summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development/contributing
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/contributing')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/contributing/community_roles.md2
-rw-r--r--doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md131
-rw-r--r--doc/development/contributing/merge_request_workflow.md42
-rw-r--r--doc/development/contributing/style_guides.md1
4 files changed, 67 insertions, 109 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/contributing/community_roles.md b/doc/development/contributing/community_roles.md
index 3296cb173d7..7d2d1b77a0e 100644
--- a/doc/development/contributing/community_roles.md
+++ b/doc/development/contributing/community_roles.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-### Community members & roles
+# Community members & roles
GitLab community members and their privileges/responsibilities.
diff --git a/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md b/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md
index 910f9f4bf7a..b2e3ef7bf63 100644
--- a/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md
+++ b/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md
@@ -58,78 +58,33 @@ issue is labeled with a subject label corresponding to your expertise.
Subject labels are always all-lowercase.
-## Team labels
+## Team labels
-**Important**: Most of the team labels will be soon deprecated in favor of [Group labels](#group-labels).
+**Important**: Most of the historical team labels (e.g. Manage, Plan etc.) are
+now deprecated in favor of [Group labels](#group-labels) and [Stage labels](#stage-labels).
Team labels specify what team is responsible for this issue.
Assigning a team label makes sure issues get the attention of the appropriate
people.
-The team labels planned for deprecation are:
-
-- ~Configure
-- ~Create
-- ~Defend
-- ~Distribution
-- ~Ecosystem
-- ~Geo
-- ~Gitaly
-- ~Growth
-- ~Manage
-- ~Memory
-- ~Monitor
-- ~Plan
-- ~Release
-- ~Secure
-- ~Verify
-
-The following team labels are **true** teams per our [organization structure](https://about.gitlab.com/company/team/structure/#organizational-structure) which will remain post deprecation.
+The current team labels are:
- ~Delivery
- ~Documentation
-
-The descriptions on the [labels page](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/labels) explain what falls under the
-responsibility of each team.
-
-Within those team labels, we also have the ~backend and ~frontend labels to
-indicate if an issue needs backend work, frontend work, or both.
+- ~Quality
Team labels are always capitalized so that they show up as the first label for
any issue.
-
## Stage labels
Stage labels specify which [DevOps stage][devops-stages] the issue belongs to.
-The current stage labels are:
-
-- ~"devops::manage"
-- ~"devops::plan"
-- ~"devops::create"
-- ~"devops::verify"
-- ~"devops::package"
-- ~"devops::release"
-- ~"devops::configure"
-- ~"devops::monitor"
-- ~"devops::secure"
-- ~"devops::defend"
-- ~"devops::growth"
-- ~"devops::enablement"
+The current stage labels can be found by [searching the labels list for `devops::`](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/labels?search=devops%3A%3A).
These labels are [scoped labels](../../user/project/labels.md#scoped-labels-premium)
and thus are mutually exclusive.
-They differ from the [Team labels](#team-labels) because teams may work on
-issues outside their stage.
-
-Normally there is a 1:1 relationship between Stage labels and Team labels, but
-any issue can be picked up by any team, depending on current priorities.
-So, an issue labeled ~"devops:create" may be scheduled by the ~Plan team, for
-example. In such cases, it's usual to include both team labels so each team can
-be aware of the progress.
-
The Stage labels are used to generate the [direction pages][direction-pages] automatically.
[devops-stages]: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/#devops-stages
@@ -139,51 +94,21 @@ The Stage labels are used to generate the [direction pages][direction-pages] aut
Group labels specify which [groups][structure-groups] the issue belongs to.
