vaapipostproc: params video_info_changed() callers

The signature is video_info_changed(old_vip, new_vip). Nonetheless the callers
swapped the the order. This didn't raise problems since the comparison of both
structures were not affected by its semantics.

But still it would be better to fix this to keep the coherence of the code.

Signed-off-by: Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <victorx.jaquez@intel.com>

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758007

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/gst/vaapi/gstvaapipostproc.c b/gst/vaapi/gstvaapipostproc.c
index 38fa9b5c..18f3474b 100644
--- a/gst/vaapi/gstvaapipostproc.c
+++ b/gst/vaapi/gstvaapipostproc.c
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ gst_vaapipostproc_update_sink_caps (GstVaapiPostproc * postproc, GstCaps * caps,
   if (!gst_video_info_from_caps (&vi, caps))
     return FALSE;
 
-  if (video_info_changed (&vi, &postproc->sinkpad_info))
+  if (video_info_changed (&postproc->sinkpad_info, &vi))
     postproc->sinkpad_info = vi, *caps_changed_ptr = TRUE;
 
   deinterlace = is_deinterlace_enabled (postproc, &vi);
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ gst_vaapipostproc_update_src_caps (GstVaapiPostproc * postproc, GstCaps * caps,
   if (!gst_video_info_from_caps (&vi, caps))
     return FALSE;
 
-  if (video_info_changed (&vi, &postproc->srcpad_info))
+  if (video_info_changed (&postproc->srcpad_info, &vi))
     postproc->srcpad_info = vi, *caps_changed_ptr = TRUE;
 
   if (postproc->format != GST_VIDEO_INFO_FORMAT (&postproc->sinkpad_info) &&
@@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ ensure_srcpad_buffer_pool (GstVaapiPostproc * postproc, GstCaps * caps)
       GST_VIDEO_INFO_WIDTH (&vi), GST_VIDEO_INFO_HEIGHT (&vi));
 
   if (postproc->filter_pool
-      && !video_info_changed (&vi, &postproc->filter_pool_info))
+      && !video_info_changed (&postproc->filter_pool_info, &vi))
     return TRUE;
   postproc->filter_pool_info = vi;