summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRobert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>2014-08-28 08:53:25 -0700
committerRobert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>2014-08-28 08:53:25 -0700
commit7b6317b4cc6376d7605546f25d17cf0f796c7826 (patch)
tree5cc481148c1aff6628ac75f464e0c4d3462d5140 /doc
parent68ac475b3c32d6a9d8e212d00a8b3d5f319cfa25 (diff)
downloadgo-7b6317b4cc6376d7605546f25d17cf0f796c7826.tar.gz
spec: move Method expr/value section near selectors
Preparation for fixing issue 5769 (method selectors do not auto-dereference): The actual fix may require some cleanups in all these sections, and syntactically, method expressions and method values are selector expressions. Moving them next to each other so that it's easy to see the actual changes (next CL). No content changes besides the section moves. LGTM=iant, rsc R=r, rsc, iant, ken CC=golang-codereviews https://codereview.appspot.com/132300043
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/go_spec.html455
1 files changed, 228 insertions, 227 deletions
diff --git a/doc/go_spec.html b/doc/go_spec.html
index a32fa457c..a5edc8646 100644
--- a/doc/go_spec.html
+++ b/doc/go_spec.html
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!--{
"Title": "The Go Programming Language Specification",
- "Subtitle": "Version of August 5, 2014",
+ "Subtitle": "Version of August 28, 2014",
"Path": "/ref/spec"
}-->
@@ -2537,6 +2537,233 @@ p.M0() // ((*p).T0).M0()
</pre>
+<h3 id="Method_expressions">Method expressions</h3>
+
+<p>
+If <code>M</code> is in the <a href="#Method_sets">method set</a> of type <code>T</code>,
+<code>T.M</code> is a function that is callable as a regular function
+with the same arguments as <code>M</code> prefixed by an additional
+argument that is the receiver of the method.
+</p>
+
+<pre class="ebnf">
+MethodExpr = ReceiverType "." MethodName .
+ReceiverType = TypeName | "(" "*" TypeName ")" | "(" ReceiverType ")" .
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+Consider a struct type <code>T</code> with two methods,
+<code>Mv</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>T</code>, and
+<code>Mp</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>*T</code>.
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+type T struct {
+ a int
+}
+func (tv T) Mv(a int) int { return 0 } // value receiver
+func (tp *T) Mp(f float32) float32 { return 1 } // pointer receiver
+
+var t T
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+The expression
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+T.Mv
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+yields a function equivalent to <code>Mv</code> but
+with an explicit receiver as its first argument; it has signature
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+func(tv T, a int) int
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+That function may be called normally with an explicit receiver, so
+these five invocations are equivalent:
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+t.Mv(7)
+T.Mv(t, 7)
+(T).Mv(t, 7)
+f1 := T.Mv; f1(t, 7)
+f2 := (T).Mv; f2(t, 7)
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+Similarly, the expression
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+(*T).Mp
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+yields a function value representing <code>Mp</code> with signature
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+func(tp *T, f float32) float32
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+For a method with a value receiver, one can derive a function
+with an explicit pointer receiver, so
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+(*T).Mv
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+yields a function value representing <code>Mv</code> with signature
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+func(tv *T, a int) int
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+Such a function indirects through the receiver to create a value
+to pass as the receiver to the underlying method;
+the method does not overwrite the value whose address is passed in
+the function call.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The final case, a value-receiver function for a pointer-receiver method,
+is illegal because pointer-receiver methods are not in the method set
+of the value type.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Function values derived from methods are called with function call syntax;
+the receiver is provided as the first argument to the call.
+That is, given <code>f := T.Mv</code>, <code>f</code> is invoked
+as <code>f(t, 7)</code> not <code>t.f(7)</code>.
+To construct a function that binds the receiver, use a
+<a href="#Function_literals">function literal</a> or
+<a href="#Method_values">method value</a>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+It is legal to derive a function value from a method of an interface type.
+The resulting function takes an explicit receiver of that interface type.
+</p>
+
+<h3 id="Method_values">Method values</h3>
+
+<p>
+If the expression <code>x</code> has static type <code>T</code> and
+<code>M</code> is in the <a href="#Method_sets">method set</a> of type <code>T</code>,
+<code>x.M</code> is called a <i>method value</i>.
+The method value <code>x.M</code> is a function value that is callable
+with the same arguments as a method call of <code>x.M</code>.
+The expression <code>x</code> is evaluated and saved during the evaluation of the
+method value; the saved copy is then used as the receiver in any calls,
+which may be executed later.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The type <code>T</code> may be an interface or non-interface type.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+As in the discussion of <a href="#Method_expressions">method expressions</a> above,
+consider a struct type <code>T</code> with two methods,
+<code>Mv</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>T</code>, and
+<code>Mp</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>*T</code>.
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+type T struct {
+ a int
+}
+func (tv T) Mv(a int) int { return 0 } // value receiver
+func (tp *T) Mp(f float32) float32 { return 1 } // pointer receiver
+
+var t T
+var pt *T
+func makeT() T
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+The expression
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+t.Mv
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+yields a function value of type
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+func(int) int
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+These two invocations are equivalent:
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+t.Mv(7)
+f := t.Mv; f(7)
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+Similarly, the expression
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+pt.Mp
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+yields a function value of type
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+func(float32) float32
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+As with <a href="#Selectors">selectors</a>, a reference to a non-interface method with a value receiver
+using a pointer will automatically dereference that pointer: <code>pt.Mv</code> is equivalent to <code>(*pt).Mv</code>.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+As with <a href="#Calls">method calls</a>, a reference to a non-interface method with a pointer receiver
+using an addressable value will automatically take the address of that value: <code>t.Mp</code> is equivalent to <code>(&amp;t).Mp</code>.
