = {
     pipelineId: 123,
@@ -15,148 +34,290 @@ describe('Security reports app', () => {
     securityReportsDocsPath: '/docs',
   };
 
-  const createComponent = () => {
-    wrapper = mount(SecurityReportsApp, {
-      propsData: { ...props },
-    });
+  const createComponent = options => {
+    wrapper = mount(
+      SecurityReportsApp,
+      merge(
+        {
+          localVue,
+          propsData: { ...props },
+        },
+        options,
+      ),
+    );
   };
 
   const anyParams = expect.any(Object);
 
   const findPipelinesTabAnchor = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="show-pipelines"]');
   const findHelpLink = () => wrapper.find('[data-testid="help"]');
-  const setupMrTabsMock = () => {
-    mrTabsMock = { tabShown: jest.fn() };
-    window.mrTabs = mrTabsMock;
-  };
   const setupMockJobArtifact = reportType => {
     jest
       .spyOn(Api, 'pipelineJobs')
       .mockResolvedValue({ data: [{ artifacts: [{ file_type: reportType }] }] });
   };
+  const expectPipelinesTabAnchor = () => {
+    const mrTabsMock = { tabShown: jest.fn() };
+    window.mrTabs = mrTabsMock;
+    findPipelinesTabAnchor().trigger('click');
+    expect(mrTabsMock.tabShown.mock.calls).toEqual([['pipelines']]);
+  };
 
   afterEach(() => {
     wrapper.destroy();
     delete window.mrTabs;
   });
 
-  describe.each(SecurityReportsApp.reportTypes)('given a report type %p', reportType => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      window.mrTabs = { tabShown: jest.fn() };
-      setupMockJobArtifact(reportType);
-      createComponent();
-      return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
-    });
+  describe.each([false, true])(
+    'given the coreSecurityMrWidgetCounts feature flag is %p',
+    coreSecurityMrWidgetCounts => {
+      const createComponentWithFlag = options =>
+        createComponent(
+          merge(
+            {
+              provide: {
+                glFeatures: {
+                  coreSecurityMrWidgetCounts,
+                },
+              },
+            },
+            options,
+          ),
+        );
 
-    it('calls the pipelineJobs API correctly', () => {
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(props.projectId, props.pipelineId, anyParams);
-    });
+      describe.each(SecurityReportsApp.reportTypes)('given a report type %p', reportType => {
+        beforeEach(() => {
+          window.mrTabs = { tabShown: jest.fn() };
+          setupMockJobArtifact(reportType);
+          createComponentWithFlag();
+          return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+        });
 
-    it('renders the expected message', () => {
-      expect(wrapper.text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(SecurityReportsApp.i18n.scansHaveRun);
-    });
+        it('calls the pipelineJobs API correctly', () => {
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            props.projectId,
+            props.pipelineId,
+            anyParams,
+          );
+        });
 
-    describe('clicking the anchor to the pipelines tab', () => {
-      beforeEach(() => {
-        setupMrTabsMock();
-        findPipelinesTabAnchor().trigger('click');
+        it('renders the expected message', () => {
+          expect(wrapper.text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(SecurityReportsApp.i18n.scansHaveRun);
+        });
+
+        describe('clicking the anchor to the pipelines tab', () => {
+          it('calls the mrTabs.tabShown global', () => {
+            expectPipelinesTabAnchor();
+          });
+        });
+
+        it('renders a help link', () => {
+          expect(findHelpLink().attributes()).toMatchObject({
+            href: props.securityReportsDocsPath,
+          });
+        });
       });
 
-      it('calls the mrTabs.tabShown global', () => {
-        expect(mrTabsMock.tabShown.mock.calls).toEqual([['pipelines']]);
+      describe('given a report type "foo"', () => {
+        beforeEach(() => {
+          setupMockJobArtifact('foo');
+          createComponentWithFlag();
+          return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+        });
+
+        it('calls the pipelineJobs API correctly', () => {
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            props.projectId,
+            props.pipelineId,
+            anyParams,
+          );
+        });
+
+        it('renders nothing', () => {
+          expect(wrapper.html()).toBe('');
+        });
       });
-    });
 
-    it('renders a help link', () => {
-      expect(findHelpLink().attributes()).toMatchObject({
-        href: props.securityReportsDocsPath,
+      describe('security artifacts on last page of multi-page response', () => {
+        const numPages = 3;
+
+        beforeEach(() => {
+          jest
+            .spyOn(Api, 'pipelineJobs')
+            .mockImplementation(async (projectId, pipelineId, { page }) => {
+              const requestedPage = parseInt(page, 10);
+              if (requestedPage < numPages) {
+                return {
+                  // Some jobs with no relevant artifacts
+                  data: [{}, {}],
+                  headers: { 'x-next-page': String(requestedPage + 1) },
+                };
+              } else if (requestedPage === numPages) {
+                return {
+                  data: [{ artifacts: [{ file_type: SecurityReportsApp.reportTypes[0] }] }],
+                };
+              }
+
+              throw new Error('Test failed due to request of non-existent jobs page');
+            });
+
+          createComponentWithFlag();
+          return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+        });
+
+        it('fetches all pages', () => {
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(numPages);
+        });
+
+        it('renders the expected message', () => {
+          expect(wrapper.text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(SecurityReportsApp.i18n.scansHaveRun);
+        });
       });
-    });
-  });
 
-  describe('given a report type "foo"', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      setupMockJobArtifact('foo');
-      createComponent();
-      return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
-    });
+      describe('given an error from the API', () => {
+        let error;
 
-    it('calls the pipelineJobs API correctly', () => {
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(props.projectId, props.pipelineId, anyParams);
-    });
+        beforeEach(() => {
+          error = new Error('an error');
+          jest.spyOn(Api, 'pipelineJobs').mockRejectedValue(error);
+          createComponentWithFlag();
+          return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+        });
 
-    it('renders nothing', () => {
-      expect(wrapper.html()).toBe('');
-    });
-  });
+        it('calls the pipelineJobs API correctly', () => {
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+          expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            props.projectId,
+            props.pipelineId,
+            anyParams,
+          );
+        });
+
+        it('renders nothing', () => {
+          expect(wrapper.html()).toBe('');
+        });
+
+        it('calls createFlash correctly', () => {
+          expect(createFlash.mock.calls).toEqual([
+            [
+              {
+                message: SecurityReportsApp.i18n.apiError,
+                captureError: true,
+                error,
+              },
+            ],
+          ]);
+        });
+      });
+    },
+  );
 
-  describe('security artifacts on last page of multi-page response', () => {
-    const numPages = 3;
+  describe('given the coreSecurityMrWidgetCounts feature flag is enabled', () => {
+    let mock;
+
+    const createComponentWithFlagEnabled = options =>
+      createComponent(
+        merge(options, {
+          provide: {
+            glFeatures: {
+              coreSecurityMrWidgetCounts: true,
+            },
+          },
+        }),
+      );
 
     beforeEach(() => {
-      jest
-        .spyOn(Api, 'pipelineJobs')
-        .mockImplementation(async (projectId, pipelineId, { page }) => {
-          const requestedPage = parseInt(page, 10);
-          if (requestedPage < numPages) {
-            return {
-              // Some jobs with no relevant artifacts
-              data: [{}, {}],
-              headers: { 'x-next-page': String(requestedPage + 1) },
-            };
-          } else if (requestedPage === numPages) {
-            return {
-              data: [{ artifacts: [{ file_type: SecurityReportsApp.reportTypes[0] }] }],
-            };
-          }
-
-          throw new Error('Test failed due to request of non-existent jobs page');
-        });
-
-      createComponent();
-      return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
     });
 
-    it('fetches all pages', () => {
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(numPages);
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
     });
 
-    it('renders the expected message', () => {
-      expect(wrapper.text()).toMatchInterpolatedText(SecurityReportsApp.i18n.scansHaveRun);
-    });
-  });
+    const SAST_SUCCESS_MESSAGE =
+      'Security scanning detected 1 potential vulnerability 1 Critical 0 High and 0 Others';
+    const SECRET_SCANNING_SUCCESS_MESSAGE =
+      'Security scanning detected 2 potential vulnerabilities 1 Critical 1 High and 0 Others';
+    describe.each`
+      reportType                      | pathProp                          | path                               | successResponse                  | successMessage
+      ${REPORT_TYPE_SAST}             | ${'sastComparisonPath'}           | ${SAST_COMPARISON_PATH}            | ${sastDiffSuccessMock}           | ${SAST_SUCCESS_MESSAGE}
+      ${REPORT_TYPE_SECRET_DETECTION} | ${'secretScanningComparisonPath'} | ${SECRET_SCANNING_COMPARISON_PATH} | ${secretScanningDiffSuccessMock} | ${SECRET_SCANNING_SUCCESS_MESSAGE}
+    `(
+      'given a $pathProp and $reportType artifact',
+      ({ reportType, pathProp, path, successResponse, successMessage }) => {
+        beforeEach(() => {
+          setupMockJobArtifact(reportType);
+        });
 
-  describe('given an error from the API', () => {
-    let error;
+        describe('when loading', () => {
+          beforeEach(() => {
+            mock = new MockAdapter(axios, { delayResponse: 1 });
+            mock.onGet(path).replyOnce(200, successResponse);
 
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      error = new Error('an error');
-      jest.spyOn(Api, 'pipelineJobs').mockRejectedValue(error);
-      createComponent();
-      return wrapper.vm.$nextTick();
-    });
+            createComponentWithFlagEnabled({
+              propsData: {
+                [pathProp]: path,
+              },
+            });
 
-    it('calls the pipelineJobs API correctly', () => {
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
-      expect(Api.pipelineJobs).toHaveBeenCalledWith(props.projectId, props.pipelineId, anyParams);
-    });
+            return waitForPromises();
+          });
 
-    it('renders nothing', () => {
-      expect(wrapper.html()).toBe('');
-    });
+          it('should have loading message', () => {
+            expect(wrapper.text()).toBe('Security scanning is loading');
+          });
 
-    it('calls Flash correctly', () => {
-      expect(Flash.mock.calls).toEqual([
-        [
-          {
-            message: SecurityReportsApp.i18n.apiError,
-            captureError: true,
-            error,
-          },
-        ],
-      ]);
-    });
+          it('should not render the pipeline tab anchor', () => {
+            expect(findPipelinesTabAnchor().exists()).toBe(false);
+          });
+        });
+
+        describe('when successfully loaded', () => {
+          beforeEach(() => {
+            mock.onGet(path).replyOnce(200, successResponse);
+
+            createComponentWithFlagEnabled({
+              propsData: {
+                [pathProp]: path,
+              },
+            });
+
+            return waitForPromises();
+          });
+
+          it('should show counts', () => {
+            expect(trimText(wrapper.text())).toContain(successMessage);
+          });
+
+          it('should render the pipeline tab anchor', () => {
+            expectPipelinesTabAnchor();
+          });
+        });
+
+        describe('when an error occurs', () => {
+          beforeEach(() => {
+            mock.onGet(path).replyOnce(500);
+
+            createComponentWithFlagEnabled({
+              propsData: {
+                [pathProp]: path,
+              },
+            });
+
+            return waitForPromises();
+          });
+
+          it('should show error message', () => {
+            expect(trimText(wrapper.text())).toContain('Loading resulted in an error');
+          });
+
+          it('should render the pipeline tab anchor', () => {
+            expectPipelinesTabAnchor();
+          });
+        });
+      },
+    );
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/store/getters_spec.js b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/store/getters_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8de704be455
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend/vue_shared/security_reports/store/getters_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+import createState from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/store/state';
+import createSastState from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/store/modules/sast/state';
+import createSecretScanningState from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/store/modules/secret_detection/state';
+import { groupedTextBuilder } from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/store/utils';
+import {
+  groupedSummaryText,
+  allReportsHaveError,
+  areReportsLoading,
+  anyReportHasError,
+  areAllReportsLoading,
+  anyReportHasIssues,
+  summaryCounts,
+} from '~/vue_shared/security_reports/store/getters';
+import { CRITICAL, HIGH, LOW } from '~/vulnerabilities/constants';
+
+const generateVuln = severity => ({ severity });
+
+describe('Security reports getters', () => {
+  let state;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    state = createState();
+    state.sast = createSastState();
+    state.secretDetection = createSecretScanningState();
+  });
+
+  describe('summaryCounts', () => {
+    it('returns 0 count for empty state', () => {
+      expect(summaryCounts(state)).toEqual({
+        critical: 0,
+        high: 0,
+        other: 0,
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('combines all reports', () => {
+      it('of the same severity', () => {
+        state.sast.newIssues = [generateVuln(CRITICAL)];
+        state.secretDetection.newIssues = [generateVuln(CRITICAL)];
+
+        expect(summaryCounts(state)).toEqual({
+          critical: 2,
+          high: 0,
+          other: 0,
+        });
+      });
+
+      it('of different severities', () => {
+        state.sast.newIssues = [generateVuln(CRITICAL)];
+        state.secretDetection.newIssues = [generateVuln(HIGH), generateVuln(LOW)];
+
+        expect(summaryCounts(state)).toEqual({
+          critical: 1,
+          high: 1,
+          other: 1,
+        });
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('groupedSummaryText', () => {
+    it('returns failed text', () => {
+      expect(
+        groupedSummaryText(state, {
+          allReportsHaveError: true,
+          areReportsLoading: false,
+          summaryCounts: {},
+        }),
+      ).toEqual({ message: 'Security scanning failed loading any results' });
+    });
+
+    it('returns `is loading` as status text', () => {
+      expect(
+        groupedSummaryText(state, {
+          allReportsHaveError: false,
+          areReportsLoading: true,
+          summaryCounts: {},
+        }),
+      ).toEqual(
+        groupedTextBuilder({
+          reportType: 'Security scanning',
+          critical: 0,
+          high: 0,
+          other: 0,
+          status: 'is loading',
+        }),
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('returns no new status text if there are existing ones', () => {
+      expect(
+        groupedSummaryText(state, {
+          allReportsHaveError: false,
+          areReportsLoading: false,
+          summaryCounts: {},
+        }),
+      ).toEqual(
+        groupedTextBuilder({
+          reportType: 'Security scanning',
+          critical: 0,
+          high: 0,
+          other: 0,
+          status: '',
+        }),
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('areReportsLoading', () => {
+    it('returns true when any report is loading', () => {
+      state.sast.isLoading = true;
+
+      expect(areReportsLoading(state)).toEqual(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when none of the reports are loading', () => {
+      expect(areReportsLoading(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('areAllReportsLoading', () => {
+    it('returns true when all reports are loading', () => {
+      state.sast.isLoading = true;
+      state.secretDetection.isLoading = true;
+
+      expect(areAllReportsLoading(state)).toEqual(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when some of the reports are loading', () => {
+      state.sast.isLoading = true;
+
+      expect(areAllReportsLoading(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when none of the reports are loading', () => {
+      expect(areAllReportsLoading(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('allReportsHaveError', () => {
+    it('returns true when all reports have error', () => {
+      state.sast.hasError = true;
+      state.secretDetection.hasError = true;
+
+      expect(allReportsHaveError(state)).toEqual(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when none of the reports have error', () => {
+      expect(allReportsHaveError(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when one of the reports does not have error', () => {
+      state.secretDetection.hasError = true;
+
+      expect(allReportsHaveError(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('anyReportHasError', () => {
+    it('returns true when any of the reports has error', () => {
+      state.sast.hasError = true;
+
+      expect(anyReportHasError(state)).toEqual(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when none of the reports has error', () => {
+      expect(anyReportHasError(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('anyReportHasIssues', () => {
+    it('returns true when any of the reports has new issues', () => {
+      state.sast.newIssues.push(generateVuln(LOW));
+
+      expect(anyReportHasIssues(state)).toEqual(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when none of the reports has error', () => {
+      expect(anyReportHasIssues(state)).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/__snapshots__/ide_integration_spec.js.snap b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/__snapshots__/ide_integration_spec.js.snap
deleted file mode 100644
index 877cc78a111..00000000000
--- a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/__snapshots__/ide_integration_spec.js.snap
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
-// Jest Snapshot v1, https://goo.gl/fbAQLP
-
-exports[`WebIDE runs 1`] = `
-<div>
-  <article
-    class="ide position-relative d-flex flex-column align-items-stretch"
-  >
-    <div
-      class="ide-view flex-grow d-flex"
-    >
-      <div
-        class="gl-relative multi-file-commit-panel flex-column"
-        style="width: 340px;"
-      >
-        <div
-          class="multi-file-commit-panel-inner"
-          data-testid="ide-side-bar-inner"
-        >
-          <div
-            class="multi-file-loading-container"
-          >
-            <div
-              class="animation-container"
-            >
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-1"
-              />
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-2"
-              />
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-3"
-              />
-            </div>
-          </div>
-          <div
-            class="multi-file-loading-container"
-          >
-            <div
-              class="animation-container"
-            >
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-1"
-              />
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-2"
-              />
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-3"
-              />
-            </div>
-          </div>
-          <div
-            class="multi-file-loading-container"
-          >
-            <div
-              class="animation-container"
-            >
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-1"
-              />
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-2"
-              />
-              <div
-                class="skeleton-line-3"
-              />
-            </div>
-          </div>
-        </div>
-        <div
-          class="position-absolute position-top-0 position-bottom-0 drag-handle position-right-0"
-          size="340"
-          style="cursor: ew-resize;"
-        />
-      </div>
-      <div
-        class="multi-file-edit-pane"
-      >
-        <div
-          class="ide-empty-state"
-        >
-          <div
-            class="row js-empty-state"
-          >
-            <div
-              class="col-12"
-            >
-              <div
-                class="svg-content svg-250"
-              >
-                <img
-                  src="/test/empty_state.svg"
-                />
-              </div>
-            </div>
-            <div
-              class="col-12"
-            >
-              <div
-                class="text-content text-center"
-              >
-                <h4>
-                  Make and review changes in the browser with the Web IDE
-                </h4>
-              </div>
-            </div>
-          </div>
-        </div>
-      </div>
-    </div>
-  </article>
-</div>
-`;
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/ide_helper.js b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/helpers/ide_helper.js
index fea8bc24031..7ace586fe08 100644
--- a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/ide_helper.js
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/helpers/ide_helper.js
@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
+import { TEST_HOST } from 'helpers/test_constants';
 import { findAllByText, fireEvent, getByLabelText, screen } from '@testing-library/dom';
+import { initIde } from '~/ide';
+import extendStore from '~/ide/stores/extend';
+import { IDE_DATASET } from './mock_data';
 
 const isFolderRowOpen = row => row.matches('.folder.is-open');
 
@@ -12,16 +16,23 @@ const clickOnLeftSidebarTab = name => {
   button.click();
 };
 
-const findMonacoEditor = () =>
+export const findMonacoEditor = () =>
   screen.findByLabelText(/Editor content;/).then(x => x.closest('.monaco-editor'));
 
-const findAndSetEditorValue = async value => {
+export const findAndSetEditorValue = async value => {
   const editor = await findMonacoEditor();
   const uri = editor.getAttribute('data-uri');
 
   window.monaco.editor.getModel(uri).setValue(value);
 };
 
+export const getEditorValue = async () => {
+  const editor = await findMonacoEditor();
+  const uri = editor.getAttribute('data-uri');
+
+  return window.monaco.editor.getModel(uri).getValue();
+};
+
 const findTreeBody = () => screen.findByTestId('ide-tree-body', {}, { timeout: 5000 });
 
 const findRootActions = () => screen.findByTestId('ide-root-actions', {}, { timeout: 7000 });
@@ -107,6 +118,10 @@ export const createFile = async (path, content) => {
   await findAndSetEditorValue(content);
 };
 
+export const getFilesList = () => {
+  return screen.getAllByTestId('file-row-name-container').map(e => e.textContent.trim());
+};
+
 export const deleteFile = async path => {
   const row = await findAndTraverseToPath(path);
   clickFileRowAction(row, 'Delete');
@@ -120,3 +135,16 @@ export const commit = async () => {
 
   screen.getByText('Commit').click();
 };
+
+export const createIdeComponent = (container, { isRepoEmpty = false, path = '' } = {}) => {
+  global.jsdom.reconfigure({
+    url: `${TEST_HOST}/-/ide/project/gitlab-test/lorem-ipsum${
+      isRepoEmpty ? '-empty' : ''
+    }/tree/master/-/${path}`,
+  });
+
+  const el = document.createElement('div');
+  Object.assign(el.dataset, IDE_DATASET);
+  container.appendChild(el);
+  return initIde(el, { extendStore });
+};
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/helpers/mock_data.js b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/helpers/mock_data.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f70739e5ac0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/helpers/mock_data.js
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+export const IDE_DATASET = {
+  emptyStateSvgPath: '/test/empty_state.svg',
+  noChangesStateSvgPath: '/test/no_changes_state.svg',
+  committedStateSvgPath: '/test/committed_state.svg',
+  pipelinesEmptyStateSvgPath: '/test/pipelines_empty_state.svg',
+  promotionSvgPath: '/test/promotion.svg',
+  ciHelpPagePath: '/test/ci_help_page',
+  webIDEHelpPagePath: '/test/web_ide_help_page',
+  clientsidePreviewEnabled: 'true',
+  renderWhitespaceInCode: 'false',
+  codesandboxBundlerUrl: 'test/codesandbox_bundler',
+};
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/ide_integration_spec.js b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/ide_integration_spec.js
index 1f5c1d38450..9d515d20749 100644
--- a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/ide_integration_spec.js
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/ide_integration_spec.js
@@ -1,61 +1,27 @@
-import { TEST_HOST } from 'helpers/test_constants';
 import { waitForText } from 'helpers/wait_for_text';
 import waitForPromises from 'helpers/wait_for_promises';
 import { useOverclockTimers } from 'test_helpers/utils/overclock_timers';
 import { createCommitId } from 'test_helpers/factories/commit_id';
-import { initIde } from '~/ide';
-import extendStore from '~/ide/stores/extend';
-import * as ideHelper from './ide_helper';
-
-const TEST_DATASET = {
-  emptyStateSvgPath: '/test/empty_state.svg',
-  noChangesStateSvgPath: '/test/no_changes_state.svg',
-  committedStateSvgPath: '/test/committed_state.svg',
-  pipelinesEmptyStateSvgPath: '/test/pipelines_empty_state.svg',
-  promotionSvgPath: '/test/promotion.svg',
-  ciHelpPagePath: '/test/ci_help_page',
-  webIDEHelpPagePath: '/test/web_ide_help_page',
-  clientsidePreviewEnabled: 'true',
-  renderWhitespaceInCode: 'false',
-  codesandboxBundlerUrl: 'test/codesandbox_bundler',
-};
+import * as ideHelper from './helpers/ide_helper';
 
 describe('WebIDE', () => {
   useOverclockTimers();
 
   let vm;
-  let root;
+  let container;
 
   beforeEach(() => {
-    root = document.createElement('div');
-    document.body.appendChild(root);
-
-    global.jsdom.reconfigure({
-      url: `${TEST_HOST}/-/ide/project/gitlab-test/lorem-ipsum`,
-    });
+    setFixtures('<div class="webide-container"></div>');
+    container = document.querySelector('.webide-container');
   });
 
   afterEach(() => {
     vm.$destroy();
     vm = null;
-    root.remove();
-  });
-
-  const createComponent = () => {
-    const el = document.createElement('div');
-    Object.assign(el.dataset, TEST_DATASET);
-    root.appendChild(el);
-    vm = initIde(el, { extendStore });
-  };
-
-  it('runs', () => {
-    createComponent();
-
-    expect(root).toMatchSnapshot();
   });
 
   it('user commits changes', async () => {
-    createComponent();
+    vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container);
 
     await ideHelper.createFile('foo/bar/test.txt', 'Lorem ipsum dolar sit');
     await ideHelper.deleteFile('foo/bar/.gitkeep');
@@ -89,7 +55,7 @@ describe('WebIDE', () => {
   });
 
   it('user adds file that starts with +', async () => {
-    createComponent();
+    vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container);
 
     await ideHelper.createFile('+test', 'Hello world!');
     await ideHelper.openFile('+test');
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/ide/user_opens_ide_spec.js b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/user_opens_ide_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..958cab483eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/ide/user_opens_ide_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+import { useOverclockTimers } from 'test_helpers/utils/overclock_timers';
+import { findByText, screen } from '@testing-library/dom';
+import * as ideHelper from './helpers/ide_helper';
+
+describe('IDE: User opens IDE', () => {
+  useOverclockTimers();
+
+  let vm;
+  let container;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    setFixtures('<div class="webide-container"></div>');
+    container = document.querySelector('.webide-container');
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+    vm = null;
+  });
+
+  it('shows loading indicator while the IDE is loading', async () => {
+    vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container);
+
+    expect(container.querySelectorAll('.multi-file-loading-container')).toHaveLength(3);
+  });
+
+  describe('when the project is empty', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container, { isRepoEmpty: true });
+    });
+
+    it('shows "No files" in the left sidebar', async () => {
+      expect(await screen.findByText('No files')).toBeDefined();
+    });
+
+    it('shows a "New file" button', async () => {
+      const button = await screen.findByTitle('New file');
+
+      expect(button.tagName).toEqual('BUTTON');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when the file tree is loaded', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container);
+
+      await screen.findByText('README'); // wait for file tree to load
+    });
+
+    it('shows a list of files in the left sidebar', async () => {
+      expect(ideHelper.getFilesList()).toEqual(
+        expect.arrayContaining(['README', 'LICENSE', 'CONTRIBUTING.md']),
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('shows empty state in the main editor window', async () => {
+      expect(
+        await screen.findByText(
+          "Select a file from the left sidebar to begin editing. Afterwards, you'll be able to commit your changes.",
+        ),
+      ).toBeDefined();
+    });
+
+    it('shows commit button in disabled state', async () => {
+      const button = await screen.findByTestId('begin-commit-button');
+
+      expect(button.getAttribute('disabled')).toBeDefined();
+    });
+
+    it('shows branch/MR dropdown with master selected', async () => {
+      const dropdown = await screen.findByTestId('ide-nav-dropdown');
+
+      expect(dropdown.textContent).toContain('master');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('a path to a text file is present in the URL', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container, { path: 'README.md' });
+
+      // a new tab is open for README.md
+      await findByText(document.querySelector('.multi-file-edit-pane'), 'README.md');
+    });
+
+    it('opens the file and its contents are shown in Monaco', async () => {
+      expect(await ideHelper.getEditorValue()).toContain('Sample repo for testing gitlab features');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('a path to a binary file is present in the URL', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container, { path: 'Gemfile.zip' });
+
+      // a new tab is open for Gemfile.zip
+      await findByText(document.querySelector('.multi-file-edit-pane'), 'Gemfile.zip');
+    });
+
+    it('shows download viewer', async () => {
+      const downloadButton = await screen.findByText('Download');
+
+      expect(downloadButton.getAttribute('download')).toEqual('Gemfile.zip');
+      expect(downloadButton.getAttribute('href')).toContain('/raw/');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('a path to an image is present in the URL', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container, { path: 'files/images/logo-white.png' });
+
+      // a new tab is open for logo-white.png
+      await findByText(document.querySelector('.multi-file-edit-pane'), 'logo-white.png');
+    });
+
+    it('shows image viewer', async () => {
+      const viewer = await screen.findByTestId('image-viewer');
+      const img = viewer.querySelector('img');
+
+      expect(img.src).toContain('logo-white.png');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('path in URL is a directory', () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container, { path: 'files/images' });
+
+      // wait for folders in left sidebar to be expanded
+      await screen.findByText('images');
+    });
+
+    it('expands folders in the left sidebar', () => {
+      expect(ideHelper.getFilesList()).toEqual(
+        expect.arrayContaining(['files', 'images', 'logo-white.png', 'logo-black.png']),
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('shows empty state in the main editor window', async () => {
+      expect(
+        await screen.findByText(
+          "Select a file from the left sidebar to begin editing. Afterwards, you'll be able to commit your changes.",
+        ),
+      ).toBeDefined();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("a file for path in url doesn't exist in the repo", () => {
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+      vm = ideHelper.createIdeComponent(container, { path: 'abracadabra/hocus-focus.txt' });
+
+      // a new tab is open for hocus-focus.txt
+      await findByText(document.querySelector('.multi-file-edit-pane'), 'hocus-focus.txt');
+    });
+
+    it('create new folders and file in the left sidebar', () => {
+      expect(ideHelper.getFilesList()).toEqual(
+        expect.arrayContaining(['abracadabra', 'hocus-focus.txt']),
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('creates a blank new file', async () => {
+      expect(await ideHelper.getEditorValue()).toEqual('\n');
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/fixtures.js b/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/fixtures.js
index 50fa4859dfa..294a0d77091 100644
--- a/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/fixtures.js
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/fixtures.js
@@ -1,10 +1,24 @@
 /* eslint-disable global-require, import/no-unresolved */
 import { memoize } from 'lodash';
+import { readFileSync } from 'fs';
+import { join } from 'path';
 
 export const getProject = () => require('test_fixtures/api/projects/get.json');
+export const getEmptyProject = () => require('test_fixtures/api/projects/get_empty.json');
 export const getBranch = () => require('test_fixtures/api/projects/branches/get.json');
 export const getMergeRequests = () => require('test_fixtures/api/merge_requests/get.json');
 export const getRepositoryFiles = () => require('test_fixtures/projects_json/files.json');
+
+export const getBlobReadme = () =>
+  readFileSync(require.resolve('test_fixtures/blob/text/README.md'), 'utf8');
+export const getBlobZip = () =>
+  readFileSync(require.resolve('test_fixtures/blob/binary/Gemfile.zip'), 'utf8');
+export const getBlobImage = () =>
+  readFileSync(
+    join(require.resolve('test_fixtures/blob/text/README.md'), '../..', 'images/logo-white.png'),
+    'utf8',
+  );
+
 export const getPipelinesEmptyResponse = () =>
   require('test_fixtures/projects_json/pipelines_empty.json');
 export const getCommit = memoize(() => getBranch().commit);
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/index.js b/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/index.js
index b3979d05ea5..6f090565635 100644
--- a/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/index.js
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/index.js
@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
 import { Server, Model, RestSerializer } from 'miragejs';
-import { getProject, getBranch, getMergeRequests, getRepositoryFiles } from 'test_helpers/fixtures';
+import {
+  getProject,
+  getEmptyProject,
+  getBranch,
+  getMergeRequests,
+  getRepositoryFiles,
+  getBlobReadme,
+  getBlobImage,
+  getBlobZip,
+} from 'test_helpers/fixtures';
 import setupRoutes from './routes';
 
 export const createMockServerOptions = () => ({
@@ -18,9 +27,23 @@ export const createMockServerOptions = () => ({
   seeds(schema) {
     schema.db.loadData({
       files: getRepositoryFiles().map(path => ({ path })),
-      projects: [getProject()],
+      projects: [getProject(), getEmptyProject()],
       branches: [getBranch()],
       mergeRequests: getMergeRequests(),
+      filesRaw: [
+        {
+          raw: getBlobReadme(),
+          path: 'README.md',
+        },
+        {
+          raw: getBlobZip(),
+          path: 'Gemfile.zip',
+        },
+        {
+          raw: getBlobImage(),
+          path: 'files/images/logo-white.png',
+        },
+      ],
       userPermissions: [
         {
           createMergeRequestIn: true,
diff --git a/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/routes/repository.js b/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/routes/repository.js
index c5e91c9e87e..166c0cc32db 100644
--- a/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/routes/repository.js
+++ b/spec/frontend_integration/test_helpers/mock_server/routes/repository.js
@@ -19,6 +19,18 @@ export default server => {
     return schema.db.files.map(({ path }) => path);
   });
 