-The current group labels are:
-
-* ~"group::access"
-* ~"group::measure"
-* ~"group::source code"
-* ~"group::knowledge"
-* ~"group::editor"
-* ~"group::gitaly"
-* ~"group::gitter"
-* ~"group::team planning"
-* ~"group::enterprise planning"
-* ~"group::certify"
-* ~"group::ci and runner"
-* ~"group::testing"
-* ~"group::package"
-* ~"group::progressive delivery"
-* ~"group::release management"
-* ~"group::autodevops and kubernetes"
-* ~"group::serverless and paas"
-* ~"group::apm"
-* ~"group::health"
-* ~"group::static analysis"
-* ~"group::dynamic analysis"
-* ~"group::software composition analysis"
-* ~"group::runtime application security"
-* ~"group::threat management"
-* ~"group::application infrastructure security"
-* ~"group::activation"
-* ~"group::adoption"
-* ~"group::upsell"
-* ~"group::retention"
-* ~"group::fulfillment"
-* ~"group::telemetry"
-* ~"group::distribution"
-* ~"group::geo"
-* ~"group::memory"
-* ~"group::ecosystem"
-
+The current group labels can be found by [searching the labels list for `group::`](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/labels?search=group%3A%3A).
These labels are [scoped labels](../../user/project/labels.md#scoped-labels-premium)
and thus are mutually exclusive.
-Groups are nested beneath a particular stage, so only one stage label and one group label
-can be applied to a single issue. You can find the groups listed in the
-[Product Categories pages][product-categories].
+You can find the groups listed in the [Product Stages, Groups, and Categories][product-categories] page.
+
+We use the term group to map down product requirements from our product stages.
+As a team needs some way to collect the work their members are planning to be assigned to, we use the `~group::` labels to do so.
+
+Normally there is a 1:1 relationship between Stage labels and Group labels. In the spirit of "Everyone can contribute",
+any issue can be picked up by any group, depending on current priorities. For example, an issue labeled ~"devops::create" may be picked up by the ~"group::access" group.
+
+We also use stage and group labels to help quantify our [throughput](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/management/throughput).
+Please read [Stage and Group labels in Throughtput](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/management/throughput/#stage-and-group-labels-in-throughput) for more information on how the labels are used in this context.
[structure-groups]: https://about.gitlab.com/company/team/structure/#groups
[product-categories]: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/
@@ -192,15 +117,15 @@ can be applied to a single issue. You can find the groups listed in the
The current department labels are:
-* ~UX
-* ~Quality
+- ~UX
+- ~Quality
## Specialization labels
These labels narrow the [specialization](https://about.gitlab.com/company/team/structure/#specialist) on a unit of work.
-* ~frontend
-* ~backend
+- ~frontend
+- ~backend
## Release Scoping labels
@@ -248,10 +173,10 @@ There can be multiple facets of the impact. The below is a guideline.
If a bug seems to fall between two severity labels, assign it to the higher-severity label.
- Example(s) of ~S1
- - Data corruption/loss.
+ - Data corruption/loss.
- Security breach.
- - Unable to create an issue or merge request.
- - Unable to add a comment or discussion to the issue or merge request.
+ - Unable to create an issue or merge request.
+ - Unable to add a comment or thread to the issue or merge request.
- Example(s) of ~S2
- Cannot submit changes through the web IDE but the commandline works.
- A status widget on the merge request page is not working but information can be seen in the test pipeline page.
@@ -261,7 +186,7 @@ If a bug seems to fall between two severity labels, assign it to the higher-seve
- Example(s) of ~S4
- Label colors are incorrect.
- UI elements are not fully aligned.
-
+
## Label for community contributors
Issues that are beneficial to our users, 'nice to haves', that we currently do
@@ -296,7 +221,7 @@ know how difficult the issue is. Additionally:
as suitable for people that have never contributed to GitLab before on the
[Up For Grabs campaign](http://up-for-grabs.net)
- We encourage people that have never contributed to any open source project to
- look for [`Accepting merge requests` issues with a weight of 1][firt-timers]
+ look for [`Accepting merge requests` issues with a weight of 1][first-timers]
If you've decided that you would like to work on an issue, please @-mention
the [appropriate product manager](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/#who-to-talk-to-for-what)
@@ -309,8 +234,8 @@ GitLab team members who apply the ~"Accepting merge requests" label to an issue
should update the issue description with a responsible product manager, inviting
any potential community contributor to @-mention per above.
