diff options
| author | Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0@gmail.com> | 2014-09-01 16:48:19 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> | 2014-09-04 14:44:18 -0400 |
| commit | e4daf4676179ec729762f7a21c352c35d2293af6 (patch) | |
| tree | 51f364f13593fe9d6a67892862637d30e615d70b /www | |
| parent | 29df9a73c08aa7c36adfc9f6fcaa41f434a26703 (diff) | |
| download | gpsd-e4daf4676179ec729762f7a21c352c35d2293af6.tar.gz | |
Fix off-by-one type
Diffstat (limited to 'www')
| -rw-r--r-- | www/reliability.html | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/www/reliability.html b/www/reliability.html index a47cb7b9..9a9438f8 100644 --- a/www/reliability.html +++ b/www/reliability.html @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ release cycle.</p> <p>cppcheck is much newer and much less prone to false positives. Likewise scan-build. But here's what experience tells us: -each of these three tools finds overlapping but different sets of +each of these four tools finds overlapping but different sets of bugs. Coverity is, by reputation at least, capable enough that it might dominate one or more of them - but why take chances? Best to use all four and constrain the population of undiscovered bugs into as |