+  server.get('/:namespace/:project/-/blob/:sha/*path', (schema, request) => {
+    const { path } = schema.db.files.findBy({ path: request.params.path });
+
+    return { path, rawPath: request.url.replace('/-/blob', '/-/raw') };
+  });
+
+  server.get('/:namespace/:project/-/raw/:sha/*path', (schema, request) => {
+    const { path } = request.params;
+
+    return schema.db.filesRaw.findBy({ path })?.raw || 'Sample content';
+  });
+
   server.post('/api/v4/projects/:id/repository/commits', (schema, request) => {
     const { branch: branchName, commit_message: message, actions } = JSON.parse(
       request.requestBody,
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/create_alert_issue_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/create_alert_issue_spec.rb
index e6a7434d579..47ee338ad34 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/create_alert_issue_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/create_alert_issue_spec.rb
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::AlertManagement::CreateAlertIssue do
         end
 
         it_behaves_like 'an incident management tracked event', :incident_management_incident_created
+        it_behaves_like 'an incident management tracked event', :incident_management_alert_create_incident
       end
 
       context 'when CreateAlertIssue responds with an error' do
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/destroy_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/destroy_spec.rb
index f74f9186743..acd7070d0d3 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/destroy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/destroy_spec.rb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::AlertManagement::HttpIntegration::Destroy do
   specify { expect(described_class).to require_graphql_authorizations(:admin_operations) }
 
   describe '#resolve' do
-    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(args) }
+    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(**args) }
 
     context 'user has access to project' do
       before do
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/reset_token_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/reset_token_spec.rb
index d3ffb2abb47..96974c2aa6f 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/reset_token_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/http_integration/reset_token_spec.rb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::AlertManagement::HttpIntegration::ResetToken do
   specify { expect(described_class).to require_graphql_authorizations(:admin_operations) }
 
   describe '#resolve' do
-    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(args) }
+    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(**args) }
 
     context 'user has sufficient access to project' do
       before do
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/prometheus_integration/reset_token_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/prometheus_integration/reset_token_spec.rb
index 45d92695e06..ddf23909035 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/prometheus_integration/reset_token_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/prometheus_integration/reset_token_spec.rb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::AlertManagement::PrometheusIntegration::ResetToken do
   specify { expect(described_class).to require_graphql_authorizations(:admin_project) }
 
   describe '#resolve' do
-    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(args) }
+    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(**args) }
 
     context 'user has sufficient access to project' do
       before do
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/update_alert_status_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/update_alert_status_spec.rb
index 08761ce64c2..8465393f299 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/update_alert_status_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/alert_management/update_alert_status_spec.rb
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::AlertManagement::UpdateAlertStatus do
   specify { expect(described_class).to require_graphql_authorizations(:update_alert_management_alert) }
 
   describe '#resolve' do
-    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(args) }
+    subject(:resolve) { mutation_for(project, current_user).resolve(**args) }
 
     context 'user has access to project' do
       before do
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/issues/issue_move_list_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/issues/issue_move_list_spec.rb
index 71c43ed826c..ded5776b3cb 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/issues/issue_move_list_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/issues/issue_move_list_spec.rb
@@ -34,18 +34,18 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Boards::Issues::IssueMoveList do
   end
 
   subject do
-    mutation.resolve(params.merge(move_params))
+    mutation.resolve(**params.merge(move_params))
   end
 
   describe '#ready?' do
     it 'raises an error if required arguments are missing' do
-      expect { mutation.ready?(params) }
+      expect { mutation.ready?(**params) }
         .to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, "At least one of the arguments " \
         "fromListId, toListId, afterId or beforeId is required")
     end
 
     it 'raises an error if only one of fromListId and toListId is present' do
-      expect { mutation.ready?(params.merge(from_list_id: list1.id)) }
+      expect { mutation.ready?(**params.merge(from_list_id: list1.id)) }
         .to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError,
           'Both fromListId and toListId must be present'
         )
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/lists/create_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/lists/create_spec.rb
index b1fe9911c7b..7a638d11ed3 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/lists/create_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/boards/lists/create_spec.rb
@@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Boards::Lists::Create do
 
   describe '#ready?' do
     it 'raises an error if required arguments are missing' do
-      expect { mutation.ready?({ board_id: 'some id' }) }
+      expect { mutation.ready?(board_id: 'some id') }
         .to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, /one and only one of/)
     end
 
     it 'raises an error if too many required arguments are specified' do
-      expect { mutation.ready?({ board_id: 'some id', backlog: true, label_id: 'some label' }) }
+      expect { mutation.ready?(board_id: 'some id', backlog: true, label_id: 'some label') }
         .to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, /one and only one of/)
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/concerns/mutations/finds_by_gid_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/concerns/mutations/finds_by_gid_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..37e0fd611e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/concerns/mutations/finds_by_gid_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Mutations::FindsByGid do
+  include GraphqlHelpers
+
+  let(:mutation_class) do
+    Class.new(Mutations::BaseMutation) do
+      authorize :read_user
+
+      include Mutations::FindsByGid
+    end
+  end
+
+  let(:query) { double('Query', schema: GitlabSchema) }
+  let(:context) { GraphQL::Query::Context.new(query: query, object: nil, values: { current_user: user }) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:gid) { user.to_global_id }
+
+  subject(:mutation) { mutation_class.new(object: nil, context: context, field: nil) }
+
+  it 'calls GitlabSchema.find_by_gid to find objects during authorized_find!' do
+    expect(mutation.authorized_find!(id: gid)).to eq(user)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/container_expiration_policies/update_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/container_expiration_policies/update_spec.rb
index 9c6016e0af4..e22fb951172 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/container_expiration_policies/update_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/container_expiration_policies/update_spec.rb
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::ContainerExpirationPolicies::Update do
   specify { expect(described_class).to require_graphql_authorizations(:destroy_container_image) }
 
   describe '#resolve' do
-    subject { described_class.new(object: project, context: { current_user: user }, field: nil).resolve(params) }
+    subject { described_class.new(object: project, context: { current_user: user }, field: nil).resolve(**params) }
 
     RSpec.shared_examples 'returning a success' do
       it 'returns the container expiration policy with no errors' do
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/discussions/toggle_resolve_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/discussions/toggle_resolve_spec.rb
index 2e5d41a8f1e..162b1249ab5 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/discussions/toggle_resolve_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/discussions/toggle_resolve_spec.rb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Discussions::ToggleResolve do
 
   describe '#resolve' do
     subject do
-      mutation.resolve({ id: id_arg, resolve: resolve_arg })
+      mutation.resolve(id: id_arg, resolve: resolve_arg)
     end
 
     let(:id_arg) { discussion.to_global_id.to_s }
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/issues/create_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/issues/create_spec.rb
index 57658f6b358..422ad40a9cb 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/issues/create_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/issues/create_spec.rb
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Issues::Create do
       project.add_guest(assignee2)
     end
 
-    subject { mutation.resolve(mutation_params) }
+    subject { mutation.resolve(**mutation_params) }
 
     context 'when the user does not have permission to create an issue' do
       it 'raises an error' do
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Issues::Create do
       end
 
       it 'raises exception when mutually exclusive params are given' do
-        expect { mutation.ready?(mutation_params) }
+        expect { mutation.ready?(**mutation_params) }
           .to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, /one and only one of/)
       end
     end
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Issues::Create do
       end
 
       it 'raises exception when mutually exclusive params are given' do
-        expect { mutation.ready?(mutation_params) }
+        expect { mutation.ready?(**mutation_params) }
           .to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, /to resolve a discussion please also provide `merge_request_to_resolve_discussions_of` parameter/)
       end
     end
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Issues::Create do
       end
 
       it 'raises exception when mutually exclusive params are given' do
-        expect { mutation.ready?(mutation_params) }.not_to raise_error
+        expect { mutation.ready?(**mutation_params) }.not_to raise_error
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/labels/create_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/labels/create_spec.rb
index 8b284816d63..b2dd94f31bb 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/labels/create_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/labels/create_spec.rb
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Labels::Create do
   end
 
   describe '#ready?' do
-    subject { mutation.ready?(attributes.merge(extra_params)) }
+    subject { mutation.ready?(**attributes.merge(extra_params)) }
 
     context 'when passing both project_path and group_path' do
       let(:extra_params) { { project_path: 'foo', group_path: 'bar' } }
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/notes/reposition_image_diff_note_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/notes/reposition_image_diff_note_spec.rb
index 8c22e1a1cb6..d88b196cbff 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/mutations/notes/reposition_image_diff_note_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/notes/reposition_image_diff_note_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ RSpec.describe Mutations::Notes::RepositionImageDiffNote do
 
   describe '#resolve' do
     subject do
-      mutation.resolve({ note: note, position: new_position })
+      mutation.resolve(note: note, position: new_position)
     end
 
     let_it_be(:noteable) { create(:merge_request) }
diff --git a/spec/graphql/mutations/releases/update_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/mutations/releases/update_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0406e9c96f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/graphql/mutations/releases/update_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Mutations::Releases::Update do
+  let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
+  let_it_be(:milestone_12_3) { create(:milestone, project: project, title: '12.3') }
+  let_it_be(:milestone_12_4) { create(:milestone, project: project, title: '12.4') }
+  let_it_be(:reporter) { create(:user) }
+  let_it_be(:developer) { create(:user) }
+
+  let_it_be(:tag) { 'v1.1.0'}
+  let_it_be(:name) { 'Version 1.0'}
+  let_it_be(:description) { 'The first release :rocket:' }
+  let_it_be(:released_at) { Time.parse('2018-12-10').utc }
+  let_it_be(:created_at) { Time.parse('2018-11-05').utc }
+  let_it_be(:milestones) { [milestone_12_3.title, milestone_12_4.title] }
+
+  let_it_be(:release) do
+    create(:release, project: project, tag: tag, name: name,
+           description: description, released_at: released_at,
+           created_at: created_at, milestones: [milestone_12_3, milestone_12_4])
+  end
+
+  let(:mutation) { described_class.new(object: nil, context: { current_user: current_user }, field: nil) }
+
+  let(:mutation_arguments) do
+    {
+      project_path: project.full_path,
+      tag: tag
+    }
+  end
+
+  around do |example|
+    freeze_time { example.run }
+  end
+
+  before do
+    project.add_reporter(reporter)
+    project.add_developer(developer)
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'no changes to the release except for the' do |except_for|
+    it 'does not change other release properties' do
+      expect(updated_release.project).to eq(project)
+      expect(updated_release.tag).to eq(tag)
+
+      expect(updated_release.name).to eq(name) unless except_for == :name
+      expect(updated_release.description).to eq(description) unless except_for == :description
+      expect(updated_release.released_at).to eq(released_at) unless except_for == :released_at
+
+      # Right now the milestones are returned in a non-deterministic order.
+      # Because of this, we need to allow for milestones to be returned in any order.
+      # Once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/259012 has been
+      # fixed, this can be updated to expect a specific order.
+      expect(updated_release.milestones).to match_array([milestone_12_3, milestone_12_4]) unless except_for == :milestones
+    end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'validation error with message' do |message|
+    it 'returns the updated release as nil' do
+      expect(updated_release).to be_nil
+    end
+
+    it 'returns a validation error' do
+      expect(subject[:errors]).to eq([message])
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#ready?' do
+    let(:current_user) { developer }
+
+    subject(:ready) do
+      mutation.ready?(**mutation_arguments)
+    end
+
+    context 'when released_at is included as an argument but is passed nil' do
+      let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(released_at: nil) }
+
+      it 'raises a validation error' do
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, 'if the releasedAt argument is provided, it cannot be null')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when milestones is included as an argument but is passed nil' do
+      let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: nil) }
+
+      it 'raises a validation error' do
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ArgumentError, 'if the milestones argument is provided, it cannot be null')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#resolve' do
+    subject(:resolve) do
+      mutation.resolve(**mutation_arguments)
+    end
+
+    let(:updated_release) { subject[:release] }
+
+    context 'when the current user has access to create releases' do
+      let(:current_user) { developer }
+
+      context 'name' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(name: updated_name) }
+
+        context 'when a new name is provided' do
+          let(:updated_name) { 'Updated name' }
+
+          it 'updates the name' do
+            expect(updated_release.name).to eq(updated_name)
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :name
+        end
+
+        context 'when nil is provided' do
+          let(:updated_name) { nil }
+
+          it 'updates the name to be the tag name' do
+            expect(updated_release.name).to eq(tag)
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :name
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'description' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(description: updated_description) }
+
+        context 'when a new description is provided' do
+          let(:updated_description) { 'Updated description' }
+
+          it 'updates the description' do
+            expect(updated_release.description).to eq(updated_description)
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :description
+        end
+
+        context 'when nil is provided' do
+          let(:updated_description) { nil }
+
+          it 'updates the description to nil' do
+            expect(updated_release.description).to eq(nil)
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :description
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'released_at' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(released_at: updated_released_at) }
+
+        context 'when a new released_at is provided' do
+          let(:updated_released_at) { Time.parse('2020-12-10').utc }
+
+          it 'updates the released_at' do
+            expect(updated_release.released_at).to eq(updated_released_at)
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :released_at
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'milestones' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: updated_milestones) }
+
+        context 'when a new set of milestones is provided provided' do
+          let(:updated_milestones) { [milestone_12_3.title] }
+
+          it 'updates the milestone associations' do
+            expect(updated_release.milestones).to eq([milestone_12_3])
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :milestones
+        end
+
+        context 'when an empty array is provided' do
+          let(:updated_milestones) { [] }
+
+          it 'removes all milestone associations' do
+            expect(updated_release.milestones).to eq([])
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'no changes to the release except for the', :milestones
+        end
+
+        context 'when a non-existent milestone title is provided' do
+          let(:updated_milestones) { ['not real'] }
+
+          it_behaves_like 'validation error with message', 'Milestone(s) not found: not real'
+        end
+
+        context 'when a milestone title from a different project is provided' do
+          let(:milestone_in_different_project) { create(:milestone, title: 'milestone in different project') }
+          let(:updated_milestones) { [milestone_in_different_project.title] }
+
+          it_behaves_like 'validation error with message', 'Milestone(s) not found: milestone in different project'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'validation' do
+        context 'when no updated fields are provided' do
+          it_behaves_like 'validation error with message', 'params is empty'
+        end
+
+        context 'when the tag does not exist' do
+          let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(tag: 'not-a-real-tag') }
+
+          it_behaves_like 'validation error with message', 'Tag does not exist'
+        end
+
+        context 'when the project does not exist' do
+          let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(project_path: 'not/a/real/path') }
+
+          it 'raises an error' do
+            expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ResourceNotAvailable, "The resource that you are attempting to access does not exist or you don't have permission to perform this action")
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when the current user doesn't have access to update releases" do
+      let(:current_user) { reporter }
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Graphql::Errors::ResourceNotAvailable, "The resource that you are attempting to access does not exist or you don't have permission to perform this action")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/resolvers/project_merge_requests_resolver_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/resolvers/project_merge_requests_resolver_spec.rb
index bfb3ce91d58..96ca679620d 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/resolvers/project_merge_requests_resolver_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/resolvers/project_merge_requests_resolver_spec.rb
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ RSpec.describe Resolvers::ProjectMergeRequestsResolver do
     end
   end
 
-  def resolve_mr(project, args, resolver: described_class, user: current_user)
+  def resolve_mr(project, resolver: described_class, user: current_user, **args)
     resolve(resolver, obj: project, args: args, ctx: { current_user: user })
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/resolvers/projects/jira_imports_resolver_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/resolvers/projects/jira_imports_resolver_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index ad59cb6b95e..00000000000
--- a/spec/graphql/resolvers/projects/jira_imports_resolver_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,73 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-RSpec.describe Resolvers::Projects::JiraImportsResolver do
-  include GraphqlHelpers
-
-  specify do
-    expect(described_class).to have_nullable_graphql_type(Types::JiraImportType.connection_type)
-  end
-
-  describe '#resolve' do
-    let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
-    let_it_be(:project, reload: true) { create(:project, :public) }
-
-    context 'when project does not have Jira imports' do
-      let(:current_user) { user }
-
-      context 'when user cannot read Jira imports' do
-        context 'when anonymous user' do
-          let(:current_user) { nil }
-
-          it_behaves_like 'no Jira import access'
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when user can read Jira import data' do
-        before do
-          project.add_guest(user)
-        end
-
-        it_behaves_like 'no Jira import data present'
-
-        it 'does not raise access error' do
-          expect do
-            resolve_imports
-          end.not_to raise_error
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when project has Jira imports' do
-      let_it_be(:current_user) { user }
-      let_it_be(:jira_import1) { create(:jira_import_state, :finished, project: project, jira_project_key: 'AA', created_at: 2.days.ago) }
-      let_it_be(:jira_import2) { create(:jira_import_state, :finished, project: project, jira_project_key: 'BB', created_at: 5.days.ago) }
-
-      context 'when user cannot read Jira imports' do
-        context 'when anonymous user' do
-          let(:current_user) { nil }
-
-          it_behaves_like 'no Jira import access'
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when user can access Jira imports' do
-        before do
-          project.add_guest(user)
-        end
-
-        it 'returns Jira imports sorted ascending by created_at time' do
-          imports = resolve_imports
-
-          expect(imports.size).to eq 2
-          expect(imports.map(&:jira_project_key)).to eq %w(BB AA)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  def resolve_imports(args = {}, context = { current_user: current_user })
-    resolve(described_class, obj: project, args: args, ctx: context)
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/types/project_type_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/types/project_type_spec.rb
index be579e92fb3..2b566aee9fc 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/types/project_type_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/types/project_type_spec.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe GitlabSchema.types['Project'] do
+  include GraphqlHelpers
+
   specify { expect(described_class).to expose_permissions_using(Types::PermissionTypes::Project) }
 
   specify { expect(described_class.graphql_name).to eq('Project') }
@@ -163,4 +165,25 @@ RSpec.describe GitlabSchema.types['Project'] do
   end
 
   it_behaves_like 'a GraphQL type with labels'
+
+  describe 'jira_imports' do
+    subject { resolve_field(:jira_imports, project) }
+
+    let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
+
+    context 'when project has Jira imports' do
+      let_it_be(:jira_import1) { create(:jira_import_state, :finished, project: project, jira_project_key: 'AA', created_at: 2.days.ago) }
+      let_it_be(:jira_import2) { create(:jira_import_state, :finished, project: project, jira_project_key: 'BB', created_at: 5.days.ago) }
+
+      it 'retrieves the imports' do
+        expect(subject).to contain_exactly(jira_import1, jira_import2)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when project does not have Jira imports' do
+      it 'returns an empty result' do
+        expect(subject).to be_empty
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/graphql/types/user_type_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/types/user_type_spec.rb
index c8953d9ccb7..4e20efe40d6 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/types/user_type_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/types/user_type_spec.rb
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ RSpec.describe GitlabSchema.types['User'] do
       todos
       state
       status
+      location
       authoredMergeRequests
       assignedMergeRequests
       groupMemberships
diff --git a/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
index a557e9e04da..c7470f31ad8 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
@@ -116,9 +116,9 @@ RSpec.describe ApplicationHelper do
       Time.use_zone('UTC') { example.run }
     end
 
-    def element(*arguments)
+    def element(**arguments)
       @time = Time.zone.parse('2015-07-02 08:23')
-      element = helper.time_ago_with_tooltip(@time, *arguments)
+      element = helper.time_ago_with_tooltip(@time, **arguments)
 
       Nokogiri::HTML::DocumentFragment.parse(element).first_element_child
     end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/blob_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/blob_helper_spec.rb
index cafe4c4275e..764c582e987 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/blob_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/blob_helper_spec.rb
@@ -236,53 +236,41 @@ RSpec.describe BlobHelper do
         let(:data) { File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/support/gitlab_stubs/gitlab_ci.yml')) }
         let(:blob) { fake_blob(path: Gitlab::FileDetector::PATTERNS[:gitlab_ci], data: data) }
 
-        context 'feature enabled' do
-          it 'is true' do
-            expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_truthy
-          end
+        it 'is true' do
+          expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_truthy
+        end
 
-          context 'file is invalid format' do
-            let(:data) { 'foo' }
+        context 'file is invalid format' do
+          let(:data) { 'foo' }
 
-            it 'is false' do
-              expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
-            end
+          it 'is false' do
+            expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
           end
+        end
 
-          context 'does not use the default ci config' do
-            before do
-              project.ci_config_path = 'something_bad'
-            end
-
-            it 'is false' do
-              expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
-            end
+        context 'does not use the default ci config' do
+          before do
+            project.ci_config_path = 'something_bad'
           end
 
-          context 'does not have the needed cookie' do
-            before do
-              helper.request.cookies.delete "suggest_gitlab_ci_yml_commit_#{project.id}"
-            end
-
-            it 'is false' do
-              expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
-            end
+          it 'is false' do
+            expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
           end
+        end
 
-          context 'blob does not have auxiliary view' do
-            before do
-              allow(blob).to receive(:auxiliary_viewer).and_return(nil)
-            end
+        context 'does not have the needed cookie' do
+          before do
+            helper.request.cookies.delete "suggest_gitlab_ci_yml_commit_#{project.id}"
+          end
 
-            it 'is false' do
-              expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
-            end
+          it 'is false' do
+            expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
           end
         end
 
-        context 'feature disabled' do
+        context 'blob does not have auxiliary view' do
           before do
-            stub_feature_flags(suggest_pipeline: false)
+            allow(blob).to receive(:auxiliary_viewer).and_return(nil)
           end
 
           it 'is false' do
@@ -294,10 +282,8 @@ RSpec.describe BlobHelper do
       context 'when file is not a pipeline config file' do
         let(:blob) { fake_blob(path: 'LICENSE') }
 
-        context 'feature enabled' do
-          it 'is false' do
-            expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
-          end
+        it 'is false' do
+          expect(helper.show_suggest_pipeline_creation_celebration?).to be_falsey
         end
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb
index 6a5cb73281e..ecb9c98b1bf 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ RSpec.describe ButtonHelper do
       it 'shows a warning on the dropdown description' do
         description = element.search('.dropdown-menu-inner-content').first
 
-        expect(description.inner_text).to eq "You won't be able to pull or push project code via SSH until you add an SSH key to your profile"
+        expect(description.inner_text).to eq "You won't be able to pull or push repositories via SSH until you add an SSH key to your profile"
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/helpers/diff_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/diff_helper_spec.rb
index c085c3bdbd9..3580959fde0 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/diff_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/diff_helper_spec.rb
@@ -358,30 +358,4 @@ RSpec.describe DiffHelper do
       expect(diff_file_path_text(diff_file, max: 10)).to eq("...open.rb")
     end
   end
-
-  describe 'unified_diff_lines_view_type' do
-    before do
-      controller.params[:view] = 'parallel'
-    end
-
-    describe 'unified diffs enabled' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(unified_diff_lines: true)
-      end
-
-      it 'returns inline view' do
-        expect(helper.unified_diff_lines_view_type(project)).to eq 'inline'
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'unified diffs disabled' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(unified_diff_lines: false)
-      end
-
-      it 'returns parallel view' do
-        expect(helper.unified_diff_lines_view_type(project)).to eq :parallel
-      end
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/icons_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/icons_helper_spec.rb
index c05b2b206cc..357ca0afe46 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/icons_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/icons_helper_spec.rb
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ RSpec.describe IconsHelper do
       it 'does not raise in production mode' do
         stub_rails_env('production')
 
-        expect(File).not_to receive(:read)
+        expect_file_not_to_read(Rails.root.join('node_modules/@gitlab/svgs/dist/icons.json'))
 
         expect { sprite_icon(non_existing) }.not_to raise_error
       end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/search_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/search_helper_spec.rb
index 34af3ce7e5e..208fba4a7f9 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/search_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/search_helper_spec.rb
@@ -104,6 +104,37 @@ RSpec.describe SearchHelper do
         })
       end
 
+      it 'includes the users recently viewed issues with the exact same name', :aggregate_failures do
+        recent_issues = instance_double(::Gitlab::Search::RecentIssues)
+        expect(::Gitlab::Search::RecentIssues).to receive(:new).with(user: user).and_return(recent_issues)
+        project1 = create(:project, namespace: user.namespace)
+        project2 = create(:project, namespace: user.namespace)
+        issue1 = create(:issue, title: 'issue same_name', project: project1)
+        issue2 = create(:issue, title: 'issue same_name', project: project2)
+
+        expect(recent_issues).to receive(:search).with('the search term').and_return(Issue.id_in_ordered([issue1.id, issue2.id]))
+
+        results = search_autocomplete_opts("the search term")
+
+        expect(results.count).to eq(2)
+
+        expect(results[0]).to include({
+          category: 'Recent issues',
+          id: issue1.id,
+          label: 'issue same_name',
+          url: Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers.project_issue_path(issue1.project, issue1),
+          avatar_url: '' # This project didn't have an avatar so set this to ''
+        })
+
+        expect(results[1]).to include({
+          category: 'Recent issues',
+          id: issue2.id,
+          label: 'issue same_name',
+          url: Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers.project_issue_path(issue2.project, issue2),
+          avatar_url: '' # This project didn't have an avatar so set this to ''
+        })
+      end
+
       it 'includes the users recently viewed merge requests', :aggregate_failures do
         recent_merge_requests = instance_double(::Gitlab::Search::RecentMergeRequests)
         expect(::Gitlab::Search::RecentMergeRequests).to receive(:new).with(user: user).and_return(recent_merge_requests)
diff --git a/spec/helpers/sorting_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/sorting_helper_spec.rb
index 1c300aea2df..2d581dfba37 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/sorting_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/sorting_helper_spec.rb
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ RSpec.describe SortingHelper do
       sort_value_latest_activity  => sort_title_latest_activity,
       sort_value_recently_created => sort_title_created_date,
       sort_value_name             => sort_title_name,
+      sort_value_name_desc        => sort_title_name_desc,
       sort_value_stars_desc       => sort_title_stars
     }
   end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/storage_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/storage_helper_spec.rb
index 255ec2a41b4..2cec7203fe1 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/storage_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/storage_helper_spec.rb
@@ -32,10 +32,12 @@ RSpec.describe StorageHelper do
                                wiki_size:            10.bytes,
                                lfs_objects_size:     20.gigabytes,
                                build_artifacts_size: 30.megabytes,
-                               snippets_size:        40.megabytes))
+                               snippets_size:        40.megabytes,
+                               packages_size:        12.megabytes,
+                               uploads_size:         15.megabytes))
     end
 
-    let(:message) { 'Repository: 10 KB / Wikis: 10 Bytes / Build Artifacts: 30 MB / LFS: 20 GB / Snippets: 40 MB' }
+    let(:message) { 'Repository: 10 KB / Wikis: 10 Bytes / Build Artifacts: 30 MB / LFS: 20 GB / Snippets: 40 MB / Packages: 12 MB / Uploads: 15 MB' }
 
     it 'works on ProjectStatistics' do
       expect(helper.storage_counters_details(project.statistics)).to eq(message)
diff --git a/spec/helpers/user_callouts_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/user_callouts_helper_spec.rb
index 4ab3be877b4..250aedda906 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/user_callouts_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/user_callouts_helper_spec.rb
@@ -167,8 +167,20 @@ RSpec.describe UserCalloutsHelper do
 
     subject { helper.show_registration_enabled_user_callout? }
 
+    context 'when on gitlab.com' do
+      before do
+        allow(::Gitlab).to receive(:com?).and_return(true)
+        allow(helper).to receive(:current_user).and_return(admin)
+        stub_application_setting(signup_enabled: true)
+        allow(helper).to receive(:user_dismissed?).with(described_class::REGISTRATION_ENABLED_CALLOUT) { false }
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be false }
+    end
+
     context 'when `current_user` is not an admin' do
       before do
+        allow(::Gitlab).to receive(:com?).and_return(false)
         allow(helper).to receive(:current_user).and_return(user)
         stub_application_setting(signup_enabled: true)
         allow(helper).to receive(:user_dismissed?).with(described_class::REGISTRATION_ENABLED_CALLOUT) { false }
@@ -179,6 +191,7 @@ RSpec.describe UserCalloutsHelper do
 
     context 'when signup is disabled' do
       before do
+        allow(::Gitlab).to receive(:com?).and_return(false)
         allow(helper).to receive(:current_user).and_return(admin)
         stub_application_setting(signup_enabled: false)
         allow(helper).to receive(:user_dismissed?).with(described_class::REGISTRATION_ENABLED_CALLOUT) { false }
@@ -189,6 +202,7 @@ RSpec.describe UserCalloutsHelper do
 
     context 'when user has dismissed callout' do
       before do
+        allow(::Gitlab).to receive(:com?).and_return(false)
         allow(helper).to receive(:current_user).and_return(admin)
         stub_application_setting(signup_enabled: true)
         allow(helper).to receive(:user_dismissed?).with(described_class::REGISTRATION_ENABLED_CALLOUT) { true }
@@ -197,8 +211,9 @@ RSpec.describe UserCalloutsHelper do
       it { is_expected.to be false }
     end
 
-    context 'when `current_user` is an admin, signup is enabled, and user has not dismissed callout' do
+    context 'when not gitlab.com, `current_user` is an admin, signup is enabled, and user has not dismissed callout' do
       before do
+        allow(::Gitlab).to receive(:com?).and_return(false)
         allow(helper).to receive(:current_user).and_return(admin)
         stub_application_setting(signup_enabled: true)
         allow(helper).to receive(:user_dismissed?).with(described_class::REGISTRATION_ENABLED_CALLOUT) { false }
diff --git a/spec/initializers/secret_token_spec.rb b/spec/initializers/secret_token_spec.rb
index 362371e0962..51a14aca4ad 100644
--- a/spec/initializers/secret_token_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/initializers/secret_token_spec.rb
@@ -11,10 +11,13 @@ RSpec.describe 'create_tokens' do
   let(:rsa_key) { /\A-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n.+\n-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n\Z/m.freeze }
 
   before do
-    allow(File).to receive(:write)
-    allow(File).to receive(:delete)
     allow(Rails).to receive_message_chain(:application, :secrets).and_return(secrets)
     allow(Rails).to receive_message_chain(:root, :join) { |string| string }
+
+    allow(File).to receive(:write).and_call_original
+    allow(File).to receive(:write).with(Rails.root.join('config/secrets.yml'))
+    allow(File).to receive(:delete).and_call_original
+    allow(File).to receive(:delete).with(Rails.root.join('.secret'))
     allow(self).to receive(:warn)
     allow(self).to receive(:exit)
   end
@@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'create_tokens' do
         secrets.openid_connect_signing_key = 'openid_connect_signing_key'
 
         allow(File).to receive(:exist?).with('.secret').and_return(true)
-        allow(File).to receive(:read).with('.secret').and_return('file_key')
+        stub_file_read('.secret', content: 'file_key')
       end
 
       context 'when secret_key_base exists in the environment and secrets.yml' do
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/blob/balsamiq/balsamiq_viewer_browser_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/blob/balsamiq/balsamiq_viewer_browser_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 4e06e5c12fc..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/blob/balsamiq/balsamiq_viewer_browser_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-// this file can't be migrated to jest because it relies on the browser to perform integration tests:
-//  see: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/194207#note_301878738
-import { FIXTURES_PATH } from 'spec/test_constants';
-import BalsamiqViewer from '~/blob/balsamiq/balsamiq_viewer';
-
-const bmprPath = `${FIXTURES_PATH}/blob/balsamiq/test.bmpr`;
-
-describe('Balsamiq integration spec', () => {
-  let container;
-  let endpoint;
-  let balsamiqViewer;
-
-  preloadFixtures('static/balsamiq_viewer.html');
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    loadFixtures('static/balsamiq_viewer.html');
-
-    container = document.getElementById('js-balsamiq-viewer');
-    balsamiqViewer = new BalsamiqViewer(container);
-  });
-
-  describe('successful response', () => {
-    beforeEach(done => {
-      endpoint = bmprPath;
-
-      balsamiqViewer
-        .loadFile(endpoint)
-        .then(done)
-        .catch(done.fail);
-    });
-
-    it('does not show loading icon', () => {
-      expect(document.querySelector('.loading')).toBeNull();
-    });
-
-    it('renders the balsamiq previews', () => {
-      expect(document.querySelectorAll('.previews .preview').length).not.toEqual(0);
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('error getting file', () => {
-    beforeEach(done => {
-      endpoint = 'invalid/path/to/file.bmpr';
-
-      balsamiqViewer
-        .loadFile(endpoint)
-        .then(done.fail, null)
-        .catch(done);
-    });
-
-    it('does not show loading icon', () => {
-      expect(document.querySelector('.loading')).toBeNull();
-    });
-
-    it('does not render the balsamiq previews', () => {
-      expect(document.querySelectorAll('.previews .preview').length).toEqual(0);
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb
index 8d01a651651..c5e84a0c1e7 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ RSpec.describe Banzai::Filter::MarkdownFilter do
 
         expect(result).to start_with('<pre><code lang="日">')
       end
+
+      it 'works with additional language parameters' do
+        result = filter("```ruby:red gem\nsome code\n```", no_sourcepos: true)
+
+        expect(result).to start_with('<pre><code lang="ruby:red gem">')
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/extractors/graphql_extractor_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/extractors/graphql_extractor_spec.rb
index cde8e2d5c18..a7a19fb73fc 100644
--- a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/extractors/graphql_extractor_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/extractors/graphql_extractor_spec.rb
@@ -41,12 +41,11 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Common::Extractors::GraphqlExtractor do
     end
 
     context 'when variables are present' do
-      let(:query) { { query: double(to_s: 'test', variables: { full_path: :source_full_path }) } }
+      let(:variables) { { foo: :bar } }
+      let(:query) { { query: double(to_s: 'test', variables: variables) } }
 
       it 'builds graphql query variables for import entity' do
-        expected_variables = { full_path: import_entity.source_full_path }
-
-        expect(graphql_client).to receive(:execute).with(anything, expected_variables)
+        expect(graphql_client).to receive(:execute).with(anything, variables)
 
