| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Up until now, the PWN was whatever the GPS said it was. With NMEA 4.10
this is no longer sustainable. The u-blox 9 defaults to NMEA 4.10, sort
of. It sometimes puts NMEA 4.0 PRNs into NMEA 4.10 sentences.
Some people like to use both u-blox binary and NMEA sentences mixed
together, so the time has come to enforce the PRN complies with
NMEA 4.0 extended numbering. Sadly this can not map exactly into
u-blox numbering, but is a start.
Fixing this uncovered other examples of non NMEA compliant sentences in
the regressions. So many regressions changed. The most obvious
change is that NMEA 4.0 puts the SBAS PRN in the range 33-64 and
152-158, not 120-158 as u-blox does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Try to do it with forward and backward compatibility, which is
challenging with current miscojson.
Sometimes epe was used to 2D estimated erro. Sometimes for 3D error.
So make it explicit eph is 2D, and sep is 3D.
|
|
|
|
| |
Odd that it was never there before...
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Required a regression-test rebuild, of course. The field is still set by
the TSIP and SiRF drivers; the SiRF driver actually uses it. It may be
possible to eliminate the TSIP uses, but so far attempting this has
produced odd regression-test failures.
|
|
Also, move the ephemeral ports used for these well up into the
private-port range.
|