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+f := t.Mv; f(7) // like t.Mv(7)
+f := pt.Mp; f(7) // like pt.Mp(7)
+f := pt.Mv; f(7) // like (*pt).Mv(7)
+f := t.Mp; f(7) // like (&amp;t).Mp(7)
+f := makeT().Mp // invalid: result of makeT() is not addressable
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+Although the examples above use non-interface types, it is also legal to create a method value
+from a value of interface type.
+</p>
+
+<pre>
+var i interface { M(int) } = myVal
+f := i.M; f(7) // like i.M(7)
+</pre>
+
+
<h3 id="Index_expressions">Index expressions</h3>
<p>
@@ -3436,232 +3663,6 @@ channel is closed and empty.
</p>
-<h3 id="Method_expressions">Method expressions</h3>
-
-<p>
-If <code>M</code> is in the <a href="#Method_sets">method set</a> of type <code>T</code>,
-<code>T.M</code> is a function that is callable as a regular function
-with the same arguments as <code>M</code> prefixed by an additional
-argument that is the receiver of the method.
-</p>
-
-<pre class="ebnf">
-MethodExpr = ReceiverType "." MethodName .
-ReceiverType = TypeName | "(" "*" TypeName ")" | "(" ReceiverType ")" .
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-Consider a struct type <code>T</code> with two methods,
-<code>Mv</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>T</code>, and
-<code>Mp</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>*T</code>.
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-type T struct {
- a int
-}
-func (tv T) Mv(a int) int { return 0 } // value receiver
-func (tp *T) Mp(f float32) float32 { return 1 } // pointer receiver
-
-var t T
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-The expression
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-T.Mv
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-yields a function equivalent to <code>Mv</code> but
-with an explicit receiver as its first argument; it has signature
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-func(tv T, a int) int
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-That function may be called normally with an explicit receiver, so
-these five invocations are equivalent:
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-t.Mv(7)
-T.Mv(t, 7)
-(T).Mv(t, 7)
-f1 := T.Mv; f1(t, 7)
-f2 := (T).Mv; f2(t, 7)
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-Similarly, the expression
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-(*T).Mp
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-yields a function value representing <code>Mp</code> with signature
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-func(tp *T, f float32) float32
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-For a method with a value receiver, one can derive a function
-with an explicit pointer receiver, so
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-(*T).Mv
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-yields a function value representing <code>Mv</code> with signature
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-func(tv *T, a int) int
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-Such a function indirects through the receiver to create a value
-to pass as the receiver to the underlying method;
-the method does not overwrite the value whose address is passed in
-the function call.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-The final case, a value-receiver function for a pointer-receiver method,
-is illegal because pointer-receiver methods are not in the method set
-of the value type.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Function values derived from methods are called with function call syntax;
-the receiver is provided as the first argument to the call.
-That is, given <code>f := T.Mv</code>, <code>f</code> is invoked
-as <code>f(t, 7)</code> not <code>t.f(7)</code>.
-To construct a function that binds the receiver, use a
-<a href="#Function_literals">function literal</a> or
-<a href="#Method_values">method value</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-It is legal to derive a function value from a method of an interface type.
-The resulting function takes an explicit receiver of that interface type.
-</p>
-
-<h3 id="Method_values">Method values</h3>
-
-<p>
-If the expression <code>x</code> has static type <code>T</code> and
-<code>M</code> is in the <a href="#Method_sets">method set</a> of type <code>T</code>,
-<code>x.M</code> is called a <i>method value</i>.
-The method value <code>x.M</code> is a function value that is callable
-with the same arguments as a method call of <code>x.M</code>.
-The expression <code>x</code> is evaluated and saved during the evaluation of the
-method value; the saved copy is then used as the receiver in any calls,
-which may be executed later.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-The type <code>T</code> may be an interface or non-interface type.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-As in the discussion of <a href="#Method_expressions">method expressions</a> above,
-consider a struct type <code>T</code> with two methods,
-<code>Mv</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>T</code>, and
-<code>Mp</code>, whose receiver is of type <code>*T</code>.
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-type T struct {
- a int
-}
-func (tv T) Mv(a int) int { return 0 } // value receiver
-func (tp *T) Mp(f float32) float32 { return 1 } // pointer receiver
-
-var t T
-var pt *T
-func makeT() T
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-The expression
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-t.Mv
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-yields a function value of type
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-func(int) int
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-These two invocations are equivalent:
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-t.Mv(7)
-f := t.Mv; f(7)
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-Similarly, the expression
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-pt.Mp
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-yields a function value of type
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-func(float32) float32
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-As with <a href="#Selectors">selectors</a>, a reference to a non-interface method with a value receiver
-using a pointer will automatically dereference that pointer: <code>pt.Mv</code> is equivalent to <code>(*pt).Mv</code>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-As with <a href="#Calls">method calls</a>, a reference to a non-interface method with a pointer receiver
-using an addressable value will automatically take the address of that value: <code>t.Mp</code> is equivalent to <code>(&amp;t).Mp</code>.
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-f := t.Mv; f(7) // like t.Mv(7)
-f := pt.Mp; f(7) // like pt.Mp(7)
-f := pt.Mv; f(7) // like (*pt).Mv(7)
-f := t.Mp; f(7) // like (&amp;t).Mp(7)
-f := makeT().Mp // invalid: result of makeT() is not addressable
-</pre>
-
-<p>
-Although the examples above use non-interface types, it is also legal to create a method value
-from a value of interface type.
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-var i interface { M(int) } = myVal
-f := i.M; f(7) // like i.M(7)
-</pre>
-
<h3 id="Conversions">Conversions</h3>
<p>