         subject.extract(context).first
       end
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/transformers/graphql_cleaner_transformer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/transformers/graphql_cleaner_transformer_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 8f39b6e7c93..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/transformers/graphql_cleaner_transformer_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-RSpec.describe BulkImports::Common::Transformers::GraphqlCleanerTransformer do
-  describe '#transform' do
-    let_it_be(:expected_output) do
-      {
-        'name' => 'test',
-        'fullName' => 'test',
-        'description' => 'test',
-        'labels' => [
-          { 'title' => 'label1' },
-          { 'title' => 'label2' },
-          { 'title' => 'label3' }
-        ]
-      }
-    end
-
-    it 'deep cleans hash from GraphQL keys' do
-      data = {
-        'data' => {
-          'group' => {
-            'name' => 'test',
-            'fullName' => 'test',
-            'description' => 'test',
-            'labels' => {
-              'edges' => [
-                { 'node' => { 'title' => 'label1' } },
-                { 'node' => { 'title' => 'label2' } },
-                { 'node' => { 'title' => 'label3' } }
-              ]
-            }
-          }
-        }
-      }
-
-      transformed_data = described_class.new.transform(nil, data)
-
-      expect(transformed_data).to eq(expected_output)
-    end
-
-    context 'when data does not have data/group nesting' do
-      it 'deep cleans hash from GraphQL keys' do
-        data = {
-          'name' => 'test',
-          'fullName' => 'test',
-          'description' => 'test',
-          'labels' => {
-            'edges' => [
-              { 'node' => { 'title' => 'label1' } },
-              { 'node' => { 'title' => 'label2' } },
-              { 'node' => { 'title' => 'label3' } }
-            ]
-          }
-        }
-
-        transformed_data = described_class.new.transform(nil, data)
-
-        expect(transformed_data).to eq(expected_output)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when data is not a hash' do
-      it 'does not perform transformation' do
-        data = 'test'
-
-        transformed_data = described_class.new.transform(nil, data)
-
-        expect(transformed_data).to eq(data)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when nested data is not an array or hash' do
-      it 'only removes top level data/group keys' do
-        data = {
-          'data' => {
-            'group' => 'test'
-          }
-        }
-
-        transformed_data = described_class.new.transform(nil, data)
-
-        expect(transformed_data).to eq('test')
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/transformers/hash_key_digger_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/transformers/hash_key_digger_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2b33701653e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/common/transformers/hash_key_digger_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe BulkImports::Common::Transformers::HashKeyDigger do
+  describe '#transform' do
+    it 'when the key_path is an array' do
+      data = { foo: { bar: :value } }
+      key_path = %i[foo bar]
+      transformed = described_class.new(key_path: key_path).transform(nil, data)
+
+      expect(transformed).to eq(:value)
+    end
+
+    it 'when the key_path is not an array' do
+      data = { foo: { bar: :value } }
+      key_path = :foo
+      transformed = described_class.new(key_path: key_path).transform(nil, data)
+
+      expect(transformed).to eq({ bar: :value })
+    end
+
+    it "when the data is not a hash" do
+      expect { described_class.new(key_path: nil).transform(nil, nil) }
+        .to raise_error(ArgumentError, "Given data must be a Hash")
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/group_pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/group_pipeline_spec.rb
index 3949dd23b49..a132e964141 100644
--- a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/group_pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/group_pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Groups::Pipelines::GroupPipeline do
 
   describe 'pipeline parts' do
     it { expect(described_class).to include_module(BulkImports::Pipeline) }
-    it { expect(described_class).to include_module(BulkImports::Pipeline::Attributes) }
     it { expect(described_class).to include_module(BulkImports::Pipeline::Runner) }
 
     it 'has extractors' do
@@ -90,13 +89,16 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Groups::Pipelines::GroupPipeline do
     it 'has transformers' do
       expect(described_class.transformers)
         .to contain_exactly(
-          { klass: BulkImports::Common::Transformers::GraphqlCleanerTransformer, options: nil },
+          { klass: BulkImports::Common::Transformers::HashKeyDigger, options: { key_path: %w[data group] } },
           { klass: BulkImports::Common::Transformers::UnderscorifyKeysTransformer, options: nil },
-          { klass: BulkImports::Groups::Transformers::GroupAttributesTransformer, options: nil })
+          { klass: BulkImports::Groups::Transformers::GroupAttributesTransformer, options: nil }
+        )
     end
 
     it 'has loaders' do
-      expect(described_class.loaders).to contain_exactly({ klass: BulkImports::Groups::Loaders::GroupLoader, options: nil })
+      expect(described_class.loaders).to contain_exactly({
+        klass: BulkImports::Groups::Loaders::GroupLoader, options: nil
+      })
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/subgroup_entities_pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/subgroup_entities_pipeline_spec.rb
index 60a4a796682..ace8eb4d9f6 100644
--- a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/subgroup_entities_pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/groups/pipelines/subgroup_entities_pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Groups::Pipelines::SubgroupEntitiesPipeline do
 
   describe 'pipeline parts' do
     it { expect(described_class).to include_module(BulkImports::Pipeline) }
-    it { expect(described_class).to include_module(BulkImports::Pipeline::Attributes) }
     it { expect(described_class).to include_module(BulkImports::Pipeline::Runner) }
 
     it 'has extractors' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/importers/group_importer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/importers/group_importer_spec.rb
index 95ac5925c97..7fec3b79179 100644
--- a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/importers/group_importer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/importers/group_importer_spec.rb
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Importers::GroupImporter do
   subject { described_class.new(bulk_import_entity) }
 
   before do
+    allow(Gitlab).to receive(:ee?).and_return(false)
     allow(BulkImports::Pipeline::Context).to receive(:new).and_return(context)
-    stub_http_requests
   end
 
   describe '#execute' do
@@ -39,18 +39,4 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Importers::GroupImporter do
       expect(pipeline).to receive(:run).with(context)
     end
   end
-
-  def stub_http_requests
-    double_response = double(
-      code: 200,
-      success?: true,
-      parsed_response: {},
-      headers: {}
-    )
-
-    allow_next_instance_of(BulkImports::Clients::Http) do |client|
-      allow(client).to receive(:get).and_return(double_response)
-      allow(client).to receive(:post).and_return(double_response)
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/pipeline/attributes_spec.rb b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/pipeline_spec.rb
index 54c5dbd4cae..ba7bcf8788f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/bulk_imports/pipeline/attributes_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/bulk_imports/pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe BulkImports::Pipeline::Attributes do
+RSpec.describe BulkImports::Pipeline do
   describe 'pipeline attributes' do
     before do
       stub_const('BulkImports::Extractor', Class.new)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Pipeline::Attributes do
       stub_const('BulkImports::Loader', Class.new)
 
       klass = Class.new do
-        include BulkImports::Pipeline::Attributes
+        include BulkImports::Pipeline
 
         extractor BulkImports::Extractor, { foo: :bar }
         transformer BulkImports::Transformer, { foo: :bar }
diff --git a/spec/lib/feature/definition_spec.rb b/spec/lib/feature/definition_spec.rb
index fa0207d829a..974310d8ea9 100644
--- a/spec/lib/feature/definition_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/feature/definition_spec.rb
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ RSpec.describe Feature::Definition do
 
   describe '.load_from_file' do
     it 'properly loads a definition from file' do
-      expect(File).to receive(:read).with(path) { yaml_content }
+      expect_file_read(path, content: yaml_content)
 
       expect(described_class.send(:load_from_file, path).attributes)
         .to eq(definition.attributes)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ RSpec.describe Feature::Definition do
 
     context 'for invalid definition' do
       it 'raises exception' do
-        expect(File).to receive(:read).with(path) { '{}' }
+        expect_file_read(path, content: '{}')
 
         expect do
           described_class.send(:load_from_file, path)
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bebb398413b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::UpdateExistingUsersThatRequireTwoFactorAuth, schema: 20201030121314 do
+  include MigrationHelpers::NamespacesHelpers
+
+  let(:group_with_2fa_parent) { create_namespace('parent', Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE) }
+  let(:group_with_2fa_child) { create_namespace('child', Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE, parent_id: group_with_2fa_parent.id) }
+  let(:members_table) { table(:members) }
+  let(:users_table) { table(:users) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new }
+
+  describe '#perform' do
+    context 'with group members' do
+      let(:user_1) { create_user('user@example.com') }
+      let!(:member) { create_group_member(user_1, group_with_2fa_parent) }
+      let!(:user_without_group) { create_user('user_without@example.com') }
+      let(:user_other) { create_user('user_other@example.com') }
+      let!(:member_other) { create_group_member(user_other, group_with_2fa_parent) }
+
+      it 'updates user when user should not be required to establish two factor authentication' do
+        subject.perform(user_1.id, user_without_group.id)
+
+        expect(user_1.reload.require_two_factor_authentication_from_group).to eq(false)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not update user when user is member of group that requires two factor authentication' do
+        group = create_namespace('other', Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE, require_two_factor_authentication: true)
+        create_group_member(user_1, group)
+
+        subject.perform(user_1.id, user_without_group.id)
+
+        expect(user_1.reload.require_two_factor_authentication_from_group).to eq(true)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not update user who is not in current batch' do
+        subject.perform(user_1.id, user_without_group.id)
+
+        expect(user_other.reload.require_two_factor_authentication_from_group).to eq(true)
+      end
+
+      it 'updates all users in current batch' do
+        subject.perform(user_1.id, user_other.id)
+
+        expect(user_other.reload.require_two_factor_authentication_from_group).to eq(false)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not update user when user is member of group which parent group requires two factor authentication' do
+        group_with_2fa_parent.update!(require_two_factor_authentication: true)
+        subject.perform(user_1.id, user_other.id)
+
+        expect(user_1.reload.require_two_factor_authentication_from_group).to eq(true)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not update user when user is member of group which has subgroup that requires two factor authentication' do
+        create_namespace('subgroup', Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE, require_two_factor_authentication: true, parent_id: group_with_2fa_child.id)
+
+        subject.perform(user_1.id, user_other.id)
+
+        expect(user_1.reload.require_two_factor_authentication_from_group).to eq(true)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  def create_user(email, require_2fa: true)
+    users_table.create!(email: email, projects_limit: 10, require_two_factor_authentication_from_group: require_2fa)
+  end
+
+  def create_group_member(user, group)
+    members_table.create!(user_id: user.id, source_id: group.id, access_level: GroupMember::MAINTAINER, source_type: "Namespace", type: "GroupMember", notification_level: 3)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/codequality/code_climate_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/codequality/code_climate_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c6b8cf2a985
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/codequality/code_climate_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Codequality::CodeClimate do
+  describe '#parse!' do
+    subject(:parse) { described_class.new.parse!(code_climate, codequality_report) }
+
+    let(:codequality_report) { Gitlab::Ci::Reports::CodequalityReports.new }
+    let(:code_climate) do
+      [
+        {
+          "categories": [
+            "Complexity"
+          ],
+          "check_name": "argument_count",
+          "content": {
+            "body": ""
+          },
+          "description": "Method `new_array` has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.",
+          "fingerprint": "15cdb5c53afd42bc22f8ca366a08d547",
+          "location": {
+            "path": "foo.rb",
+            "lines": {
+              "begin": 10,
+              "end": 10
+            }
+          },
+          "other_locations": [],
+          "remediation_points": 900000,
+          "severity": "major",
+          "type": "issue",
+          "engine_name": "structure"
+        }
+      ].to_json
+    end
+
+    context "when data is code_climate style JSON" do
+      context "when there are no degradations" do
+        let(:code_climate) { [].to_json }
+
+        it "returns a codequality report" do
+          expect { parse }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(codequality_report.degradations_count).to eq(0)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "when there are degradations" do
+        it "returns a codequality report" do
+          expect { parse }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(codequality_report.degradations_count).to eq(1)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when data is not a valid JSON string" do
+      let(:code_climate) do
+        [
+          {
+            "categories": [
+              "Complexity"
+            ],
+            "check_name": "argument_count",
+            "content": {
+              "body": ""
+            },
+            "description": "Method `new_array` has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.",
+            "fingerprint": "15cdb5c53afd42bc22f8ca366a08d547",
+            "location": {
+              "path": "foo.rb",
+              "lines": {
+                "begin": 10,
+                "end": 10
+              }
+            },
+            "other_locations": [],
+            "remediation_points": 900000,
+            "severity": "major",
+            "type": "issue",
+            "engine_name": "structure"
+          }
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it "sets error_message" do
+        expect { parse }.not_to raise_error
+
+        expect(codequality_report.error_message).to include('JSON parsing failed')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when degradations contain an invalid one' do
+      let(:code_climate) do
+        [
+          {
+          "type": "Issue",
+          "check_name": "Rubocop/Metrics/ParameterLists",
+          "description": "Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [12/5]",
+          "fingerprint": "ab5f8b935886b942d621399aefkaehfiaehf",
+          "severity": "minor"
+          },
+          {
+            "categories": [
+              "Complexity"
+            ],
+            "check_name": "argument_count",
+            "content": {
+              "body": ""
+            },
+            "description": "Method `new_array` has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.",
+            "fingerprint": "15cdb5c53afd42bc22f8ca366a08d547",
+            "location": {
+              "path": "foo.rb",
+              "lines": {
+                "begin": 10,
+                "end": 10
+              }
+            },
+            "other_locations": [],
+            "remediation_points": 900000,
+            "severity": "major",
+            "type": "issue",
+            "engine_name": "structure"
+          }
+        ].to_json
+      end
+
+      it 'stops parsing the report' do
+        expect { parse }.not_to raise_error
+
+        expect(codequality_report.degradations_count).to eq(0)
+        expect(codequality_report.error_message).to eq("Invalid degradation format: The property '#/' did not contain a required property of 'location'")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers_spec.rb
index db9a5775d9f..b932cd81272 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers_spec.rb
@@ -30,6 +30,14 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'when file_type is codequality' do
+      let(:file_type) { 'codequality' }
+
+      it 'fabricates the class' do
+        is_expected.to be_a(described_class::Codequality::CodeClimate)
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'when file_type is terraform' do
       let(:file_type) { 'terraform' }
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/reports/codequality_reports_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/reports/codequality_reports_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..44e67259369
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/reports/codequality_reports_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::Ci::Reports::CodequalityReports do
+  let(:codequality_report) { described_class.new }
+  let(:degradation_1) do
+    {
+      "categories": [
+        "Complexity"
+      ],
+      "check_name": "argument_count",
+      "content": {
+        "body": ""
+      },
+      "description": "Method `new_array` has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.",
+      "fingerprint": "15cdb5c53afd42bc22f8ca366a08d547",
+      "location": {
+        "path": "foo.rb",
+        "lines": {
+          "begin": 10,
+          "end": 10
+        }
+      },
+      "other_locations": [],
+      "remediation_points": 900000,
+      "severity": "major",
+      "type": "issue",
+      "engine_name": "structure"
+    }.with_indifferent_access
+  end
+
+  let(:degradation_2) do
+    {
+      "type": "Issue",
+      "check_name": "Rubocop/Metrics/ParameterLists",
+      "description": "Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [12/5]",
+      "categories": [
+        "Complexity"
+      ],
+      "remediation_points": 550000,
+      "location": {
+        "path": "foo.rb",
+        "positions": {
+          "begin": {
+            "column": 14,
+            "line": 10
+          },
+          "end": {
+            "column": 39,
+            "line": 10
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "content": {
+        "body": "This cop checks for methods with too many parameters.\nThe maximum number of parameters is configurable.\nKeyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count."
+      },
+      "engine_name": "rubocop",
+      "fingerprint": "ab5f8b935886b942d621399f5a2ca16e",
+      "severity": "minor"
+    }.with_indifferent_access
+  end
+
+  it { expect(codequality_report.degradations).to eq({}) }
+
+  describe '#add_degradation' do
+    context 'when there is a degradation' do
+      before do
+        codequality_report.add_degradation(degradation_1)
+      end
+
+      it 'adds degradation to codequality report' do
+        expect(codequality_report.degradations.keys).to eq([degradation_1[:fingerprint]])
+        expect(codequality_report.degradations.values.size).to eq(1)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a required property is missing in the degradation' do
+      let(:invalid_degradation) do
+        {
+          "type": "Issue",
+          "check_name": "Rubocop/Metrics/ParameterLists",
+          "description": "Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [12/5]",
+          "fingerprint": "ab5f8b935886b942d621399aefkaehfiaehf",
+          "severity": "minor"
+        }.with_indifferent_access
+      end
+
+      it 'sets location as an error' do
+        codequality_report.add_degradation(invalid_degradation)
+
+        expect(codequality_report.error_message).to eq("Invalid degradation format: The property '#/' did not contain a required property of 'location'")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#set_error_message' do
+    context 'when there is an error' do
+      it 'sets errors' do
+        codequality_report.set_error_message("error")
+
+        expect(codequality_report.error_message).to eq("error")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#degradations_count' do
+    subject(:degradations_count) { codequality_report.degradations_count }
+
+    context 'when there are many degradations' do
+      before do
+        codequality_report.add_degradation(degradation_1)
+        codequality_report.add_degradation(degradation_2)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the number of degradations' do
+        expect(degradations_count).to eq(2)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#all_degradations' do
+    subject(:all_degradations) { codequality_report.all_degradations }
+
+    context 'when there are many degradations' do
+      before do
+        codequality_report.add_degradation(degradation_1)
+        codequality_report.add_degradation(degradation_2)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns all degradations' do
+        expect(all_degradations).to contain_exactly(degradation_1, degradation_2)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb
index 05d744d95e2..a99bdcc9a0f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Cleanup::ProjectUploads do
   describe '#run!' do
     shared_examples_for 'moves the file' do
       shared_examples_for 'a real run' do
-        let(:args) { [dry_run: false] }
+        let(:args) { { dry_run: false } }
 
         it 'moves the file to its proper location' do
-          subject.run!(*args)
+          subject.run!(**args)
 
           expect(File.exist?(path)).to be_falsey
           expect(File.exist?(new_path)).to be_truthy
@@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Cleanup::ProjectUploads do
           expect(logger).to receive(:info).with("Looking for orphaned project uploads to clean up...")
           expect(logger).to receive(:info).with("Did #{action}")
 
-          subject.run!(*args)
+          subject.run!(**args)
         end
       end
 
       shared_examples_for 'a dry run' do
         it 'does not move the file' do
-          subject.run!(*args)
+          subject.run!(**args)
 
           expect(File.exist?(path)).to be_truthy
           expect(File.exist?(new_path)).to be_falsey
@@ -44,30 +44,30 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Cleanup::ProjectUploads do
           expect(logger).to receive(:info).with("Looking for orphaned project uploads to clean up. Dry run...")
           expect(logger).to receive(:info).with("Can #{action}")
 
-          subject.run!(*args)
+          subject.run!(**args)
         end
       end
 
       context 'when dry_run is false' do
-        let(:args) { [dry_run: false] }
+        let(:args) { { dry_run: false } }
 
         it_behaves_like 'a real run'
       end
 
       context 'when dry_run is nil' do
-        let(:args) { [dry_run: nil] }
+        let(:args) { { dry_run: nil } }
 
         it_behaves_like 'a real run'
       end
 
       context 'when dry_run is true' do
-        let(:args) { [dry_run: true] }
+        let(:args) { { dry_run: true } }
 
         it_behaves_like 'a dry run'
       end
 
       context 'with dry_run not specified' do
-        let(:args) { [] }
+        let(:args) { {} }
 
         it_behaves_like 'a dry run'
       end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/database/batch_count_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/batch_count_spec.rb
index a1cc759e011..29688b18e94 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/database/batch_count_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/batch_count_spec.rb
@@ -130,6 +130,16 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Database::BatchCount do
       expect(described_class.batch_count(model, start: model.minimum(:id), finish: model.maximum(:id))).to eq(5)
     end
 
+    it 'stops counting when finish value is reached' do
+      stub_const('Gitlab::Database::BatchCounter::MIN_REQUIRED_BATCH_SIZE', 0)
+
+      expect(described_class.batch_count(model,
+        start: model.minimum(:id),
+        finish: model.maximum(:id) - 1, # Do not count the last record
+        batch_size: model.count - 2 # Ensure there are multiple batches
+      )).to eq(model.count - 1)
+    end
+
     it "defaults the batch size to #{Gitlab::Database::BatchCounter::DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE}" do
       min_id = model.minimum(:id)
       relation = instance_double(ActiveRecord::Relation)
@@ -242,6 +252,19 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Database::BatchCount do
       expect(described_class.batch_distinct_count(model, column, start: model.minimum(column), finish: model.maximum(column))).to eq(2)
     end
 
+    it 'stops counting when finish value is reached' do
+      # Create a new unique author that should not be counted
+      create(:issue)
+
+      stub_const('Gitlab::Database::BatchCounter::MIN_REQUIRED_BATCH_SIZE', 0)
+
+      expect(described_class.batch_distinct_count(model, column,
+        start: User.minimum(:id),
+        finish: User.maximum(:id) - 1, # Do not count the newly created issue
+        batch_size: model.count - 2 # Ensure there are multiple batches
+      )).to eq(2)
+    end
+
     it 'counts with User min and max as start and finish' do
       expect(described_class.batch_distinct_count(model, column, start: User.minimum(:id), finish: User.maximum(:id))).to eq(2)
     end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/database/migrations/background_migration_helpers_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/migrations/background_migration_helpers_spec.rb
index 48132d68031..3e8563376ce 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/database/migrations/background_migration_helpers_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/migrations/background_migration_helpers_spec.rb
@@ -189,7 +189,51 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Database::Migrations::BackgroundMigrationHelpers do
       end
     end
 
-    context "when the model doesn't have an ID column" do
+    context 'when the model specifies a primary_column_name' do
+      let!(:id1) { create(:container_expiration_policy).id }
+      let!(:id2) { create(:container_expiration_policy).id }
+      let!(:id3) { create(:container_expiration_policy).id }
+
+      around do |example|
+        freeze_time { example.run }
+      end
+
+      before do
+        ContainerExpirationPolicy.class_eval do
+          include EachBatch
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the final expected delay', :aggregate_failures do
+        Sidekiq::Testing.fake! do
+          final_delay = model.queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range_at_intervals(ContainerExpirationPolicy, 'FooJob', 10.minutes, batch_size: 2, primary_column_name: :project_id)
+
+          expect(final_delay.to_f).to eq(20.minutes.to_f)
+          expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs[0]['args']).to eq(['FooJob', [id1, id2]])
+          expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs[0]['at']).to eq(10.minutes.from_now.to_f)
+          expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs[1]['args']).to eq(['FooJob', [id3, id3]])
+          expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs[1]['at']).to eq(20.minutes.from_now.to_f)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "when the primary_column_name is not an integer" do
+        it 'raises error' do
+          expect do
+            model.queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range_at_intervals(ContainerExpirationPolicy, 'FooJob', 10.minutes, primary_column_name: :enabled)
+          end.to raise_error(StandardError, /is not an integer column/)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "when the primary_column_name does not exist" do
+        it 'raises error' do
+          expect do
+            model.queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range_at_intervals(ContainerExpirationPolicy, 'FooJob', 10.minutes, primary_column_name: :foo)
+          end.to raise_error(StandardError, /does not have an ID column of foo/)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when the model doesn't have an ID or primary_column_name column" do
       it 'raises error (for now)' do
         expect do
           model.queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range_at_intervals(ProjectAuthorization, 'FooJob', 10.seconds)
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/database/postgres_hll_batch_distinct_counter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/postgres_hll_batch_distinct_counter_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5da86538297
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/postgres_hll_batch_distinct_counter_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::Database::PostgresHllBatchDistinctCounter do
+  let_it_be(:error_rate) { 4.9 } # HyperLogLog is a probabilistic algorithm, which provides estimated data, with given error margin
+  let_it_be(:fallback) { ::Gitlab::Database::BatchCounter::FALLBACK }
+  let_it_be(:small_batch_size) { calculate_batch_size(::Gitlab::Database::BatchCounter::MIN_REQUIRED_BATCH_SIZE) }
+  let(:model) { Issue }
+  let(:column) { :author_id }
+
+  let(:in_transaction) { false }
+
+  let_it_be(:user) { create(:user, email: 'email1@domain.com') }
+  let_it_be(:another_user) { create(:user, email: 'email2@domain.com') }
+
+  def calculate_batch_size(batch_size)
+    zero_offset_modifier = -1
+
+    batch_size + zero_offset_modifier
+  end
+
+  before do
+    allow(ActiveRecord::Base.connection).to receive(:transaction_open?).and_return(in_transaction)
+  end
+
+  context 'different distribution of relation records' do
+    [10, 100, 100_000].each do |spread|
+      context "records are spread within #{spread}" do
+        before do
+          ids = (1..spread).to_a.sample(10)
+          create_list(:issue, 10).each_with_index do |issue, i|
+            issue.id = ids[i]
+          end
+        end
+
+        it 'counts table' do
+          expect(described_class.new(model).estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(10)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'unit test for different counting parameters' do
+    before_all do
+      create_list(:issue, 3, author: user)
+      create_list(:issue, 2, author: another_user)
+    end
+
+    describe '#estimate_distinct_count' do
+      it 'counts table' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model).estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(5)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with column field' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(2)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with :id field' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, :id).estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(5)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with "id" field' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, "id").estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(5)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with table.column field' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, "#{model.table_name}.#{column}").estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(2)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with Arel column' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, model.arel_table[column]).estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(2)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts over joined relations' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model.joins(:author), "users.email").estimate_distinct_count).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(2)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with :column field with batch_size of 50K' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count(batch_size: 50_000)).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(2)
+      end
+
+      it 'will not count table with a batch size less than allowed' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count(batch_size: small_batch_size)).to eq(fallback)
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with different number of batches and aggregates total result' do
+        stub_const('Gitlab::Database::PostgresHllBatchDistinctCounter::MIN_REQUIRED_BATCH_SIZE', 0)
+
+        [1, 2, 4, 5, 6].each { |i| expect(described_class.new(model).estimate_distinct_count(batch_size: i)).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(5) }
+      end
+
+      it 'counts with a start and finish' do
+        expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count(start: model.minimum(:id), finish: model.maximum(:id))).to be_within(error_rate).percent_of(2)
+      end
+
+      it "defaults the batch size to #{Gitlab::Database::PostgresHllBatchDistinctCounter::DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE}" do
+        min_id = model.minimum(:id)
+        batch_end_id = min_id + calculate_batch_size(Gitlab::Database::PostgresHllBatchDistinctCounter::DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE)
+
+        expect(model).to receive(:where).with("id" => min_id..batch_end_id).and_call_original
+
+        described_class.new(model).estimate_distinct_count
+      end
+
+      context 'when a transaction is open' do
+        let(:in_transaction) { true }
+
+        it 'raises an error' do
+          expect { described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count }.to raise_error('BatchCount can not be run inside a transaction')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'disallowed configurations' do
+        let(:default_batch_size) { Gitlab::Database::PostgresHllBatchDistinctCounter::DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE }
+
+        it 'returns fallback if start is bigger than finish' do
+          expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count(start: 1, finish: 0)).to eq(fallback)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns fallback if loops more than allowed' do
+          large_finish = Gitlab::Database::PostgresHllBatchDistinctCounter::MAX_ALLOWED_LOOPS * default_batch_size + 1
+          expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count(start: 1, finish: large_finish)).to eq(fallback)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns fallback if batch size is less than min required' do
+          expect(described_class.new(model, column).estimate_distinct_count(batch_size: small_batch_size)).to eq(fallback)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/smime/certificate_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/smime/certificate_spec.rb
index e4a085d971b..f7bb933e348 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/smime/certificate_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/smime/certificate_spec.rb
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Email::Smime::Certificate do
 
   describe '.from_files' do
     it 'parses correctly a certificate and key' do
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_key').and_return(@cert[:key].to_s)
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_cert').and_return(@cert[:cert].to_pem)
+      stub_file_read('a_key', content: @cert[:key].to_s)
+      stub_file_read('a_cert', content: @cert[:cert].to_pem)
 
       parsed_cert = described_class.from_files('a_key', 'a_cert')
 
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Email::Smime::Certificate do
 
     context 'with optional ca_certs' do
       it 'parses correctly certificate, key and ca_certs' do
-        allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_key').and_return(@cert[:key].to_s)
-        allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_cert').and_return(@cert[:cert].to_pem)
-        allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_ca_cert').and_return(@intermediate_ca[:cert].to_pem)
+        stub_file_read('a_key', content: @cert[:key].to_s)
+        stub_file_read('a_cert', content: @cert[:cert].to_pem)
+        stub_file_read('a_ca_cert', content: @intermediate_ca[:cert].to_pem)
 
         parsed_cert = described_class.from_files('a_key', 'a_cert', 'a_ca_cert')
 
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Email::Smime::Certificate do
     it 'parses correctly a certificate and key' do
       cert = generate_cert(signer_ca: @root_ca)
 
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_key').and_return(cert[:key].to_s)
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with('a_cert').and_return(cert[:cert].to_pem)
+      stub_file_read('a_key', content: cert[:key].to_s)
+      stub_file_read('a_cert', content: cert[:cert].to_pem)
 
       parsed_cert = described_class.from_files('a_key', 'a_cert')
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/controller_concern_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/controller_concern_spec.rb
index 2fe3d36daf7..047b4e7458e 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/controller_concern_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/controller_concern_spec.rb
@@ -6,12 +6,10 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation::ControllerConcern, type: :controller do
   before do
     stub_const('Gitlab::Experimentation::EXPERIMENTS', {
         backwards_compatible_test_experiment: {
-          environment: environment,
           tracking_category: 'Team',
           use_backwards_compatible_subject_index: true
         },
         test_experiment: {
-          environment: environment,
           tracking_category: 'Team'
         }
       }
@@ -21,7 +19,6 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation::ControllerConcern, type: :controller do
     Feature.enable_percentage_of_time(:test_experiment_experiment_percentage, enabled_percentage)
   end
 
-  let(:environment) { Rails.env.test? }
   let(:enabled_percentage) { 10 }
 
   controller(ApplicationController) do
@@ -391,10 +388,8 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation::ControllerConcern, type: :controller do
 
     context 'do not track' do
       before do
+        stub_experiment(test_experiment: true)
         allow(controller).to receive(:current_user).and_return(user)
-        allow_next_instance_of(described_class) do |instance|
-          allow(instance).to receive(:experiment_enabled?).with(:test_experiment).and_return(false)
-        end
       end
 
       context 'is disabled' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/experiment_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/experiment_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4af76e9e920
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation/experiment_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation::Experiment do
+  using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+  let(:percentage) { 50 }
+  let(:params) do
+    {
+      tracking_category: 'Category1',
+      use_backwards_compatible_subject_index: true
+    }
+  end
+
+  before do
+    feature = double('FeatureFlag', percentage_of_time_value: percentage )
+    expect(Feature).to receive(:get).with(:experiment_key_experiment_percentage).and_return(feature)
+  end
+
+  subject(:experiment) { described_class.new(:experiment_key, **params) }
+
+  describe '#enabled?' do
+    before do
+      allow(Gitlab).to receive(:dev_env_or_com?).and_return(on_gitlab_com)
+    end
+
+    subject { experiment.enabled? }
+
+    where(:on_gitlab_com, :percentage, :is_enabled) do
+      true  | 0  | false
+      true  | 10 | true
+      false | 0  | false
+      false | 10 | false
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      it { is_expected.to eq(is_enabled) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#enabled_for_index?' do
+    subject { experiment.enabled_for_index?(index) }
+
+    where(:index, :percentage, :is_enabled) do
+      50  | 40 | false
+      40  | 50 | true
+      nil | 50 | false
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      it { is_expected.to eq(is_enabled) }
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation_spec.rb
index ebf98a0151f..4130d5f9184 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/experimentation_spec.rb
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation::EXPERIMENTS do
       :invite_members_version_a,
       :invite_members_version_b,
       :invite_members_empty_group_version_a,
-      :new_create_project_ui,
       :contact_sales_btn_in_app,
       :customize_homepage,
       :invite_email,
@@ -33,27 +32,25 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation, :snowplow do
   before do
     stub_const('Gitlab::Experimentation::EXPERIMENTS', {
       backwards_compatible_test_experiment: {
-        environment: environment,
         tracking_category: 'Team',
         use_backwards_compatible_subject_index: true
       },
       test_experiment: {
-        environment: environment,
         tracking_category: 'Team'
       }
     })
 
     Feature.enable_percentage_of_time(:backwards_compatible_test_experiment_experiment_percentage, enabled_percentage)
     Feature.enable_percentage_of_time(:test_experiment_experiment_percentage, enabled_percentage)
+    allow(Gitlab).to receive(:com?).and_return(true)
   end
 
-  let(:environment) { Rails.env.test? }
   let(:enabled_percentage) { 10 }
 
   describe '.enabled?' do
     subject { described_class.enabled?(:test_experiment) }
 
-    context 'feature toggle is enabled, we are on the right environment and we are selected' do
+    context 'feature toggle is enabled and we are selected' do
       it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
     end
 
