Minor fixes to the page for vendors.

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/www/for-vendors.html b/www/for-vendors.html
index dff69860..bc239101 100644
--- a/www/for-vendors.html
+++ b/www/for-vendors.html
@@ -89,12 +89,12 @@ works:</p>
 
 <p>Open-source projects are mostly manned by volunteers attracted to a
 particular technical problem; the results are published as source code
-under licenses that encourage free reuse and redistribution, and are
-freely available to all.</p>
+under licenses that encourage free reuse and redistribution, and make the
+code freely available to all.</p>
 
 <p>By harnessing the power of peer review, this process has been
 found to lead to a significantly higher average level of code quality
-than conventional propritary development.  Open-source developers also
+than conventional proprietary development.  Open-source developers also
 take pride in their demonstrated ability to respond exceptionally
 rapidly to bug reports; it is not at all uncommon for open-source
 projects to issue fix patches the same day as a user complaint.</p>
@@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ top 5% in ability and experience.</p>
 
 <p>Red Hat and other distribution vendors select and integrate the
 work of literally thousands of open-source projects like GPSD to
-produce entire running operating systems of unprecedented high 
+produce entire running operating systems of unprecedentedly high 
 quality.</p>
 
 <p>The main disadvantage of open-source development is that, except
 for the small minority that has attracted direct corporate sponsorship
 from outfits like Red Hat or major users like IBM, open-source
-projects have no budgets.  Also, for philosophical and cultural
+projects have no budgets.  Also, for both philosophical and practical
 reasons, we do not sign NDAs and in general cannot deal with companies
 that absolutely require them.</p>