-[up-for-grabs]: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/issues?state=opened&label_name[]=Accepting+merge+requests&assignee_id=0&sort=weight
-[firt-timers]: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/issues?state=opened&label_name[]=Accepting+merge+requests&assignee_id=0&sort=weight&weight=1
+[up-for-grabs]: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/issues?state=opened&label_name[]=Accepting+merge+requests&assignee_id=None&sort=weight
+[first-timers]: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/issues?state=opened&label_name[]=Accepting+merge+requests&assignee_id=None&sort=weight&weight=1
## Issue triaging
diff --git a/doc/development/contributing/merge_request_workflow.md b/doc/development/contributing/merge_request_workflow.md
index 3f61ad7cb13..4e9c5c81379 100644
--- a/doc/development/contributing/merge_request_workflow.md
+++ b/doc/development/contributing/merge_request_workflow.md
@@ -74,10 +74,10 @@ request is as follows:
can be found by running `grep css-class ./app -R`.
1. Be prepared to answer questions and incorporate feedback into your MR with new
commits. Once you have fully addressed a suggestion from a reviewer, click the
- "Resolve discussion" button beneath it to mark it resolved.
- 1. The merge request author resolves only the discussions they have fully addressed.
- If there's an open reply or discussion, a suggestion, a question, or anything else,
- the discussion should be left to be resolved by the reviewer.
+ "Resolve thread" button beneath it to mark it resolved.
+ 1. The merge request author resolves only the threads they have fully addressed.
+ If there's an open reply or thread, a suggestion, a question, or anything else,
+ the thread should be left to be resolved by the reviewer.
1. If your MR touches code that executes shell commands, reads or opens files, or
handles paths to files on disk, make sure it adheres to the
[shell command guidelines](../shell_commands.md)
@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ If you would like quick feedback on your merge request feel free to mention some
from the [core team](https://about.gitlab.com/community/core-team/) or one of the
[merge request coaches](https://about.gitlab.com/team/). When having your code reviewed
and when reviewing merge requests, please keep the [code review guidelines](../code_review.md)
-in mind.
+in mind. And if your code also makes changes to the database, or does expensive queries,
+check the [database review guidelines](../database_review.md).
### Keep it simple
@@ -142,6 +143,37 @@ If the guidelines are not met, the MR will not pass the
[Danger checks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/danger/commit_messages/Dangerfile).
For more information see [How to Write a Git Commit Message](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/).
+Example commit message template that can be used on your machine that embodies the above (guide for [how to apply template](https://codeinthehole.com/tips/a-useful-template-for-commit-messages/)):
+
+```text
+# (If applied, this commit will...) <subject> (Max 50 char)
+# |<---- Using a Maximum Of 50 Characters ---->|
+
+
+# Explain why this change is being made
+# |<---- Try To Limit Each Line to a Maximum Of 72 Characters ---->|
+
+# Provide links or keys to any relevant tickets, articles or other resources
+# Use issues and merge requests' full URLs instead of short references,
+# as they are displayed as plain text outside of GitLab
+
+# --- COMMIT END ---
+# --------------------
+# Remember to
+# Capitalize the subject line
+# Use the imperative mood in the subject line
+# Do not end the subject line with a period
+# Subject must contain at least 3 words
+# Separate subject from body with a blank line
+# Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files must
+# describe these changes in the commit body
+# Do not use Emojis
+# Use the body to explain what and why vs. how
+# Can use multiple lines with "-" for bullet points in body
+# For more information: https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
+# --------------------
+```
+
## Contribution acceptance criteria
To make sure that your merge request can be approved, please ensure that it meets
diff --git a/doc/development/contributing/style_guides.md b/doc/development/contributing/style_guides.md
index 5c6ea1f469d..7832850a9f0 100644
--- a/doc/development/contributing/style_guides.md
+++ b/doc/development/contributing/style_guides.md
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
1. Code should be written in [US English][us-english]
1. [Go](../go_guide/index.md)
1. [Python](../python_guide/index.md)
+1. [Shell scripting](../shell_scripting_guide/index.md)
This is also the style used by linting tools such as
[RuboCop](https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop) and [Hound CI](https://houndci.com).