@@ -68,20 +65,6 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Experimentation, :snowplow do
 
       it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
     end
-
-    describe 'we are on the wrong environment' do
-      let(:environment) { ::Gitlab.com? }
-
-      it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
-
-      it 'ensures the typically less expensive environment is checked before the more expensive call to database for Feature' do
-        expect_next_instance_of(described_class::Experiment) do |experiment|
-          expect(experiment).not_to receive(:enabled?)
-        end
-
-        subject
-      end
-    end
   end
 
   describe '.enabled_for_value?' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb
index b09bd9dff1b..36f7d89dd0f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::CommitService do
       end
 
       it 'sends an RPC request with the correct payload' do
-        expect(client.commits_by_message(query, options)).to match_array(wrap_commits(commits))
+        expect(client.commits_by_message(query, **options)).to match_array(wrap_commits(commits))
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client_spec.rb
index 16dd2bbee6d..7fcb11c4dfd 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client_spec.rb
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::GitalyClient do
   describe '.filesystem_id_from_disk' do
     it 'catches errors' do
       [Errno::ENOENT, Errno::EACCES, JSON::ParserError].each do |error|
-        allow(File).to receive(:read).with(described_class.storage_metadata_file_path('default')).and_raise(error)
+        stub_file_read(described_class.storage_metadata_file_path('default'), error: error)
 
         expect(described_class.filesystem_id_from_disk('default')).to be_nil
       end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gpg_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gpg_spec.rb
index 72c6c8efb5e..66ce2d5cb8a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gpg_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gpg_spec.rb
@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Gpg do
     end
 
     it 'keeps track of created and removed keychains in counters' do
+      # Gitlab::Gpg may be memoizing stale counters if a preceding spec resets the Prometheus registry
+      # https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/286874
+      described_class.remove_instance_variable(:@tmp_keychains_created)
+      described_class.remove_instance_variable(:@tmp_keychains_removed)
+
       created = Gitlab::Metrics.counter(:gpg_tmp_keychains_created_total, 'The number of temporary GPG keychains')
       removed = Gitlab::Metrics.counter(:gpg_tmp_keychains_removed_total, 'The number of temporary GPG keychains')
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/array_connection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/array_connection_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..03cf53bb990
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/array_connection_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe ::Gitlab::Graphql::Pagination::ArrayConnection do
+  let(:nodes) { (1..10) }
+
+  subject(:connection) { described_class.new(nodes, max_page_size: 100) }
+
+  it_behaves_like 'a connection with collection methods'
+
+  it_behaves_like 'a redactable connection' do
+    let(:unwanted) { 5 }
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/externally_paginated_array_connection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/externally_paginated_array_connection_spec.rb
index 932bcd8cd92..84e8f8b95e8 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/externally_paginated_array_connection_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/externally_paginated_array_connection_spec.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Graphql::Pagination::ExternallyPaginatedArrayConnection d
     described_class.new(all_nodes, { max_page_size: values.size }.merge(arguments))
   end
 
+  it_behaves_like 'a connection with collection methods'
+
+  it_behaves_like 'a redactable connection' do
+    let(:unwanted) { 3 }
+  end
+
   describe '#nodes' do
     let(:paged_nodes) { connection.nodes }
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/keyset/connection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/keyset/connection_spec.rb
index c8f368b15fc..1fee24bdc1f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/keyset/connection_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/keyset/connection_spec.rb
@@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Graphql::Pagination::Keyset::Connection do
     Gitlab::Json.parse(Base64Bp.urlsafe_decode64(cursor))
   end
 
+  it_behaves_like 'a connection with collection methods'
+
+  it_behaves_like 'a redactable connection' do
+    let_it_be(:projects) { create_list(:project, 2) }
+    let(:unwanted) { projects.second }
+  end
+
   describe '#cursor_for' do
     let(:project) { create(:project) }
     let(:cursor)  { connection.cursor_for(project) }
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/offset_active_record_relation_connection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/offset_active_record_relation_connection_spec.rb
index 86f35de94ed..1ca7c1c3c69 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/offset_active_record_relation_connection_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/graphql/pagination/offset_active_record_relation_connection_spec.rb
@@ -6,4 +6,15 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Graphql::Pagination::OffsetActiveRecordRelationConnection
   it 'subclasses from GraphQL::Relay::RelationConnection' do
     expect(described_class.superclass).to eq GraphQL::Pagination::ActiveRecordRelationConnection
   end
+
+  it_behaves_like 'a connection with collection methods' do
+    let(:connection) { described_class.new(Project.all) }
+  end
+
+  it_behaves_like 'a redactable connection' do
+    let_it_be(:users) { create_list(:user, 2) }
+
+    let(:connection) { described_class.new(User.all, max_page_size: 10) }
+    let(:unwanted) { users.second }
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml
index 38fe2781331..c60f916add9 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ issues:
 - events
 - merge_requests_closing_issues
 - metrics
+- metric_images
 - timelogs
 - issuable_severity
 - issuable_sla
@@ -552,6 +553,8 @@ project:
 - pipeline_artifacts
 - terraform_states
 - alert_management_http_integrations
+- exported_protected_branches
+- incident_management_oncall_schedules
 award_emoji:
 - awardable
 - user
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/v2/reset_command_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/v2/reset_command_spec.rb
index 9e580cea397..2a3a4cec2b0 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/v2/reset_command_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/v2/reset_command_spec.rb
@@ -12,32 +12,14 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::V2::ResetCommand do
   it_behaves_like 'helm command generator' do
     let(:commands) do
       <<~EOS
-      helm reset
-      kubectl delete replicaset -n gitlab-managed-apps -l name\\=tiller
-      kubectl delete clusterrolebinding tiller-admin
+      export HELM_HOST="localhost:44134"
+      tiller -listen ${HELM_HOST} -alsologtostderr &
+      helm init --client-only
+      helm reset --force
       EOS
     end
   end
 
-  context 'when there is a ca.pem file' do
-    let(:files) { { 'ca.pem': 'some file content' } }
-
-    it_behaves_like 'helm command generator' do
-      let(:commands) do
-        <<~EOS1.squish + "\n" + <<~EOS2
-        helm reset
-        --tls
-        --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/helm/config/ca.pem
-        --tls-cert /data/helm/helm/config/cert.pem
-        --tls-key /data/helm/helm/config/key.pem
-        EOS1
-          kubectl delete replicaset -n gitlab-managed-apps -l name\\=tiller
-          kubectl delete clusterrolebinding tiller-admin
-        EOS2
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#pod_name' do
     subject { reset_command.pod_name }
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/rack_attack_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/rack_attack_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ac24bdf3a62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/rack_attack_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::RackAttack, :aggregate_failures do
+  describe '.configure' do
+    let(:fake_rack_attack) { class_double("Rack::Attack") }
+    let(:fake_rack_attack_request) { class_double("Rack::Attack::Request") }
+
+    let(:throttles) do
+      {
+        throttle_unauthenticated: Gitlab::Throttle.unauthenticated_options,
+        throttle_authenticated_api: Gitlab::Throttle.authenticated_api_options,
+        throttle_product_analytics_collector: { limit: 100, period: 60 },
+        throttle_unauthenticated_protected_paths: Gitlab::Throttle.unauthenticated_options,
+        throttle_authenticated_protected_paths_api: Gitlab::Throttle.authenticated_api_options,
+        throttle_authenticated_protected_paths_web: Gitlab::Throttle.authenticated_web_options
+      }
+    end
+
+    before do
+      stub_const("Rack::Attack", fake_rack_attack)
+      stub_const("Rack::Attack::Request", fake_rack_attack_request)
+
+      allow(fake_rack_attack).to receive(:throttle)
+      allow(fake_rack_attack).to receive(:track)
+      allow(fake_rack_attack).to receive(:safelist)
+      allow(fake_rack_attack).to receive(:blocklist)
+    end
+
+    it 'extends the request class' do
+      described_class.configure(fake_rack_attack)
+
+      expect(fake_rack_attack_request).to include(described_class::Request)
+    end
+
+    it 'configures the safelist' do
+      described_class.configure(fake_rack_attack)
+
+      expect(fake_rack_attack).to have_received(:safelist).with('throttle_bypass_header')
+    end
+
+    it 'configures throttles if no dry-run was configured' do
+      described_class.configure(fake_rack_attack)
+
+      throttles.each do |throttle, options|
+        expect(fake_rack_attack).to have_received(:throttle).with(throttle.to_s, options)
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'configures tracks if dry-run was configured for all throttles' do
+      stub_env('GITLAB_THROTTLE_DRY_RUN', '*')
+
+      described_class.configure(fake_rack_attack)
+
+      throttles.each do |throttle, options|
+        expect(fake_rack_attack).to have_received(:track).with(throttle.to_s, options)
+      end
+      expect(fake_rack_attack).not_to have_received(:throttle)
+    end
+
+    it 'configures tracks and throttles with a selected set of dry-runs' do
+      dry_run_throttles = throttles.each_key.first(2)
+      regular_throttles = throttles.keys[2..-1]
+      stub_env('GITLAB_THROTTLE_DRY_RUN', dry_run_throttles.join(','))
+
+      described_class.configure(fake_rack_attack)
+
+      dry_run_throttles.each do |throttle|
+        expect(fake_rack_attack).to have_received(:track).with(throttle.to_s, throttles[throttle])
+      end
+      regular_throttles.each do |throttle|
+        expect(fake_rack_attack).to have_received(:throttle).with(throttle.to_s, throttles[throttle])
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/product_analytics_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/product_analytics_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..63e2e930acd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/product_analytics_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::ProductAnalytics do
+  let(:emitter) { SnowplowTracker::Emitter.new('localhost', buffer_size: 1) }
+  let(:tracker) { SnowplowTracker::Tracker.new(emitter, SnowplowTracker::Subject.new, 'namespace', 'app_id') }
+
+  describe '#event' do
+    shared_examples 'does not send an event' do
+      it 'does not send an event' do
+        expect_any_instance_of(SnowplowTracker::Tracker).not_to receive(:track_struct_event)
+
+        subject.event(allowed_category, allowed_action)
+      end
+    end
+
+    let(:allowed_category) { 'epics' }
+    let(:allowed_action) { 'promote' }
+    let(:self_monitoring_project) { create(:project) }
+
+    before do
+      stub_feature_flags(product_analytics_tracking: true)
+      stub_application_setting(self_monitoring_project_id: self_monitoring_project.id)
+      stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: true)
+    end
+
+    context 'with allowed event' do
+      it 'sends an event to Product Analytics snowplow collector' do
+        expect(SnowplowTracker::AsyncEmitter)
+          .to receive(:new)
+          .with(ProductAnalytics::Tracker::COLLECTOR_URL, protocol: Gitlab.config.gitlab.protocol)
+          .and_return(emitter)
+
+        expect(SnowplowTracker::Tracker)
+          .to receive(:new)
+          .with(emitter, an_instance_of(SnowplowTracker::Subject), Gitlab::Tracking::SNOWPLOW_NAMESPACE, self_monitoring_project.id.to_s)
+          .and_return(tracker)
+
+        freeze_time do
+          expect(tracker)
+            .to receive(:track_struct_event)
+            .with(allowed_category, allowed_action, 'label', 'property', 1.5, nil, (Time.now.to_f * 1000).to_i)
+
+          subject.event(allowed_category, allowed_action, label: 'label', property: 'property', value: 1.5)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with non-allowed event' do
+      it 'does not send an event' do
+        expect_any_instance_of(SnowplowTracker::Tracker).not_to receive(:track_struct_event)
+
+        subject.event('category', 'action')
+        subject.event(allowed_category, 'action')
+        subject.event('category', allowed_action)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when self-monitoring project does not exist' do
+      before do
+        stub_application_setting(self_monitoring_project_id: nil)
+      end
+
+      include_examples 'does not send an event'
+    end
+
+    context 'when product_analytics_tracking FF is disabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_feature_flags(product_analytics_tracking: false)
+      end
+
+      include_examples 'does not send an event'
+    end
+
+    context 'when usage ping is disabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: false)
+      end
+
+      include_examples 'does not send an event'
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/snowplow_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/snowplow_spec.rb
index ee63eb6de04..7de23cd9621 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/snowplow_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking/destinations/snowplow_spec.rb
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::Snowplow do
       it 'sends event to tracker' do
         allow(tracker).to receive(:track_self_describing_event).and_call_original
 
-        subject.self_describing_event('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', foo: 'bar')
+        subject.self_describing_event('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', { foo: 'bar' })
 
         expect(tracker).to have_received(:track_self_describing_event) do |event, context, timestamp|
           expect(event.to_json[:schema]).to eq('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0')
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::Snowplow do
       it 'does not send event to tracker' do
         expect_any_instance_of(SnowplowTracker::Tracker).not_to receive(:track_self_describing_event)
 
-        subject.self_describing_event('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', foo: 'bar')
+        subject.self_describing_event('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', { foo: 'bar' })
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking_spec.rb
index 805bd92fd43..8efd4d4b848 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/tracking_spec.rb
@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Tracking do
   end
 
   describe '.event' do
+    before do
+      allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::Snowplow).to receive(:event)
+      allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::ProductAnalytics).to receive(:event)
+    end
+
     it 'delegates to snowplow destination' do
       expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::Snowplow)
         .to receive(:event)
@@ -43,6 +48,14 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Tracking do
 
       described_class.event('category', 'action', label: 'label', property: 'property', value: 1.5)
     end
+
+    it 'delegates to ProductAnalytics destination' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::ProductAnalytics)
+        .to receive(:event)
+        .with('category', 'action', label: 'label', property: 'property', value: 1.5, context: nil)
+
+      described_class.event('category', 'action', label: 'label', property: 'property', value: 1.5)
+    end
   end
 
   describe '.self_describing_event' do
@@ -51,7 +64,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Tracking do
         .to receive(:self_describing_event)
         .with('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', { foo: 'bar' }, context: nil)
 
-      described_class.self_describing_event('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', foo: 'bar')
+      described_class.self_describing_event('iglu:com.gitlab/foo/jsonschema/1-0-0', { foo: 'bar' })
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/aggregated_metrics_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/aggregated_metrics_spec.rb
index e9fb5346eae..c0deb2aa00c 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/aggregated_metrics_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/aggregated_metrics_spec.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'aggregated metrics' do
       Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.known_event?(event)
     end
 
-    failure_message do
+    failure_message do |event|
       "Event with name: `#{event}` can not be found within `#{Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter::KNOWN_EVENTS_PATH}`"
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/base_counter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/base_counter_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4a31191d75f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/base_counter_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::BaseCounter do
+  describe '.fetch_supported_event' do
+    subject { described_class.fetch_supported_event(event_name) }
+
+    let(:event_name) { 'generic_event' }
+    let(:prefix) { 'generic' }
+    let(:known_events) { %w[event another_event] }
+
+    before do
+      allow(described_class).to receive(:prefix) { prefix }
+      allow(described_class).to receive(:known_events) { known_events }
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the matching event' do
+      is_expected.to eq 'event'
+    end
+
+    context 'when event is unknown' do
+      let(:event_name) { 'generic_unknown_event' }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_nil }
+    end
+
+    context 'when prefix does not match the event name' do
+      let(:prefix) { 'special' }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_nil }
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/hll_redis_counter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/hll_redis_counter_spec.rb
index 93704a39555..579fc048663 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/hll_redis_counter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/hll_redis_counter_spec.rb
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter, :clean_gitlab_redis_s
         'search',
         'source_code',
         'incident_management',
+        'incident_management_alerts',
         'testing',
         'issues_edit',
         'ci_secrets_management',
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/search_counter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/search_counter_spec.rb
index b55e20ba555..17188a75ccb 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/search_counter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters/search_counter_spec.rb
@@ -20,4 +20,12 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::SearchCounter, :clean_gitlab_redis_sha
   context 'navbar_searches counter' do
     it_behaves_like 'usage counter with totals', :navbar_searches
   end
+
+  describe '.fetch_supported_event' do
+    subject { described_class.fetch_supported_event(event_name) }
+
+    let(:event_name) { 'all_searches' }
+
+    it { is_expected.to eq 'all_searches' }
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..379a2cb778d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_counters_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::UsageDataCounters do
+  describe '.usage_data_counters' do
+    subject { described_class.counters }
+
+    it { is_expected.to all(respond_to :totals) }
+    it { is_expected.to all(respond_to :fallback_totals) }
+  end
+
+  describe '.count' do
+    subject { described_class.count(event_name) }
+
+    let(:event_name) { 'static_site_editor_views' }
+
+    it 'increases a view counter' do
+      expect(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::StaticSiteEditorCounter).to receive(:count).with('views')
+
+      subject
+    end
+
+    context 'when event_name is not defined' do
+      let(:event_name) { 'unknown' }
+
+      it 'raises an exception' do
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::UnknownEvent)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb
index d305b2c5bfe..746c2aef7e5 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::UsageData, :aggregate_failures do
     subject { described_class.redis_hll_counters }
 
     let(:categories) { ::Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.categories }
-    let(:ineligible_total_categories) { %w[source_code testing ci_secrets_management] }
+    let(:ineligible_total_categories) { %w[source_code testing ci_secrets_management incident_management_alerts] }
 
     it 'has all known_events' do
       expect(subject).to have_key(:redis_hll_counters)
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/webpack/manifest_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/webpack/manifest_spec.rb
index 1427bdd7d4f..08b4774dd67 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/webpack/manifest_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/webpack/manifest_spec.rb
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Webpack::Manifest do
   context "with dev server disabled" do
     before do
       allow(Gitlab.config.webpack.dev_server).to receive(:enabled).and_return(false)
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with(::Rails.root.join("manifest_output/my_manifest.json")).and_return(manifest)
+      stub_file_read(::Rails.root.join("manifest_output/my_manifest.json"), content: manifest)
     end
 
     describe ".asset_paths" do
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Webpack::Manifest do
 
       it "errors if we can't find the manifest" do
         allow(Gitlab.config.webpack).to receive(:manifest_filename).and_return('broken.json')
-        allow(File).to receive(:read).with(::Rails.root.join("manifest_output/broken.json")).and_raise(Errno::ENOENT)
+        stub_file_read(::Rails.root.join("manifest_output/broken.json"), error: Errno::ENOENT)
         expect { Gitlab::Webpack::Manifest.asset_paths("entry1") }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Webpack::Manifest::ManifestLoadError)
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab_spec.rb
index 7c2758bf27e..eaab39291b2 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab_spec.rb
@@ -26,18 +26,17 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab do
       end
 
       it 'returns the actual Git revision' do
-        expect(File).to receive(:read)
-                          .with(described_class.root.join('REVISION'))
-                          .and_return("abc123\n")
+        expect_file_read(described_class.root.join('REVISION'), content: "abc123\n")
 
         expect(described_class.revision).to eq('abc123')
       end
 
       it 'memoizes the revision' do
+        stub_file_read(described_class.root.join('REVISION'), content: "abc123\n")
+
         expect(File).to receive(:read)
-                          .once
-                          .with(described_class.root.join('REVISION'))
-                          .and_return("abc123\n")
+          .once
+          .with(described_class.root.join('REVISION'))
 
         2.times { described_class.revision }
       end
diff --git a/spec/lib/microsoft_teams/notifier_spec.rb b/spec/lib/microsoft_teams/notifier_spec.rb
index c35d7e8420c..3b7892334dd 100644
--- a/spec/lib/microsoft_teams/notifier_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/microsoft_teams/notifier_spec.rb
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@ RSpec.describe MicrosoftTeams::Notifier do
 
   describe '#body' do
     it 'returns Markdown-based body when HTML was passed' do
-      expect(subject.send(:body, options)).to eq(body.to_json)
+      expect(subject.send(:body, **options)).to eq(body.to_json)
     end
 
     it 'fails when empty Hash was passed' do
-      expect { subject.send(:body, {}) }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
+      expect { subject.send(:body, **{}) }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/product_analytics/tracker_spec.rb b/spec/lib/product_analytics/tracker_spec.rb
index 0d0660235f1..52470c9c039 100644
--- a/spec/lib/product_analytics/tracker_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/product_analytics/tracker_spec.rb
@@ -5,53 +5,4 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 RSpec.describe ProductAnalytics::Tracker do
   it { expect(described_class::URL).to eq('http://localhost/-/sp.js') }
   it { expect(described_class::COLLECTOR_URL).to eq('localhost/-/collector') }
-
-  describe '.event' do
-    after do
-      described_class.clear_memoization(:snowplow)
-    end
-
-    context 'when usage ping is enabled' do
-      let(:tracker) { double }
-      let(:project_id) { 1 }
-
-      before do
-        stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: true, self_monitoring_project_id: project_id)
-      end
-
-      it 'sends an event to Product Analytics snowplow collector' do
-        expect(SnowplowTracker::AsyncEmitter)
-          .to receive(:new)
-          .with(described_class::COLLECTOR_URL, { protocol: 'http' })
-          .and_return('_emitter_')
-
-        expect(SnowplowTracker::Tracker)
-          .to receive(:new)
-          .with('_emitter_', an_instance_of(SnowplowTracker::Subject), 'gl', project_id.to_s)
-          .and_return(tracker)
-
-        freeze_time do
-          expect(tracker)
-            .to receive(:track_struct_event)
-            .with('category', 'action', '_label_', '_property_', '_value_', nil, (Time.current.to_f * 1000).to_i)
-
-          described_class.event('category', 'action', label: '_label_', property: '_property_',
-                                value: '_value_', context: nil)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when usage ping is disabled' do
-      before do
-        stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: false)
-      end
-
-      it 'does not send an event' do
-        expect(SnowplowTracker::Tracker).not_to receive(:new)
-
-        described_class.event('category', 'action', label: '_label_', property: '_property_',
-                              value: '_value_', context: nil)
-      end
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/quality/test_level_spec.rb b/spec/lib/quality/test_level_spec.rb
index 0239c974755..1dd0a09542a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/quality/test_level_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/quality/test_level_spec.rb
@@ -174,6 +174,10 @@ RSpec.describe Quality::TestLevel do
       expect(subject.level_for('spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/archive_legacy_traces_spec.rb')).to eq(:migration)
     end
 
+    it 'returns the correct level for an EE file without passing a prefix' do
+      expect(subject.level_for('ee/spec/migrations/geo/migrate_ci_job_artifacts_to_separate_registry_spec.rb')).to eq(:migration)
+    end
+
     it 'returns the correct level for a geo migration test' do
       expect(described_class.new('ee/').level_for('ee/spec/migrations/geo/migrate_ci_job_artifacts_to_separate_registry_spec.rb')).to eq(:migration)
     end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/ensure_u2f_registrations_migrated_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/ensure_u2f_registrations_migrated_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..77eab3b829a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/ensure_u2f_registrations_migrated_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require Rails.root.join('db', 'post_migrate', '20201026185514_ensure_u2f_registrations_migrated.rb')
+
+RSpec.describe EnsureU2fRegistrationsMigrated, schema: 20201022144501 do
+  let(:u2f_registrations) { table(:u2f_registrations) }
+  let(:webauthn_registrations) { table(:webauthn_registrations) }
+  let(:users) { table(:users) }
+
+  let(:user) { users.create!(email: 'email@email.com', name: 'foo', username: 'foo', projects_limit: 0) }
+
+  before do
+    create_u2f_registration(1, 'reg1')
+    create_u2f_registration(2, 'reg2')
+    webauthn_registrations.create!({ name: 'reg1', u2f_registration_id: 1, credential_xid: '', public_key: '', user_id: user.id })
+  end
+
+  it 'correctly migrates u2f registrations previously not migrated' do
+    expect { migrate! }.to change { webauthn_registrations.count }.from(1).to(2)
+  end
+
+  it 'migrates all valid u2f registrations depite errors' do
+    create_u2f_registration(3, 'reg3', 'invalid!')
+    create_u2f_registration(4, 'reg4')
+
+    expect { migrate! }.to change { webauthn_registrations.count }.from(1).to(3)
+  end
+
+  def create_u2f_registration(id, name, public_key = nil)
+    device = U2F::FakeU2F.new(FFaker::BaconIpsum.characters(5), { key_handle: SecureRandom.random_bytes(255) })
+    public_key ||= Base64.strict_encode64(device.origin_public_key_raw)
+    u2f_registrations.create!({ id: id,
+                               certificate: Base64.strict_encode64(device.cert_raw),
+                               key_handle: U2F.urlsafe_encode64(device.key_handle_raw),
+                               public_key: public_key,
+                               counter: 5,
+                               name: name,
+                               user_id: user.id })
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/schedule_repopulate_historical_vulnerability_statistics_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/schedule_repopulate_historical_vulnerability_statistics_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a65c94cf60e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/schedule_repopulate_historical_vulnerability_statistics_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require_migration!
+
+RSpec.describe ScheduleRepopulateHistoricalVulnerabilityStatistics do
+  let(:namespaces) { table(:namespaces) }
+  let(:projects) { table(:projects) }
+  let(:project_settings) { table(:project_settings) }
+
+  let(:namespace) { namespaces.create!(name: 'gitlab', path: 'gitlab-org') }
+  let!(:project_1) { projects.create!(namespace_id: namespace.id, name: 'foo_1') }
+  let!(:project_2) { projects.create!(namespace_id: namespace.id, name: 'foo_2') }
+  let!(:project_3) { projects.create!(namespace_id: namespace.id, name: 'foo_3') }
+  let!(:project_4) { projects.create!(namespace_id: namespace.id, name: 'foo_4') }
+
+  around do |example|
+    freeze_time { Sidekiq::Testing.fake! { example.run } }
+  end
+
+  before do
+    stub_const("#{described_class.name}::BATCH_SIZE", 1)
+
+    project_settings.create!(project_id: project_1.id, has_vulnerabilities: true)
+    project_settings.create!(project_id: project_2.id, has_vulnerabilities: false)
+    project_settings.create!(project_id: project_4.id, has_vulnerabilities: true)
+  end
+
+  it 'schedules the background jobs', :aggregate_failures do
+    migrate!
+
+    expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs.size).to be(2)
+    expect(described_class::MIGRATION_CLASS).to be_scheduled_delayed_migration(described_class::DELAY_INTERVAL, [project_1.id], described_class::DAY_COUNT)
+    expect(described_class::MIGRATION_CLASS).to be_scheduled_delayed_migration(2 * described_class::DELAY_INTERVAL, [project_4.id], described_class::DAY_COUNT)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/schedule_update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/schedule_update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..74f24906e41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/schedule_update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require Rails.root.join('db', 'post_migrate', '20201030121314_schedule_update_existing_users_that_require_two_factor_auth.rb')
+
+RSpec.describe ScheduleUpdateExistingUsersThatRequireTwoFactorAuth do
+  let(:users) { table(:users) }
+  let!(:user_1) { users.create!(require_two_factor_authentication_from_group: true, name: "user1", email: "user1@example.com", projects_limit: 1) }
+  let!(:user_2) { users.create!(require_two_factor_authentication_from_group: false, name: "user2", email: "user2@example.com", projects_limit: 1) }
+  let!(:user_3) { users.create!(require_two_factor_authentication_from_group: true, name: "user3", email: "user3@example.com", projects_limit: 1) }
+
+  before do
+    stub_const("#{described_class.name}::BATCH_SIZE", 1)
+  end
+
+  it 'schedules jobs for users that require two factor authentication' do
+    Sidekiq::Testing.fake! do
+      freeze_time do
+        migrate!
+
+        expect(described_class::MIGRATION).to be_scheduled_delayed_migration(
+          2.minutes, user_1.id, user_1.id)
+        expect(described_class::MIGRATION).to be_scheduled_delayed_migration(
+          4.minutes, user_3.id, user_3.id)
+        expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs.size).to eq(2)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/analytics/devops_adoption/segment_selection_spec.rb b/spec/models/analytics/devops_adoption/segment_selection_spec.rb
index 5866cbaa48e..64ef6636f2c 100644
--- a/spec/models/analytics/devops_adoption/segment_selection_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/analytics/devops_adoption/segment_selection_spec.rb
@@ -51,11 +51,13 @@ RSpec.describe Analytics::DevopsAdoption::SegmentSelection, type: :model do
     context 'limit the number of segment selections' do
       let_it_be(:segment) { create(:devops_adoption_segment) }
 
-      subject { build(:devops_adoption_segment_selection, segment: segment, project: project) }
+      subject { build(:devops_adoption_segment_selection, project: project, segment: segment) }
 
       before do
         create(:devops_adoption_segment_selection, :project, segment: segment)
 
+        segment.reload
+
         stub_const("#{described_class}::ALLOWED_SELECTIONS_PER_SEGMENT", 1)
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/bulk_imports/entity_spec.rb b/spec/models/bulk_imports/entity_spec.rb
index ad6e3ec6f30..0732b671729 100644
--- a/spec/models/bulk_imports/entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/bulk_imports/entity_spec.rb
@@ -82,4 +82,68 @@ RSpec.describe BulkImports::Entity, type: :model do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe "#update_tracker_for" do
+    let(:entity) { create(:bulk_import_entity) }
+
+    it "inserts new tracker when it does not exist" do
+      expect do
+        entity.update_tracker_for(relation: :relation, has_next_page: false)
+      end.to change(BulkImports::Tracker, :count).by(1)
+
+      tracker = entity.trackers.last
+
+      expect(tracker.relation).to eq('relation')
+      expect(tracker.has_next_page).to eq(false)
+      expect(tracker.next_page).to eq(nil)
+    end
+
+    it "updates the tracker if it already exist" do
+      create(
+        :bulk_import_tracker,
+        relation: :relation,
+        has_next_page: false,
+        entity: entity
+      )
+
+      expect do
+        entity.update_tracker_for(relation: :relation, has_next_page: true, next_page: 'nextPage')
+      end.not_to change(BulkImports::Tracker, :count)
+
+      tracker = entity.trackers.last
+
+      expect(tracker.relation).to eq('relation')
+      expect(tracker.has_next_page).to eq(true)
+      expect(tracker.next_page).to eq('nextPage')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "#has_next_page?" do
+    it "queries for the given relation if it has more pages to be fetched" do
+      entity = create(:bulk_import_entity)
+      create(
+        :bulk_import_tracker,
+        relation: :relation,
+        has_next_page: false,
+        entity: entity
+      )
+
+      expect(entity.has_next_page?(:relation)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "#next_page_for" do
+    it "queries for the next page of the given relation" do
+      entity = create(:bulk_import_entity)
+      create(
+        :bulk_import_tracker,
+        relation: :relation,
+        has_next_page: false,
+        next_page: 'nextPage',
+        entity: entity
+      )
+
+      expect(entity.next_page_for(:relation)).to eq('nextPage')
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb
index 5ff9b4dd493..0efb014fdfc 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb
@@ -1151,12 +1151,26 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::Build do
     end
 
     context 'when transits to skipped' do
-      before do
-        build.skip!
+      context 'when cd_skipped_deployment_status is disabled' do
+        before do
+          stub_feature_flags(cd_skipped_deployment_status: false)
+          build.skip!
+        end
+
+        it 'transits deployment status to canceled' do
+          expect(deployment).to be_canceled
+        end
       end
 
-      it 'transits deployment status to canceled' do
-        expect(deployment).to be_canceled
+      context 'when cd_skipped_deployment_status is enabled' do
+        before do
+          stub_feature_flags(cd_skipped_deployment_status: project)
+          build.skip!
+        end
+
+        it 'transits deployment status to skipped' do
+          expect(deployment).to be_skipped
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -4057,6 +4071,38 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::Build do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#collect_codequality_reports!' do
+    subject(:codequality_report) { build.collect_codequality_reports!(Gitlab::Ci::Reports::CodequalityReports.new) }
+
+    it { expect(codequality_report.degradations).to eq({}) }
+
+    context 'when build has a codequality report' do
+      context 'when there is a codequality report' do
+        before do
+          create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality, job: build, project: build.project)
+        end
+
+        it 'parses blobs and add the results to the codequality report' do
+          expect { codequality_report }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(codequality_report.degradations_count).to eq(3)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when there is an codequality report without errors' do
+        before do
+          create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality_without_errors, job: build, project: build.project)
+        end
+
+        it 'parses blobs and add the results to the codequality report' do
+          expect { codequality_report }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(codequality_report.degradations_count).to eq(0)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#collect_terraform_reports!' do
     let(:terraform_reports) { Gitlab::Ci::Reports::TerraformReports.new }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/build_trace_chunks/fog_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/build_trace_chunks/fog_spec.rb
index 20ca0c8b710..bc96e2584cf 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/build_trace_chunks/fog_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/build_trace_chunks/fog_spec.rb
@@ -74,6 +74,52 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::BuildTraceChunks::Fog do
 
         expect(data_store.data(model)).to eq new_data
       end
+
+      context 'when S3 server side encryption is enabled' do
+        before do
+          config = Gitlab.config.artifacts.object_store.to_h
+          config[:storage_options] = { server_side_encryption: 'AES256' }
+          allow(data_store).to receive(:object_store_raw_config).and_return(config)
+        end
+
+        it 'creates a file with attributes' do
+          expect_next_instance_of(Fog::AWS::Storage::Files) do |files|
+            expect(files).to receive(:create).with(
+              hash_including(
+                key: anything,
+                body: new_data,
+                'x-amz-server-side-encryption' => 'AES256')
+            ).and_call_original
+          end
+
+          expect(data_store.data(model)).to be_nil
+
+          data_store.set_data(model, new_data)
+
+          expect(data_store.data(model)).to eq new_data
+        end
+
+        context 'when ci_live_trace_use_fog_attributes flag is disabled' do
+          before do
+            stub_feature_flags(ci_live_trace_use_fog_attributes: false)
+          end
+
+          it 'does not pass along Fog attributes' do
+            expect_next_instance_of(Fog::AWS::Storage::Files) do |files|
+              expect(files).to receive(:create).with(
+                key: anything,
+                body: new_data
+              ).and_call_original
+            end
+
+            expect(data_store.data(model)).to be_nil
+
+            data_store.set_data(model, new_data)
+
+            expect(data_store.data(model)).to eq new_data
+          end
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb
index 26851c93ac3..ef21ca8f100 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb
@@ -96,6 +96,22 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::JobArtifact do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '.codequality_reports' do
+    subject { described_class.codequality_reports }
+
+    context 'when there is a codequality report' do
+      let!(:artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to eq([artifact]) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when there are no codequality reports' do
+      let!(:artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :archive) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_empty }
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '.terraform_reports' do
     context 'when there is a terraform report' do
       it 'return the job artifact' do
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
index 1ca370dc950..5a29e7b5c6c 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -498,6 +498,16 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer, factory_default: :keep do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'when pipeline has a codequality report' do
+      subject { described_class.with_reports(Ci::JobArtifact.codequality_reports) }
+
+      let(:pipeline_with_report) { create(:ci_pipeline, :with_codequality_reports) }
+
+      it 'selects the pipeline' do
+        is_expected.to eq([pipeline_with_report])
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'when pipeline has a terraform report' do
       it 'selects the pipeline' do
         pipeline_with_report = create(:ci_pipeline, :with_terraform_reports)
@@ -3360,6 +3370,39 @@ RSpec.describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer, factory_default: :keep do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#codequality_reports' do
+    subject(:codequality_reports) { pipeline.codequality_reports }
+
+    context 'when pipeline has multiple builds with codequality reports' do
+      let(:build_rspec) { create(:ci_build, :success, name: 'rspec', pipeline: pipeline, project: project) }
+      let(:build_golang) { create(:ci_build, :success, name: 'golang', pipeline: pipeline, project: project) }
+
+      before do
+        create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality, job: build_rspec, project: project)
+        create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality_without_errors, job: build_golang, project: project)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns codequality report with collected data' do
+        expect(codequality_reports.degradations_count).to eq(3)
+      end
+
+      context 'when builds are retried' do
+        let(:build_rspec) { create(:ci_build, :retried, :success, name: 'rspec', pipeline: pipeline, project: project) }
+        let(:build_golang) { create(:ci_build, :retried, :success, name: 'golang', pipeline: pipeline, project: project) }
+
+        it 'returns a codequality reports without degradations' do
+          expect(codequality_reports.degradations).to be_empty
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when pipeline does not have any builds with codequality reports' do
+      it 'returns codequality reports without degradations' do
+        expect(codequality_reports.degradations).to be_empty
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#total_size' do
     let!(:build_job1) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, stage_idx: 0) }
     let!(:build_job2) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, stage_idx: 0) }
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb
index ad1ebd4966a..5212e321a55 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb
@@ -19,35 +19,9 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::Helm do
   end
 
   describe '#can_uninstall?' do
-    context "with other existing applications" do
-      Clusters::Cluster::APPLICATIONS.keys.each do |application_name|
-        next if application_name == 'helm'
+    subject(:application) { build(:clusters_applications_helm).can_uninstall? }
 
-        it "is false when #{application_name} is installed" do
-          cluster_application = create("clusters_applications_#{application_name}".to_sym)
-
-          helm = cluster_application.cluster.application_helm
-
-          expect(helm.allowed_to_uninstall?).to be_falsy
-        end
-      end
-
-      it 'executes a single query only' do
-        cluster_application = create(:clusters_applications_ingress)
-        helm = cluster_application.cluster.application_helm
-
-        query_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new { helm.allowed_to_uninstall? }.count
-        expect(query_count).to eq(1)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context "without other existing applications" do
-      subject { helm.can_uninstall? }
-
-      let(:helm) { create(:clusters_applications_helm) }
-
-      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
-    end
+    it { is_expected.to eq true }
   end
 
   describe '#issue_client_cert' do
@@ -135,14 +109,4 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::Helm do
       end
     end
   end
-
-  describe '#post_uninstall' do
-    let(:helm) { create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installed) }
-
-    it do
-      expect(helm.cluster.kubeclient).to receive(:delete_namespace).with('gitlab-managed-apps')
-
-      helm.post_uninstall
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/deployment_spec.rb b/spec/models/deployment_spec.rb
index 9afacd518af..3da1509f075 100644
--- a/spec/models/deployment_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/deployment_spec.rb
@@ -202,6 +202,31 @@ RSpec.describe Deployment do
         deployment.cancel!
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when deployment was skipped' do
+      let(:deployment) { create(:deployment, :running) }
+
+      it 'has correct status' do
+        deployment.skip!
+
+        expect(deployment).to be_skipped
+        expect(deployment.finished_at).to be_nil
+      end
+
+      it 'does not execute Deployments::LinkMergeRequestWorker asynchronously' do
+        expect(Deployments::LinkMergeRequestWorker)
+          .not_to receive(:perform_async).with(deployment.id)
+
+        deployment.skip!
+      end
+
+      it 'does not execute Deployments::ExecuteHooksWorker' do
+        expect(Deployments::ExecuteHooksWorker)
+            .not_to receive(:perform_async).with(deployment.id)
+
+        deployment.skip!
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#success?' do
@@ -320,6 +345,7 @@ RSpec.describe Deployment do
         deployment2 = create(:deployment, status: :running )
         create(:deployment, status: :failed )
         create(:deployment, status: :canceled )
+        create(:deployment, status: :skipped)
 
         is_expected.to contain_exactly(deployment1, deployment2)
       end
@@ -346,10 +372,54 @@ RSpec.describe Deployment do
       it 'retrieves deployments with deployable builds' do
         with_deployable = create(:deployment)
         create(:deployment, deployable: nil)
+        create(:deployment, deployable_type: 'CommitStatus', deployable_id: non_existing_record_id)
 
         is_expected.to contain_exactly(with_deployable)
       end
     end
+
+    describe 'visible' do
+      subject { described_class.visible }
+
+      it 'retrieves the visible deployments' do
+        deployment1 = create(:deployment, status: :running)
+        deployment2 = create(:deployment, status: :success)
+        deployment3 = create(:deployment, status: :failed)
+        deployment4 = create(:deployment, status: :canceled)
+        create(:deployment, status: :skipped)
+
+        is_expected.to contain_exactly(deployment1, deployment2, deployment3, deployment4)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'latest_for_sha' do
+    subject { described_class.latest_for_sha(sha) }
+
+    let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let_it_be(:commits) { project.repository.commits('master', limit: 2) }
+    let_it_be(:deployments) { commits.reverse.map { |commit| create(:deployment, project: project, sha: commit.id) } }
+    let(:sha) { commits.map(&:id) }
+
+    it 'finds the latest deployment with sha' do
+      is_expected.to eq(deployments.last)
+    end
+
+    context 'when sha is old' do
+      let(:sha) { commits.last.id }
+
+      it 'finds the latest deployment with sha' do
+        is_expected.to eq(deployments.first)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when sha is nil' do
+      let(:sha) { nil }
+
+      it 'returns nothing' do
+        is_expected.to be_nil
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#includes_commit?' do
diff --git a/spec/models/diff_note_spec.rb b/spec/models/diff_note_spec.rb
index f7ce44f7281..215c733f26b 100644
--- a/spec/models/diff_note_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/diff_note_spec.rb
@@ -38,6 +38,26 @@ RSpec.describe DiffNote do
     it_behaves_like 'a valid diff positionable note' do
       subject { build(:diff_note_on_commit, project: project, commit_id: commit_id, position: position) }
     end
+
+    it "is not valid when noteable is empty" do
+      note = build(:diff_note_on_merge_request, project: project, noteable: nil)
+
+      note.valid?
+
+      expect(note.errors[:noteable]).to include("doesn't support new-style diff notes")
+    end
+
+    context 'when importing' do
+      it "does not check if it's supported" do
+        note = build(:diff_note_on_merge_request, project: project, noteable: nil)
+        note.importing = true
+        note.valid?
+
+        expect(note.errors.full_messages).not_to include(
+          "Noteable doesn't support new-style diff notes"
+        )
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe "#position=" do
diff --git a/spec/models/environment_spec.rb b/spec/models/environment_spec.rb
index 179f2a1b0e0..27c9e62712c 100644
--- a/spec/models/environment_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/environment_spec.rb
@@ -1394,4 +1394,31 @@ RSpec.describe Environment, :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching do
       it { is_expected.to be(false) }
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#cancel_deployment_jobs!' do
+    subject { environment.cancel_deployment_jobs! }
+
+    let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let_it_be(:environment, reload: true) { create(:environment, project: project) }
+    let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, project: project, environment: environment, deployable: build) }
+    let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :running, project: project, environment: environment) }
+
+    it 'cancels an active deployment job' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(build.reset).to be_canceled
+    end
+
+    context 'when deployable does not exist' do
+      before do
+        deployment.update_column(:deployable_id, non_existing_record_id)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not raise an error' do
+        expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
+
+        expect(build.reset).to be_running
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/exported_protected_branch_spec.rb b/spec/models/exported_protected_branch_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7886a522741
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/models/exported_protected_branch_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe ExportedProtectedBranch do
+  describe 'Associations' do
+    it { is_expected.to have_many(:push_access_levels) }
+  end
+
+  describe '.push_access_levels' do
+    it 'returns the correct push access levels' do
+      exported_branch = create(:exported_protected_branch, :developers_can_push)
+      deploy_key = create(:deploy_key)
+      create(:deploy_keys_project, :write_access, project: exported_branch.project, deploy_key: deploy_key )
+      create(:protected_branch_push_access_level, protected_branch: exported_branch, deploy_key: deploy_key)
+      dev_push_access_level = exported_branch.push_access_levels.first
+
+      expect(exported_branch.push_access_levels).to contain_exactly(dev_push_access_level)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb b/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb
index 383e548c324..d3566ed04c2 100644
--- a/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb
@@ -10,31 +10,35 @@ RSpec.describe InstanceConfiguration do
         let(:sha256) { 'SHA256:2KJDT7xf2i68mBgJ3TVsjISntg4droLbXYLfQj0VvSY' }
 
         it 'does not return anything if file does not exist' do
-          stub_pub_file(exist: false)
+          stub_pub_file(pub_file(exist: false))
 
           expect(subject.settings[:ssh_algorithms_hashes]).to be_empty
         end
 
         it 'does not return anything if file is empty' do
-          stub_pub_file
+          stub_pub_file(pub_file)
 
-          allow(File).to receive(:read).and_return('')
+          stub_file_read(pub_file, content: '')
 
           expect(subject.settings[:ssh_algorithms_hashes]).to be_empty
         end
 
         it 'returns the md5 and sha256 if file valid and exists' do
-          stub_pub_file
+          stub_pub_file(pub_file)
 
           result = subject.settings[:ssh_algorithms_hashes].select { |o| o[:md5] == md5 && o[:sha256] == sha256 }
 
           expect(result.size).to eq(InstanceConfiguration::SSH_ALGORITHMS.size)
         end
 
-        def stub_pub_file(exist: true)
+        def pub_file(exist: true)
           path = exist ? 'spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub' : 'spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub.random'
 
-          allow(subject).to receive(:ssh_algorithm_file).and_return(Rails.root.join(path))
+          Rails.root.join(path)
+        end
+
+        def stub_pub_file(path)
+          allow(subject).to receive(:ssh_algorithm_file).and_return(path)
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/issue_spec.rb b/spec/models/issue_spec.rb
index 16ea2989eda..81f045b4db1 100644
--- a/spec/models/issue_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/issue_spec.rb
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ RSpec.describe Issue do
   describe '.with_issue_type' do
     let_it_be(:issue) { create(:issue, project: reusable_project) }
     let_it_be(:incident) { create(:incident, project: reusable_project) }
-    let_it_be(:test_case) { create(:quality_test_case, project: reusable_project) }
 
     it 'gives issues with the given issue type' do
       expect(described_class.with_issue_type('issue'))
@@ -149,8 +148,8 @@ RSpec.describe Issue do
     end
 
     it 'gives issues with the given issue type' do
-      expect(described_class.with_issue_type(%w(issue incident test_case)))
-        .to contain_exactly(issue, incident, test_case)
+      expect(described_class.with_issue_type(%w(issue incident)))
+        .to contain_exactly(issue, incident)
     end
   end
 
@@ -370,6 +369,20 @@ RSpec.describe Issue do
       expect(link_types).not_to include(nil)
     end
 
+    it 'returns issues including the link creation time' do
+      dates = authorized_issue_a.related_issues(user).map(&:issue_link_created_at)
+
+      expect(dates).not_to be_empty
+      expect(dates).not_to include(nil)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns issues including the link update time' do
+      dates = authorized_issue_a.related_issues(user).map(&:issue_link_updated_at)
+
+      expect(dates).not_to be_empty
+      expect(dates).not_to include(nil)
+    end
+
     describe 'when a user cannot read cross project' do
       it 'only returns issues within the same project' do
         expect(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).with(user, :read_all_resources, :global).at_least(:once).and_call_original
diff --git a/spec/models/merge_request_reviewer_spec.rb b/spec/models/merge_request_reviewer_spec.rb
index 55199cd96ad..76b44abca54 100644
--- a/spec/models/merge_request_reviewer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/merge_request_reviewer_spec.rb
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestReviewer do
 
   describe 'associations' do
     it { is_expected.to belong_to(:merge_request).class_name('MergeRequest') }
-    it { is_expected.to belong_to(:reviewer).class_name('User') }
+    it { is_expected.to belong_to(:reviewer).class_name('User').inverse_of(:merge_request_reviewers) }
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb b/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb
index 9574c57e46c..454c3e1ba7f 100644
--- a/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb
@@ -92,6 +92,39 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequest, factory_default: :keep do
     it { is_expected.not_to include(mr_without_jira_reference) }
   end
 
+  context 'scopes' do
+    let_it_be(:user1) { create(:user) }
+    let_it_be(:user2) { create(:user) }
+
+    let_it_be(:merge_request1) { create(:merge_request, :unique_branches, reviewers: [user1])}
+    let_it_be(:merge_request2) { create(:merge_request, :unique_branches, reviewers: [user2])}
+    let_it_be(:merge_request3) { create(:merge_request, :unique_branches, reviewers: [])}
+
+    describe '.review_requested' do
+      it 'returns MRs that has any review requests' do
+        expect(described_class.review_requested).to eq([merge_request1, merge_request2])
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '.no_review_requested' do
+      it 'returns MRs that has no review requests' do
+        expect(described_class.no_review_requested).to eq([merge_request3])
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '.review_requested_to' do
+      it 'returns MRs that the user has been requested to review' do
+        expect(described_class.review_requested_to(user1)).to eq([merge_request1])
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '.no_review_requested_to' do
+      it 'returns MRs that the user has been requested to review' do
+        expect(described_class.no_review_requested_to(user1)).to eq([merge_request2, merge_request3])
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#squash_in_progress?' do
     let(:repo_path) do
       Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
diff --git a/spec/models/namespace_onboarding_action_spec.rb b/spec/models/namespace_onboarding_action_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9dd82c05032
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/models/namespace_onboarding_action_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe NamespaceOnboardingAction do
+  it { is_expected.to belong_to :namespace }
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb b/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb
index 85f9005052e..0130618d004 100644
--- a/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ RSpec.describe Namespace do
     it { is_expected.to have_one :aggregation_schedule }
     it { is_expected.to have_one :namespace_settings }
     it { is_expected.to have_many :custom_emoji }
+    it { is_expected.to have_many :namespace_onboarding_actions }
   end
 
   describe 'validations' do
diff --git a/spec/models/pages/lookup_path_spec.rb b/spec/models/pages/lookup_path_spec.rb
index f8ebc237577..632313f26d3 100644
--- a/spec/models/pages/lookup_path_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/pages/lookup_path_spec.rb
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ RSpec.describe Pages::LookupPath do
 
   before do
     stub_pages_setting(access_control: true, external_https: ["1.1.1.1:443"])
-    stub_artifacts_object_storage
     stub_pages_object_storage(::Pages::DeploymentUploader)
   end
 
@@ -117,64 +116,6 @@ RSpec.describe Pages::LookupPath do
         include_examples 'uses disk storage'
       end
     end
-
-    context 'when artifact_id from build job is present in pages metadata' do
-      let(:artifacts_archive) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :zip, :remote_store, project: project) }
-
-      before do
-        project.mark_pages_as_deployed(artifacts_archive: artifacts_archive)
-      end
-
-      it 'uses artifacts object storage' do
-        Timecop.freeze do
-          expect(source).to(
-            eq({
-                 type: 'zip',
-                 path: artifacts_archive.file.url(expire_at: 1.day.from_now),
-                 global_id: "gid://gitlab/Ci::JobArtifact/#{artifacts_archive.id}",
-                 sha256: artifacts_archive.file_sha256,
-                 file_size: artifacts_archive.size,
-                 file_count: nil
-               })
-          )
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when artifact is not uploaded to object storage' do
-        let(:artifacts_archive) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :zip) }
-
-        it 'uses file protocol', :aggregate_failures do
-          Timecop.freeze do
-            expect(source).to(
-              eq({
-                   type: 'zip',
-                   path: 'file://' + artifacts_archive.file.path,
-                   global_id: "gid://gitlab/Ci::JobArtifact/#{artifacts_archive.id}",
-                   sha256: artifacts_archive.file_sha256,
-                   file_size: artifacts_archive.size,
-                   file_count: nil
-                 })
-            )
-          end
-        end
-
-        context 'when pages_serve_with_zip_file_protocol feature flag is disabled' do
-          before do
-            stub_feature_flags(pages_serve_with_zip_file_protocol: false)
-          end
-
-          include_examples 'uses disk storage'
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when feature flag is disabled' do
-        before do
-          stub_feature_flags(pages_serve_from_artifacts_archive: false)
-        end
-
-        include_examples 'uses disk storage'
-      end
-    end
   end
 
   describe '#prefix' do
diff --git a/spec/models/project_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_spec.rb
index c8b96963d5d..b4da57ed89b 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_spec.rb
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ RSpec.describe Project, factory_default: :keep do
     it { is_expected.to have_many(:deploy_keys) }
     it { is_expected.to have_many(:hooks) }
     it { is_expected.to have_many(:protected_branches) }
+    it { is_expected.to have_many(:exported_protected_branches) }
     it { is_expected.to have_one(:slack_service) }
     it { is_expected.to have_one(:microsoft_teams_service) }
     it { is_expected.to have_one(:mattermost_service) }
diff --git a/spec/models/snippet_spec.rb b/spec/models/snippet_spec.rb
index d74f5faab7f..9cf22a9392d 100644
--- a/spec/models/snippet_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/snippet_spec.rb
@@ -481,17 +481,9 @@ RSpec.describe Snippet do
   end
 
   describe '#blobs' do
-    let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
-
-    it 'returns a blob representing the snippet data' do
-      blob = snippet.blob
-
-      expect(blob).to be_a(Blob)
-      expect(blob.path).to eq(snippet.file_name)
-      expect(blob.data).to eq(snippet.content)
-    end
-
     context 'when repository does not exist' do
+      let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
+
       it 'returns empty array' do
         expect(snippet.blobs).to be_empty
       end
diff --git a/spec/models/system_note_metadata_spec.rb b/spec/models/system_note_metadata_spec.rb
index 9a6b57afb97..144c65d2f62 100644
--- a/spec/models/system_note_metadata_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/system_note_metadata_spec.rb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ RSpec.describe SystemNoteMetadata do
 
     context 'when action type is invalid' do
       subject do
-        build(:system_note_metadata, note: build(:note), action: 'invalid_type' )
+        build(:system_note_metadata, note: build(:note), action: 'invalid_type')
       end
 
       it { is_expected.to be_invalid }
@@ -21,7 +21,15 @@ RSpec.describe SystemNoteMetadata do
 
     context 'when action type is valid' do
       subject do
-        build(:system_note_metadata, note: build(:note), action: 'merge' )
+        build(:system_note_metadata, note: build(:note), action: 'merge')
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_valid }
+    end
+
+    context 'when importing' do
+      subject do
+        build(:system_note_metadata, note: nil, action: 'merge', importing: true)
       end
 
       it { is_expected.to be_valid }
diff --git a/spec/models/terraform/state_spec.rb b/spec/models/terraform/state_spec.rb
index ca8fe4cca3b..ef91e4a5a71 100644
--- a/spec/models/terraform/state_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/terraform/state_spec.rb
@@ -3,21 +3,13 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe Terraform::State do
-  subject { create(:terraform_state, :with_file) }
-
-  let(:terraform_state_file) { fixture_file('terraform/terraform.tfstate') }
-
-  it { is_expected.to be_a FileStoreMounter }
+  subject { create(:terraform_state, :with_version) }
 
   it { is_expected.to belong_to(:project) }
   it { is_expected.to belong_to(:locked_by_user).class_name('User') }
 
   it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:project_id) }
 
-  before do
-    stub_terraform_state_object_storage
-  end
-
   describe 'scopes' do
     describe '.ordered_by_name' do
       let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
@@ -35,64 +27,18 @@ RSpec.describe Terraform::State do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#file' do
-    context 'when a file exists' do
-      it 'does not use the default file' do
-        expect(subject.file.read).to eq(terraform_state_file)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#file_store' do
-    context 'when a value is set' do
-      it 'returns the value' do
-        [ObjectStorage::Store::LOCAL, ObjectStorage::Store::REMOTE].each do |store|
-          expect(build(:terraform_state, file_store: store).file_store).to eq(store)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#update_file_store' do
-    context 'when file is stored in object storage' do
-      it_behaves_like 'mounted file in object store'
-    end
-
-    context 'when file is stored locally' do
-      before do
-        stub_terraform_state_object_storage(enabled: false)
-      end
-
-      it_behaves_like 'mounted file in local store'
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#latest_file' do
-    subject { terraform_state.latest_file }
-
-    context 'versioning is enabled' do
-      let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state, :with_version) }
-      let(:latest_version) { terraform_state.latest_version }
-
-      it { is_expected.to eq latest_version.file }
-
-      context 'but no version exists yet' do
-        let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state) }
+    let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state, :with_version) }
+    let(:latest_version) { terraform_state.latest_version }
 
-        it { is_expected.to be_nil }
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'versioning is disabled' do
-      let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state, :with_file) }
+    subject { terraform_state.latest_file }
 
-      it { is_expected.to eq terraform_state.file }
+    it { is_expected.to eq latest_version.file }
 
-      context 'and a version exists (migration to versioned in progress)' do
-        let!(:migrated_version) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: terraform_state) }
+    context 'but no version exists yet' do
+      let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state) }
 
-        it { is_expected.to eq terraform_state.latest_version.file }
-      end
+      it { is_expected.to be_nil }
     end
   end
 
@@ -115,39 +61,30 @@ RSpec.describe Terraform::State do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'versioning is disabled' do
-      let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state, :with_file) }
-
-      it 'modifies the existing state record' do
-        expect { subject }.not_to change { Terraform::StateVersion.count }
+    context 'versioning is disabled (migration to versioned in progress)' do
+      let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state, versioning_enabled: false) }
+      let!(:migrated_version) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: terraform_state, version: 0) }
 
-        expect(terraform_state.latest_file.read).to eq(data)
-      end
-
-      context 'and a version exists (migration to versioned in progress)' do
-        let!(:migrated_version) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: terraform_state, version: 0) }
+      it 'creates a new version, corrects the migrated version number, and marks the state as versioned' do
+        expect { subject }.to change { Terraform::StateVersion.count }
 
-        it 'creates a new version, corrects the migrated version number, and marks the state as versioned' do
-          expect { subject }.to change { Terraform::StateVersion.count }
+        expect(migrated_version.reload.version).to eq(1)
+        expect(migrated_version.file.read).to eq(fixture_file('terraform/terraform.tfstate'))
 
-          expect(migrated_version.reload.version).to eq(1)
-          expect(migrated_version.file.read).to eq(terraform_state_file)
+        expect(terraform_state.reload.latest_version.version).to eq(version)
+        expect(terraform_state.latest_version.file.read).to eq(data)
+        expect(terraform_state).to be_versioning_enabled
+      end
 
-          expect(terraform_state.reload.latest_version.version).to eq(version)
-          expect(terraform_state.latest_version.file.read).to eq(data)
-          expect(terraform_state).to be_versioning_enabled
+      context 'the current version cannot be determined' do
+        before do
+          migrated_version.update!(file: CarrierWaveStringFile.new('invalid-json'))
         end
 
-        context 'the current version cannot be determined' do
-          before do
-            migrated_version.update!(file: CarrierWaveStringFile.new('invalid-json'))
-          end
-
-          it 'uses version - 1 to correct the migrated version number' do
-            expect { subject }.to change { Terraform::StateVersion.count }
+        it 'uses version - 1 to correct the migrated version number' do
+          expect { subject }.to change { Terraform::StateVersion.count }
 
-            expect(migrated_version.reload.version).to eq(2)
-          end
+          expect(migrated_version.reload.version).to eq(2)
         end
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/models/user_spec.rb b/spec/models/user_spec.rb
index 19a6a3ce3c4..87dab84fe7b 100644
--- a/spec/models/user_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/user_spec.rb
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ RSpec.describe User do
     it { is_expected.to have_many(:releases).dependent(:nullify) }
     it { is_expected.to have_many(:metrics_users_starred_dashboards).inverse_of(:user) }
     it { is_expected.to have_many(:reviews).inverse_of(:author) }
+    it { is_expected.to have_many(:merge_request_assignees).inverse_of(:assignee) }
+    it { is_expected.to have_many(:merge_request_reviewers).inverse_of(:reviewer) }
 
     describe "#user_detail" do
       it 'does not persist `user_detail` by default' do
@@ -2024,9 +2026,10 @@ RSpec.describe User do
   end
 
   describe '.search' do
-    let!(:user) { create(:user, name: 'user', username: 'usern', email: 'email@gmail.com') }
-    let!(:user2) { create(:user, name: 'user name', username: 'username', email: 'someemail@gmail.com') }
-    let!(:user3) { create(:user, name: 'us', username: 'se', email: 'foo@gmail.com') }
+    let_it_be(:user) { create(:user, name: 'user', username: 'usern', email: 'email@example.com') }
+    let_it_be(:user2) { create(:user, name: 'user name', username: 'username', email: 'someemail@example.com') }
+    let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user, name: 'us', username: 'se', email: 'foo@example.com') }
+    let_it_be(:email) { create(:email, user: user, email: 'alias@example.com') }
 
     describe 'name matching' do
       it 'returns users with a matching name with exact match first' do
@@ -2056,7 +2059,7 @@ RSpec.describe User do
       end
 
       it 'does not return users with a partially matching Email' do
-        expect(described_class.search(user.email[0..2])).not_to include(user, user2)
+        expect(described_class.search(user.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
       end
 
       it 'returns users with a matching Email regardless of the casing' do
@@ -2064,6 +2067,36 @@ RSpec.describe User do
       end
     end
 
+    describe 'secondary email matching' do
+      context 'feature flag :user_search_secondary_email is enabled' do
+        it 'returns users with a matching secondary email' do
+          expect(described_class.search(email.email)).to include(email.user)
+        end
+
+        it 'does not return users with a matching part of secondary email' do
+          expect(described_class.search(email.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
+        end
+
+        it 'returns users with a matching secondary email regardless of the casing' do
+          expect(described_class.search(email.email.upcase)).to include(email.user)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'feature flag :user_search_secondary_email is disabled' do
+        before do
+          stub_feature_flags(user_search_secondary_email: false)
+        end
+
+        it 'does not return users with a matching secondary email' do
+          expect(described_class.search(email.email)).not_to include(email.user)
+        end
+
+        it 'does not return users with a matching part of secondary email' do
+          expect(described_class.search(email.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
     describe 'username matching' do
       it 'returns users with a matching username' do
         expect(described_class.search(user.username)).to eq([user, user2])
@@ -2103,65 +2136,119 @@ RSpec.describe User do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '.search_with_secondary_emails' do
-    delegate :search_with_secondary_emails, to: :described_class
+  describe '.search_without_secondary_emails' do
+    let_it_be(:user) { create(:user, name: 'John Doe', username: 'john.doe', email: 'someone.1@example.com' ) }
+    let_it_be(:another_user) { create(:user, name: 'Albert Smith', username: 'albert.smith', email: 'another.2@example.com' ) }
+    let_it_be(:email) { create(:email, user: another_user, email: 'alias@example.com') }
+
+    it 'returns users with a matching name' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.name)).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a partially matching name' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.name[0..2])).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a matching name regardless of the casing' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.name.upcase)).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a matching email' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.email)).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'does not return users with a partially matching email' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a matching email regardless of the casing' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.email.upcase)).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a matching username' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.username)).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a partially matching username' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.username[0..2])).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users with a matching username regardless of the casing' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(user.username.upcase)).to eq([user])
+    end
+
+    it 'does not return users with a matching whole secondary email' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(email.email)).not_to include(email.user)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not return users with a matching part of secondary email' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(email.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
+    end
 
-    let!(:user) { create(:user, name: 'John Doe', username: 'john.doe', email: 'john.doe@example.com' ) }
-    let!(:another_user) { create(:user, name: 'Albert Smith', username: 'albert.smith', email: 'albert.smith@example.com' ) }
-    let!(:email) do
-      create(:email, user: another_user, email: 'alias@example.com')
+    it 'returns no matches for an empty string' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails('')).to be_empty
+    end
+
+    it 'returns no matches for nil' do
+      expect(described_class.search_without_secondary_emails(nil)).to be_empty
     end
+  end
+
+  describe '.search_with_secondary_emails' do
+    let_it_be(:user) { create(:user, name: 'John Doe', username: 'john.doe', email: 'someone.1@example.com' ) }
+    let_it_be(:another_user) { create(:user, name: 'Albert Smith', username: 'albert.smith', email: 'another.2@example.com' ) }
+    let_it_be(:email) { create(:email, user: another_user, email: 'alias@example.com') }
 
     it 'returns users with a matching name' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.name)).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.name)).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a partially matching name' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.name[0..2])).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.name[0..2])).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a matching name regardless of the casing' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.name.upcase)).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.name.upcase)).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a matching email' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.email)).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.email)).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'does not return users with a partially matching email' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.email[0..2])).not_to include([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a matching email regardless of the casing' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.email.upcase)).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.email.upcase)).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a matching username' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.username)).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.username)).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a partially matching username' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.username[0..2])).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.username[0..2])).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a matching username regardless of the casing' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(user.username.upcase)).to eq([user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(user.username.upcase)).to eq([user])
     end
 
     it 'returns users with a matching whole secondary email' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(email.email)).to eq([email.user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(email.email)).to eq([email.user])
     end
 
     it 'does not return users with a matching part of secondary email' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(email.email[1..4])).not_to include([email.user])
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(email.email[1...-1])).to be_empty
     end
 
     it 'returns no matches for an empty string' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails('')).to be_empty
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails('')).to be_empty
     end
 
     it 'returns no matches for nil' do
-      expect(search_with_secondary_emails(nil)).to be_empty
+      expect(described_class.search_with_secondary_emails(nil)).to be_empty
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/presenters/projects/import_export/project_export_presenter_spec.rb b/spec/presenters/projects/import_export/project_export_presenter_spec.rb
index 8463d01d95b..b2b2ce35f34 100644
--- a/spec/presenters/projects/import_export/project_export_presenter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/presenters/projects/import_export/project_export_presenter_spec.rb
@@ -45,6 +45,14 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::ImportExport::ProjectExportPresenter do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#protected_branches' do
+    it 'returns the project exported protected branches' do
+      expect(project).to receive(:exported_protected_branches)
+
+      subject.protected_branches
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#project_members' do
     let(:user2) { create(:user, email: 'group@member.com') }
     let(:member_emails) do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/admin/instance_clusters_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/admin/instance_clusters_spec.rb
index 1052080aad4..ab3b6b718e1 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/admin/instance_clusters_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/admin/instance_clusters_spec.rb
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ RSpec.describe ::API::Admin::InstanceClusters do
           expect(json_response['environment_scope']).to eq('*')
           expect(json_response['cluster_type']).to eq('instance_type')
           expect(json_response['domain']).to eq('example.com')
+          expect(json_response['enabled']).to be_truthy
+          expect(json_response['managed']).to be_truthy
         end
 
         it 'returns kubernetes platform information' do
@@ -163,6 +165,7 @@ RSpec.describe ::API::Admin::InstanceClusters do
         name: 'test-instance-cluster',
         domain: 'domain.example.com',
         managed: false,
+        enabled: false,
         namespace_per_environment: false,
         platform_kubernetes_attributes: platform_kubernetes_attributes,
         clusterable: clusterable
@@ -205,9 +208,9 @@ RSpec.describe ::API::Admin::InstanceClusters do
           expect(cluster_result.name).to eq('test-instance-cluster')
           expect(cluster_result.domain).to eq('domain.example.com')
           expect(cluster_result.environment_scope).to eq('*')
-          expect(cluster_result.enabled).to eq(true)
-          expect(platform_kubernetes.authorization_type).to eq('rbac')
           expect(cluster_result.managed).to be_falsy
+          expect(cluster_result.enabled).to be_falsy
+          expect(platform_kubernetes.authorization_type).to eq('rbac')
           expect(cluster_result.namespace_per_environment).to eq(false)
           expect(platform_kubernetes.api_url).to eq("https://example.com")
           expect(platform_kubernetes.token).to eq('sample-token')
@@ -301,6 +304,8 @@ RSpec.describe ::API::Admin::InstanceClusters do
     let(:update_params) do
       {
         domain: domain,
+        managed: false,
+        enabled: false,
         platform_kubernetes_attributes: platform_kubernetes_attributes
       }
     end
@@ -326,6 +331,8 @@ RSpec.describe ::API::Admin::InstanceClusters do
 
         it 'updates cluster attributes' do
           expect(cluster.domain).to eq('new-domain.com')
+          expect(cluster.managed).to be_falsy
+          expect(cluster.enabled).to be_falsy
         end
       end
 
@@ -338,6 +345,8 @@ RSpec.describe ::API::Admin::InstanceClusters do
 
         it 'does not update cluster attributes' do
           expect(cluster.domain).to eq('old-domain.com')
+          expect(cluster.managed).to be_truthy
+          expect(cluster.enabled).to be_truthy
         end
 
         it 'returns validation errors' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/ci/runner/jobs_artifacts_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/ci/runner/jobs_artifacts_spec.rb
index 71be0c30f5a..4d8da50f8f0 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/ci/runner/jobs_artifacts_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/ci/runner/jobs_artifacts_spec.rb
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::Ci::Runner, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
             }
 
             expect { authorize_artifacts_with_token_in_headers(artifact_type: :lsif) }
-              .to change { Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.unique_events(tracking_params) }
+              .to change { Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::HLLRedisCounter.unique_events(**tracking_params) }
               .by(1)
           end
         end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/features_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/features_spec.rb
index 3f443b4f92b..acc49768545 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/features_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/features_spec.rb
@@ -6,6 +6,18 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
   let_it_be(:user)  { create(:user) }
   let_it_be(:admin) { create(:admin) }
 
+  # Find any `development` feature flag name
+  let(:known_feature_flag) do
+    Feature::Definition.definitions
+      .values.find(&:development?)
+  end
+
+  let(:known_feature_flag_definition_hash) do
+    a_hash_including(
+      'type' => 'development'
+    )
+  end
+
   before do
     Feature.reset
     Flipper.unregister_groups
@@ -22,12 +34,14 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
         {
           'name' => 'feature_1',
           'state' => 'on',
-          'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }]
+          'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }],
+          'definition' => nil
         },
         {
           'name' => 'feature_2',
           'state' => 'off',
-          'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }]
+          'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }],
+          'definition' => nil
         },
         {
           'name' => 'feature_3',
@@ -35,7 +49,14 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           'gates' => [
             { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
             { 'key' => 'groups', 'value' => ['perf_team'] }
-          ]
+          ],
+          'definition' => nil
+        },
+        {
+          'name' => known_feature_flag.name,
+          'state' => 'on',
+          'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }],
+          'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
         }
       ]
     end
@@ -44,6 +65,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
       Feature.enable('feature_1')
       Feature.disable('feature_2')
       Feature.enable('feature_3', Feature.group(:perf_team))
+      Feature.enable(known_feature_flag.name)
     end
 
     it 'returns a 401 for anonymous users' do
@@ -67,7 +89,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
   end
 
   describe 'POST /feature' do
-    let(:feature_name) { 'my_feature' }
+    let(:feature_name) { known_feature_flag.name }
 
     context 'when the feature does not exist' do
       it 'returns a 401 for anonymous users' do
@@ -87,43 +109,49 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'on',
-            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }])
+            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'creates an enabled feature for the given Flipper group when passed feature_group=perf_team' do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', feature_group: 'perf_team' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'conditional',
             'gates' => [
               { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
               { 'key' => 'groups', 'value' => ['perf_team'] }
-            ])
+            ],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'creates an enabled feature for the given user when passed user=username' do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', user: user.username }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'conditional',
             'gates' => [
               { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
               { 'key' => 'actors', 'value' => ["User:#{user.id}"] }
-            ])
+            ],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'creates an enabled feature for the given user and feature group when passed user=username and feature_group=perf_team' do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', user: user.username, feature_group: 'perf_team' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response['name']).to eq('my_feature')
+          expect(json_response['name']).to eq(feature_name)
           expect(json_response['state']).to eq('conditional')
           expect(json_response['gates']).to contain_exactly(
             { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
@@ -141,13 +169,15 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
             post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', project: project.full_path }
 
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-            expect(json_response).to eq(
-              'name' => 'my_feature',
+            expect(json_response).to match(
+              'name' => feature_name,
               'state' => 'conditional',
               'gates' => [
                 { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
                 { 'key' => 'actors', 'value' => ["Project:#{project.id}"] }
-              ])
+              ],
+              'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+            )
           end
         end
 
@@ -156,12 +186,13 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
             post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', project: 'mep/to/the/mep/mep' }
 
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-            expect(json_response).to eq(
-              "name" => "my_feature",
+            expect(json_response).to match(
+              "name" => feature_name,
               "state" => "off",
               "gates" => [
                 { "key" => "boolean", "value" => false }
-              ]
+              ],
+              'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
             )
           end
         end
@@ -175,13 +206,15 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
             post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', group: group.full_path }
 
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-            expect(json_response).to eq(
-              'name' => 'my_feature',
+            expect(json_response).to match(
+              'name' => feature_name,
               'state' => 'conditional',
               'gates' => [
                 { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
                 { 'key' => 'actors', 'value' => ["Group:#{group.id}"] }
-              ])
+              ],
+              'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+            )
           end
         end
 
@@ -190,12 +223,13 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
             post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', group: 'not/a/group' }
 
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-            expect(json_response).to eq(
-              "name" => "my_feature",
+            expect(json_response).to match(
+              "name" => feature_name,
               "state" => "off",
               "gates" => [
                 { "key" => "boolean", "value" => false }
-              ]
+              ],
+              'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
             )
           end
         end
@@ -205,26 +239,30 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
         post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: '50' }
 
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-        expect(json_response).to eq(
-          'name' => 'my_feature',
+        expect(json_response).to match(
+          'name' => feature_name,
           'state' => 'conditional',
           'gates' => [
             { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
             { 'key' => 'percentage_of_time', 'value' => 50 }
-          ])
+          ],
+          'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+        )
       end
 
       it 'creates a feature with the given percentage of actors if passed an integer' do
         post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: '50', key: 'percentage_of_actors' }
 
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-        expect(json_response).to eq(
-          'name' => 'my_feature',
+        expect(json_response).to match(
+          'name' => feature_name,
           'state' => 'conditional',
           'gates' => [
             { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
             { 'key' => 'percentage_of_actors', 'value' => 50 }
-          ])
+          ],
+          'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+        )
       end
     end
 
@@ -238,36 +276,42 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'on',
-            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }])
+            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => true }],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'enables the feature for the given Flipper group when passed feature_group=perf_team' do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', feature_group: 'perf_team' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'conditional',
             'gates' => [
               { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
               { 'key' => 'groups', 'value' => ['perf_team'] }
-            ])
+            ],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'enables the feature for the given user when passed user=username' do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'true', user: user.username }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'conditional',
             'gates' => [
               { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
               { 'key' => 'actors', 'value' => ["User:#{user.id}"] }
-            ])
+            ],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
       end
 
@@ -279,10 +323,12 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'false' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'off',
-            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }])
+            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'disables the feature for the given Flipper group when passed feature_group=perf_team' do
@@ -292,10 +338,12 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'false', feature_group: 'perf_team' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'off',
-            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }])
+            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
 
         it 'disables the feature for the given user when passed user=username' do
@@ -305,10 +353,12 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: 'false', user: user.username }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'off',
-            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }])
+            'gates' => [{ 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false }],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
       end
 
@@ -321,13 +371,15 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: '30' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'conditional',
             'gates' => [
               { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
               { 'key' => 'percentage_of_time', 'value' => 30 }
-            ])
+            ],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
       end
 
@@ -340,13 +392,15 @@ RSpec.describe API::Features, stub_feature_flags: false do
           post api("/features/#{feature_name}", admin), params: { value: '74', key: 'percentage_of_actors' }
 
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
-          expect(json_response).to eq(
-            'name' => 'my_feature',
+          expect(json_response).to match(
+            'name' => feature_name,
             'state' => 'conditional',
             'gates' => [
               { 'key' => 'boolean', 'value' => false },
               { 'key' => 'percentage_of_actors', 'value' => 74 }
-            ])
+            ],
+            'definition' => known_feature_flag_definition_hash
+          )
         end
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/go_proxy_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/go_proxy_spec.rb
index 9d422ebbce2..d45e24241b2 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/go_proxy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/go_proxy_spec.rb
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::GoProxy do
 
   context 'with a non-existent project' do
     def get_resource(user = nil, **params)
-      get api("/projects/not%2fa%2fproject/packages/go/#{base}/@v/list", user, params)
+      get api("/projects/not%2fa%2fproject/packages/go/#{base}/@v/list", user, **params)
     end
 
     describe 'GET /projects/:id/packages/go/*module_name/@v/list' do
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::GoProxy do
   end
 
   def get_resource(user = nil, headers: {}, **params)
-    get api("/projects/#{project.id}/packages/go/#{module_name}/@v/#{resource}", user, params), headers: headers
+    get api("/projects/#{project.id}/packages/go/#{module_name}/@v/#{resource}", user, **params), headers: headers
   end
 
   def fmt_pseudo_version(prefix, commit)
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/add_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/add_spec.rb
index 3aaebb5095a..b39062f2e71 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/add_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/add_spec.rb
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Adding an AwardEmoji' do
       it_behaves_like 'a mutation that does not create an AwardEmoji'
 
       it_behaves_like 'a mutation that returns top-level errors',
-                      errors: ['Cannot award emoji to this resource']
+        errors: ['You cannot award emoji to this resource.']
     end
 
-    context 'when the given awardable an Awardable' do
+    context 'when the given awardable is an Awardable' do
       it 'creates an emoji' do
         expect do
           post_graphql_mutation(mutation, current_user: current_user)
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/toggle_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/toggle_spec.rb
index 6910ad80a11..170e7ff3b44 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/toggle_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/award_emojis/toggle_spec.rb
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Toggling an AwardEmoji' do
       it_behaves_like 'a mutation that does not create or destroy an AwardEmoji'
 
       it_behaves_like 'a mutation that returns top-level errors',
-                      errors: ['Cannot award emoji to this resource']
+        errors: ['You cannot award emoji to this resource.']
     end
 
     context 'when the given awardable is an Awardable' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/releases/update_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/releases/update_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..19320c3393c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/graphql/mutations/releases/update_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe 'Updating an existing release' do
+  include GraphqlHelpers
+  include Presentable
+
+  let_it_be(:public_user) { create(:user) }
+  let_it_be(:guest) { create(:user) }
+  let_it_be(:reporter) { create(:user) }
+  let_it_be(:developer) { create(:user) }
+  let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
+  let_it_be(:milestone_12_3) { create(:milestone, project: project, title: '12.3') }
+  let_it_be(:milestone_12_4) { create(:milestone, project: project, title: '12.4') }
+
+  let_it_be(:tag_name) { 'v1.1.0' }
+  let_it_be(:name) { 'Version 7.12.5'}
+  let_it_be(:description) { 'Release 7.12.5 :rocket:' }
+  let_it_be(:released_at) { '2018-12-10' }
+  let_it_be(:created_at) { '2018-11-05' }
+  let_it_be(:milestones) { [milestone_12_3, milestone_12_4] }
+
+  let_it_be(:release) do
+    create(:release, project: project, tag: tag_name, name: name,
+           description: description, released_at: Time.parse(released_at).utc,
+           created_at: Time.parse(created_at).utc, milestones: milestones)
+  end
+
+  let(:mutation_name) { :release_update }
+
+  let(:mutation_arguments) do
+    {
+      projectPath: project.full_path,
+      tagName: tag_name
+    }
+  end
+
+  let(:mutation) do
+    graphql_mutation(mutation_name, mutation_arguments, <<~FIELDS)
+      release {
+        tagName
+        name
+        description
+        releasedAt
+        createdAt
+        milestones {
+          nodes {
+            title
+          }
+        }
+      }
+      errors
+    FIELDS
+  end
+
+  let(:update_release) { post_graphql_mutation(mutation, current_user: current_user) }
+  let(:mutation_response) { graphql_mutation_response(mutation_name)&.with_indifferent_access }
+
+  let(:expected_attributes) do
+    {
+      tagName: tag_name,
+      name: name,
+      description: description,
+      releasedAt: Time.parse(released_at).utc.iso8601,
+      createdAt: Time.parse(created_at).utc.iso8601,
+      milestones: {
+        nodes: milestones.map { |m| { title: m.title } }
+      }
+    }.with_indifferent_access
+  end
+
+  around do |example|
+    freeze_time { example.run }
+  end
+
+  before do
+    project.add_guest(guest)
+    project.add_reporter(reporter)
+    project.add_developer(developer)
+
+    stub_default_url_options(host: 'www.example.com')
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'no errors' do
+    it 'returns no errors' do
+      update_release
+
+      expect(graphql_errors).not_to be_present
+    end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'top-level error with message' do |error_message|
+    it 'returns a top-level error with message' do
+      update_release
+
+      expect(mutation_response).to be_nil
+      expect(graphql_errors.count).to eq(1)
+      expect(graphql_errors.first['message']).to eq(error_message)
+    end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'errors-as-data with message' do |error_message|
+    it 'returns an error-as-data with message' do
+      update_release
+
+      expect(mutation_response[:release]).to be_nil
+      expect(mutation_response[:errors].count).to eq(1)
+      expect(mutation_response[:errors].first).to match(error_message)
+    end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'updates release fields' do |updates|
+    it_behaves_like 'no errors'
+
+    it 'updates the correct field and returns the release' do
+      update_release
+
+      expect(mutation_response[:release]).to include(expected_attributes.merge(updates).except(:milestones))
+
+      # Right now the milestones are returned in a non-deterministic order.
+      # Because of this, we need to test milestones separately to allow
+      # for them to be returned in any order.
+      # Once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/259012 has been
+      # fixed, this special milestone handling can be removed.
+      expected_milestones = expected_attributes.merge(updates)[:milestones]
+      expect(mutation_response[:release][:milestones][:nodes]).to match_array(expected_milestones[:nodes])
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when the current user has access to update releases' do
+    let(:current_user) { developer }
+
+    context 'name' do
+      context 'when a new name is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(name: 'Updated name') }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', name: 'Updated name'
+      end
+
+      context 'when null is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(name: nil) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', name: 'v1.1.0'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'description' do
+      context 'when a new description is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(description: 'Updated description') }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', description: 'Updated description'
+      end
+
+      context 'when null is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(description: nil) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', description: nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'releasedAt' do
+      context 'when no time zone is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(releasedAt: '2015-05-05') }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', releasedAt: Time.parse('2015-05-05').utc.iso8601
+      end
+
+      context 'when a local time zone is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(releasedAt: Time.parse('2015-05-05').in_time_zone('Hawaii').iso8601) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', releasedAt: Time.parse('2015-05-05').utc.iso8601
+      end
+
+      context 'when null is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(releasedAt: nil) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'top-level error with message', 'if the releasedAt argument is provided, it cannot be null'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'milestones' do
+      context 'when a new set of milestones is provided provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: ['12.3']) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', milestones: { nodes: [{ title: '12.3' }] }
+      end
+
+      context 'when an empty array is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: []) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'updates release fields', milestones: { nodes: [] }
+      end
+
+      context 'when null is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: nil) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'top-level error with message', 'if the milestones argument is provided, it cannot be null'
+      end
+
+      context 'when a non-existent milestone title is provided' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: ['not real']) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'errors-as-data with message', 'Milestone(s) not found: not real'
+      end
+
+      context 'when a milestone title from a different project is provided' do
+        let(:milestone_in_different_project) { create(:milestone, title: 'milestone in different project') }
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(milestones: [milestone_in_different_project.title]) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'errors-as-data with message', 'Milestone(s) not found: milestone in different project'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'validation' do
+      context 'when no updated fields are provided' do
+        it_behaves_like 'errors-as-data with message', 'params is empty'
+      end
+
+      context 'when the tag does not exist' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(tagName: 'not-a-real-tag') }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'errors-as-data with message', 'Tag does not exist'
+      end
+
+      context 'when the project does not exist' do
+        let(:mutation_arguments) { super().merge(projectPath: 'not/a/real/path') }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'top-level error with message', "The resource that you are attempting to access does not exist or you don't have permission to perform this action"
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context "when the current user doesn't have access to update releases" do
+    expected_error_message = "The resource that you are attempting to access does not exist or you don't have permission to perform this action"
+
+    context 'when the current user is a Reporter' do
+      let(:current_user) { reporter }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'top-level error with message', expected_error_message
+    end
+
+    context 'when the current user is a Guest' do
+      let(:current_user) { guest }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'top-level error with message', expected_error_message
+    end
+
+    context 'when the current user is a public user' do
+      let(:current_user) { public_user }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'top-level error with message', expected_error_message
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/group_clusters_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/group_clusters_spec.rb
index eb21ae9468c..f65f9384efa 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/group_clusters_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/group_clusters_spec.rb
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ RSpec.describe API::GroupClusters do
         expect(json_response['environment_scope']).to eq('*')
         expect(json_response['cluster_type']).to eq('group_type')
         expect(json_response['domain']).to eq('example.com')
+        expect(json_response['enabled']).to be_truthy
+        expect(json_response['managed']).to be_truthy
       end
 
       it 'returns group information' do
@@ -172,6 +174,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::GroupClusters do
         name: 'test-cluster',
         domain: 'domain.example.com',
         managed: false,
+        enabled: false,
         namespace_per_environment: false,
         platform_kubernetes_attributes: platform_kubernetes_attributes,
         management_project_id: management_project_id
@@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::GroupClusters do
           expect(cluster_result.name).to eq('test-cluster')
           expect(cluster_result.domain).to eq('domain.example.com')
           expect(cluster_result.managed).to be_falsy
+          expect(cluster_result.enabled).to be_falsy
           expect(cluster_result.management_project_id).to eq management_project_id
           expect(cluster_result.namespace_per_environment).to eq(false)
           expect(platform_kubernetes.rbac?).to be_truthy
@@ -342,7 +346,9 @@ RSpec.describe API::GroupClusters do
       {
         domain: domain,
         platform_kubernetes_attributes: platform_kubernetes_attributes,
-        management_project_id: management_project_id
+        management_project_id: management_project_id,
+        managed: false,
+        enabled: false
       }
     end
 
@@ -381,6 +387,8 @@ RSpec.describe API::GroupClusters do
         it 'updates cluster attributes' do
           expect(cluster.domain).to eq('new-domain.com')
           expect(cluster.management_project).to eq(management_project)
+          expect(cluster.managed).to be_falsy
+          expect(cluster.enabled).to be_falsy
         end
       end
 
@@ -394,6 +402,8 @@ RSpec.describe API::GroupClusters do
         it 'does not update cluster attributes' do
           expect(cluster.domain).to eq('old-domain.com')
           expect(cluster.management_project).to be_nil
+          expect(cluster.managed).to be_truthy
+          expect(cluster.enabled).to be_truthy
         end
 
         it 'returns validation errors' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/project_clusters_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/project_clusters_spec.rb
index 7b37862af74..f784f677c25 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/project_clusters_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/project_clusters_spec.rb
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ RSpec.describe API::ProjectClusters do
         expect(json_response['environment_scope']).to eq('*')
         expect(json_response['cluster_type']).to eq('project_type')
         expect(json_response['domain']).to eq('example.com')
+        expect(json_response['enabled']).to be_truthy
+        expect(json_response['managed']).to be_truthy
       end
 
       it 'returns project information' do
@@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::ProjectClusters do
         name: 'test-cluster',
         domain: 'domain.example.com',
         managed: false,
+        enabled: false,
         namespace_per_environment: false,
         platform_kubernetes_attributes: platform_kubernetes_attributes,
         management_project_id: management_project_id
@@ -202,6 +205,7 @@ RSpec.describe API::ProjectClusters do
           expect(cluster_result.name).to eq('test-cluster')
           expect(cluster_result.domain).to eq('domain.example.com')
           expect(cluster_result.managed).to be_falsy
+          expect(cluster_result.enabled).to be_falsy
           expect(cluster_result.management_project_id).to eq management_project_id
           expect(cluster_result.namespace_per_environment).to eq(false)
           expect(platform_kubernetes.rbac?).to be_truthy
@@ -337,7 +341,9 @@ RSpec.describe API::ProjectClusters do
       {
         domain: 'new-domain.com',
         platform_kubernetes_attributes: platform_kubernetes_attributes,
-        management_project_id: management_project_id
+        management_project_id: management_project_id,
+        managed: false,
+        enabled: false
       }
     end
 
@@ -373,6 +379,8 @@ RSpec.describe API::ProjectClusters do
         it 'updates cluster attributes' do
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
           expect(cluster.domain).to eq('new-domain.com')
+          expect(cluster.managed).to be_falsy
+          expect(cluster.enabled).to be_falsy
           expect(cluster.platform_kubernetes.namespace).to eq('new-namespace')
           expect(cluster.management_project).to eq(management_project)
         end
@@ -384,6 +392,8 @@ RSpec.describe API::ProjectClusters do
         it 'does not update cluster attributes' do
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:bad_request)
           expect(cluster.domain).not_to eq('new_domain.com')
+          expect(cluster.managed).to be_truthy
+          expect(cluster.enabled).to be_truthy
           expect(cluster.platform_kubernetes.namespace).not_to eq('invalid_namespace')
           expect(cluster.management_project).not_to eq(management_project)
         end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/usage_data_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/usage_data_spec.rb
index 4f4f386e9db..d44f179eed8 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/usage_data_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/usage_data_spec.rb
@@ -5,6 +5,87 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 RSpec.describe API::UsageData do
   let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
 
+  describe 'POST /usage_data/increment_counter' do
+    let(:endpoint) { '/usage_data/increment_counter' }
+    let(:known_event) { "#{known_event_prefix}_#{known_event_postfix}" }
+    let(:known_event_prefix) { "static_site_editor" }
+    let(:known_event_postfix) { 'commits' }
+    let(:unknown_event) { 'unknown' }
+
+    context 'without CSRF token' do
+      it 'returns forbidden' do
+        stub_feature_flags(usage_data_api: true)
+        allow(Gitlab::RequestForgeryProtection).to receive(:verified?).and_return(false)
+
+        post api(endpoint, user), params: { event: known_event }
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:forbidden)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'usage_data_api feature not enabled' do
+      it 'returns not_found' do
+        stub_feature_flags(usage_data_api: false)
+
+        post api(endpoint, user), params: { event: known_event }
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:not_found)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'without authentication' do
+      it 'returns 401 response' do
+        post api(endpoint), params: { event: known_event }
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:unauthorized)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with authentication' do
+      before do
+        stub_feature_flags(usage_data_api: true)
+        stub_feature_flags("usage_data_#{known_event}" => true)
+        stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: true)
+        allow(Gitlab::RequestForgeryProtection).to receive(:verified?).and_return(true)
+      end
+
+      context 'when event is missing from params' do
+        it 'returns bad request' do
+          post api(endpoint, user), params: {}
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:bad_request)
+        end
+      end
+
+      %w[merge_requests commits].each do |postfix|
+        context 'with correct params' do
+          let(:known_event_postfix) { postfix }
+
+          it 'returns status ok' do
+            expect(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::BaseCounter).to receive(:count).with(known_event_postfix)
+            post api(endpoint, user), params: { event: known_event }
+
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with unknown event' do
+        before do
+          skip_feature_flags_yaml_validation
+        end
+
+        it 'returns status ok' do
+          expect(Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::BaseCounter).not_to receive(:count)
+
+          post api(endpoint, user), params: { event: unknown_event }
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'POST /usage_data/increment_unique_users' do
     let(:endpoint) { '/usage_data/increment_unique_users' }
     let(:known_event) { 'g_compliance_dashboard' }
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb
index 98840d6238a..381e0b03589 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb
@@ -2510,6 +2510,98 @@ RSpec.describe API::Users, :do_not_mock_admin_mode do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'approve pending user' do
+    shared_examples '404' do
+      it 'returns 404' do
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:not_found)
+        expect(json_response['message']).to eq('404 User Not Found')
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'POST /users/:id/approve' do
+      subject(:approve) { post api("/users/#{user_id}/approve", api_user) }
+
+      let_it_be(:pending_user) { create(:user, :blocked_pending_approval) }
+      let_it_be(:deactivated_user) { create(:user, :deactivated) }
+      let_it_be(:blocked_user) { create(:user, :blocked) }
+
+      context 'performed by a non-admin user' do
+        let(:api_user) { user }
+        let(:user_id) { pending_user.id }
+
+        it 'is not authorized to perform the action' do
+          expect { approve }.not_to change { pending_user.reload.state }
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:forbidden)
+          expect(json_response['message']).to eq('You are not allowed to approve a user')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'performed by an admin user' do
+        let(:api_user) { admin }
+
+        context 'for a deactivated user' do
+          let(:user_id) { deactivated_user.id }
+
+          it 'does not approve a deactivated user' do
+            expect { approve }.not_to change { deactivated_user.reload.state }
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:conflict)
+            expect(json_response['message']).to eq('The user you are trying to approve is not pending an approval')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'for an pending approval user' do
+          let(:user_id) { pending_user.id }
+
+          it 'returns 201' do
+            expect { approve }.to change { pending_user.reload.state }.to('active')
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:created)
+            expect(json_response['message']).to eq('Success')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'for an active user' do
+          let(:user_id) { user.id }
+
+          it 'returns 201' do
+            expect { approve }.not_to change { user.reload.state }
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:conflict)
+            expect(json_response['message']).to eq('The user you are trying to approve is not pending an approval')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'for a blocked user' do
+          let(:user_id) { blocked_user.id }
+
+          it 'returns 403' do
+            expect { approve }.not_to change { blocked_user.reload.state }
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:conflict)
+            expect(json_response['message']).to eq('The user you are trying to approve is not pending an approval')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'for a ldap blocked user' do
+          let(:user_id) { ldap_blocked_user.id }
+
+          it 'returns 403' do
+            expect { approve }.not_to change { ldap_blocked_user.reload.state }
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:conflict)
+            expect(json_response['message']).to eq('The user you are trying to approve is not pending an approval')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'for a user that does not exist' do
+          let(:user_id) { non_existing_record_id }
+
+          before do
+            approve
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like '404'
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'POST /users/:id/block' do
     let(:blocked_user) { create(:user, state: 'blocked') }
 
diff --git a/spec/requests/lfs_http_spec.rb b/spec/requests/lfs_http_spec.rb
index 48d125a37c3..36bad1a66cb 100644
--- a/spec/requests/lfs_http_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/lfs_http_spec.rb
@@ -219,10 +219,12 @@ RSpec.describe 'Git LFS API and storage' do
   describe 'when handling LFS batch request' do
     let(:update_lfs_permissions) { }
     let(:update_user_permissions) { }
+    let(:lfs_chunked_encoding) { true }
 
     before do
       update_lfs_permissions
       update_user_permissions
+      stub_feature_flags(lfs_chunked_encoding: lfs_chunked_encoding)
       post_lfs_json batch_url(project), body, headers
     end
 
@@ -524,7 +526,24 @@ RSpec.describe 'Git LFS API and storage' do
           expect(json_response['objects']).to be_kind_of(Array)
           expect(json_response['objects'].first).to include(sample_object)
           expect(json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['href']).to eq(objects_url(project, sample_oid, sample_size))
-          expect(json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['header']).to include('Content-Type' => 'application/octet-stream')
+
+          headers = json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['header']
+          expect(headers['Content-Type']).to eq('application/octet-stream')
+          expect(headers['Transfer-Encoding']).to eq('chunked')
+        end
+
+        context 'when lfs_chunked_encoding feature is disabled' do
+          let(:lfs_chunked_encoding) { false }
+
+          it 'responds with upload hypermedia link' do
+            expect(json_response['objects']).to be_kind_of(Array)
+            expect(json_response['objects'].first).to include(sample_object)
+            expect(json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['href']).to eq(objects_url(project, sample_oid, sample_size))
+
+            headers = json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['header']
+            expect(headers['Content-Type']).to eq('application/octet-stream')
+            expect(headers['Transfer-Encoding']).to be_nil
+          end
         end
 
         it_behaves_like 'process authorization header', renew_authorization: renew_authorization
@@ -548,7 +567,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Git LFS API and storage' do
                 expect(lfs_object.projects.pluck(:id)).not_to include(project.id)
                 expect(lfs_object.projects.pluck(:id)).to include(other_project.id)
                 expect(json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['href']).to eq(objects_url(project, sample_oid, sample_size))
-                expect(json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['header']).to include('Content-Type' => 'application/octet-stream')
+
+                headers = json_response['objects'].first['actions']['upload']['header']
+                expect(headers['Content-Type']).to eq('application/octet-stream')
+                expect(headers['Transfer-Encoding']).to eq('chunked')
               end
 
               it_behaves_like 'process authorization header', renew_authorization: true
@@ -589,7 +611,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Git LFS API and storage' do
 
               expect(json_response['objects'].last).to include(non_existing_object)
               expect(json_response['objects'].last['actions']['upload']['href']).to eq(objects_url(project, non_existing_object_oid, non_existing_object_size))
-              expect(json_response['objects'].last['actions']['upload']['header']).to include('Content-Type' => 'application/octet-stream')
+
+              headers = json_response['objects'].last['actions']['upload']['header']
+              expect(headers['Content-Type']).to eq('application/octet-stream')
+              expect(headers['Transfer-Encoding']).to eq('chunked')
             end
 
             it_behaves_like 'process authorization header', renew_authorization: true
diff --git a/spec/requests/rack_attack_global_spec.rb b/spec/requests/rack_attack_global_spec.rb
index 805ac5a9118..c2e68df2c40 100644
--- a/spec/requests/rack_attack_global_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/rack_attack_global_spec.rb
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Rack Attack global throttles' do
         let(:request_jobs_url) { '/api/v4/jobs/request' }
         let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner) }
 
-        it 'does not cont as unauthenticated' do
+        it 'does not count as unauthenticated' do
           (1 + requests_per_period).times do
             post request_jobs_url, params: { token: runner.token }
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
@@ -114,6 +114,17 @@ RSpec.describe 'Rack Attack global throttles' do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when the request is to a health endpoint' do
+        let(:health_endpoint) { '/-/metrics' }
+
+        it 'does not throttle the requests' do
+          (1 + requests_per_period).times do
+            get health_endpoint
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
       it 'logs RackAttack info into structured logs' do
         requests_per_period.times do
           get url_that_does_not_require_authentication
@@ -133,6 +144,14 @@ RSpec.describe 'Rack Attack global throttles' do
 
         get url_that_does_not_require_authentication
       end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'tracking when dry-run mode is set' do
+        let(:throttle_name) { 'throttle_unauthenticated' }
+
+        def do_request
+          get url_that_does_not_require_authentication
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when the throttle is disabled' do
@@ -231,6 +250,10 @@ RSpec.describe 'Rack Attack global throttles' do
 
       let(:post_params) { { user: { login: 'username', password: 'password' } } }
 
+      def do_request
+        post protected_path_that_does_not_require_authentication, params: post_params
+      end
+
       before do
         settings_to_set[:throttle_protected_paths_requests_per_period] = requests_per_period # 1
         settings_to_set[:throttle_protected_paths_period_in_seconds] = period_in_seconds # 10_000
@@ -244,7 +267,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Rack Attack global throttles' do
 
         it 'allows requests over the rate limit' do
           (1 + requests_per_period).times do
-            post protected_path_that_does_not_require_authentication, params: post_params
+            do_request
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
           end
         end
@@ -258,12 +281,16 @@ RSpec.describe 'Rack Attack global throttles' do
 
         it 'rejects requests over the rate limit' do
           requests_per_period.times do
-            post protected_path_that_does_not_require_authentication, params: post_params
+            do_request
             expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
           end
 
           expect_rejection { post protected_path_that_does_not_require_authentication, params: post_params }
         end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'tracking when dry-run mode is set' do
+          let(:throttle_name) { 'throttle_unauthenticated_protected_paths' }
+        end
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/lint/last_keyword_argument_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/lint/last_keyword_argument_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f942390569b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/lint/last_keyword_argument_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/lint/last_keyword_argument'
+
+RSpec.describe RuboCop::Cop::Lint::LastKeywordArgument, type: :rubocop do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  before do
+    described_class.instance_variable_set(:@keyword_warnings, nil)
+  end
+
+  context 'deprecation files does not exist' do
+    before do
+      allow(Dir).to receive(:glob).and_return([])
+      allow(File).to receive(:exist?).and_return(false)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not register an offense' do
+      expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE)
+        users.call(params)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'deprecation files does exist' do
+    let(:create_spec_yaml) do
+      <<~YAML
+      ---
+      test_mutations/boards/lists/create#resolve_with_proper_permissions_backlog_list_creates_one_and_only_one_backlog:
+      - |
+        DEPRECATION WARNING: /Users/tkuah/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/batch-loader-1.4.0/lib/batch_loader/graphql.rb:38: warning: Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated; maybe ** should be added to the call
+        /Users/tkuah/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/batch-loader-1.4.0/lib/batch_loader.rb:26: warning: The called method `batch' is defined here
+      test_mutations/boards/lists/create#ready?_raises_an_error_if_required_arguments_are_missing:
+      - |
+        DEPRECATION WARNING: /Users/tkuah/code/ee-gdk/gitlab/create_service.rb:1: warning: Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated; maybe ** should be added to the call
+        /Users/tkuah/code/ee-gdk/gitlab/user.rb:17: warning: The called method `call' is defined here
+      YAML
+    end
+
+    let(:projects_spec_yaml) do
+      <<~YAML
+      ---
+      test_api/projects_get_/projects_when_unauthenticated_behaves_like_projects_response_returns_an_array_of_projects:
+      - |
+        DEPRECATION WARNING: /Users/tkuah/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/state_machines-activerecord-0.6.0/lib/state_machines/integrations/active_record.rb:511: warning: Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated; maybe ** should be added to the call
+        /Users/tkuah/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/activerecord-6.0.3.3/lib/active_record/suppressor.rb:43: warning: The called method `save' is defined here
+      - |
+        DEPRECATION WARNING: /Users/tkuah/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/rack-2.2.3/lib/rack/builder.rb:158: warning: Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated; maybe ** should be added to the call
+        /Users/tkuah/.rbenv/versions/2.7.2/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/grape-1.4.0/lib/grape/middleware/error.rb:30: warning: The called method `initialize' is defined here
+      YAML
+    end
+
+    before do
+      allow(Dir).to receive(:glob).and_return(['deprecations/service/create_spec.yml', 'deprecations/api/projects_spec.yml'])
+      allow(File).to receive(:read).and_return(create_spec_yaml, projects_spec_yaml)
+    end
+
+    it 'registers an offense' do
+      expect_offense(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.call(params)
+                   ^^^^^^ Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated
+      SOURCE
+
+      expect_correction(<<~SOURCE)
+        users.call(**params)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+
+    it 'registers an offense and corrects by converting hash to kwarg' do
+      expect_offense(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.call(id, { a: :b, c: :d })
+                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated
+      SOURCE
+
+      expect_correction(<<~SOURCE)
+        users.call(id, a: :b, c: :d)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+
+    it 'registers an offense and corrects by converting splat to double splat' do
+      expect_offense(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.call(id, *params)
+                       ^^^^^^^ Using the last argument as keyword parameters is deprecated
+      SOURCE
+
+      expect_correction(<<~SOURCE)
+        users.call(id, **params)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+
+    it 'does not register an offense if already a kwarg', :aggregate_failures do
+      expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.call(**params)
+      SOURCE
+
+      expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.call(id, a: :b, c: :d)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+
+    it 'does not register an offense if the method name does not match' do
+      expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.process(params)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+
+    it 'does not register an offense if the line number does not match' do
+      expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, 'create_service.rb')
+        users.process
+        users.call(params)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+
+    it 'does not register an offense if the filename does not match' do
+      expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, 'update_service.rb')
+        users.call(params)
+      SOURCE
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity_spec.rb
index 3f7d5542ae8..9f734c08ef4 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity_spec.rb
@@ -285,54 +285,34 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestWidgetEntity do
   end
 
   describe 'user callouts' do
-    context 'when suggest pipeline feature is enabled' do
-      subject { described_class.new(resource, request: request, experiment_enabled: :suggest_pipeline).as_json }
+    subject { described_class.new(resource, request: request).as_json }
 
-      it 'provides a valid path value for user callout path' do
-        expect(subject[:user_callouts_path]).to eq '/-/user_callouts'
-      end
-
-      it 'provides a valid value for suggest pipeline feature id' do
-        expect(subject[:suggest_pipeline_feature_id]).to eq described_class::SUGGEST_PIPELINE
-      end
-
-      it 'provides a valid value for if it is dismissed' do
-        expect(subject[:is_dismissed_suggest_pipeline]).to be(false)
-      end
-
-      context 'when the suggest pipeline has been dismissed' do
-        before do
-          create(:user_callout, user: user, feature_name: described_class::SUGGEST_PIPELINE)
-        end
-
-        it 'indicates suggest pipeline has been dismissed' do
-          expect(subject[:is_dismissed_suggest_pipeline]).to be(true)
-        end
-      end
+    it 'provides a valid path value for user callout path' do
+      expect(subject[:user_callouts_path]).to eq '/-/user_callouts'
+    end
 
-      context 'when user is not logged in' do
-        let(:request) { double('request', current_user: nil, project: project) }
+    it 'provides a valid value for suggest pipeline feature id' do
+      expect(subject[:suggest_pipeline_feature_id]).to eq described_class::SUGGEST_PIPELINE
+    end
 
-        it 'returns a blank is dismissed value' do
-          expect(subject[:is_dismissed_suggest_pipeline]).to be_nil
-        end
-      end
+    it 'provides a valid value for if it is dismissed' do
+      expect(subject[:is_dismissed_suggest_pipeline]).to be(false)
     end
 
-    context 'when suggest pipeline feature is not enabled' do
+    context 'when the suggest pipeline has been dismissed' do
       before do
-        stub_feature_flags(suggest_pipeline: false)
+        create(:user_callout, user: user, feature_name: described_class::SUGGEST_PIPELINE)
       end
 
-      it 'provides no valid value for user callout path' do
-        expect(subject[:user_callouts_path]).to be_nil
+      it 'indicates suggest pipeline has been dismissed' do
+        expect(subject[:is_dismissed_suggest_pipeline]).to be(true)
       end
+    end
 
-      it 'provides no valid value for suggest pipeline feature id' do
-        expect(subject[:suggest_pipeline_feature_id]).to be_nil
-      end
+    context 'when user is not logged in' do
+      let(:request) { double('request', current_user: nil, project: project) }
 
-      it 'provides no valid value for if it is dismissed' do
+      it 'returns a blank is dismissed value' do
         expect(subject[:is_dismissed_suggest_pipeline]).to be_nil
       end
     end
@@ -371,4 +351,18 @@ RSpec.describe MergeRequestWidgetEntity do
   it 'has security_reports_docs_path' do
     expect(subject[:security_reports_docs_path]).not_to be_nil
   end
+
+  describe 'has source_project_default_url' do
+    it 'returns the default url to the source project' do
+      expect(subject[:source_project_default_url]).to eq project.http_url_to_repo
+    end
+
+    context 'when source project is nil' do
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        allow(resource).to receive(:source_project).and_return(nil)
+
+        expect(subject[:source_project_default_url]).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/applications/create_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/applications/create_service_spec.rb
index f93ae2c62f3..f3b420510a6 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/applications/create_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/applications/create_service_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
 
   let(:cluster) { create(:cluster, :project, :provided_by_gcp) }
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let(:params) { { application: 'helm' } }
+  let(:params) { { application: 'ingress' } }
   let(:service) { described_class.new(cluster, user, params) }
 
   describe '#execute' do
@@ -23,16 +23,16 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
         subject
 
         cluster.reload
-      end.to change(cluster, :application_helm)
+      end.to change(cluster, :application_ingress)
     end
 
     context 'application already installed' do
-      let!(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installed, cluster: cluster) }
+      let!(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installed, cluster: cluster) }
 
       it 'does not create a new application' do
         expect do
           subject
-        end.not_to change(Clusters::Applications::Helm, :count)
+        end.not_to change(Clusters::Applications::Ingress, :count)
       end
 
       it 'schedules an upgrade for the application' do
@@ -43,10 +43,6 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
     end
 
     context 'known applications' do
-      before do
-        create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installed, cluster: cluster)
-      end
-
       context 'ingress application' do
         let(:params) do
           {
@@ -215,19 +211,17 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
 
       using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
 
-      where(:application, :association, :allowed, :pre_create_helm, :pre_create_ingress) do
-        'helm'       | :application_helm       | true | false | false
-        'ingress'    | :application_ingress    | true | true | false
-        'runner'     | :application_runner     | true | true | false
-        'prometheus' | :application_prometheus | true | true | false
-        'jupyter'    | :application_jupyter    | true | true | true
+      where(:application, :association, :allowed, :pre_create_ingress) do
+        'ingress'    | :application_ingress    | true | false
+        'runner'     | :application_runner     | true | false
+        'prometheus' | :application_prometheus | true | false
+        'jupyter'    | :application_jupyter    | true | true
       end
 
       with_them do
         before do
           klass = "Clusters::Applications::#{application.titleize}"
           allow_any_instance_of(klass.constantize).to receive(:make_scheduled!).and_call_original
-          create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installed, cluster: cluster) if pre_create_helm
           create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installed, cluster: cluster, external_hostname: 'example.com') if pre_create_ingress
         end
 
@@ -252,7 +246,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
         it 'makes the application scheduled' do
           expect do
             subject
-          end.to change { Clusters::Applications::Helm.with_status(:scheduled).count }.by(1)
+          end.to change { Clusters::Applications::Ingress.with_status(:scheduled).count }.by(1)
         end
 
         it 'schedules an install via worker' do
@@ -266,7 +260,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
       end
 
       context 'when application is associated with a cluster' do
-        let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installable, cluster: cluster) }
+        let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installable, cluster: cluster) }
         let(:worker_arguments) { [application.name, application.id] }
 
         it_behaves_like 'installable applications'
@@ -280,7 +274,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
     end
 
     context 'when installation is already in progress' do
-      let!(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_helm, :installing, cluster: cluster) }
+      let!(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :installing, cluster: cluster) }
 
       it 'raises an exception' do
         expect { subject }
@@ -295,7 +289,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Applications::CreateService do
 
     context 'when application is installed' do
       %i(installed updated).each do |status|
-        let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_helm, status, cluster: cluster) }
+        let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_ingress, status, cluster: cluster) }
 
         it 'schedules an upgrade via worker' do
           expect(ClusterUpgradeAppWorker)
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/aws/fetch_credentials_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/aws/fetch_credentials_service_spec.rb
index 361a947f634..4b9458d277b 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/aws/fetch_credentials_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/aws/fetch_credentials_service_spec.rb
@@ -60,9 +60,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Aws::FetchCredentialsService do
         subject { described_class.new(provision_role, provider: provider).execute }
 
         before do
-          allow(File).to receive(:read)
-            .with(Rails.root.join('vendor', 'aws', 'iam', 'eks_cluster_read_only_policy.json'))
-            .and_return(session_policy)
+          stub_file_read(Rails.root.join('vendor', 'aws', 'iam', 'eks_cluster_read_only_policy.json'), content: session_policy)
         end
 
         it { is_expected.to eq assumed_role_credentials }
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/aws/provision_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/aws/provision_service_spec.rb
index 52612e5ac40..5efac29ec1e 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/aws/provision_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/aws/provision_service_spec.rb
@@ -42,9 +42,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Aws::ProvisionService do
       allow(provider).to receive(:api_client)
         .and_return(client)
 
-      allow(File).to receive(:read)
-        .with(Rails.root.join('vendor', 'aws', 'cloudformation', 'eks_cluster.yaml'))
-        .and_return(cloudformation_template)
+      stub_file_read(Rails.root.join('vendor', 'aws', 'cloudformation', 'eks_cluster.yaml'), content: cloudformation_template)
     end
 
     it 'updates the provider status to :creating and configures the provider with credentials' do
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/cleanup/app_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/cleanup/app_service_spec.rb
index ba1be7448a4..ea1194d2100 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/cleanup/app_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/cleanup/app_service_spec.rb
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Cleanup::AppService do
 
         it 'only uninstalls apps that are not dependencies for other installed apps' do
           expect(Clusters::Applications::UninstallWorker)
-            .not_to receive(:perform_async).with(helm.name, helm.id)
+            .to receive(:perform_async).with(helm.name, helm.id)
+            .and_call_original
 
           expect(Clusters::Applications::UninstallWorker)
             .not_to receive(:perform_async).with(ingress.name, ingress.id)
@@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ RSpec.describe Clusters::Cleanup::AppService do
 
         it 'logs application uninstalls and next execution' do
           expect(logger).to receive(:info)
-            .with(log_meta.merge(event: :uninstalling_app, application: kind_of(String))).twice
+            .with(log_meta.merge(event: :uninstalling_app, application: kind_of(String))).exactly(3).times
           expect(logger).to receive(:info)
             .with(log_meta.merge(event: :scheduling_execution, next_execution: 1))
 
diff --git a/spec/services/event_create_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/event_create_service_spec.rb
index 3c67c15f10a..17b2c7b38e1 100644
--- a/spec/services/event_create_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/event_create_service_spec.rb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ RSpec.describe EventCreateService do
       tracking_params = { event_action: event_action, date_from: Date.yesterday, date_to: Date.today }
 
       expect { subject }
-        .to change { Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::TrackUniqueEvents.count_unique_events(tracking_params) }
+        .to change { Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::TrackUniqueEvents.count_unique_events(**tracking_params) }
         .by(1)
     end
   end
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ RSpec.describe EventCreateService do
         counter_class = Gitlab::UsageDataCounters::TrackUniqueEvents
         tracking_params = { event_action: event_action, date_from: Date.yesterday, date_to: Date.today }
 
-        expect { subject }.not_to change { counter_class.count_unique_events(tracking_params) }
+        expect { subject }.not_to change { counter_class.count_unique_events(**tracking_params) }
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/services/metrics/dashboard/clone_dashboard_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/metrics/dashboard/clone_dashboard_service_spec.rb
index 728b343b801..b326fc1726d 100644
--- a/spec/services/metrics/dashboard/clone_dashboard_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/metrics/dashboard/clone_dashboard_service_spec.rb
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ RSpec.describe Metrics::Dashboard::CloneDashboardService, :use_clean_rails_memor
         it 'extends dashboard template path to absolute url' do
           allow(::Files::CreateService).to receive(:new).and_return(double(execute: { status: :success }))
 
-          expect(File).to receive(:read).with(Rails.root.join('config/prometheus/common_metrics.yml')).and_return('')
+          expect_file_read(Rails.root.join('config/prometheus/common_metrics.yml'), content: '')
 
           service_call
         end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/fork_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/fork_service_spec.rb
index 555f2f5a5e5..6eadcc48d5b 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/fork_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/fork_service_spec.rb
@@ -344,10 +344,6 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::ForkService do
     let(:fork_from_project) { create(:project, :public) }
     let(:forker) { create(:user) }
 
-    before do
-      stub_feature_flags(object_pools: true)
-    end
-
     context 'when no pool exists' do
       it 'creates a new object pool' do
         forked_project = fork_project(fork_from_project, forker, using_service: true)
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_access_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_access_service_spec.rb
index 02f80988dd1..90167ffebed 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_access_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_access_service_spec.rb
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveAccessService do
       it 'does not remove remaining memberships' do
         target_project.add_maintainer(maintainer_user)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_access, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_access, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_access.project_members.count).not_to eq 0
       end
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveAccessService do
       it 'does not remove remaining group links' do
         target_project.project_group_links.create!(group: maintainer_group, group_access: Gitlab::Access::MAINTAINER)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_access, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_access, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_access.project_group_links.count).not_to eq 0
       end
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveAccessService do
       it 'does not remove remaining authorizations' do
         target_project.add_developer(developer_user)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_access, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_access, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_access.project_authorizations.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_deploy_keys_projects_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_deploy_keys_projects_service_spec.rb
index e69b4dd4fc7..bd93b80f712 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_deploy_keys_projects_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_deploy_keys_projects_service_spec.rb
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveDeployKeysProjectsService do
       it 'does not remove remaining deploy keys projects' do
         target_project.deploy_keys << project_with_deploy_keys.deploy_keys.first
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_deploy_keys, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_deploy_keys, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_deploy_keys.deploy_keys_projects.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_lfs_objects_projects_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_lfs_objects_projects_service_spec.rb
index b73286fba9a..e3df5fed9cf 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_lfs_objects_projects_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_lfs_objects_projects_service_spec.rb
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveLfsObjectsProjectsService do
       it 'does not remove remaining lfs objects' do
         target_project.lfs_objects << project_with_lfs_objects.lfs_objects.first(2)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_lfs_objects, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_lfs_objects, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_lfs_objects.lfs_objects.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_notification_settings_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_notification_settings_service_spec.rb
index 7c9f1dd30d2..e381ae7590f 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_notification_settings_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_notification_settings_service_spec.rb
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveNotificationSettingsService do
       let(:options) { { remove_remaining_elements: false } }
 
       it 'does not remove remaining notification settings' do
-        subject.execute(project_with_notifications, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_notifications, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_notifications.notification_settings.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_project_authorizations_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_project_authorizations_service_spec.rb
index a37b4d807a0..d47b13ca939 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_project_authorizations_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_project_authorizations_service_spec.rb
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveProjectAuthorizationsService do
         target_project.add_maintainer(developer_user)
         target_project.add_developer(reporter_user)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_users, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_users, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_users.project_authorizations.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_project_group_links_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_project_group_links_service_spec.rb
index 6304eded8d3..1fca96a0367 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_project_group_links_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_project_group_links_service_spec.rb
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveProjectGroupLinksService do
         target_project.project_group_links.create!(group: maintainer_group, group_access: Gitlab::Access::MAINTAINER)
         target_project.project_group_links.create!(group: developer_group, group_access: Gitlab::Access::DEVELOPER)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_groups, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_groups, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_groups.project_group_links.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/move_project_members_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/move_project_members_service_spec.rb
index f14f00e3866..8fbd0ba3270 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/move_project_members_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/move_project_members_service_spec.rb
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::MoveProjectMembersService do
         target_project.add_maintainer(developer_user)
         target_project.add_developer(reporter_user)
 
-        subject.execute(project_with_users, options)
+        subject.execute(project_with_users, **options)
 
         expect(project_with_users.project_members.count).not_to eq 0
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/open_issues_count_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/open_issues_count_service_spec.rb
index 294c9adcc92..c739fea5ecf 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/open_issues_count_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/open_issues_count_service_spec.rb
@@ -10,14 +10,6 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::OpenIssuesCountService, :use_clean_rails_memory_store_c
   it_behaves_like 'a counter caching service'
 
   describe '#count' do
-    it 'does not count test cases' do
-      create(:issue, :opened, project: project)
-      create(:incident, :opened, project: project)
-      create(:quality_test_case, :opened, project: project)
-
-      expect(described_class.new(project).count).to eq(2)
-    end
-
     context 'when user is nil' do
       it 'does not include confidential issues in the issue count' do
         create(:issue, :opened, project: project)
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/update_pages_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/update_pages_service_spec.rb
index d2c6c0eb971..0b12a0c14e4 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/update_pages_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/update_pages_service_spec.rb
@@ -105,16 +105,6 @@ RSpec.describe Projects::UpdatePagesService do
         end
       end
 
-      it 'does not create deployment when zip_pages_deployments feature flag is disabled' do
-        stub_feature_flags(zip_pages_deployments: false)
-
-        expect do
-          expect(execute).to eq(:success)
-        end.not_to change { project.pages_deployments.count }
-
-        expect(project.pages_metadatum.reload.pages_deployment_id).to be_nil
-      end
-
       it 'limits pages size' do
         stub_application_setting(max_pages_size: 1)
         expect(execute).not_to eq(:success)
diff --git a/spec/services/releases/create_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/releases/create_service_spec.rb
index b9294182883..7287825a0be 100644
--- a/spec/services/releases/create_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/releases/create_service_spec.rb
@@ -167,28 +167,47 @@ RSpec.describe Releases::CreateService do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when no milestone is passed in' do
-      it 'creates a release without a milestone tied to it' do
-        expect(params.key?(:milestones)).to be_falsey
+    context 'no milestone association behavior' do
+      let(:title_1) { 'v1.0' }
+      let(:title_2) { 'v1.0-rc' }
+      let!(:milestone_1) { create(:milestone, :active, project: project, title: title_1) }
+      let!(:milestone_2) { create(:milestone, :active, project: project, title: title_2) }
 
-        service.execute
-        release = project.releases.last
+      context 'when no milestones parameter is passed' do
+        it 'creates a release without a milestone tied to it' do
+          expect(service.param_for_milestone_titles_provided?).to be_falsey
 
-        expect(release.milestones).to be_empty
+          service.execute
+          release = project.releases.last
+
+          expect(release.milestones).to be_empty
+        end
+
+        it 'does not create any new MilestoneRelease object' do
+          expect { service.execute }.not_to change { MilestoneRelease.count }
+        end
       end
 
-      it 'does not create any new MilestoneRelease object' do
-        expect { service.execute }.not_to change { MilestoneRelease.count }
+      context 'when an empty array is passed as the milestones parameter' do
+        it 'creates a release without a milestone tied to it' do
+          service = described_class.new(project, user, params.merge!({ milestones: [] }))
+          service.execute
+          release = project.releases.last
+
+          expect(release.milestones).to be_empty
+        end
       end
-    end
 
-    context 'when an empty value is passed as a milestone' do
-      it 'creates a release without a milestone tied to it' do
-        service = described_class.new(project, user, params.merge!({ milestones: [] }))
-        service.execute
-        release = project.releases.last
+      context 'when nil is passed as the milestones parameter' do
+        it 'creates a release without a milestone tied to it' do
+          expect(service.param_for_milestone_titles_provided?).to be_falsey
 
-        expect(release.milestones).to be_empty
+          service = described_class.new(project, user, params.merge!({ milestones: nil }))
+          service.execute
+          release = project.releases.last
+
+          expect(release.milestones).to be_empty
+        end
       end
     end
   end
@@ -217,7 +236,7 @@ RSpec.describe Releases::CreateService do
       let(:released_at) { 3.weeks.ago }
 
       it 'does not execute CreateEvidenceWorker' do
-        expect { subject }.not_to change(CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs, :size)
+        expect { subject }.not_to change(Releases::CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs, :size)
       end
 
       it 'does not create an Evidence object', :sidekiq_inline do
@@ -316,7 +335,7 @@ RSpec.describe Releases::CreateService do
       end
 
       it 'queues CreateEvidenceWorker' do
-        expect { subject }.to change(CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs, :size).by(1)
+        expect { subject }.to change(Releases::CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs, :size).by(1)
       end
 
       it 'creates Evidence', :sidekiq_inline do
@@ -341,18 +360,12 @@ RSpec.describe Releases::CreateService do
     context 'upcoming release' do
       let(:released_at) { 1.day.from_now }
 
-      it 'queues CreateEvidenceWorker' do
-        expect { subject }.to change(CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs, :size).by(1)
-      end
-
-      it 'queues CreateEvidenceWorker at the released_at timestamp' do
-        subject
-
-        expect(CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs.last['at'].to_i).to eq(released_at.to_i)
+      it 'does not execute CreateEvidenceWorker' do
+        expect { subject }.not_to change(Releases::CreateEvidenceWorker.jobs, :size)
       end
 
-      it 'creates Evidence', :sidekiq_inline do
-        expect { subject }.to change(Releases::Evidence, :count).by(1)
+      it 'does not create an Evidence object', :sidekiq_inline do
+        expect { subject }.not_to change(Releases::Evidence, :count)
       end
 
       it 'is not a historical release' do
@@ -366,8 +379,6 @@ RSpec.describe Releases::CreateService do
 
         expect(last_release.upcoming_release?).to be_truthy
       end
-
-      include_examples 'uses the right pipeline for evidence'
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/suggestions/apply_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/suggestions/apply_service_spec.rb
index d8ade0fbbda..3e7594bd30f 100644
--- a/spec/services/suggestions/apply_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/suggestions/apply_service_spec.rb
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ RSpec.describe Suggestions::ApplyService do
     position_args = args.slice(:old_path, :new_path, :old_line, :new_line)
     content_args = args.slice(:from_content, :to_content)
 
-    position = build_position(position_args)
+    position = build_position(**position_args)
 
     diff_note = create(:diff_note_on_merge_request,
                        noteable: merge_request,
diff --git a/spec/spec_helper.rb b/spec/spec_helper.rb
index 38e3f851116..e8405934f62 100644
--- a/spec/spec_helper.rb
+++ b/spec/spec_helper.rb
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ if $".include?(File.expand_path('fast_spec_helper.rb', __dir__))
   abort 'Aborting...'
 end
 
+require './spec/deprecation_toolkit_env'
+
 require './spec/simplecov_env'
 SimpleCovEnv.start!
 
@@ -134,6 +136,7 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
   config.include NextFoundInstanceOf
   config.include NextInstanceOf
   config.include TestEnv
+  config.include FileReadHelpers
   config.include Devise::Test::ControllerHelpers, type: :controller
   config.include Devise::Test::IntegrationHelpers, type: :feature
   config.include LoginHelpers, type: :feature
@@ -215,10 +218,6 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
       stub_feature_flags(vue_issuable_sidebar: false)
       stub_feature_flags(vue_issuable_epic_sidebar: false)
 
-      # The following can be removed once we are confident the
-      # unified diff lines works as expected
-      stub_feature_flags(unified_diff_lines: false)
-
       # Merge request widget GraphQL requests are disabled in the tests
       # for now whilst we migrate as much as we can over the GraphQL
       stub_feature_flags(merge_request_widget_graphql: false)
@@ -238,6 +237,8 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
       # See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/33867
       stub_feature_flags(file_identifier_hash: false)
 
+      stub_feature_flags(unified_diff_components: false)
+
       allow(Gitlab::GitalyClient).to receive(:can_use_disk?).and_return(enable_rugged)
     else
       unstub_all_feature_flags
@@ -279,24 +280,18 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
     # context 'some test in mocked dir', :do_not_mock_admin_mode do ... end
     admin_mode_mock_dirs = %w(
       ./ee/spec/elastic_integration
-      ./ee/spec/features
       ./ee/spec/finders
       ./ee/spec/lib
       ./ee/spec/requests/admin
       ./ee/spec/serializers
-      ./ee/spec/support/protected_tags
-      ./ee/spec/support/shared_examples/features
       ./ee/spec/support/shared_examples/finders/geo
       ./ee/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/geo
-      ./spec/features
       ./spec/finders
       ./spec/frontend
       ./spec/helpers
       ./spec/lib
       ./spec/requests
       ./spec/serializers
-      ./spec/support/protected_tags
-      ./spec/support/shared_examples/features
       ./spec/support/shared_examples/requests
       ./spec/support/shared_examples/lib/gitlab
       ./spec/views
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/file_read_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/file_read_helpers.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c30a9e6466f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/file_read_helpers.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+module FileReadHelpers
+  def stub_file_read(file, content: nil, error: nil)
+    allow_original_file_read
+
+    expectation = allow(File).to receive(:read).with(file)
+
+    if error
+      expectation.and_raise(error)
+    elsif content
+      expectation.and_return(content)
+    else
+      expectation
+    end
+  end
+
+  def expect_file_read(file, content: nil, error: nil)
+    allow_original_file_read
+
+    expectation = expect(File).to receive(:read).with(file)
+
+    if error
+      expectation.and_raise(error)
+    elsif content
+      expectation.and_return(content)
+    else
+      expectation
+    end
+  end
+
+  def expect_file_not_to_read(file)
+    allow_original_file_read
+
+    expect(File).not_to receive(:read).with(file)
+  end
+
+  private
+
+  def allow_original_file_read
+    # Don't set this mock twice, otherwise subsequent calls will clobber
+    # previous mocks
+    return if @allow_original_file_read
+
+    @allow_original_file_read = true
+    allow(File).to receive(:read).and_call_original
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/graphql_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/graphql_helpers.rb
index a1b4e6eee92..9b6505cc649 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/graphql_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/graphql_helpers.rb
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ module GraphqlHelpers
                     schema: GitlabSchema,
                     query: GraphQL::Query.new(GitlabSchema),
                     parent: nil)
-    field = described_class.fields[name]
+    field = described_class.fields[::GraphqlHelpers.fieldnamerize(name)]
     instance = described_class.authorized_new(object, context)
     field.resolve_field(instance, {}, context)
   end
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/multipart_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/multipart_helpers.rb
index 2e8db0e9e42..bcb184f84c5 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/multipart_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/multipart_helpers.rb
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ module MultipartHelpers
     # *without* the "#{key}." prefix
     result.deep_transform_keys! { |k| k.remove("#{key}.") }
     {
-      "#{key}.gitlab-workhorse-upload" => jwt_token('upload' => result)
+      "#{key}.gitlab-workhorse-upload" => jwt_token(data: { 'upload' => result })
     }
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/stub_object_storage.rb b/spec/support/helpers/stub_object_storage.rb
index dba3d2b137e..dc54a21d0fa 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/stub_object_storage.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/stub_object_storage.rb
@@ -22,6 +22,16 @@ module StubObjectStorage
         background_upload: false,
         direct_upload: false
   )
+    new_config = config.to_h.deep_symbolize_keys.merge({
+      enabled: enabled,
+      proxy_download: proxy_download,
+      background_upload: background_upload,
+      direct_upload: direct_upload
+    })
+
+    # Needed for ObjectStorage::Config compatibility
+    allow(config).to receive(:to_hash).and_return(new_config)
+    allow(config).to receive(:to_h).and_return(new_config)
     allow(config).to receive(:enabled) { enabled }
     allow(config).to receive(:proxy_download) { proxy_download }
     allow(config).to receive(:background_upload) { background_upload }
@@ -84,13 +94,6 @@ module StubObjectStorage
 
   def stub_terraform_state_object_storage(**params)
     stub_object_storage_uploader(config: Gitlab.config.terraform_state.object_store,
-                                 uploader: Terraform::VersionedStateUploader,
-                                 remote_directory: 'terraform',
-                                 **params)
-  end
-
-  def stub_terraform_state_version_object_storage(**params)
-    stub_object_storage_uploader(config: Gitlab.config.terraform_state.object_store,
                                  uploader: Terraform::StateUploader,
                                  remote_directory: 'terraform',
                                  **params)
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/workhorse_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/workhorse_helpers.rb
index 7e95f49aea2..cd8387de686 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/workhorse_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/workhorse_helpers.rb
@@ -85,15 +85,15 @@ module WorkhorseHelpers
 
     return {} if upload_params.empty?
 
-    { "#{key}.gitlab-workhorse-upload" => jwt_token('upload' => upload_params) }
+    { "#{key}.gitlab-workhorse-upload" => jwt_token(data: { 'upload' => upload_params }) }
   end
 
-  def jwt_token(data = {}, issuer: 'gitlab-workhorse', secret: Gitlab::Workhorse.secret, algorithm: 'HS256')
+  def jwt_token(data: {}, issuer: 'gitlab-workhorse', secret: Gitlab::Workhorse.secret, algorithm: 'HS256')
     JWT.encode({ 'iss' => issuer }.merge(data), secret, algorithm)
   end
 
   def workhorse_rewritten_fields_header(fields)
-    { Gitlab::Middleware::Multipart::RACK_ENV_KEY => jwt_token('rewritten_fields' => fields) }
+    { Gitlab::Middleware::Multipart::RACK_ENV_KEY => jwt_token(data: { 'rewritten_fields' => fields }) }
   end
 
   def workhorse_disk_accelerated_file_params(key, file)
diff --git a/spec/support/matchers/access_matchers.rb b/spec/support/matchers/access_matchers.rb
index c9ff777f604..cf97e66fcba 100644
--- a/spec/support/matchers/access_matchers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/matchers/access_matchers.rb
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ module AccessMatchers
       emulate_user(user, @membership)
       visit(url)
 
-      status_code == 200 && current_path != new_user_session_path
+      status_code == 200 && !current_path.in?([new_user_session_path, new_admin_session_path])
     end
 
     chain :of do |membership|
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ module AccessMatchers
       emulate_user(user, @membership)
       visit(url)
 
-      [401, 404].include?(status_code) || current_path == new_user_session_path
+      [401, 404].include?(status_code) || current_path.in?([new_user_session_path, new_admin_session_path])
     end
 
     chain :of do |membership|
diff --git a/spec/support/services/issuable_import_csv_service_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/services/issuable_import_csv_service_shared_examples.rb
index 20ac2ff5c7c..f68750bec32 100644
--- a/spec/support/services/issuable_import_csv_service_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/services/issuable_import_csv_service_shared_examples.rb
@@ -26,29 +26,33 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'issuable import csv service' do |issuable_type|
     end
   end
 
+  shared_examples_for 'invalid file' do
+    it 'returns invalid file error' do
+      expect(subject[:success]).to eq(0)
+      expect(subject[:parse_error]).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'importer with email notification'
+    it_behaves_like 'an issuable importer'
+  end
+
   describe '#execute' do
-    context 'invalid file' do
+    context 'invalid file extension' do
       let(:file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/banana_sample.gif') }
 
-      it 'returns invalid file error' do
-        expect(subject[:success]).to eq(0)
-        expect(subject[:parse_error]).to eq(true)
-      end
+      it_behaves_like 'invalid file'
+    end
 
-      it_behaves_like 'importer with email notification'
-      it_behaves_like 'an issuable importer'
+    context 'empty file' do
+      let(:file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/csv_empty.csv') }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'invalid file'
     end
 
     context 'file without headers' do
       let(:file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/csv_no_headers.csv') }
 
-      it 'returns invalid file error' do
-        expect(subject[:success]).to eq(0)
-        expect(subject[:parse_error]).to eq(true)
-      end
-
-      it_behaves_like 'importer with email notification'
-      it_behaves_like 'an issuable importer'
+      it_behaves_like 'invalid file'
     end
 
     context 'with a file generated by Gitlab CSV export' do
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_contexts/finders/merge_requests_finder_shared_contexts.rb b/spec/support/shared_contexts/finders/merge_requests_finder_shared_contexts.rb
index 88c31bf9cfd..4c003dff947 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_contexts/finders/merge_requests_finder_shared_contexts.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_contexts/finders/merge_requests_finder_shared_contexts.rb
@@ -54,19 +54,19 @@ RSpec.shared_context 'MergeRequestsFinder multiple projects with merge requests
   let!(:label2) { create(:label, project: project1) }
 
   let!(:merge_request1) do
-    create(:merge_request, assignees: [user], author: user,
+    create(:merge_request, assignees: [user], author: user, reviewers: [user2],
            source_project: project2, target_project: project1,
            target_branch: 'merged-target')
   end
 
   let!(:merge_request2) do
-    create(:merge_request, :conflict, assignees: [user], author: user,
+    create(:merge_request, :conflict, assignees: [user], author: user, reviewers: [user2],
            source_project: project2, target_project: project1,
            state: 'closed')
   end
 
   let!(:merge_request3) do
-    create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, assignees: [user2],
+    create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, assignees: [user2], reviewers: [user],
            source_project: project2, target_project: project2,
            state: 'locked',
            title: 'thing WIP thing')
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/controllers/wiki_actions_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/controllers/wiki_actions_shared_examples.rb
index a6ad8fc594c..4c8a45d3b90 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/controllers/wiki_actions_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/controllers/wiki_actions_shared_examples.rb
@@ -14,6 +14,22 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
     sign_in(user)
   end
 
+  shared_examples 'recovers from git timeout' do
+    let(:method_name) { :page }
+
+    context 'when we encounter git command errors' do
+      it 'renders the appropriate template', :aggregate_failures do
+        expect(controller).to receive(method_name) do
+          raise ::Gitlab::Git::CommandTimedOut, 'Deadline Exceeded'
+        end
+
+        request
+
+        expect(response).to render_template('shared/wikis/git_error')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'GET #new' do
     subject(:request) { get :new, params: routing_params }
 
@@ -48,6 +64,12 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
       get :pages, params: routing_params.merge(id: wiki_title)
     end
 
+    it_behaves_like 'recovers from git timeout' do
+      subject(:request) { get :pages, params: routing_params.merge(id: wiki_title) }
+
+      let(:method_name) { :wiki_pages }
+    end
+
     it 'assigns the page collections' do
       expect(assigns(:wiki_pages)).to contain_exactly(an_instance_of(WikiPage))
       expect(assigns(:wiki_entries)).to contain_exactly(an_instance_of(WikiPage))
@@ -99,6 +121,12 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
       end
     end
 
+    it_behaves_like 'recovers from git timeout' do
+      subject(:request) { get :history, params: routing_params.merge(id: wiki_title) }
+
+      let(:allow_read_wiki)   { true }
+    end
+
     it_behaves_like 'fetching history', :ok do
       let(:allow_read_wiki)   { true }
 
@@ -139,6 +167,10 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:not_found)
       end
     end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'recovers from git timeout' do
+      subject(:request) { get :diff, params: routing_params.merge(id: wiki_title, version_id: wiki.repository.commit.id) }
+    end
   end
 
   describe 'GET #show' do
@@ -151,6 +183,8 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
     context 'when page exists' do
       let(:id) { wiki_title }
 
+      it_behaves_like 'recovers from git timeout'
+
       it 'renders the page' do
         request
 
@@ -161,6 +195,28 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
         expect(assigns(:sidebar_limited)).to be(false)
       end
 
+      context 'the sidebar fails to load' do
+        before do
+          allow(Wiki).to receive(:for_container).and_return(wiki)
+          wiki.wiki
+          expect(wiki).to receive(:find_sidebar) do
+            raise ::Gitlab::Git::CommandTimedOut, 'Deadline Exceeded'
+          end
+        end
+
+        it 'renders the page, and marks the sidebar as failed' do
+          request
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to render_template('shared/wikis/_sidebar')
+          expect(assigns(:page).title).to eq(wiki_title)
+          expect(assigns(:sidebar_page)).to be_nil
+          expect(assigns(:sidebar_wiki_entries)).to be_nil
+          expect(assigns(:sidebar_limited)).to be_nil
+          expect(assigns(:sidebar_error)).to be_a_kind_of(::Gitlab::Git::CommandError)
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'page view tracking' do
         it_behaves_like 'tracking unique hll events', :track_unique_wiki_page_views do
           let(:target_id) { 'wiki_action' }
@@ -308,6 +364,7 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'wiki controller actions' do
     subject(:request) { get(:edit, params: routing_params.merge(id: id_param)) }
 
     it_behaves_like 'edit action'
+    it_behaves_like 'recovers from git timeout'
 
     context 'when page content encoding is valid' do
       render_views
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/features/wiki/user_git_access_wiki_page_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/features/wiki/user_git_access_wiki_page_shared_examples.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d3d2a36147d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/features/wiki/user_git_access_wiki_page_shared_examples.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+RSpec.shared_examples 'User views Git access wiki page' do
+  let(:wiki_page) { create(:wiki_page, wiki: wiki) }
+
+  before do
+    sign_in(user)
+  end
+
+  it 'shows the correct clone URLs', :js do
+    visit wiki_page_path(wiki, wiki_page)
+    click_link 'Clone repository'
+
+    expect(page).to have_text("Clone repository #{wiki.full_path}")
+
+    within('.git-clone-holder') do
+      expect(page).to have_css('#clone-dropdown', text: 'HTTP')
+      expect(page).to have_field('clone_url', with: wiki.http_url_to_repo)
+
+      click_link 'HTTP' # open the dropdown
+      click_link 'SSH'  # select the dropdown item
+
+      expect(page).to have_css('#clone-dropdown', text: 'SSH')
+      expect(page).to have_field('clone_url', with: wiki.ssh_url_to_repo)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/connection_redaction_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/connection_redaction_shared_examples.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..12a7b3fe414
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/connection_redaction_shared_examples.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+# requires:
+#  - `connection` (no-empty, containing `unwanted` and at least one more item)
+#  - `unwanted` (single item in collection)
+RSpec.shared_examples 'a redactable connection' do
+  context 'no redactor set' do
+    it 'contains the unwanted item' do
+      expect(connection.nodes).to include(unwanted)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not redact more than once' do
+      connection.nodes
+      r_state = connection.send(:redaction_state)
+
+      expect(r_state.redacted { raise 'Should not be called!' }).to be_present
+    end
+  end
+
+  let_it_be(:constant_redactor) do
+    Class.new do
+      def initialize(remove)
+        @remove = remove
+      end
+
+      def redact(items)
+        items - @remove
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'redactor is set' do
+    let(:redactor) do
+      constant_redactor.new([unwanted])
+    end
+
+    before do
+      connection.redactor = redactor
+    end
+
+    it 'does not contain the unwanted item' do
+      expect(connection.nodes).not_to include(unwanted)
+      expect(connection.nodes).not_to be_empty
+    end
+
+    it 'does not redact more than once' do
+      expect(redactor).to receive(:redact).once.and_call_original
+
+      connection.nodes
+      connection.nodes
+      connection.nodes
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/connection_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/connection_shared_examples.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4cba5b5a69d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/graphql/connection_shared_examples.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+RSpec.shared_examples 'a connection with collection methods' do
+  %i[to_a size include? empty?].each do |method_name|
+    it "responds to #{method_name}" do
+      expect(connection).to respond_to(method_name)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/lib/gitlab/import_export/import_failure_service_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/lib/gitlab/import_export/import_failure_service_shared_examples.rb
index 801be5ae946..67afd2035c4 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/lib/gitlab/import_export/import_failure_service_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/lib/gitlab/import_export/import_failure_service_shared_examples.rb
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
 RSpec.shared_examples 'log import failure' do |importable_column|
   it 'tracks error' do
     extra = {
-              source: action,
-              relation_key: relation_key,
-              relation_index: relation_index,
-              retry_count: retry_count
+      source: action,
+      relation_name: relation_key,
+      relation_index: relation_index,
+      retry_count: retry_count
     }
     extra[importable_column] = importable.id
 
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/graphql_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/graphql_shared_examples.rb
index 0045fe14501..a66bc7112fe 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/graphql_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/graphql_shared_examples.rb
@@ -9,3 +9,8 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'a working graphql query' do
     expect(json_response.keys).to include('data')
   end
 end
+
+RSpec.shared_examples 'a mutation on an unauthorized resource' do
+  it_behaves_like 'a mutation that returns top-level errors',
+                      errors: [::Gitlab::Graphql::Authorize::AuthorizeResource::RESOURCE_ACCESS_ERROR]
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/rack_attack_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/rack_attack_shared_examples.rb
index d4ee68309ff..323ac50808d 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/rack_attack_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/requests/rack_attack_shared_examples.rb
@@ -110,6 +110,14 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'rate-limited token-authenticated requests' do
         expect { make_request(request_args) }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count)
       end
     end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'tracking when dry-run mode is set' do
+      let(:throttle_name) { throttle_types[throttle_setting_prefix] }
+
+      def do_request
+        make_request(request_args)
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   context 'when the throttle is disabled' do
@@ -245,6 +253,14 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'rate-limited web authenticated requests' do
       expect(Gitlab::AuthLogger).to receive(:error).with(arguments).once
       expect { request_authenticated_web_url }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count)
     end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'tracking when dry-run mode is set' do
+      let(:throttle_name) { throttle_types[throttle_setting_prefix] }
+
+      def do_request
+        request_authenticated_web_url
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   context 'when the throttle is disabled' do
@@ -269,3 +285,63 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'rate-limited web authenticated requests' do
     end
   end
 end
+
+# Requires:
+# - #do_request - This needs to be a method so the result isn't memoized
+# - throttle_name
+RSpec.shared_examples 'tracking when dry-run mode is set' do
+  let(:dry_run_config) { '*' }
+
+  # we can't use `around` here, because stub_env isn't supported outside of the
+  # example itself
+  before do
+    stub_env('GITLAB_THROTTLE_DRY_RUN', dry_run_config)
+    reset_rack_attack
+  end
+
+  after do
+    stub_env('GITLAB_THROTTLE_DRY_RUN', '')
+    reset_rack_attack
+  end
+
+  def reset_rack_attack
+    Rack::Attack.reset!
+    Rack::Attack.clear_configuration
+    Gitlab::RackAttack.configure(Rack::Attack)
+  end
+
+  it 'does not throttle the requests when `*` is configured' do
+    (1 + requests_per_period).times do
+      do_request
+      expect(response).not_to have_gitlab_http_status(:too_many_requests)
+    end
+  end
+
+  it 'logs RackAttack info into structured logs' do
+    arguments = a_hash_including({
+      message: 'Rack_Attack',
+      env: :track,
+      remote_ip: '127.0.0.1',
+      matched: throttle_name
+    })
+
+    expect(Gitlab::AuthLogger).to receive(:error).with(arguments)
+
+    (1 + requests_per_period).times do
+      do_request
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when configured with the the throttled name in a list' do
+    let(:dry_run_config) do
+      "throttle_list, #{throttle_name}, other_throttle"
+    end
+
+    it 'does not throttle' do
+      (1 + requests_per_period).times do
+        do_request
+        expect(response).not_to have_gitlab_http_status(:too_many_requests)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/services/metrics/dashboard_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/services/metrics/dashboard_shared_examples.rb
index 1501a2a0f52..b6c33eac7b4 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/services/metrics/dashboard_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/services/metrics/dashboard_shared_examples.rb
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'refreshes cache when dashboard_version is changed' do
       allow(service).to receive(:dashboard_version).and_return('1', '2')
     end
 
-    expect(File).to receive(:read).twice.and_call_original
+    expect_file_read(Rails.root.join(described_class::DASHBOARD_PATH)).twice.and_call_original
 
     service = described_class.new(*service_params)
 
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/workers/project_export_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/workers/project_export_shared_examples.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9bcc3f4f7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/workers/project_export_shared_examples.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+RSpec.shared_examples 'export worker' do
+  describe '#perform' do
+    let!(:user) { create(:user) }
+    let!(:project) { create(:project) }
+
+    before do
+      allow_next_instance_of(described_class) do |job|
+        allow(job).to receive(:jid).and_return(SecureRandom.hex(8))
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when it succeeds' do
+      it 'calls the ExportService' do
+        expect_next_instance_of(::Projects::ImportExport::ExportService) do |service|
+          expect(service).to receive(:execute)
+        end
+
+        subject.perform(user.id, project.id, { 'klass' => 'Gitlab::ImportExport::AfterExportStrategies::DownloadNotificationStrategy' })
+      end
+
+      context 'export job' do
+        before do
+          allow_next_instance_of(::Projects::ImportExport::ExportService) do |service|
+            allow(service).to receive(:execute)
+          end
+        end
+
+        it 'creates an export job record for the project' do
+          expect { subject.perform(user.id, project.id, {}) }.to change { project.export_jobs.count }.from(0).to(1)
+        end
+
+        it 'sets the export job status to started' do
+          expect_next_instance_of(ProjectExportJob) do |job|
+            expect(job).to receive(:start)
+          end
+
+          subject.perform(user.id, project.id, {})
+        end
+
+        it 'sets the export job status to finished' do
+          expect_next_instance_of(ProjectExportJob) do |job|
+            expect(job).to receive(:finish)
+          end
+
+          subject.perform(user.id, project.id, {})
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when it fails' do
+      it 'does not raise an exception when strategy is invalid' do
+        expect(::Projects::ImportExport::ExportService).not_to receive(:new)
+
+        expect { subject.perform(user.id, project.id, { 'klass' => 'Whatever' }) }.not_to raise_error
+      end
+
+      it 'does not raise error when project cannot be found' do
+        expect { subject.perform(user.id, non_existing_record_id, {}) }.not_to raise_error
+      end
+
+      it 'does not raise error when user cannot be found' do
+        expect { subject.perform(non_existing_record_id, project.id, {}) }.not_to raise_error
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'sidekiq options' do
+    it 'disables retry' do
+      expect(described_class.sidekiq_options['retry']).to eq(false)
+    end
+
+    it 'disables dead' do
+      expect(described_class.sidekiq_options['dead']).to eq(false)
+    end
+
+    it 'sets default status expiration' do
+      expect(described_class.sidekiq_options['status_expiration']).to eq(StuckExportJobsWorker::EXPORT_JOBS_EXPIRATION)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/snowplow.rb b/spec/support/snowplow.rb
index b67fa96fab8..9635b1bd656 100644
--- a/spec/support/snowplow.rb
+++ b/spec/support/snowplow.rb
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
     # WebMock is set up to allow requests to `localhost`
     host = 'localhost'
 
+    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::ProductAnalytics).to receive(:event)
+
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Tracking::Destinations::Snowplow)
       .to receive(:emitter)
       .and_return(SnowplowTracker::Emitter.new(host, buffer_size: buffer_size))
diff --git a/spec/tasks/gettext_rake_spec.rb b/spec/tasks/gettext_rake_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a535ac92a75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/tasks/gettext_rake_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require "rake_helper"
+
+RSpec.describe 'gettext' do
+  let(:locale_path) { Rails.root.join('tmp/gettext_spec') }
+  let(:pot_file_path) { File.join(locale_path, 'gitlab.pot') }
+
+  before do
+    Rake.application.rake_require('tasks/gettext')
+
+    FileUtils.rm_r(locale_path) if Dir.exist?(locale_path)
+    FileUtils.mkdir_p(locale_path)
+
+    allow(Rails.root).to receive(:join).and_call_original
+    allow(Rails.root).to receive(:join).with('locale').and_return(locale_path)
+  end
+
+  after do
+    FileUtils.rm_r(locale_path) if Dir.exist?(locale_path)
+  end
+
+  describe ':compile' do
+    before do
+      allow(Rake::Task).to receive(:[]).and_call_original
+    end
+
+    it 'creates a pot file and invokes the \'gettext:po_to_json\' task' do
+      expect(Rake::Task).to receive(:[]).with('gettext:po_to_json').and_return(double(invoke: true))
+
+      expect { run_rake_task('gettext:compile') }
+        .to change { File.exist?(pot_file_path) }
+        .to be_truthy
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe ':regenerate' do
+    before do
+      # this task takes a *really* long time to complete, so stub it for the spec
+      allow(Rake::Task['gettext:find']).to receive(:invoke) { invoke_find.call }
+    end
+
+    context 'when the locale folder is not found' do
+      let(:invoke_find) { -> { true } }
+
+      before do
+        FileUtils.rm_r(locale_path) if Dir.exist?(locale_path)
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:regenerate') }
+          .to raise_error(/Cannot find '#{locale_path}' folder/)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'where there are existing /**/gitlab.po files' do
+      let(:locale_nz_path) { File.join(locale_path, 'en_NZ') }
+      let(:po_file_path) { File.join(locale_nz_path, 'gitlab.po') }
+
+      let(:invoke_find) { -> { File.write pot_file_path, 'pot file test updates' } }
+
+      before do
+        FileUtils.mkdir(locale_nz_path)
+        File.write(po_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po'))
+      end
+
+      it 'does not remove that locale' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:regenerate') }
+          .not_to change { Dir.exist?(locale_nz_path) }
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when there are locale folders without a gitlab.po file' do
+      let(:empty_locale_path) { File.join(locale_path, 'en_NZ') }
+
+      let(:invoke_find) { -> { File.write pot_file_path, 'pot file test updates' } }
+
+      before do
+        FileUtils.mkdir(empty_locale_path)
+      end
+
+      it 'removes those folders' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:regenerate') }
+          .to change { Dir.exist?(empty_locale_path) }
+          .to eq false
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when the gitlab.pot file cannot be generated' do
+      let(:invoke_find) { -> { true } }
+
+      it 'prints an error' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:regenerate') }
+          .to raise_error(/gitlab.pot file not generated/)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when gettext:find changes the revision dates' do
+      let(:invoke_find) { -> { File.write pot_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po') } }
+
+      before do
+        File.write pot_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po')
+      end
+
+      it 'resets the changes' do
+        pot_file = File.read(pot_file_path)
+        expect(pot_file).to include('PO-Revision-Date: 2017-07-13 12:10-0500')
+        expect(pot_file).to include('PO-Creation-Date: 2016-07-13 12:11-0500')
+
+        run_rake_task('gettext:regenerate')
+
+        pot_file = File.read(pot_file_path)
+        expect(pot_file).not_to include('PO-Revision-Date: 2017-07-13 12:10-0500')
+        expect(pot_file).not_to include('PO-Creation-Date: 2016-07-13 12:11-0500')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe ':lint' do
+    before do
+      # make sure we test on the fixture files, not the actual gitlab repo as
+      # this takes a long time
+      allow(Rails.root)
+        .to receive(:join)
+        .with('locale/*/gitlab.po')
+        .and_return(File.join(locale_path, '*/gitlab.po'))
+    end
+
+    context 'when all PO files are valid' do
+      before do
+        nz_locale_path = File.join(locale_path, 'en_NZ')
+        FileUtils.mkdir(nz_locale_path)
+
+        po_file_path = File.join(nz_locale_path, 'gitlab.po')
+        File.write(po_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po'))
+        File.write(pot_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po'))
+      end
+
+      it 'completes without error' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:lint') }
+          .not_to raise_error
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when there are invalid PO files' do
+      before do
+        nz_locale_path = File.join(locale_path, 'en_NZ')
+        FileUtils.mkdir(nz_locale_path)
+
+        po_file_path = File.join(nz_locale_path, 'gitlab.po')
+        File.write(po_file_path, fixture_file('invalid.po'))
+        File.write(pot_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po'))
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:lint') }
+          .to raise_error(/Not all PO-files are valid/)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when the .pot file is invalid' do
+      before do
+        nz_locale_path = File.join(locale_path, 'en_NZ')
+        FileUtils.mkdir(nz_locale_path)
+
+        po_file_path = File.join(nz_locale_path, 'gitlab.po')
+        File.write(po_file_path, fixture_file('valid.po'))
+        File.write(pot_file_path, fixture_file('invalid.po'))
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { run_rake_task('gettext:lint') }
+          .to raise_error(/Not all PO-files are valid/)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb b/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb
index 046e066a45f..313088599e9 100644
--- a/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'gitlab:db namespace rake task' do
     let(:output) { StringIO.new }
 
     before do
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with(structure_file).and_return(input)
+      stub_file_read(structure_file, content: input)
       allow(File).to receive(:open).with(structure_file, any_args).and_yield(output)
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/tooling/lib/tooling/test_map_generator_spec.rb b/spec/tooling/lib/tooling/test_map_generator_spec.rb
index 7f3b2807162..4c720ba62a2 100644
--- a/spec/tooling/lib/tooling/test_map_generator_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/tooling/lib/tooling/test_map_generator_spec.rb
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
 # frozen_string_literal: true
 
 require_relative '../../../../tooling/lib/tooling/test_map_generator'
+require_relative '../../../support/helpers/file_read_helpers'
 
 RSpec.describe Tooling::TestMapGenerator do
+  include FileReadHelpers
+
   subject { described_class.new }
 
   describe '#parse' do
@@ -39,8 +42,8 @@ RSpec.describe Tooling::TestMapGenerator do
     let(:pathname) { instance_double(Pathname) }
 
     before do
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with('yaml1.yml').and_return(yaml1)
-      allow(File).to receive(:read).with('yaml2.yml').and_return(yaml2)
+      stub_file_read('yaml1.yml', content: yaml1)
+      stub_file_read('yaml2.yml', content: yaml2)
     end
 
     context 'with single yaml' do
diff --git a/spec/uploaders/terraform/state_uploader_spec.rb b/spec/uploaders/terraform/state_uploader_spec.rb
index dadfdf6e93f..bd8e7fbc016 100644
--- a/spec/uploaders/terraform/state_uploader_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/uploaders/terraform/state_uploader_spec.rb
@@ -3,23 +3,45 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe Terraform::StateUploader do
-  subject { terraform_state.file }
+  subject { state_version.file }
 
-  let(:terraform_state) { create(:terraform_state, :with_file) }
+  let(:state_version) { create(:terraform_state_version) }
 
   before do
     stub_terraform_state_object_storage
   end
 
   describe '#filename' do
-    it 'contains the UUID of the terraform state record' do
-      expect(subject.filename).to include(terraform_state.uuid)
+    it 'contains the version of the terraform state record' do
+      expect(subject.filename).to eq("#{state_version.version}.tfstate")
+    end
+
+    context 'legacy state with versioning disabled' do
+      let(:state) { create(:terraform_state, versioning_enabled: false) }
+      let(:state_version) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: state) }
+
+      it 'contains the UUID of the terraform state record' do
+        expect(subject.filename).to eq("#{state_version.uuid}.tfstate")
+      end
     end
   end
 
   describe '#store_dir' do
-    it 'contains the ID of the project' do
-      expect(subject.store_dir).to include(terraform_state.project_id.to_s)
+    it 'hashes the project ID and UUID' do
+      expect(Gitlab::HashedPath).to receive(:new)
+        .with(state_version.uuid, root_hash: state_version.project_id)
+        .and_return(:store_dir)
+
+      expect(subject.store_dir).to eq(:store_dir)
+    end
+
+    context 'legacy state with versioning disabled' do
+      let(:state) { create(:terraform_state, versioning_enabled: false) }
+      let(:state_version) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: state) }
+
+      it 'contains the ID of the project' do
+        expect(subject.store_dir).to include(state_version.project_id.to_s)
+      end
     end
   end
 
@@ -27,7 +49,7 @@ RSpec.describe Terraform::StateUploader do
     it 'creates a digest with a secret key and the project id' do
       expect(OpenSSL::HMAC)
         .to receive(:digest)
-        .with('SHA256', Gitlab::Application.secrets.db_key_base, terraform_state.project_id.to_s)
+        .with('SHA256', Gitlab::Application.secrets.db_key_base, state_version.project_id.to_s)
         .and_return('digest')
 
       expect(subject.key).to eq('digest')
diff --git a/spec/uploaders/terraform/versioned_state_uploader_spec.rb b/spec/uploaders/terraform/versioned_state_uploader_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index eeb54cb61c7..00000000000
--- a/spec/uploaders/terraform/versioned_state_uploader_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-RSpec.describe Terraform::VersionedStateUploader do
-  subject { model.file }
-
-  let(:model) { create(:terraform_state_version, :with_file) }
-
-  before do
-    stub_terraform_state_object_storage
-  end
-
-  describe '#filename' do
-    it 'contains the version of the terraform state record' do
-      expect(subject.filename).to eq("#{model.version}.tfstate")
-    end
-
-    context 'legacy state with versioning disabled' do
-      let(:state) { create(:legacy_terraform_state) }
-      let(:model) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: state) }
-
-      it 'contains the UUID of the terraform state record' do
-        expect(subject.filename).to eq("#{model.uuid}.tfstate")
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#store_dir' do
-    it 'hashes the project ID and UUID' do
-      expect(Gitlab::HashedPath).to receive(:new)
-        .with(model.uuid, root_hash: model.project_id)
-        .and_return(:store_dir)
-
-      expect(subject.store_dir).to eq(:store_dir)
-    end
-
-    context 'legacy state with versioning disabled' do
-      let(:state) { create(:legacy_terraform_state) }
-      let(:model) { create(:terraform_state_version, terraform_state: state) }
-
-      it 'contains the ID of the project' do
-        expect(subject.store_dir).to include(model.project_id.to_s)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml_spec.rb
index e9223c84674..5494b908705 100644
--- a/spec/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin/dashboard/index.html.haml' do
 
     allow(view).to receive(:admin?).and_return(true)
     allow(view).to receive(:current_application_settings).and_return(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.current_application_settings)
-    allow(view).to receive(:show_license_breakdown?).and_return(false)
   end
 
   it "shows version of GitLab Workhorse" do
diff --git a/spec/views/shared/wikis/_sidebar.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/shared/wikis/_sidebar.html.haml_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ddf223efd99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/views/shared/wikis/_sidebar.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe 'shared/wikis/_sidebar.html.haml' do
+  let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
+  let_it_be(:wiki) { Wiki.for_container(project, project.default_owner) }
+
+  before do
+    assign(:wiki, wiki)
+    assign(:project, project)
+  end
+
+  it 'includes a link to clone the repository' do
+    render
+
+    expect(rendered).to have_link('Clone repository')
+  end
+
+  context 'the wiki is not a project wiki' do
+    it 'does not include the clone repository link' do
+      allow(wiki).to receive(:container).and_return(create(:group))
+
+      render
+
+      expect(rendered).not_to have_link('Clone repository')
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'the sidebar failed to load' do
+    before do
+      assign(:sidebar_error, Object.new)
+    end
+
+    it 'reports this to the user' do
+      render
+
+      expect(rendered).to include('The sidebar failed to load')
+      expect(rendered).to have_css('.gl-alert.gl-alert-info')
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'The sidebar comes from a custom page' do
+    before do
+      assign(:sidebar_page, double('WikiPage', path: 'sidebar.md', slug: 'sidebar', content: 'Some sidebar content'))
+    end
+
+    it 'does not show an alert' do
+      render
+
+      expect(rendered).not_to include('The sidebar failed to load')
+      expect(rendered).not_to have_css('.gl-alert.gl-alert-info')
+    end
+
+    it 'renders the wiki content' do
+      render
+
+      expect(rendered).to include('Some sidebar content')
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'The sidebar comes a list of wiki pages' do
+    before do
+      assign(:sidebar_wiki_entries, create_list(:wiki_page, 3, wiki: wiki))
+      assign(:sidebar_limited, true)
+      stub_template "../shared/wikis/_wiki_pages.html.erb" => "Entries: <%= @sidebar_wiki_entries.size %>"
+      stub_template "../shared/wikis/_wiki_page.html.erb" => 'A WIKI PAGE'
+    end
+
+    it 'does not show an alert' do
+      render
+
+      expect(rendered).not_to include('The sidebar failed to load')
+      expect(rendered).not_to have_css('.gl-alert.gl-alert-info')
+    end
+
+    it 'renders the wiki content' do
+      render
+
+      expect(rendered).to include('A WIKI PAGE' * 3)
+      expect(rendered).to have_link('View All Pages')
+    end
+
+    context 'there is no more to see' do
+      it 'does not invite the user to view more' do
+        assign(:sidebar_limited, false)
+
+        render
+
+        expect(rendered).not_to have_link('View All Pages')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/workers/project_export_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/project_export_worker_spec.rb
index defecefc3cc..9923d8bde7f 100644
--- a/spec/workers/project_export_worker_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/workers/project_export_worker_spec.rb
@@ -3,84 +3,5 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe ProjectExportWorker do
-  let!(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let!(:project) { create(:project) }
-
-  subject { described_class.new }
-
-  describe '#perform' do
-    before do
-      allow_next_instance_of(described_class) do |job|
-        allow(job).to receive(:jid).and_return(SecureRandom.hex(8))
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when it succeeds' do
-      it 'calls the ExportService' do
-        expect_next_instance_of(::Projects::ImportExport::ExportService) do |service|
-          expect(service).to receive(:execute)
-        end
-
-        subject.perform(user.id, project.id, { 'klass' => 'Gitlab::ImportExport::AfterExportStrategies::DownloadNotificationStrategy' })
-      end
-
-      context 'export job' do
-        before do
-          allow_next_instance_of(::Projects::ImportExport::ExportService) do |service|
-            allow(service).to receive(:execute)
-          end
-        end
-
-        it 'creates an export job record for the project' do
-          expect { subject.perform(user.id, project.id, {}) }.to change { project.export_jobs.count }.from(0).to(1)
-        end
-
-        it 'sets the export job status to started' do
-          expect_next_instance_of(ProjectExportJob) do |job|
-            expect(job).to receive(:start)
-          end
-
-          subject.perform(user.id, project.id, {})
-        end
-
-        it 'sets the export job status to finished' do
-          expect_next_instance_of(ProjectExportJob) do |job|
-            expect(job).to receive(:finish)
-          end
-
-          subject.perform(user.id, project.id, {})
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when it fails' do
-      it 'does not raise an exception when strategy is invalid' do
-        expect(::Projects::ImportExport::ExportService).not_to receive(:new)
-
-        expect { subject.perform(user.id, project.id, { 'klass' => 'Whatever' }) }.not_to raise_error
-      end
-
-      it 'does not raise error when project cannot be found' do
-        expect { subject.perform(user.id, non_existing_record_id, {}) }.not_to raise_error
-      end
-
-      it 'does not raise error when user cannot be found' do
-        expect { subject.perform(non_existing_record_id, project.id, {}) }.not_to raise_error
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe 'sidekiq options' do
-    it 'disables retry' do
-      expect(described_class.sidekiq_options['retry']).to eq(false)
-    end
-
-    it 'disables dead' do
-      expect(described_class.sidekiq_options['dead']).to eq(false)
-    end
-
-    it 'sets default status expiration' do
-      expect(described_class.sidekiq_options['status_expiration']).to eq(StuckExportJobsWorker::EXPORT_JOBS_EXPIRATION)
-    end
-  end
+  it_behaves_like 'export worker'
 end
diff --git a/spec/workers/create_evidence_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/releases/create_evidence_worker_spec.rb
index c700c086163..743f2abc8a7 100644
--- a/spec/workers/create_evidence_worker_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/workers/releases/create_evidence_worker_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe CreateEvidenceWorker do
+RSpec.describe Releases::CreateEvidenceWorker do
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:release) { create(:release, project: project) }
   let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_empty_pipeline, sha: release.sha, project: project) }
diff --git a/spec/workers/releases/manage_evidence_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/releases/manage_evidence_worker_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2fbfb6c9dc1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/workers/releases/manage_evidence_worker_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Releases::ManageEvidenceWorker do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+
+  shared_examples_for 'does not create a new Evidence record' do
+    specify :sidekiq_inline do
+      aggregate_failures do
+        expect(::Releases::CreateEvidenceService).not_to receive(:execute)
+        expect { described_class.new.perform }.to change(Releases::Evidence, :count).by(0)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when `released_at` in inside the window' do
+    context 'when Evidence has not been created' do
+      let(:release) { create(:release, project: project, released_at: 1.hour.since) }
+
+      it 'creates a new Evidence record', :sidekiq_inline do
+        expect_next_instance_of(::Releases::CreateEvidenceService, release, { pipeline: nil }) do |service|
+          expect(service).to receive(:execute).and_call_original
+        end
+
+        expect { described_class.new.perform }.to change(Releases::Evidence, :count).by(1)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when evidence has already been created' do
+      let(:release) { create(:release, project: project, released_at: 1.hour.since) }
+      let!(:evidence) { create(:evidence, release: release )}
+
+      it_behaves_like 'does not create a new Evidence record'
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when `released_at` is outside the window' do
+    let(:release) { create(:release, project: project, released_at: 300.minutes.since) }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'does not create a new Evidence record'
+  end
+end